Mood
Everything in the library studied for it, medical and holistic together. Within each kind, what was shown to help comes first, strongest evidence first. What was tested and not shown to help stays on the list.
Strong several reviews agree · Moderate one review or consistent trials · Limited one or a few small studies · Untested no study in people, listed with what it rests on
Medication
Depression in adults
Shown to raise response in depression against placebo, with about 2.7 times the odds, and had the highest odds of response of 21 antidepressants, with higher dropout rates.
Compared with placebo [1][2]; other antidepressants in head-to-head trials [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 18 trials, response was more likely on amitriptyline than placebo (OR 2.67, 95% CI 2.21 to 3.23). Fewer people left for lack of effect (OR 0.20), and more left for side effects (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.71 to 6.35) [1]. In a network meta-analysis of 21 antidepressants, amitriptyline had the highest odds of response against placebo (OR 2.13, 95% CrI 1.89 to 2.41), was among the drugs with higher response rates in head-to-head trials, and was among those with the highest dropout rates [2].
- Population
- 3,509 adults with major depression in 39 trials of 3 to 12 weeks [1]; 116,477 adults in 522 trials [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Randomization, allocation concealment and blinding were usually poorly reported, and funnel plots suggested possible publication bias [1]. Certainty in the network analysis ranged from moderate to very low [2].
Depression, added to an antidepressant
Shown to about double the odds of remission when added to an antidepressant in depression that had not responded, with about 1 extra remission per 9 treated.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 16 trials, adding an atypical antipsychotic raised response (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.95) and remission (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.37) against placebo, and people stopped for adverse events more often (OR 3.91, 95% CI 2.68 to 5.72) [8]. A second meta-analysis found remission odds ratios of 2.01 for aripiprazole (95% CI 1.48 to 2.73) and 1.79 for quetiapine (95% CI 1.33 to 2.42), each with a number needed to treat of 9. Effects on clinician-rated depression severity were small to moderate (Hedges' g 0.26 to 0.48) [9].
- Population
- 3,480 patients in 16 trials [8]; adults with treatment-resistant depression in 14 trials of 4 to 12 weeks [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Short trials of 4 to 12 weeks. The band above is the share gaining remission beyond placebo, about 1 in 9. In the aripiprazole add-on trials, restlessness affected 25% against 4% on placebo [10].
Depression in adults
Shown to raise response in adult depression, 62% against 51% on placebo in seven pooled trials, level with SSRIs.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In original data from seven trials, response was 62% on bupropion, 63% on SSRIs and 51% on placebo, and remission was 47%, 47% and 36% [1]. Across 522 trials of 21 antidepressants that included bupropion, every drug had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13 [2]. A systematic review of 51 studies found the more robust trials favored bupropion over placebo and most head-to-head trials showed effects equal to other antidepressants [3].
- Population
- Adults with major depression in 7 randomized trials comparing bupropion, SSRIs and placebo [1]; 116,477 adults in 522 trials [2]; 51 studies of bupropion as an antidepressant [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Smaller and older studies of bupropion showed larger effects against placebo [2]. The evidence is thinner in people with a first episode who have never been treated [3]. Most trials lasted weeks.
Depression, intravenous ketamine
Shown to lower depression scores within 24 hours more than placebo, with racemic ketamine's effect lasting into follow-up in a meta-analysis of 49 trials. Used off-label.
Compared with saline placebo or midazolam [1]; placebo or active control in pooled trials [2][3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Cochrane review, ketamine raised response and remission at 24 hours over placebo (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.54 to 10.10) and lowered depression scores (SMD -0.87, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.48), in very low-certainty evidence [1]. Across 49 trials, a first high dose of racemic ketamine lowered depression severity by SMD -0.73 (95% CI -0.91 to -0.56) against control. Effects stayed significant during repeated dosing (SMD -0.61) and at follow-up after the last dose (SMD -0.65), and higher doses did more than low doses [2]. An earlier meta-analysis found larger response and remission ratios for racemic ketamine (RR 3.01 and 3.70) than for esketamine (RR 1.38 and 1.47) [3].
- Population
- 31 ketamine trials within 64 studies and 5,299 adults with unipolar depression [1]; 3,299 participants in 49 trials [2]; 1,877 participants in 24 trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Most ketamine trials gave one dose and measured hours to days later [1]. Dissociation makes blinding hard, and heterogeneity ran up to 87.6% [2]. Not an FDA-approved use.
Suicidal thoughts
Shown to reduce suicidal thoughts within a day of a single ketamine infusion, an effect lasting up to 3 days. The esketamine label states no reduction in suicide was shown.
Compared with saline or midazolam [7]; control infusions [8]; placebo spray added to standard care [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In individual data from 10 trials, one infusion reduced suicidal ideation within 1 day and for up to 1 week, with effect sizes of d = 0.48 to 0.85, partly independent of mood changes [7]. Across 15 trials, suicidal ideation scores fell at 4 hours (SMD -0.51) and 24 to 72 hours (SMD -0.57), but not after, with almost no data on suicidal behavior [8]. In two esketamine trials in people with active suicidal intent, depression scores fell 3.8 to 3.9 points more than placebo at 24 hours, but clinician-rated suicidality did not differ [4].
- Population
- 167 adults with suicidal ideation at baseline [7]; 572 adults in 15 trials [8]; 449 hospitalized adults with major depression and suicidal intent [4].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [4]
- Caveats
- Short follow-up and marked heterogeneity [8]. The esketamine label states effectiveness in preventing suicide or reducing suicidal ideation or behavior has not been demonstrated [4].
Preventing mood episodes in bipolar disorder
Shown to lower relapse in bipolar disorder against placebo, by about 16% to 22% in pooled trials, while preventing mania less well than lithium.
Compared with placebo [1][2][3][4]; lithium [1][2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Cochrane review, clinical worsening that needed added treatment was less likely on lamotrigine than placebo (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.98), and so was a return of manic symptoms at one year (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.87). Against lithium, manic symptoms returned more often on lamotrigine (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.44), while fewer people had at least one adverse effect (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.96) [1]. A second meta-analysis found a lower relapse or recurrence rate than placebo (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.99) and no difference from lithium (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.25) [2]. A third found fewer new depressive episodes than on placebo (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.98) [3]. In the two 18-month label trials, lamotrigine delayed the next mood episode, and a combined analysis found the effect stronger for depression than for mania [4].
- Population
- 2,314 adults with bipolar disorder in 11 trials, 1,146 on lamotrigine [1]; 20 RCTs and 20 cohort studies, 1,166 lamotrigine users in the RCTs [2]; 24 trials with 2,257 patients and 2,320 controls [3]; adults with bipolar I disorder stabilized on lamotrigine and then randomized for up to 18 months [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane review rated the evidence low to moderate certainty and found unclear risk of bias in every study [1]. The main trials enrolled only people who had already responded to lamotrigine before randomization [4].
Bipolar depression
Shown to improve bipolar depression modestly against placebo, with response about 1.27 times as likely, and in one pooled analysis only in more severe depression.
Compared with placebo [5][2][3][6]; lithium, olanzapine with fluoxetine, citalopram and inositol [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In individual data from five trials, response on the Hamilton depression scale was more likely on lamotrigine than placebo (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.47). The gain was seen in people with Hamilton scores above 24 (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.87) and not in those at 24 or below (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.27) [5]. Added to other treatment, lamotrigine lowered depression scores more than placebo (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.10) [2]. As a single drug it beat placebo by a small margin (SMD 0.155, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.305) [3]. Across unipolar and bipolar trials pooled together, response was more likely than on placebo (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.78), and lamotrigine did not differ from lithium, olanzapine with fluoxetine, citalopram or inositol [6].
- Population
- 1,072 adults in five placebo-controlled trials [5]; trials within 20 RCTs [2]; 24 trials [3]; 18 studies with 2,152 people, 14 of them in bipolar depression [6].
- Sources
- [5], [2], [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The pooled effects are small. The label states that effectiveness in acute mood episodes has not been established and lamotrigine is not approved for this use [4].
Depression in adults
Shown to reduce depression more than placebo in adults, with a higher response rate than SSRIs at two weeks and at the end of acute treatment.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of 522 trials, every antidepressant studied had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13, and in head-to-head trials mirtazapine was among seven drugs with higher response rates than other antidepressants (odds ratios 1.19 to 1.96) [1]. In a Cochrane review, mirtazapine had a higher response rate than SSRIs at two weeks (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.88) and at the end of acute treatment (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.39), and than venlafaxine (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.25). It did not differ from tricyclic antidepressants (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.10), and dropouts did not differ from other antidepressants [2].
- Population
- 116,477 adults in 522 trials [1]; 4,974 participants in 29 trials, most followed for six weeks [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The network meta-analysis rated certainty moderate to very low, and its abstract does not give the mirtazapine figure against placebo. Most trials lasted 6 to 12 weeks.
Depression in adults
Shown to raise response in adult depression more than placebo. Head-to-head trials placed venlafaxine among the higher response rates and duloxetine level with other antidepressants.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 522 trials of 21 antidepressants, every drug had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13 and a summary standardized mean difference of 0.30 (95% CrI 0.26 to 0.34). In head-to-head trials, venlafaxine was among the drugs with higher response rates, and duloxetine and venlafaxine were among those with the most dropouts [1]. An earlier meta-analysis of 32 trials found venlafaxine ahead of other antidepressants by a standardized effect size of 0.14 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.22), with a similar margin over SSRIs [2]. Duloxetine did not differ from other antidepressants in a Cochrane review of 16 trials [3]. Desvenlafaxine at 50 to 400 mg a day lowered depression scores more than placebo in 8 trials [4]. For venlafaxine, response rose with dose up to about 75 to 150 mg, with a smaller rise above that [5].
- Population
- 116,477 adults in 522 trials [1]; 32 randomized trials of venlafaxine [2]; 5,735 participants in 16 trials of duloxetine against other antidepressants [3]; 8 RCTs of desvenlafaxine [4]; 19,364 participants in 77 dose-finding studies [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The headline figures in [1] cover all antidepressant classes, and its certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. The abstract of [4] gives no effect size. Most trials lasted weeks.
Depression in adults
Shown to reduce depression symptoms more than placebo in adults, by about 2 points on the Hamilton scale, with about 7 treated for one extra response.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 522 trials of 21 antidepressants, every drug had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13 and a summary standardized mean difference of 0.30 (95% CrI 0.26 to 0.34) [1]. In 131 placebo-controlled SSRI trials, SSRIs lowered Hamilton depression scores 1.94 points more than placebo (95% CI 1.37 to 2.50) and lowered the risk of no remission (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.91) [2]. In primary care trials, response was more likely on an SSRI than placebo (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.43), with a number needed to treat of 7 to 8 [3]. In individual data from trials submitted to FDA, the difference between drug and placebo was 1.75 Hamilton points (95% CI 1.63 to 1.86). A large response occurred in 24.5% on a drug and 9.6% on placebo, which the authors read as about 15% of participants having a substantial drug effect beyond placebo [4].
- Population
- 116,477 adults in 522 trials [1]; 27,422 adults in 131 trials [2]; 14 primary care studies, 4 of them testing SSRIs, mostly 6 to 8 weeks long [3]; 73,388 adults and children in 232 trials of antidepressant monotherapy [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- [1] and [4] cover all antidepressant classes, not SSRIs alone. [2] rated every trial at high risk of bias and set 3 Hamilton points as its threshold for clinical significance, which the pooled effect did not reach. The gap between drug and placebo widened with greater baseline severity [4]. Most trials lasted weeks.
Preventing winter depression
Shown to lower new episodes of seasonal depression in adults with a history of it, with 84% staying depression-free against 72% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Started in autumn before symptoms and continued to spring, extended-release bupropion lowered the risk of a depressive episode (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.72). The number needed to treat was 8 where the yearly recurrence rate is 30% and 4 where it is 60%. Headache, insomnia and nausea were more frequent than on placebo [7]. Across the three trials, 84.3% on bupropion and 72.0% on placebo stayed free of a depressive episode [8].
- Population
- 1,100 adults with a history of seasonal affective disorder in 3 RCTs [7][8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- All three trials had high dropout, and the review rated the evidence moderate quality. The review found no trials comparing bupropion with light therapy or psychological therapy [7].
Treatment-resistant depression, esketamine nasal spray
Shown to lower depression scores in treatment-resistant depression by about 4 to 7 points more than placebo on a 60-point scale after 4 weeks.
Compared with placebo nasal spray, with or without a new oral antidepressant [4]; placebo in pooled trials [1][2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- With a newly started oral antidepressant, esketamine 56 or 84 mg lowered MADRS scores by 19.8 points against 15.8 on placebo spray, a difference of 4.0 (95% CI 0.6 to 7.3), most of it visible at 24 hours. As monotherapy, the differences were 5.1 points at 56 mg and 6.8 at 84 mg [4]. A Cochrane review found esketamine likely raised remission at 24 hours (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.71 to 4.40, moderate certainty) and raised response (OR 2.11) [1]. A second meta-analysis found effects during repeated esketamine dosing did not differ significantly from control (SMD -0.15 to -0.22) [2].
- Population
- 223 adults aged 18 to 64 in one 4-week trial, and 378 in a monotherapy trial [4]; 894 to 1,071 adults in 5 esketamine trials [1]; esketamine trials within 49 [2].
- Sources
- [4], [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The pooled analyses disagree on whether esketamine keeps its edge during repeated dosing [2]. Both arms improved a lot in the label trials, so the difference is smaller than each group's change [4].
Staying well on esketamine
Shown to delay relapse in people who had improved on esketamine, about half the hazard of relapse after a switch to placebo spray.
Compared with switching to placebo nasal spray, with the oral antidepressant continued [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In adults in stable remission after at least 16 weeks of esketamine plus an oral antidepressant, continuing esketamine lengthened time to relapse (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.84). In stable responders not in remission, the HR was 0.30 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.55) [4].
- Population
- Adults aged 18 to 64 who had remitted or responded on esketamine, in one randomized withdrawal trial [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The label notes the hazard ratio did not appear constant over the trial [4]. Only people who had already responded were enrolled.
Depression, as an add-on
Shown to improve depression scores and remission modestly when added to standard treatment, in unipolar and bipolar depression, an off-label use.
Compared with placebo added to standard treatment [15][16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Added to first-line treatment, modafinil improved overall depression scores (point estimate -0.35, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.10) and remission (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.49), with a positive effect on fatigue and adverse events no different from placebo [15]. In bipolar depression, added modafinil or armodafinil raised response (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.37) and remission (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.73), with no rise in mood switching or suicide attempts [16].
- Population
- 910 adults with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression in 6 trials [15]; 795 on drug and 792 on placebo in 5 bipolar depression trials, 4 of them of armodafinil [16].
- Sources
- [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Few trials. Both reviews included bipolar trials, so they overlap. Not an FDA-approved use.
PTSD
Shown to improve PTSD symptoms in adults, with 58% responding on an SSRI against 35% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- SSRIs lowered the risk of not responding against placebo (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.74), with PTSD symptoms improving in 58% on an SSRI and 35% on placebo. Withdrawal from treatment was more frequent on SSRIs (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.87), and 9% of people on SSRIs dropped out for adverse events [12].
- Population
- 1,078 adults in 8 SSRI trials for the response outcome, within a review of 66 RCTs and 7,442 participants lasting 13 days to 28 weeks [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Moderate-certainty evidence. Withdrawals were higher on paroxetine than placebo when that drug was analyzed alone (RR 1.55) [12].
Staying well after symptoms improve
Shown to lower relapse in people who had improved: about 22 fewer relapses per 100 on a continued SSRI than after a switch to placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 40 studies in depression, relapse was 20.9% on a continued antidepressant and 39.7% after a switch to placebo (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.43). For SSRIs the difference was 21.8 percentage points (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.38) [13]. In UK primary care, relapse by 52 weeks occurred in 39% of people who stayed on their antidepressant and 56% of those who tapered to placebo (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.70) [14]. In anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD, relapse was 16.4% on a continued antidepressant and 36.4% on placebo (OR for relapse after discontinuation 3.11, 95% CI 2.48 to 3.89) [15].
- Population
- 8,890 people with depression in remission in 40 studies [13]; 478 adults who felt well enough to stop, mean age 54 [14]; 5,233 responders in 28 studies followed up to one year [15].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- These trials enrolled only people who had already improved on the drug. The discontinuation group in [14] also reported more withdrawal symptoms, and adherence to the assigned arm was 70% and 52%. [15] has no data beyond one year. Antidepressant classes were pooled in [14] and [15].
Premenstrual syndrome and PMDD
Shown to reduce premenstrual symptoms in women with PMS or PMDD by a moderate amount, more with daily dosing than with dosing in the luteal phase only.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- SSRIs lowered overall self-rated premenstrual symptoms against placebo (SMD -0.57, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.42). The effect was larger with continuous dosing (SMD -0.69) than with luteal phase dosing (SMD -0.39). Nausea (OR 3.30), insomnia (OR 1.99) and sexual dysfunction or decreased libido (OR 2.32) were more frequent than on placebo [16]. The 2013 version of the same review reported numbers needed to harm of 7 for nausea and 14 for decreased libido at moderate doses [17].
- Population
- 1,742 women in 12 studies for the symptom outcome, within 34 RCTs of fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, escitalopram and citalopram [16]; 31 RCTs [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Both sources are versions of one Cochrane review. 68% of the included studies were funded by drug companies, and the authors suspected publication bias in the response analysis [16].
Depression in adults
Shown to reduce depression symptoms more than placebo in adults. Response matched SSRIs in one meta-analysis and ranked among the lower rates in another.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of 522 trials, every antidepressant studied, trazodone among them, had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13. In head-to-head trials, trazodone was among the drugs with lower response rates (odds ratios 0.51 to 0.84) and among those with the most dropouts [1]. In a meta-analysis of trials against SSRIs, response was 61.1% on trazodone or the related drug nefazodone and 61.7% on SSRIs (RR 1.002, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.17), with no difference in discontinuation [2]. In a six-week trial of an extended-release form, Hamilton depression scores fell 11.4 points on trazodone and 9.3 on placebo [3]. In a trial against venlafaxine and placebo, both drugs beat placebo on some measures, and trazodone did more for sleep disturbance [4].
- Population
- 116,477 adults in 522 trials [1]; adults in trials comparing trazodone or nefazodone with SSRIs [2]; adults with major depressive disorder in a six-week trial [3]; 225 adults with major depression, 149 completing six weeks [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- [2] pooled trazodone with nefazodone and does not report trazodone alone. The two meta-analyses differ on how trazodone compares with other antidepressants. Trials lasted weeks.
Esketamine against quetiapine
One trial found 27% in remission at 8 weeks on esketamine against 18% on quetiapine, each added to an SSRI or SNRI, in treatment-resistant depression.
Compared with extended-release quetiapine, each added to an SSRI or SNRI [5]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Remission at week 8 occurred in 91 of 336 (27.1%) on esketamine against 60 of 340 (17.6%) on quetiapine. Remission at week 8 with no relapse through week 32 occurred in 21.7% against 14.1% [5].
- Population
- 676 adults with treatment-resistant depression [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- Open-label, with raters blinded. Funded by the maker of esketamine [5].
Against electroconvulsive therapy
One trial found ketamine infusions no worse than electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression without psychosis, with 55% responding against 41%.
Compared with electroconvulsive therapy [6]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Response occurred in 55.4% on ketamine and 41.2% on ECT, a difference of 14.2 percentage points (95% CI 3.9 to 24.2), meeting the noninferiority test. Delayed recall fell more after ECT (T-score -9.7 vs -0.9). Quality of life improved similarly. Ketamine was linked to dissociation and ECT to musculoskeletal effects [6].
- Population
- 403 patients referred for ECT, 365 treated, at five clinical sites [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Open-label. More people withdrew before starting ECT than ketamine [6].
Depression and anxiety in bipolar disorder
One trial found lower depression and anxiety scores in bipolar disorder when added to lamotrigine, against a low comparison dose.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Added to lamotrigine, methylene blue 195 mg lowered depression scores (MADRS P = 0.02, HAM-D P = 0.05) and anxiety scores (HAM-A P = 0.02) against a 15 mg comparison dose. Cognitive symptoms did not change significantly [5].
- Population
- 37 people with bipolar disorder in a 6-month crossover trial [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- One small trial using last observation carried forward. The abstract gives P values without effect sizes.
Added to another antidepressant
Mixed results: remission was 27% to 30% when bupropion was added to an antidepressant in three large trials, none with a placebo arm.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After citalopram alone had not brought remission, adding sustained-release bupropion gave a remission rate of 29.7% and adding buspirone 30.1%. Bupropion lowered self-rated symptom scores more (25.3% vs 17.1%) and fewer people stopped it for intolerance (12.5% vs 20.6%) [9]. In US veterans, remission at 12 weeks was 26.9% with added bupropion, 28.9% with added aripiprazole and 22.3% after a switch to bupropion, and the bupropion comparisons were not significant [10]. In adults 60 and older, remission was 28.2% with added bupropion, 28.9% with added aripiprazole and 19.3% after a switch to bupropion [11].
- Population
- Adults whose depression had not remitted on citalopram [9]; 1,522 veterans, 85% men, mean age 54 [10]; 619 adults aged 60 and older with treatment-resistant depression [11].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- No trial here compared added bupropion with added placebo, so the share of remission due to bupropion is unknown. The abstract of [9] does not give the number randomized.
Racemic ketamine against esketamine
Mixed results: two meta-analyses found larger effects for intravenous racemic ketamine than intranasal esketamine, but only by comparing separate trials, not head to head.
Compared with each other, indirectly, across trials against placebo [2][3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Racemic ketamine had larger pooled response (RR 3.01 vs 1.38) and remission ratios (RR 3.70 vs 1.47) and fewer dropouts [3]. Effect sizes were numerically larger for racemic ketamine at first dose, during repeated dosing and at follow-up [2].
- Population
- 1,877 participants in 24 trials [3]; 3,299 in 49 trials [2].
- Sources
- [3], [2]
- Caveats
- No trial compared the two directly. Racemic trials were mostly single-dose and smaller, and routes differ.
Depression without bipolar disorder
Mixed results: a 2025 meta-analysis with unpublished trials found no benefit over placebo in unipolar depression, while an earlier one pooled it with bipolar depression and found a small gain.
Compared with placebo, alone or added to an antidepressant [3][6]; lithium [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- With three unpublished studies included, lamotrigine did not beat placebo in unipolar depression, either alone or added to other treatment. No maintenance trials in unipolar depression were found [3]. An earlier meta-analysis found no difference in effect between unipolar and bipolar patients and pooled them, finding lower depression scores than placebo (SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.02) [6].
- Population
- 24 trials, the unipolar ones including three unpublished [3]; 4 studies with 187 people with unipolar depression within 18 studies [6].
- Sources
- [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The earlier analysis had few unipolar participants and did not report a unipolar estimate on its own [6]. Lamotrigine is not approved for depression.
Depression in children and teenagers
Mixed results: fluoxetine alone separated from placebo in one network meta-analysis, and a Cochrane review called the symptom reductions small and unimportant.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among 14 antidepressants, only fluoxetine reduced depression symptoms more than placebo (SMD -0.51, 95% CrI -0.99 to -0.03) [22]. On a scale running from 17 to 113, a Cochrane network meta-analysis found reductions against placebo of 2.84 points for fluoxetine (95% CI 1.56 to 4.12) and 3.51 for sertraline (95% CI 0.04 to 6.99). Escitalopram (-2.62, 95% CI -5.29 to 0.04) and paroxetine (-1.43, 95% CI -3.90 to 1.04) did not clearly differ from placebo. The review described these reductions as small and unimportant [23].
- Population
- 5,260 children and adolescents in 34 trials [22]; 26 studies in children and adolescents [23].
- Sources
- [22], [23]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality was very low for most comparisons [22]. Most trials excluded young people at risk of self-harm, and intervals for suicide-related outcomes were wide [23]. See the boxed warning under Risks.
Differences between SSRIs
Mixed results: head-to-head depression trials placed escitalopram and paroxetine among the higher response rates and fluoxetine among the lower, with small gaps once all trials were pooled.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In head-to-head depression trials, escitalopram and paroxetine were among the drugs with higher response rates than other antidepressants (odds ratios 1.19 to 1.96), and fluoxetine was among those with lower rates (0.51 to 0.84). Citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine and sertraline had fewer dropouts than other antidepressants (odds ratios 0.43 to 0.77). When placebo-controlled trials were added, the differences between drugs shrank [1]. In OCD, the effects of individual SSRIs were similar and did not differ statistically [5]. Across anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and stress disorders, pairwise comparisons showed only small differences between drugs [9].
- Population
- 116,477 adults with depression in 522 trials [1]; 3,097 adults with OCD [5]; 30,245 participants in 135 studies [9].
- Sources
- [1], [5], [9]
- Caveats
- Credible intervals were wide on most comparisons between drugs, and the certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low [1].
Depression that has not responded to an antidepressant
Not shown to reduce depression scores when lisdexamfetamine was added to an antidepressant in two 8-week trials of adults with an inadequate response.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In two phase 3 trials, the difference from placebo in change in Montgomery-Asberg depression scores was 0.1 points (95% CI -1.7 to 2.0) in one and -0.5 points (95% CI -2.3 to 1.3) in the other. Dry mouth was the only adverse event reported by more than 5% at twice the placebo rate in both [19].
- Population
- Adults aged 18 to 65 with major depressive disorder and an inadequate response to 8 weeks of an antidepressant, in two trials [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for lisdexamfetamine. The trials excluded people with other psychiatric conditions. Not an approved use.
Added to an SSRI for depression
Not shown to raise response over placebo when added to an SSRI for depression in two placebo-controlled trials of about 100 people each.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people who had not responded to citalopram or paroxetine, 50.9% responded after 4 weeks of added buspirone and 46.7% after added placebo, a difference that was not significant [5]. In a second trial in people not responding to fluoxetine or citalopram, depression scores at 6 weeks did not differ between added buspirone and placebo overall. A subgroup with severe symptoms improved more on buspirone [6]. In a large trial without a placebo arm, remission was 30.1% with added buspirone and 29.7% with added bupropion, and more people stopped buspirone for intolerance (20.6% vs 12.5%) [7]. An open-label trial of 89 people found no significant benefit from adding buspirone to escitalopram [8].
- Population
- 119 adults [5]; 102 outpatients [6]; adults whose depression had not remitted on citalopram [7]; 89 adults [8].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The authors of [5] argued their own trial may have been inconclusive. The severe-symptom result in [6] is a subgroup finding. Not an approved use.
Depression in children and teenagers
Not shown to reduce depression more than placebo in children and teenagers on venlafaxine or desvenlafaxine. Duloxetine showed a small reduction in low-certainty evidence.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of 14 antidepressants, only fluoxetine reduced symptoms more than placebo, and venlafaxine (OR 3.19) and duloxetine (OR 2.80) had more discontinuations for adverse events than placebo [23]. In a Cochrane network meta-analysis on a scale running from 17 to 113, desvenlafaxine did not differ from placebo (MD -0.07, 95% CI -3.51 to 3.36), and duloxetine lowered scores by 2.70 points (95% CI 0.37 to 5.03) in low-certainty evidence. Venlafaxine was associated with higher odds of suicide-related outcomes than placebo (OR 13.84, 95% CI 1.79 to 106.90) [24].
- Population
- 5,260 children and adolescents in 34 trials [23]; 26 studies in children and adolescents [24].
- Sources
- [23], [24], [10], [9]
- Caveats
- The interval for the venlafaxine suicide-related estimate is very wide. The Cochrane authors described the symptom reductions for most antidepressants as small and unimportant [24]. Venlafaxine and desvenlafaxine are not approved for use in pediatric patients [10][9].
Differences between SNRIs
Not shown to differ in depression response between duloxetine and venlafaxine or desvenlafaxine in four trials. More people dropped out on duloxetine than on venlafaxine.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Four studies compared duloxetine with venlafaxine (three) or desvenlafaxine (one) and found no statistically significant differences in efficacy. Dropout for any cause was more frequent on duloxetine than on venlafaxine (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.15) and than on the SSRI escitalopram (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.62) [3].
- Population
- 1,978 participants in 4 studies comparing duloxetine with another SNRI [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Few trials per comparison, with wide pooled intervals [3].
Depression not helped by an SSRI or SNRI, as an add-on
One trial found adding mirtazapine to an SSRI or SNRI did not clearly lower depression scores against placebo at 12 weeks in primary care.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At 12 weeks, mean Beck depression scores were 18.0 on added mirtazapine and 19.7 on added placebo (adjusted difference -1.83, 95% CI -3.92 to 0.27). Adverse effects were more common on mirtazapine and were associated with stopping the trial drug [11].
- Population
- Adults in primary care with depression that had not responded to an SSRI or SNRI [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One trial. The confidence interval includes both no effect and a small benefit.
Depression in dementia
One trial found mirtazapine did not lower depression scores against placebo at 13 or 39 weeks in people with dementia.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The fall in depression scores at 13 weeks did not differ between mirtazapine and placebo (difference 0.01, 95% CI -1.37 to 1.38), and the finding held to 39 weeks. Adverse reactions occurred in 41% on mirtazapine (44 of 108) and 26% on placebo (29 of 111) [13].
- Population
- People with dementia and depression randomized to mirtazapine (108), sertraline (107) or placebo (111) [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- One trial, in people with Alzheimer's disease receiving usual care.
Hormone therapy
Depressive symptoms in perimenopause
Shown to lower depressive symptoms slightly in perimenopausal women with depressive symptoms, with no benefit in women not selected for them.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In placebo-controlled trials, hormone therapy was associated with a small reduction in depressive symptom severity (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.03). No clear difference was seen by route [11].
- Population
- Perimenopausal women with depressive symptoms in 12 RCTs [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The authors rate certainty as limited [11]. A systematic review of 17 RCTs in younger menopausal women, not selected for depressive symptoms, found no benefit on depression [12].
Peptides and SARMs
Anxiety and mood
Not studied in people. In rats under chronic stress, semax reversed loss of interest in sweetened water, a depression-like sign, and restored hippocampal BDNF.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In male rats under chronic unpredictable stress, daily semax injections reversed or reduced stress-induced anhedonia, the stress-related slowing of weight gain, adrenal enlargement and the fall in hippocampal BDNF. It did not change immobility in the forced swim test [11]. FDA's review notes antidepressant-like and anxiety-reducing effects in rodents [3]. In 52 healthy adults, a single dose of semax or the related peptide selank changed resting connectivity between the right amygdala and temporal cortex on fMRI, against placebo [12].
- Population
- Male Sprague-Dawley rats [11]. Rodent studies reviewed by FDA [3]. 52 healthy adults [12].
- Sources
- [11], [3], [12]
- Caveats
- Rodent models of stress do not show what happens to anxiety or mood in people. The fMRI study measured brain connectivity, not symptoms [12]. FDA lists a meeting abstract of semax given with therapy to 120 children with depression, with no full results available [3].
Supplements
Compared with standard antidepressants
Shown to match standard antidepressants for response in adults with mild to moderate or major depression, with fewer dropouts than on SSRIs, over 4 to 12 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Response matched tricyclic and tetracyclic drugs (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.15, 5 trials) and SSRIs (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.11, 12 trials) [1]. A 2017 meta-analysis of 27 trials (3,808 patients) against SSRIs found similar response (RR 0.983) and remission (RR 1.013) and fewer dropouts (OR 0.587, 95% CI 0.478 to 0.697) [3].
- Population
- Adults with mild to moderate or major depression [1][3].
- Sources
- [1], [3]
- Caveats
- Trials ran 4 to 12 weeks, so long-term effects are not known. Benefit in severe depression or high suicide risk is unclear [3]. The 2017 search included Chinese databases [3].
Depression
Shown to improve depression scores over placebo in two small trials of adults with depression, though the review authors judged the evidence too weak to be conclusive.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review located 108 trials of 5-HTP and tryptophan, and only 2 (64 patients) met quality criteria. Combined, they favored the supplements over placebo (Peto OR 4.10, 95% CI 1.28 to 13.15, NNT 2.78), and the authors judged the evidence too weak to be conclusive [1]. A 2020 meta-analysis of 13 studies reported a remission rate of 0.65 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.78) and a large effect on questionnaire scores (Hedges' g 1.11, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.69, I² 76%) [2]. In 60 patients with a first depressive episode, 8 weeks of 5-HTP or fluoxetine gave similar HAM-D reductions, with 73.33% and 80% responding [3]. In a 25-person crossover trial in Parkinson's disease, 50 mg a day improved HDRS depression scores over placebo but not apathy [4].
- Population
- Adults with unipolar depression or dysthymia [1][2]. First-episode depression in India [3]. Parkinson's disease [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The 2020 review rated studies as relatively weak, and few had placebo groups [2]. The fluoxetine comparison had no placebo arm [3].
Depression symptoms
Shown to lower depression scores in people with mental disorders, mostly anxiety disorders, though a second statistical model did not confirm the effect.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people with mental disorders, depression symptoms fell (SMD -1.28, 95% CI -2.40 to -0.16) [2]. A 2026 analysis of 22 trials reported lower depression scores (SMD -5.68, 95% CI -8.43 to -2.94) [3].
- Population
- People with mental disorders, mostly anxiety disorders [2]. Adults in 22 RCTs [3].
- Sources
- [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The Bayesian model in [2] confirmed the anxiety effect but not the depression effect.
Stress and mood
Shown to improve stress slightly in healthy and at-risk adults over 4 weeks or more, with no change in depression or anxiety. Bayer funded the review.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across trials of 3 or more B vitamins for 4 weeks or longer, stress improved slightly (SMD 0.23, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.45). Depressive symptoms did not significantly change (SMD 0.15, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.32), nor did anxiety (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.20) [5].
- Population
- 16 trials with 2,015 participants, healthy and at-risk, 12 pooled [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- Funded by Bayer HealthCare, which sells B-complex products [5].
Depression symptoms
Shown to lower depression symptoms modestly in people with symptoms, with EPA-rich formulas only. Not shown to prevent depression.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 26 double-blind trials (2,160 participants) of people with depression symptoms, omega-3 lowered symptom scores by an SMD of -0.28. Formulations with 60% or more EPA at 1 g a day or less showed benefit (SMD -1.03 for EPA-major), and DHA-pure or DHA-major formulations did not [23]. For prevention, 31 trials (41,470 participants) found little or no effect on the risk of depression symptoms (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10) or anxiety symptoms [24].
- Population
- People with depression symptoms in treatment trials [23]; adults with or without depression followed for 6 to 12 months or more in prevention trials [24].
- Sources
- [23], [24]
- Caveats
- The treatment and prevention reviews ask different questions. In [24], effects on depression severity in existing depression were rated very-low-quality evidence.
Mood and thinking
Shown to improve anxiety, memory and intelligence scores modestly in iron-deficient children and menstruating adults, with no effect in those without deficiency.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In RCTs of non-anemic children, adolescents and menstruating adults, iron improved anxiety symptoms (d 0.34), physical well-being (d 0.42), cognitive intelligence scores (d 0.46) and short-term memory (d 0.53), and did not change attention or depression [5]. An umbrella review of 17 systematic reviews in children found modest gains in intelligence, memory and attention in anemic children, negligible or uncertain effects in children without deficiency, and no consistent change in broader mental development or school achievement [8].
- Population
- 1,408 participants in 18 studies [5]. Children in 17 systematic reviews, 3 rated high confidence [8].
- Sources
- [5], [8]
- Caveats
- The two reviews studied different groups. The 2025 abstract gives effect sizes without confidence intervals, and the effects were absent in participants without iron deficiency [5].
Depression symptoms
Shown to lower depression scores slightly when added to treatment, mainly in bipolar disorder.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 12 studies (904 patients), adjunctive NAC lowered depression scores compared with placebo (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.05, I² 45%) [6].
- Population
- Patients with bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder, 1,000 to 3,000 mg a day for 8 to 24 weeks [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Wide confidence interval. The effect appeared mainly in bipolar disorder [6].
Depression and anxiety
Shown to lower depression and anxiety in adults with diagnosed disorders, with effect sizes varying widely. Anxiety did not change in children.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In clinically diagnosed samples, probiotics lowered depression (18 trials, SMD -0.96, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.61) and anxiety (9 trials, SMD -0.59, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.19) [29]. In 13 trials of major depression (710 patients), the pooled effect favored probiotics by an SMD of 0.38 [30]. A network meta-analysis put probiotics at SMD -0.62 against placebo in major depression [31]. A 2026 review found no significant effect in trials of 12 weeks or less and an effect in 2 longer trials [32]. In 7 RCTs of children and adolescents (912 participants), anxiety did not differ from placebo (SMD -0.09) [33].
- Population
- Adults with depression or anxiety disorders [29][30][31][32]. Children and adolescents [33].
- Sources
- [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]
- Caveats
- Effect sizes differ more than twofold between reviews, and heterogeneity was high [29][32].
Premenstrual symptoms
Shown to lower PMS anxiety, depression, mood and behavioral symptoms modestly against placebo. One small trial found physical and behavioral gains but no mood change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 9 RCTs, St. John's wort lowered PMS anxiety (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.05), depression (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.17), mood disturbance (SMD -0.36, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.06) and behavioral symptoms (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.19) against placebo [4]. In a crossover trial of 36 women with mild PMS, 900 mg a day for two cycles improved physical and behavioral symptoms more than placebo. Mood and pain symptoms, anxiety, depression, hormones and cytokines did not differ [5].
- Population
- 1,020 participants in 9 RCTs published from 2000 to 2023 [4]. 36 women aged 18 to 45 [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis, which searched Iranian regional databases alongside international ones. The authors note a lack of high-quality evidence for some outcomes [4]. The single crossover trial found no mood difference, unlike the pooled result [5].
Depression and anxiety symptoms
Shown to lower depression scores against placebo in people with depression or depressive symptoms, with effect sizes varying widely across reviews.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 10 trials (594 patients), curcumin lowered depression scores (SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.13, I² 15%) and raised response rates (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.28 to 7.99). In people with diagnosed depression the SMD was -0.35, and in people with depressive symptoms it was -0.17 (95% CI -0.61 to 0.26) [25]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 19 RCTs found lower scores in people with depression (SMD -0.76, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.30, 8 studies) and in people with depressive symptoms (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.09, 11 studies) [26]. Another, of 26 RCTs (1,491 participants), reported larger drops in depression (SMD -1.53, 95% CI -2.05 to -1.02), anxiety (SMD -1.67) and stress (SMD -1.71) against placebo [27]. In 15 RCTs (1,123 adults with chronic diseases), depressive symptoms (SMD -0.65) and anxiety (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.05, I² 0%) fell [28].
- Population
- Patients with depression or depressive symptoms [25][26]; adults with depression, anxiety or stress symptoms [27]; adults with type 2 diabetes, obesity, arthritis and other chronic diseases [28].
- Sources
- [25], [26], [27], [28]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality was rated low [25]. Pooled depression effects ranged from SMD -0.32 to -1.53 across reviews [25][27]. Heterogeneity reached 94.5% and the effect was fragile in sensitivity analysis [26]. Certainty was moderate to low [27].
Premenstrual syndrome
Shown to improve overall premenstrual symptoms and premenstrual depression over placebo in women with PMS, in mostly low-quality trials from a 1999 review.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 9 trials, women on vitamin B6 were more likely than on placebo to report better overall premenstrual symptoms (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.95 to 2.54) and better premenstrual depression (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.06, 4 trials) [4].
- Population
- 940 women with premenstrual syndrome in 9 published trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The authors rated most trials low quality. Doses ran up to 100 mg a day [4]. The review is from 1999.
Depressive symptoms in people with depression
Shown to lower depressive symptom scores in adults with depression, in small trials with high heterogeneity.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 15 RCTs (962 participants diagnosed with depression), vitamin D lowered depressive symptom scores against placebo (SMD -0.98, 95% CI -1.28 to -0.68, I² 79%). The largest reductions were at daily doses up to 5,000 IU [26]. A Bayesian review of 7 studies found an SMD of -0.88 (95% credible interval -1.38 to -0.35) for vitamin D-containing supplements, with prediction intervals that crossed no effect [27].
- Population
- Adults with depressive disorders or clinically relevant depressive symptoms in randomized trials [26][27].
- Sources
- [26], [27]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was high in both reviews [26][27]. The Bayesian review also counted regimens that added other nutrients, so the two reviews do not answer exactly the same question [27]. The trials were small.
Premenstrual syndrome
Shown to make remission of premenstrual symptoms about 2.6 times as likely as placebo in women, in trials of well-described extracts.
Compared with placebo [2][3][1]; placebo, dietary supplements or other herbal preparations [3]; placebo or an active comparator [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 3 double-blind placebo-controlled trials of the Ze 440 and BNO 1095 extracts, women on vitex were 2.57 times as likely to have a remission of symptoms (RR 2.57, 95% CI 1.52 to 4.35) [2]. Across placebo-controlled trials, the pooled effect on total premenstrual symptoms was large (Hedges g -1.21, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.88), with very high heterogeneity (I² 91%) [3]. All 8 RCTs in a third review found benefit for PMS or PMDD [4]. In the trial the EMA reviewed, 178 women improved in irritability, mood, anger, headache and breast fullness against placebo [1].
- Population
- 520 women in 3 RCTs [2]; 14 RCTs [3]; 8 RCTs [4]; 178 women [1].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [4], [1]
- Caveats
- Review [3] found high risk of bias and signs of publication bias, and judged its pooled effect exploratory and probably an overestimate. Review [2] excluded most trials for poor description of the product used. The grade rests on the restricted analysis [2].
Depression symptoms
Limited evidence: lowered depression scores about 2 points, below the 3 points counted as a meaningful change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 11 trials (1,093 participants), creatine reduced depression scores by an SMD of -0.34 (95% CI -0.68 to -0.00), equal to 2.2 points on the 17-item Hamilton scale. The minimal important difference on that scale is 3.0 points. Remission odds were higher in 3 trials (OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.76 to 7.56), and response did not differ in 2 trials (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.88) [12]. A systematic review of 5 RCTs (238 participants with a mental disorder) found creatine added to escitalopram or to cognitive behavioral therapy outperformed placebo in major depression, and found no difference from placebo in female adolescents on medication or in bipolar depression [13].
- Population
- People with and without diagnosed depression, mostly creatine added to other treatment [12].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- GRADE certainty was very low. Heterogeneity was 71.3%, and trim-and-fill analysis indicated bias favoring creatine. The authors write that the true effect may be trivial or null [12].
Depression, as an add-on to antidepressants
Small trials found L-methylfolate added to antidepressants raised response and lowered symptoms in adults with major depression.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Added to antidepressants, L-methylfolate raised response on the Hamilton scale (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.46, 3 studies, 483 patients) and lowered depressive symptom scores (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.17, 4 studies, 507 patients) against antidepressants alone [7].
- Population
- Adults with major depressive disorder already taking antidepressants [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Few small studies. No trial in that review tested methylfolate alone against placebo as the only treatment.
Mood and anxiety
Linked to small drops in momentary anxiety and, less consistently, sadness in the hours after use among regular users tracked by phone. No randomized trial was located.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 357 US adults who used kratom at least 3 days a week, tracked by smartphone prompts for 15 days, kratom use in the prior 3 hours was linked to lower momentary anxiety than no use, and single use events to lower sadness. Use of prescribed anxiety or depression medicines did not change these links [23]. In the same sample, people named managing psychiatric and substance use problems as overall reasons for use [24]. In an online survey, 67% used kratom for anxiety and 65% for depression, and respondents gave it high ratings for these uses [21].
- Population
- 357 regular US kratom users [23][24]. 2,798 self-selected survey respondents [21].
- Sources
- [23], [21], [24]
- Caveats
- Observational studies of people who already use kratom and chose to take part. The authors describe the reductions in anxiety as small and call for randomized trials [23]. Self-ratings may reflect relief of withdrawal between doses.
Mood, depression and anxiety
One trial found depression scores fell from baseline in 30 women over 4 weeks, but most comparisons were not against placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 30 women given lion's mane cookies or placebo cookies for 4 weeks, depression (CES-D) and indefinite complaint scores fell from baseline in the mushroom group. Two complaint items were lower than placebo, and concentration, irritability and anxiety tended to be lower [7].
- Population
- 30 women [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One small 4-week trial. Most comparisons were against baseline, not placebo [7].
Mood, energy and quality of life
One trial found better mood, energy and quality of life than placebo over 12 weeks in Peruvian adults at low and high altitude.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 175 adults living at low and high altitude, 3 g a day of red or black maca extract for 12 weeks improved mood, energy, health-related quality of life and chronic mountain sickness scores compared with placebo. Black maca lowered blood glucose [7].
- Population
- Adults in Peru at low and high altitude [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One trial of spray-dried extracts.
Stress and fitness
One small trial found better VO2 max, grip strength and mood scores than placebo in sedentary female students over 30 days.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 78 female college students in India, 1,000 mg a day for 30 days improved heart rate, VO2 max, physical work capacity and right-hand grip strength against placebo, and anxiety, depression and well-being scores improved. The 500 mg dose differed from the 1,000 mg dose on VO2 max and work capacity [6].
- Population
- 78 sedentary female students, mean age 20.6 [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One small trial. The abstract does not report effect sizes or funding.
Stress hormones and mood
One small 4-week trial found lower tension, anger and saliva cortisol, and higher saliva testosterone, in moderately stressed adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 63 moderately stressed adults (32 men, 31 women), 4 weeks of a hot-water root extract lowered tension (11%), anger (12%) and confusion (15%) scores, lowered salivary cortisol exposure by 16%, and raised salivary testosterone by 37% compared with placebo [6].
- Population
- 63 adults [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One 4-week trial. The first author's listed affiliation is SupplementWatch. Cortisol and testosterone were measured in saliva.
Depression symptoms
One trial found lower depression scores over 1 month only in adults with mild or worse symptoms at baseline. Anxiety and stress did not change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 1 month, 100 mg of pyridoxine a day lowered depression scores more than placebo or 1,000 µg of B12 only in participants with mild or worse depression symptoms at baseline (partial η² 0.20). Anxiety and stress scores did not change [5].
- Population
- 267 adults from the general population, 215 of them female. 58 had mild or worse depression symptoms at baseline [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- One trial, and the effect appeared in a subgroup defined by baseline scores. Participants were not patients with diagnosed depression [5].
Major depression against placebo
Mixed results: a review of 29 trials found more responses than placebo in major depression, while a US trial found no difference, with sertraline also no different.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 29 trials (5,489 patients), response rates against placebo had a rate ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.49) in 9 larger trials and 1.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.87) in 9 smaller ones [1]. In a 2002 US trial of 340 outpatients with a Hamilton score of at least 20, the 8-week drop in score was 8.68 points on St. John's wort and 9.20 on placebo, and full response was 23.9% against 31.9%. Sertraline did not differ from placebo on these measures either [2].
- Population
- Adults with major depression [1][2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Placebo-controlled results were markedly heterogeneous, and trials from German-speaking countries reported more favorable results [1]. The US trial was funded by the NIMH, and its authors raise low assay sensitivity [2].
Memory and mood
Limited evidence: of 10 studies, 3 found some cognitive gains and 5 no effect, with small pooled gains in recognition and mood.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Of 10 studies, 3 found improvement in some cognitive measures, 2 mixed findings and 5 no effect. Pooled data showed better delayed recognition (SMD 0.39, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.70) and lower negative mood (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.05) [10].
- Population
- 10 RCTs. The pooled analyses each had 3 studies and about 165 participants [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The authors call the literature inconsistent and limited [10].
Depression added to an antidepressant
Small trials found mixed results added to an antidepressant. One raised response to 36% against 18% on placebo, and another found no difference.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 73 people not responding to a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, adding 800 mg twice a day for 6 weeks raised response to 36.1% against 17.6% on placebo, and remission to 25.8% against 11.7% [3]. In 107 non-remitting outpatients, adding 800 mg a day for 8 weeks did not differ from placebo (response 54.3% against 50.0%, p 0.51 for symptom scores) [4]. A 2020 review of 8 trials (1,011 subjects) found SAMe better than placebo in 3 of 5 placebo comparisons [5].
- Population
- Adults with major depression on antidepressants [3][4]. Trials of 2 to 12 weeks at 200 to 3,200 mg a day [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The two add-on trials disagree and used different doses. [3] was funded by NIMH and [4] by Australia's NHMRC. Europe PMC lists Mylan as a funder of [5].
Depression and anxiety
Not shown to change depression, anxiety or obsessive-compulsive symptoms. One small trial found fewer panic attacks on 12 g a day.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Inositol did not significantly change depressive, anxiety or obsessive-compulsive symptoms against placebo. Responders in depression were marginally more common (P = 0.06) [12]. In a 4-week crossover trial, panic attack frequency and severity fell more on 12 g a day than placebo [13].
- Population
- 242 people in 7 depression trials and 70 in 4 anxiety trials [12]; 21 people with panic disorder [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Trials were few and small [12]. The panic trial is one of four pooled anxiety trials [12][13].
Depression as a stand-alone treatment
Not shown to lower depression symptoms more than placebo in adults with major depression. Results were similar to imipramine and escitalopram, in mostly low-quality evidence.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of 8 trials (934 adults) found no strong evidence of a difference from placebo in depressive symptoms (SMD -0.54, 95% CI -1.54 to 0.46, 2 studies, 142 participants, very low quality). Results were similar to imipramine (SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.27, 4 studies, 619 participants) and escitalopram (MD 0.12, 95% CI -2.75 to 2.99, 1 study) [1]. In a 12-week trial of 189 outpatients, response was 36% on SAMe, 34% on escitalopram and 30% on placebo, and no group differed from the others [2].
- Population
- Adults with major depression, oral or injected SAMe [1]. 189 outpatients in the US [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Most evidence was rated low or very low quality [1]. The 12-week trial was funded by NIH's NCCIH, and escitalopram also did not separate from placebo [2].
Depression symptoms
Not shown to improve depression in people without B12 deficiency.
Cognition in healthy young adults
Small trials found no change in overall cognition or mood in healthy young adults, with better results on single tests such as the Stroop.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 18 adults aged 18 to 35, a single 3 g dose of a 10:1 fruiting-body extract did not change composite cognition or mood scores at 90 minutes, with better performance on one pegboard test [5]. In 41 adults aged 18 to 45, 1.8 g a day gave a faster Stroop time 60 minutes after the first dose (p = 0.005), and 28 days showed a trend toward lower subjective stress (p = 0.051) [6].
- Population
- Healthy young adults [5][6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Pilot-sized trials. The authors of the 28-day trial note null and some negative findings [6].
Preventing depression
One trial found no change in the risk of depression over 5 years in adults 50 and older.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In VITAL, 2,000 IU a day for a median 5.3 years did not change the risk of depression or clinically relevant depressive symptoms (12.9 against 13.3 per 1,000 person-years, HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.09). Mood scores did not change (PHQ-8 difference 0.01 points, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05) [50].
- Population
- 18,353 US adults 50 and older, mean age 67.5, 16,657 of them with no history of depression [50].
- Sources
- [50]
- Caveats
- One trial. Participants were not selected for deficiency or for current depression [50].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 18,353 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Therapies
Depression, compared with waiting list or usual care
Shown to lower depression moderately to largely against waiting list and usual care, with effects still present 6 to 12 months later.
Compared with care as usual and waiting list [3]; control groups [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 409 trials, CBT outperformed control conditions such as care as usual and waiting list (g 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89), and the effect was still significant at 6 to 12 months. As unguided self-help it gave g 0.45, and in children and adolescents g 0.41 [3]. An earlier analysis of 75 studies found g 0.71 (number needed to treat 2.6), which was 0.53 after adjusting for publication bias and 0.53 in higher-quality studies [4].
- Population
- 52,702 patients in 409 trials (518 comparisons) [3]. 115 studies of adults with depression [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Waiting-list controls inflate effects, and the earlier analysis found strong signs of publication bias [4]. Both analyses come from the same research group and share trials.
Depression and anxiety, online or computer CBT
Shown to lower depression and anxiety disorder symptoms against control conditions, with guided programs ahead of unguided ones right after treatment.
Compared with control treatments [13]; care as usual, waiting list, information control, psychological placebo or pill placebo [14]; face-to-face CBT [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In individual data from 39 trials, guided and unguided internet CBT lowered depression scores more than control treatments in the short and long term. Guided programs were ahead of unguided ones after treatment (PHQ-9 mean difference -0.8, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.2) and not at 6 or 12 months [13]. Across 64 trials in major depression, panic disorder, social anxiety and generalized anxiety, computer or internet CBT outperformed control groups (g 0.80, number needed to treat 2.34). Nine trials comparing it with face-to-face CBT found them equally beneficial [14].
- Population
- 9,751 people with depression in 39 trials [13]. 64 trials in adults meeting diagnostic criteria [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Few trials compared online CBT with medication [14].
Anxiety, compared with usual care or no intervention
Shown to lower anxiety around heart procedures and in other adults in pooled trials, mostly against usual care or no intervention, with large and varied effects.
Compared with control groups the source abstracts do not describe [8][9]; nonactive controls: sham intervention, usual care, waiting list or psychoeducation [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 10 trials of patients having cardiovascular procedures, reflexology lowered anxiety more than control [8]. In patients having coronary angiography, anxiety fell immediately after reflexology (Hedges' g -1.78, 95% CI -2.94 to -0.63) and 30 minutes later (g -1.16) [9]. Across adults with a range of conditions, anxiety fell (g -1.237, 95% CI -1.682 to -0.791) and depression fell (g -0.921, 95% CI -1.246 to -0.595) [10].
- Population
- 760 patients with a mean age of 59 in 10 trials [8]. 913 patients in 10 studies [9]. 2,366 adults in 26 trials [10].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Most control groups had no touch, so attention and touch are part of the effect. Two of the angiography studies were not randomized [9]. The sham-controlled results are in the blocks above.
Depression
Shown to lower depressive symptoms against control groups in a meta-analysis of 17 trials, with a moderate pooled effect.
Compared with control groups the source abstract does not describe [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 17 randomized trials, the pooled standardized mean difference was 0.73 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.93) in the random-effects model, favoring massage [15]. An earlier meta-analysis found reductions in depression among massage's largest effects [12].
- Population
- 786 people with depression in 17 trials, excluding infants and pregnant women [15]. 37 randomized studies [12].
- Sources
- [15], [12]
- Caveats
- Trials were of moderate quality, used different massage protocols and depression scales, and may be heterogeneous [15].
Depression
Limited evidence: low-quality trials found a small drop in depression scores, 1.69 points on the Hamilton scale, against sham acupuncture, and a moderate drop against no treatment.
Compared with no treatment, waiting list or treatment as usual [16]; sham acupuncture [16]; antidepressant medication [16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against no treatment, waiting list or usual care, depression severity fell (SMD -0.66, 95% CI -1.06 to -0.25, 5 trials, 488 participants). Against sham, it fell by 1.69 points on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (95% CI -3.33 to -0.05, 14 trials, 841 participants). Against medication, the difference was small (SMD -0.23, 31 trials, 3,127 participants), at very low quality [16].
- Population
- 64 trials with 7,104 people with depression [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- Most trials were at high risk of performance bias, and evidence was rated low to very low in quality [16].
Depression, compared with antidepressant medication
Not shown to differ from antidepressants at the end of treatment. A few trials favored CBT 6 to 12 months later, and CBT plus medication outperformed medication alone.
Compared with antidepressant medication [3][4][5]; medication alone, against CBT plus medication [3][4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- CBT did not differ from pharmacotherapy in the short term, and was larger at 6 to 12 months (g 0.34, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.58), from a small number of trials and not in all sensitivity analyses. CBT plus medication outperformed medication alone in the short term (g 0.51) and long term (g 0.32), and did not differ from CBT alone [3]. An earlier analysis found no difference between CBT and medication, and combined treatment ahead of medication alone (g 0.49) [4]. Across 67 head-to-head trials of psychotherapy and antidepressants for depressive and anxiety disorders, the overall difference was g 0.02 (95% CI -0.07 to 0.10) [5].
- Population
- 52,702 patients [3]. 115 studies [4]. 5,993 patients in 67 trials, 40 in depressive disorders [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The head-to-head analysis covers all psychotherapies, not CBT alone [5]. The long-term advantage rests on few trials [3].
Anxiety, stress and depression, compared with sham Reiki by untrained people
Mixed results: a review of 14 sham-controlled trials found Reiki ahead of sham on some mental health symptoms, and a chemotherapy trial found comfort rose equally with sham.
Compared with sham Reiki, usually given by an untrained person taught to copy the Reiki practitioner's hand positions [2]; a sham Reiki placebo, and standard care [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 14 trials with a placebo-Reiki group, Reiki showed a greater effect than placebo for some mental health symptoms. The reviewers rated the evidence high for clinically relevant stress and depression, moderate to high for clinically relevant anxiety, and low for anxiety and depression at normal levels [2]. In 189 people having chemotherapy, comfort and well-being rose after Reiki and also after sham Reiki, and did not change with standard care [3].
- Population
- 14 randomized placebo-controlled trials in adults [2]. 189 adults at an outpatient chemotherapy center [3].
- Sources
- [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The reviewers found few trials in each area and called the findings inconclusive, with most trials at some risk of bias [2]. The chemotherapy authors attributed the gain to one-on-one presence of a nurse [3].
Depression, compared with other psychotherapies
Not shown to differ meaningfully from other psychotherapies for depression. A tiny edge in one analysis disappeared in most sensitivity checks.
Compared with other psychotherapies [3][4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- CBT was ahead of other psychotherapies by g 0.06 (95% CI 0 to 0.12), a difference that became non-significant in most sensitivity analyses [3]. An earlier analysis found no indication that CBT differed from other psychotherapies [4].
- Population
- 52,702 patients in 409 trials [3]. 115 studies [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Both analyses come from the same research group.
Any condition, systematic reviews
Not shown to treat any condition in a review of nine trials. A Cochrane review found too few data to judge Reiki for anxiety or depression.
Compared with sham Reiki and conventional care [5]; control conditions in three trials, which the source abstract does not describe [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Of nine trials, two suggested benefit over sham for depression and one did not report group differences. There was no difference from sham for stroke recovery, for anxiety in women having amniocentesis, or for pain in diabetic nerve pain, and no effect on anxiety or depression against conventional care in women having breast biopsy. The reviewers found the evidence insufficient for any condition [5]. A Cochrane review found three trials with only 25 people with anxiety and 17 with depression, and no evidence that Reiki is either beneficial or harmful for them [6]. NCCIH states that "Reiki hasn't been clearly shown to be effective for any health-related purpose" [1].
- Population
- 9 randomized trials [5]. 3 trials in adults aged 16 or over [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [1]
- Caveats
- Trials were small, rarely replicated and often poorly reported [5][6].
Anxiety and mood, compared with plain foot massage
Limited evidence: two trials in women found anxiety and depression fell as much with plain foot massage or lay foot manipulation as with reflexology.
Compared with nonspecific foot massage [7]; lay foot manipulation, and conventional care [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 76 women with menopausal symptoms, anxiety scores fell from 0.43 to 0.22 with reflexology and from 0.37 to 0.27 with foot massage, and depression scores fell from 0.37 to 0.20 and from 0.36 to 0.20, with no difference between groups. Hot flushes and night sweats changed similarly [7]. In 385 women with advanced breast cancer, state anxiety and depressive symptoms did not differ between groups [6].
- Population
- 76 women aged 45 to 60 [7]. 385 women with advanced breast cancer [6].
- Sources
- [7], [6]
- Caveats
- In the menopause trial, 14 of 37 women given foot massage believed they had not received true reflexology [7].
Practices
Stress and distress in people without a diagnosis, against no program
Shown to lower anxiety, depression and distress in adults without a diagnosis, by about half a standard deviation, against no program or a waiting list.
Compared with no intervention [1]; control groups the source abstract does not describe [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 136 trials in nonclinical settings, mindfulness programs improved anxiety (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.80 to -0.33), depression (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.34), distress (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.31) and well-being (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.54) against no intervention, 1 to 6 months after the program ended. Prediction intervals for all four crossed zero [1]. In 29 studies of mindfulness-based stress reduction in healthy adults, the between-group effect was g = 0.53 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.64), with large effects on stress and moderate effects on anxiety, depression and distress, maintained at an average 19 weeks of follow-up [2].
- Population
- 11,605 adults in 136 trials in 29 countries, 77% women, aged 18 to 73 [1]. 2,668 healthy adults in 29 studies [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- GRADE confidence was moderate to very low, mainly from inconsistency and high risk of bias. Only the effect on distress remained when higher-risk trials were excluded, and US trials reported smaller effects [1]. Heterogeneity was high [2]. Nobody can be blinded to a meditation course.
Symptoms of psychiatric disorders
Shown to ease disorder-specific symptoms more than no treatment and other active controls in pooled trials, and no differently from established treatments such as CBT or medication.
Compared with no treatment, minimal treatment, nonspecific and specific active controls, and evidence-based treatments [5]; waiting list, other active treatments, CBT and medication [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 142 samples, mindfulness programs were superior at the end of treatment to no treatment (d = 0.55), minimal treatment (d = 0.37), nonspecific active controls (d = 0.35) and specific active controls (d = 0.23), and did not differ from evidence-based treatments (d = -0.004). The most consistent evidence was for depression, pain conditions, smoking and addictive disorders [5]. Across 209 studies, effects were g = 0.53 against waiting list and g = 0.33 against other active treatments, with no difference from traditional CBT or behavioral therapies (g = -0.07) or medication (g = 0.13, 3 studies) [6].
- Population
- 12,005 participants with psychiatric disorders [5]. 12,145 participants in 209 studies [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- The two reviews overlap in the trials they pool. The equivalence with medication rests on 3 studies [6]. Effects shrink as the comparison becomes more active [5].
Depression and depressive relapse
Shown to ease depression symptoms modestly against active control programs, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy cut the risk of relapse within 60 weeks by about 31%.
Compared with active control programs [3]; no intervention and nonspecific active controls [1]; usual care and other active treatments including antidepressants [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against active controls, depression improved by an effect size of 0.30 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.59) at 8 weeks and 0.23 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.42) at 3 to 6 months [3]. In nonclinical settings, SMD -0.53 against no intervention and -0.46 against nonspecific active controls [1]. In individual patient data from 9 trials of people with recurrent depression in remission, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy lowered the risk of relapse within 60 weeks against no such therapy (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.82) and against active treatments including antidepressants (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97) [7].
- Population
- 3,515 participants in 47 trials [3]. Adults in nonclinical settings [1]. 1,258 patients with recurrent depression, mean age 47, 75% women [7].
- Sources
- [3], [1], [7]
- Caveats
- The lower confidence limit at 8 weeks sits at zero [3]. Relapse prevention was studied in people in full or partial remission, not in current depression, and the effect was larger in those with more residual symptoms [7].
Anxiety and depression symptoms
Shown to lower self-rated anxiety and depression symptoms in two meta-analyses, by small amounts for breathwork in general and larger amounts for heart rate variability biofeedback.
Compared with non-breathwork controls, active and inactive [2]; control conditions the source abstract does not describe [5]; inactive and active controls [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Breathwork lowered self-rated anxiety (g = -0.32, 20 trials, p < 0.0001) and depressive symptoms (g = -0.40, 18 trials, p < 0.0001) against non-breathwork controls, with moderate, significant heterogeneity [2]. Across 24 studies, heart rate variability biofeedback reduced self-reported stress and anxiety against control conditions by g = 0.83, an effect not changed by whether participants had an anxiety disorder [5]. A wider meta-analysis of the same technique found its largest effects for anxiety, depression and anger, from few studies each [3].
- Population
- Adults in 20 and 18 randomized trials [2]. 484 participants in 24 studies [5]. 58 randomized trials [3].
- Sources
- [2], [5], [3]
- Caveats
- Symptoms were self-rated and nobody can be blinded to breathing training. The biofeedback analysis pooled stress and anxiety together and included some studies without control groups in its within-group estimate [5].
Depression symptoms
Shown to ease depression symptoms by a small to moderate amount, against waiting list, usual care and attention controls, and against active exercise comparisons in older adults.
Compared with waiting list, treatment as usual and attention control [6]; inactive controls such as a waiting list or education booklets [7]; active controls such as walking or chair aerobics [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people with a diagnosed mental disorder, physically active yoga lowered depressive symptoms more than waiting list, usual care and attention control (standardized mean difference 0.41, p < 0.001, 13 trials), with larger reductions at more sessions a week [6]. In older adults without a specific condition, depression improved against inactive controls (effect size 0.64) and against active controls (effect size 0.54) [7].
- Population
- 632 adults with depression, post-traumatic stress, schizophrenia, anxiety, alcohol dependence or bipolar disorder in 13 trials [6]. Older adults with a mean age of 60 or above in 22 trials [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Trials were small, and nobody can be blinded to yoga.
Stress and mood, against an active comparison
Shown to lower self-rated stress slightly more than active control conditions. In one trial, 5 minutes a day of cyclic sighing lifted mood more than mindfulness meditation.
Compared with active non-breathwork controls [2]; mindfulness meditation for the same time [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In the 5 trials with active controls, breathwork lowered stress by g = -0.26 (95% CI -0.48 to -0.04, I² 0%) [2]. In a remote randomized trial of three 5-minute daily breathing exercises against 5 minutes of mindfulness meditation for a month, breathwork, especially exhale-focused cyclic sighing, produced a greater rise in positive mood (p < 0.05) and a greater fall in breathing rate (p < 0.05). State anxiety and negative mood fell in all groups and did not differ between breathwork and meditation [4].
- Population
- Participants in 5 trials [2]. 114 adults invited into a 1-month remote trial [4].
- Sources
- [2], [4]
- Caveats
- Five small trials [2]. The 1-month trial had no inactive control, participants completed about 18 to 20 of 28 days, and outcomes were self-rated [4].
Stress, anxiety and depression
Shown to lower stress, anxiety and depression in pooled trials of tai chi and of qigong, against waiting list and varied controls, in trials with methodological limits.
Compared with varied control groups, including some nonrandomized studies [12]; waiting list [13]; lectures and structured movement alone [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Tai chi reduced stress (effect size 0.66, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.09), anxiety (0.66, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.03) and depression (0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.80) and improved mood (0.45) [12]. In healthy adults, 1 to 3 months of qigong lowered anxiety (SMD -0.75, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.40, 4 trials) and stress (SMD -0.88, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.55, 3 trials) against waiting list [13].
- Population
- 3,817 participants in 40 studies, healthy and with chronic conditions [12]. Healthy adults in 7 trials [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- The tai chi review pooled randomized and nonrandomized trials and noted inadequate controls [12]. The qigong review had few trials with methodological flaws [13].
Depression symptoms
Shown to lower depression scores when added to usual treatment in people with mental health problems, in a meta-analysis of small studies with high heterogeneity.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 10 studies (294 participants receiving cryotherapy), the between-group effect on mental health problems was medium (Hedges' g 0.76, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.36). The within-group effect for depressive symptoms was very large (g 2.95, 95% CI 2.44 to 3.45) and for quality of life medium (g 0.70, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.24) [7]. In a sham-controlled trial of 10 sessions added to antidepressant medication, Hamilton depression scores improved more with cryogenic temperatures than with -50°C (group by time interaction p = 0.02), as did quality of life and self-rated mood. Sexual satisfaction, vitality and sleep did not change [8].
- Population
- 10 studies, 6 of them controlled trials [7]. 92 adults with a depressive episode on medication, of whom 56 completed the study [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity in the pooled within-group estimate was 93%, and the reviewers added an allegiance bias rating because of who ran the studies [7]. Within-group effects include placebo response and natural recovery. Only 56 of 92 enrolled participants finished the sham-controlled trial [8].
Stress and distress, against other active programs
Mixed results: against time-matched control programs, pooled trials found less depression and no difference in anxiety or distress. Against specific active programs, no difference was found.
Compared with nonspecific active control programs [1]; specific active programs such as exercise or other psychological programs [1]; drugs, exercise and other behavioral therapies [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against nonspecific active control conditions, mindfulness programs improved depression (SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.10, 6 trials), with no statistically significant evidence for anxiety or distress and no reliable data on well-being. Against specific active control conditions there was no statistically significant evidence of superiority [1]. A review of 47 trials limited to active controls found no evidence that meditation programs were better than any active treatment, including drugs, exercise and other behavioral therapies [3].
- Population
- Adults in nonclinical settings in 136 trials [1]. 3,515 participants with a range of clinical conditions in 47 trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [3]
- Caveats
- Few trials made each active comparison, so a small difference could be missed [1]. "No better than" an active treatment can mean equal to it, which is how the review reads it [3].
Depression symptoms
Mixed results: one meta-analysis of 11 trials found lower depression scores, and another found sham-controlled trials in major depression showed no significant advantage.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 11 randomized trials, photobiomodulation lowered depression scores (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.35), with light applied to the body outperforming light applied to the head [24]. A meta-analysis of transcranial light found an effect across 8 studies regardless of diagnosis (Hedges' g 1.415), and no significant superiority over sham in the 3 double-blind trials in major depressive disorder (g 0.499, p = 0.211) [25].
- Population
- People with depression symptoms in 11 trials [24]. 8 studies, 3 of them sham-controlled trials in major depressive disorder [25].
- Sources
- [24], [25]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality was rated moderate to very low [24]. The second review describes its own conclusion as weak support and notes likely sample size bias [25].
Mood
Mixed results: a systematic review of randomized trials found no improvement in mood, while small single-session studies without control groups reported less negative feeling afterward.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 11 randomized trials reported improvements in sleep quality and quality of life, but not mood [14]. In 16 adults, positive affect did not change after 15 minutes at 10°C, and negative affect was lower at 180 minutes (p < 0.001) [15]. In 33 adults, a 5-minute immersion was followed by feeling more active, alert, attentive, proud and inspired, and less distressed and nervous [19]. Among 722 outdoor swimmers surveyed, a positive impact on mental health conditions was 44.32 times more probable than no impact [20].
- Population
- Healthy adults in 11 trials [14]. 16 healthy adults [15]. 33 adults aged 20 to 45 [19]. 722 self-selected outdoor swimmers [20].
- Sources
- [14], [15], [19], [20]
- Caveats
- The positive studies had no control condition, and participants chose to take part in a cold water study. The survey authors state it cannot show cause [20].
Depression
Limited evidence: a case report and a feasibility study in which 5 of 13 patients attended regularly describe improved well-being with cold water swimming. No controlled trial was located.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an open-label feasibility study of twice-weekly group cold water swimming added to usual depression treatment, 13 patients were recruited and 5 took part regularly. Their well-being score rose from 39.2 to 54.0 [21]. A case report describes a 24-year-old woman with major depressive disorder whose symptoms eased with weekly open water swimming and who was medication-free a year later [22].
- Population
- 13 outpatients with depression aged 20 to 69 [21]. One patient [22].
- Sources
- [21], [22]
- Caveats
- No control group, six people in total with outcome data, and swimming outdoors in a group adds exercise, nature and company to the cold.
Mood
Mixed results: one sham-controlled study of 40 adults found 1 hour grounded lifted mood, while a 12-week pilot found anxiety and depression did not differ from sham.
Compared with sham grounding [7][1]; weeks without grounding, in the same people [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a double-blind pilot, pleasant and positive mood improved after 1 hour of grounding in a recliner and did not improve with sham grounding [7]. Massage therapists reported less depressed mood while grounded [3]. In patients with mild Alzheimer's disease, Beck Anxiety and Beck Depression scores did not change significantly with grounding compared with sham [1].
- Population
- 40 adults [7]. 16 massage therapists [3]. 15 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease [1].
- Sources
- [7], [1], [3]
- Caveats
- Very small studies with short exposures. The 40-person study was by a researcher who has worked as a contractor for the sponsoring company [7][4].
PTSD
Mixed results: one unblinded trial in 35 veterans found lower PTSD scores after 60 sessions, and pooled sham-controlled military data showed a trend that did not reach significance.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD, clinician-rated PTSD scores improved after 60 daily sessions and did not change in controls (net effect size 1.64, P < 0.0001), with gains in depression scores [14]. In pooled data from four sham-controlled Department of Defense studies of post-concussion symptoms, the PTSD Checklist score changed by -2.7 points (95% CI -5.8 to 0.4, p = 0.09) in favor of hyperbaric oxygen [5]. Two of those trials individually found no difference from sham on the same checklist [3][4].
- Population
- 35 veterans randomized, 29 completed, control group untreated [14]. 254 service members [5].
- Sources
- [14], [5], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The positive trial had no sham, and its participants knew their group [14]. The military trials enrolled people for post-concussion symptoms, not PTSD alone.
Depression
Mixed results: one sham-controlled trial found lower depression scores for 6 weeks after a single whole-body hyperthermia session, and a later trial found no advantage over sham.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 30 adults with major depressive disorder, a single session of whole-body hyperthermia lowered Hamilton depression scores against sham by 6.53 points at week 1 (95% CI -9.90 to -3.16) and 4.27 points at week 6 (95% CI -7.94 to -0.61) [16]. In 30 adults who all received cognitive behavioral therapy, Beck Depression Inventory scores fell 19.07 points with infrared hyperthermia and 21.10 points with sham [17]. A systematic review of 7 studies (148 people) found effect sizes of 0.8 or more on 19 of 21 endpoints [18]. In 28 mildly depressed inpatients, 20 far-infrared sessions improved somatic complaints, hunger and relaxation scores against no thermal therapy, and mental complaints only slightly (p = .054) [19].
- Population
- Medically healthy adults aged 18 to 65 with major depressive disorder, off psychotropic medication [16]. 30 adults with major depressive disorder [17]. 148 people in 7 studies, 4 using infrared heating and 3 hot baths [18]. 28 inpatients [19].
- Sources
- [16], [17], [18], [19]
- Caveats
- Whole-body hyperthermia is a supervised procedure that raises core temperature, not an ordinary sauna visit. After treatment, 93.8% of the heated group and 71.4% of the sham group believed they had received heat [16]. In the later trial every heated participant guessed correctly, and its authors judged the sham not fully credible [17]. Three of the 7 reviewed studies had no control group [18].
School mindfulness lessons for teenagers
One trial of 8,376 students aged 11 to 14 found school mindfulness lessons did not lower risk for depression or raise well-being at 1 year.
Compared with usual social-emotional teaching [22]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against teaching as usual, the standardized mean differences at 1 year were 0.005 (95% CI -0.05 to 0.06) for depression risk, 0.02 for social-emotional-behavioral functioning and 0.02 for well-being. No intervention-related adverse events were observed [22].
- Population
- 8,376 students aged 11 to 14 in 84 UK schools [22].
- Sources
- [22]
- Caveats
- Ten classroom lessons for whole year groups, not an 8-week course people chose to join [22].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 8,376 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Daily life
Depressive symptoms
Shown to reduce depressive symptoms with gardening and horticultural activities in two meta-analyses of trials, a moderate effect. A third found no significant mental health change in chronic illness.
Compared with comparison groups with no horticultural element [1]; control groups in randomized trials the abstract does not describe [2]; control groups in randomized and quasi-experimental studies [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Horticultural activities reduced depressive symptoms (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.47, I² 54%), with similar effects in younger and older adults, indoors and outdoors, and once or twice a week [1]. Group-based gardening may reduce depressive symptoms, with uncertainty from heterogeneity and unclear risk of bias [2]. In adults with chronic conditions, the pooled effect on mental health was not significant (SMD -0.31, 95% CI -0.97 to 0.34) [3].
- Population
- 2,071 community-dwelling adults in 30 studies, 25 pooled [1]. 20 completed randomized trials [2]. 4,535 adults with chronic conditions in 23 studies, mean age 54.4 [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Participants knew they were gardening, and most studies had a high risk of bias [1]. Programs often bundled gardening with group contact and time outdoors, so the share due to gardening is unknown.
Wellbeing and quality of life
Shown to raise wellbeing and other health measures with gardening in two meta-analyses, moderate effects, across trials and comparisons of gardeners with non-gardeners.
Compared with the same people before they began gardening, or non-gardeners [4]; comparison groups in the interventional and observational reviews it pooled [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 76 comparisons, gardening had a positive effect on health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, body mass index, life satisfaction, quality of life and sense of community (mean effect 0.42, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.48), which held after adjusting for publication bias [4]. Gardening and horticultural therapy raised wellbeing (effect size 0.55, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.87) [5].
- Population
- 22 studies published after 2001, mostly from the US [4]. 40 reviews [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was significant (I² 40.47%) and publication bias was present [4]. The umbrella review pooled earlier reviews that overlap, and its authors caution against clinical conclusions [5].
Depression and anxiety symptoms in trials
Shown to lower depression and anxiety symptoms by a medium amount in trials across many groups, including people with major depression, in reviews rated low in quality.
Compared with usual care [13]; active controls such as usual care or a placebo tablet [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 97 reviews, physical activity had medium effects on depression (median effect size -0.43), anxiety (-0.42) and psychological distress (-0.60, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.42), with larger effects at higher intensity [13]. In major depression, walking or jogging (g -0.62, 95% credible interval -0.80 to -0.45) and mixed aerobic exercise (g -0.43) reduced symptoms, with effects in proportion to the intensity prescribed [14].
- Population
- 128,119 participants in 1,039 trials within 97 reviews [13]. 14,170 people with major depression in 218 trials [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Most reviews were rated critically low in quality [13]. Only one depression trial was at low risk of bias, and participants could not be blinded [14].
Later school start times in teenagers
Shown to lengthen teenagers' sleep by about 25 to 77 minutes a night when school started later, in three reviews. Depressive symptoms fell slightly in pooled studies.
Compared with earlier school start times, as each study compared them [2]; the same students before the delay, and control schools in trials [3]; earlier school start times [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Six studies found later start times linked to more sleep. One study found fewer depressive symptoms, and results for alertness and absences were mixed. The evidence was rated very low in quality [2]. Start times delayed by 25 to 60 minutes were followed by 25 to 77 more minutes of sleep per weeknight, with some studies reporting less daytime sleepiness, depression and caffeine use [3]. Pooled, delayed start times added an average 69 minutes of sleep (SMD 0.63) and lowered depressive symptoms slightly (SMD -0.20) [4].
- Population
- 297,994 students aged 13 to 19 in 11 studies [2]. 6 studies, 2 of them randomized [3]. Middle and high school students in 6 studies [4].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Most studies were not randomized and were at high or unclear risk of bias [2]. Heterogeneity was high [4]. Whether the extra sleep lasts was not shown. One study reported less parent and child time [2].
Programs to reduce loneliness
Shown to reduce loneliness modestly in pooled randomized trials. Programs addressing how people think about social situations had the largest effects, and added chances to socialize did not.
Compared with control groups in randomized comparison studies [11]; control groups [12]; control groups in randomized trials, some without active controls [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 20 randomized studies, interventions reduced loneliness by a small mean effect size of -0.198 (95% CI -0.32 to -0.08). Social cognitive training had the largest effect (-0.598), social support programs a smaller one (-0.162), and programs adding chances to socialize (-0.062, p = 0.67) or teaching social skills (0.017) showed none [11]. Psychological interventions, most often cognitive behavioral therapy, reduced loneliness against control groups (g 0.43) [12]. In older adults, most interventions had small effects, and the evidence was rated very low in quality [13].
- Population
- 50 interventions, 20 randomized [11]. 3,039 participants in 28 randomized trials across ages [12]. 4,592 adults aged 55 to 100 in 44 trials [13].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was considerable [12][13]. Pre-post and non-randomized studies gave larger effects than randomized ones [11]. These trials measured loneliness, not death, heart disease or dementia.
Depression and anxiety symptoms
Shown to lower depressive symptoms by a moderate amount and anxiety by a small amount in pooled trials, with smaller effects in trials with blinded assessment.
Compared with nonactive control conditions [17][18]; active controls such as usual care or a placebo tablet [19]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Resistance training reduced depressive symptoms (effect size 0.66, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.83), a number needed to treat of 4, regardless of health status or training volume [17]. It reduced anxiety symptoms (effect size 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.44), more in healthy people (0.50) [18]. In major depression, strength training reduced symptoms (g -0.49, 95% credible interval -0.69 to -0.29) and was among the options people tolerated most [19].
- Population
- 1,877 participants in 33 trials [17]. 922 participants in 16 trials [18]. 643 people with major depression in 22 strength training arms [19].
- Sources
- [17], [18], [19]
- Caveats
- Trials with blinded allocation or assessment found smaller effects [17]. Confidence in the depression network results was rated very low for strength training [19].
Mood, anxiety and depressive feelings
Shown to ease negative mood, anxiety and depressive feelings and raise positive mood after time in nature, in several meta-analyses rating study quality mostly low.
Compared with control conditions, mostly passive [7]; control groups [8]; built environments [9]; before the forest bathing, in the same people [6]; a 90-minute walk in an urban setting [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 30 reviews, nature-based programs lowered anxiety (SMD -0.83, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.47), depressive symptoms (SMD -0.72) and negative affect (SMD -0.61), and raised positive affect (SMD 0.52). Physiological measures did not rise significantly (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.67) [7]. An umbrella review found lower tension (SMD -0.87) and negative affect (SMD -0.51) and higher positive affect (SMD 0.98) and wellbeing (SMD 0.40), at moderate credibility [8]. Short visits to natural settings had a small effect on depressive mood (mean g -0.29) [9]. After forest bathing, tension-anxiety and depression-dejection scores fell [6]. A 90-minute nature walk lowered rumination and activity in a brain region tied to it, and an urban walk did not [10].
- Population
- 3,870 primary studies in 30 reviews [7]. 344 studies in 28 reviews [8]. 33 studies [9]. 11 studies [6]. Healthy adults in one trial [10].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9], [6], [10]
- Caveats
- Most primary studies used passive controls, short follow-up and self-report, and were rated at high risk of bias [7][9]. Only 10 of 91 associations had moderate credibility [8]. Heterogeneity was large [9].
Purpose in life and depression
Linked to fewer depressive and anxiety symptoms in people with a stronger sense of purpose in life, in two meta-analyses, moderate correlations.
Compared with people with a lower sense of purpose in life [13][14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Purpose in life correlated with lower depression (r -0.49, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.45) and lower anxiety (r -0.36) [13]. In 71 of 72 samples, purpose was linked to fewer depressive symptoms (estimate -0.32, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.30), and each standard deviation more purpose to lower odds of severe distress (OR 0.53) [14].
- Population
- 66,468 people in 99 samples [13]. 531,038 participants in 72 samples across six world regions [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Mostly measured at one time, so depression lowering purpose is as likely as the reverse. The two concepts overlap in how they are asked about.
Depressive symptoms
Linked to 22% fewer people with depressive symptoms at 7,000 steps a day than at 2,000, in one meta-analysis of three cohorts.
Compared with 2,000 steps a day [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against 2,000 steps a day, 7,000 steps was linked to a 22% lower risk of depressive symptoms (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.83), with a linear pattern. Certainty was rated moderate [4].
- Population
- 3 cohort studies [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Observational and only three studies. Low mood itself lowers activity, so reverse causation is likely in part.
Depression in cohorts
Linked to 18% less depression at half the guideline amount and 25% less at the guideline amount, in one meta-analysis of cohorts, with smaller gains beyond.
Compared with adults reporting no activity [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against no activity, half the guideline volume (4.4 mMET-hours a week) was linked to 18% lower risk of depression (95% CI 13% to 23%) and the guideline volume (8.8 mMET-hours a week) to 25% lower risk (95% CI 18% to 32%), with diminishing returns and more uncertainty above that [15].
- Population
- 191,130 adults in 15 cohorts, followed at least 3 years [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- Observational, with large heterogeneity (I² 74%). Low mood lowers activity, which is reverse causation.
Depression
Linked to more new depression at both short and long sleep in one meta-analysis of seven cohorts.
Compared with people with normal sleep duration [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Short sleep was linked to a 31% higher risk of depression (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.64) and long sleep to a 42% higher risk (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.92), with no heterogeneity (I² 0%) [9]. A larger review found too little usable data to pool depression [3].
- Population
- 25,271 participants for short sleep and 23,663 for long sleep in 7 prospective studies [9].
- Sources
- [9], [3]
- Caveats
- Observational and few studies. Disturbed sleep is itself a symptom of depression, so early illness may change sleep before diagnosis, which is reverse causation.
Mood after sleep loss
Shown to lower positive mood and raise negative mood when sleep was cut or skipped, in one meta-analysis of 64 experimental studies.
Compared with control conditions the source does not describe [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Sleep loss had a large negative effect on positive mood (g -0.94) and a moderate effect raising negative mood (g 0.45). Total sleep deprivation raised negative mood more than partial restriction. Sleep restriction had a small negative effect on adaptive emotion regulation (g -0.32) [10].
- Population
- 241 effect sizes from 64 studies, from early childhood to late adulthood [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Short experimental studies of acute loss. They do not show what years of habitual short sleep do to mood. The emotion regulation studies were all in young people [10].
Mood after quitting
Linked to small improvements in depression, anxiety and stress after quitting, in a Cochrane review of mostly cohort data rated very low to moderate in certainty.
Compared with people who continued to smoke [19]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against continuing to smoke, quitting was linked to lower anxiety (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.13), depression (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.21), mixed anxiety and depression (SMD -0.31) and stress (SMD -0.19), and more positive affect (SMD 0.22). New mixed anxiety and depression was less common in quitters (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86). Results were similar in people with mental illness [19].
- Population
- 102 studies with over 169,500 adults who smoked, followed at least 6 weeks [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- All studies were judged at serious risk of bias from confounding that changes over time, and there was some sign of publication bias [19]. People whose mood improves may find it easier to quit, which is reverse causation.
Depression
Linked to more depression with loneliness, a moderate effect in one meta-analysis of 88 studies and a positive link in all ten longitudinal studies of older adults in a review.
Compared with people with lower loneliness scores [8]; less lonely older adults [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Loneliness had a moderate, significant effect on depression across 88 studies, unchanged by sample, publication type or year [8]. All 10 longitudinal studies in older adults found loneliness linked to later depressive symptoms, with odds ratios from 0.41 to 17.76 [9].
- Population
- 40,068 people in 88 studies [8]. Older adults in 10 longitudinal studies [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Most of the larger review's studies measured both at one time, and its abstract gives no pooled size [8]. Depression also makes people withdraw and feel lonely, so the direction runs both ways. The longitudinal review did not pool its results [9].
Blue spaces: coasts, lakes and rivers
Linked to more physical activity and restoration with more blue space nearby or more contact with it, in one meta-analysis. Living closer was not linked to restoration.
Compared with people living farther from, with less, or with less contact with blue space [13]; comparisons the source does not describe [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Living closer to blue space was linked to more physical activity (Cohen's d 0.122). More contact with blue space was linked to more restoration (d 0.191, 95% CI 0.084 to 0.298). Shorter distance was not linked to restoration (d 0.123, 95% CI -0.037 to 0.284) or social interaction [13]. A review of 33 therapeutic blue space programs found mostly positive or weak links with mental health and wellbeing, and very few findings on physical health [14].
- Population
- 50 studies [13]. 33 intervention studies in people with a defined need [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Mostly observational. The program review gave no pooled estimates [14]. Effects are small.
Children's mental health after cutting family screen time
One trial found fewer behavioral and emotional difficulties in children after two weeks of strict family screen limits.
Compared with a control group of families [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The total difficulties score fell by 1.67 points more than in controls (95% CI -2.68 to -0.67, Cohen d 0.53). Emotional symptoms and peer problems fell (-1.03) and prosocial behavior rose (0.84) [5].
- Population
- 181 children, mean age about 9, in 89 Danish families, with leisure screen use cut to 3 hours a week or less for 2 weeks [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- A secondary analysis of one short trial. Parents who knew their group rated their children, and whether the effect lasts is unknown [5].
Shifting night owls to an earlier schedule
One trial moved night owls' sleep and wake times about 2 hours earlier and found less depression and stress and better morning reaction time and grip strength.
Compared with a control group the abstract does not describe [1]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Earlier wake and sleep times, fixed meal times, limits on caffeine and timed exercise advanced sleep and wake timing by about 2 hours, measured by actigraphy, dim light melatonin onset and the cortisol awakening response, with no loss of sleep duration. Self-reported depression and stress improved, and reaction time and grip strength improved in the morning hours [1].
- Population
- Night owls with a late sleep and wake pattern, in one randomized controlled trial in a real-world setting. The abstract does not give the head count or length [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- One small trial. Participants knew their group, and mood and stress were self-rated. The trial changed several habits at once, so it cannot say which mattered.
Mood
One large cohort linked each extra daily hour outdoors in daylight to lower odds of depression and low mood, mostly in cross-sectional analyses.
Compared with each hour less of daylight outdoors a day [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Participants spent a median 2.5 daylight hours outdoors a day. Each extra hour was linked to lower odds of lifetime major depression (95% CI for the odds ratio 0.92 to 0.98), antidepressant use (0.92 to 0.98) and low mood (0.87 to 0.90), and higher odds of happiness (1.41 to 1.48). Longitudinal analyses agreed with smaller effects [10].
- Population
- UK Biobank adults aged 37 to 73, 54% women, over 400,000 analyzed [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Observational, with self-reported time outdoors. People who are depressed go out less, so reverse causation is likely in part, and outdoor time also brings exercise and company.
Weekly time in nature and wellbeing
One national survey linked at least 120 minutes a week in nature to higher odds of good health and wellbeing, with no further gain beyond 200 to 300 minutes.
Compared with people with no nature contact in the past week [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against no nature contact in the past week, 120 to 179 minutes was linked to higher odds of good health (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.92) and high wellbeing (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.40). Benefits peaked at 200 to 300 minutes a week. It did not matter whether the time came in one visit or several [11].
- Population
- 19,806 adults in England, weighted to be nationally representative [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Cross-sectional and self-reported. Healthier, happier people may simply visit nature more, which is reverse causation.
Loneliness
Mixed results: a review linked pets to less social isolation but not clearly to less loneliness before COVID-19. One small study found loneliness fell after getting a dog.
Compared with people without pets [8]; people who delayed getting a dog and people with no plans to get one [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In adults, pet ownership was linked to lower social isolation. Studies of loneliness found no overall significant link before COVID-19, and mostly lower loneliness after it. In children and adolescents, pets were linked to less loneliness. Most studies found no difference between dogs, cats and other pets [8]. After getting a dog, UCLA Loneliness Scale scores fell 8.41 points (95% CI -16.57 to -0.26) at 3 months and 7.12 points (95% CI -12.55 to -1.69) at 8 months, on a 0 to 60 scale [9].
- Population
- 24 observational studies [8]. 71 Australian adults, 17 of whom got a dog [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Only part of the reviewed studies found a link [8]. The controlled study was small, groups were self-selected, and positive and negative mood did not change in dog owners [9].
Mood after cutting social media
Mixed results: one meta-analysis found small gains in well-being from social media breaks, another found none, and breaks shorter than a week went with worse mood.
Compared with control groups the abstract does not describe [1]; control groups in randomized trials [2]; control conditions in experimental studies of social media use [3]; people who kept using social media as usual [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 10 studies, social media abstinence did not change positive affect, negative affect or life satisfaction, and longer breaks did not change this [1]. Across 20 randomized trials, social media breaks had a small positive effect on well-being, and break length changed the effect on negative indicators [2]. A reanalysis of 20 reduction or abstinence studies, drawn from a meta-analysis of 27, found breaks under 1 week went with worse mental health (d -0.175) and breaks of 1 week or longer with better (d 0.156) [3]. In one trial, a 1-week break raised well-being (mean difference 4.9, 95% CI 3.0 to 6.8) and lowered depression (-2.2) and anxiety (-1.7) scores [4].
- Population
- 4,674 participants in 10 studies [1]. 20 randomized trials [2]. 20 experimental studies [3]. 154 adults, mean age 29.6 [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Participants know whether they are on a break, and most studies lasted days to weeks. The reviews differ in which studies they included [1][2].
Mood and depression in volunteers
Mixed results: cohorts linked volunteering to slightly less depression and more wellbeing, but randomized trials reviewed in 2013 did not confirm these benefits.
Compared with non-volunteers, in cohorts and trials [2]; non-volunteers [3]; people who volunteered 0 hours a year [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Cohort studies showed favorable effects on depression, life satisfaction and wellbeing, and experimental studies did not confirm them [2]. In people 65 and older, three studies gave a small effect on depression (SMD 0.12, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.23) [3]. Volunteering 100 hours or more a year was linked to more positive affect, optimism and purpose, and fewer depressive symptoms, less hopelessness and less loneliness, but not to less diagnosed depression or negative affect [4].
- Population
- 40 papers, 5 randomized trials and 17 cohort studies [2]. 3 studies of adults 65 and older [3]. 12,998 US adults over 50 [4].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The pooled effect sat at the edge of no difference [3]. Mood was self-reported, and the trials were few and small [2].
Depression
Not linked to depression in pet owners in a meta-analysis of 21 studies, or in older dog owners in a systematic review.
Compared with people without pets [10]; older adults without a dog [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pet ownership was not linked to depression (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.995 to 1.07). Dog ownership was not linked (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.789 to 1.10), and cat ownership was linked to slightly higher risk (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09) [10]. In community-dwelling adults aged 70 and over, having a dog was not linked to depressive symptoms, and regular contact with a dog was linked to fewer anxiety symptoms [11].
- Population
- 159,322 participants in 21 studies [10]. 25,138 older adults in 5 cross-sectional studies and 1 controlled before-and-after study [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational and mostly cross-sectional. People may get a pet for support when already low, which can hide or reverse a link.
Food and drink
Depression
Linked to 17% to 22% lower risk of depression at the highest fish intake than the lowest, in pooled observational studies.
Compared with the lowest fish consumption [16][17]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 26 studies, the pooled relative risk of depression for the highest against the lowest fish consumption was 0.83 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.93), and 0.84 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.94) in the 10 cohort studies [16]. Across 21 datasets, it was 0.78 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.89), with a linear dose-response [17].
- Population
- 150,278 participants in 26 studies [16]. 255,076 individuals and over 20,000 cases of depression in 31 studies [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Observational, and 16 of the 26 studies in one review were cross-sectional [16]. The other review notes possible confounding from variables the studies did not adjust for [17]. Low mood can change diet, which can run the link backward.
Depression
Linked to 24% lower risk of depression at the highest coffee intake than the lowest, and 8% lower per daily cup, in observational studies.
Compared with the lowest consumption level [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against the lowest level of consumption, the pooled relative risk of depression was 0.757 (95% CI 0.624 to 0.917) for coffee and 0.721 (95% CI 0.522 to 0.997) for caffeine. Each extra cup a day was linked to 8% lower risk (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97) [11].
- Population
- 330,677 participants in 7 studies of coffee, and 38,223 in 8 studies of caffeine [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The review pooled case-control, cohort and cross-sectional studies. People with low mood may drink less coffee, which runs the link backward.
Mood and anxiety
Shown to ease depressive and anxiety symptoms in the short term, in one meta-analysis of 9 small studies of cocoa-rich products.
Compared with control conditions the abstract does not describe [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Cocoa-rich products lowered depressive symptoms (Hedges' g -0.42, 95% CI -0.67 to -0.17) and anxiety symptoms (g -0.49), and improved positive (g 0.41) and negative affect (g -0.47) [7].
- Population
- 9 studies, 5 of a single dose, 2 of 3 days and 2 of more than a week [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Few participants and short studies, so the results do not cover regular intake over months [7].
Mood and energy, the sugar rush
Not shown to lift mood at any point after eating it, in a meta-analysis of 31 studies. Fatigue was higher and alertness lower in the first hour.
Compared with placebo [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 176 effect sizes, carbohydrate had no positive effect on any aspect of mood at any time after eating. In the first hour, it was linked to more fatigue and less alertness than placebo [5].
- Population
- 1,259 participants in 31 studies [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- The review covered carbohydrate in general, mostly sugars, taken in single doses. It does not test daily eating patterns.
Lab markers
Depression
Linked to depression: blood zinc was about 1.85 µmol/L (12 µg/dL) lower in depressed people than in controls across 17 pooled studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis, peripheral blood zinc was 1.85 µmol/L lower in depressed than in control subjects (95% CI -2.51 to -1.19), about 12 µg/dL. The gap was larger in studies of inpatients (-2.54 µmol/L) than in community samples (-0.94 µmol/L), and greater depression severity went with a larger gap [7].
- Population
- 1,643 depressed and 804 control subjects in 17 studies [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Comparisons of people with and without depression at one point in time, so they cannot show which came first. Results differed widely between studies (I² 88%) [7]. The µg/dL figure is converted here.
Symptoms in trials that added T3 to thyroxine for hypothyroidism
Not shown to change pain, mood, fatigue, quality of life, weight or cholesterol when T3 was added to thyroxine in 11 trials of adults with hypothyroidism.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials found no difference between combined T4 and T3 treatment and T4 alone for bodily pain (standardized mean difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.35), depression (0.07, -0.20 to 0.34), anxiety (0.00, -0.12 to 0.11), fatigue (-0.12, -0.33 to 0.09) or quality of life (0.03, -0.09 to 0.15). Body weight and blood lipids did not differ, and adverse events did not differ between regimens [10].
- Population
- 1,216 adults with clinical hypothyroidism in 11 randomized trials [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The trials compared treatments in people already treated for hypothyroidism, and the abstract does not report the free T3 levels reached. Searches ran to September 2005 [10].