← Back

Body map

Reproductive organs and sex hormones

What research found here. What was shown to help comes first, then the risks reported, most common first.

Reproductive organs and sex hormones

Strong several reviews agree · Moderate one review or consistent trials · Limited one or a few small studies · Untested no study in people, listed with what it rests on

Shown to help184

25-hydroxyvitamin DStrongStudied in women

Uterine fibroids

Linked to lower vitamin D in women with uterine fibroids, about 5.5 to 5.9 ng/mL lower than in women without them, in three meta-analyses.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 21 studies, women with fibroids had lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D than controls (mean difference -5.90 ng/mL, I² 97.4%), and 26 of 29 clinical studies reported an association between low vitamin D and fibroids [23]. In observational studies of premenopausal women with fibroids found by ultrasound, levels were lower than in women without fibroids (mean difference -5.50 ng/mL, 95% CI -6.99 to -4.01) and vitamin D deficiency was more common (odds ratio 3.71, 1.90 to 7.24) [24]. In 9 studies, the standardized mean difference was -0.67 (95% CI -0.98 to -0.35), largest in studies from Asia and not significant in two studies from Africa [25].
Population
43 clinical studies within a review of 69 [23]. 23 observational studies with 5,650 participants [24]. 835 women with fibroids and 895 controls in 9 studies [25].
Sources
[23], [24], [25]
Caveats
Observational, with very high heterogeneity between studies. The abstracts do not report adjustment for body weight, season or ancestry, and the studies cannot show whether low vitamin D came before the fibroids [23][24][25].
Antibiotics (common outpatient)Strong

Doxycycline after sex to prevent sexually transmitted infections

Shown to cut chlamydia and syphilis by about three quarters with doxycycline after sex, mostly in men who have sex with men, with a smaller or no effect on gonorrhea.

Compared with standard care without doxycycline [15][16]; no prophylaxis [17]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In people on HIV prevention pills, a sexually transmitted infection was found at 10.7% of quarterly visits on doxycycline 200 mg within 72 hours of sex and 31.9% on standard care (RR 0.34), with similar results in people living with HIV (RR 0.38). Tetracycline-resistant gonorrhea occurred in 5 of 13 cases on doxycycline and 2 of 16 on standard care [15]. Pooled trials found lower chlamydia (RR 0.22) and syphilis (RR 0.24) and a smaller drop in gonorrhea (RR 0.79) [16]. Another meta-analysis found chlamydia (RR 0.35) and syphilis (RR 0.23) lower and no significant effect on gonorrhea (RR 0.90) [17].
Population
501 men who have sex with men and transgender women [15]; 1,278 participants in 3 trials [16]; 1,727 participants in 4 trials, 73% men who have sex with men [17].
Sources
[15], [16], [17]
Caveats
Open-label trials. Long-term effects on resistance remain uncertain [16][17].
AshwagandhaStrong

Testosterone

Shown to raise testosterone in men, by about 57 ng/dL in one review, with no change in women. Rises stayed within physiological ranges.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 20 trials of cognitive and physical outcomes, testosterone rose (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.54, I² 20.8%) [8]. A hormone meta-analysis found testosterone rose by 57.43 ng/dL in men but not in women (5.09 ng/dL), and estradiol did not change [6]. In 57 overweight men aged 40 to 70 with mild fatigue, 8 weeks of an ashwagandha extract was associated with a 14.7% greater rise in salivary testosterone and an 18% greater rise in DHEA-S than placebo. Fatigue, vigor and sexual well-being did not differ between groups [9].
Population
1,249 participants in 20 RCTs [8]. 1,706 adults in 23 RCTs [6]. 57 men, crossover, 43 completed all 16 weeks [9].
Sources
[8], [6], [9]
Caveats
The 57-man trial tested one branded extract and was funded by its maker, Arjuna Natural Ltd [9]. In healthy adults, testosterone rises stayed within physiological ranges [7].
Coenzyme Q10StrongStudied in men

Male fertility and semen quality

Shown to raise sperm count and motility in men with unexplained infertility. Reviews disagree on sperm concentration and on the size of the effect.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 9 studies (781 men) with idiopathic infertility, CoQ10 raised sperm concentration by 10.22 million/mL (95% CI 3.51 to 16.93) and total motility by 4.95 percentage points (95% CI 1.15 to 8.75), and raised the odds of clinical pregnancy (OR 6.02, 95% CI 1.97 to 18.41) [21]. In 8 RCTs (877 men), total sperm count, total and progressive motility and normal morphology were higher on CoQ10, and sperm concentration and semen volume did not change [22]. A network meta-analysis of 16 studies in men with unexplained infertility found CoQ10 improved sperm concentration over placebo [23].
Population
Men with idiopathic or unexplained infertility [21][23]; men in RCTs of semen quality [22].
Sources
[21], [22], [23]
Caveats
One review reported standardized mean differences as large as 13.38, several times the 2.98 reported by the network meta-analysis [23], with significant heterogeneity between studies [22]. The pregnancy interval is wide [21]. The reviews disagree on sperm concentration [21][22].
Endometriosis surgeryStrongStudied in womenVery common

Pregnancy in mild endometriosis, compared with diagnostic laparoscopy

Shown to raise pregnancy rates in women with minimal or mild endometriosis against diagnostic laparoscopy alone: 30.7% against 17.7% reached 20 weeks in the largest trial.

Compared with diagnostic laparoscopy alone [4][8]; placebo, as the network analysis names its comparison [9]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Surgery raised viable intrauterine pregnancy against diagnostic laparoscopy (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.86, 3 trials, 528 women, moderate certainty). No trial in the review measured live birth [4]. In a Canadian trial, 50 of 172 women after resection or ablation and 29 of 169 after diagnostic laparoscopy had pregnancies lasting 20 weeks or more within 36 weeks (cumulative 30.7% against 17.7%, rate ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.1). Fetal loss was 20.6% and 21.6% [8]. A network meta-analysis found higher odds of pregnancy after surgical laparoscopy than placebo (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.35) [9].
Population
528 women in 3 trials [4]. 341 infertile women aged 20 to 39 with minimal or mild endometriosis [8]. 2,245 women with endometriosis-related infertility in 26 trials [9].
Sources
[4], [8], [9]
Caveats
Live birth was not measured in the pooled trials [4]. These trials covered minimal or mild disease only.
Fish oilStrongStudied in women

Period pain

Shown in two reviews to lower period pain more than controls in women with dysmenorrhea, at 300 to 1,800 mg a day for 2 to 3 months.

Compared with control groups the source abstracts do not describe [54][55]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 12 studies (881 women) giving 300 to 1,800 mg of long-chain omega-3 a day for 2 or 3 months, 8 pooled studies showed lower pain (Cohen's d -1.020, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.51). 86% of studies that measured pain medicine use found it fell, and few mild side effects were reported [54]. A second review of RCTs found lower primary dysmenorrhea severity (SMD -1.075, 95% CI -1.871 to -0.279), with smaller effects at higher daily intakes and in older women [55].
Population
881 women with dysmenorrhea in 12 studies [54]; women with primary dysmenorrhea in RCTs [55].
Sources
[54], [55]
Caveats
Most studies were rated neutral in quality [54]. The trials were small and short, and the two reviews share many of them.
FolateStrong

Neural tube defects

Shown to lower neural tube defects about 69% with daily folic acid, including recurrence after an affected pregnancy. 400 µg did as well as higher doses.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Daily folic acid, alone or with other vitamins and minerals, lowered neural tube defects against no folate (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.58, 5 trials, 6,708 births). Recurrence in women with a previous affected pregnancy was also lower (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.64, 4 trials, 1,846 births). The effect did not differ between 400 µg a day and higher doses [1]. A 2026 umbrella review found the same pattern, with RR 0.31 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.60, I² 0%) for neural tube defects at birth and RR 0.30 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.65) for recurrence [2].
Population
7,391 women in 5 trials, 2,033 of them with a previous pregnancy affected by a neural tube defect [1]; systematic reviews of trials and observational studies [2].
Sources
[1], [2]
Caveats
Only one of the five trials was at low risk of bias. The authors graded the main result high quality [1]. The one trial measuring first occurrence alone did not reach significance (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.32) because there were no events in the folic acid group [1]. The two reviews draw on overlapping trials [1][2].
GnRH drugs for fibroidsStrongStudied in womenVery common

Heavy bleeding with fibroids: elagolix with add-back (Oriahnn)

Shown to bring blood loss under 80 mL, with at least a 50% drop, in 69% to 77% of women with fibroids, against 9% to 11% on placebo.

Compared with placebo [5][6][7][8]; elagolix without add-back hormones [5][7]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In Elaris UF-1 and UF-2, 68.5% and 76.5% on elagolix with add-back responded against 8.7% and 10% on placebo, and 84.1% and 77% on elagolix alone [5]. Mean blood loss fell 177 mL and 169 mL against a 1 mL rise and a 4 mL fall on placebo, and 57% and 61% had no bleeding in the final month against 4% and 5% [6]. Pooled, elagolix raised the chance of blood loss under 80 mL (RR 4.81, 95% CI 2.45 to 9.45) and of a 50% drop (RR 4.87) against placebo. Elagolix alone and with add-back did not differ for blood loss under 80 mL (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.16) [7]. A second meta-analysis found the same direction against placebo [8]. In an extension, 87.9% met the end point after 12 months [9].
Population
790 premenopausal women with fibroids and blood loss over 80 mL, median age 43, 68% Black [5][6]; 4 trials with 1,949 women [7]; 4 trials in 1,217 patients [8]; 218 women treated 12 months [9].
Sources
[5], [6], [7], [8], [9]
Caveats
The trials were funded by the manufacturer [5][9]. The two meta-analyses draw on the same pivotal trials [7][8]. The 12-month extension had no placebo arm [9].
Heat therapyStrongStudied in women

Period pain, compared with no treatment

Shown to ease period pain in women against no treatment, by about 1.9 cm on a 10 cm scale over 3 months of use, in pooled trials of low certainty.

Compared with no treatment [3][4]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 25 trials (2,393 women), pain after 3 months was lower with heat than with no treatment (WMD -1.85 cm, 95% CI -2.29 to -1.41). Within 24 hours of a painful period, the difference was larger (WMD -3.52 cm, 95% CI -5.01 to -2.02, 3 trials, 248 women) [3]. An earlier review found one trial of 132 women in which heat lowered pain against no treatment (MD -4.04, 95% CI -4.88 to -3.20) [4].
Population
5,359 women with primary dysmenorrhea in 57 trials [3]. 6 trials [4].
Sources
[3], [4]
Caveats
Women knew whether they were using heat, so expectation can add to the effect. The reviewers judged the evidence low in certainty and write that heat "may" reduce pain [3]. The earlier review's comparison rests on one trial [4].
Heat therapyStrongStudied in women

Period pain, compared with pain medicines

Shown to ease period pain in women as much as, or slightly more than, NSAIDs or acetaminophen, in two reviews of trials.

Compared with NSAIDs [3]; pain medicines [4]; ibuprofen 400 mg three times a day [5]; acetaminophen 1,000 mg [6]

The numbers and sources
Effect
After 3 months, pain was slightly lower with heat than with NSAIDs (WMD -1.10 cm, 95% CI -1.51 to -0.70, 22 trials, 1,938 women), and within 24 hours (WMD -1.50 cm, 95% CI -2.86 to -0.15, 2 trials, 167 women) [3]. Against pain medicines, heating pads lowered pain (SMD -0.72, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.48, 2 trials, 274 women) [4]. Heat with a placebo pill gave mean relief of 3.27 against 3.07 for ibuprofen with an unheated patch. Adding heat to ibuprofen did not raise relief (P = .096) but shortened the time to noticeable relief from 2.79 to 1.5 hours [5]. Against acetaminophen 1,000 mg, a heat wrap gave more relief over 8 hours (2.48 against 2.17, p = 0.015) and less cramping [6].
Population
Women with primary dysmenorrhea in 22 trials [3] and 2 trials [4]. 81 women [5]. 344 women [6].
Sources
[3], [4], [5], [6]
Caveats
The pooled certainty was low [3]. The single-day acetaminophen trial blinded only the investigator [6].
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)StrongStudied in women

Polycystic ovary syndrome

Linked to higher CRP in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, about twice the level of women without it, in two meta-analyses that held after accounting for obesity.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 31 studies, mean CRP was 96% higher in women with PCOS than in controls without it (95% CI 71% to 122%), with no sign of publication bias. The difference persisted after excluding five studies in which body mass or the frequency of obesity differed between the groups. The same review found no difference in interleukin-6 or tumor necrosis factor alpha, in 10 and 9 studies [21]. In 63 studies, CRP was higher in women with PCOS than in controls (standardized mean difference 1.26, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.53), and in 35 higher quality studies that included non-obese women the difference was 1.80 (1.36 to 2.25) [22].
Population
3,648 women, 2,359 with PCOS and 1,289 controls, in 31 studies [21]. 4,086 women with PCOS and 3,120 controls in 63 studies [22].
Sources
[21], [22]
Caveats
Observational comparisons of women with and without the condition, which cannot show which came first. Body weight raises CRP. The reviews dealt with it by setting aside studies with mismatched weight or by analyzing non-obese women, not by adjusting each result for body mass index [21][22].
Hormonal birth controlStrongStudied in women

PMS and PMDD

Shown to ease overall premenstrual symptoms more than placebo, mostly in women with PMDD on a drospirenone pill. Depressive symptoms alone did not clearly differ.

Compared with placebo or another combined pill [30][31]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In two placebo-controlled trials in women with PMDD, a pill with drospirenone 3 mg and ethinyl estradiol 20 µg lowered premenstrual symptom scores after 3 months (MD -7.92, 95% CI -11.16 to -4.67) and eased impairment of productivity, social activities and relationships. Nausea (OR 3.15), bleeding between periods (OR 4.92) and breast pain (OR 2.67) were more common. In a 2-year trial, symptoms on a drospirenone pill matched a desogestrel pill [30]. Across 9 trials (1,205 women), combined pills improved overall premenstrual symptoms more than placebo (SMD 0.41, 95% credible interval 0.17 to 0.67) but not depressive symptoms (SMD 0.22, -0.06 to 0.47), and no pill did better than another [31].
Population
1,920 women in 5 trials [30]; 1,205 women with PMS or PMDD in 9 trials, mean ages 24.6 to 36.5 [31].
Sources
[30], [31]
Caveats
The placebo response was large, and the trials lasted 3 cycles, so longer effects are unknown [30]. Evidence for women with milder symptoms is thin [30].
172 more
IGF-1StrongStudied in women

Breast cancer

Shown in genetic and cohort studies to go with more breast cancer at higher levels, 28% more in the top fifth than the bottom fifth across 17 studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In pooled individual data from 17 prospective studies, women in the highest fifth of IGF-1 had an odds ratio for breast cancer of 1.28 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.44) against the lowest fifth. The association was 1.38 (1.14 to 1.68) for estrogen receptor positive tumors and 0.80 (0.57 to 1.13) for estrogen receptor negative tumors [6]. In UK Biobank, each 5 nmol/L higher IGF-1 had a hazard ratio of 1.11 (1.07 to 1.16), and each 5 nmol/L of genetically predicted IGF-1 had an odds ratio of 1.05 (1.01 to 1.10) [7].
Population
4,790 women with breast cancer and 9,428 matched controls in 12 countries [6]. 206,263 women followed for a median 7.1 years, and genetic data on 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls [7].
Sources
[6], [7]
Caveats
The cohort findings are observational. Genetic estimates describe lifelong differences, not the effect of changing the level later in life. The second study reports IGF-1 in nmol/L, a unit this page does not convert.
InositolStrong

Gestational diabetes prevention

Shown to lower gestational diabetes about 44% to 47% with myo-inositol in pregnant women. One trial in women with PCOS found no change in a combined outcome.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Myo-inositol lowered gestational diabetes (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.90), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.61) and preterm birth (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.70). Cesarean section did not differ [4]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 12 RCTs (4,765 women) found a 44% lower risk of gestational diabetes, with no significant difference in hypertensive disorders, cesarean delivery, macrosomia, preterm birth or newborn low blood sugar [5]. In one Italian trial in overweight women, gestational diabetes occurred in 11.6% on myo-inositol and 27.4% on placebo (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.70) [6]. In a Dutch trial in pregnant women with PCOS, 2 g of myo-inositol twice a day did not lower a composite of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia or preterm birth (25.0% against 26.8%, RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.28) [7].
Population
1,319 women in 7 trials, 6 in Italy and 1 in Ireland [4]; 4,765 pregnant women or women planning pregnancy, without diabetes, in 12 RCTs [5]; 220 overweight, non-obese pregnant women [6]; 464 pregnant women with PCOS at 13 hospitals [7].
Sources
[4], [5], [6], [7]
Caveats
The Cochrane authors rated the evidence low to very low certainty. No trial reported perinatal death [4]. The two reviews agree on gestational diabetes and differ on high blood pressure and preterm birth [4][5]. The overweight trial was open-label [6]. The PCOS trial reported a composite outcome, and the abstract does not give gestational diabetes alone [7].
Keto dietStrongStudied in women

Weight and insulin resistance in PCOS

Shown in pooled studies to lower weight and insulin resistance in women with PCOS. Against other diets, the reviews disagreed on weight.

Compared with other diets [21]; low-calorie diets [22]; before the diet, in the same women [21][22][23]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against other diets, ketogenic diets lowered weight 4.98 kg more (95% CI 0.91 to 9.05), BMI 1.65 kg/m2 more and insulin resistance more (MD -1.71, 95% CI -2.98 to -0.43, I² 90%). From before to after the diet, weight fell 10.77 kg and BMI 3.38 kg/m2 [21]. In 2 RCTs against low-calorie diets, body weight did not differ significantly, while BMI, fat mass, glucose and HOMA-IR fell more on the ketogenic diets [22]. A third review of 7 studies found weight, BMI, glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides fell from before to after the diet [23].
Population
Women with PCOS, most with BMI above 25, in 15 studies, 10 pooled [21]; 10 studies including 3 RCTs, 4 cohorts and 2 case series [22]; 7 studies [23].
Sources
[21], [22], [23]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was high for most outcomes [21]. Before-and-after results cannot separate the diet from weight loss or time. A published letter disputed whether the definition of real-world exposure in [21] matched its inclusion criteria [24].
Letrozole and clomipheneStrongStudied in womenVery common

Live birth in PCOS: letrozole compared with clomiphene

Shown to raise live births in women with PCOS against clomiphene, 27.5% against 19.1% in the largest trial, about one extra birth per 10 women treated.

Compared with clomiphene or other selective estrogen receptor modulators [3]; clomiphene [4][5]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Across 11 trials (2,060 women), live births after ovulation induction and timed intercourse were higher with letrozole than with selective estrogen receptor modulators such as clomiphene (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.11, I² 0%), with a number needed to treat of 10. Where 20% of women would have a live birth on clomiphene, 27% to 35% would on letrozole [3]. A second meta-analysis, with 8 trials reporting live birth, found a risk ratio of 1.49 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.74) [4]. In the PPCOS II trial, 103 of 374 women (27.5%) on letrozole and 72 of 376 (19.1%) on clomiphene had a live birth over up to five cycles (rate ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.87) [5].
Population
2,060 women with anovulatory PCOS in 11 trials, within a review of 41 trials and 6,522 women [3]. 3,952 women with PCOS in 29 trials [4]. 750 women aged 18 to 40 with PCOS, double-blind, at US centers [5].
Sources
[3], [4], [5]
Caveats
The Cochrane review set aside six earlier trials over concerns about the validity of their data, and a funnel plot showed mild asymmetry suggesting some trials favoring the comparison drugs may be missing [3]. The authors of the second review describe the quality of the evidence as mixed [4].
Letrozole and clomipheneStrongStudied in womenVery common

Ovulation and pregnancy in PCOS: letrozole compared with clomiphene

Shown to raise ovulation and pregnancy rates in women with PCOS against clomiphene. In the largest trial, 61.7% of letrozole cycles and 48.3% of clomiphene cycles were ovulatory.

Compared with clomiphene [4][5][6]; clomiphene or other selective estrogen receptor modulators [3]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Ovulation was more frequent with letrozole across 22 trials (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.21) [4] and across 50 trials (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.26), and pregnancy across 50 trials (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.62). The endometrium was thicker on letrozole (SMD 0.89) and fewer follicles developed (SMD -0.56) [6]. In PPCOS II, 834 of 1,352 letrozole cycles (61.7%) and 688 of 1,425 clomiphene cycles (48.3%) were ovulatory [5]. Clinical pregnancy was higher with letrozole across 23 trials (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.98): where 24% would conceive on clomiphene, 32% to 39% would on letrozole [3].
Population
Women with PCOS in 22 trials [4] and 50 trials [6]. 750 women with PCOS [5]. 3,321 women in 23 trials [3].
Sources
[3], [4], [5], [6]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was moderate to high in the 50-trial analysis (I² 54% for ovulation, 66% for pregnancy, 98% for endometrial thickness) [6]. Ovulation and pregnancy are steps toward a live birth, which is reported in the block above.
MetforminStrongStudied in women

Ovulation and pregnancy in PCOS

Shown to raise ovulation and clinical pregnancy rates against placebo in women with PCOS. The rise in live births rests on low-quality evidence.

Compared with placebo or no treatment [30][31]; clomiphene citrate [30]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo or no treatment, metformin raised ovulation (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.85 to 3.75, 13 studies, 684 women, low quality) and clinical pregnancy (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.65, 11 studies, 1,213 women, moderate quality). Live birth rose from 19% on placebo to between 19% and 37% on metformin (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.51, 4 studies, 435 women, low quality). The effect on miscarriage was uncertain (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.35). Against clomiphene citrate, women with obesity had fewer live births on metformin (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.52, 2 studies, 500 women) [30]. A second review found higher odds of clinical pregnancy on metformin than placebo (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.95 to 4.59) [31].
Population
41 RCTs with 4,552 women with PCOS and subfertility [30]; 24 RCTs with 564 women with PCOS given metformin [31].
Sources
[30], [31]
Caveats
Evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate, limited by risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency. Results differed by body mass index [30]. The second review's abstract does not say how many trials reported pregnancy [31].
MetforminStrongStudied in women

Weight in PCOS

Shown to lower BMI slightly more than placebo in women with PCOS, by about 0.5 to 0.8 kg/m2, or about 3 kg of body weight.

Compared with placebo [34][31]; lifestyle change with or without placebo [33]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo, metformin with or without lifestyle change lowered BMI by 0.53 kg/m2 more (95% CI 0.12 to 0.95, moderate certainty) and waist-hip ratio by 0.02 more (low certainty) [34]. A second review found 3.13 kg more weight lost (95% CI 0.93 to 5.33) and BMI 0.82 kg/m2 lower (95% CI 0.41 to 1.22) than placebo [31]. Lifestyle change plus metformin lowered BMI 0.73 kg/m2 more than lifestyle change with or without placebo over 6 months (95% CI 0.32 to 1.14). Metformin alone gave similar weight and BMI to lifestyle change [33].
Population
RCTs in women with PCOS published through July 2022 [34]; 24 RCTs with 564 women given metformin [31]; 12 RCTs with 608 women [33].
Sources
[34], [31], [33]
Caveats
The differences are small. Trials were small and short [33]. The 2023 review was written to inform the international PCOS guideline [34].
MetforminStrongStudied in women

Insulin resistance and blood sugar in PCOS

Shown to lower insulin resistance and fasting glucose slightly against placebo in women with PCOS. Added to lifestyle change, one review found no extra effect.

Compared with placebo [34][31]; lifestyle change with or without placebo [33]; combined oral contraceptive pills [35]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo, metformin lowered HOMA-IR by 0.50 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.91) and fasting glucose by 0.13 mmol/L (95% CI 0.07 to 0.19), both moderate certainty [34]. A second review also found lower fasting glucose than placebo (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.06) [31]. Lifestyle change plus metformin did not differ from lifestyle change with or without placebo on surrogate markers of insulin resistance or fasting glucose after 6 months [33]. Against combined oral contraceptive pills, metformin lowered insulin by 27.12 pmol/L (95% CI 13.59 to 40.65) [35].
Population
RCTs in women with PCOS published through July 2022 [34]; 24 RCTs with 564 women given metformin [31]; 12 RCTs with 608 women [33]; 36 RCTs in women with PCOS [35].
Sources
[34], [31], [33], [35]
Caveats
The changes are small. The add-on comparison rests on small, short trials [33].
NSAIDsStrongStudied in womenVery common

Period pain

Shown to relieve period pain more than placebo, with moderate or excellent relief in 45% to 53% of women against 18% on placebo.

Compared with placebo [24][25]; paracetamol [24]; other NSAIDs and aspirin [24][25]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In primary dysmenorrhea, NSAIDs gave more pain relief than placebo (OR 4.37, 95% CI 3.76 to 5.09, 35 RCTs, low-quality evidence). If 18% of women on placebo got moderate or excellent relief, 45% to 53% on NSAIDs would. NSAIDs also relieved pain more than paracetamol (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.43, 3 RCTs). No single NSAID was shown to relieve pain more or cause fewer side effects than another [24]. A network meta-analysis of 13 drugs found most gave more pain relief than aspirin, and ketoprofen, naproxen, rofecoxib and ibuprofen scored higher than placebo on overall assessment [25].
Population
80 RCTs with 5,820 women with primary dysmenorrhea, comparing 20 NSAIDs [24]; 72 RCTs with 5,723 patients [25].
Sources
[24], [25]
Caveats
The Cochrane authors rated most evidence low quality because study methods were poorly reported. 59% of trials were commercially funded and 31% did not state funding [24].
PDE5 inhibitorsStrongStudied in menVery common

Erections and intercourse success

Shown to raise intercourse success to about 69% against 35% on placebo in men with erectile dysfunction, with no difference between sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Intercourse success was 69.0% on PDE5 inhibitors and 35.0% on placebo. Improved erections were reported by 67% to 89% on treatment and 27% to 35% on placebo. In head-to-head trials, sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil did not differ [1]. A network meta-analysis found sildenafil 50 mg had the greatest efficacy of starting doses and tadalafil 10 mg had the lowest overall adverse event rate [2].
Population
RCTs of men with erectile dysfunction, mostly 12 weeks or shorter [1]; 82 trials with 47,626 men for efficacy [2].
Sources
[1], [2]
Caveats
Many trials were of low methodological quality and short [1]. [1] was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Physical activityStrongStudied in women

Period pain in trials

Shown in two reviews of trials to lower period pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea, by about 2 to 2.5 cm on a 10 cm pain scale.

Compared with no treatment [23]; mefenamic acid in one trial [23]; comparators of any kind, not described in the source abstract [24]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against no exercise, exercise lowered period pain (SMD -1.86, 95% CI -2.06 to -1.66, 9 RCTs, 632 women, low-quality evidence), about 25 mm on a 100 mm scale. Whether adverse events differed was uncertain [23]. A second review found pain intensity 1.89 cm lower on a visual analogue scale (95% CI 1.09 to 2.96) and pain lasting 3.92 hours less (95% CI 2.97 to 4.86), with moderate-quality evidence for intensity [24].
Population
854 women with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea in 12 trials, 754 pooled [23]; 1,681 women in 15 RCTs, 11 pooled [24].
Sources
[23], [24]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was high in both reviews, and no trial compared exercise with an attention control [23][24]. Trials used stretching, core work, yoga, Zumba or aerobic training, about 45 to 60 minutes three or more times a week [23].
Progestins for endometriosis and heavy bleedingStrongStudied in women

Endometriosis pain, compared with placebo

Shown to ease pain in women with endometriosis against placebo, by 2.58 points on a visual analogue pain scale for oral progestins in pooled trials.

Compared with placebo or no treatment, pooled together [5]; placebo [6][7][8]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo or no treatment, oral progestins lowered overall pain at six months (MD -2.58, 95% CI -3.13 to -2.03, moderate certainty) and period pain at three months (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.70), while pelvic pain at three months did not differ (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.69). Quality of life rose (SF-36 MD 4.11, 95% CI 2.41 to 5.82, high certainty) [5]. A network meta-analysis found dienogest superior to placebo for pelvic pain outside periods and for pain during sex [6]. In a 12-week placebo-controlled trial, pain on a 100 mm scale fell 27.4 mm with dienogest 2 mg and 15.1 mm with placebo, a difference of 12.3 mm [7]. In a 24-week trial in China, the difference was 24.54 mm (95% CI 19.15 to 29.93) [8].
Population
8 trials of oral progestins against placebo or no treatment, within a review of 33 trials and 5,059 women with endometriosis confirmed at laparoscopy [5]. 3,259 women in 8 trials [6]. 198 women aged 18 to 45 in Germany, Italy and Ukraine [7]. 255 Chinese women aged 18 to 45 [8].
Sources
[5], [6], [7], [8]
Caveats
The Cochrane comparison pools placebo and no-treatment arms, so it mixes a blinded comparison with an unblinded one [5]. Pain fell 15.1 mm on placebo alone in the 12-week trial [7]. The review notes that few trials report each outcome [5].
Testosterone therapyStrong

Sexual function in postmenopausal women

Shown to raise satisfying sexual events, desire, arousal and orgasm, and lower sexual distress, in postmenopausal women. Long-term data are limited.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Compared with placebo or a comparator, testosterone raised satisfying sexual event frequency by a mean of 0.85 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.18), desire by an SMD of 0.36 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.50), arousal by 0.28 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.35) and orgasm by 0.25 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.32), and lowered sexual distress by an SMD of -0.27 (95% CI -0.36 to -0.17) [6]. A 2026 systematic review reported improved desire with transdermal testosterone in postmenopausal trials, including one of more than 800 women. In two premenopausal trials of 31 to 261 women, libido, satisfying sexual events and satisfaction improved [7].
Population
36 blinded RCTs with 8,480 participants, at least 12 weeks long, analyzed in postmenopausal women [6]; 33 studies, including 7 RCTs in postmenopausal and 2 in premenopausal women [7].
Sources
[6], [7]
Caveats
No effects were found on body composition, musculoskeletal measures or cognition, but few women contributed data to those outcomes [6]. The 2026 review was not pooled, and androgen levels and long-term safety were inconsistently reported [7]. Long-term data are limited.
Thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO antibodies)Strong

Miscarriage and preterm birth

Linked to more miscarriage and preterm birth in women with normal thyroid function, with preterm birth in 6.6% of antibody-positive women against 4.9%.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A meta-analysis of women with normal thyroid function found an odds ratio for miscarriage with thyroid autoantibodies of 3.90 in 19 cohort studies (95% CI 2.48 to 6.12) and 1.80 in 12 case-control studies (1.25 to 2.60). The odds ratio for preterm birth was 2.07 (1.17 to 3.68) [10]. In pooled individual data on 47,045 pregnant women, preterm birth occurred in 6.6% of TPO antibody-positive women and 4.9% of antibody-negative women (odds ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.56) [11]. A pooled analysis of 11,212 pregnant women found the association with premature delivery rose with the antibody concentration [6].
Population
31 studies with 12,126 women for miscarriage and 5 studies with 12,566 women for preterm birth [10]. 47,045 pregnant women in 19 cohorts, of whom 7.5% were TPO antibody positive [11]. 11,212 pregnant women in Dutch birth cohorts [6].
Sources
[10], [11], [6]
Caveats
Observational. Each study applied its own assay and cutoff, so a positive result does not mean the same level across studies.
Tranexamic acidStrongStudied in womenVery common

Heavy menstrual bleeding, against placebo

Shown to cut menstrual blood loss by about 47 to 53 mL a cycle more than placebo in women with heavy periods, about a 40% drop on the approved dose.

Compared with placebo [1][2][3][4][5]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Against placebo, antifibrinolytics cut mean blood loss by 53.20 mL a cycle (95% CI 43.70 to 62.70, 4 RCTs, 565 women) and raised the share of women who improved (RR 3.34, 95% CI 1.84 to 6.09). If 11% improve without treatment, 43% to 63% improved on an antifibrinolytic [1]. A 2026 review found blood loss fell 47.0 mL more than on placebo (95% CI 37.4 to 56.6, 6 trials, I² 13%) [2]. In a network meta-analysis of first-line treatments, tranexamic acid cut blood loss by 80.32 mL a cycle against placebo (95% CI 32.98 to 127.67, moderate certainty) [3]. In the label trials, 3,900 mg a day cut blood loss by 65 mL (39%) against 7 mL (5%) on placebo over 3 cycles, and by 66 mL (38%) against 18 mL (12%) over 6 cycles. A 1,950 mg dose did not meet the trial's success criteria [4]. In the 6-cycle trial the drop was 69.6 mL (40.4%) against 12.6 mL (8.2%) [5].
Population
Women of reproductive age with heavy menstrual bleeding in 13 RCTs (1,312 analyzed) [1]; 17 trials of women with heavy or abnormal uterine bleeding [2]; 26 studies with 1,770 participants in the first-line network [3]; 294 and 187 evaluable women with blood loss of 80 mL or more a cycle, mean age about 40, 40% with fibroids [4][5].
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
Caveats
The Cochrane review rated the evidence very low to moderate quality, mainly for lack of blinding and poor reporting [1]. Women using hormonal contraception were excluded from the label trials [4].
Ulipristal acetateStrongStudied in womenVery common

Heavy bleeding with fibroids, against placebo

Shown to control fibroid bleeding in about 91% of women against 19% on placebo, with amenorrhea in 47% to 82% against 2% to 6%, over 12 to 13 weeks.

Compared with placebo [1][2][3][4]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In anemic women with heavy bleeding, 13 weeks of ulipristal controlled bleeding (a PBAC score under 75) in 91% on 5 mg and 92% on 10 mg against 19% on placebo, with amenorrhea in 73% and 82% against 6% [1]. In a US trial, amenorrhea occurred in 47.2% on 5 mg and 58.3% on 10 mg against 1.8% on placebo [2]. Pooled across SPRM trials, amenorrhea rose from 29 per 1,000 on placebo to 237 to 961 per 1,000 (OR 82.50, 95% CI 37.01 to 183.90, 7 RCTs, 590 women) and patient-reported blood loss fell (SMD -1.11) [3]. A second meta-analysis found amenorrhea against placebo with RR 24.54 (95% CI 10.82 to 55.64, 5 RCTs, 882 participants) [4].
Population
242 women with fibroids, heavy bleeding and hemoglobin of 10.2 g/dL or less [1]; 157 premenopausal women aged 18 to 50 [2]; 14 RCTs of SPRMs with 1,215 women [3]; 6 RCTs with 1,121 participants [4].
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [4]
Caveats
The Cochrane review pooled several SPRMs (mifepristone, ulipristal and asoprisnil), not ulipristal alone [3]. The first trial was funded by PregLem [1].
Vitamin DStrongStudied in women

Period pain

Shown in three reviews to lower period pain more than placebo in women with primary dysmenorrhea, by about 1.1 to 1.6 points on a 10-point scale.

Compared with placebo or standard care [63]; placebo, in trials that had a placebo group [64]; placebo [65]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 8 RCTs (695 participants), vitamin D lowered pain more than placebo (SMD -1.404, 95% CI -2.078 to -0.731), with relief at average weekly doses over 50,000 IU [63]. Across 11 studies (687 participants), pain intensity fell 1.64 points more than in controls (95% CI 1.00 to 2.27, I² 79%), with moderate certainty. Pain fell in primary dysmenorrhea (MD -1.90) but not in the 3 trials of secondary dysmenorrhea [64]. A review of registered trials found pain 1.12 points lower than placebo on a visual analogue scale (95% CI 0.07 to 2.16, 5 studies, 308 participants), in the primary dysmenorrhea trials only [65].
Population
Women with primary dysmenorrhea in 8 RCTs [63]; women with regular periods and primary or secondary dysmenorrhea in 11 RCTs, 7 of them in Iran [64]; 7 registered RCTs in primary dysmenorrhea or endometriosis [65].
Sources
[63], [64], [65]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was high [64][65]. Doses and schedules varied widely, and the registered trials had high or some concerns of risk of bias [65]. The three reviews share many trials.
ZincStrongStudied in women

PMS symptoms

Shown in two reviews to ease PMS symptoms more than placebo, with small to moderate drops in total, emotional and physical symptom scores.

Compared with placebo [20][21]; placebo across the zinc trials reviewed [22]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 4 pooled RCTs, zinc lowered total PMS scores (Hedges's g -0.384) and emotional symptoms (g -0.347) with moderate certainty, and physical symptoms (g -0.512) with low certainty [20]. A second review of 5 studies found better physical health (MD 3.69, 95% CI 1.65 to 5.74) and fewer physical symptoms (MD -0.79, 95% CI -1.39 to -0.20) than placebo, with lower anger, anxiety and tearfulness scores [21]. A narrative review of 31 RCTs found zinc consistently improved psychological PMS symptoms, at 30 mg a day in 60 students and 50 mg a day in 142 women for 3 months [22].
Population
5 RCTs in women of reproductive age, 4 pooled [20]; 5 studies in young women with PMS [21]; 31 RCTs with 3,254 women aged 15 to 50 [22].
Sources
[20], [21], [22]
Caveats
All trials had some concerns for risk of bias, and the trials were few [20]. The two meta-analyses draw on largely the same small set of trials.
AcupunctureModerateStudied in women

Period pain, compared with no treatment or NSAIDs

Shown in low-quality trials to ease period pain more than no treatment or NSAIDs, comparisons in which no one could be blinded.

Compared with no treatment [28][29]; NSAIDs [28][29]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against NSAIDs, more women had pain relief with acupuncture (OR 4.99, 95% CI 2.82 to 8.82, 4 RCTs, 352 women), and adverse events were less common (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.44, 4 RCTs, 239 women). Against no treatment, pain scores were lower with acupuncture in all 6 trials that reported them [28]. At 3 cycles after treatment, pain on a visual analogue scale was 47.80 points lower than with no intervention and 29.89 points lower than with NSAIDs [29].
Population
Women with primary dysmenorrhea in 42 RCTs [28]; 14 RCTs with 970 women [29].
Sources
[28], [29]
Caveats
Evidence was low quality, and 7 trials against NSAIDs were too heterogeneous to pool (I² 94%) [28]. The later review rated the evidence low certainty with high risk of bias [29]. Against sham, no difference was found (see above).
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)ModerateStudied in women

Response to ovarian stimulation in IVF

Linked to the response to IVF stimulation: AMH alone predicted a poor response with an area under the curve of 0.78, against 0.61 for age.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In pooled individual data, age alone predicted a poor response to ovarian stimulation with an area under the curve of 0.61. AMH alone reached 0.78 and the antral follicle count 0.76, and combining the two did not improve on either (0.80, P = 0.19) [13]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine states that the ability of AMH and the follicle count to predict oocyte yield, and poor and excessive responses, has been well demonstrated, and that extremely low AMH values are not a reason to refuse IVF treatment [12].
Population
28 study databases with 5,705 women undergoing IVF [13].
Sources
[13], [12]
Caveats
The finding is for women having IVF. It concerns the number of eggs collected, not whether a pregnancy follows (see the next block).
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)ModerateStudied in women

Age at menopause

Linked to earlier menopause at lower AMH for a woman's age, though AMH alone did not predict the age at menopause with precision.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A systematic review found that studies generally showed lower age-specific AMH associated with an earlier age at menopause. AMH alone could not predict the age at menopause with precision: in women under 40, estimates and confidence intervals ranged from 2 to 12 years. Its predictive value rose with age, as the time to menopause shortened [16]. In one cohort enrolled from 1992 to 2001 and followed to 2013, AMH was the only ovarian reserve test that independently predicted time to menopause (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.86), and it narrowed the spread around the predicted age from 20 to 10.1 years without predicting the earliest or latest ages [17].
Population
41 studies with 28,858 women, 27 of them on the onset of menopause [16]. 155 women with regular cycles aged 21 to 46 at entry, 81 of whom became postmenopausal [17].
Sources
[16], [17], [3], [18], [19]
Caveats
Observational. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists states that more data are needed on AMH as a predictor of time to menopause [3]. The 2024 guideline on premature ovarian insufficiency states that AMH is not the primary diagnostic test for that condition and does not support routine AMH testing to predict it [18]. The 2012 workshop on staging reproductive aging set no AMH figure, citing the lack of standardized assays [19].
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)ModerateStudied in women

Ovarian endometriomas

Linked to lower AMH in women with ovarian endometriomas that had not been operated on, against women without them, in a meta-analysis of 17 studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
AMH was lower in women with unoperated endometriomas than in women without endometriomas (mean difference -0.84, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.52). It was also lower than in women with other benign ovarian cysts (-0.85, -1.37 to -0.32) and than in women with healthy ovaries (-0.61, -0.99 to -0.24) [26].
Population
968 women with endometriomas and 1,874 without, in 17 studies [26].
Sources
[26]
Caveats
Observational. The abstract does not state the unit of the mean differences [26]. It covers endometriomas, the cysts endometriosis forms in the ovary, not endometriosis elsewhere in the pelvis. On this page, AMH tracks the number of eggs collected in IVF more closely than the chance of natural conception.
Antiplatelets: clopidogrel and low-dose aspirinModerateStudied in pregnancyCommon

Preeclampsia prevention in pregnancy

Shown to cut preeclampsia by about 18% with low-dose aspirin in pregnancy, about 1 fewer case per 61 women treated.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Across 60 trials, antiplatelet agents, mostly low-dose aspirin, lowered proteinuric preeclampsia (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88, number needed to treat 61), preterm birth before 37 weeks (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95) and fetal or neonatal death (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.95). Postpartum hemorrhage above 500 mL was probably slightly more frequent (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12) [19].
Population
40,249 women and their babies in 77 trials [19].
Sources
[19]
Caveats
Not a use on the aspirin label read here, which warns against aspirin in the third trimester. See the pregnancy block below.
BremelanotideModerateStudied in women

Sexual desire in premenopausal women with low desire

Shown to raise sexual desire scores by about 0.35 points over placebo on a 1.2 to 6 scale in premenopausal women with low desire.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Over 24 weeks, the desire score rose 0.30 points more than placebo in one trial and 0.42 in the other, 0.35 points across both [1]. On that score, which runs from 1.2 to 6, mean change was 0.5 against 0.2 and 0.6 against 0.2 on placebo [2]. In a 12-week dose-finding trial, the total sexual function score rose 3.6 points against 1.9 on placebo [3].
Population
1,247 premenopausal women with acquired, generalized hypoactive sexual desire disorder, mean age 39, 85.6% white, 96.6% at US sites [1]; 327 premenopausal women with female sexual dysfunction [3].
Sources
[1], [2], [3]
Caveats
The phase 3 trials were funded by Palatin Technologies and AMAG Pharmaceuticals [1]. The score is self-reported. The label limits use to premenopausal women [2].
BremelanotideModerate

Distress about low sexual desire

Shown to lower distress about low desire by about 0.33 points over placebo on a 0 to 4 scale in premenopausal women.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Distress related to low desire fell 0.37 points more than placebo in one trial and 0.29 in the other, 0.33 points across both [1]. On that item, which runs from 0 to 4, mean change was -0.7 on bremelanotide and -0.4 on placebo in both trials [2]. In the dose-finding trial, the total distress score changed by -11.1 against -6.8 [3].
Population
As above [1][3].
Sources
[1], [2], [3]
Caveats
Same trials and funding as the desire outcome.
BupropionModerate

Sexual side effects from other antidepressants

Shown to improve sexual function scores in people with antidepressant-related sexual problems at 150 mg twice daily in three trials, and not at 150 mg once daily.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In three studies in men and women, adding bupropion 150 mg twice daily improved sexual function rating scores against placebo (SMD 1.60, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.81). In two studies of 150 mg once daily, response rates did not differ from placebo (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.09 to 4.41) [17].
Population
People with sexual dysfunction on antidepressants, within a Cochrane review of 23 trials and 1,886 participants [17].
Sources
[17]
Caveats
Not an approved use. Few trials, with the benefit seen only at the higher dose [17].
CalciumModerateStudied in women

PMS symptoms

Shown in several trials to ease PMS symptoms more than placebo. In the largest, total symptom scores fell 48% on calcium and 30% on placebo.

Compared with placebo [21][22]; placebo or usual diet across the trials reviewed [23]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a trial of 1,200 mg of calcium a day as carbonate for 3 cycles, luteal phase symptom scores were lower than on placebo in the second (P = .007) and third (P < .001) cycles. By the third cycle, total symptom scores had fallen 48% from baseline on calcium and 30% on placebo, and all 4 symptom groups (negative mood, water retention, food cravings, pain) were lower [21]. In college students, 500 mg twice a day for 3 months improved early tiredness, appetite changes and depressive symptoms more than placebo [22]. A review of 31 RCTs found that all 4 calcium trials (776 women) reported benefits on PMS symptoms, including a crossover trial of 2,000 mg a day and a trial of calcium-rich food against usual diet [23].
Population
466 women aged 18 to 45 with moderate to severe PMS at 12 US centers [21]; female college students with PMS, mean age 21.4 [22]; 4 trials with 776 women within a review of 31 RCTs [23].
Sources
[21], [22], [23]
Caveats
Only 1 of the 31 trials in the review had a low risk of bias [23]. Trials lasted 2 to 3 cycles.
ClonidineModerateStudied in women

Hot flashes

Shown to reduce hot flashes in menopausal women by about one a day against placebo, an effect smaller than estrogen.

Compared with placebo [10]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across four trials, clonidine reduced daily hot flashes by 0.95 more than placebo (95% CI -1.44 to -0.47) [10].
Population
Menopausal women in 10 clonidine trials, 4 of them pooled for frequency [10].
Sources
[10]
Caveats
Most trials had methodological deficiencies, and the authors state effects are smaller than for estrogen [10].
Cognitive behavioral therapyModerateStudied in women

PMS and PMDD, compared with waiting list or no treatment

Shown in several trials to ease PMS and PMDD symptoms more than a waiting list or no treatment. A 2009 review had found little evidence.

Compared with waiting list [20][22][23]; no intervention [21]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In women with PMDD, 8 weeks of therapist-guided internet CBT improved functional and psychological impairment, interference with everyday life, symptom intensity and symptom disability more than waiting, and the gains held at 6 months [20]. In university students with moderate to severe PMS, internet CBT over 2 cycles lowered total symptom scores to 10.4 against 20.2 with no intervention (adjusted difference -9.9, 95% CI -13.3 to -6.6) and raised quality of life around periods [21]. One-to-one and couple CBT lowered total premenstrual symptoms and distress more than a waiting list [22]. Twelve weekly sessions of cognitive therapy improved symptoms and functioning more than a waiting list [23]. A 2009 review of 7 reports, 3 of them RCTs, found few statistically significant effects [24], while a 2021 review of 32 studies reported symptom reductions in all of them [25].
Population
174 women with PMDD [20]; 92 university students aged 18 to 35 [21]; 83 women with premenstrual disorders, 63 completing [22]; women with PMS referred by doctors [23]; 7 reports [24]; 32 studies [25].
Sources
[20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]
Caveats
Waiting-list and no-treatment controls can inflate effects, and no trial here compared CBT with an attention control or with medication. The 2021 review called for more high-quality research [25].
DHEAModerateStudied in women

Sexual function in menopause

Shown to improve sexual function slightly in menopausal women overall, though oral DHEA alone did not differ from placebo.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Compared with placebo, DHEA improved sexual function by an SMD of 0.31 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.55). Oral DHEA alone showed an SMD of 0.11 (95% CI -0.13 to 0.35), and one intravaginal trial 0.42 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.81) [5].
Population
Peri- and postmenopausal women, 5 trials with 261 women in the main analysis [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
The oral-only result did not differ from placebo. The overall evidence was rated moderate to low quality [5].
DHEAModerateStudied in women

Painful sex and vaginal dryness after menopause

Shown to lower pain during sex and vaginal dryness in postmenopausal women using intravaginal DHEA. This applies to the vaginal form, not oral DHEA.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooled against placebo, intravaginal DHEA lowered dyspareunia scores by a mean difference of -0.40 (95% CI -0.66 to -0.15) and vaginal dryness by -0.23 (95% CI -0.35 to -0.11) [6]. In the largest single trial, daily intravaginal DHEA for 12 weeks reduced pain at sexual activity by 0.36 severity units over placebo and vaginal dryness by 0.27 units over placebo. Parabasal cells fell 27.7% and vaginal pH 0.66 units over placebo. Serum steroids stayed within normal postmenopausal values [7]. In an open-label trial against vaginal estradiol, 92% on DHEA and 82% on estradiol improved by at least 1 point in dyspareunia at 12 weeks (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.00 to 8.25, p = 0.051). Vaginal pH, maturity index and clinical signs of atrophy improved more on estradiol [8].
Population
1,611 postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy in 5 unique RCTs [6]; 482 postmenopausal women (325 on DHEA, 157 on placebo) in one phase 3 RCT [7]; 172 postmenopausal women, mean age 62.4, in the estradiol comparison [8].
Sources
[6], [7], [8]
Caveats
The phase 3 trial was run by the drug's developer, EndoCeutics. The estradiol comparison was open label. This is a local vaginal treatment and does not describe oral DHEA.
DHEAModerateStudied in women

Testosterone and estradiol levels in postmenopausal women

Shown to raise testosterone by about 24 ng/dL and estradiol by about 8 pg/mL in postmenopausal women.

The numbers and sources
Effect
DHEA raised serum testosterone by 24.31 ng/dL (95% CI 15.22 to 33.40) and estradiol by 7.86 pg/mL (95% CI 6.33 to 9.40). Trials using 50 mg a day or more showed larger rises in testosterone (29.65 ng/dL) [10].
Population
Postmenopausal women in 21 RCTs [10].
Sources
[10]
Caveats
These are blood levels, not symptoms or outcomes. Subgroup confidence intervals overlapped [10].
DHEAModerateStudied in women

IVF and ICSI outcomes

Shown to raise clinical pregnancy rates and eggs retrieved in women having IVF or ICSI, on low-quality evidence. Live birth data were insufficient.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In women undergoing IVF or ICSI, DHEA increased endometrial thickness by a mean difference of 0.93 (95% CI 0.27 to 1.60) and clinical pregnancy rate with an OR of 1.34 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.67). Oocytes retrieved rose by 0.73 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.10). Evidence was insufficient to conclude on live birth, ongoing pregnancy or miscarriage [11].
Population
1,973 women in 16 RCTs [11].
Sources
[11]
Caveats
Quality of evidence was rated low to very low, and heterogeneity was linked to disease type, stimulation protocol and when DHEA was started [11].
DIMModerate

Estrogen metabolites and hormone levels

Shown to shift urinary estrogen metabolite ratios in women on tamoxifen, breast cancer survivors and men with prostate cancer. No trial measured cancer outcomes.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 130 women on tamoxifen, 150 mg of DIM twice a day for 12 months raised the urinary 2/16α-hydroxyestrone ratio (+3.2 against -0.7 on placebo, p below 0.001) and raised SHBG by 25 nmol/L against 1.1 [1]. In 19 postmenopausal women after early breast cancer, 108 mg a day for 30 days raised urinary 2-hydroxyestrone and cortisol compared with placebo [2]. In 45 men before prostate surgery, 400 mg a day changed the same urinary ratio compared with placebo [3]. In 23 BRCA carriers taking 100 mg a day for a year, estradiol fell from 159 to 102 pmol/L and testosterone from 0.42 to 0.31 [4].
Population
Women on tamoxifen [1], breast cancer survivors [2], men with prostate cancer [3], BRCA carriers [4].
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [4]
Caveats
These are biomarkers. None of these trials measured cancer outcomes. [4] had no randomized control group.
Endometriosis surgeryModerateStudied in womenVery common

Endometriosis pain, compared with sham surgery

Shown to ease endometriosis pain in women more than a sham diagnostic laparoscopy in two small blinded trials, with 80% against 32% improved after excision.

Compared with diagnostic laparoscopy alone, with the women unaware of their group (sham surgery) [1][2][3][4]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Six months after surgery, 16 of 20 women (80%) reported improvement after full excision and 6 of 19 (32%) after a diagnostic procedure only. Quality of life improved after excision and not after the sham. About 20% did not improve after surgery [1]. In a second trial, 62.5% improved or were free of symptoms 6 months after laser ablation, against 22.6% after diagnostic laparoscopy alone, rising to 73.7% when only mild and moderate disease was counted. Results were poorest for minimal disease [2]. At 1 year, relief continued in 90% of those who first responded [3]. The Cochrane review rated pooled pain data against diagnostic laparoscopy very low in certainty (MD 0.90 at 6 months and 1.65 at 12 months on a pain relief scale, 1 trial of 16 women), and quality of life did not differ (EQ-5D MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.18) [4].
Population
39 women with endometriosis of all stages, crossover design [1]. 63 women with minimal to moderate endometriosis and pain [2][3]. 14 trials and 1,563 women in the review [4].
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [4]
Caveats
Both sham-controlled trials were small. The laser trial also cut the uterine nerves [2]. About 30% improved after the sham alone, a placebo response the authors found was not tied to disease severity [1]. The Cochrane review notes unclear blinding and poor reporting across trials [4].
Endometriosis surgeryModerateStudied in women

Endometriomas: excision compared with drainage and ablation

Shown to lower pain and cyst recurrence in women with endometriomas against drainage and ablation. Endometriomas recurred in 5% to 17% after excision against 37% after ablation.

Compared with drainage and ablation of the cyst [10]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Up to two years after surgery, excision lowered the return of period pain (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.52, 49% after ablation against 10% to 34% after excision) and of pain during sex (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.22, 58% against 4% to 23%). At one year, endometriomas returned less often (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.34) and fewer women needed more surgery (32% after ablation against 3% to 16%). Spontaneous pregnancy in the first year did not differ (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.33 to 4.87) [10].
Population
578 women of reproductive age with endometriomas of at least 3 cm in 9 trials [10].
Sources
[10]
Caveats
Low certainty, with no blinding and small numbers. No trial reported surgical complications other than conversion to open surgery [10].
Endometriosis surgeryModerateStudied in women

Hormonal suppression after surgery, compared with none

Shown to lower endometriosis recurrence in women after conservative surgery when hormonal suppression followed, by about 59% against no treatment or placebo.

Compared with expectant management or placebo after surgery [13]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Recurrence, by imaging or return of symptoms at a median 18 months, was lower with hormonal suppression after surgery (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.65, 14 studies, 1,766 patients, I² 68%). Pain scores were also lower (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.07). Results held for combined hormonal contraceptives and the levonorgestrel IUD, and in analyses limited to randomized trials [13].
Population
2,137 premenopausal women who kept at least one ovary, in 13 randomized trials and 4 cohort studies [13].
Sources
[13]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was substantial. Suppression prevents pregnancy while it is used [13].
EstradiolModerateStudied in women

Breast cancer after menopause

Linked to more breast cancer in postmenopausal women at higher levels, with twice the risk in the top fifth of estradiol against the bottom fifth.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In pooled individual data from nine prospective studies, the relative risks of breast cancer for the second to fifth fifths of estradiol, against the lowest fifth, were 1.42 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.95), 1.21 (0.89 to 1.66), 1.80 (1.33 to 2.43) and 2.00 (1.47 to 2.71). For free estradiol the top fifth had a relative risk of 2.58 (1.76 to 3.78). The increases remained after women diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection were excluded [7].
Population
663 postmenopausal women who developed breast cancer and 1,765 who did not, none taking sex hormones when blood was drawn [7].
Sources
[7], [4]
Caveats
Observational. The Endocrine Society notes that median estradiol in the control women of such studies ran from 5.9 to 27.5 pg/mL from one study to the next, a spread it attributes largely to assay differences, so the fifths are not fixed levels [4]. In a trial of estrogen given alone, breast cancer did not rise (see the trial block below).
Fasting insulin and HOMA-IRModerateStudied in women

Polycystic ovary syndrome

Linked to higher fasting insulin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome than in women without it, in both overweight and non-overweight groups, in one meta-analysis.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 8 studies, fasting insulin was higher in women with PCOS than in women without it (standardized mean difference 0.62, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.88). Compared within weight groups, it was higher in overweight women with PCOS than in overweight women without it (0.65, 0.19 to 1.12, 4 studies), and in non-overweight women with PCOS than in non-overweight women without it (0.47, 0.11 to 0.83, 5 studies). Study means ran from 13.58 to 28.66 µIU/mL in women with PCOS and from 8.00 to 25.6 µIU/mL in women without it [24]. In 28 studies using the insulin clamp, insulin sensitivity was 27% lower in women with PCOS than in controls (99% CI ±6%), independent of body mass index, and a higher body mass index lowered it a further 15% in PCOS [25].
Population
12 studies with 450 participants in all, 8 of them on fasting insulin [24]. 28 clamp studies of premenopausal women with PCOS and controls [25].
Sources
[24], [25]
Caveats
Observational, from small studies, and the overweight comparison rests on 4 of them [24]. Fasting insulin rises with body mass index [8], which is why the comparisons within weight groups matter. The clamp is a research procedure, not a fasting insulin test [25]. Insulin assays differ (see Agreement between insulin assays).
FolateModerate

Miscarriage and pregnancy rate (high dose against standard dose)

Shown to raise pregnancy rates slightly with 4 to 5 mg a day before conception against 0.4 mg. Fewer miscarriages appeared only among women who conceived.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 3 RCTs (5,144 women trying to conceive), 4 to 5 mg a day of folic acid before conception, against 0.4 mg, was linked to fewer miscarriages among the 1,488 who became pregnant (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.94, I² 0%). Counting all randomized women, the reduction was not significant (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.04). Pregnancy rate was higher on the high dose (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18) [15].
Population
Nonpregnant women of reproductive age [15].
Sources
[15]
Caveats
Certainty was rated low to moderate. Restricting to women who became pregnant breaks randomization [15].
FolateModerate

Autism and neurodevelopment in children (use in pregnancy)

Linked to about 30% lower autism risk and lower ADHD odds in children whose mothers took folic acid, in observational studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A 2025 umbrella review of 23 systematic reviews found maternal folic acid linked to lower odds of autism (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.79), ADHD (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.95) and behavioral problems (OR 0.75). Motor, cognitive and language development showed no association [16]. A second umbrella review of 8 meta-analyses (101 studies, over 3 million mother and child pairs) found folic acid linked to 30% lower autism risk (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83) [17].
Population
Mother and child pairs in observational studies [16][17].
Sources
[16], [17]
Caveats
All underlying studies were observational, so they cannot show cause. Half the reviews in [16] were rated very low quality. A 2026 review of excess intake linked high folic acid and high blood folate in pregnancy with adverse neurodevelopment in offspring [18].
Folate levelModerate

Neural tube defects in pregnancy

Shown in trials: folic acid around conception cut neural tube defects about 70%. Risk fell as red cell folate rose, and WHO sets no serum folate threshold.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a Cochrane review, daily folic acid around conception lowered neural tube defects compared with no intervention, placebo or other micronutrients without folic acid (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.58, 5 studies, 6,708 births) [4]. In a trial in women with a previous affected pregnancy, 6 of the 27 affected pregnancies were in the folic acid groups and 21 in the other groups (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.71) [5]. The evidence tying a blood level to risk is for red blood cell folate. In an Irish case-control study, risk fell with early pregnancy red cell folate in a continuous dose-response relationship [6]. A model built on Chinese data estimated 25.4 defects per 10,000 births at a red cell folate of 500 nmol/L and 6 per 10,000 at 1,180 nmol/L [7]. WHO sets red cell folate above 400 ng/mL (906 nmol/L) as the population threshold for women of reproductive age and recommends no serum threshold [2]. One trial analysis estimated that this red cell threshold corresponds to a plasma folate of 25.5 nmol/L (about 11.3 ng/mL), higher in women with low vitamin B12 [8].
Population
5 trials with 6,708 births [4]. 1,817 women with a previous affected pregnancy at 33 centers in 7 countries, 1,195 completed pregnancies [5]. 247,831 participants in a Chinese community intervention and 1,194 in a randomized trial [7]. 1,673 women of reproductive age in northern China [8].
Sources
[4], [5], [6], [7], [2], [8]
Caveats
WHO states that its red cell threshold is for populations and is not to be used to predict an individual's risk, since low folate is not responsible for all neural tube defects [2]. The plasma figure comes from one trial population, was published in nmol/L and is converted here [8].
Free testosteroneModerateStudied in men

Symptoms, physical function and diabetes in men

Linked to sexual symptoms, slower walking and diabetes in men with low calculated free testosterone, including men whose total testosterone was in range.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 3,334 European men aged 40 to 79, the 277 with normal total testosterone and calculated free testosterone below 220 pmol/L were older and in poorer health and reported more sexual and physical symptoms than men with both in range, with lower hemoglobin and bone ultrasound values. The 96 men with low total testosterone and normal free testosterone were younger and more obese and lacked features of androgen deficiency [12]. In three cohorts, men below the 2.5th percentile of a young reference sample for total and free testosterone were more likely to have slow walking speed, difficulty climbing stairs or frailty, and diabetes, than men with normal levels [5]. In the European cohort, the chance of three sexual symptoms rose as free testosterone fell through 160 to 280 pmol/L (46 to 81 pg/mL) [6].
Population
3,334 community-dwelling men aged 40 to 79 in the European Male Aging Study [12]. Men in the Framingham Heart Study, the European Male Aging Study and the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study [5]. 3,369 men aged 40 to 79 [6].
Sources
[12], [5], [6]
Caveats
Cross-sectional, so these studies cannot show which came first. Free testosterone was calculated, not measured, in all three. Two of the three analyses use the same European cohort.
GabapentinoidsModerateStudied in women

Hot flashes

Shown to reduce the frequency and duration of menopausal hot flashes more than placebo on gabapentin, across seven trials.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Women on gabapentin reported a greater reduction than placebo in hot flash frequency (SMD 2.99, 95% CI 2.01 to 3.98), duration (SMD 0.89, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.30) and composite score (SMD 2.31, 95% CI 1.50 to 3.11). Dizziness and unsteadiness were more frequent on gabapentin [17].
Population
Postmenopausal women in 7 placebo-controlled trials [17].
Sources
[17]
Caveats
Not an approved use. The evidence is for gabapentin, from one meta-analysis that does not report the change in number of hot flashes a day in its abstract.
GingerModerateStudied in women

Period pain

Shown to lower period pain scores in women with primary dysmenorrhea when taken in the first 3 to 4 days of the cycle.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 4 placebo-controlled RCTs, ginger during the first 3 to 4 days of the cycle lowered pain scores (reported as -1.85, 95% CI -2.87 to -0.84) [7].
Population
Women with primary dysmenorrhea in 7 RCTs, 4 pooled [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
Four pooled trials. The search included Korean, Chinese and Indian databases [7].
GinsengModerateStudied in men

Erectile function

Shown to raise erectile function scores about 3.5 points on a 30-point scale in men with mild to moderate dysfunction, below the minimal important difference.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 9 studies of 587 men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction, ginseng raised IIEF erectile function scores by 3.52 points (95% CI 1.79 to 5.25) on a 30-point scale, below the 4-point minimal important difference, and by 2.39 points (95% CI 0.89 to 3.88) on a 25-point scale. Self-reported ability to have intercourse improved (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.69) [7].
Population
Men aged 20 to 70, followed up to 12 weeks [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
Certainty was low to moderate, and the Cochrane authors describe the effect on erectile function as trivial [7].
GnRH drugs for fibroidsModerateStudied in womenVery common

Heavy bleeding with fibroids: relugolix combination (Myfembree)

Shown to bring blood loss under 80 mL with at least a 50% drop in about 72% of women with fibroids, against 15% to 19% on placebo, over 24 weeks.

Compared with placebo [1][2]; controls the source abstract does not describe [3]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In LIBERTY 1 and 2, 73% and 71% on relugolix combination therapy responded (blood loss under 80 mL and at least 50% lower), against 19% and 15% on placebo [1]. The label gives 72.1% against 16.8% and 71.2% against 14.7%. Amenorrhea occurred in 50.0% and 50.4% against 6.2% and 3.1%, and mean blood loss fell 82.0% and 84.3% from baseline against 19.1% and 15.1% [2]. A meta-analysis of 6 studies found 31 times the odds of amenorrhea against controls, with 63% of patients reaching amenorrhea [3].
Population
770 premenopausal women with fibroids and blood loss of 80 mL or more a cycle, median age 43, about half Black, for 24 weeks [1][2]; 511 participants in 6 studies [3].
Sources
[1], [2], [3]
Caveats
The pivotal trials were funded by the manufacturer [1]. The meta-analysis pooled relugolix with and without add-back hormones [3].
GnRH drugs for fibroidsModerateStudied in women

Fibroid and uterine size, and surgery: GnRH agonists

Shown to shrink the uterus by about 175 mL before surgery against placebo or no treatment, with fewer transfusions and complications at hysterectomy. Fibroids regrew after stopping.

Compared with placebo or no pretreatment [11]; other medicines before surgery, including ulipristal [11]

The numbers and sources
Effect
GnRH agonists before surgery cut uterine volume by 175.34 mL (95% CI 131.65 to 219.04, 13 studies, 858 women) and fibroid volume by 5.7 to 155.4 mL. At hysterectomy, surgery was 10.11 minutes shorter, blood transfusions were fewer (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.01) and postoperative complications fewer (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91). Before myomectomy, transfusions and complications did not clearly differ. Uterine volume fell 47% on GnRH agonists against 20% and 22% on 5 mg and 10 mg ulipristal [11]. In the label trials, leuprolide cut uterine volume 41% and myoma volume 37%, and mean time back to the pretreatment uterine size was 8.3 months after stopping [10].
Population
41 RCTs with 3,982 premenopausal women having myomectomy, hysterectomy or hysteroscopic resection [11]; women in 4 leuprolide trials, 46 followed after stopping [10].
Sources
[11], [10]
Caveats
Most results are low certainty, from trials with poor reporting and no blinding [11].
hCGModerateStudied in men

Sperm production in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Shown to produce sperm in about 75% of men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, mostly with hCG combined with FSH.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The overall success rate for producing sperm was 75% (95% CI 69 to 81), with a mean sperm concentration of 5.92 million/mL (95% CI 4.72 to 7.13). Success was higher with hCG combined with FSH, and in men with lower baseline gonadotropins. Earlier testosterone therapy did not change the results. Studies of men with pre-pubertal onset had a lower success rate than mixed groups (68% vs 84%) [2].
Population
Men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and azoospermia, 44 gonadotropin studies [2].
Sources
[2]
Caveats
The pooled studies combine hCG with FSH preparations, so hCG alone is not isolated. The abstract does not say how many were controlled.
Heat therapyModerateStudied in women

Period pain, compared with an unheated patch

Shown to ease period pain in women more than an unheated placebo patch, in two trials. Mean pain relief over 2 days was 3.27 with heat against 1.95 without.

Compared with an unheated patch with a placebo pill (sham) [4][5]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Over 2 days, mean pain relief scores were 3.27 with a heated patch and placebo pill, 3.07 with an unheated patch and ibuprofen, 3.55 with both, and 1.95 with an unheated patch and placebo pill (all P ≤ .001 against the sham) [5]. A review found two trials favoring heat over unheated placebo therapy [4].
Population
84 women, 81 completing, in a double-dummy trial [5]. 6 trials [4].
Sources
[5], [4]
Caveats
A heated and an unheated patch feel different, so the blinding may be imperfect. The trials are small.
HemoglobinModerate

Birth outcomes by hemoglobin in pregnancy

Linked to more low birth weight, preterm birth and stillbirth at low maternal hemoglobin, and to more stillbirth at high levels, in pooled studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a meta-analysis of 95 studies, low maternal hemoglobin had pooled odds ratios of 1.42 (95% CI 1.31 to 1.55) for low birth weight, 1.36 (1.26 to 1.46) for preterm birth and 1.49 (1.15 to 1.92) for stillbirth. Odds rose as the cutoff fell: for low birth weight, 1.42 at 11.0 g/dL or below and 2.97 (1.85 to 4.75) at 7.0 g/dL or below. High maternal hemoglobin had odds ratios of 1.88 (1.21 to 2.91) for stillbirth and 1.22 (1.08 to 1.37) for a baby small for gestational age, and was not significantly associated with low birth weight or preterm birth [15].
Population
95 studies in the meta-analysis, within a systematic review of 272 [15].
Sources
[15]
Caveats
Observational. Few studies separated anemia from iron deficiency from other anemia, and results varied with the trimester of measurement. The authors judge the data insufficient to say whether cutoffs need revising [15].
HOMA-IRModerateStudied in women

Polycystic ovary syndrome

Linked to higher HOMA-IR in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, 2.68 in non-obese and 4.38 in obese women with it, against 1.34 and 2.44 without it.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooled mean HOMA-IR was 4.38 (95% CI 3.84 to 4.92) in obese women with PCOS, 2.68 (2.16 to 3.20) in non-obese women with PCOS, 2.44 (2.06 to 2.82) in obese women without PCOS and 1.34 (1.06 to 1.63) in non-obese women without it. Every group differed from the others except non-obese women with PCOS and obese women without it [20]. In 28 insulin clamp studies, insulin sensitivity was 27% lower in women with PCOS than in controls (99% CI ±6%), independent of body mass index [21].
Population
3,037 women in observational studies, in four groups by PCOS and obesity [20]. 28 clamp studies of premenopausal women with PCOS and controls [21].
Sources
[20], [21]
Caveats
Observational. Non-obese women with PCOS and obese women without it had similar values, so body weight is tied to HOMA-IR about as strongly as the condition is [20]. The pooled means come from studies using different insulin assays (see Effect of the insulin assay and the blood sample).
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in womenVery common

Period pain

Shown to reduce period pain in women more than placebo, with improvement in 37% to 60% against 28%, along with more irregular bleeding, headache and nausea.

Compared with placebo or no treatment [5]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Combined pills reduced pain more than placebo (SMD -0.58, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.41, high quality) and raised the chance of improvement (RR 1.65), from 28% to between 37% and 60%. Extra medication and missed work fell (RR 0.63 each). Continuous pill use may reduce pain more than the standard regimen [5].
Population
3,723 women in 21 trials [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
The dichotomous pain result was low quality [5].
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in women

Heavy periods (hormonal IUD)

Shown to lower heavy menstrual blood loss more than other medicines, about 67 mL more, with fewer treatment failures, on the levonorgestrel IUD in women with heavy periods.

Compared with oral progestins, combined pills, mefenamic acid, tranexamic acid or usual medical treatment [6]; medroxyprogesterone acetate [3]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against other medical therapy, the levonorgestrel IUD lowered menstrual blood loss (MD 66.91 mL, 95% CI 42.61 to 91.20, low certainty), led to fewer treatment failures (RR 0.34) and fewer withdrawals (RR 0.49), and slightly raised quality of life [6]. In the label trial, Mirena reduced blood loss more than medroxyprogesterone acetate over 6 cycles [3].
Population
2,511 women in 25 trials [6]; 160 women with blood loss of 80 mL or more [3].
Sources
[6], [3]
Caveats
Attrition bias and small numbers in several trials [6].
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in women

Heavy periods (combined pill)

Shown to return heavy periods to normal in 12% to 77% of women on the combined pill, against 3% on placebo. The hormonal IUD lowered blood loss more.

Compared with placebo, NSAIDs, the levonorgestrel IUD, the vaginal ring and long-course progestogens [25]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo, a combined pill with a step-down estrogen and step-up progestin regimen raised the odds of periods returning to normal (OR 22.12, 95% CI 4.40 to 111.12, 2 trials, 363 participants) and of lower blood loss (OR 5.15, 95% CI 3.16 to 8.40, 2 trials, 339 participants), at moderate quality. Where 3% improved on placebo, 12% to 77% would improve on the pill. Breast pain and other minor adverse events were more common on the pill. The levonorgestrel IUD lowered blood loss more than the pill (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.48, 2 trials, 151 participants, low quality). The pill and the vaginal ring did not clearly differ, and evidence against NSAIDs was insufficient [25].
Population
805 women with heavy periods and regular cycles in 8 trials [25].
Sources
[25]
Caveats
Apart from the two placebo trials, the evidence was low to very low quality, mainly from lack of blinding and imprecision. The review covered heavy bleeding with no other gynecological or systemic disease behind it, so it does not test bleeding from fibroids [25].
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in women

Ovarian cancer

Linked to lower ovarian cancer risk in women, 15% to 29% lower for every 5 years of pill use, with protection lasting over 30 years after stopping.

Compared with women who never used the pill [8]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Risk fell more with longer use, by 29% per 5 years of use that had stopped under 10 years before, 19% for 10 to 19 years and 15% for 20 to 29 years. Ten years of use was estimated to lower ovarian cancer before age 75 from 1.2 to 0.8 per 100 users [8].
Population
23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls in 45 studies [8].
Sources
[8]
Caveats
Observational. Most use was of older, higher-dose pills, though the reduction was similar across decades [8].
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in women

Endometrial cancer

Linked to lower endometrial cancer risk in women, about 24% lower for every 5 years of pill use, lasting over 30 years after stopping.

Compared with women who never used the pill [9]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Each 5 years of use carried a risk ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.78). Ten years of use was estimated to lower endometrial cancer before age 75 from 2.3 to 1.3 per 100 women in high-income countries [9].
Population
27,276 women with endometrial cancer and 115,743 controls in 36 studies [9].
Sources
[9]
Caveats
Observational, with the strongest effect for carcinomas [9].
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in women

Fertility after stopping

Shown that 83% of women became pregnant within 12 months of stopping contraception, with no difference between hormonal methods and IUDs or by length of pill use.

Compared with other contraceptive methods, including IUDs [10]

The numbers and sources
Effect
The pooled pregnancy rate within 12 months of stopping was 83.1% (95% CI 78.2 to 88). It did not differ significantly between hormonal methods and IUDs, and neither progestin type nor length of pill use changed it [10]. Pregnancies occurred as early as 7 to 14 days after implant removal [11].
Population
14,884 women in 22 studies [10]; implant trial participants [11].
Sources
[10], [11]
Caveats
Studies varied, and the review included the contraceptive injection, which is not covered on this page.
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in women

Endometriosis pain (combined pill)

Shown to ease endometriosis period pain more than placebo in two small trials, in very low-quality evidence. Pain at 6 months matched goserelin in one trial.

Compared with placebo [32][33]; goserelin [32]; oral progestins and GnRH agonists [33]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo, combined pills lowered period pain on a visual analogue scale (MD -23.68 points, 95% CI -28.75 to -18.62, 2 RCTs, 327 women) and on a 0 to 3 verbal scale (MD -1.30, 95% CI -1.84 to -0.76, 1 RCT, 96 women). At 6 months, pain did not differ from goserelin (MD -0.10 on a 1 to 10 scale, 95% CI -1.28 to 1.08, 50 women) [32]. A review of 9 RCTs and 9 observational studies found combined hormonal contraceptives lowered period pain, pelvic pain and pain with sex from baseline in most studies, about as much as or less than oral progestins and GnRH agonists [33].
Population
612 women with surgically confirmed endometriosis in 5 trials, 404 analyzed [32]; women with endometriosis in 18 studies [33].
Sources
[32], [33]
Caveats
Both placebo trials were at high risk of bias, with substantial involvement of the drug company that funded them [32]. Only 2 of the 9 trials in [33] were placebo-controlled, and most were not blinded.
InositolModerateStudied in women

Menstrual cycles and ovulation in PCOS

Shown to make a regular cycle about 1.8 times as likely as placebo in women with PCOS. The guideline review called the evidence limited.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A regular cycle was 1.79 times as likely on inositol as on placebo (95% CI 1.13 to 2.85), and results did not differ from metformin [1]. In an earlier analysis, ovulation rate (RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.7) and cycle frequency (RR 6.8, 95% CI 2.8 to 16.6) were higher than placebo [2]. A review for the 2023 international PCOS guideline found possible ovulation benefits for D-chiro-inositol and called the overall evidence limited and inconclusive [3].
Population
1,691 women in 26 trials [1]; 601 women in 10 trials [2]; 2,230 women in 30 trials [3].
Sources
[1], [2], [3]
Caveats
Sources disagree on certainty. Pregnancy rates came from single trials, and no trial reported live births or miscarriage [2]. Ovulation heterogeneity was high (I² 75%) [2].
InositolModerateStudied in women

Hormones and blood sugar in PCOS

Shown to lower free and total testosterone and glucose and raise SHBG in women with PCOS. Metformin did better on hirsutism.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo, inositol lowered BMI (MD -0.45), free testosterone (MD -0.41), total testosterone (MD -20.4) and glucose (MD -3.14), and raised sex-hormone-binding globulin (MD 32.1) [1]. The guideline review found benefits for some metabolic measures and none for others. Metformin did better on waist-hip ratio and hirsutism [3].
Population
1,691 women in 26 trials [1]; 2,230 women in 30 trials [3].
Sources
[1], [3]
Caveats
Units are as reported in the abstract. The guideline review rated BMI evidence very uncertain [3].
IronModerateStudied in pregnancy

Anemia in pregnancy

Shown to halve anemia risk in non-anemic pregnant women, with no change in birth weight or preterm birth.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 23 studies of 4,492 non-anemic pregnant women, oral iron raised hemoglobin by 6.95 g/L (95% CI 4.81 to 9.09) and ferritin by 12.22 ng/mL, and halved the risk of anemia (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.74, high certainty, number needed to treat 10). Birth weight, preterm birth and cesarean section did not differ [7].
Population
Non-anemic pregnant women in RCTs and observational studies [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was high for hemoglobin (I² 91%) and ferritin (I² 87%). Reporting of harms was inconsistent, and the authors found too little evidence to judge them [7].
Keto dietModerateStudied in women

Reproductive hormones and cycles in PCOS

Shown in pooled studies, mostly before and after the diet, to lower LH and testosterone and raise SHBG in women with PCOS. Against other diets, androgen results were inconsistent.

Compared with before the diet, in the same women [25][23][21][22]; other diets [21]; low-calorie diets [22]

The numbers and sources
Effect
After 45 days or more on a ketogenic diet, the LH to FSH ratio fell (d -0.851, 95% CI -1.015 to -0.686), free testosterone fell (d -0.223, 95% CI -0.328 to -0.119) and SHBG rose (d 9.086, 95% CI 3.379 to 14.792) [25]. A second review found lower LH, LH to FSH ratio, free and total testosterone and higher SHBG and FSH after the diet [23]. Menstrual cycle length shortened and LH fell from before to after the diet, while androgen results against other diets were inconsistent [21]. In 2 RCTs, LH was lower than on low-calorie diets [22].
Population
Women with PCOS in single- or double-arm clinical trials [25]; 7 studies [23]; 15 studies, 10 pooled [21]; 10 studies including 3 RCTs [22].
Sources
[25], [23], [21], [22]
Caveats
Diets lasted weeks to months, and all reviews were limited by small, mostly uncontrolled studies. Pregnancy and live birth data were too scarce to pool [23].
L-arginineModerateStudied in men

Erectile function

Shown to raise the odds of improvement about 3 times over placebo in men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction, at 1,500 to 5,000 mg a day.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 10 RCTs with 540 men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction, 1,500 to 5,000 mg of arginine raised the odds of improvement over placebo or no treatment (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.29 to 8.77, I² 44%). IIEF erectile function, orgasmic function and satisfaction scores improved, and sexual desire did not change [7].
Population
Men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
Doses and durations varied. The analysis included arginine combined with other substances alongside arginine alone [7].
Letrozole and clomipheneModerateStudied in men

Testosterone in men: clomiphene

Shown to raise total testosterone in men with low testosterone, by about 274 ng/dL against placebo, in pooled trials of clomiphene or enclomiphene.

Compared with placebo [13]; testosterone gel [13]; human chorionic gonadotropin [13]; the same men before treatment [14]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo, clomiphene or enclomiphene raised total testosterone by 273.76 ng/dL (95% CI 191.87 to 355.66, I² 89%), LH by 4.66 IU/L and FSH by 4.59 IU/L. Total testosterone did not differ from testosterone gel. Levels were higher than with hCG alone [13]. Across 17 studies pooled in a second review, total testosterone rose during treatment (pooled estimate 2.60, 95% CI 1.82 to 3.38, unit not given in the abstract), along with free testosterone, LH, FSH, SHBG and estradiol. Symptom scores on the Androgen Deficiency in Aging Males questionnaire improved. Side effects were reported by fewer than 10% of study populations and no serious adverse events were reported [14].
Population
Men with functional hypogonadism in randomized trials [13]. 1,642 men with hypogonadism in 19 studies, 4 randomized and 15 observational, treated for 1.5 to 52 months [14].
Sources
[13], [14]
Caveats
The first review pooled clomiphene with enclomiphene and heterogeneity was high [13]. The second rests mostly on before-and-after observational studies [14]. Use in men is off-label in the US [1]. Neither abstract reports fractures, heart events or fertility.
Low-carb dietModerateStudied in women

Weight and insulin resistance in PCOS

Shown in one meta-analysis of 8 trials to lower BMI and insulin resistance more than a regular diet in women with PCOS.

Compared with a regular diet with about 45% of energy from carbohydrate [13]; before the diet, in the same women [14]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against a regular diet, low-carbohydrate diets lowered BMI (SMD -1.04, 95% CI -1.38 to -0.70), HOMA-IR (SMD -0.66, 95% CI -1.01 to -0.30), total cholesterol (SMD -0.68) and LDL cholesterol (SMD -0.66, 95% CI -1.30 to -0.02) [13]. A second review of 25 diet studies in PCOS found insulin resistance fell from before to after diets with under 50% of energy from carbohydrate (standardized paired difference -0.86, 95% CI -1.23 to -0.50) [14].
Population
327 women with PCOS in 8 RCTs [13]; women with PCOS in 25 prospective diet studies [14].
Sources
[13], [14]
Caveats
Trials were small. The second review measured change within each diet group rather than against another diet [14].
Low-carb dietModerateStudied in women

Testosterone and SHBG in PCOS

In one meta-analysis, testosterone fell and SHBG rose more than on a regular diet only in trials of women with PCOS lasting longer than 4 weeks.

Compared with a regular diet with about 45% of energy from carbohydrate [13]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In trials of low-carbohydrate diets lasting more than 4 weeks, testosterone fell (SMD -1.79, 95% CI -3.22 to -0.36), SHBG rose (MD 5.98, 95% CI 3.51 to 8.46) and FSH rose (MD 0.39) more than on a regular diet. Diets low in both fat and carbohydrate raised SHBG and FSH more than higher-fat versions [13].
Population
327 women with PCOS in 8 RCTs [13].
Sources
[13]
Caveats
These are subgroup results by trial length, from small trials. The abstract does not report an overall pooled effect on testosterone or SHBG [13].
Menopausal hormone therapyModerateStudied in women

Hot flashes and night sweats

Shown to cut hot flash frequency about 75% relative to placebo in menopausal women, though placebo alone cut them about 58%.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Oral hormone therapy reduced weekly hot flash frequency by a weighted mean difference of -17.92 against placebo (95% CI -22.86 to -12.99), a 75% reduction relative to placebo (95% CI 64.3 to 82.3). Severity fell with an OR of 0.13 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.23). Women on placebo also had a 57.7% reduction from baseline [1].
Population
24 double-blind RCTs with 3,329 women, lasting 3 months to 3 years [1].
Sources
[1]
Caveats
The large placebo response means unblinded comparisons overstate the effect. The search ran to 2002, and the trials used fixed oral doses [1].
Menopausal hormone therapyModerateStudied in women

Menopause symptom scores and quality of life

Shown to lower menopause symptom scores and improve menopause quality of life against controls, with larger effects from estradiol-containing therapy.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against controls, hormone therapy lowered the Kupperman menopause index more, by an SMD of -1.21 (95% CI -1.43 to -0.98) in estradiol-containing subgroups and -0.39 (95% CI -0.67 to -0.10) in others. The menopause-specific quality of life score improved by an SMD of -0.43 (95% CI -0.60 to -0.27). Vaginal pH fell (SMD -0.97, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.87) [2].
Population
5,089 women in 24 RCTs, 3,062 on hormone therapy [2].
Sources
[2]
Caveats
Controls were not all placebo, and one subgroup used acupuncture as the comparison. Treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.13) [2].
MetforminModerateStudied in women

Menstrual cycles in PCOS

Shown to make periods more frequent in women with PCOS, against placebo and when added to lifestyle change, on low-quality evidence.

Compared with placebo or no treatment [32]; lifestyle change with or without placebo [33]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo or no treatment, metformin raised menstrual frequency (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.61, 7 studies, 427 women, low-quality evidence) [32]. Lifestyle change plus metformin gave about one more menstrual cycle over 6 months than lifestyle change with or without placebo (MD 1.06, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.82) [33].
Population
48 RCTs with 4,451 women with PCOS and infrequent or absent ovulation, 42 of them on metformin [32]; 12 RCTs with 608 women with PCOS [33].
Sources
[32], [33]
Caveats
Each comparison rests on one review. Heterogeneity was moderate (I² 54%) [32]. Trials were small and short, with risk of bias [33].
N-acetylcysteineModerateStudied in women

Polycystic ovary syndrome

Shown to raise progesterone and endometrial thickness in women with PCOS. These are hormone and ultrasound measures, not pregnancy rates.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 22 studies (2,515 women), NAC was associated with higher progesterone (SMD 0.95, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.77) and thicker endometrium (SMD 0.58, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.06) than placebo and other drugs. Estradiol, SHBG and FSH did not differ [7].
Population
Women with PCOS, compared with placebo, metformin or clomiphene [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
Hormone and ultrasound measures, not pregnancy or live birth rates. Comparators were mixed.
N-acetylcysteineModerateStudied in men

Male fertility and semen quality

Shown to improve sperm concentration, motility, morphology and semen volume in men with infertility, measured as semen quality rather than pregnancy.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 5 RCTs in men with infertility or impaired semen, NAC raised semen volume (MD 0.69 mL), sperm concentration (MD 4.43), total motility (MD 9.69) and normal morphology (MD 1.36) against control [8]. In 3 placebo-controlled trials in idiopathic male infertility, NAC improved sperm concentration, morphology, motility and ejaculation volume [9].
Population
Men with infertility or impaired semen parameters [8][9].
Sources
[8], [9]
Caveats
Few trials, likely overlapping between the reviews. Semen measures, not pregnancy or live birth. The abstract of [9] reports p-values only.
NSAIDsModerateStudied in women

Heavy menstrual bleeding

Shown to lower menstrual blood loss more than placebo in women with heavy periods. Tranexamic acid, danazol and the hormonal IUD lowered it more.

Compared with placebo, tranexamic acid, danazol, the levonorgestrel IUD, oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, the combined pill, an older progesterone IUD and other NSAIDs [23]

The numbers and sources
Effect
As a group, NSAIDs reduced heavy menstrual bleeding more than placebo and less than tranexamic acid, danazol or the levonorgestrel IUD. In one trial of 11 women, blood loss was 124 mL a cycle lower on mefenamic acid than on placebo (MD -124 mL, 95% CI -186 to -62). In a crossover trial, median loss was 146 mL a cycle on placebo, 123 mL on ibuprofen 600 mg and 110 mL on ibuprofen 1,200 mg. Against tranexamic acid, loss was 73 mL a cycle higher on mefenamic acid (95% CI 22 to 124, 48 women). Naproxen and mefenamic acid did not differ, and no clear difference was found against oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, the combined pill or an older progesterone IUD [23].
Population
759 women with regular heavy periods not caused by a disease or treatment, in 19 randomized trials, 9 of them pooled [23].
Sources
[23]
Caveats
The reviewers rated the evidence low to moderate quality, and most trials were small and underpowered. Women whose bleeding had a disease or treatment cause, such as fibroids, were not included, so these trials do not test bleeding from fibroids [23].
Physical activityModerateStudied in women

PMS symptoms in trials

Shown in one review of trials to lower overall PMS symptoms more than no exercise, along with psychological, physical and behavioral symptoms, in trials mostly at high risk of bias.

Compared with non-exercise comparator groups [25]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 7 pooled trials (265 women), exercise of at least 8 weeks lowered global PMS symptom scores (SMD -1.08, 95% CI -1.88 to -0.29, I² 87%). Psychological (SMD -1.67), physical (SMD -1.62) and behavioral (SMD -1.94) symptoms also fell [25].
Population
717 women with PMS in 15 RCTs [25].
Sources
[25]
Caveats
87% of trials were at high risk of bias, and heterogeneity was substantial [25].
Physical activityModerateStudied in women

Insulin resistance and weight in PCOS, in trials

Shown in trials to lower fasting insulin and insulin resistance slightly in women with PCOS. Fasting glucose did not change, at very low to low quality.

Compared with usual care or control groups [27]; before exercise, including trials with no control group [28]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against control, exercise lowered fasting insulin (MD -2.44 µIU/mL, 95% CI -4.24 to -0.64) and HOMA-IR (MD -0.57, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.14), both very low quality, and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides. Waist fell 2.62 cm and BMI 1.02 kg/m2 after the programs. Fasting glucose and blood pressure did not change. Exercise added to diet did not differ from diet alone [27]. Vigorous exercise was linked to a 36.2% fall in HOMA-IR, a 4.2% fall in waist circumference and a 24.2% rise in VO2peak [28].
Population
18 trials in women with PCOS [27]; 777 women in 19 studies, including uncontrolled trials, of 6 to 26 weeks [28].
Sources
[27], [28]
Caveats
Many effects were modest with wide intervals and shifted when single trials were added or removed [27]. [28] pooled controlled and uncontrolled studies.
ProgesteroneModerate

Early pregnancy that does not continue, in women with pain or bleeding

Linked to non-viable pregnancy at low levels: with pain or bleeding and an inconclusive scan, progesterone under 3.2 to 6 ng/mL predicted it with 98.4% specificity.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In women with symptoms and an inconclusive ultrasound, a single progesterone below cut-offs of 3.2 to 6 ng/mL predicted a non-viable pregnancy with a pooled sensitivity of 74.6% (95% CI 50.6% to 89.4%) and specificity of 98.4% (90.9% to 99.7%). A low result raised the probability of a non-viable pregnancy from a median of 73.2% to 99.2%. In women with symptoms alone, a threshold of 10 ng/mL gave a sensitivity of 66.5% (53.6% to 77.4%) and a specificity of 96.3% (91.1% to 98.5%), raising the probability from 62.9% to 96.8% [7].
Population
26 cohort studies with 9,436 women in the first 14 weeks of a spontaneous pregnancy, all with pain or bleeding [7].
Sources
[7], [2]
Caveats
Observational studies of test accuracy in women who already had symptoms, most of whose pregnancies were non-viable, so the figures do not describe pregnancy in general. A low level may mark a failing pregnancy and not cause it. MedlinePlus describes this use of the test as largely superseded by other tests [2].
ProgesteroneModerateStudied in women

Pregnancy in IVF cycles

Linked to fewer pregnancies in IVF at both ends: raised progesterone before egg collection in fresh cycles, and luteal levels under 10 ng/mL in frozen transfers.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In fresh IVF cycles, progesterone at or above 0.8 ng/mL on the day of the trigger injection went with a lower probability of pregnancy: odds ratios of 0.79 at 0.8 to 1.1 ng/mL, 0.67 at 1.2 to 1.4, 0.64 at 1.5 to 1.75 and 0.68 at 1.9 to 3.0. No such effect was seen in frozen-thawed or donor cycles [9]. Around frozen embryo transfer, among studies that used thresholds under 10 ng/mL, a level above the threshold went with more ongoing pregnancies or live births (relative risk 1.47, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.70) and fewer miscarriages (0.62, 0.50 to 0.77) in cycles using only vaginal progesterone and blastocysts [10].
Population
63 studies of 55,199 fresh cycles, 9 studies of 7,229 frozen-thawed cycles and 8 studies of 1,330 donor cycles [9]. Cohort studies of women having frozen embryo transfer, searched to March 2021 [10].
Sources
[9], [10]
Caveats
Observational. These findings are for women in IVF treatment, most of them given hormones, and do not carry over to natural cycles. The second review found it uncertain whether thresholds of 10 ng/mL or above mattered, and calls for trials of whether raising a low level changes outcomes [10]. Assays disagree most at the low levels the first finding rests on (see Accuracy).
Progestins for endometriosis and heavy bleedingModerateStudied in women

Endometriosis pain, compared with GnRH agonist injections

Shown to ease endometriosis pain in women about as much as GnRH agonist injections such as leuprolide, with less bone loss and fewer hot flushes.

Compared with GnRH agonists [5]; leuprolide injections [9][10][11][1]; a GnRH antagonist [5]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Oral progestins and GnRH agonists did not differ for overall pain (MD -0.01, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.28, low certainty), and side effects overall were more frequent with oral progestins (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.86). Depot progestins reduced period pain slightly more than GnRH agonists (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.97, high certainty) with fewer side effects overall (RR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11). Against a GnRH antagonist, more women stopped a depot progestin for side effects (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.94) [5]. Over 24 weeks, pain fell 47.5 mm with dienogest and 46.0 mm with leuprolide, and spine bone density changed +0.25% against -4.04% [9]. The medroxyprogesterone injection matched leuprolide on four of five pain signs at 6 months and all five at 18 months, with less bone loss [10][11]. Moderate or severe hot flushes at month 6 were reported by 27% on the injection and 69% on leuprolide [1].
Population
10 trials of oral progestins and 2 of depot progestins against GnRH agonists [5]. 252 women [9]. 274 women in Canada and the US [10]. 300 women [11]. Women in the injection's two endometriosis trials [1].
Sources
[5], [9], [10], [11], [1]
Caveats
These are equivalence comparisons between two active drugs, not against placebo. The dienogest trial was open-label [9], and the injection trials blinded only the evaluator [10][11].
ProlactinModerate

Periods and ovulation in trials that lowered high prolactin

Shown in a trial of women with high prolactin and no periods: the drug that normalized prolactin more often also restored ovulation more often, 72% against 52%.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In women with high prolactin and absent periods, prolactin became stably normal in 83% on cabergoline and 59% on bromocriptine, and 72% against 52% had ovulatory cycles or became pregnant. Absent periods persisted in 7% and 16%. Adverse effects were recorded in 68% and 78% [4]. A systematic review found that dopamine agonists, against no treatment, reduced the prolactin level and the likelihood of persistently high prolactin (relative risk 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99), and that cabergoline did more than bromocriptine to reduce persistently high prolactin, absent or infrequent periods and milky discharge [5].
Population
459 women, most with a small prolactin-secreting pituitary tumor or no cause found, treated for 24 weeks [4]. 8 randomized and 178 nonrandomized studies with more than 3,000 patients [5].
Sources
[4], [5]
Caveats
The trial compared two drugs and had no placebo group. It enrolled women with high prolactin and absent periods, so it does not describe mildly raised results found without symptoms [4].
ProlactinModerateStudied in women

Breast cancer

Linked to slightly more breast cancer at higher levels within the usual range, 16% more for the highest against the lowest levels in seven pooled studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a meta-analysis of seven studies, the highest against the lowest prolactin levels had a pooled relative risk of breast cancer of 1.16 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.29). The association appeared in postmenopausal women and for hormone receptor positive tumors, and not in premenopausal women [6]. In two cohorts of US nurses, prolactin above 15.7 ng/mL against 8.1 ng/mL or below, measured less than 10 years before diagnosis, had a relative risk of 1.20 (1.03 to 1.40). Levels measured 10 or more years before diagnosis showed no association (0.97). In postmenopausal women the relative risk was 1.37 [7].
Population
7 observational studies [6]. 2,468 women with breast cancer and 4,021 controls with a sample from less than 10 years before diagnosis [7].
Sources
[6], [7]
Caveats
Observational. The cut points are quarters of the study's own participants and sit inside the ranges printed above [7].
ProlactinModerateStudied in women

Polycystic ovary syndrome

Linked to slightly higher prolactin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, about 1 ng/mL more than in women without it, in a meta-analysis of 32 studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooled across 32 studies, prolactin was higher in women with PCOS than in controls (weighted mean difference 1.01 ng/mL, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.98). A meta-regression for age, body mass index and region did not change the result. By region, the difference was significant only in studies from Eurasia, and not in those from Asia, Europe or South America [17].
Population
8,551 women with PCOS by the Rotterdam criteria and 13,737 controls [17].
Sources
[17]
Caveats
Observational. A difference of about 1 ng/mL is small against the ranges above, and the lower confidence limit is close to zero. Results from different assays and units were converted to ng/mL [17].
Red cell folateModerate

Neural tube defects in pregnancy

Linked to fewer neural tube defects at higher levels in early pregnancy, an estimated 25 per 10,000 births at about 221 ng/mL and 6 at about 521.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a case-control study, a woman's risk of having a child with a neural tube defect was associated with early pregnancy red cell folate in a continuous dose-response relationship [7]. A model built on two Chinese studies of folic acid 400 µg a day estimated 25.4 defects per 10,000 births (95% uncertainty interval 20.8 to 31.2) at a red cell folate of 500 nmol/L (about 221 ng/mL) and 6 per 10,000 at 1,180 nmol/L (about 521 ng/mL). Risk was substantially attenuated above about 1,000 nmol/L (about 442 ng/mL) [8]. WHO sets above 400 ng/mL as the population threshold for women of reproductive age [2].
Population
Women in a case-control study of early pregnancy blood samples [7]. 247,831 participants in a Chinese community intervention and 1,194 in a randomized trial of folic acid [8].
Sources
[7], [8], [2], [5]
Caveats
The model combines an intervention project with a separate trial that measured blood folate, so the link between a red cell level and risk is estimated, not observed in the same women [8]. WHO states that its threshold is for populations and is not to be used to predict an individual's risk, since low folate is not responsible for all neural tube defects [2]. The cut points depend on the assay [5]. The ng/mL figures are converted here from nmol/L.
ReflexologyModerateStudied in pregnancy

Pain and anxiety in labor

Shown to lower labor pain by about 1.9 points on a 0 to 10 scale and reduce anxiety, against placebo, usual care or no intervention.

Compared with placebo, usual care or no intervention [13]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Foot reflexology lowered pain (mean difference -1.89 on a 0 to 10 scale, 95% CI -2.34 to -1.45) and anxiety (SMD -0.88, 95% CI -1.41 to -0.34), shortened the stages of labor and raised birth satisfaction. It lowered pulse and breathing rate and did not change blood pressure. The reviewers rated the evidence moderate for pain [13].
Population
1,189 pregnant women in 13 trials [13].
Sources
[13]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was very high (I² 92% for pain). Some trials had high risk of bias in how women were assigned to groups [13].
Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG)Moderate

Age, body weight and thyroid status

Linked in cohort and genetic studies to age, body weight and thyroid status: higher with age in men and with an overactive thyroid, lower at a higher body mass index.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In pooled individual data from 21,074 men, SHBG was directly associated with age and inversely associated with body mass index [13]. In a population-based cohort, SHBG rose in a straight line with age in men and followed a U-shaped pattern with age in women, and people with more cardiovascular risk factors had lower levels. Total testosterone and triglycerides explained 46.2% of the variation in men. Total testosterone, triglycerides, body mass index and fasting insulin explained 31.8% in women [14]. Among women with thyroid disorders, mean SHBG differed between groups because of the group with an overactive thyroid, where thyroid hormone levels were the main correlates. In the other groups the main correlates were body mass index and age [15]. In a genetic analysis, each standard deviation of genetically higher thyroid stimulating hormone went with SHBG 1.332 nmol/L lower (95% CI 0.717 to 1.946). Genetic predisposition to an underactive thyroid went with lower SHBG and to an overactive thyroid with higher SHBG [16].
Population
9 cohorts of community-dwelling men with individual data [13]. 3,264 men and women in a population-based cohort [14]. Women with overt or subclinical thyroid disorders [15]. Up to 194,174 women and 167,020 men in UK Biobank [16].
Sources
[13], [14], [15], [16]
Caveats
These are associations seen across people. The cohort analyses are cross-sectional and do not show that a change in weight alters a person's SHBG. The genetic analysis found no association between thyroid function and sexual function [16].
Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG)Moderate

Polycystic ovary syndrome

Linked to lower SHBG in women with polycystic ovary syndrome than in women without it, in a meta-analysis of 62 studies and in a genetic study.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a meta-analysis, SHBG was lower in women with PCOS than in controls (standardized mean difference -0.83, 95% CI -1.01 to -0.64), with very high heterogeneity (I² 93.9%) [20]. In a Mendelian randomization study using 289 gene variants tied to SHBG, genetically higher SHBG went with lower odds of PCOS (odds ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.78) [21]. In a meta-analysis of insulin clamp studies, lower SHBG went with lower insulin sensitivity in women with PCOS (-10%, 99% CI ±10%), an association not explained by body mass index [22].
Population
62 studies [20]. Published genome-wide data on SHBG and on PCOS [21]. 28 clamp studies of premenopausal women with PCOS and controls [22].
Sources
[20], [21], [22]
Caveats
Observational, apart from the genetic study. The meta-analysis abstract does not say whether body mass index was matched or adjusted for [20], and SHBG is lower at a higher body mass index (see the block on age, body weight and thyroid status). Genetic estimates describe lifelong differences, not the effect of changing the level later in life [21].
SNRIsModerateStudied in women

Menopausal hot flashes

Shown to reduce moderate and severe hot flashes in postmenopausal women on desvenlafaxine 100 mg, an unapproved use. Venlafaxine lowered hot flash scores in women with breast cancer.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In six placebo-controlled trials, desvenlafaxine 100 mg lowered the frequency of moderate and severe hot flashes at week 12 (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.07), as did 150 mg (SMD -0.36, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.19) [19]. In women treated for breast cancer, venlafaxine at 75 mg a day or more lowered hot flash scores against non-hormonal comparators (SMD 2.06, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.72) [20].
Population
Postmenopausal women with moderate to severe hot flashes in 6 RCTs [19]; women treated for breast cancer in randomized trials of venlafaxine [20].
Sources
[19], [20]
Caveats
No SNRI label cited here lists hot flashes. The venlafaxine analysis had very high heterogeneity (I² 98.7%) and signs of publication bias, and its comparators were other non-hormonal treatments [20].
Soy foodsModerateStudied in women

Breast cancer

Linked to 41% lower odds of breast cancer with higher soy isoflavone intake in studies of Asian women, with no clear link in Western women.

Compared with the lowest isoflavone intake [9]; 10 mg a day less isoflavones, in a dose-response model [10]; the lowest quartile, 4.5 mg a day [10]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In Asian studies, higher soy isoflavone intake was linked to lower breast cancer in premenopausal (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.69) and postmenopausal women (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.74). In Western postmenopausal women the link was marginal (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.00) and not significant by study design [9]. In 300,000 Chinese women, the top quartile (19.1 mg a day) against the bottom (4.5 mg) was not linked to breast cancer (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.22), and a meta-analysis of prospective studies found 3% lower risk per extra 10 mg a day (95% CI 1% to 5%) [10].
Population
35 studies of pre- and postmenopausal women [9]. Over 300,000 women aged 30 to 79 with 2,289 cases over 10 years, plus prospective cohorts [10].
Sources
[9], [10]
Caveats
Observational, and many studies in one review were case-control [9]. Intake in Western populations is much lower than in Asian ones.
Soy foodsModerateStudied in women

Breast cancer recurrence and survival

Linked to 25% lower breast cancer recurrence at 10 mg or more of soy isoflavones a day after diagnosis, in pooled cohorts of US and Chinese women.

Compared with women eating under 10 mg of isoflavones a day [11]; the lowest soy and isoflavone intake [12]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In pooled US and Chinese cohorts, 10 mg or more of isoflavones a day after diagnosis was linked to lower recurrence (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92), and to death from breast cancer (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.07) and from any cause (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.10) without reaching significance [11]. A meta-analysis linked intake before diagnosis to better overall survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.98), found no significant link for intake after diagnosis, and linked both to lower recurrence [12].
Population
9,514 breast cancer survivors followed a mean 7.4 years [11]. 37,275 women with breast cancer in 12 articles [12].
Sources
[11], [12]
Caveats
Observational. Survivors who eat soy may differ in other habits and treatments.
SSRIsModerateStudied in women

Premenstrual syndrome and PMDD

Shown to reduce premenstrual symptoms in women with PMS or PMDD by a moderate amount, more with daily dosing than with dosing in the luteal phase only.

The numbers and sources
Effect
SSRIs lowered overall self-rated premenstrual symptoms against placebo (SMD -0.57, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.42). The effect was larger with continuous dosing (SMD -0.69) than with luteal phase dosing (SMD -0.39). Nausea (OR 3.30), insomnia (OR 1.99) and sexual dysfunction or decreased libido (OR 2.32) were more frequent than on placebo [16]. The 2013 version of the same review reported numbers needed to harm of 7 for nausea and 14 for decreased libido at moderate doses [17].
Population
1,742 women in 12 studies for the symptom outcome, within 34 RCTs of fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, escitalopram and citalopram [16]; 31 RCTs [17].
Sources
[16], [17]
Caveats
Both sources are versions of one Cochrane review. 68% of the included studies were funded by drug companies, and the authors suspected publication bias in the response analysis [16].
SSRIsModerateStudied in menVery common

Premature ejaculation

Shown to improve self-rated premature ejaculation in men, about 202 more per 1,000 than placebo, in a use no label cited here lists.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Men on an SSRI were more likely to rate their symptoms better or much better than men on placebo (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.23), 202 more per 1,000 against 220 per 1,000 on placebo. Satisfaction with intercourse rose (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.87). Time to ejaculation was 3.09 minutes longer (95% CI 1.94 to 4.25). Stopping treatment for adverse events was more frequent (RR 3.80, 95% CI 2.61 to 5.51), 30 more per 1,000 against 11 per 1,000 on placebo [18].
Population
8,254 men with premature ejaculation in 31 randomized trials [18].
Sources
[18]
Caveats
Certainty was moderate for symptom ratings and low for time to ejaculation and for withdrawals. The abstract does not break results down by drug [18].
SSRIsModerateStudied in women

Menopausal hot flashes

Shown to reduce hot flash frequency and severity modestly in menopausal women. Paroxetine 7.5 mg is the one SSRI product approved for this use.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against placebo, SSRIs lowered hot flash frequency (difference in means -0.93, 95% CI -1.46 to -0.37) and severity (standardized difference -0.34, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.10) [19]. The label for paroxetine 7.5 mg reports two placebo-controlled trials in which the frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes fell more than on placebo at weeks 4 and 12 [20].
Population
2,069 menopausal and postmenopausal women in 11 RCTs followed 1 to 9 months [19]; 1,174 postmenopausal women with at least 7 to 8 moderate to severe hot flashes a day in two trials of 12 and 24 weeks [20].
Sources
[19], [20]
Caveats
The pooled analysis ranked escitalopram ahead of other SSRIs by indirect comparison [19]. In one of the two label trials, severity did not differ from placebo at week 12 [20].
St. John's WortModerate

Premenstrual symptoms

Shown to lower PMS anxiety, depression, mood and behavioral symptoms modestly against placebo. One small trial found physical and behavioral gains but no mood change.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 9 RCTs, St. John's wort lowered PMS anxiety (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.05), depression (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.17), mood disturbance (SMD -0.36, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.06) and behavioral symptoms (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.19) against placebo [4]. In a crossover trial of 36 women with mild PMS, 900 mg a day for two cycles improved physical and behavioral symptoms more than placebo. Mood and pain symptoms, anxiety, depression, hormones and cytokines did not differ [5].
Population
1,020 participants in 9 RCTs published from 2000 to 2023 [4]. 36 women aged 18 to 45 [5].
Sources
[4], [5]
Caveats
One meta-analysis, which searched Iranian regional databases alongside international ones. The authors note a lack of high-quality evidence for some outcomes [4]. The single crossover trial found no mood difference, unlike the pooled result [5].
TENSModerateStudied in women

Period pain, compared with sham or no treatment pooled together

Shown to ease period pain in women by 1.39 points with high-frequency and 2.04 with low-frequency TENS, against sham or no treatment pooled together, at low certainty.

Compared with placebo TENS or no treatment, pooled together [5]

The numbers and sources
Effect
High-frequency TENS lowered pain against placebo or no treatment (MD -1.39, 95% CI -2.51 to -0.28, 10 trials, 345 women, I² 88%), as did low-frequency TENS (MD -2.04, 95% CI -2.95 to -1.14, 3 trials, I² 0%). High- and low-frequency TENS did not clearly differ (MD 0.89, 95% CI -0.19 to 1.96) [5].
Population
585 women aged 12 to 49 with primary dysmenorrhea in 20 trials [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
The Cochrane review pools placebo and no-treatment arms, so blinded and unblinded comparisons are mixed. Certainty was downgraded for risk of bias [5].
Testosterone therapyModerateStudied in men

Sexual function in men with low testosterone

Shown to raise sexual desire, erectile function and satisfaction slightly in men with low testosterone, with effects small by usual standards.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Compared with placebo, testosterone raised sexual desire by an SMD of 0.17 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.34, 1,383 men), erectile function by 0.16 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.27, 1,344 men) and sexual satisfaction by 0.16 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.31, 676 men) [1].
Population
Adult men with morning testosterone of 300 ng/dL or less and at least one symptom, in 4 trials (1,779 men) lasting at least 12 weeks [1].
Sources
[1]
Caveats
Effect sizes under 0.2 are small by conventional thresholds. Four trials, all judged at low risk of bias.
Tongkat aliModerateStudied in men

Total testosterone

Shown to raise total testosterone in men, including men with low testosterone, in few small trials, one run partly by the maker.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 5 RCTs, tongkat ali raised total testosterone (SMD 1.352, 95% CI 0.565 to 2.138), with the effect confirmed in the hypogonadism subgroup [1]. In 105 men aged 50 to 70 with testosterone below 300 ng/dL, 200 mg a day raised total testosterone over placebo at weeks 4, 8 and 12, and free testosterone did not differ between groups [2].
Population
Healthy and hypogonadal men in 9 studies reviewed and 5 pooled [1]; ageing men in India for 12 weeks [2].
Sources
[1], [2]
Caveats
Few small trials. Two authors of [2], including the first author, were at Biotropics Malaysia Berhad, maker of the Physta extract it tested.
Tranexamic acidModerateStudied in women

Quality of life and daily limits from heavy periods

Shown to ease limits on social, leisure and physical activities during periods in women with heavy bleeding, compared with placebo.

Compared with placebo [2][4][5]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In two trials, quality of life scores improved more than on placebo (MD 0.5, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.7, I² 0%, moderate certainty) [2]. On a 1 to 5 scale of limits, social and leisure limits fell 0.98 and 0.85 points against 0.39 and 0.44 on placebo, and physical limits fell 0.94 and 0.87 against 0.34 and 0.40 [4]. Work inside and outside the home and self-perceived blood loss also improved against placebo [5].
Population
Women with heavy menstrual bleeding in 2 pooled trials [2]; 112 and 115 women on 3,900 mg a day against 66 and 72 on placebo [4]; 187 women in the 6-cycle trial [5].
Sources
[2], [4], [5]
Caveats
The label trials were the trials behind the drug's approval. Soiling beyond underwear (large stains) did not differ from placebo [4].
TribulusModerateStudied in men

Sperm quality

Shown to improve some sperm measures in infertile men in 6 of 7 studies, though results were not pooled and some studies had no control group.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A systematic review found 7 studies of tribulus in men with idiopathic infertility. Six reported improvement in some or all of sperm count, motility and morphology, and one uncontrolled study found no effect [10].
Population
Infertile men in clinical trials and quasi-experimental studies [10].
Sources
[10]
Caveats
The review did not pool results, and some included studies had no control arm [10].
TriptansModerateStudied in women

Preventing menstrual migraine

Shown to raise the share of women free of menstrual migraine when frovatriptan was taken around the period, with about 4 to 7 treated for one extra.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Taken for 5 to 6 days starting 2 to 3 days before the expected headache, frovatriptan 2.5 mg once a day raised the chance of a period free of menstrual migraine against placebo (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.72, number needed to treat 7.22), and twice a day more so (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.09, number needed to treat 3.90). Numbers needed to treat for zolmitriptan 2.5 mg were 4.98 twice a day and 2.52 three times a day [12].
Population
Women with menstrual migraine in 6 randomized trials: 1,217 given frovatriptan, 462 naratriptan, 163 zolmitriptan and 1,104 placebo [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
All participants were women, with mean ages of 36 to 38. No trial compared one triptan with another [12]. The sumatriptan label states it is not indicated for preventing migraine [11].
Ulipristal acetateModerateStudied in women

Heavy bleeding with fibroids, against leuprolide

Shown to control fibroid bleeding in 90% to 98% of women, as often as leuprolide injections at 89%, with moderate to severe hot flashes in 10% to 11% against 40%.

Compared with leuprolide injections [3][5][6]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Over 13 weeks, bleeding was controlled in 90% on 5 mg and 98% on 10 mg ulipristal and 89% on monthly leuprolide 3.75 mg, meeting the trial's noninferiority margin. Median time to amenorrhea was 7 and 5 days against 21 days. Moderate to severe hot flashes affected 11% and 10% against 40% [5]. Fibroid symptom severity and quality of life did not differ from leuprolide (MD -3.70 and 1.06 points, 1 RCT, 281 women) [3]. Before surgery, bleeding reduction did not differ between ulipristal 5 mg and GnRH agonists (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.68), and uterine volume fell 20% to 22% on ulipristal against 47% on GnRH agonists [6].
Population
307 women with fibroids and heavy bleeding [5]; 281 women in the quality of life comparison [3]; women in trials before fibroid surgery [6].
Sources
[5], [3], [6]
Caveats
One main head-to-head trial, funded by PregLem [5].
Ulipristal acetateModerateStudied in women

Fibroid size

Shown to shrink fibroids against placebo, a median 21% and 12% on 5 mg and 10 mg against a 3% rise, though less than GnRH agonists shrank the uterus.

Compared with placebo [1][3][6]; GnRH agonists [6]

The numbers and sources
Effect
At 13 weeks, median total fibroid volume changed -21% on 5 mg, -12% on 10 mg and +3% on placebo [1]. SPRMs reduced uterine and fibroid volume against placebo in heterogeneous trials too varied to pool [3][6]. Uterine volume fell 47% on GnRH agonists against 20% and 22% on ulipristal 5 mg and 10 mg [6].
Population
242 anemic women with fibroids [1]; RCTs of SPRMs [3]; women before fibroid surgery in 41 RCTs [6].
Sources
[1], [3], [6]
Caveats
The pooled results cover SPRMs as a class [3][6].
Ulipristal acetateModerateStudied in women

Fibroid symptoms and quality of life

Shown to improve fibroid symptom severity by about 20 points and quality of life by about 23 points on a 100-point scale, against placebo.

Compared with placebo [2][3]

The numbers and sources
Effect
On the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life scale, SPRMs improved symptom severity by 20.04 points (95% CI 13.46 to 26.63, 4 RCTs, 171 women) and health-related quality of life by 22.52 points (95% CI 12.87 to 32.17, 4 RCTs, 200 women) against placebo [3]. Both ulipristal doses improved quality of life against placebo in a US trial [2]. Pelvic pain results were too variable to draw conclusions [3].
Population
Premenopausal women with fibroids [2][3].
Sources
[3], [2]
Caveats
Moderate-quality evidence, with possible publication bias [3].
Ulipristal acetateModerateStudied in women

Emergency contraception (ella)

Shown to lower pregnancies after unprotected sex compared with levonorgestrel emergency pills, 1.8% against 2.6% within 72 hours in the largest trial.

Compared with levonorgestrel emergency contraception [7][8]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooled, ulipristal was linked to fewer pregnancies than levonorgestrel (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.99, 2 RCTs, 3,448 women) [7]. In the larger trial, pregnancies occurred in 1.8% on ulipristal and 2.6% on levonorgestrel when taken within 72 hours (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.31). Between 72 and 120 hours, all 3 pregnancies were in the levonorgestrel group [8]. In women with BMI over 30, the pregnancy rate on ulipristal was 3.1%, not significantly below the 4.5% expected without emergency contraception [9].
Population
2,221 women with regular cycles seeking emergency contraception within 5 days [8]; 115 emergency contraception trials with 60,479 women, 2 of them for this comparison [7]; women in the label trials [9].
Sources
[7], [8], [9]
Caveats
The single trial on its own did not reach significance [8]. This is a single 30 mg dose, not the 5 mg daily fibroid dose.
Uterine fibroid proceduresModerate

Heavy bleeding and satisfaction after hysterectomy

Shown to cut heavy menstrual bleeding more than a hormonal IUD or endometrial ablation, ranking first in a network meta-analysis, with low-certainty evidence.

Compared with a levonorgestrel IUD and endometrial ablation [3]; uterine artery embolization [4]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Among second-line treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding, hysterectomy ranked first for reducing blood loss (mean rank 1.2, low certainty), and minimally invasive hysterectomy ranked first for satisfaction (mean rank 1.3, low certainty). Bleeding reduction depended on the type of hysterectomy (total or subtotal), not the route [3]. Ten years after randomization, 87% of women who had a hysterectomy and 78% who had embolization were satisfied or very satisfied, and generic quality of life did not differ [4].
Population
11 trials with 1,790 participants for bleeding and 27 trials with 4,284 for satisfaction [3]; 177 Dutch women with fibroids randomized to hysterectomy or embolization, 131 answering at 10 years [4].
Sources
[3], [4]
Caveats
The network covers heavy menstrual bleeding from any cause, not only fibroids, and the ranks rest on indirect comparisons [3]. Hysterectomy ends periods and the possibility of pregnancy.
Uterine fibroid proceduresModerate

Recovery after embolization

Shown to need fewer blood transfusions than hysterectomy or myomectomy, with shorter hospital stays and a faster return to usual activities in every trial that measured them.

Compared with hysterectomy or myomectomy [5]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Blood transfusions were less likely after embolization than surgery (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.52, 2 trials, 277 women). Procedures were shorter (2 studies), hospital stays shorter (7 studies) and return to usual activities faster (6 studies), though most of these could not be pooled [5].
Population
7 RCTs with 793 women with fibroids [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
The recovery outcomes were too varied to pool into one number [5].
Uterine fibroid proceduresModerate

Heavy bleeding after embolization or myomectomy

Shown to reduce heavy bleeding about as much as myomectomy at 4 years, in one randomized trial and one pooled analysis.

Compared with myomectomy [8][7]

The numbers and sources
Effect
At 4 years in FEMME, bleeding scores, rates of amenorrhea and rates of heavy bleeding did not differ between embolization and myomectomy. Of women still menstruating, 75% after embolization and 77% after myomectomy reported regular or fairly regular periods [8]. A meta-analysis found comparable improvement in abnormal uterine bleeding [7].
Population
254 UK women randomized [8]; 13 studies [7].
Sources
[8], [7]
Caveats
One randomized trial, and a meta-analysis mostly of observational studies [7].
Uterine fibroid proceduresModerate

Laparoscopic compared with open myomectomy

Shown to cause less pain at 6 and 48 hours, about half the risk of fever and shorter hospital stays than open myomectomy, with no difference in fibroid recurrence.

Compared with open myomectomy, including mini-laparotomy [9]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pain on a 0 to 10 scale was 2.40 points lower at 6 hours (1 study, 148 women) and 1.90 points lower at 48 hours (2 studies, 80 women), with no difference at 24 hours. Fever after surgery was less likely (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.77, 6 studies, 635 women). Hospital stays were shorter, and recurrence, return to theater and conversion to open surgery did not clearly differ [9].
Population
9 RCTs with 808 premenopausal women [9].
Sources
[9]
Caveats
No trial reported uterine rupture, clots or deaths, so these could not be compared [9].
Uterine fibroid proceduresModerate

Symptoms and fibroid size after radiofrequency ablation

Shown in pooled studies, mostly without a comparison group, to shrink treated fibroids about 65% by 12 months and to improve bleeding and quality of life scores.

Compared with before treatment, in the same women [14][15]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Fibroid volume fell 46.0% at 3 months (95% CI 40.0 to 52.1, 11 studies) and 65.4% at 12 months (95% CI 56.1 to 74.7, 10 studies). All studies reported fewer women with abnormal, heavy or prolonged bleeding, mostly within 3 months, and quality of life scores improved, with most women back to work within 2 weeks [14]. A second meta-analysis found fibroid volume fell 66% at 12 months, quality of life rose 39 points and symptom severity fell 42 points, with return to normal activities after 5.2 days [15].
Population
30 studies, 3 of them randomized [14]; 32 articles with 1,283 women treated laparoscopically, transvaginally or transcervically, median age 42 [15].
Sources
[14], [15]
Caveats
Most studies had no comparison group, and the 3 randomized trials were not blinded [14]. Review [15] was funded by Gynesonics, maker of the Sonata system, and one author consulted for the company. Most studies excluded women wanting to keep fertility, so pregnancy data are insufficient [14].
ValerianModerateStudied in women

Period pain

Shown to lower period pain against placebo or NSAIDs in women with primary dysmenorrhea, in few trials with high heterogeneity.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 5 controlled trials (201 women on valerian, 207 controls), valerian reduced primary dysmenorrhea pain against placebo or NSAIDs (SMD -1.03, 95% CI -1.74 to -0.33, I² 90.40%) [5].
Population
Women with primary dysmenorrhea in RCTs published from 2000 to 2023 [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was high, the trials were few, and the comparators mixed placebo and NSAIDs. Doses and trial designs varied [5].
Vitamin B6ModerateStudied in women

Premenstrual syndrome

Shown to improve overall premenstrual symptoms and premenstrual depression over placebo in women with PMS, in mostly low-quality trials from a 1999 review.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 9 trials, women on vitamin B6 were more likely than on placebo to report better overall premenstrual symptoms (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.95 to 2.54) and better premenstrual depression (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.06, 4 trials) [4].
Population
940 women with premenstrual syndrome in 9 published trials [4].
Sources
[4]
Caveats
The authors rated most trials low quality. Doses ran up to 100 mg a day [4]. The review is from 1999.
Vitamin DModerateStudied in women

Fibroid size in women with fibroids

Shown to shrink fibroids slightly or slow their growth against placebo over 2 to 3 months in women with fibroids, most with low vitamin D, in small trials.

Compared with placebo [56][58][59]; controls the source abstract does not describe [57]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 5 randomized trials (511 participants), vitamin D lowered fibroid size against placebo (SMD -0.48, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.31), more in trials lasting over 8 weeks (SMD -0.62, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.37), and raised serum vitamin D (SMD 3.1, 95% CI 0.66 to 5.55) [56]. A second review of 3 trials (328 participants) found the percentage change in fibroid diameter or volume differed from controls by -5.7 over 2 to 6 months (95% CI -10.63 to -0.76, I² 99%). The trials gave 50,000 IU weekly for 8 or 12 weeks, or every 2 weeks for 10 weeks [57]. In one 12-week trial, fibroid volume did not fall significantly on vitamin D (MD -0.71, P 0.085) and rose on placebo (MD 2.53, P 0.001) [58]. After hysteroscopic removal of fibroids, 1,000 IU a day for 12 months halved recurrence against placebo, a difference that was not significant (P 0.17), and recurrent fibroids were 7.7 mm smaller (P < 0.001) [59].
Population
511 women with fibroids in 5 randomized trials [56]; 328 premenopausal women with fibroids and vitamin D insufficiency in 3 trials [57]; women with fibroids in a 12-week trial [58]; 109 women, mean age 37.9, after hysteroscopic myomectomy [59].
Sources
[56], [57], [58], [59]
Caveats
The trials were small and short, and heterogeneity was 99% in [57]. The two reviews share most of their trials. The abstracts do not report menstrual bleeding. The recurrence trial was a pilot, and its difference in recurrence was not significant [59].
Vitamin DModerateStudied in women

Fewer fibroids with higher vitamin D levels

Linked to fewer fibroids with higher vitamin D levels. Women with fibroids had about 6 ng/mL less vitamin D than women without, in pooled observational studies.

Compared with women without fibroids [57][60][61]; women with 25-hydroxyvitamin D below 20 or 30 ng/mL [62]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 23 observational studies (5,650 participants), women with fibroids had lower serum vitamin D (MD -5.50 ng/mL, 95% CI -6.99 to -4.01, I² 87%) and higher odds of vitamin D deficiency (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.90 to 7.24) [57]. Across 9 studies (1,730 participants), vitamin D was lower in women with fibroids (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.35), and the difference was not significant in the 2 studies from Africa [60]. Across 21 clinical studies, the difference was 5.90 ng/mL (I² 97.4%), and 26 of 29 studies found a link between low vitamin D and fibroids [61]. In a 5-year ultrasound cohort of Black women, 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 20 ng/mL or more was linked to 9.7% slower fibroid growth than below 20 ng/mL (95% CI -17.3% to -1.3%). At 30 ng/mL or more, new fibroids were 22% less common, an imprecise estimate (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.30) [62].
Population
Premenopausal women in 23 observational studies [57]; 835 women with fibroids and 895 controls in 9 studies [60]; women in 21 pooled clinical studies [61]; 1,610 Black women aged 23 to 35 in Detroit, 73% below 20 ng/mL at enrollment [62].
Sources
[57], [60], [61], [62]
Caveats
Observational. Most studies measured vitamin D once in women with and without fibroids, so they cannot show which came first. Vitamin D levels vary with body weight, skin pigmentation and sun exposure, so confounding is possible. Heterogeneity was high [57][61]. The cohort adjusted for reproductive factors, body mass index and smoking, and only 7% of its women had 30 ng/mL or more [62].
Vitamin DModerateStudied in women

PMS symptoms

Shown in one review of 5 trials to lower overall PMS severity, physical symptoms and depression, at very low certainty. Anxiety, cravings and water retention did not change.

Compared with placebo or standard care [68]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 5 RCTs (436 participants), vitamin D lowered total PMS severity (SMD -0.78, 95% CI -1.30 to -0.26), physical symptoms (SMD -1.00, 95% CI -1.99 to -0.01) and depression (SMD -0.78, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.02). Anxiety, craving and water retention did not change, and no adverse events were reported [68].
Population
5 RCTs with 436 women with PMS [68].
Sources
[68]
Caveats
Certainty was rated very low, and heterogeneity was substantial. Four of the five trials had some concerns for risk of bias [68].
Vitamin DModerateStudied in women

Ovulation, pregnancy and cycles in PCOS

Shown in one review to raise ovulation and pregnancy rates, and in another to make cycles more regular, in women with PCOS given vitamin D alongside other treatment.

Compared with placebo, metformin, short-acting contraceptives, ovulation drugs or assisted reproduction without vitamin D [69]; controls the source abstract does not describe [70]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 20 RCTs (1,961 women), adding vitamin D raised pregnancy rate (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.62) and ovulation rate (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.78) and lowered early miscarriage (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.66) [69]. Across 12 studies (849 women), cycles became more regular (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.54), with significant effects only above 4,000 IU a day, beyond 8 weeks, or with other supplements. LH fell (SMD -0.41) and FSH did not change [70].
Population
Women with PCOS seeking pregnancy, mean age about 29, most with low vitamin D at baseline [69]; 849 women with PCOS [70].
Sources
[69], [70]
Caveats
12 of the 20 trials in [69] were published in Chinese. In [69], vitamin D was added on top of the control treatment, so it measures an add-on effect. Each outcome rests on one review.
Vitamin DModerateStudied in women

Blood sugar and insulin in PCOS

Shown in one review to lower fasting glucose and insulin slightly against placebo in women with PCOS. An earlier review found changes mainly with other nutrients.

Compared with placebo [71][72]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 13 RCTs (691 women), vitamin D lowered fasting glucose by 2.91 mg/dL (95% CI 1.04 to 4.78) and insulin by 1.98 µIU/mL (95% CI 0.64 to 3.32) more than placebo, with lower triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol [71]. An earlier review of 11 RCTs (601 women) found lower fasting glucose and HOMA-IR when vitamin D was given with other micronutrients, and lower HOMA-IR at doses under 4,000 IU a day [72].
Population
Women aged 18 and older with PCOS in 13 RCTs [71]; 601 women with PCOS in 11 RCTs [72].
Sources
[71], [72]
Caveats
The changes are small. The earlier review's abstract gives no effect size and does not report a significant effect for vitamin D alone at all doses [72].
Vitamin EModerateStudied in women

Endometriosis pain, with vitamin C

Shown in pooled trials to ease pelvic pain, period pain and pain with sex in women with endometriosis when vitamin E was taken with vitamin C.

Compared with placebo [19][20][21]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 5 RCTs of vitamins C and E together, more women reported less chronic pelvic pain (RR 7.30, 95% CI 3.27 to 16.31), less period pain (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.07) and less pain with sex (RR 5.08, 95% CI 2.10 to 12.26) than on placebo [19]. A review of 13 RCTs found vitamin E, with or without vitamin C, improved pelvic pain [20]. In one trial, 1,200 IU of vitamin E with 1,000 mg of vitamin C for 8 weeks improved everyday pain in 43% of women (P = 0.0055), with no change on placebo, and period pain fell in 37% [21].
Population
5 RCTs in women with endometriosis [19]; 13 RCTs with 589 women [20]; 59 women aged 19 to 41 with pelvic pain and endometriosis or infertility [21].
Sources
[19], [20], [21]
Caveats
Vitamin E was given with vitamin C, so its share of the effect is not separated. Trials were small and lasted about 8 weeks. The second review's abstract gives no pooled size for vitamin E [20].
Vitex (chasteberry)ModerateStudied in women

Premenstrual syndrome

Shown to make remission of premenstrual symptoms about 2.6 times as likely as placebo in women, in trials of well-described extracts.

Compared with placebo [2][3][1]; placebo, dietary supplements or other herbal preparations [3]; placebo or an active comparator [4]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 3 double-blind placebo-controlled trials of the Ze 440 and BNO 1095 extracts, women on vitex were 2.57 times as likely to have a remission of symptoms (RR 2.57, 95% CI 1.52 to 4.35) [2]. Across placebo-controlled trials, the pooled effect on total premenstrual symptoms was large (Hedges g -1.21, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.88), with very high heterogeneity (I² 91%) [3]. All 8 RCTs in a third review found benefit for PMS or PMDD [4]. In the trial the EMA reviewed, 178 women improved in irritability, mood, anger, headache and breast fullness against placebo [1].
Population
520 women in 3 RCTs [2]; 14 RCTs [3]; 8 RCTs [4]; 178 women [1].
Sources
[2], [3], [4], [1]
Caveats
Review [3] found high risk of bias and signs of publication bias, and judged its pooled effect exploratory and probably an overestimate. Review [2] excluded most trials for poor description of the product used. The grade rests on the restricted analysis [2].
Vitex (chasteberry)ModerateStudied in women

Cyclic breast pain

Shown to ease cyclic breast pain against placebo, with a moderate effect, and to lower raised prolactin in women of reproductive age.

Compared with placebo [5]; dopamine agonists, NSAIDs, serotonin reuptake inhibitors and hormonal contraceptives [5]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 6 placebo-controlled studies, vitex reduced breast pain intensity (SMD 0.67, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.85). It lowered raised serum prolactin, and 7 trials found it not inferior to dopamine agonists, NSAIDs, serotonin reuptake inhibitors or hormonal contraceptives [5].
Population
718 women aged 18 to 45 in the pooled studies, among 25 studies in the review [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
Risk of bias was unclear in most studies [5].
YogaModerateStudied in women

Period pain

Shown in one meta-analysis of 4 small trials to lower period pain more than no yoga in women with primary dysmenorrhea, with a wide margin of uncertainty.

Compared with not doing yoga [19]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 4 trials, a yoga program lowered period pain more than no yoga (SMD -2.09, 95% CI -3.99 to -0.19) [19].
Population
230 women with primary dysmenorrhea, 129 doing yoga and 101 not [19].
Sources
[19]
Caveats
Four small trials, with a confidence interval that runs from a very large to a small effect. No trial compared yoga with another exercise [19].
YogaModerateStudied in women

PMS symptoms

Shown in one review of 14 studies to ease overall PMS symptoms and most symptom areas except physical symptoms, in trials that varied widely.

Compared with control groups the source abstract does not describe [20]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 11 pooled studies, yoga eased total PMS scores, and each symptom area except the physical one [20].
Population
Women with PMS in 14 studies, 11 of them pooled [20].
Sources
[20]
Caveats
The studies differed in design, yoga regimen and outcome tools, publication bias was possible, and the abstract gives no effect sizes [20].
YogaModerateStudied in women

Cycles, androgens and blood sugar in PCOS

Shown in one small meta-analysis to lower menstrual irregularity, signs of excess androgens, fasting glucose and insulin resistance in women with PCOS, at low strength of evidence.

Compared with controls the source abstract does not describe [21]; conventional physical activity, routine care or no intervention [22]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooling 2 RCTs, yoga lowered menstrual irregularity (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.08), clinical hyperandrogenism (MD -0.70, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.26), fasting glucose (MD -0.22 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.01), fasting insulin (MD -28.21 pmol/L, 95% CI -43.79 to -12.63) and HOMA-IR (MD -0.86, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.43) [21]. A 2026 review of trials with 258 participants found fasting glucose fell 4.50 mg/dL more than in controls in one trial (95% CI 2.39 to 6.61) and did not differ significantly in another. In one trial, testosterone did not change significantly and LH fell [22].
Population
515 women with PCOS in 11 studies, 2 RCTs pooled [21]; 258 women with PCOS in RCTs [22].
Sources
[21], [22]
Caveats
The authors of [21] rated the strength of evidence low. [22] could not pool its trials, and three of its five reports came from one trial.
ZincModerateStudied in women

Period pain

Shown in one meta-analysis of 6 trials to lower period pain more than placebo, with larger effects at 8 weeks or longer.

Compared with placebo [18]; placebo or no treatment [19]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 6 RCTs, zinc lowered pain severity more than placebo (Hedges's g -1.541, 95% CI -2.268 to -0.814). Longer treatment (8 weeks or more) gave larger reductions (p = 0.003), and higher doses added a small amount per milligram. Adverse events did not differ significantly from placebo (OR 2.54, 95% CI 0.78 to 8.26) [18]. In a Cochrane review, zinc sulfate lowered pain by 0.95 points on a 0 to 10 scale against placebo in one trial (95% CI 0.36 to 1.54, 99 women) [19].
Population
6 RCTs with 739 women with primary dysmenorrhea [18]; one RCT of 99 women within a review of 27 RCTs [19].
Sources
[18], [19]
Caveats
The Cochrane review rated its evidence low or very low quality [19]. The effect size in [18] is a standardized difference, not points on a pain scale.
25-hydroxyvitamin DLimitedStudied in women

Period pain

Small studies found slightly lower vitamin D in adolescents with period pain, 16.2 against 17.7 ng/mL in one, and more pain at lower levels.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In Asian adolescents, 25-hydroxyvitamin D was 16.17 ng/mL (SD 7.36) in those with primary dysmenorrhea and 17.65 (6.36) in matched controls (P = 0.01), and lower levels went with higher pain scores [29]. In 372 young women with period pain, lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D went with higher pain scores (P = 0.044) [30].
Population
205 adolescents with primary dysmenorrhea and 210 controls [29]. 372 young women at one clinic in Tehran [30].
Sources
[29], [30]
Caveats
Observational and cross-sectional. The second study had no group without period pain. The gap in the first was 1.5 ng/mL, and both groups averaged below 20 ng/mL [29][30].
AcupunctureLimitedStudied in women

Uterine fibroids

Limited evidence: unblinded trials found acupuncture shrank fibroids more than Chinese medicines or mifepristone in women with fibroids. A Cochrane review found no double-blind trials to include.

Compared with traditional Chinese medicine, and mifepristone in one trial [25]; Chinese herbal medicine alone, with acupuncture added to it [26]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 11 randomized trials (735 women), acupuncture reduced fibroid volume (MD -3.89, 95% CI -5.23 to -2.56) and uterine volume (MD -16.22, 95% CI -19.89 to -12.55) and lowered fibroid symptom scores (MD -3.03, 95% CI -3.45 to -2.60) more than the comparison treatments. Estrogen levels did not differ, and no serious adverse reactions were reported [25]. Across 9 randomized trials (640 women), acupuncture added to Chinese herbs raised the overall response rate (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.30) and reduced fibroid size (SMD -0.82, 95% CI -1.36 to -0.27, I² 90%) more than herbs alone [26]. A Cochrane review searching to May 2009 found no randomized double-blind trials that met its criteria [27].
Population
735 women with fibroids, mean age 34 to 48, in 11 trials, most treated for 3 months [25]; 640 women with fibroids in 9 trials [26].
Sources
[25], [26], [27]
Caveats
Every trial in [25] compared acupuncture with medicines taken by mouth, so no one was blinded and none used sham acupuncture, and heterogeneity was high. The authors of [26] call the trials few and of limited quality. Neither review abstract reports measured menstrual blood loss.
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)LimitedStudied in women

Across the menstrual cycle

One study found AMH relatively stable across the menstrual cycle, with a within-woman variation of 23.8% and an intraclass correlation of 0.91.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same women's samples taken every 3 to 5 days through one cycle
Effect
In 384 samples from 50 women, the within-subject coefficient of variation across the cycle was 23.8%, against 75.1% between women, and the intraclass correlation was 0.91. The authors conclude that AMH is relatively stable across the cycle [21]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine reports a modest variability within a woman of about 1.3 ng/mL across cycles, and that current guidance does not support serial testing to track ovarian reserve [11].
Population
50 women aged 18 to 45 with regular cycles at three US centers [21].
Sources
[21], [11], [12]
Caveats
One study of 50 women with one assay. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine also notes that AMH may read lower in women currently using hormonal contraceptives [12].
BremelanotideLimitedStudied in women

Satisfying sexual events

One trial found satisfying sexual events rose 0.7 a month against 0.2 on placebo in premenopausal women with sexual dysfunction.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In the dose-finding trial, satisfying sexual events rose 0.7 per month against 0.2 per month on placebo [3].
Population
327 premenopausal women with female sexual dysfunction, 12 weeks [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
One phase 2 trial. The phase 3 abstracts do not report this measure [1].
BuspironeLimitedVery common

Sexual side effects from SSRIs

One trial found 58% of people with SSRI-related sexual problems improved on added buspirone over 4 weeks, against 30% on placebo.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Among people on citalopram or paroxetine who reported decreased libido or problems with orgasm or ejaculation, about 58% improved in sexual function on added buspirone and 30% on added placebo. The difference was larger in women and appeared in the first week [9].
Population
47 of 117 participants who reported sexual dysfunction at baseline, in a trial of buspirone 20 to 60 mg a day added to an SSRI [9].
Sources
[9]
Caveats
A secondary analysis of 47 people from a trial designed to test something else [9]. Not an approved use.
CalciumLimitedStudied in women

Period pain

One small trial found calcium alone lowered period pain 1.6 points on a 10-point scale more than placebo. Calcium with vitamin D did not differ significantly.

Compared with placebo [24]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Taken from day 15 of the cycle until pain ended in the next cycle, for 3 cycles, 1,000 mg of calcium lowered mean pain intensity by 1.6 points more than placebo (95% CI 0.6 to 2.6). Calcium with 5,000 IU of vitamin D3 lowered it by 0.7 points, which was not significant (95% CI -0.3 to 1.6). Menstrual blood loss did not differ from placebo in either group [24].
Population
85 university students with moderate or severe primary dysmenorrhea in Iran [24].
Sources
[24]
Caveats
One small trial. Time and the interaction of time with group had no significant effect on pain [24].
Calcium channel blockersLimitedStudied in pregnancy

Delaying preterm birth

Small trials found calcium channel blockers, mainly nifedipine, lowered birth within 48 hours in preterm labor against placebo or no treatment.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 2 small trials against placebo or no treatment, birth within 48 hours of entry was less frequent (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.43). The two trials disagreed on birth before 37 weeks. Against other drugs used to delay labor, there was no significant reduction in birth within 48 hours or in perinatal mortality, and there were fewer maternal adverse effects than with betamimetics (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.53) [14].
Population
3,550 women in 38 trials, 35 of which used nifedipine [14].
Sources
[14]
Caveats
Only one trial was placebo controlled and blinded. The evidence is for nifedipine, a dihydropyridine. Not an FDA-approved use.
CitrullineLimitedStudied in men

Erection hardness

One small trial found erection hardness improved in 50% of men with mild erectile dysfunction on 1.5 g a day, against 8.3% on placebo.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 24 men (mean age 56.5) with mild erectile dysfunction, 1.5 g a day for a month moved erection hardness from score 3 to 4 in 12 men (50%), against 2 men (8.3%) during a month of placebo. Intercourse rose from 1.53 to 2.3 times a month [13].
Population
24 men with mild erectile dysfunction [13].
Sources
[13]
Caveats
Single-blind, not randomized in order, one month per phase, 24 men. No meta-analysis located.
D-aspartic acidLimitedStudied in men

Sperm quality in men with infertility

One trial found a product combining D-aspartic acid, ubiquinol and zinc raised sperm motility in infertile men. D-aspartic acid's own share is unknown.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In infertile men given 2,660 mg of D-aspartic acid with 200 mg of ubiquinol and 10 mg of zinc daily for 3 months, progressive sperm motility rose from 10.63 to 15.21 (p = 0.047) and total testosterone from 5.06 to 5.89 (p = 0.009). A placebo group took starch granules [7].
Population
24 men per group with idiopathic infertility in Egypt [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
A three-ingredient product, so the effect of D-aspartic acid alone cannot be separated. The abstract reports the active group's change and does not give the between-group comparison [7].
Endometriosis surgeryLimitedStudied in women

Hysterectomy compared with excision alone

Linked to fewer repeat operations and more pain relief than excision alone in women, in observational studies. By 7 years, 77% to 92% avoided reoperation, against 45%.

Compared with laparoscopic excision with the uterus and ovaries kept [11][12]; hysterectomy with and without removal of the ovaries, against each other [11][12]

The numbers and sources
Effect
At 2, 5 and 7 years, 79.4%, 53.3% and 44.6% of women had avoided further surgery after excision alone, against 95.7%, 86.6% and 77.0% after hysterectomy keeping the ovaries and 96.0%, 91.7% and 91.7% after hysterectomy with the ovaries removed. In women aged 30 to 39, removing the ovaries did not significantly lengthen surgery-free time [11]. At 24 months, against excision alone, hysterectomy keeping the ovaries improved pain outside periods by 1.41 more points out of 10, pain during sex by 1.12, back pain by 1.29 and quality of life by 8.77 out of 100. With the ovaries removed, the gains were 2.22, 1.05, 1.18 and 12.41 [12].
Population
240 women at one US clinic, 120 per group [11]. Women having surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis at 86 specialist endometriosis centers, 2009 to 2021 [12].
Sources
[11], [12]
Caveats
Neither study was randomized, so women chosen for hysterectomy may differ from others. The second study's oophorectomy result was sensitive to loss to follow-up [12]. Hysterectomy ends the ability to carry a pregnancy, and removing both ovaries brings on menopause.
EstradiolLimitedStudied in men

Body fat and sexual function in a trial that lowered estradiol in men

One trial found that blocking estradiol production in men aged 20 to 50 increased body fat and contributed to lower sexual function, while lean mass and strength followed testosterone.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Men were given a drug that suppressed their own testosterone and estradiol, then placebo or one of four doses of testosterone gel for 16 weeks. A second group also took anastrozole, which blocks the conversion of testosterone to estradiol. The authors concluded that androgen deficiency accounted for the decreases in lean mass, muscle size and strength, that estrogen deficiency primarily accounted for the increases in body fat, and that both contributed to the decline in sexual function [12].
Population
198 men aged 20 to 50 without anastrozole and 202 with it, treated for 16 weeks [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
One trial of 16 weeks in which hormone levels were set by drugs. The abstract gives no effect sizes for estradiol [12].
FenugreekLimitedStudied in men

Testosterone

Limited evidence: total testosterone rose by a small amount in men, free testosterone did not change, and certainty was very low.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 6 placebo-controlled trials, fenugreek preparations raised total testosterone by a small amount (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.48, I² 0%), while free testosterone did not change (SMD 0.08, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.63). None of 13 studies was rated low risk of bias, and certainty was very low. The authors state the evidence does not support testosterone-boosting claims [4]. An earlier meta-analysis of 4 trials reported a significant effect on total testosterone without stating its size in the abstract [5]. In 95 men aged 40 to 80, 12 weeks of an extract did not raise plasma testosterone over placebo (9.0%, p = 0.122) but raised salivary testosterone (37.2%, p = 0.042) [6].
Population
Adult men [4][5]; 95 men aged 40 to 80 who completed a 12-week trial [6].
Sources
[4], [5], [6]
Caveats
The trial in [6] was funded in part by Vitas Ltd and PurOmega Ltd, and its product also contained essential nutrients.
FenugreekLimitedStudied in women

Breast milk supply

Small trials found more breast milk than placebo. In mothers of preterm infants, the day 7 difference was gone by day 15.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a network meta-analysis of 4 studies, fenugreek increased breast milk volume over placebo (11.11, 95% CI 6.77 to 15.46). Coleus amboinicus and palm date produced larger effects than fenugreek [8]. In a 2025 trial of 68 mothers of infants born before 32 weeks, 500 mg three times a day from day 5 to day 14 after delivery gave higher milk volume than placebo on day 7 (p 0.017) but not on day 15 (p 0.073). Prolactin, infant weight and breastfeeding satisfaction did not differ [9].
Population
122 lactating women on fenugreek across 5 studies [8]; 68 mothers of preterm infants in Iran [9].
Sources
[8], [9]
Caveats
Few small studies, and the abstract of [8] does not state the unit of the milk volume estimate. The preterm trial lasted 10 days, and its day 7 difference was gone by day 15 [9].
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)LimitedStudied in men

Sperm production in men seen for infertility

Limited evidence: in men seen for infertility, higher FSH went with abnormal sperm counts, and FSH above 7.6 mIU/mL went with azoospermia caused by failed sperm production.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Among 153 men with no sperm in the ejaculate, 89% of those whose testicles were not producing sperm had FSH greater than 7.6 mIU/mL or a testicular long axis of 4.6 cm or less. Of the men with a blockage, 96% had FSH of 7.6 or less or a long axis greater than 4.6 cm. FSH alone separated the two groups with an area under the curve of 0.87 [10]. In men seen at one infertility clinic, FSH above 7.5 IU/L carried a five to thirteen times higher risk of abnormal semen quality than FSH below 2.8 IU/L, depending on the semen measure. The authors report a raised risk of abnormal sperm concentration and shape above 4.5 IU/L, a level inside their laboratory's reference range of 1.4 to 18.1 IU/L [11].
Population
153 azoospermic men evaluated from 1995 to 2000 [10]. 610 men at one urology infertility clinic from 2004 to 2008, of whom 153 were excluded [11].
Sources
[10], [11]
Caveats
Both studies are of men already being seen for infertility at single centers, so the cut points may not hold for men in general. Neither sets a reference interval.
GingerLimitedStudied in women

PMS symptoms

One small trial found PMS symptom scores fell more on ginger than placebo over 3 cycles in female students.

Compared with placebo capsules [16]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Ginger 250 mg every 12 hours, from 7 days before to 3 days after the start of bleeding for 3 cycles, lowered PMS symptom scores more than placebo at 1, 2 and 3 months (P < 0.0001), across mood, physical and behavioral symptoms. Scores did not differ before treatment [16].
Population
70 female university students with PMS in Tehran, 35 per group [16].
Sources
[16]
Caveats
One small trial. The abstract gives no effect size [16].
GnRH drugs for fibroidsLimitedStudied in women

Staying on relugolix for 2 years, or stopping

One trial found 70% still had blood loss under 80 mL after 2 years on relugolix combination therapy. After switching to placebo, 88% relapsed, at a median of 5.9 weeks.

Compared with stopping treatment by switching to placebo [4]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Among women who had responded over 52 weeks, 78.4% who continued relugolix combination therapy kept blood loss under 80 mL through week 76 against 15.1% switched to placebo, and 69.8% against 11.8% at week 104. Through week 104, 88.3% on placebo relapsed into heavy bleeding, at a median of 5.9 weeks, and 87 of 89 who restarted responded again. Amenorrhea at week 104 was 58.3% against 10.6% [4].
Population
229 women with fibroids and heavy bleeding who had responded in LIBERTY 1, 2 and the extension [4].
Sources
[4]
Caveats
Only women who had already responded were randomized. Manufacturer-sponsored trial.
Green tea extractLimitedStudied in women

Fibroid size and heavy bleeding

One small trial found green tea extract shrank fibroids by about a third over 4 months in women with symptomatic fibroids. An uncontrolled study found no size change.

Compared with placebo capsules of brown rice [13]; before treatment, in the same women [14][15]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a placebo-controlled trial, 800 mg a day of green tea extract (45% EGCG) for 4 months reduced total fibroid volume by 32.6%, while volume rose 24.3% on placebo (P 0.0001). Fibroid symptom severity fell 32.4% and quality of life rose 18.53% against placebo. In the green tea group, hemoglobin rose 0.7 g/dL (P 0.02) and average blood loss fell from 71 to 45 mL a month (P 0.001). No adverse effects or endometrial changes were seen in either group [13]. In 25 women who took green tea extract capsules for 6 months with no control group, fibroid size, symptom scores and laboratory values did not change, while the physical score of a quality of life questionnaire rose [14]. In 16 premenopausal women over 40 given 300 mg of EGCG with vitamin D and vitamin B6 for 90 days, mean fibroid size fell 17.8% and bleeding lasted 0.9 days less, with no change in flow intensity [15].
Population
39 women aged 18 to 50 with symptomatic fibroids, 33 of them analyzed [13]; 25 women, median age 45, with few or no fibroid symptoms [14]; 16 women over 40 with fibroids [15].
Sources
[13], [14], [15]
Caveats
One small trial, with 11 women finishing on placebo [13]. The hemoglobin and blood loss changes are reported within the green tea group, not as differences from placebo [13]. [14] and [15] had no control group, and [15] combined EGCG with vitamin D and vitamin B6. The trial dose supplies about 360 mg of EGCG a day [13], within the 140 to about 1,000 mg range in liver injury case reports [8].
hCGLimitedStudied in men

Pregnancy rates in male infertility

Limited evidence: hCG-combined therapy was linked to higher pregnancy rates in men with low sperm counts or after varicocele surgery, with wide intervals.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In men with oligospermia, 3 months of hCG-combined therapy was linked to higher pregnancy rates (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.38). After varicocele surgery, hCG for 3 months was linked to higher pregnancy rates (OR 34.49, 95% CI 1.88 to 632.45). In men with severe testiculopathy there was no difference (OR 5.13, 95% CI 0.27 to 98.56) [4].
Population
926 men in 7 RCTs [4].
Sources
[4]
Caveats
The search ended in December 2019. Intervals were wide, no pregnancy rate was reported for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and live births and adverse events were rarely reported [4].
hCGLimitedStudied in men

Intratesticular testosterone during testosterone use

One small trial found testosterone alone cut testicular testosterone by 94%, while adding hCG kept it near baseline at 250 to 500 IU in healthy men.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Testosterone enanthate alone suppressed intratesticular testosterone by 94%. With hCG, it rose linearly with dose: 25% below baseline at 125 IU, 7% below at 250 IU and 26% above at 500 IU [5].
Population
29 healthy men, randomized to 3 weeks of testosterone with placebo or one of three hCG doses [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
One small 3-week trial. It measured hormone levels in testicular fluid, not sperm or fertility.
hCGLimitedStudied in men

Semen during testosterone therapy

Limited evidence: in a review without controls, semen did not change in 26 men on testosterone plus hCG, and none lost sperm entirely.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Semen parameters did not change over more than a year, and no man became azoospermic. Nine of 26 men contributed to a pregnancy during follow-up [6].
Population
26 men with low testosterone, mean age 35.9, on testosterone plus hCG, mean follow-up 6.2 months [6].
Sources
[6]
Caveats
A retrospective review with no control group.
hCGLimitedStudied in men

Raising testosterone in men with low testosterone

One trial found testosterone rose from about 2.3 to 5.2 nmol/L on hCG, clomiphene or both in men with low testosterone, with no difference between groups.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Testosterone rose from a mean of 2.31 nmol/L to 5.17 nmol/L by 3 months on hCG, clomiphene or both, with no significant difference between groups. Symptom scores rose most with the combination [7].
Population
282 men with low testosterone seeking to keep fertility, randomized to three arms for 3 months [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
One short trial with no placebo arm.
HematocritLimitedStudied in men

Heart events and clots at a hematocrit of 52% or above in men on testosterone therapy

Limited evidence: one database study linked a hematocrit of 52% or above on testosterone therapy to more heart events and clots in the first year, 5.15% against 3.87%.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Among men with low testosterone who received testosterone therapy, 5,842 who reached a hematocrit of 52% or above were matched to 5,842 who did not. A major cardiovascular event or venous clot in the first year occurred in 301 (5.15%) against 226 (3.87%), an odds ratio of 1.35 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.61). Among men whose hematocrit stayed under 52%, the odds were similar with and without testosterone therapy (odds ratio 1.07, 0.98 to 1.18). The authors report that national guidelines stop or change therapy at thresholds between 50% and 55%, and that the basis for those thresholds is not cited in the guidelines [12].
Population
Men over 18 with total testosterone below 350 ng/dL in a US multi-institution records database, 86% white [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
Retrospective, from medical records. Men who reached 52% started with a higher hematocrit, a mean of 47.4%, and the groups could not be matched on it, so the authors cannot say whether the risk comes from reaching 52% or from the higher starting value. The guideline thresholds are quoted from this study, not from the guidelines themselves [12].
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)LimitedStudied in women

Premenstrual symptoms and period cramps

One cohort of midlife women linked hs-CRP above 3 mg/L to more premenstrual mood symptoms, cramps or back pain, bloating and breast pain, but not headaches.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against hs-CRP of 3 mg/L or below, a level above 3 mg/L had adjusted odds ratios of 1.27 for premenstrual mood symptoms (95% CI 1.02 to 1.58), 1.40 for abdominal cramps or back pain (1.09 to 1.80), 1.41 for appetite cravings, weight gain or bloating (1.04 to 1.89) and 1.26 for breast pain (1.02 to 1.55). It was not associated with premenstrual headaches or with reporting three or more symptoms [25].
Population
2,939 women aged 42 to 52, before or early in the menopausal transition, at the start of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, from several racial and ethnic groups [25].
Sources
[25]
Caveats
Cross-sectional, so it cannot show which came first. Covariates, body mass index among those tested, stayed in each model only if they were significant [25]. The women were in midlife, so the result may not describe younger women with period pain.
Hormonal birth controlLimitedStudied in women

Preventing pregnancy

Linked to 4.55 unintended pregnancies per 100 women a year on pills, patch or ring, against 0.27 on IUDs and implants, in a large US cohort.

Compared with IUDs and implants [1]; no comparison group in the label trials [2][3]

The numbers and sources
Effect
The failure rate was 4.55 per 100 participant-years on pills, patch or ring and 0.27 on long-acting methods (adjusted HR 21.8, 95% CI 13.7 to 34.9). Women under 21 on pills, patch or ring had almost twice the risk of older women [1]. In the label trial of drospirenone 3 mg with ethinyl estradiol 0.02 mg, the Pearl Index was 1.41 pregnancies per 100 woman-years [2]. In Mirena's extension, the cumulative pregnancy rate over years 6 to 8 was 0.68% [3].
Population
7,486 women given their choice of method at no cost in St. Louis [1]; 1,027 women aged 17 to 36 [2]; Mirena extension users [3].
Sources
[1], [2], [3]
Caveats
An observational cohort in which women chose their method [1]. Label trials have no control group.
Hormonal birth controlLimitedStudied in women

Heavy bleeding with fibroids (hormonal IUD and combined pill)

Limited evidence: in women with fibroids, the hormonal IUD lowered bleeding and raised hemoglobin more than the combined pill in one small trial, without clearly shrinking fibroids.

Compared with a low-dose combined pill and oral norethisterone acetate [27]; the levonorgestrel IUD and placebo [28]; comparisons in 11 studies the source abstract does not describe [29]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In one trial of 44 women with fibroids, the levonorgestrel IUD reduced bleeding on the alkaline hematin test by 77.50% more than a low-dose combined pill (95% CI 70.44 to 84.56) and raised hemoglobin by 1.50 g/dL more (95% CI 0.85 to 2.15) at 12 months. Fibroid size did not clearly differ (MD 1.90%, 95% CI -12.24 to 16.04). Against oral norethisterone acetate, the IUD improved a visual bleeding score and raised hemoglobin by 10.14% more at 6 months, and spotting was more common (64.3% against 30%) [27]. A review of 2 trials found the combined pill did less than the levonorgestrel IUD for bleeding, quality of life and hemoglobin, and in a single trial at high risk of bias it shrank fibroids more than placebo [28]. A review of 11 studies of 10 to 104 women each found the levonorgestrel IUD reduced menstrual blood loss and raised hemoglobin, ferritin and hematocrit, with no evidence that fibroids shrank. Expulsion was uncommon and linked to fibroids larger than 3 cm [29].
Population
221 premenopausal women with fibroids in 4 trials [27]; women with fibroids and heavy bleeding in 2 trials [28]; premenopausal women with symptomatic fibroids in 11 studies [29].
Sources
[27], [28], [29]
Caveats
The Cochrane reviewers rated all of this evidence very low quality and wrote that they were uncertain of the effects [27]. The combined pill findings rest on single trials [28]. The 11-study review abstract does not describe the studies' designs [29].
Hormonal birth controlLimitedStudied in women

Endometriosis pain after surgery (hormonal IUD)

Small trials found period pain fell more at 12 months with a hormonal IUD placed after endometriosis surgery than with no further treatment, at low certainty.

Compared with expectant management after surgery [34]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In one trial, the median fall in period pain on a visual analogue scale was 81 with the levonorgestrel IUD against 50 with no further treatment (P = 0.006, 55 women). In another, pain fell 50 points against 30 (P = 0.021, 40 women). The trials could not be pooled. Satisfaction was higher with the IUD, 75% against 50% in one trial [34].
Population
157 women having surgery for endometriosis in 4 RCTs [34].
Sources
[34]
Caveats
Certainty was low to very low, from risk of bias and imprecision. No trial reported overall pain [34].
Hormonal birth controlLimitedStudied in women

Irregular cycles in PCOS

Limited evidence: one review found cycles became regular on the pill in women with PCOS, against none without medical treatment, at low certainty.

Compared with no medical treatment, placebo or lifestyle change [35]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Cycle regularity improved in 100% on the combined pill and 0% without medical treatment, at low certainty. Hirsutism and BMI did not differ from placebo or lifestyle change, weight was 8.0 kg lower than with no treatment, and quality of life was slightly higher, all at very low certainty [35].
Population
Women with PCOS in 4 RCTs, none of which could be pooled [35].
Sources
[35]
Caveats
Only 4 small trials. The review was written for the 2023 international PCOS guideline, whose authors note that pill use in PCOS rests mostly on evidence from the general population [35].
Letrozole and clomipheneLimitedStudied in women

Pregnancy in PCOS: clomiphene compared with placebo

Limited evidence: clomiphene raised clinical pregnancy against placebo in women with PCOS, in 3 small trials of 133 women. No placebo-controlled trial reported live birth.

Compared with placebo [7]; gonadotropin injections [7]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Clomiphene was linked to more clinical pregnancies than placebo (OR 5.91, 95% CI 1.77 to 19.68). If 5% conceived on placebo, between 8% and 50% would on clomiphene. No live birth, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy or ovarian hyperstimulation data were reported against placebo. Against a gonadotropin, clomiphene was linked to fewer pregnancies, ongoing pregnancies and live births, in limited evidence [7].
Population
133 women in 3 trials, within a review of 28 trials and 3,377 women with anovulatory subfertility [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
The reviewers rated the evidence low to very low in quality, mainly for imprecision and poor reporting, and advise caution because of low event rates [7].
Luteinizing hormone (LH)LimitedStudied in men

Later illness in older men with high LH and normal testosterone

One cohort found men aged 40 to 79 with LH above 9.4 and normal testosterone more often developed cardiovascular disease, cancer and primary hypogonadism over 4.3 years.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Men who newly developed high LH had erectile dysfunction, poor health, cardiovascular disease and cancer more often than men whose LH stayed normal. In men with persistently high LH, other illnesses developed more often and cognitive and physical function declined more. Men with high LH went on to primary hypogonadism more often (odds ratio 15.97, 95% CI 5.85 to 43.60). High LH returned to normal in 46 men (2.4%) [5]. At the cohort's first survey, 9.5% of men had normal testosterone with elevated LH, a group the authors named compensated hypogonadism, 2.0% had low testosterone with elevated LH and 11.8% had low testosterone with low or normal LH [6].
Population
3,369 community-dwelling men aged 40 to 79 in eight European centers [5][6].
Sources
[5], [6]
Caveats
Observational, from one cohort. The authors describe high LH as a biomarker of deteriorating health, and report that it was not tied to unequivocal evidence of androgen deficiency [5].
Luteinizing hormone (LH)LimitedStudied in women

Polycystic ovary syndrome

One study found 75% of women with polycystic ovary syndrome had LH above the 95th percentile of controls when sampled every 10 minutes for 8 to 12 hours.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Excluding women who had ovulated in the previous 21 days, 75.0% of women with the syndrome had a pooled LH level above the 95th percentile of control women, and 94% had a raised ratio of LH to FSH. Pooled LH was within the normal range in the 9 women studied soon after an ovulation. Pooled LH fell as body mass index rose (R = -0.59) [8].
Population
61 women with polycystic ovary syndrome defined by infrequent periods and raised androgens, and 24 control women in the early follicular phase [8].
Sources
[8]
Caveats
One study of 85 women that pooled samples taken every 10 minutes, which is not how a routine single blood draw is done. The ratio of LH to FSH is a different quantity from the LH level on this page.
MacaLimited

Sexual function and desire

Small trials found better sexual function scores than placebo in some groups, including men with mild erectile dysfunction, with no effect in healthy cyclists.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A systematic review of 4 RCTs found positive effects on sexual desire or dysfunction in two, no effect in healthy cyclists in one, and better IIEF-5 scores in one trial in erectile dysfunction [1]. In 50 men with mild erectile dysfunction, 2,400 mg a day for 12 weeks raised IIEF-5 more than placebo (1.6 vs 0.5 points) [2]. In 45 women with antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, 3.0 g a day for 12 weeks gave higher remission rates than placebo, linked to postmenopausal status [3]. In 80 men with late-onset hypogonadism symptoms but normal testosterone, 12 weeks of gelatinized maca improved aging-symptom, erectile function and prostate symptom scores over placebo [4].
Population
Healthy adults, men with mild erectile dysfunction, women on SSRIs or SNRIs, older men [1][2][3][4].
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [4]
Caveats
The review judged the number of trials, sample sizes and quality too limited for firm conclusions [1].
MacaLimitedStudied in women

Menopausal symptoms

Limited evidence: four small trials reported lower menopausal symptom scores in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

The numbers and sources
Effect
All 4 RCTs in a systematic review reported favorable effects on Kupperman and Greene climacteric scores in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women [5].
Population
Healthy perimenopausal, early and late postmenopausal women [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
Few rigorous trials, and the authors state safety had not been established [5].
MagnesiumLimitedStudied in women

Period pain

Small trials found magnesium relieved period pain more than placebo and cut the need for extra pain medicine, in a 2001 review.

Compared with placebo [18]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In three small trials, magnesium gave more pain relief than placebo, and less additional pain medication was needed. The number of adverse effects did not differ [18].
Population
Women with primary dysmenorrhea in three small randomized trials [18].
Sources
[18]
Caveats
The review is from 2001 and its abstract gives no pooled size of the effect. Doses and schedules varied between trials, and the authors could not name a dose or schedule from them [18].
Opioid pain relieversLimitedStudied in men

Premature ejaculation

Limited evidence: four tramadol trials in men found longer time to ejaculation than placebo, with high heterogeneity and more side effects.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooling 4 placebo-controlled trials, tramadol lengthened intravaginal ejaculatory latency time over 8 to 12 weeks (p = 0.0007), with high heterogeneity (I² 74%). Erectile dysfunction, constipation, nausea, headache, sleepiness, dry mouth, dizziness, itching and vomiting were more frequent than on placebo or behavioral therapy [15].
Population
721 men with premature ejaculation in the 4 pooled trials, from 8 trials reviewed [15].
Sources
[15]
Caveats
Most trials were of unclear quality. Doses and durations varied, and none assessed addiction. Not an FDA-approved use [16].
Physical activityLimitedStudied in women

Endometriosis symptoms in trials

Limited evidence: a review of 6 small trials found exercise improved pain-related quality of life in women with endometriosis, from a pooled analysis of 2 trials.

Compared with activities of daily living or conventional treatment [26]

The numbers and sources
Effect
The trials reported better quality of life, pain intensity, mental health, pelvic floor function and bone density with exercise. Pooling 2 trials, the pain domain of quality of life improved (P < 0.0001), along with control and powerlessness and emotional well-being [26].
Population
251 women with endometriosis in 6 RCTs [26].
Sources
[26]
Caveats
Outcomes differed between trials and were incompletely reported, so only 2 could be pooled. Trials were short, and the abstract gives no effect size for pain [26].
ProgesteroneLimitedStudied in women

Ovulation

One study found a single progesterone of 5 ng/mL or above confirmed ovulation with 98.4% specificity and 89.6% sensitivity against ultrasound.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a study that tracked ovulation by ultrasound, a single serum progesterone of 5 ng/mL or above had a specificity of 98.4% (95% CI 96.0 to 99.5) and a sensitivity of 89.6% (85.2 to 92.9) for ovulation having occurred [6]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine uses a lower figure, above 3 ng/mL about a week before the expected period, as presumptive and sufficient evidence of recent ovulation [5].
Population
102 women over 260 menstrual cycles in a European multicenter study [6].
Sources
[6], [5]
Caveats
One study, a secondary analysis. The two sources use different cut points and neither is a reference interval. The committee opinion states that a single value does not assess the quality of the luteal phase [5].
Progestins for endometriosis and heavy bleedingLimitedStudied in women

Endometriosis pain: norethindrone acetate compared with dienogest

One small trial found norethindrone acetate 5 mg and dienogest 2 mg eased endometriosis pain in women to a similar degree over 12 months, with fewer dropouts on norethindrone acetate.

Compared with dienogest [13]; dienogest, in consecutive patients before and after a clinic switched drugs [14]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Period pain scores fell from 7.43 and 7.23 to 0 in women completing 12 months on either drug, and pelvic pain scores did not differ significantly. Endometriomas shrank more on norethindrone acetate (p = 0.037). By 6 months, 47.5% on dienogest and 23.3% on norethindrone acetate had dropped out (p = 0.026) [13]. In a clinic that changed its first-choice drug, 71% on norethindrone acetate 2.5 mg and 72% on dienogest were satisfied or very satisfied at 6 months. Treatment was well tolerated by 58% and 80% [14].
Population
70 women aged 18 to 40, 30 on norethindrone acetate and 40 on dienogest, in Turkey [13]. 90 consecutive women on each drug in Italy [14].
Sources
[13], [14]
Caveats
No placebo group. Scores at 12 months come from women who stayed on treatment [13]. The second study was not randomized [14].
Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG)Limited

Agreement between immunoassays

One study found three SHBG immunoassays agreed within 7% of each other in samples from 219 adults.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Each other, on the same serum samples
Effect
SHBG was measured with three immunoassays, from Roche, Abbott and Siemens. The largest difference was 7%, between the Abbott and Siemens assays, and free testosterone calculated from the results differed by at most 3%. When the authors shifted SHBG by 15% to imitate differences between laboratories, the share of people classed as having low or high androgen levels changed, by an amount that depended on the formula used [17].
Population
Serum samples from 113 men and 106 women [17].
Sources
[17]
Caveats
One study of three assays. The authors conclude that the choice of assay is not expected to greatly influence decisions, while variation between laboratories and the choice of formula might [17].
ShilajitLimitedStudied in men

Testosterone

One trial found purified shilajit raised total and free testosterone more than placebo in healthy men aged 45 to 55. The maker funded it.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In healthy men aged 45 to 55, purified shilajit at 250 mg twice a day for 90 days raised total testosterone, free testosterone and DHEAS more than placebo, with LH and FSH unchanged [1]. A systematic review of testosterone boosters classed purified shilajit extract (PrimaVie) as possibly raising total testosterone in men with late-onset hypogonadism [2].
Population
Healthy men aged 45 to 55 [1]. Studies of 27 proposed testosterone boosters [2].
Sources
[1], [2]
Caveats
One trial, funded by Natreon Inc, which makes PrimaVie [1]. Its abstract does not give the number of participants or the size of the change.
ShilajitLimitedStudied in men

Sperm count in men with low counts

One small study without a control group found sperm count rose 61% over 90 days in men with low sperm counts.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 28 men with sperm counts below 20 million per mL who completed 90 days of processed shilajit at 100 mg twice a day, total sperm count rose 61.4% and motility 12.4% to 17.4% from baseline. Serum testosterone rose 23.5% [3].
Population
35 men with oligospermia enrolled, 28 completed [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
No control group. Changes are against each man's own baseline [3].
SpironolactoneLimited

Lowering testosterone in feminizing hormone therapy

Limited evidence: in one clinic study, testosterone was lower with spironolactone plus estradiol than with estradiol alone, and lower still with cyproterone.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Median total testosterone was 2.0 nmol/L on estradiol plus spironolactone, 10.5 nmol/L on estradiol alone and 0.8 nmol/L on estradiol plus cyproterone acetate. Serum urea was higher on spironolactone than on cyproterone [15].
Population
114 transfeminine people on estradiol for more than 6 months at two clinics, 38 of them also on spironolactone [15].
Sources
[15]
Caveats
A retrospective cross-sectional study with no randomization. It measured hormone levels, not physical changes. Not an FDA-approved use [3].
SpironolactoneLimitedStudied in women

Hirsutism and cycles in PCOS

Small open-label trials in women with PCOS found hirsutism scores fell more with spironolactone than with metformin, and more with the two combined than with either alone.

Compared with metformin 1,000 mg a day [22][23]; metformin 1,700 mg a day alone [24]; spironolactone alone [23]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Over 6 months, the Ferriman-Gallwey hirsutism score fell from 12.9 to 8.7 on spironolactone 50 mg a day and from 12.5 to 10.0 on metformin. Menstrual cycles rose from 6.6 to 10.2 a year on spironolactone and from 5.7 to 9.1 on metformin (P = 0.0037). Testosterone fell in both groups, and weight and blood pressure did not change [22]. In a three-arm trial, spironolactone 50 mg plus metformin raised cycles a year and lowered hirsutism score, total testosterone and glucose and insulin area under the curve more than either drug alone (P < .05) [23]. Adding spironolactone 25 mg to metformin lowered the hirsutism score more than metformin alone (P < 0.001), while regular menses returned in 68% on the combination and 82% on metformin alone [24].
Population
82 adolescent and young women with PCOS randomized, 69 completing, mean age 22.6 [22]; 198 women with PCOS randomized, 169 completing [23]; 56 women with PCOS [24].
Sources
[22], [23], [24]
Caveats
All three trials were open-label, small and lasted 6 months, with no placebo group. Two came from the same research group [22][23]. Not an FDA-approved use [3].
Tongkat aliLimited

Muscle strength

One small study without placebo found higher testosterone and grip strength over 5 weeks in active adults aged 57 to 72. The maker funded it.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 25 physically active adults aged 57 to 72, 400 mg a day for 5 weeks raised total and free testosterone and handgrip force in men and women [7].
Population
13 men and 12 women, single group [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
No placebo group. Funded by Biotropics Malaysia [7].
Total testosteroneLimited

Polycystic ovary syndrome in a genetic study of women

One genetic study found each standard deviation of genetically higher testosterone raised the odds of polycystic ovary syndrome in women by about half.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a Mendelian randomization analysis, a genetically determined 1 standard deviation higher testosterone raised the odds of polycystic ovary syndrome in women (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.72). The authors also report adverse effects of higher testosterone on breast and endometrial cancers in women and on prostate cancer in men, without figures in the abstract [19].
Population
425,097 UK Biobank participants, with 2,571 genome-wide significant associations for testosterone and related traits [19].
Sources
[19]
Caveats
One genetic study. Genetic estimates describe lifelong differences, not the effect of changing the level later in life.
Tranexamic acidLimitedStudied in women

Heavy bleeding in women with fibroids

One pooled analysis of the two label trials found blood loss fell more than on placebo in women with fibroids, as it did in women without them.

Compared with placebo [6]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In women with and without fibroids on ultrasound, mean menstrual blood loss fell more than on placebo in every treatment cycle (p < 0.001). The reduction against placebo was larger in women with fibroids than in women without. Adverse events were similar between groups [6]. About 40% of the women in the label trials had fibroids [4].
Population
Women with heavy menstrual bleeding in the two pivotal phase 3 trials, with fibroids assessed by transvaginal ultrasound [6].
Sources
[6], [4]
Caveats
The abstract gives no blood loss volumes, and the full text could not be read. The trials did not report fibroid size or location, so the result may not hold for large or submucosal fibroids.
Tranexamic acidLimitedStudied in women

Bleeding after childbirth (intravenous)

One large trial found intravenous tranexamic acid lowered death from bleeding in women bleeding after childbirth, 1.5% against 1.9% on placebo. Hysterectomy did not change.

Compared with placebo, on top of usual care [7]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Death due to bleeding occurred in 155 of 10,036 women (1.5%) on tranexamic acid and 191 of 9,985 (1.9%) on placebo (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.00), and 1.2% against 1.7% when given within 3 hours of birth (RR 0.69). Hysterectomy (3.6% against 3.5%) and the combined end point of death or hysterectomy did not differ. Adverse events, including clots, did not differ significantly [7].
Population
20,060 women with postpartum hemorrhage in 193 hospitals in 21 countries [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
This is 1 g given into a vein, not the tablets. One trial, with funding that included Pfizer [7].
Why limited
This rests on one trial, of 20,060 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
TurmericLimited

Cancer

Small trials found higher tumor response added to chemotherapy in women with advanced breast cancer, without placebo. A stomach trial measured markers, not cancer.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 120 women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, adding 1 g a day of curcumin with 1% piperine to chemotherapy for 12 to 24 weeks raised objective response from 8.33% to 38.33% at 4 weeks after treatment and from 10.64% to 43.40% at 12 weeks [46]. In 48 people with precancerous stomach changes, 1,000 mg a day of Meriva for 6 months lowered IL-1beta in the stomach lining, while histology and DNA damage did not differ from placebo [47].
Population
Women with breast cancer on chemotherapy [46]; adults with atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia in Puerto Rico and Honduras [47].
Sources
[46], [47]
Caveats
Two small trials. The breast cancer trial compared chemotherapy alone with no placebo, and its abstract gives no progression-free survival figures [46]. The stomach trial measured markers, not cancer cases [47].
Uterine fibroid proceduresLimited

Symptoms after focused ultrasound

Limited evidence: symptom scores fell about 50% after MRI-guided focused ultrasound in pooled studies with no comparison treatment, and quality of life improved.

Compared with before treatment, in the same women [11][12]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooled, the treated share of fibroid volume (non-perfused volume) was 67.60% (95% CI 55.58 to 79.62), symptom severity scores changed about 54% (95% CI 41% to 66%) at 3, 6 and 12 months, and health-related quality of life improved [11]. Across uterine-sparing treatments, quality of life improved after every option, and least after focused ultrasound [12].
Population
Randomized, non-randomized and crossover studies of MR-guided focused ultrasound [11]; 85 studies with 17,789 women [12].
Sources
[11], [12]
Caveats
Mostly single-group studies, so part of the change may not be due to treatment. The reviewers note results improved as protocols aimed for total ablation [11].
Vitamin B12LimitedStudied in pregnancy

Infant development with B12 in pregnancy

One trial found slightly higher infant mental development scores at 250 µg than at 50 µg a day in vegetarian pregnant women in India and Nepal.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Infants of mothers given 250 µg of methylcobalamin a day had higher mental development scores at 9 to 12 months than infants of mothers given 50 µg (103.7 against 101.7, p = 0.008). Motor scores did not differ. Maternal B12 rose more on the higher dose (104.9 against 47.5 pg/mL) [9].
Population
531 vegetarian women in India and Nepal, from the first trimester to 6 months after birth [9].
Sources
[9]
Caveats
One trial comparing two doses, with no placebo group. Newborn size, APGAR scores and illness did not differ [9].
Vitamin B12 levelLimited

Neural tube defects in pregnancy

Limited evidence: one Irish study linked the lowest quarter of pregnancy B12 to two to three times the odds of a neural tube defect.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 3 independent nested case-control groups, mothers of affected children had significantly lower B12 status. Women in the lowest quartile, compared with the highest, had between two and threefold higher adjusted odds of being the mother of an affected child. Pregnancy blood concentrations below 250 ng/L (250 pg/mL) were associated with the highest risks [5].
Population
Irish women sampled at an average of 15 weeks of pregnancy: 95 affected pregnancies and 265 controls, 107 women with a previous affected birth and 414 controls, and 76 affected pregnancies and 222 controls [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
Observational, from one population with a high prevalence of neural tube defects and no folic acid fortification. No trial of B12 for this outcome is cited here [5].
Vitex (chasteberry)LimitedStudied in women

Menstrual cycle complaints in routine care

One uncontrolled study by the manufacturer found most women reported lighter, less frequent bleeding and less period pain after 3 months, with no comparison group.

Compared with before treatment, in the same women [7]

The numbers and sources
Effect
After 3 months of a 4 mg extract, 83.4% reported improved bleeding intensity, 79.2% improved bleeding frequency and 85.2% less period pain. Irregular cycles fell from 9.1% to 0.1% of women and breast tenderness from 39.9% to 0.8%. Cycle and period length did not change meaningfully [7].
Population
1,700 women with menstrual cycle complaints, mean age 30, mostly period pain (43.8%) and breast pain (21.1%), at one center [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
Retrospective, single center, no control group, outcomes collected partly by telephone. Five authors were employees of the manufacturer, which funded the data management, statistics and writing support [7].

Reported risks121

Alpha-blockersStrongStudied in menVery common

Ejaculation problems

Shown to raise ejaculation problems, most with silodosin, 28% against 1% on placebo, and on tamsulosin 8% at 0.4 mg. Doxazosin and terazosin were similar to placebo.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Ejaculatory dysfunction was more frequent on alpha-blockers than placebo (OR 5.88), on tamsulosin (OR 8.58) and on silodosin (OR 32.5), and less frequent on tamsulosin than on silodosin (OR 0.09). Doxazosin and terazosin were similar to placebo [21]. Silodosin raised sexual adverse events against placebo (RR 26.07, 180 more per 1,000) and against tamsulosin (RR 6.05, 141 more per 1,000) [2]. Retrograde ejaculation was 28.1% on silodosin and 0.9% on placebo, and 2.8% stopped silodosin for it [5]. Abnormal ejaculation was 8.4% on tamsulosin 0.4 mg, 18.1% on 0.8 mg and 0.2% on placebo [4].
Population
23 randomized trials [21]; 1,968 men against placebo and 2,129 against tamsulosin [2]; 923 men [5]; 1,487 men [4].
Sources
[21], [2], [5], [4]
Caveats
The silodosin label states retrograde ejaculation reversed after stopping [5]. Ejaculatory problems were linked to greater symptom improvement in the meta-analysis [21].
Uterine fibroid proceduresStrongVery common

Another procedure after embolization

Shown to raise the need for further surgery against hysterectomy or myomectomy, 15% to 32% within 2 years against 7%. In one trial, 35% had a hysterectomy within 10 years.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Further surgery was more likely after embolization than surgery within 2 years (OR 3.72, 95% CI 2.28 to 6.04, 6 trials, 732 women) and within 5 years (OR 5.79, 95% CI 2.65 to 12.65, 2 trials). If 7% need more surgery within 2 years of hysterectomy or myomectomy, 15% to 32% did after embolization [5]. Against myomectomy, reintervention (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.10) and later hysterectomy (OR 4.04, 95% CI 3.45 to 4.72) were more likely at 4 years [7]. Pooled, 14.4% (95% CI 9.8 to 19.6) needed another procedure within 5 years [12]. In the EMMY trial, 28 of 81 women (35%) had a hysterectomy within 10 years of embolization [4].
Population
7 RCTs with 793 women [5]; 13 studies [7]; 85 studies with 17,789 women [12]; 81 Dutch women [4].
Sources
[5], [7], [12], [4]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was moderate to high in the pooled estimates (I² 45% to 65%) [5].
BenzodiazepinesModerateVery common

Sexual side effects

Shown to raise reports of decreased libido, in 14% on alprazolam against 8% on placebo in panic trials, and of sexual dysfunction in 7% against 4%.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In alprazolam panic disorder trials, decreased libido was reported by 14% against 8% on placebo, increased libido by 8% against 4%, sexual dysfunction by 7% against 4% and menstrual disorders by 11% against 9% [18].
Population
1,388 adults on alprazolam and 1,231 on placebo in trials of up to 10 weeks [18].
Sources
[18]
Caveats
One drug, at the higher doses used for panic disorder.
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in womenVery common

Irregular bleeding, headache and nausea

Shown to raise irregular bleeding, headache and nausea on combined pills, irregular bleeding in 39% to 60% against 18% on placebo. Bleeding changes led most implant stops.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Against placebo, combined pills raised irregular bleeding (RR 2.63), from 18% to between 39% and 60%, headache (RR 1.51), nausea (RR 1.64) and any adverse event (RR 1.31) [5]. In implant trials, bleeding pattern changes were the most common reason for stopping (11.1%), and bleeding ranged from none in about 1 in 5 women to frequent or prolonged [11].
Population
Women in dysmenorrhea trials [5]; etonogestrel implant trials [11].
Sources
[5], [11]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was moderate for some outcomes [5].
Opioid pain relieversModerateVery common

Low testosterone and adrenal hormones

Linked to lower testosterone in men who use opioids regularly, with hypogonadism in 63% of male long-term users across 15 studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In 17 studies, mean testosterone was lower in men using opioids than in controls (mean difference -164.78, 95% CI -245.47 to -84.08, reported in the abstract without a unit). Testosterone in women was not affected [23]. Across 15 studies of long-term users, 99.5% of them male, hypogonadism was present in 63% (95% CI 55% to 70%). Low cortisol was present in 15% (95% CI 6% to 28%) across 5 studies, and raised prolactin was found in 5 of 7 studies [24]. The oxycodone label states that cases of androgen deficiency have occurred with extended use and that adrenal insufficiency has been reported, more often after more than a month of use [20].
Population
800 opioid users and 1,969 controls in 17 studies, 10 cross-sectional and 7 cohort [23]; 18,428 people in 52 studies, most with chronic pain or on maintenance treatment for opioid addiction [24].
Sources
[23], [24], [20]
Caveats
Observational, with high heterogeneity. Methadone and morphine were the opioids most often studied, not hydrocodone, oxycodone or tramadol [24].
Progestins for endometriosis and heavy bleedingModerateStudied in womenVery common

Irregular bleeding and spotting

Shown to cause irregular bleeding more often than leuprolide. The injection label lists irregular bleeding or spotting in 18% of women, its most frequent side effect.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In the injection's contraception trials, irregular, heavier, lighter or spotting bleeding was reported by 18% and absent periods by 6%. In its endometriosis trials, 24% of 289 women had no period during month 6. Bleeding was the most common reason for stopping (3%) [1]. The injection caused more irregular bleeding than leuprolide [10], and dienogest suppressed bleeding less than leuprolide [9].
Population
2,325 women in five injection trials [1]. 274 women [10]. 252 women [9].
Sources
[1], [10], [9]
Caveats
The label's rates come from trials with no placebo group [1].
SSRIsModerateVery common

Sexual side effects

Shown to raise sexual side effects against placebo: ejaculation problems in 8% to 14% of men against 1% to 2%, and lower desire in both sexes.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In pooled sertraline trials, men reported ejaculation failure (8% vs 1% on placebo), decreased libido (7% vs 2%) and erectile dysfunction (4% vs 1%), and women reported decreased libido (4% vs 2%) [24]. In escitalopram anxiety trials, ejaculation disorder occurred in 14% of men vs 2%, decreased libido in 7% vs 2% and anorgasmia in 6% of women vs under 1% [25]. A meta-analysis that included studies asking about sexual function directly found sexual dysfunction in 25.8% to 80.3% of patients on the drugs that differed from placebo, which included sertraline, citalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine and escitalopram [31].
Population
3,066 adults on sertraline and 2,293 on placebo in trials of 8 to 12 weeks [24]; 429 adults with generalized anxiety disorder on escitalopram and 427 on placebo [25]; patients in antidepressant studies pooled by drug [31].
Sources
[24], [25], [31]
Caveats
The labels state that rates from spontaneous reports in trials may underestimate the true incidence [24]. The meta-analysis included open-label studies and differing scales, which its authors say could weaken the findings [31]. Sexual symptoms can also come from the condition being treated.
Testosterone therapyModerateStudied in menVery common

Lower sperm production and fertility

Shown to stop sperm production in 65% of healthy men at contraceptive doses. Sperm recovered in 90% within 12 months and all within 24 months of stopping.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In 271 healthy fertile men given 200 mg testosterone enanthate weekly, 65% had no sperm in three consecutive samples by 6 months, after a mean of 120 days. After injections stopped, the median time to a sperm concentration of at least 20 million per mL was 3.7 months [19]. Across 30 studies of 1,549 men on testosterone alone or with a progestogen, the probability of sperm recovering to 20 million per mL was 67% within 6 months, 90% within 12 months, 96% within 16 months and 100% within 24 months of stopping. Recovery was slower after longer treatment and longer-acting testosterone preparations [20].
Population
Healthy men aged 18 to 51 with normal testosterone, studied as male contraception [19][20].
Sources
[19], [20]
Caveats
These are contraception studies in men with normal testosterone, at doses chosen to stop sperm production. They do not report rates for men treated for low testosterone. The pooled analysis includes regimens that added a progestogen [20].
Uterine fibroid proceduresModerateVery common

Another procedure after myomectomy

Linked to further treatment within 5 years in 12% after myomectomy and 7% after hysteroscopic removal of fibroids inside the uterus, in pooled studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
At 60 months, reintervention was 12.2% (95% CI 5.2 to 21.2) after myomectomy and 7% (95% CI 4.8 to 9.5) after hysteroscopic treatment [12].
Population
85 studies with 17,789 women [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
One meta-analysis with substantial differences between study populations [12].
Uterine fibroid proceduresModerateVery common

Complications of embolization and surgery

Shown to double minor complications within a year against surgery. Major complications did not clearly differ, and one trial found complications in 24% against 29% after myomectomy.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Minor complications within one year were more likely after embolization (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.81, 6 trials, 735 women), and up to 5 years (OR 2.93, 2 trials). Major complications within a year (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.26) and complications during the procedure (OR 0.91) did not clearly differ [5]. In FEMME, complications around and after the initial procedure occurred in 24% after embolization and 29% after myomectomy [6]. Against myomectomy, early complications were less likely after embolization (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.95) [7].
Population
7 RCTs with 793 women [5]; 254 women in FEMME [6]; 13 studies [7].
Sources
[5], [6], [7]
Caveats
Trials were not large enough for rare serious events, and definitions of minor complications varied [5].
Endometriosis surgeryLimitedStudied in womenVery common

Endometriosis coming back, and repeat surgery

Limited evidence: endometriosis returned in an estimated 21.5% of women by 2 years after surgery and 40% to 50% by 5 years.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
A review of published series estimated recurrence at 21.5% at 2 years and 40% to 50% at 5 years, with few consistent risk factors [14]. In one US clinic, 20.6% of women needed more surgery within 2 years of excision alone, 46.7% within 5 years and 55.4% within 7 years [11]. One year after endometrioma surgery, 32% needed more surgery after drainage and ablation and 3% to 16% after excision [10].
Population
Published surgical series [14]. 120 women after excision [11]. Women in endometrioma trials [10].
Sources
[14], [11], [10]
Caveats
The recurrence estimate comes from a narrative review, not a meta-analysis, and studies defined recurrence differently [14].
Letrozole and clomipheneLimitedStudied in womenVery common

Ovarian enlargement, hot flushes and other common side effects

The clomiphene label lists ovarian enlargement in 13.6% and hot flushes in 10.4% of women in its trials. Against clomiphene, letrozole had fewer hot flushes but more fatigue and dizziness.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In 8,029 patients in the clomiphene trials, reported adverse events were ovarian enlargement 13.6%, hot flushes 10.4%, abdominal or pelvic discomfort and bloating 5.5%, nausea and vomiting 2.2%, breast discomfort 2.1%, headache 1.3% and abnormal uterine bleeding 1.3% [1]. In PPCOS II, hot flushes were more common on clomiphene, fatigue and dizziness were more common on letrozole, and other adverse events were similar [5].
Population
8,029 women in uncontrolled label trials [1]. 750 women with PCOS [5].
Sources
[1], [5]
Caveats
The label trials had no placebo group, and the label notes 498 patients may have been counted twice [1]. The PPCOS II abstract does not give the rates [5].
109 more
Modafinil and armodafinilLimitedStudied in pregnancyVery common

Pregnancy

Mixed results: a pregnancy registry found major birth defects in 13% of exposed live births against a 3% population rate, while a French national cohort found no clear rise.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In the 14-year manufacturer pregnancy registry, major congenital malformations occurred in 13.1% of prospectively enrolled live births (18 of 137, 95% CI 8.0 to 20.0) against a population rate of 3%. Spontaneous abortion occurred in 10.9% [18]. In French national data, first-trimester modafinil exposure was linked to more major anomalies than methylphenidate (aRR 1.77, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.07), but not clearly more than matched unexposed children (aRR 1.23, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.99), with no rise in neurodevelopmental disorders [19]. The labels report fetal growth restriction and miscarriage cases and developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits [3][6].
Population
191 pregnancies, 137 prospective live births [18]; 865 children exposed to modafinil among 10,955,766 births [19].
Sources
[18], [19], [3], [6]
Caveats
The registry compared with an outside population rate, not a matched group, and was small [18]. The cohort's intervals were wide [19]. The band above is the registry rate. Two 2020 Scandinavian studies were not readable from an open source and are left out.
SpironolactoneLimitedStudied in womenVery common

Irregular periods

Limited evidence: menstrual disorders were reported by about 12% of women taking spironolactone for hair loss, in studies with no placebo group.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In a review of studies in female pattern hair loss, menstrual disorders were reported in 11.85% of women, scalp itching or increased scurf in 18.92% and facial hair growth in 6.93% [13]. A Cochrane review of hirsutism treatments lists irregular bleeding as a known adverse event of spironolactone [12]. The label lists irregular menses, amenorrhea and postmenopausal bleeding [3].
Population
Women with female pattern hair loss in randomized and observational studies [13].
Sources
[13], [12], [3]
Caveats
No placebo rate is available, and rates varied widely between studies [13].
Thiazide diureticsLimitedVery common

Erection problems

One trial found more erection problems on chlorthalidone than placebo over 2 years, 17.1% against 8.1%, with rates similar by 4 years.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Among men in a double-blind trial of five blood pressure drugs, erection problems through 24 months were reported by 17.1% on chlorthalidone and 8.1% on placebo (P = 0.025). Through 48 months the rates were more similar across groups. Reported sexual problems in women were infrequent and did not differ by drug [24].
Population
557 men and 345 women aged 45 to 69 with mild hypertension, all given lifestyle counseling [24].
Sources
[24]
Caveats
One trial, of chlorthalidone. The abstract does not give the number of men in each group.
Ulipristal acetateLimitedVery common

Change in timing of the next period (ella)

After the emergency dose, 19% had their next period more than 7 days late and 7% more than 7 days early, with cycles about 2.5 days longer on average.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In clinical trials, cycle length rose a mean 2.5 days and returned to normal the next cycle. Seven percent reported menses more than 7 days early and 19% more than 7 days late [9]. Ulipristal users were more likely than levonorgestrel users to have periods return after the expected date [7].
Population
Women in the emergency contraception trials [7][9].
Sources
[9], [7]
Caveats
Single-arm label data for the percentages [9].
Uterine fibroid proceduresLimitedVery common

Another procedure after focused ultrasound

Linked to further treatment within 5 years in 29% to 54% after focused ultrasound in pooled studies, more after MRI-guided than ultrasound-guided treatment.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
One meta-analysis found 53.9% (95% CI 47.2 to 60.4) needed another procedure within 60 months [12]. A second found reintervention rates of 1%, 7%, 19% and 29% at 12, 24, 36 and 60 months, lower after ultrasound-guided than MRI-guided treatment, and 15% at 60 months when more than half the fibroid volume was ablated [17].
Population
85 studies with 17,789 women [12]; 18 studies with 5,216 women [17].
Sources
[12], [17]
Caveats
The two pooled estimates at 5 years differ widely, and both rest on observational studies [12][17].
Uterine fibroid proceduresLimitedVery common

Another procedure after radiofrequency ablation

Limited evidence: further treatment for fibroid symptoms reached 4.2%, 8.2% and 11.5% by years 1, 2 and 3 after radiofrequency ablation in one industry-funded pooled analysis.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
The annual cumulative reintervention rate for fibroid symptoms was 4.2%, 8.2% and 11.5% through 3 years [15]. Hysterectomy after ablation ranged from 1.0% (2 of 205) to 24.1% (15 of 62) across studies with 45 days to 74 months of follow-up [14].
Population
1,283 women in 32 articles [15]; 30 studies [14].
Sources
[15], [14]
Caveats
Few studies followed women long enough [14]. Review [15] was funded by Gynesonics.
ADHD stimulantsModerateStudied in pregnancyCommon

Pregnancy

Linked to a small rise in heart malformations with methylphenidate in early pregnancy, 18.8 against 12.7 per 1,000 infants, and no rise with amphetamines.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In US data, cardiac malformations occurred in 18.8 per 1,000 infants exposed to methylphenidate, 15.4 per 1,000 exposed to amphetamines and 12.7 per 1,000 unexposed. After adjustment, the relative risk of cardiac malformations was 1.28 for methylphenidate (95% CI 0.94 to 1.74), and 1.28 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.64) when pooled with Nordic data. For amphetamines it was 0.96 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.19). Any malformation did not differ significantly for either drug [31]. The amphetamine label states that published studies have not identified a drug-associated risk of major birth defects or miscarriage, and that premature delivery and low birth weight have been seen in infants of mothers taking amphetamines [17]. The methylphenidate label describes the published findings as inconsistent [21].
Population
1,813,894 pregnancies in the US and 2,560,069 in the Nordic countries [31].
Sources
[31], [17], [21]
Caveats
Observational. The pooled confidence interval for methylphenidate reaches 1.00, and the unadjusted rates above differ more than the adjusted risks do.
Atomoxetine and viloxazineModerateCommon

Urinary hesitation and erectile problems in adults, atomoxetine

Shown to raise urinary hesitation to 5.6% against 0.5% and urinary retention to 1.7% against none in adults, and erectile dysfunction to 8% of men against 1%.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In adult trials, urinary hesitation occurred in 5.6% (30 of 540) against 0.5%, and urinary retention in 1.7% (9 of 540) against 0%. Erectile dysfunction occurred in 8% of men against 1%. Rare cases of priapism, an erection lasting over 4 hours, were reported after approval in children and adults [9].
Population
540 adults on atomoxetine and 402 on placebo, and 943 men on atomoxetine against 869 on placebo [9].
Sources
[9]
Caveats
Priapism reports have no denominator.
Atypical antipsychoticsModerateStudied in pregnancyCommon

Pregnancy

Not linked to a meaningful rise in birth defects after adjustment in a cohort of 1.3 million pregnancies. The label warns of movement and withdrawal symptoms in newborns.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Congenital malformations were diagnosed in 44.5 per 1,000 births exposed to an atypical antipsychotic in the first trimester and 32.7 per 1,000 unexposed. After adjustment for confounding, the relative risk was 1.05 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.16), with similar findings for cardiac malformations [21]. The quetiapine label states that exposure in the third trimester may cause extrapyramidal or withdrawal symptoms in newborns [3].
Population
1,341,715 pregnancies, 9,258 with an atypical antipsychotic prescription filled in the first trimester [21].
Sources
[21], [3]
Caveats
Observational. The band above is the unadjusted malformation rate in exposed births, which did not differ meaningfully from unexposed births after adjustment. A small increase was seen for risperidone, a drug not covered here.
BenzodiazepinesModerateStudied in pregnancyCommon

Pregnancy and newborns

Mixed results: birth defects were not clearly raised, while miscarriage, preterm birth and newborn intensive care were linked to exposure in observational studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Congenital malformations occurred in 222 of 5,195 exposed pregnancies and 64,335 of 2,082,467 unexposed (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.30). The odds ratio was 1.40 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.80) when a benzodiazepine was taken together with an antidepressant [34]. Exposure was associated with spontaneous abortion (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.42), preterm birth (OR 1.96), low birth weight (OR 2.24) and newborn intensive care admission (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.64 to 4.14) [35]. In a Quebec cohort, early pregnancy exposure was associated with spontaneous abortion after adjustment for mood and anxiety disorders (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.12) [36]. The label states that use late in pregnancy can cause sedation and withdrawal symptoms in the newborn [18].
Population
8 studies of malformations [34]; studies of 9 pregnancy and delivery outcomes [35]; 442,066 pregnancies, 27,149 ending in spontaneous abortion [36].
Sources
[34], [35], [36], [18]
Caveats
Observational, with significant heterogeneity for most delivery outcomes, and confounding by the conditions being treated cannot be ruled out [35]. The band above is the malformation count in exposed pregnancies, about 4 in 100 against about 3 in 100 unexposed.
FinasterideModerateStudied in menCommon

Sexual side effects during treatment

Mixed results: one review found erectile dysfunction rose, one extra case per 82 men treated, while another found no rise in overall sexual dysfunction.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Pooled, erectile dysfunction rose on finasteride (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.78), one extra case for every 82 men treated. Any sexual disturbance had an RR of 1.39 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.95). Stopping for sexual side effects did not differ from placebo [2]. A second meta-analysis found an RR for sexual dysfunction of 1.66 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.30) on finasteride 1 mg [8]. A network meta-analysis found finasteride 1 mg and 5 mg did not differ from placebo in global sexual dysfunction [9]. In the label's year-one data, decreased libido occurred in 1.8% against 1.3% on placebo, erectile dysfunction in 1.3% against 0.7% and ejaculation disorder in 1.2% against 0.7% [10].
Population
12 RCTs with 3,927 men [2]; 15 RCTs with 4,495 men on finasteride or dutasteride [8]; RCTs of finasteride and dutasteride [9]; 945 on finasteride and 934 on placebo [10].
Sources
[2], [8], [9], [10]
Caveats
The meta-analyses disagree on whether sexual dysfunction overall rises [8][9]. A review of 34 finasteride hair loss trials found none had adequate safety reporting. Funnel plots suggested sexual effects were systematically underdetected, 56% of trials were funded by the manufacturer, and 76% evaluated safety for 1 year or less [11].
GabapentinoidsModerateCommon

Pregnancy

Not linked to major birth defects after adjustment in two large cohorts, while gabapentin late in pregnancy was linked to preterm birth and small babies.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Of 477 infants exposed to pregabalin in the first trimester, 5.9% had malformations against 3.3% of unexposed infants. After adjustment the relative risk was 1.16 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.67), and 1.02 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.51) pooled for pregabalin taken alone [25]. For gabapentin in the first trimester, the adjusted relative risk was 1.07 for major malformations (95% CI 0.94 to 1.21) and 1.12 for cardiac defects (95% CI 0.89 to 1.40). Exposure both early and late in pregnancy was associated with preterm birth (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.36), small-for-gestational-age infants (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.60) and neonatal intensive care admission (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.52) [26]. Both labels state there are no adequate studies in pregnant women and that the drug caused developmental harm in animals [19][7].
Population
477 pregabalin-exposed infants in US Medicaid data and 174 in a commercial database [25]; 4,642 gabapentin-exposed pregnancies among 1,753,865 [26].
Sources
[25], [26], [19], [7]
Caveats
Observational. The band above is the unadjusted malformation rate in pregabalin-exposed infants, which did not differ significantly from unexposed infants after adjustment. Among women with two or more gabapentin dispensings, cardiac defects were more frequent (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.90) [26].
LamotrigineModerateStudied in pregnancyCommon

Pregnancy and birth defects

Mixed results: major birth defects in 2% to 3% of exposed infants, a rate one review found higher than in women without epilepsy and others found similar to comparison groups.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Pregnancy registries reported major malformations in 2.2% (95% CI 1.6 to 3.1) of 1,558 infants exposed to lamotrigine alone in the first trimester, 2.0% of 1,562 in a second registry and 2.9% of 2,514 in a third, against a US background of 2% to 4%. One registry found isolated oral clefts at 3.2 per 1,000, a threefold rise, not seen in other registries [4]. A Cochrane review found a higher risk than in children of women without epilepsy in cohort studies (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.39, about 1% more), but not against women with untreated epilepsy (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.63) or in health record studies (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.64) [16]. A network meta-analysis found no raised risk against unexposed controls (OR 0.96, 95% CrI 0.72 to 1.25) [17].
Population
Infants in pregnancy registries [4]; 49 studies, with over 2,700 lamotrigine-exposed children in one comparison [16]; 96 studies with 58,461 patients [17].
Sources
[4], [16], [17]
Caveats
Most exposed pregnancies were in women with epilepsy. The label notes that lamotrigine lowered fetal folate in rats and that its blood levels fall during pregnancy [4].
Letrozole and clomipheneModerateStudied in womenCommon

Multiple pregnancy

The clomiphene label reports 8% of pregnancies in its trials were multiple. Pooled PCOS trials found multiple pregnancy in 2.2% of women on clomiphene and 1.6% on letrozole.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Of 2,369 pregnancies with known outcome in the clomiphene trials, 7.98% were multiple: 6.9% twins, 0.5% triplets, 0.3% quadruplets and 0.1% quintuplets [1]. In pooled PCOS trials, multiple pregnancy occurred in 2.2% on selective estrogen receptor modulators and 1.6% on letrozole (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.32) [3]. In PPCOS II, 7.4% of clomiphene pregnancies and 3.4% of letrozole pregnancies were twins, not a significant difference [5]. In AMIGOS, multiple gestations made up 9% of ongoing clomiphene pregnancies, 13% of letrozole pregnancies and 32% of gonadotropin pregnancies. All those on the oral drugs were twins, while gonadotropins produced 24 twin and 10 triplet pregnancies [12]. Twin pregnancy did not differ between letrozole and clomiphene in unexplained infertility (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.68) [10].
Population
2,369 pregnancies in uncontrolled label trials [1]. 2,247 women in 14 trials [3]. 750 women with PCOS [5]. 900 women with unexplained infertility [12].
Sources
[1], [3], [5], [12], [10]
Caveats
None of these trials had an untreated group, so the rates show how often multiple pregnancy occurred on each drug, not how much each drug raised it.
Letrozole and clomipheneModerateCommon

Birth defects and the letrozole pregnancy warning

The letrozole label states it can cause fetal harm and contraindicates use in pregnancy. Pooled fertility trials found no rise in birth defects against clomiphene, at very low certainty.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
The letrozole label cites postmarketing reports of miscarriage and birth defects after use during pregnancy, and malformations in rats and rabbits at doses below the human dose, while stating the data are insufficient to give a drug-associated risk. It puts the US background rate of major birth defects at 2% to 4% [2]. Across 20 fertility trials, birth defects did not differ between letrozole and clomiphene (RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 5.58, very low certainty) [16]. In 911 newborns from Canadian fertility centers, anomalies occurred in 2.4% after letrozole and 4.8% after clomiphene, major ones in 1.2% and 3.0%, and heart anomalies in 0.2% and 1.8% [17]. PPCOS II recorded four major anomalies on letrozole and one on clomiphene (P = 0.65) [5]. AMIGOS found no significant differences in anomalies between letrozole, clomiphene and gonadotropins [12]. The clomiphene label states human data do not suggest a rise above the background rate, while animal studies showed malformations, and it contraindicates use in pregnancy [1].
Population
6,679 patients in 20 trials [16]. 911 newborns [17]. 750 women [5]. 900 women [12].
Sources
[2], [16], [17], [5], [12], [1]
Caveats
The newborn study was retrospective [17]. In fertility use, letrozole is taken on cycle days 3 to 7, before ovulation [15], while the label warning concerns exposure during pregnancy [2]. Trials of a few hundred pregnancies cannot rule out a rise in a rare defect.
SNRIsModerateCommon

Sexual side effects

Shown to raise sexual side effects on venlafaxine and duloxetine, with abnormal ejaculation or orgasm in about 10% of men on venlafaxine against 0.5% on placebo.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In pooled venlafaxine extended release trials, men reported abnormal ejaculation or orgasm (9.9% vs 0.5% on placebo), impotence (5.3% vs 1.0%) and anorgasmia (3.6% vs 0.1%), women reported anorgasmia (2.0% vs 0.2%), and decreased libido occurred in 5.1% vs 1.6% overall [10]. In duloxetine depression and anxiety trials, erectile dysfunction occurred in 4% vs 1% and decreased libido in 3% vs 1% [18]. A meta-analysis that included studies asking about sexual function directly found venlafaxine and duloxetine among the drugs with more sexual dysfunction than placebo, with rates of 25.8% to 80.3% across those drugs [33]. In three desvenlafaxine trials using a sexual function scale, dysfunction rates were 54% at 50 mg, 47% at 100 mg and 49% on placebo, with no overall difference [34].
Population
1,440 men and 2,118 women on venlafaxine extended release [10]; adults in duloxetine trials [18]; antidepressant studies pooled by drug [33]; 1,562 adults with depression in 3 trials [34].
Sources
[10], [18], [33], [34]
Caveats
The band above is from label trials, which rely on spontaneous reports. Studies that asked directly found higher rates [33]. The desvenlafaxine analysis was post hoc [34].
SpironolactoneModerateCommon

Breast enlargement and breast pain in men

Shown to cause breast enlargement or breast pain in 10% of men on spironolactone against 1% on placebo in one heart failure trial.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In RALES, gynecomastia or breast pain was reported by 10% of men on spironolactone and 1% of men on placebo [1]. The label reports gynecomastia in about 9% of men at a mean dose of 26 mg a day, states that the risk rises with dose and that onset ranges from 1 to 2 months to over a year, and that it is usually reversible [3].
Population
Men among 1,663 people with severe heart failure [1].
Sources
[1], [3]
Caveats
One trial at a low dose. Rates at the higher doses used for other conditions were not sourced.
TopiramateModerateStudied in pregnancyCommon

Pregnancy: oral clefts and small babies (label warning)

The label warns that topiramate in pregnancy raised oral clefts, about 12.5 times the background rate in one registry, and small-for-age newborns, 19.7% against 5.4%.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In the North American registry, oral clefts occurred in 1.4% of infants exposed in the first trimester, against 0.3% with a comparison seizure drug and 0.11% with no exposure (RR 12.5, 95% CI 5.9 to 26.37 against an untreated background). Excluding clefts, major malformations occurred in 4.1%, 1.8% and 1.1%. A UK register found clefts in 3.2%, 16 times its background. Small-for-age newborns were 19.7% against 7.9% and 5.4%, and 25% against 9% in a Norwegian registry [3]. A Cochrane review found major malformations in 3.9% of exposed children, with a higher risk than in children of women without epilepsy (RR 4.07, 95% CI 1.64 to 10.14) but not than women with untreated epilepsy (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.57 to 3.27) [12]. A network meta-analysis found higher odds of major malformations than unexposed controls (OR 1.90, 95% CrI 1.17 to 2.97) [13].
Population
Infants in pregnancy registries [3]; 49 studies of seizure drugs in pregnancy [12]; 96 studies with 58,461 patients [13].
Sources
[3], [12], [13]
Caveats
Observational registries. The label notes metabolic acidosis in the mother or newborn may also affect the fetus [3].
WarfarinModerateCommon

Harm to the fetus in pregnancy

The label states that first trimester exposure caused a pattern of birth defects in about 5% of exposed babies. It lists pregnancy as a contraindication except with mechanical valves.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
The label states that warfarin crosses the placenta, that exposure in the first trimester caused a pattern of congenital malformations in about 5% of exposed offspring, and that brain and eye abnormalities have followed later exposure. It lists pregnancy as a contraindication except in women with mechanical heart valves at high risk of clots [11]. In pregnant women with mechanical valves, treatment with a vitamin K antagonist throughout was associated with maternal clot complications in 2.7%, live births in 64.5% and anticoagulant-related fetal or neonatal harm in 2.0%, against 8.7%, 92.0% and 0% with low molecular weight heparin. Fetal anomalies occurred in 2.3% at first trimester warfarin doses of 5 mg a day or less and 12.4% at higher doses [26].
Population
Reports summarized in labeling [11]; 46 articles on pregnant women with mechanical heart valves [26].
Sources
[11], [26]
Caveats
The label notes its 5% figure did not come from controlled studies. The included studies had moderate or high risk of bias [26].
DHEALimitedStudied in womenCommon

Vaginal discharge with intravaginal DHEA

One trial found about 6% of postmenopausal women using intravaginal DHEA reported vaginal discharge.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
About 6% of women reported vaginal discharge, which the authors attribute to the vehicle melting at body temperature [7].
Population
482 postmenopausal women over 12 weeks [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
One developer-run trial.
Endometriosis surgeryLimitedStudied in womenCommon

Complications in trials of excision or ablation for milder disease

Limited evidence: trials of excision or ablation for mild disease reported few complications, 3 minor ones among 172 women in the largest.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Four minor complications were reported in the fertility trial, an intestinal bruise, a slight tear of a tube's outer layer, a difficult abdominal inflation and a vascular injury, three in the surgery group and one in the diagnostic group [8]. The laser trial reported no operative complications [2]. The Cochrane review found adverse events poorly reported, with no conversions to open surgery in one trial of 341 women [4].
Population
341 women [8]. 63 women [2]. 14 trials [4].
Sources
[8], [2], [4]
Caveats
Trials were small and most did not look for adverse events, so rare serious complications cannot be ruled out [4].
Hormonal birth controlModerateUncommon

Hormonal IUD: perforation, expulsion and ectopic pregnancy

The label reports uterine perforation in under 0.1% in trials, and about half of the rare pregnancies with Mirena in place are ectopic.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
Perforation occurred in under 0.1% in trials, which excluded breastfeeding women. In a cohort of 326,658 insertions, perforation was 1.32 per 1,000 insertions with no recent delivery and up to 11.78 per 1,000 between 4 days and 6 weeks after birth. Expulsion may go unnoticed. Ectopic pregnancy occurred at about 0.1% per year in trials, and about half of pregnancies with Mirena in place are likely ectopic [3].
Population
Mirena trial participants and a US cohort of 326,658 insertions [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
Rates depend on timing after childbirth and breastfeeding [3].
Letrozole and clomipheneModerateStudied in womenUncommon

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Pooled PCOS trials found ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in 0.5% of women on letrozole and 0.5% on clomiphene. The clomiphene label warns it can progress rapidly and notes deaths.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in 0.5% of women in both arms (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, 10 trials, 1,848 women) [3]. Three trials of clomiphene against tamoxifen reported no cases in either group [7]. The label states the syndrome may progress within 24 hours to several days, that severe cases can include fluid in the abdomen and chest, kidney failure and blood clots, and that death from hypovolemic shock, hemoconcentration or thromboembolism has occurred [1].
Population
1,848 women with PCOS in 10 trials [3]. Women in 3 trials [7]. Label clinical and postmarketing reports [1].
Sources
[3], [7], [1]
Caveats
The pooled trials were not large enough to measure rare severe cases precisely.
OndansetronModerateStudied in pregnancyUncommon

Birth defects after use in pregnancy

Mixed results: one large cohort and a meta-analysis linked first-trimester use to a small rise in oral clefts, about 3 more per 10,000 births, with no rise in overall malformations.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
Among 88,467 pregnancies exposed in the first trimester, oral clefts occurred in 14.0 per 10,000 births against 11.1 unexposed (adjusted RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.48, about 2.7 more per 10,000). Cardiac malformations (RR 0.99) and all malformations (RR 1.01) did not rise [9]. A meta-analysis of 12 studies found small rises in ventricular septal defects (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.23) and oral clefts (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.49), and none in major malformations overall [10]. The label describes the published findings as inconsistent, with cardiac defect relative risks from 0.97 to 1.62 and conflicting results for cleft palate [3].
Population
1,816,414 pregnancies in US Medicaid data [9]; 12 cohort and case-control studies [10].
Sources
[9], [10], [3]
Caveats
Observational. The label notes uncertainty over whether prescriptions were taken, and other unadjusted confounders [3].
SNRIsModerateUncommon

Pregnancy and newborns

Mixed results: major birth defects were not clearly raised with venlafaxine or duloxetine, while newborn lung pressure problems and bleeding after delivery were linked to exposure.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
In 8 cohort studies, first-trimester venlafaxine exposure had a relative risk for major malformations of 1.12 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.35) and duloxetine 0.80 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.29) [40]. In a US cohort, duloxetine had a relative risk of 1.11 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.33) for malformations overall, 1.29 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.68) for cardiovascular malformations, 1.19 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.37) for preterm birth with late exposure and 1.53 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.18) for postpartum hemorrhage [36]. Among pregnancies exposed to an SSRI or SNRI, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn occurred in 2.9 per 1,000 live births (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.54) [41].
Population
3,186 infants exposed to venlafaxine and 668 to duloxetine [40]; cohorts of 1.3 to 4.1 million pregnancies with about 2,500 to 3,000 early duloxetine exposures [36]; 156,978 exposed pregnancies in 11 studies [41].
Sources
[40], [36], [41]
Caveats
Observational. The duloxetine data are small, and [41] did not separate SNRIs from SSRIs. The band above is the newborn pulmonary hypertension rate.
SSRIsModerateUncommon

Pregnancy and newborns

Linked to persistent pulmonary hypertension in about 2.9 per 1,000 exposed newborns, and to a small rise in birth defects that disappeared among women with a psychiatric diagnosis.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
Among 156,978 pregnancies exposed to an SSRI or SNRI, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn occurred in 2.9 per 1,000 live births (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.54), a number needed to harm of 1,000 [48]. The label gives a background rate of 1 to 2 per 1,000 [24]. Across 29 cohort studies, first-trimester SSRI use was associated with major congenital anomalies (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19) and congenital heart defects (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.37). Neither association was significant when the comparison was limited to women with a psychiatric diagnosis (RR 1.04 and 1.06) [49]. The paroxetine label states that first-trimester exposure is associated with a less than 2-fold increase in cardiovascular malformations [28]. The labels also describe newborns exposed late in pregnancy who needed prolonged hospital stays, breathing support and tube feeding, and a less than 2-fold increase in postpartum hemorrhage with use in the month before delivery [24].
Population
11 studies of prenatal exposure [48]; 9,085,954 births in 29 cohort studies [49].
Sources
[48], [24], [49], [28]
Caveats
Observational, with high heterogeneity for the pulmonary hypertension estimate (I² 72%) [48]. The label also cites a study in which women who stopped antidepressants in pregnancy relapsed more often than women who continued [24].
Uterine fibroid proceduresModerateStudied in pregnancyUncommon

Uterine rupture in a later pregnancy after myomectomy

Linked to uterine rupture in about 0.3% to 0.9% of later pregnancies after myomectomy, more often when the uterine cavity had been entered during surgery.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
Across 13,381 pregnancies after myomectomy, uterine rupture occurred in 0.30% (40 cases, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.41). It occurred in 6.82% (3 of 44) when the cavity had been entered and 1.19% (4 of 336) when it had not (OR 6.07). Laparoscopic, open or robotic surgery did not change the risk significantly [18]. An earlier review found rupture in 0.93% of 756 viable deliveries, 0.47% with labor and 1.52% before labor, 5 of 7 before 36 weeks [19].
Population
13,381 pregnancies in 31 studies from 2013 to 2023 [18]; 1,034 pregnancies and 756 deliveries in 11 studies [19].
Sources
[18], [19]
Caveats
Observational studies, with too little data to give the risk during a trial of labor [18].
BuspironeLimitedUncommon

Sexual side effects

The label lists decreased or increased libido in between 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 people, and delayed ejaculation and impotence in fewer than 1 in 1,000.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
In premarketing studies, decreased or increased libido was classed as infrequent, meaning 1 in 100 to 1 in 1,000 patients, and delayed ejaculation and impotence as rare, meaning fewer than 1 in 1,000. No placebo rates are given [4].
Population
About 3,000 subjects who took multiple doses in premarketing studies [4].
Sources
[4]
Caveats
Uncontrolled counts, so the share caused by the drug is unknown.
Calcium channel blockersLimitedStudied in womenUncommon

Breast cancer

Mixed results: one case-control study linked 10 or more years of use to breast cancer, and a pooled analysis and a larger cohort found no link.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
In a case-control study, current use for 10 or more years was associated with ductal (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.9) and lobular (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.3) breast cancer, with no clear difference between subgroups of the class [23]. A meta-analysis of 11 observational studies found no significant association (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.33) [24]. In a cohort of 273,152 women, breast cancer occurred at 2.9 per 1,000 a year, and use of calcium channel blockers was not associated with it against other blood pressure drugs (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.03), with no trend by duration [25].
Population
1,907 women aged 55 to 74 with breast cancer and 856 controls [23]; 11 observational studies [24]; 273,152 women newly treated with blood pressure drugs [25].
Sources
[23], [24], [25]
Caveats
All observational. The rate shown is for the whole cohort, whichever drug was used [25].
GnRH drugs for fibroidsLimitedUncommon

Fibroid prolapse or expulsion

Case reports: on Myfembree, one woman had a fibroid expelled and one had a fibroid prolapse, each 0.4% of those treated, in the fibroid trials.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
Serious reactions on Myfembree included one uterine myoma expulsion with heavy bleeding and one fibroid prolapse, each 0.4% of 254 women. The label advises women with submucosal fibroids of this possibility [2].
Population
254 women on Myfembree in LIBERTY 1 and 2 [2].
Sources
[2]
Caveats
Single events.
GnRH drugs for fibroidsLimitedUncommon

Breast cancer cases on Oriahnn

Case reports: two breast cancers were diagnosed in 453 women on Oriahnn, 0.4%, and none on placebo. The label contraindicates use with a history of breast cancer.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
Two of 453 women on Oriahnn (0.4%) were diagnosed with breast cancer during the trials, one after 34 days of extension treatment, and none on placebo [6].
Population
453 women on Oriahnn in 3 trials [6].
Sources
[6]
Caveats
Two cases cannot show cause. Short trials.
H2 blockersLimitedUncommon

Breast growth and impotence (cimetidine)

The cimetidine label reports breast growth in men in 0.3% to 1% of patients treated a month or longer, and about 4% at the high doses used for hypersecretory conditions.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
Gynecomastia occurred in about 4% of patients treated for pathological hypersecretory states and 0.3% to 1% of others. Reversible impotence was reported in patients with hypersecretory disorders on high doses for at least 12 months, while in large surveillance studies at regular doses it did not exceed the general population rate [14].
Population
Patients in clinical studies and surveillance summarized in labeling [14].
Sources
[14]
Caveats
The label gives no placebo rate.
Uterine fibroid proceduresLimitedUncommon

Spreading hidden cancer with power morcellation

FDA states about 1 in 225 to 1 in 580 women having fibroid surgery may have a hidden uterine sarcoma, which laparoscopic power morcellation can spread.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
The FDA estimates a hidden uterine sarcoma in about 1 in 225 to 1 in 580 women having surgery for fibroids, and a leiomyosarcoma in about 1 in 495 to 1 in 1,100. Before 2014, the clinical community estimated as few as 1 in 10,000. Studies show women whose hidden sarcoma was morcellated had lower disease-free survival than women treated with manual morcellation or none. No reliable method predicts which women with fibroids have a sarcoma [1]. The risk rises with age, particularly over 50. The FDA advises against power morcellators in women after menopause or over 50, or who can have tissue removed whole through the vagina or a mini-laparotomy, and advises contained morcellation only. Uncontained morcellation has also spread benign tissue, such as parasitic myomas, sometimes needing more surgery [2].
Population
Published literature summarized by the FDA [1][2].
Sources
[1], [2]
Caveats
The FDA notes the survival studies have limitations [1]. A containment system cannot prevent spread from handling tissue before it is bagged, or cancer that has already spread [2].
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in womenRare

Breast cancer

Linked to about 20% higher breast cancer risk in current and recent users, 1 extra case per 7,690 women a year, similar for progestin-only methods including the hormonal IUD.

The numbers and sources
How common
Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
Effect
Current or recent hormonal contraception raised breast cancer risk against never use (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.26), from 1.09 with under 1 year to 1.38 with over 10 years. The levonorgestrel IUD carried 1.21. The absolute increase was 13 per 100,000 person-years [18]. In a UK study and meta-analysis, risks were similar for combined pills (OR 1.23), progestin-only pills (RR 1.29), implants (RR 1.28) and IUDs (RR 1.21), with a 15-year excess of 8 per 100,000 users aged 16 to 20 and 265 per 100,000 aged 35 to 39 [19].
Population
1.8 million Danish women followed 10.9 years on average [18]; 9,498 cases and 18,171 controls, plus 12 earlier studies [19].
Sources
[18], [19]
Caveats
Observational. Risk stayed raised after 5 or more years of use [18].
Alpha-blockersLimitedStudied in menRare

Priapism

The label warns tamsulosin, like other alpha-1 blockers, has rarely been linked to priapism, probably in fewer than 1 in 50,000 patients.

The numbers and sources
How common
Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
Effect
The tamsulosin label puts priapism at probably less than 1 in 50,000 patients and states it can lead to permanent impotence if not treated [4]. One case was reported on silodosin in its 12-week trials [5].
Population
Postmarketing reports [4]; 466 men on silodosin [5].
Sources
[4], [5]
Caveats
Based on reports, not a trial rate.
Endometriosis surgeryStrongStudied in womenHow often is not known

Lower anti-Mullerian hormone after endometrioma surgery

Shown to lower anti-Mullerian hormone, a marker of egg supply, after endometrioma surgery in women, by about 35% to 54% in pooled studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
AMH fell by 1.77 ng/mL at 1 to 6 weeks, 1.17 ng/mL at 2 to 6 months and 2.13 ng/mL at 9 to 18 months after cystectomy, mean falls of 44.4%, 35.1% and 54.2%. Antral follicle counts did not change significantly [15]. A second review found falls of 1.39, 1.13 and 2.12 ng/mL over the same periods, with no difference between removing a cyst from one ovary or both [16].
Population
650 women in 14 prospective studies [15]. Women in 30 studies [16].
Sources
[15], [16]
Caveats
These are before-and-after measures in the same women, and heterogeneity was high (I² 92% to 94%) [15]. A lower AMH is not the same as lower fertility, which these reviews did not measure.
Menopausal hormone therapyStrongStudied in womenHow often is not known

Breast cancer

Shown to raise breast cancer with estrogen plus progestin. Results for estrogen alone disagreed, with lower risk in trials and higher risk in observational studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In the WHI trial, estrogen plus progestin raised invasive breast cancer (206 vs 155 cases, HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.53), and some excess persisted after stopping (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.48). Estrogen alone did not raise it (104 vs 135 cases, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.02) [5]. In pooled prospective studies, every type except vaginal estrogen was associated with higher risk. For current use in years 1 to 4, the RR was 1.60 (95% CI 1.52 to 1.69) for estrogen plus progestogen and 1.17 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.26) for estrogen alone. In years 5 to 14 the RRs were 2.08 (95% CI 2.02 to 2.15) and 1.33 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.37) [13]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 34 studies found the risk confined to estrogen plus progestin (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.64), with no overall association for estrogen alone (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.10). In its randomized trials, estrogen alone was linked to lower risk (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.87) [14].
Population
16,608 and 10,739 women in the two WHI trials [5]; 108,647 postmenopausal women with breast cancer in worldwide prospective studies [13]; 34 studies [14].
Sources
[5], [13], [14]
Caveats
The trial and observational results disagree for estrogen alone. The 2026 meta-analysis found high heterogeneity overall (I² 92.4%) and marked differences by region [14]. The pooled studies estimate that 5 years of use from age 50 adds about 1 case per 50 users of estrogen plus daily progestogen and 1 per 200 users of estrogen alone, if the associations are causal [13].
AlcoholModerateStudied in womenHow often is not known

Fibroids

Mixed results: a 2026 pooled analysis found no overall link between drinking and fibroids, while an earlier one linked current drinking to 33% higher odds.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Across 13 studies (135,370 women, 9,944 with fibroids), ever drinking was not linked to fibroids against never drinking (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.26), and across 9 studies (3,375,571 women) neither was current drinking (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.32). Odds were higher in studies from China (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.29 to 9.43) and in studies that confirmed fibroids clinically or surgically (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.39) [27]. An earlier review found ever drinking not linked (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.34) and current drinking linked to higher odds (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.76), from 2 studies [28].
Population
Women in 13 studies for ever drinking and 9 for current drinking [27]; 5 studies, 2 of them for current drinking [28].
Sources
[27], [28]
Caveats
Observational. The authors describe the studies as heterogeneous and the evidence as limited [27]. Both reviews come from the same group, and the later one includes the earlier studies. Drinkers differ from nondrinkers in other habits, so confounding is possible.
Antibiotics (common outpatient)ModerateHow often is not known

Interaction with birth control pills

Mixed results: the amoxicillin label says it may reduce birth control pill efficacy, while a systematic review found no evidence that non-rifamycin antibiotics reduce hormonal contraception.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Two studies found no difference in pregnancy rates in women taking oral contraceptives with and without non-rifamycin antibiotics. No study found changes in ovulation suppression or breakthrough bleeding, and no progestin level fell [29]. The amoxicillin label states amoxicillin may reduce the efficacy of oral contraceptives [22].
Population
29 studies of pills, emergency contraception and the vaginal ring [29]; label statement [22].
Sources
[29], [22]
Caveats
Data were limited for some antibiotic classes [29]. Rifampin, not on this page, does lower contraceptive hormone levels.
Beta-blockersModerateHow often is not known

Sexual dysfunction

Shown to raise reported sexual dysfunction slightly, by 5 per 1,000 people a year, or one extra report for every 199 people treated.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Across placebo-controlled trials, beta-blockers were associated with 5 more reports of sexual dysfunction per 1,000 people a year (95% CI 2 to 8), one extra report for every 199 people treated for a year. The risk did not differ by lipid solubility of the drug [28].
Population
More than 35,000 people in 15 trials in heart attack, heart failure or hypertension [28].
Sources
[28]
Caveats
The abstract gives the excess over placebo, not the rate in each group, so no band can be read from it.
CBDModerateHow often is not known

FDA position

FDA states it has not found adequate evidence on how much CBD can be consumed, and for how long, before causing harm, naming liver harm and drug interactions.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
On January 26, 2023, FDA said it was not apparent how CBD products could meet safety standards for dietary supplements or food additives, and that it had not found adequate evidence to determine how much CBD can be consumed, and for how long, before causing harm. It named potential harm to the liver, interactions with certain medications, possible harm to the male reproductive system, and concern for children and those who are pregnant [20].
Population
US consumers [20].
Sources
[20]
Caveats
The FDA-run 2025 trial found no change in testosterone, inhibin B or thyroid hormones after 28 days [11].
CoffeeModerateStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Low birth weight, preterm birth and pregnancy loss

Linked to more low birth weight, preterm birth and pregnancy loss at high intake during pregnancy, in pooled observational studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
High against low or no coffee during pregnancy was linked to low birth weight (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.67), preterm birth in the first (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.49) and second trimester (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.22), and pregnancy loss (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.99) [2]. Across 8 studies of coffee, pregnancy loss was more common in drinkers (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.21), rising 8% per 2 extra cups a day [22].
Population
Meta-analyses of pregnant women [2]. 26 case-control and cohort studies in pregnancy, 8 of them on coffee [22].
Sources
[2], [22]
Caveats
Observational, and the abstracts do not give the intake that counted as high. The umbrella review found these links remained after adjustment for smoking, unlike most other harmful links [2].
DHEAModerateStudied in womenHow often is not known

Acne and other androgenic effects in women

Shown to raise androgenic side effects, mainly acne, about 3.8 times the odds on placebo in menopausal women.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
DHEA raised the odds of androgenic side effects, mainly acne, with an OR of 3.77 (95% CI 1.36 to 10.4). No associations were found with other adverse effects [5].
Population
376 menopausal women in 5 trials [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
Evidence was rated moderate quality [5].
FolateModerateHow often is not known

Gestational diabetes with high or long use

Linked to higher odds of gestational diabetes at 800 µg a day or more, or with use beyond 3 to 6 months, in observational studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
A 2025 systematic review of 12 observational studies found that 800 µg a day or more, or use beyond 3 to 6 months, may be associated with higher odds of gestational diabetes, especially when started before conception. About 400 µg a day appeared neutral or protective in some populations. High folate with low B12 was linked to higher risk [24]. A 2026 systematic review linked excess folic acid intake and high blood folate in pregnancy with gestational diabetes, large-for-gestational-age infants and higher birth weight [18].
Population
Pregnant women in cohort and case-control studies [24][18].
Sources
[24], [18]
Caveats
Observational studies, no pooled estimate. The first review calls the evidence inconclusive [24].
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in womenHow often is not known

Lower testosterone and higher SHBG

Shown to lower total testosterone and cut free testosterone by about 61% in healthy women on combined pills, while SHBG rose about 99 nmol/L.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Total testosterone fell (MD -0.49 nmol/L, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.42), free testosterone fell 61% (relative level 0.39), and SHBG rose (MD 99.08 nmol/L, 95% CI 86.43 to 111.73). Ethinyl estradiol dose and progestin type did not change the testosterone fall, but pills with second-generation progestins or 20 to 25 µg ethinyl estradiol raised SHBG less [7].
Population
1,495 healthy women aged 18 to 40 in 42 studies [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
Half the studies were non-comparative. The clinical effects of lower androgens remain unclear [7].
Hormonal birth controlModerateHow often is not known

Drugs that weaken the pill

The label warns enzyme-inducing drugs such as rifampin, carbamazepine and St. John's wort may weaken combined pills, while common antibiotics showed no effect on pregnancy rates or hormone levels.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Drugs or herbal products that induce CYP3A4, including phenytoin, barbiturates, carbamazepine, bosentan, felbamate, griseofulvin, oxcarbazepine, rifampin, topiramate and St. John's wort, may decrease effectiveness or cause breakthrough bleeding [2]. For non-rifamycin antibiotics, two studies found no difference in pregnancy rates, and no study found changes in ovulation suppression or progestin levels [24].
Population
Label statement [2]; 29 studies [24].
Sources
[2], [24]
Caveats
Data were limited for some antibiotic classes [24].
Light at nightModerateStudied in womenHow often is not known

Light at night linked to breast cancer

Linked to 8% to 10% more breast cancer in women with higher indoor or outdoor light at night in one meta-analysis. Data on other cancers were too few.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Higher indoor light at night (summary RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15) and outdoor light at night (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.15) were linked to breast cancer. Removing one low-quality study did not change the result [16].
Population
19 breast cancer studies within 26 case-control and cohort studies of adults [16].
Sources
[16]
Caveats
Observational, and half the studies were case-control, where recall of past light exposure can be biased. Night shift work, a separate exposure, has its own page.
Menopausal hormone therapyModerateStudied in womenHow often is not known

Breast tenderness and vaginal bleeding

Shown to raise breast pain and vaginal spotting or bleeding against control in postmenopausal women.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In a network meta-analysis, hormone therapy alone was associated with higher risks of breast pain and vaginal spotting or bleeding than control [6].
Population
2,861 postmenopausal women in 16 RCTs [6].
Sources
[6]
Caveats
The abstract does not give the rates [6].
NSAIDsModerateHow often is not known

Use in later pregnancy

The label warns use from about 20 weeks of pregnancy may cause fetal kidney problems, and from 30 weeks early closure of the ductus arteriosus.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The prescription ibuprofen label states that use at about 20 weeks of pregnancy or later may cause fetal kidney problems leading to low amniotic fluid, and that from about 30 weeks NSAIDs raise the risk of premature closure of the fetal ductus arteriosus [12]. In a meta-analysis of observational studies, NSAID use in pregnancy was associated with kidney disease in the child (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.62), including in the second trimester (OR 1.17) and third trimester (OR 1.10) [21].
Population
Postmarketing reports and studies summarized in the label [12]; 7 studies with 4,159,617 participants [21].
Sources
[12], [21]
Caveats
The label statement is not a trial rate. The authors of [21] state their observational data cannot settle whether the link is causal.
SARMsGrey marketModerateHow often is not known

Lower testosterone and HDL cholesterol

Shown to lower testosterone and HDL cholesterol in healthy men, more at higher doses. Levels returned to baseline after stopping.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
LGD-4033 lowered total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides in a dose-dependent way. FSH and free testosterone fell at the highest dose. Levels returned to baseline after stopping [1]. The 2026 review reports suppression of testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin and HDL cholesterol across randomized trials, with reversible rises in liver enzymes for some compounds [4].
Population
76 healthy young men over 21 days and 5 weeks of follow-up [1]; trials summarized in a review [4].
Sources
[1], [4]
Caveats
Trial doses were lower and shorter than the stacked, unmonitored use the review describes [4].
Shift workModerateHow often is not known

Cancer

Mixed results: IARC classes night shift work as probably carcinogenic, mainly from case-control and animal studies, while ten prospective cohorts found no rise in breast cancer.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
IARC found limited evidence in humans, with positive associations between night shift work and cancers of the breast, prostate, colon and rectum in the largest case-control studies but inconsistent results in cohort studies. It found sufficient evidence in animals for altered light-dark schedules, and classed night shift work as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A) [12]. In 10 prospective studies, any night shift work had a breast cancer RR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.03), and 20 or more years an RR of 1.01 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.10) [13].
Population
Studies of cancer in exposed people and lifetime studies in mice, reviewed in 2019 [12]. 1.4 million women in 10 prospective studies, 4,660 breast cancers in night shift workers [13].
Sources
[12], [13]
Caveats
IARC gave case-control studies more weight because they measured shift work in more detail [12]. Group 2A describes the strength of evidence that a hazard exists, not the size of any risk.
St. John's WortModerateStudied in womenHow often is not known

Lower contraceptive levels, breakthrough bleeding and ovulation

Shown to lower birth control pill levels and raise breakthrough bleeding in healthy women, with signs of probable ovulation in one study. Pregnancies were not measured.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In 12 women on a combined pill, 300 mg three times a day raised norethindrone clearance from 8.2 to 9.5 L/h and halved ethinyl estradiol half-life, from 23.4 to 12.2 hours. Breakthrough bleeding rose from 2 of 12 women to 7 of 12 [6]. In 16 women on a low-dose pill, contraceptive exposure fell 13% to 15%, with more breakthrough bleeding and evidence of follicle growth and probable ovulation [7].
Population
28 healthy premenopausal women in two studies [6][7].
Sources
[6], [7]
Caveats
Small pharmacokinetic studies. Neither measured pregnancies.
SulfonylureasModerateStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Pregnancy and newborn low blood sugar

Linked to about twice the newborn low blood sugar of insulin when glyburide was used in gestational diabetes. Labels report prolonged low blood sugar in exposed newborns.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Against insulin in gestational diabetes, glibenclamide was associated with more neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.20) and macrosomia (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.35 to 5.08) [12]. The glyburide label reports prolonged severe hypoglycemia lasting 4 to 10 days in newborns whose mothers were taking a sulfonylurea at delivery [14]. The glimepiride label states that published studies and postmarketing experience have not identified drug-associated risks of major birth defects or miscarriage, and that sulfonylureas cross the placenta [3].
Population
2,509 women with gestational diabetes [12]; reports summarized in labeling [14][3].
Sources
[12], [14], [3]
Caveats
The meta-analysis abstract gives risk ratios, not the share of newborns affected.
Tretinoin and topical retinoidsModerateStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Pregnancy

Mixed results: a meta-analysis found no rise in birth defects after topical retinoids in early pregnancy, while the tazarotene label lists pregnancy as a contraindication.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Across studies of 654 women exposed to topical retinoids in the first trimester and 1,375 unexposed, major congenital malformations (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.29) and miscarriage (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.63) did not differ significantly. The authors state the study had too little power to justify use in pregnancy [16]. The tazarotene label calls it teratogenic and contraindicated in pregnancy, and asks for a negative pregnancy test within 2 weeks before starting. Of 9 women exposed to tazarotene in trials, 8 delivered apparently healthy babies [3]. The Retin-A label reports 30 birth defect cases over two decades, five of them holoprosencephaly, with no causal link established [13].
Population
654 exposed and 1,375 unexposed pregnant women [16]; trial participants and spontaneous reports [3][13].
Sources
[16], [3], [13]
Caveats
Small numbers. Case reports have no denominator [13].
TriptansModerateStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

Mixed results: pooled studies found no more birth defects or prematurity, and more miscarriage than in healthy women but not than in women with untreated migraine.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Against women with migraine who took no triptan, exposure was not associated with major congenital malformations (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.16), prematurity (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.30) or spontaneous abortion (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.79). Against healthy controls, malformations (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.44) and prematurity did not differ and spontaneous abortion was more frequent (OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.24 to 5.59). Women with migraine who took no triptan had more malformations than healthy controls (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.80) [18]. In the manufacturer's pregnancy registry cited on the label, major birth defects followed 4.2% of first-trimester exposures to sumatriptan (20 of 478), and the label states that the data have not detected an increased frequency of birth defects [11].
Population
4,208 infants of women who used triptans in pregnancy and 1,466,994 children of women who did not, in 6 studies [18]; 626 infants and fetuses in the registry [11].
Sources
[18], [11]
Caveats
Observational. Migraine itself was associated with adverse outcomes, which makes the choice of comparison group decisive [18].
Ulipristal acetateModerateHow often is not known

Benign changes in the uterine lining

Shown to cause benign changes in the uterine lining more often than placebo or leuprolide. In one trial the changes had resolved 6 months after treatment ended.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
SPRM-associated endometrial changes were more common than on placebo (OR 15.12, 95% CI 6.45 to 35.47, 5 RCTs, 405 women) and than on leuprolide (OR 10.45, 95% CI 5.38 to 20.33). The reviewers describe these changes as benign, not cancer and not precancerous [3]. In the placebo-controlled trial, the changes had resolved by 6 months after the end of treatment [1].
Population
Women with fibroids in randomized trials [1][3].
Sources
[3], [1]
Caveats
Low-quality evidence for the comparison with placebo, and the trials ran for 3 months [3].
ACE inhibitorsLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Boxed warning: harm to the fetus

FDA states that drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system can cause injury and death to the developing fetus.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The boxed warning on the lisinopril label states that drugs acting directly on the renin-angiotensin system can cause injury and death to the developing fetus. The label says use in the second and third trimesters reduces fetal kidney function and raises fetal and newborn illness and death, with low amniotic fluid, underdeveloped lungs, skull underdevelopment and kidney failure among the effects described [3]. In a review of published case reports, 52% of 118 newborns exposed to ACE inhibitors before birth had no complications. The others had kidney failure, low amniotic fluid, low blood pressure, growth restriction or death [20]. In a cohort of 29,507 infants, exposure in the first trimester alone was associated with more major congenital malformations than no exposure to blood pressure drugs (RR 2.71, 95% CI 1.72 to 4.27) [21].
Population
118 published cases of exposure before birth [20]; 209 infants exposed in the first trimester alone among 29,507 infants without maternal diabetes [21].
Sources
[3], [20], [21]
Caveats
Case reports favor poor outcomes and give no rate [20]. The cohort finding is observational, from one US state [21].
AcetaminophenLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

Mixed results: cohort studies linked use in pregnancy to slightly more autism and ADHD in children, and a sibling comparison in the same cohort found no link.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In a Swedish cohort, risk at age 10 without and with exposure in pregnancy was 1.33% against 1.53% for autism, 2.46% against 2.87% for ADHD and 0.70% against 0.82% for intellectual disability. Without sibling control, ever-use was associated with autism (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.08) and ADHD (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.10). Comparing full siblings, there was no association with autism (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.04), ADHD (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.02) or intellectual disability (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10), and no dose response [26]. In September 2025 FDA began a label change to reflect evidence suggesting that use in pregnancy may be associated with a higher risk of conditions such as autism and ADHD. FDA stated that a causal relationship has not been established, that contrary studies exist, and that acetaminophen is the only over-the-counter drug approved to treat fever in pregnancy [27]. The over-the-counter label directs pregnant or breastfeeding users to ask a health professional before use [19].
Population
2,480,797 children born in Sweden from 1995 to 2019, of whom 185,909 (7.49%) were exposed during pregnancy [26].
Sources
[26], [27], [19]
Caveats
Observational. The FDA statement names the Nurses' Health Study II and the Boston Birth Cohort among studies that found an association, and those were not read for this page [27].
ADHD stimulantsLimitedHow often is not known

Priapism with methylphenidate

The label warns of prolonged and painful erections, sometimes needing surgery, in men and boys taking methylphenidate. It gives no rate.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The methylphenidate label states that priapism was not reported at the start of treatment but after some time, often following a dose increase, and also during drug holidays or after stopping [21].
Population
Reports in adult and pediatric male patients summarized in labeling [21].
Sources
[21]
Caveats
The evidence is for methylphenidate. Reports with no denominator.
AllopurinolLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

The label states that allopurinol may cause fetal harm based on animal findings, with 2 major malformations among about 50 published pregnancies.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states that, based on findings in animals, allopurinol may cause fetal harm, and that it crosses the placenta. Among about 50 pregnancies in the published literature, 2 infants with major congenital malformations were reported, which the label says shows no clear pattern or increase [5].
Population
About 50 published pregnancies with allopurinol exposure [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
Published case reports, with no comparison group.
AmitriptylineLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Pregnancy

Case reports: the label notes a few reports of nervous system effects, limb deformities or developmental delay in infants exposed in pregnancy, with no causal link established.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Amitriptyline crosses the placenta. The label reports a few cases of central nervous system effects, limb deformities or developmental delay in infants whose mothers took it, states that a causal relationship has not been established, and that there are no adequate controlled studies in pregnant women. It was teratogenic in mice and hamsters at 9 to 33 times the maximum human dose [13].
Population
Case reports and animal studies described in the label [13].
Sources
[13]
Caveats
Case reports, with no denominator.
Antiplatelets: clopidogrel and low-dose aspirinLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Pregnancy

The aspirin label warns that aspirin late in pregnancy can harm the fetus. Trials of low-dose aspirin found slightly more bleeding after birth.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The prescription aspirin label states that maternal aspirin use in later pregnancy may cause low birth weight, intracranial hemorrhage in premature infants, stillbirth and neonatal death, and that NSAIDs may cause premature closure of the fetal ductus arteriosus in the third trimester [23]. In trials of low-dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage above 500 mL was probably slightly more frequent (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12), while fetal or neonatal death was less frequent (RR 0.85) [19]. The clopidogrel label states that published cases and postmarketing surveillance have not identified drug-associated risks of major birth defects or miscarriage [22].
Population
Statements in labeling [23][22]; 40,249 women in 77 trials [19].
Sources
[23], [19], [22]
Caveats
The label warning covers aspirin at all doses, and the trials used low doses. The sources do not give the share of pregnancies affected.
ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers)LimitedHow often is not known

Boxed warning: harm to the fetus

FDA states that drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system can cause injury and death to the developing fetus.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The losartan label states that use of drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system in the second and third trimesters reduces fetal kidney function and raises fetal and newborn illness and death, with low amniotic fluid, underdeveloped lungs, skull underdevelopment and kidney failure among the effects described [10]. In a review of published case reports, 13% of 68 newborns exposed to ARBs before birth had no complications, against 52% of those exposed to ACE inhibitors. Complications included kidney failure, low amniotic fluid, death, low blood pressure and growth restriction [23].
Population
68 published cases of exposure to ARBs before birth, in 35 reports [23].
Sources
[10], [23]
Caveats
Case reports favor poor outcomes and give no rate [23].
AshwagandhaLimitedHow often is not known

Pregnancy and reproductive toxicity

Limited evidence: animal studies showed no clear reproductive toxicity, and no controlled human pregnancy study exists. Germany's BfR advises pregnant women not to take it.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
A 2025 systematic and ethnobotanical review traced claims of abortifacient effects to historical reports with citation distortion and no primary-source validation. Animal studies showed no significant reproductive toxicity at doses relevant to human use, and the review judged evidence of teratogenic or abortifacient activity inconclusive [20].
Population
Animal toxicology studies, human clinical studies and historical texts [20].
Sources
[20]
Caveats
The review describes no controlled study of pregnancy outcomes in humans. The BfR advised pregnant and breastfeeding women not to take ashwagandha preparations [19].
Beta-blockersLimitedHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

Mixed results: pooled observational studies found no rise in birth defects overall with first-trimester use, and higher odds of heart defects and cleft lip or palate.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In 13 observational studies, first-trimester use of oral beta-blockers showed no increased odds of all or major congenital anomalies. Organ-specific analyses found higher odds of cardiovascular defects (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.42, 4 studies), cleft lip or palate (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.79 to 5.43, 2 studies) and neural tube defects (OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.19 to 10.67, 2 studies) [37]. The metoprolol label states that published observational studies have not demonstrated a drug-associated risk of major birth defects or miscarriage, and that reports of growth restriction, preterm birth and perinatal death with beta-blocker use are inconsistent [24].
Population
13 population-based case-control or cohort studies [37].
Sources
[37], [24]
Caveats
The authors called causality difficult to interpret, given few and heterogeneous studies and possible bias [37].
Calcium channel blockersLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

The label states that data on amlodipine in pregnancy are too limited to estimate a risk of birth defects or miscarriage.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The amlodipine label states that the limited post-marketing data on use in pregnant women are not sufficient to inform a drug-associated risk for major birth defects and miscarriage [8]. In trials of nifedipine to delay preterm labor, one placebo-controlled trial of 89 women found more maternal adverse effects on the drug (RR 49.89, 95% CI 3.13 to 795.02), and across trials there were fewer maternal adverse effects than with betamimetics (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.53) [14].
Population
Post-marketing reports described in the label [8]; women in preterm labor in 38 trials [14].
Sources
[8], [14]
Caveats
No rate of birth defects is available from either source.
CreatineLimitedStudied in menHow often is not known

Hair loss and DHT

Limited evidence: DHT rose in one small study, and a 12-week trial found no change in DHT or hair.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In 20 male rugby players, DHT rose 56% after 7 days of loading and stayed 40% above baseline after 14 more days; testosterone did not change. Hair was not measured [15]. A 12-week RCT in 38 resistance-trained men on 5 g a day found no group differences in DHT, DHT to testosterone ratio, hair density, follicular unit count or hair thickness [16].
Population
Young men only [15][16].
Sources
[15], [16]
Caveats
Two small trials that disagree on DHT. No trial has measured hair loss over years or in women.
D-aspartic acidLimitedStudied in menHow often is not known

Lower testosterone at 6 g a day

One small trial found 6 g a day for 14 days lowered total and free testosterone in 24 trained men. A 12-week trial found no change.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In trained men, 6 g a day for 14 days lowered total testosterone (p = 0.03), and free testosterone was lower than with the flour placebo (p = 0.005). Estradiol, SHBG and albumin did not change [3].
Population
24 resistance-trained men [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
The 12-week trial at the same dose found no change in testosterone [4].
D-aspartic acidLimitedStudied in menHow often is not known

Lower estradiol over 12 weeks

One small trial found estradiol fell 16% from baseline over 12 weeks at 6 g a day in men.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Over 12 weeks at 6 g a day, estradiol fell 16% (95% CI -27% to -5%) from baseline. The placebo group showed improved spinal responsiveness at the gastrocnemius that the supplement group did not [4].
Population
10 men analyzed in the supplement group and 9 on placebo [4].
Sources
[4]
Caveats
One small trial. The authors received no specific funding [4].
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)LimitedHow often is not known

Pregnancy

The label states that human data are too limited to inform risks in pregnancy, and that treatment may increase bleeding during pregnancy and delivery.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The apixaban label states that limited available data in pregnant women are insufficient to inform drug-associated risks of major birth defects, miscarriage or adverse developmental outcomes, and that treatment may increase the risk of bleeding during pregnancy and delivery. No adverse developmental effects were seen in rats, rabbits and mice [22]. The rivaroxaban label warns of pregnancy-related hemorrhage [23].
Population
Limited human reports and animal studies summarized in labeling [22].
Sources
[22], [23]
Caveats
No controlled study in pregnant women was sourced.
FinasterideLimitedStudied in menHow often is not known

Sexual symptoms that persist after stopping (post-finasteride syndrome)

Case reports: men describe low libido and erectile dysfunction lasting months to years after stopping. The label lists persistent sexual dysfunction among postmarketing reports.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In interviews with men reporting sexual symptoms that lasted at least 3 months after stopping, 94% reported low libido, 92% erectile dysfunction, 92% reduced arousal and 69% orgasm problems. Mean use had been 28 months, and symptoms had lasted a mean 40 months since stopping [12]. In the FDA adverse event database, 577 reports of persistent sexual dysfunction were found among 4,910 reports in men aged 18 to 45 on low-dose finasteride, a reporting rate 28 times that of all other drugs (EBGM 28.0, 95% CI 26.1 to 30.0) [13]. The current Propecia label lists sexual dysfunction that continued after stopping, including erectile, libido, ejaculation and orgasm disorders, among postmarketing reports [10].
Population
71 men aged 21 to 46 recruited for persistent symptoms [12]; FAERS reports from 1998 to 2013 [13]; postmarketing reports [10].
Sources
[12], [13], [10]
Caveats
[12] recruited men who already had symptoms and relied on recall, so it cannot give a rate. Database reporting ratios measure reporting, not incidence. No controlled trial measured persistence after stopping.
FinasterideLimitedHow often is not known

Compounded topical finasteride

FDA states it received 32 reports linked to compounded topical finasteride, including sexual and mood effects, most continuing after the product was stopped.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
FDA reported 32 cases in its adverse event reporting system from 2019 to 2024 linked to compounded topical finasteride. Reported events included erectile dysfunction, decreased libido, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, brain fog, fatigue, insomnia and testicular pain, plus local irritation, redness, dryness and burning. FDA states most reports describe events that continued after the product was stopped [6].
Population
FDA Adverse Event Reporting System cases, 2019 to 2024 [6].
Sources
[6]
Caveats
Case reports cannot give a rate. The alert concerns compounded products, not the formulations tested in trials.
FinasterideLimitedHow often is not known

Exposure in pregnancy

The label warns that women who are or may become pregnant must not use finasteride or handle broken tablets, because of risk to a male fetus.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states women who are or may become pregnant must not use finasteride or handle crushed or broken tablets, because of risk to a male fetus [10].
Population
Label statement [10].
Sources
[10]
Caveats
Label statement, not a trial rate.
Fish oilLimitedStudied in womenHow often is not known

Fibroids with higher marine omega-3 intake from food

Mixed results: two cohorts of Black women linked the highest marine omega-3 or DHA intake from food to 18% to 49% more fibroids. A larger cohort found no link.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In 12,044 premenopausal Black women followed 8 years, the highest fifth of marine omega-3 intake was linked to more fibroid diagnoses than the lowest (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.34), and dark-meat fish to IRR 1.13 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.28) [51]. In 1,171 Black women screened by ultrasound over 5 years, the highest quarter of DHA intake was linked to 49% more new fibroids (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14), and total marine omega-3 to HR 1.35 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.93) [52]. In 81,590 US nurses followed 18 years, no type of dietary fat was linked to fibroids. In 553 of them with blood tests, the highest third of red blood cell omega-3 was linked to lower odds of fibroids (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.89) [53].
Population
Premenopausal Black women in the US [51][52]; premenopausal US nurses aged 25 to 42 at enrollment [53].
Sources
[51], [52], [53]
Caveats
Observational, and these studies measured omega-3 from food, not fish oil supplements. The authors of [52] note that pollutants in fish, rather than the fatty acids, may drive the link. Diet tracks other habits, so confounding is possible.
GnRH drugs for fibroidsLimitedHow often is not known

Use with hormonal birth control

The Myfembree label says to avoid hormonal contraceptives during treatment, as estrogen-containing methods may raise estrogen side effects and lower the drug's effect.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The Myfembree label directs stopping hormonal contraceptives before starting, and using non-hormonal contraception during treatment and for one week after [2]. The Oriahnn label states the effect of hormonal contraceptives on its efficacy is unknown and directs non-hormonal contraception during treatment and for 28 days after [6].
Population
Label statements [2][6].
Sources
[2], [6]
Caveats
No trial measured the combination.
GrapefruitLimitedStudied in womenHow often is not known

Breast cancer

Mixed results: one cohort linked a quarter grapefruit a day to 30% higher breast cancer risk after menopause, and two larger cohorts of women found no link.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Among postmenopausal women, a quarter grapefruit or more a day was linked to higher breast cancer risk than eating none (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.58) [22]. In the Nurses' Health Study, a quarter grapefruit or more a day was not linked to breast cancer (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15), nor was grapefruit juice [23]. In EPIC, women eating 60 g or more a day had no higher risk than women eating none (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.13) [24].
Population
Over 50,000 postmenopausal women with 1,657 cases [22]. 77,050 women with 4,315 cases [23]. 114,504 women followed a median 9.5 years, with 3,747 cases [24].
Sources
[22], [23], [24]
Caveats
Observational studies of reported diet, open to confounding. Two larger cohorts did not repeat the first finding [23][24].
hCGLimitedHow often is not known

Adverse effects

The label lists headache, irritability, depression, fatigue, swelling and injection site reactions, breast growth in men and ovarian hyperstimulation in women. It gives no rates.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The Pregnyl label lists, for men and women, hypersensitivity reactions including rare anaphylaxis, irritability, restlessness, depression, headache, edema, fatigue, and bruising, pain, redness, swelling or itching at the injection site. In men, it states hCG may sporadically cause gynecomastia, that water and sodium retention is occasionally seen at high doses, and lists precocious puberty. In women, it lists ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, which can become serious, and rare thromboembolism, usually with severe hyperstimulation [8].
Population
People treated with hCG for approved uses, as described in labeling [8].
Sources
[8]
Caveats
The label does not give how often each reaction occurs or compare it with placebo [8]. It does not describe use for weight loss or alongside testosterone.
HydroxyzineLimitedHow often is not known

Pregnancy

Mixed results: the label lists early pregnancy as a contraindication on animal data, while one study of 53 exposed pregnancies found no rise in birth defects.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states that hydroxyzine caused fetal abnormalities in rats and mice at doses substantially above the human range, that human data are inadequate, and that the drug is contraindicated in early pregnancy [5]. In a prospective controlled study, 53 women exposed to hydroxyzine during organ formation had rates of major and minor anomalies, live birth, miscarriage, birth weight and neonatal distress that did not differ from controls [15].
Population
120 women exposed to hydroxyzine or cetirizine in pregnancy, 53 of them to hydroxyzine during organogenesis [15].
Sources
[5], [15]
Caveats
The human study is too small to detect uncommon birth defects.
IsotretinoinLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

FDA boxed warning: birth defects

FDA states isotretinoin can cause life-threatening birth defects, with an extremely high risk from any amount taken during pregnancy, even briefly. The label gives no rate.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The boxed warning states there is an extremely high risk that life-threatening birth defects will result if pregnancy occurs while taking any amount, even for short periods, and that potentially any exposed fetus can be affected. The documented defects include malformations of the skull, face, ears, eyes, brain, heart, thymus and parathyroid glands, some fatal, along with IQ scores under 85, miscarriage and premature birth [3].
Population
Human pregnancies exposed to isotretinoin, summarized in labeling [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
The label gives no rate. None of the 31 Cochrane trials reported birth defects, because pregnant people were excluded [4].
LamotrigineLimitedHow often is not known

Interaction with estrogen-containing birth control

The label states estrogen-containing birth control pills lowered lamotrigine levels by about 50%, and levels can double during the pill-free week.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
A pill containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 150 mcg levonorgestrel lowered lamotrigine concentrations by about 50%, and lamotrigine lowered levonorgestrel by 19%. During the pill-free week, lamotrigine levels are expected to rise, up to double by the end of the week, with possible dizziness, unsteadiness and double vision. Other estrogen products, including menopausal hormone therapy, were not studied [4].
Population
Drug interaction studies described in the label [4].
Sources
[4]
Caveats
Measured as blood levels, with no rate of harm given.
Letrozole and clomipheneLimitedHow often is not known

Ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors

Linked to borderline ovarian tumors and, in one cohort, invasive ovarian cancer after fertility drugs including clomiphene, in observational studies the reviewers rated very low in certainty.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
A Cochrane review of 37 observational studies (4,684,724 women) did no meta-analysis. One cohort found a raised rate of invasive ovarian cancer in subfertile women given fertility drugs (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.18), higher in women who stayed childless after clomiphene (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.30 to 4.78). For borderline tumors, one cohort found an SIR of 7.47 (95% CI 1.54 to 21.83) after clomiphene on 12 cases, and a case-control study an SIR of 2.5 (95% CI 1.3 to 4.5) on 11 cases [18]. A Cochrane review of clomiphene in unexplained subfertility notes that use for more than 12 cycles has been associated with a threefold rise in ovarian cancer risk [8]. The clomiphene label states epidemiology data suggest prolonged use may raise the risk of a borderline or invasive ovarian tumor [1].
Population
4,684,724 women in 13 case-control and 24 cohort studies [18].
Sources
[18], [8], [1]
Caveats
Infertility itself is a risk factor for ovarian cancer, the number of cancers was very small, and dose and drug type were poorly recorded [18]. No data were sourced on letrozole alone.
Menopausal hormone therapyLimitedStudied in womenHow often is not known

Cervical cancer

Limited evidence: observational studies linked hormone therapy to lower cervical cancer risk overall but more cervical cell abnormalities.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In observational studies, current or continued hormone therapy was associated with lower cervical cancer risk overall (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.85) and with more cervical cell abnormalities (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.55). Adenocarcinoma odds were higher (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.65), and squamous cell carcinoma odds lower (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.96) [21].
Population
5 cohort and 4 case-control studies, 60 to 584,742 women each [21].
Sources
[21]
Caveats
Observational only. The adenocarcinoma interval includes no difference, and subtype explained much of the heterogeneity [21].
MirtazapineLimitedHow often is not known

Pregnancy

Mixed results: most studies found outcomes like those in unexposed pregnancies, findings on birth defects and miscarriage conflicted, and newborn adaptation symptoms followed late exposure.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
A systematic review of 41 studies found outcomes in mirtazapine-exposed pregnancies comparable to controls in most studies, conflicting results on congenital malformations and spontaneous abortion, and reports of neonatal adaptation syndrome after exposure late in pregnancy [17]. The label states that published observational studies and postmarketing reports have not reliably identified a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes [7].
Population
15 cohort studies, one case-control study, 11 case series and 14 case reports [17].
Sources
[17], [7]
Caveats
The review rated the overall quality of evidence low, and found too little data on breastfeeding to draw conclusions.
Modafinil and armodafinilLimitedHow often is not known

Hormonal birth control

The label warns that modafinil and armodafinil may reduce how well hormonal birth control prevents pregnancy, during use and for a month after stopping.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Modafinil induces the liver enzyme CYP3A4/5, which may lower blood levels of steroidal contraceptives such as ethinyl estradiol. The labels state their effectiveness may be reduced while taking the drug and for one month after stopping, including depot and implanted forms [3][6]. Armodafinil 250 mg lowered exposure to midazolam, another drug cleared by this enzyme, by 32% [6].
Population
Labeling statement based on drug interaction studies [3][6].
Sources
[3], [6]
Caveats
The labels give no rate of unplanned pregnancy.
Muscle relaxantsLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

The labels report withdrawal symptoms in newborns after baclofen through pregnancy and fetal abnormalities after methocarbamol, with no controlled studies in pregnant women.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The baclofen label states that withdrawal symptoms, including increased muscle tone, tremor, jitteriness and seizure, have been reported in newborns whose mothers took oral baclofen throughout pregnancy [14]. The methocarbamol label states that there have been reports of fetal and congenital abnormalities after exposure in the womb [15]. The tizanidine label states that, based on animal data, it may cause fetal harm [12]. The cyclobenzaprine label reports no harm in animal studies and no adequate studies in pregnant women [10].
Population
Pregnant women and newborns, as described in the labels [14][15][12][10].
Sources
[14], [15], [12], [10]
Caveats
Case reports and animal data with no rate.
Opioid pain relieversLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy: withdrawal in the newborn

FDA states that extended use in pregnancy can cause neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, which may be life-threatening if not recognized and treated.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The boxed warning states that use of opioids for an extended period during pregnancy can result in neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, which may be life-threatening if not recognized and treated and needs management by neonatology experts [20][16].
Population
Pregnant women using opioids for an extended period, and their newborns, as described in the labels [20][16].
Sources
[20], [16]
Caveats
The labels give no rate.
Oral corticosteroidsLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

Linked to oral cleft in babies exposed in the first trimester, with odds 3.35 times as high in case-control studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Pooling case-control studies, first-trimester exposure was associated with oral cleft (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.97 to 5.69). For major malformations overall the pooled odds ratio from cohort studies was 1.45 (95% CI 0.80 to 2.60), and the authors' own prospective cohort found no difference [31]. The prednisone label states there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women and that animal studies found more cleft palate [20].
Population
Pregnant women in a prospective cohort and in the cohort and case-control studies pooled with it [31].
Sources
[31], [20]
Caveats
Observational, published in 2000. The illness being treated may contribute.
PhentermineLimitedStudied in pregnancyHow often is not known

Birth defects from topiramate

The label states first-trimester topiramate exposure raises the risk of major birth defects, including cleft lip and palate, and requires pregnancy testing.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The Qsymia label states that first-trimester topiramate exposure increases the risk of major congenital malformations, including cleft lip and cleft palate, and of being small for gestational age, based on pregnancy registries and epidemiologic studies. Qsymia is available only through a REMS program, and the label calls for a negative pregnancy test before starting and monthly during use [8].
Population
Pregnancy registries and epidemiologic studies of topiramate, summarized in the label [8].
Sources
[8]
Caveats
The underlying registry data are summarized in the label, not reported here study by study.
Progestins for endometriosis and heavy bleedingLimitedHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

The norethindrone acetate label contraindicates use in pregnancy, citing reports of mild masculinization of female fetuses and hypospadias after first-trimester exposure.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states several reports suggest an association between progestin exposure in the first trimester and genital abnormalities in male and female fetuses [2]. The injection label advises stopping treatment if pregnancy occurs [1].
Population
Reports summarized on the label [2].
Sources
[2], [1]
Caveats
Reports give no rate.
ProlactinLimitedHow often is not known

Further testing after a result just above the laboratory's upper limit

One hospital review found 298 people with results just above one assay's upper limit had 39 MRI scans and 28 specialist referrals, with no new prolactin disorder identified.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Over 6 months, 298 patients had a prolactin result between the manufacturer's upper limit for the Roche assay and the higher limit the study derived. No cases of clinically significant prolactin excess were identified among them beyond people already diagnosed and under routine monitoring. The further evaluation the authors judged unnecessary included 459 repeat prolactin tests, 57 macroprolactin tests, 39 MRI studies and 28 endocrine referrals, and 11 patients received dopamine agonist drugs. The minimum cost at Medicare rates was $34,134 [3].
Population
206 women and 92 men at one US center, January to June 2022 [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
One retrospective chart review at one center with one assay. The authors acknowledge that a person with a true prolactin disorder could in theory present below their higher limit [3].
Red meat and processed meatLimitedStudied in womenHow often is not known

Fibroids with higher red meat intake

Limited evidence: one Italian case-control study linked the most beef and red meat to 70% higher odds of fibroids, while a Korean study found no overall link.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Against the lowest third of intake, the highest third of beef and other red meat was linked to higher odds of fibroids (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.2), and ham to OR 1.3 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.6). Women with fibroids also reported eating fewer green vegetables, fruit and fish [13]. In 672 Korean women examined by ultrasound, red meat intake was not linked to fibroids overall, and premenopausal women in the second quarter of intake had lower odds than the lowest quarter (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.91). In postmenopausal women, higher processed meat intake was linked to higher odds (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.21 to 4.49) [14].
Population
843 women with fibroids and 1,557 hospital controls in Italy, 1986 to 1997 [13]; 672 Korean women aged 23 to 73, 220 of them with fibroids [14].
Sources
[13], [14]
Caveats
Observational. The Italian study asked women with a recent diagnosis about their diet, so recall can differ between cases and controls, and diet tracks other habits, so confounding is possible [13]. The Korean study was cross-sectional and its meat intakes were low [14]. No prospective cohort of red meat and fibroids was located.
SARMsGrey marketLimitedHow often is not known

FDA warnings

FDA states life-threatening reactions, including liver injury needing hospitalization, have occurred with SARM products, and lists potential heart attack, stroke, psychosis and infertility.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
FDA states that life-threatening reactions, including liver injuries that required hospitalization, have occurred in people taking products containing SARMs. It lists potential heart attack or stroke, psychosis or hallucinations, sleep disturbance, sexual dysfunction, liver failure, infertility, miscarriage and testicular shrinkage. FDA testing of one product labeled as containing YK-11 found an undeclared anabolic steroid, after an adverse event report of a stroke [10]. Warning letters in 2023 and December 2025 told sellers that SARM products were unapproved new drugs, despite labels saying they were for research only [11][12].
Population
US consumers and sellers [10][11][12].
Sources
[10], [11], [12]
Caveats
Regulator statements of potential harm, without rates.
Soy foodsLimitedHow often is not known

Breast growth in men and boys

Case reports: breast growth in a man drinking 3 quarts of soy milk a day and in an 8-year-old boy eating a lot of soy, resolving after soy was stopped.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
A 60-year-old man with breast enlargement, erectile dysfunction and estradiol and estrone about 4 times the upper reference limit drank 3 quarts of soy milk a day. His breast tenderness resolved and estradiol slowly returned to normal after he stopped [22]. An 8-year-old boy developed one-sided breast growth with marked dietary soy intake, which resolved completely when high-soy foods were excluded [23].
Population
One adult man [22]. One prepubertal boy [23].
Sources
[22], [23]
Caveats
Case reports cannot give a rate. Pooled clinical studies found no change in men's estrogen or testosterone (see Outcomes).
SpironolactoneLimitedHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

The label warns that spironolactone may affect sex development of a male fetus, based on rat studies. Limited case reports did not show birth defects.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states that, based on its mechanism and on animal studies, spironolactone may affect sex differentiation of the male during embryogenesis. Rat studies found feminization of male fetuses and endocrine dysfunction in females exposed before birth. Limited data from published case reports and case series did not demonstrate an association with major malformations [3].
Population
Rats, and a limited number of published human case reports, as described in the label [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
The warning rests on animal data and mechanism. The human data are too few to give a rate.
SSRIsLimitedHow often is not known

Sexual symptoms that continue after stopping

Limited evidence: a literature review describes sexual symptoms persisting after SSRIs are stopped, including genital numbness and low desire, with no prevalence established.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
A review of the published literature lists the reported symptoms as genital anesthesia, weak or pleasureless orgasm, decreased sex drive, erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. It found no established prevalence, cause or treatment [32].
Population
Published reports of people with sexual symptoms after stopping an SSRI [32].
Sources
[32]
Caveats
No denominator, so no rate. The diagnosis is made by excluding other causes [32].
Thiazide diureticsLimitedHow often is not known

Use in pregnancy

The label states that routine use of diuretics in a normal pregnancy exposes mother and fetus to unnecessary hazard. It gives no rate.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The hydrochlorothiazide label states that routine use of diuretics during normal pregnancy is inappropriate and exposes mother and fetus to unnecessary hazard, that diuretics do not prevent toxemia of pregnancy, and that thiazides are indicated in pregnancy when edema has a pathologic cause [14].
Population
Pregnant women, as described in the label [14].
Sources
[14]
Caveats
The label cites no study and gives no rate.
TirzepatideLimitedHow often is not known

Birth control pills and other medicines taken by mouth (label)

The label warns that tirzepatide lowers birth control pill levels and tells users to switch to or add a non-oral method for 4 weeks after starting and each dose increase.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states that tirzepatide delays stomach emptying, which lowers exposure to oral hormonal contraceptives. The delay is largest after the first dose and lessens over time. It tells people using birth control pills to switch to a non-oral method, or add a barrier method, for 4 weeks after starting and for 4 weeks after each dose increase. Contraceptives not taken by mouth are not expected to be affected. It names warfarin among medicines with a narrow therapeutic range to monitor [25].
Population
Clinical pharmacology studies, as reported in the label [25].
Sources
[25]
Caveats
The label does not report pregnancy rates on combined use.
TopiramateLimitedHow often is not known

Interaction with hormonal birth control

The label warns of reduced birth control effect and breakthrough bleeding, especially above 200 mg a day, where ethinyl estradiol exposure fell 18% to 30%.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
At 50 to 200 mg a day, topiramate did not significantly change exposure to either part of a norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol pill. In patients also taking valproic acid, ethinyl estradiol exposure fell 18%, 21% and 30% at 200, 400 and 800 mg a day. The label states that reduced contraceptive efficacy and breakthrough bleeding may occur with estrogen-containing or progestin-only products, and that efficacy can fall without bleeding [3].
Population
Healthy volunteers and patients in drug interaction studies [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
The label states the clinical significance of the measured changes is not known [3].
TrazodoneLimitedHow often is not known

Sexual side effects

The label lists impotence, retrograde ejaculation and changes in libido among reactions seen in under 2% of people in controlled trials.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label lists impotence, retrograde ejaculation, increased libido, early menses and missed periods among adverse reactions occurring at an incidence under 2% in controlled studies. It gives no placebo rates for these [12].
Population
Adults in controlled depression studies [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
The label gives only an upper bound of 2% and no comparator, so no band can be set. See priapism below.
TrazodoneLimitedStudied in menHow often is not known

Priapism

The label warns of priapism, a painful erection lasting more than 6 hours, in men taking trazodone. It gives no rate.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label reports cases of priapism in men receiving trazodone and states that untreated priapism can cause irreversible damage to erectile tissue [12]. In a case series, episodes lasted a mean of 26.5 hours, trazodone dose did not differ between affected men and controls, and some men had lasting depressive, anxiety and sexual symptoms at follow-up [19].
Population
Postmarketing reports [12]; men with trazodone-associated priapism compared with trazodone users without it [19].
Sources
[12], [19]
Caveats
Reports with no denominator. The abstract of the case series does not give the number of men [19].
TribulusLimitedHow often is not known

Priapism

Case reports: one man had a 72-hour erection after a tribulus-based supplement, needing surgery, with impaired sexual function afterward.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
A 36-year-old man developed a 72-hour priapism after a tribulus-based herbal supplement. He needed a cavernoglandular shunt, and sexual function afterward was impaired [14].
Population
One case report [14].
Sources
[14]
Caveats
A single case.
Ulipristal acetateLimitedHow often is not known

Interactions with hormonal contraception and liver enzyme drugs

The ella label states progestin contraceptives may weaken its effect and that it may weaken them, and that CYP3A4 inducers such as rifampin lower its levels.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states progestin-containing contraceptives may impair ella's ability to delay ovulation, that ella may affect the progestin in hormonal contraceptives, and that its directions are to start hormonal contraception no sooner than 5 days after ella, with a barrier method until the next period. Rifampin, a CYP3A4 inducer, lowered ulipristal levels significantly, and CYP3A4 inhibitors such as itraconazole or ketoconazole raise them [9]. A 2025 review notes one transplant case in a woman also using raspberry leaf, a CYP3A4 inhibitor [13].
Population
Pharmacokinetic studies and label statements [9]; case review [13].
Sources
[9], [13]
Caveats
Drug level studies, not outcome trials.
Vitamin ALimitedHow often is not known

Birth defects

Linked to about 4.8 times more of certain birth defects in babies of women taking over 10,000 IU of preformed vitamin A a day, mostly before week 7.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Defects of cranial neural crest origin were 4.8 times as common in babies of women taking more than 10,000 IU of preformed vitamin A a day from supplements as in those taking 5,000 IU or less (95% CI 2.2 to 10.5). The authors found a threshold near 10,000 IU a day and estimate 1 affected infant in 57 at that intake. The excess was concentrated in intake before week 7 [11].
Population
22,748 pregnant women in the US, 339 babies with birth defects [11].
Sources
[11]
Caveats
One observational cohort with diet recalled by interview. EFSA chose birth defects as the effect on which it bases the upper limit for preformed vitamin A [9][11].
ZolpidemLimitedHow often is not known

Pregnancy

The label reports breathing problems and sedation in newborns exposed late in pregnancy. One registry study linked zolpidem in pregnancy to low birth weight and preterm delivery.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states that neonates born to mothers using zolpidem late in the third trimester have had respiratory depression and sedation, in some reports needing ventilation, and that published observational studies, registries and case reports do not show a clear association with major birth defects [13]. In a Taiwan registry study, mothers who received zolpidem in pregnancy had higher odds of low birth weight (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.64), preterm delivery (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.74), small-for-gestational-age infants (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.49) and cesarean delivery (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.59 to 1.90) [32].
Population
2,497 mothers who received zolpidem during pregnancy and 12,485 who did not [32]; published reports summarized in labeling [13].
Sources
[13], [32]
Caveats
Observational, and insomnia or the conditions behind it may account for part of the association. The label gives no rate for neonatal effects.
Thunder god vineCautionStrong

Irregular periods and reproductive effects

Shown to raise irregular periods about fourfold over control. In lupus nephritis trials, they were more common than on azathioprine or leflunomide.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Irregular menstruation was more common on TwHF than on control (OR 4.65, 95% CI 3.08 to 7.03) [11]. In lupus nephritis trials, new irregular menstruation was more common on tripterygium glycosides with glucocorticoids than on azathioprine (ratio 3.57, 95% CI 1.40 to 9.11) or leflunomide (ratio 6.69, 95% CI 2.42 to 18.46) with glucocorticoids [9]. In the 207-patient rheumatoid arthritis trial, 7 women on TwHF, 3 on methotrexate and 5 on both developed irregular menstruation (p 0.216 for TwHF against methotrexate) [4].
Population
Users across pooled studies [11]. Lupus nephritis trial patients [9]. 207 rheumatoid arthritis patients [4].
Sources
[11], [9], [4]
Caveats
The abstracts do not report sperm counts or fertility outcomes in men.
BoronLimited

Changes in sex hormones

Small trials found 10 mg a day lowered estradiol in men, while 3 mg a day gave opposite results in two studies of postmenopausal women.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In men, estradiol fell and dihydrotestosterone rose after one week of 10 mg a day [2]. In postmenopausal women, 3 mg a day raised serum estradiol and testosterone in one study [3] and did not change them in another [4].
Population
8 men [2]; postmenopausal women in metabolic units [3][4].
Sources
[2], [3], [4]
Caveats
Hormone shifts were measured, and no study followed health outcomes.
Raw food dietLimited

Underweight and missed periods

Linked to underweight in 15% of men and 25% of women, and to partial or complete loss of periods in about 30% of women under 45.

The numbers and sources
Effect
BMI was below 18.5 in 14.7% of men and 25.0% of women. About 30% of women under 45 had partial to complete amenorrhea, more often in those eating more than 90% raw food [1].
Population
513 long-term raw food eaters, questionnaire survey [1]. Observational.
Sources
[1]
Caveats
Self-reported, cross-sectional, no comparison group [1].
SaunaLimitedStudied in men

Sperm count and motility

One small study found sperm count and motility fell after 3 months of twice-weekly saunas in 10 men, and recovered fully within 6 months of stopping.

The numbers and sources
Effect
After two 15-minute sessions a week at 80°C to 90°C for 3 months, sperm count and motility were strongly impaired (P < 0.001). The share of sperm with normal mitochondrial function fell from 76.8% to 54.0%, and with normal chromatin condensation from 70.7% to 63.6%. Sex hormones did not change. All effects had reversed 6 months after the sessions ended [29].
Population
10 men with normal sperm counts at the start [29].
Sources
[29], [35]
Caveats
Ten men, no control group, and none had abnormal sperm at baseline. A systematic review of 40 sauna studies with 3,855 participants found this was the only study reporting an adverse health outcome [35]. Fertility itself was not measured.
SaunaLimitedStudied in women

Missed periods after intensive use

One small study found prolactin rose more than four-fold and 5 of 7 women had temporarily absent periods after a week of twice-daily one-hour saunas.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 7 women exposed to an 80°C sauna for 1 hour twice a day for 7 days, serum prolactin rose more than four-fold (P < 0.01). Transient amenorrhea occurred in 5 of the 7 after the experiment, which the authors suggest may be associated with the prolactin release [28].
Population
7 healthy women [28].
Sources
[28]
Caveats
Seven women, no control group, and an exposure of 2 hours a day that is far beyond the sessions used in other studies.

Mixed results70

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)StrongStudied in women

Diagnosing polycystic ovary syndrome

Mixed results: three meta-analyses found AMH detected PCOS with 79% to 83% sensitivity and 79% to 87% specificity, and the largest judged AMH alone insufficient to diagnose it.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
PCOS diagnosed by the Rotterdam criteria, or in some studies by the NIH or Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria, against women without PCOS
Effect
In 68 studies of adults, AMH had a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.82) and specificity of 0.87 (0.84 to 0.89), with high heterogeneity (I² 86% and 91%). In 11 studies of adolescents the figures were 0.66 and 0.78. The authors concluded that AMH alone is insufficient for diagnosing PCOS and that the data did not support a single international cut-off [22]. A second meta-analysis found 81% sensitivity and 82% specificity in case-control studies and 80% and 85% in cross-sectional studies, and rated the certainty of the evidence as low [23]. An earlier meta-analysis of studies using the Rotterdam criteria reported an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92) and, at a cut-off of 4.7 ng/mL, a specificity of 79.4% and a sensitivity of 82.8% [24]. The 2023 international PCOS guideline accepts AMH in place of ultrasound to define polycystic ovarian morphology in adults, advises against AMH as a single test for PCOS and against its use in adolescents, and calls for population and assay specific cut-offs [25].
Population
82 studies [22]. 45 studies [23]. 10 studies, with individual values extracted from 4 [24].
Sources
[22], [23], [24], [25]
Caveats
Cut-offs differed between studies and assays [22]. The guideline lists age, body mass index, hormonal contraception and the day of the cycle as influences on AMH [25]. Polycystic ovarian morphology, which AMH stands in for, is itself one of the diagnostic criteria [25].
Free testosteroneStrongStudied in women

Diagnosing raised androgens in polycystic ovary syndrome

Shown in three meta-analyses to pick out women with PCOS with 76% to 89% sensitivity and 82% to 85% specificity, as calculated free testosterone or the free androgen index.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
PCOS diagnosed by the Rotterdam, NIH or Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria, against women without PCOS
Effect
In one meta-analysis, calculated free testosterone had a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.96), specificity of 0.83 (0.79 to 0.86) and area under the curve of 0.85 (0.81 to 0.88). The free androgen index had 0.78, 0.85 and 0.87. Mass spectrometry gave better sensitivity than direct immunoassay for both, and better specificity [22]. Two meta-analyses of the free androgen index alone found a sensitivity of 0.76 and specificity of 0.82, area under the curve 0.84, in 7 studies [23], and 0.81 and 0.82, area under the curve 0.88, in 14 studies whose cut-offs varied [24]. The 2023 international PCOS guideline names free testosterone, assessed by calculation, equilibrium dialysis or ammonium sulfate precipitation, or estimated with the free androgen index, as a first test alongside total testosterone [25].
Population
2,857 participants, 1,650 with PCOS, in 18 studies [22]. 7 studies [23]. 2,870 women with PCOS and 3,985 without, in 14 studies [24].
Sources
[22], [23], [24], [25]
Caveats
The free androgen index is calculated from total testosterone and SHBG, so it shifts with SHBG, which changes with age, weight and medication [22]. Raised androgens are one of the criteria that define PCOS, so the test is partly measured against a diagnosis it helps make. The guideline notes that the combined pill raises SHBG, which makes testing in women taking it unreliable [25].
25-hydroxyvitamin DModerateStudied in women

Endometriosis

Mixed results: one meta-analysis linked endometriosis to lower vitamin D, while a second review of nine studies found three showed no difference.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 9 studies, women with endometriosis had lower vitamin D than controls (standardized mean difference -0.97, 95% CI -1.80 to -0.14), and lower in stage III to IV than in stage I to II (-1.33, -2.54 to -0.12). Vitamin D deficiency was not significantly more common (odds ratio 2.77, 0.85 to 6.08) [26]. A second review of 9 studies found that 6 reported a difference in 25-hydroxyvitamin D between women with and without endometriosis and 3 did not [27].
Population
9 studies [26]. 976 women with endometriosis and 674 controls in 9 studies [27].
Sources
[26], [27]
Caveats
Observational, with high heterogeneity. The gap was larger in women not using hormones, so hormone treatment may affect the comparison [26].
AcupunctureModerateStudied in women

Hot flashes in menopause

Mixed results: hot flash frequency did not differ from sham acupuncture, fell compared with no treatment, and was higher than with hormone therapy.

Compared with sham acupuncture [15]; waiting list or no intervention [15]; hormone therapy [15]; relaxation [15]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against sham, hot flash frequency did not differ (-1.13 flushes a day, 95% CI -2.55 to 0.29, 8 trials, 414 women) and severity was slightly lower (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.05), a difference that disappeared once trials in women with breast cancer were removed. Against no treatment, frequency fell (SMD -0.50, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.31, 3 trials, 463 women). Women on hormone therapy had 3.18 fewer flushes a day than women given acupuncture [15].
Population
16 trials with 1,155 perimenopausal or postmenopausal women [15].
Sources
[15]
Caveats
Evidence was low or very low in quality, and adverse effect data were lacking [15].
AcupunctureModerateStudied in women

Endometriosis pain

Mixed results: reviews of mostly unblinded trials found less endometriosis pain with acupuncture, while a sham-controlled trial found period pain eased during treatment but not 12 weeks later.

Compared with placebo, traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine [30]; medications and herbs, and placebo in one pilot trial [31]; sham acupuncture [32]; a comparison the source abstract does not describe [33]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 14 studies (793 patients), pain severity fell more with acupuncture than with control treatments (SMD -1.10, 95% CI -1.45 to -0.75) [30]. Across 10 studies, pain fell 1.36 points more on a 0 to 10 scale (95% CI 1.01 to 1.72) [31]. In a sham-controlled trial of 12 weeks of treatment, period pain fell more with acupuncture by the end of treatment but not by week 24, pain lasted fewer days, and pelvic pain outside periods and pain with sex did not differ. Adverse events did not differ [32]. A Cochrane review found one trial (67 women) meeting its criteria, with lower period pain scores in the acupuncture group (MD -4.81 points) [33].
Population
793 patients in 14 studies [30]; 10 studies of 8 to 36 patients per arm [31]; 106 women aged 20 to 40 with endometriosis pain at 4 hospitals in China [32]; 67 women [33].
Sources
[30], [31], [32], [33]
Caveats
Only one pilot trial in [31] used a placebo control, and the rest could not be blinded. The authors of [30] point to design and quality flaws in the trials.
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)Moderate

Natural conception in women without infertility

Mixed results: three cohorts found low AMH did not lower the chance of natural conception, one larger cohort did, and a pooled analysis found poor predictive value.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In women aged 30 to 44 trying to conceive for 3 months or less, those with AMH below 0.7 ng/mL had a predicted probability of conceiving of 65% by 6 cycles (95% CI 50% to 75%) against 62% (57% to 66%) with normal values, and 84% against 75% by 12 cycles [8]. In women with one or two earlier losses, low AMH (below 1.00 ng/mL) and high AMH (above 3.5) were not associated with the chance of conceiving in a cycle (odds ratios 1.13, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.49, and 1.04, 0.87 to 1.24) [7]. In 102 women planning pregnancy, AMH did not predict time to ongoing pregnancy once age was accounted for [10]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine's 2026 opinion describes the studies as conflicting: it cites a cohort of 3,150 women in which AMH below 1 ng/mL went with a lower chance of pregnancy, and a meta-analysis of 11 studies with 4,388 women in which AMH had poor predictive value for spontaneous pregnancy (area under the curve 0.59) [11].
Population
750 women aged 30 to 44 [8]. 1,202 women aged 18 to 40 at four US centers [7]. 102 women planning pregnancy [10].
Sources
[8], [7], [10], [11], [3], [12]
Caveats
Observational. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists states that using AMH for fertility counseling in women without a diagnosis of infertility is not supported by data from high-quality sources, and that a single level in women with presumed fertility does not appear useful in predicting time to pregnancy and is not for use in counseling on it [3]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine states that markers of ovarian reserve are not to be used as a fertility test for women who are not infertile or whose fertility is untested, or to promote planned egg freezing [12].
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)ModerateStudied in women

Live birth after IVF

Mixed results: AMH had some association with live birth after IVF in one meta-analysis, which called its predictive accuracy poor, and added nothing to age in another.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a meta-analysis of 13 studies, the diagnostic odds ratio of AMH for live birth was 2.39 (95% CI 1.85 to 3.08) in women of unknown ovarian reserve and 4.63 (2.75 to 7.81) in women expected to have low reserve. The authors conclude that AMH has some association with live birth and that its predictive accuracy is poor [14]. In pooled individual data, age predicted ongoing pregnancy after IVF with an area under the curve of 0.57 and no ovarian reserve test added to it [13]. Across four assays in one clinic, the accuracy of pregnancy prediction was uniformly low (0.62 to 0.63) [15].
Population
5,764 women of unknown ovarian reserve and 542 expected to have low reserve [14]. 5,705 women [13]. 83 patients [15].
Sources
[14], [13], [15], [12]
Caveats
Observational. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine states that AMH has only a weak association with oocyte quality, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates [12].
CalciumModerate

Preeclampsia and high blood pressure in pregnancy

Mixed results: the 2025 Cochrane update found little to no difference in preeclampsia, while the 2018 version and earlier reviews found fewer cases at 1 g a day or more.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Sources disagree. The 2025 Cochrane update found little to no difference in preeclampsia against placebo (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.04, 6 RCTs, 15,364 women, low certainty). In the 4 trials of 500 or more women (14,730), the RR was 0.92 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.05, high certainty), and preterm birth before 37 weeks did not differ (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.11). Baseline calcium intake and preeclampsia risk did not change the findings, and low and high doses did not differ (RR 0.96, 2 RCTs, 22,000 women) [8]. The 2018 version of the review found that 1 g a day or more lowered high blood pressure (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.81) and preeclampsia (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.65), with a clear effect in women with low calcium diets (RR 0.36), and that preterm birth fell (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.97) [9]. An umbrella review of earlier meta-analyses reported a pooled RR for preeclampsia of 0.53 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.68, I² 84%) [10]. Calcium started before pregnancy did not change preeclampsia in 1,355 women with prior preeclampsia (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.14) [11].
Population
10 trials with 37,504 women [8]. 13 trials with 15,730 pregnant women [9]. 1,355 parous women in one trial [11].
Sources
[8], [9], [10], [11]
Caveats
The 2025 update removed 20 previously included trials, 11 because eligibility criteria changed and 9 that await classification over trustworthiness concerns. It was part-funded by WHO [8]. The umbrella review's search ended in December 2023, before those exclusions [10]. Heterogeneity was high in the 2018 review and small-study effects were possible. In its largest trial, preeclampsia fell only 8% and the interval included no effect [9].
D-aspartic acidModerateStudied in men

Testosterone

Mixed results: one 12-day trial found testosterone up 42% from baseline in untrained men, while trials in trained men found no rise or a fall at 6 g.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 23 men aged 27 to 37 given 3.12 g of sodium D-aspartate a day for 12 days, testosterone rose from 4.5 to 6.4 ng/mL, a 42% increase over baseline, and LH rose 33%. Twenty men on placebo did not change [1]. In resistance-trained men, 3 g a day for 28 days did not change total or free testosterone, LH or estradiol [2]. In 24 trained men over 14 days, 3 g a day had no effect, and 6 g a day lowered total and free testosterone [3]. In 22 trained men over 12 weeks, 6 g a day did not change total or free testosterone [4]. In 16 boxers at simulated altitude, 6 g a day for 14 days did not change resting testosterone or LH [5]. A systematic review of 4 human studies found the results inconsistent and the studies few and of poor quality [6].
Population
Healthy men in Italy [1]; resistance-trained men [2][3][4]; male boxers [5].
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]
Caveats
The rise in [1] was reported against the same men's baseline, and the product was a commercial preparation also containing vitamins B6, B12 and folic acid. All trials were small and lasted 2 to 12 weeks.
EstradiolModerateStudied in women

Fractures, stroke and breast cancer in trials of estrogen therapy after menopause

Mixed results: in one large trial estrogen alone cut fractures by 27% and raised strokes by 33% in postmenopausal women, with little or no difference in breast cancer.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A Cochrane review drew its main results from the Women's Health Initiative. Among 10,739 women who had had a hysterectomy, oral conjugated equine estrogen for an average of 7 years, against placebo, gave relative risks of 0.73 for all clinical fractures (95% CI 0.65 to 0.80), 1.33 for stroke (1.06 to 1.67), 1.78 for gallbladder disease requiring surgery (1.42 to 2.24), 0.94 for coronary events (0.78 to 1.13), 1.32 for venous clots (1.00 to 1.74) and 0.79 for breast cancer (0.61 to 1.01). Among 16,608 women with a uterus, estrogen with a progestin for 5.6 years gave 0.78 for fractures (0.71 to 0.86), 1.39 for stroke (1.09 to 2.09), 2.03 for venous clots (1.55 to 6.64) and 1.27 for breast cancer (1.03 to 1.56) [10].
Population
24 randomized trials with 45,660 women, most of them postmenopausal American women with a mean age over 60 [10].
Sources
[10], [7]
Caveats
A marker that tracks an outcome is not always one whose correction changes it. Higher estradiol went with more breast cancer in cohorts [7], and estrogen given alone did not raise it in this trial. The trials set a dose and did not target a blood level. The review's authors caution that the results rest on one study of oral therapy, and that only about 30% of the women were aged 50 to 59 [10].
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)ModerateStudied in women

Response to ovarian stimulation in IVF

Mixed results: raised early-cycle FSH is described as specific but not sensitive for low ovarian reserve, and no ovarian reserve test predicted ongoing pregnancy after IVF.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The American Society for Reproductive Medicine describes an elevated basal FSH, measured on day 2, 3 or 4 of the cycle, as a specific but not sensitive test for diminished ovarian reserve [8]. A meta-analysis of individual data from studies of FSH, anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count before IVF found that age alone predicted a poor response with an area under the curve of 0.61, and that anti-Müllerian hormone or the follicle count alone reached 0.78 and 0.76. For ongoing pregnancy, age was the single predictor (0.57) and none of the tests added to it [9].
Population
28 study databases with 5,705 women undergoing IVF [9].
Sources
[8], [9]
Caveats
The pooled analysis does not report in its abstract how FSH alone performed for a poor response. The committee opinion gives no FSH cut point [8].
Free T4 (free thyroxine)Moderate

Pregnancy and child outcomes

Mixed results: low free T4 in pregnancy was linked to lower child IQ and preterm birth, while a trial that treated low free T4 found no change in IQ.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a Dutch birth cohort, maternal free T4 in early pregnancy had an inverted U-shaped association with child IQ, with both low and high concentrations corresponding to a 1.4 to 3.8 point lower mean IQ [11]. In pooled data on 47,045 pregnant women, preterm birth occurred in 7.1% of women with a low free T4 and normal TSH against 5.0% of women with normal results (odds ratio 1.46, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.90) [12]. In a trial of 526 pregnant women with free T4 below 0.86 ng/dL and normal TSH, median child IQ was 94 with levothyroxine and 91 with placebo (P = 0.30), with no significant differences in other pregnancy or neonatal outcomes [6].
Population
3,839 mother and child pairs, with IQ tested at a median age of 6 [11]. 47,045 pregnant women in 19 cohorts [12]. 526 women randomized at a mean of 17.8 weeks of pregnancy [6].
Sources
[11], [12], [6]
Caveats
A marker that tracks an outcome is not always one whose correction changes it. The cohort findings are observational, and the trial began treatment between 8 and 20 weeks of pregnancy [6].
58 more
Free testosteroneModerate

Calculated free testosterone

Mixed results: calculated values tracked dialysis closely in two comparisons, while a study of 2,159 samples found common formulas overestimated it.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Equilibrium dialysis
Effect
Free testosterone calculated from total testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin was almost identical to the dialysis value under all conditions studied except pregnancy [17]. In 147 women, calculated values correlated with dialysis at r = 0.99, and the agreement depended strongly on the assays used for total testosterone and the binding globulin [14]. In 2,159 serum samples from men at one research laboratory, commonly used formulas significantly overestimated free testosterone against dialysis, while two newer empirical formulas were more concordant, and correcting for albumin, obesity, ethnicity or gonadal status did not change accuracy [19]. The Endocrine Society states that estimates from an allosteric model closely approximate dialysis values [1].
Population
Sera with varied binding globulin levels [17]. 147 women [14]. 2,159 samples from men [19].
Sources
[17], [14], [19], [1]
Caveats
A calculated value inherits the error of the total testosterone and binding globulin assays behind it [14]. The first comparison was run by the group whose formula it tested [17].
GnRH drugs for fibroidsModerateStudied in women

Fibroid pain and fibroid size: relugolix

Shown to ease fibroid pain and shrink the uterus against placebo. Relugolix combination therapy did not shrink the fibroids themselves, while relugolix alone did.

Compared with placebo [1][3]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Relugolix combination therapy improved pain, distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, and uterine volume against placebo, but not fibroid volume [1]. Pooled across 6 studies, myoma volume fell 28.50% more than on placebo and uterine volume also fell more (reported as -30.31, p = 0.0028), with higher odds of pain relief (OR 9.02). Relugolix alone shrank myomas and the uterus more than combination therapy [3].
Population
770 premenopausal women with fibroids [1]; 511 participants in 6 studies [3].
Sources
[1], [3]
Caveats
The pooled size results mix relugolix alone, which is not the US-approved form, with combination therapy [3].
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in women

Developing fibroids

Mixed results: current pill use was linked to less than half the fibroid risk of never use, while ever use was not significantly linked, in pooled observational studies.

Compared with women who never used the pill [26]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against never use, ever use of the pill was not significantly linked to fibroids (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.04), nor was former use (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.08). Current use was linked to lower risk (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.73), and 5 or more years of use to 17% lower risk [26].
Population
8,990 women with fibroids among 131,055 participants in 11 cohort and case-control studies [26].
Sources
[26]
Caveats
Observational, with heterogeneity of 64% to 92% [26]. Whether a woman is prescribed the pill can depend on symptoms that fibroids cause, so confounding and reverse causation are possible.
Hormonal birth controlModerateStudied in women

Excess hair and androgens in PCOS

Mixed results: against metformin, hair growth improved about the same in one review and more on the pill in overweight women in another.

Compared with metformin [36][37]; metformin combined with the pill [36][37]; placebo or lifestyle change [35]; other combined pills [38]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against metformin, hirsutism did not differ, while free androgen index was 7.08 lower, SHBG 118.61 nmol/L higher and testosterone 0.48 nmol/L lower on the pill. Adding metformin to the pill lowered free androgen index and raised SHBG further [36]. A Cochrane review found metformin may improve hirsutism less than the pill in women with BMI 25 to 30 (MD 1.92, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.64), with an uncertain difference at other BMIs, and the pill plus metformin improved hirsutism more than the pill alone [37]. Hirsutism did not differ from placebo or lifestyle change, at very low certainty [35]. Pills with cyproterone acetate lowered hirsutism and testosterone (MD 0.38 nmol/L) more than conventional pills, and high and low estrogen doses did not differ [38].
Population
36 RCTs in women with PCOS [36]; 44 RCTs with 2,253 women and adolescents with PCOS [37]; 4 RCTs [35]; 19 RCTs comparing two pills [38].
Sources
[36], [37], [35], [38]
Caveats
Cochrane evidence quality was very low to low [37]. The guideline reviewers noted the higher clot risk of cyproterone acetate pills in the general population [38].
Hypnotherapy and clinical hypnosisModerateStudied in pregnancy

Labor pain

Mixed results: women taught hypnosis used pain medication less often, and satisfaction with pain relief, coping and spontaneous birth did not differ from control groups.

Compared with standard care, supportive counseling and relaxation training [17]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Women in the hypnosis groups were less likely to use pain medication (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.94, 8 trials, 2,916 women), with no difference in epidural use, sense of coping (MD 0.22) or spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 1.12). Against standard care or relaxation, primary outcomes did not differ. Against supportive counseling, pain medication use was lower (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.73, 2 trials) [17].
Population
2,954 women in 9 trials [17].
Sources
[17]
Caveats
Evidence for the main comparison was rated low quality, with heterogeneity that could not be explained [17].
InositolModerateStudied in women

Fertility treatment in PCOS

Mixed results: one review found higher clinical pregnancy rates in women with PCOS in fertility treatment, and a larger review found no effect.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 17 intervention studies of women with PCOS undergoing assisted reproduction, myo-inositol or D-chiro-inositol raised the clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.15) and top-grade embryos (RR 1.12), and lowered antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone [8]. In 11 studies (981 women undergoing IVF), myo-inositol raised the mature (MII) oocyte rate (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.31) and the fertilization rate (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.16). The MII oocyte rate did not rise in poor responders [9]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 39 studies found fewer irregular periods on myo-inositol (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89) and no significant effect on clinical pregnancy rate [10].
Population
Women with PCOS in assisted reproduction [8][10]. Women undergoing IVF, with and without PCOS [9].
Sources
[8], [9], [10]
Caveats
The reviews disagree on clinical pregnancy [8][10]. None of the abstracts reports live births for inositol. Heterogeneity was high for several outcomes [8][10].
IodineModerateStudied in pregnancy

Thyroid function in pregnancy

Mixed results: reviews agree iodine lowered maternal thyroglobulin in pregnancy, but disagree on whether TSH changed.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Most studies found no effect on maternal or infant TSH or free thyroxine. Most RCTs found lower maternal thyroglobulin, and 3 found less growth in thyroid volume [3]. Cochrane found no clear difference in hypothyroidism in pregnancy or postpartum and postpartum hyperthyroidism fell (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.91, 3 trials, 543 women) [5]. A 2026 meta-analysis found lower TSH (SMD -0.14, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.05) and lower thyroglobulin (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.13) with supplementation, with larger TSH drops at 200 to 300 µg a day [6].
Population
37 publications in mildly to moderately deficient women [3]; 14 trials, 11 contributing data from over 2,700 women [5]; iodine-deficient pregnant women in English and Chinese studies [6].
Sources
[3], [5], [6]
Caveats
Cochrane rated the evidence low or very low quality and found the data insufficient for meaningful conclusions [5]. The reviews agree on lower thyroglobulin and differ on TSH [3][6]. The 2026 abstract does not give the number of studies or women [6].
LevothyroxineModerate

Pregnancy outcomes with subclinical hypothyroidism or thyroid antibodies

Mixed results: fewer preterm and low birth weight births in one review, lower miscarriage in women with thyroid antibodies, and no difference in an NIH trial.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In randomized trials of women with subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy, levothyroxine was associated with less preterm birth (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.77) and fewer low birth weight infants (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.89). Small for gestational age and macrosomia did not differ [5]. In euthyroid pregnant women with thyroid peroxidase antibodies, miscarriage was lower (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.98), while preterm birth (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.13) and live birth (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.12) did not differ [6]. In subclinical hypothyroidism, gestational hypertension (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.25) and pre-eclampsia (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.58) did not differ from controls [7].
Population
30 RCTs and cohort studies with 18,568 pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism [5]; 8 RCTs with 1,645 women [6]; trials and observational studies in pregnant women with subclinical or overt hypothyroidism or thyroid autoimmunity [7].
Sources
[5], [6], [7]
Caveats
[5] pooled RCTs with cohort studies, and the figures above are its RCT estimates. Preterm birth fell in [5] but not in [6], which studied a different group. The NIH trial of treatment from mid-pregnancy found no difference in pregnancy outcomes [8].
MetforminModerateStudied in women

Excess hair and androgens in PCOS

Mixed results: against the pill, hair growth improved about the same in one review and less in overweight women in another. Metformin lowered testosterone against placebo.

Compared with combined oral contraceptive pills [35][36]; metformin combined with the pill [36]; placebo [31]; lifestyle change with or without placebo [33]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Hirsutism did not differ between metformin and combined oral contraceptive pills, while free androgen index was 7.08 higher, SHBG 118.61 nmol/L lower and testosterone 0.48 nmol/L higher on metformin than on the pill [35]. In a Cochrane review, metformin may improve hirsutism less than the pill in women with BMI 25 to 30 (MD 1.92, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.64, 5 RCTs, 254 women), with an uncertain difference at other BMIs. Metformin alone and the pill alone each improved hirsutism less than the two combined [36]. Against placebo, metformin lowered total testosterone (SMD -0.33, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.17) [31]. Lifestyle change plus metformin did not differ from lifestyle change on clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism, while metformin alone gave lower testosterone than lifestyle change [33].
Population
36 RCTs in women with PCOS [35]; 44 RCTs with 2,253 women and adolescents with PCOS [36]; 24 RCTs with 564 women given metformin [31]; 12 RCTs with 608 women [33].
Sources
[35], [36], [31], [33]
Caveats
Cochrane evidence quality was very low to low [36]. Hirsutism scales and trial lengths varied.
Physical activityModerateStudied in women

Fewer fibroids with more physical activity

Mixed results: more intense physical activity was linked to about 14% lower odds of fibroids, while regular activity overall was not significantly linked, in pooled observational studies.

Compared with women who did not regularly do physical activity [22]; women doing less intense activity [22]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 8 studies, women who regularly did physical activity did not differ significantly in their odds of having fibroids from women who did not (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.05, I² 77.6%). Across 5 studies, women doing more intense activity had lower odds than women doing less intense activity (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99, I² 80.5%). The largest study, a retrospective cohort of Korean women, found a small rise in fibroids with regular exercise [22].
Population
Women in 15 studies (3 cross-sectional, 6 case-control and 6 cohort), 11 of them pooled, published 1986 to 2024 [22].
Sources
[22]
Caveats
Observational, with high heterogeneity. The reviewers rated the evidence low quality for imprecision and risk of bias [22]. Active women differ in body weight and other habits, and fibroid symptoms such as heavy bleeding and pain can limit activity, so confounding and reverse causation are possible.
Progestins for endometriosis and heavy bleedingModerateStudied in women

Endometriosis pain, compared with combined birth control pills

Mixed results: pooled trials found no clear difference in pelvic pain between progestin and combined birth control pills in women with endometriosis. Another review's results varied by pain type.

Compared with combined oral contraceptives [5][12]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pelvic pain did not differ between oral progestins and combined pills (MD 0.38, 95% CI -0.46 to 1.22, moderate certainty), and side effects overall did not differ (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.60). Pain-related quality of life was higher with progestins (SF-36 pain MD 11.5, 95% CI 2.35 to 20.65, low certainty) [5]. In another review of 8 trials, dienogest lowered overall pain scores more than a drospirenone pill (SMD -1.66, 95% CI -3.16 to -0.15), but eased pelvic pain (SMD 0.42) and pain during sex (SMD 0.70) less than combined pills. Side effects did not differ, except more hand numbness and weight gain on the pills [12].
Population
Women with endometriosis in 4 trials [5] and 8 trials [12].
Sources
[5], [12]
Caveats
Few small trials, and the certainty for most outcomes was low or very low [5].
Progestins for endometriosis and heavy bleedingModerateStudied in women

Heavy menstrual bleeding: cyclical progestin tablets

Mixed results: no trial compared cyclical progestins with placebo. Taken for 21 days a cycle, they reduced blood loss in women less than a hormonal IUD, tranexamic acid or ormeloxifene.

Compared with tranexamic acid, danazol and a progesterone-releasing IUD, for short courses [15]; a levonorgestrel IUD, tranexamic acid, ormeloxifene and the combined vaginal ring, for long courses [15]

The numbers and sources
Effect
No trial compared progestins with placebo. Short courses of medroxyprogesterone acetate or norethisterone for 7 to 10 days in the second half of the cycle reduced blood loss less than other medicines (MD 37.29, 95% CI 17.67 to 56.91, 6 trials, 145 women), with more bleeding days. Courses from day 5 to day 26 reduced blood loss less than a levonorgestrel IUD, tranexamic acid or ormeloxifene, and may be similar to the combined vaginal ring (MD 16.88, 95% CI 10.93 to 22.84, 4 trials, 355 women). Breast tenderness and bleeding between periods were more likely with the levonorgestrel IUD [15].
Population
1,071 women with heavy menstrual bleeding in 15 trials [15].
Sources
[15]
Caveats
Most women knew their treatment, and the reviewers rated the evidence low or very low in quality. The abstract gives no units for the blood loss differences [15].
Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG)ModerateStudied in women

Breast cancer

Shown in a genetic study to go with 6% less breast cancer overall per 25 nmol/L higher SHBG, and with more estrogen receptor negative disease.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a Mendelian randomization analysis, each 25 nmol/L of genetically higher SHBG had an odds ratio of 0.94 for breast cancer overall (95% CI 0.90 to 0.98), 0.92 for estrogen receptor positive disease (0.87 to 0.97) and 1.09 for estrogen receptor negative disease (1.00 to 1.18) [11]. In pooled prospective studies of postmenopausal women, higher SHBG was associated with a decrease in breast cancer risk (P for trend 0.041) [12].
Population
122,977 breast cancer cases and 105,974 controls in genome-wide data [11]. 663 postmenopausal women who developed breast cancer and 1,765 who did not [12].
Sources
[11], [12]
Caveats
The genetic study's authors describe the finding for estrogen receptor negative disease as new and in need of further investigation [11]. Genetic estimates describe lifelong differences.
Soy foodsModerateStudied in women

Hot flashes in menopause

Mixed results: two reviews found soy isoflavones, mostly as extracts, cut hot flashes by about 20% or one a day, while a Cochrane review found no conclusive evidence in women.

Compared with placebo [6][8]; placebo or control groups in randomized trials [7]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Extracted or synthesized soy isoflavones (median 54 mg a day) for 6 weeks to 12 months reduced hot flash frequency by 20.6% (95% CI -28.38 to -12.86) and severity by 26.2% against placebo, with high heterogeneity [6]. Dietary and supplemental soy isoflavones were linked to fewer daily hot flashes (mean difference -0.79, 95% CI -1.35 to -0.23) and less vaginal dryness [7]. A Cochrane review of 43 trials found no conclusive evidence that phytoestrogens reduce hot flashes or night sweats, noted a placebo response of 1% to 59%, and found extracts high in genistein (over 30 mg a day) consistently reduced hot flashes in four trials [8].
Population
Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women in 17 trials [6], 62 studies of 6,653 women [7] and 43 trials of 4,364 women [8].
Sources
[6], [7], [8]
Caveats
Most trials tested extracts or supplements, not soy foods, and dietary soy trials could not be pooled [8]. In one review 74% of trials had a high risk of bias in three or more areas [7].
TENSModerateStudied in women

Period pain, compared with sham TENS

Mixed results: one review of sham-controlled trials found TENS eased period pain in women, while another found pain scores did not differ but fewer women needed pain pills.

Compared with sham TENS [2]; placebo TENS [3]; sham or placebo TENS in most trials, a placebo pill in one and usual NSAID use in one [4]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 4 trials that all used sham TENS, pain was lower with TENS (SMD 1.384, 95% CI 0.505 to 2.262) [2]. In 9 trials against placebo, fewer women needed pain medicine (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.63, moderate quality) and relief lasted longer, while pooled pain intensity did not differ (SMD -4.50, 95% CI -9.90 to 0.91) [3]. Across 13 trials, mostly against sham, pain scores were lower with TENS (MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.13 to -0.81, 8 trials, 398 women, I² 90%), fewer ibuprofen tablets were taken (MD -1.29, 95% CI -2.54 to -0.05), and scores for pain's effect on daily life did not differ (MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.40) [4].
Population
260 women with primary dysmenorrhea in 4 trials [2]. 530 women in 9 trials [3]. 779 women and girls aged 15 to 29 in 13 trials [4].
Sources
[2], [3], [4]
Caveats
Trials were small, heterogeneity was very high, and the reviews included different trials [3][4]. TENS produces a tingling that a sham device does not fully copy, so blinding may be imperfect.
TENSModerateStudied in pregnancy

Labor pain

Mixed results: a Cochrane review found little difference in labor pain ratings with TENS, while a later review of 26 trials found a small reduction in pain intensity.

Compared with routine care, other pain relief methods or placebo devices [6]; control groups the abstract does not describe [7]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 19 trials, pain ratings differed little between TENS and control groups. Women given TENS on acupuncture points were less likely to report severe pain (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.55). Added to an epidural, TENS did not reduce pain, and it had no consistent effect on interventions or outcomes in labor. Most women who used TENS said they would use it again [6]. A later review found a small pooled reduction in pain intensity (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.70) [7].
Population
1,671 women in labor in 19 trials, 15 with electrodes on the back [6]. 3,348 women in labor in 26 trials [7].
Sources
[6], [7]
Caveats
Most trials in the later review had a high risk of bias [7]. Use at home in early labor has not been studied [6].
Thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO antibodies)Moderate

Live birth and miscarriage in trials of levothyroxine for antibody-positive women

Mixed results: two large trials of levothyroxine in antibody-positive women with normal thyroid function found no change in live births or miscarriage, after small earlier trials reported fewer miscarriages.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a placebo-controlled trial of 952 women with TPO antibodies, normal thyroid function and a history of miscarriage or infertility, the live-birth rate was 37.4% with levothyroxine 50 micrograms a day and 37.9% with placebo (relative risk 0.97, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.14), with no significant differences in pregnancy loss or preterm birth [12]. In an open-label trial of 600 antibody-positive women having in vitro fertilization, miscarriage rates were 10.3% with levothyroxine and 10.6% without, and live-birth rates 31.7% and 32.3% [13]. Earlier, a pooled estimate from two small randomized studies gave a relative risk of miscarriage of 0.48 (0.25 to 0.92) [10]. In one earlier study, 115 antibody-positive pregnant women were divided into a levothyroxine group and an untreated group, with miscarriage in 3.5% and 13.8% [14].
Population
952 women at 49 UK hospitals, drawn from 19,585 tested [12]. 600 women at one hospital in China [13]. 115 antibody-positive pregnant women in Italy [14].
Sources
[12], [13], [10], [14]
Caveats
These trials treated women who had the antibodies and did not set out to lower the antibody level. The largest trial started treatment before conception and the Chinese trial was open label [12][13].
Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)Moderate

Pregnancy and child outcomes

Mixed results: raised TSH in pregnancy was linked to more preterm birth, while a levothyroxine trial found no difference in child IQ or pregnancy outcomes.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In pooled data on 47,045 pregnant women, preterm birth occurred in 6.1% of women with a raised TSH and normal free T4 against 5.0% of women with normal results (odds ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.64). Each standard deviation higher TSH had an odds ratio of 1.04 (1.00 to 1.09) [27]. In a trial of 677 pregnant women with TSH of 4.00 mU/L or more and normal free T4, the median child IQ score was 97 with levothyroxine and 94 with placebo (P = 0.71), with no significant differences in other pregnancy or neonatal outcomes [28].
Population
47,045 pregnant women in 19 cohorts, median 12.9 weeks at blood sampling [27]. 677 women randomized at a mean of 16.7 weeks of pregnancy [28].
Sources
[27], [28]
Caveats
The cohort finding is observational. The trial began treatment between 8 and 20 weeks of pregnancy, so it does not describe earlier treatment [28].
Total testosteroneModerate

Immunoassays against mass spectrometry

Mixed results: immunoassays separated low from normal levels in men, read up to 99 ng/dL apart from mass spectrometry, and overread women's samples by 46% on average.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Liquid or gas chromatography with mass spectrometry
Effect
In samples from 62 men with normal and 60 men with low testosterone, six immunoassay methods correlated with mass spectrometry at 0.92 to 0.97, and with most methods over 60% of results in the adult male range fell within 20% of it. One automated assay read a mean 90 ng/dL lower and another 99 ng/dL higher. The authors concluded the assays can tell normal from low levels in men when each laboratory sets its own reference range, and cannot accurately measure the levels found in women [29]. Across 10 immunoassays, 7 overestimated testosterone in women's samples, with mean results 46% above mass spectrometry, and results in men averaged 12% below it [13]. In a later accuracy survey, 142 laboratories using 16 immunoassays and mass spectrometry methods measured four donor sera. Bias ran from -17.8% to 73.1% at a target of 15.5 ng/dL and from -22.1% to 6.8% at 498 ng/dL, and 73% of laboratories had at least 3 of 4 results within 25.1% of the target [30].
Population
122 men [29]. 50 men, 55 women and 11 children [13]. 142 clinical laboratories certified by New York State [30].
Sources
[29], [13], [30]
Caveats
The two assay comparisons date from 2003 and 2004, so the assays may since have changed. The Endocrine Society states that harmonized reference ranges apply only to assays certified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2].
Total testosteroneModerateStudied in women

Diagnosing raised androgens in polycystic ovary syndrome

Shown in one meta-analysis to pick out women with PCOS with 74% sensitivity and 86% specificity, more specifically by mass spectrometry than by direct immunoassay.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
PCOS diagnosed by the Rotterdam, NIH or Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria, against women without PCOS
Effect
Across 18 studies, total testosterone had a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.82), specificity of 0.86 (0.77 to 0.91) and area under the curve of 0.87 (0.84 to 0.90) for the raised androgens of PCOS. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry gave higher specificity than direct immunoassay. Calculated free testosterone and the free androgen index performed about as well, and androstenedione and DHEAS were less specific [32]. The 2023 international PCOS guideline names total and free testosterone as the first tests for raised androgens, measured by mass spectrometry, and states that direct immunoassays have limited accuracy and poor sensitivity and precision for this use. It notes that the combined pill raises SHBG and lowers androgen production, which makes testing in women taking it unreliable [33].
Population
2,857 participants, 1,650 with PCOS and 1,207 controls, in 18 studies, with mean ages of 16 to 34.5 [32].
Sources
[32], [33]
Caveats
Raised androgens are one of the criteria that define PCOS, so the test is partly measured against a diagnosis it helps make [33]. Studies used different cut-offs, and the authors call for cut-offs set in large, unselected and ethnically diverse groups. Mean body mass index ran from 22.4 to 37.6 in women with PCOS and from 20.2 to 32.7 in controls [32].
Total testosteroneModerate

Sexual function in women

Mixed results: women's testosterone levels did not track sexual function in one survey, while testosterone treatment improved sexual function in trials of postmenopausal women.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a community survey of 1,021 Australian women aged 18 to 75, no clinically significant relationship was found between a low score in any domain of sexual function and a low total or free testosterone, and the authors concluded that no single androgen level predicts low sexual function [25]. In a meta-analysis of 36 randomized trials, testosterone treatment in postmenopausal women increased satisfactory sexual events (mean difference 0.85, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.18) and sexual desire (standardized mean difference 0.36, 0.22 to 0.50). Acne and hair growth were more likely, and oral testosterone raised LDL cholesterol [26].
Population
1,021 women drawn at random from the electoral roll in Victoria, Australia [25]. 8,480 participants in 36 trials of at least 12 weeks [26].
Sources
[25], [26]
Caveats
The survey is cross-sectional. The trials tested treatment in women with low sexual desire, not a blood level, and the authors call for study of long-term effects [26].
TribulusModerateStudied in men

Erectile function

Mixed results: a meta-analysis found erectile function scores about 3 points higher than placebo in men with erectile dysfunction, while one small trial found no change.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A meta-analysis of 8 studies found tribulus raised IIEF-5 by 3.23 points (95% CI 1.89 to 4.58) and IIEF-15 by 14.44 points (95% CI 5.75 to 23.14) more than placebo [6]. A systematic review found improvement in 3 of the 5 studies that measured erectile function, at 400 to 750 mg a day for 1 to 3 months, and rated the evidence low [7]. In 180 men with mild or moderate erectile dysfunction, Tribestan at six 250 mg tablets a day for 12 weeks raised the IIEF score 2.70 points more than placebo (95% CI 1.40 to 4.01), with gains in intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function, sexual desire and overall satisfaction [8]. In 30 men aged 40 or older, 800 mg a day for 30 days did not change IIEF-5 compared with placebo (p = 0.79) [3].
Population
Men with erectile dysfunction in RCTs [6][7]; men aged 18 to 65 in Bulgaria [8]; 30 men in Brazil [3].
Sources
[6], [7], [3], [8]
Caveats
Single trials disagree [3][8]. Half the studies in the 2025 review had low methodological quality by Jadad score [7]. The larger trial tested a branded extract made by Sopharma AD, and its funding is not stated in the abstract [8]. Doses and durations differed.
Uterine fibroid proceduresModerate

Embolization compared with surgery: satisfaction and quality of life

Mixed results: satisfaction after embolization matched hysterectomy or myomectomy up to 5 years, but fibroid quality of life scores were lower than after myomectomy at 2 years.

Compared with hysterectomy or myomectomy [5]; myomectomy [6][7]; hysterectomy [4]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Satisfaction did not differ between embolization and surgery within 24 months (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.48, 6 trials, 640 women) or at 5 years (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.80, 2 trials, 295 women) [5]. In the FEMME trial, fibroid quality of life scores at 2 years were 84.6 after myomectomy and 80.0 after embolization (adjusted difference 8.0 points, 95% CI 1.8 to 14.1), and 5.0 points at 4 years (95% CI -1.4 to 11.5), not significant [6]. A meta-analysis found higher symptom severity scores after embolization than myomectomy at 4 years [7]. At 10 years, quality of life did not differ between embolization and hysterectomy [4].
Population
7 RCTs with 793 women [5]; 254 UK women randomized to myomectomy or embolization [6]; 13 studies, 4 of them randomized [7]; 177 Dutch women [4].
Sources
[5], [6], [7], [4]
Caveats
Many eligible women in FEMME declined to be randomized because they preferred one treatment [6]. Nine of the 13 studies in [7] were observational.
Vitamin DModerate

Pregnancy outcomes

Mixed results: in pregnancy, one review found lower gestational diabetes and 53 g higher birth weight, while reviews disagree on preeclampsia and preterm birth.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 66 trials (17,276 participants, median dose 2,000 IU a day), vitamin D in pregnancy did not change preeclampsia (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.53, 6 trials), lowered gestational diabetes (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.86, 12 trials) and raised birth weight by 53 g (95% CI 16 to 90). Preterm birth, small for gestational age and low birth weight did not change [30]. An umbrella analysis of 35 studies (188,370 participants) found lower gestational diabetes (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88), preeclampsia (RR 0.62), preterm delivery (RR 0.77), low birth weight (RR 0.67), stillbirth (RR 0.77) and neonatal death (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84) [31].
Population
Pregnant women in RCTs of 400 to 60,000 IU [30]; pregnant women in pooled meta-analyses [31].
Sources
[30], [31]
Caveats
The two reviews disagree on preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight. In the 66-trial review, 25 trials had at least one domain at high risk of bias and heterogeneity was high [30]. The umbrella analysis pooled published meta-analyses, which share trials [31].
Vitamin DModerateStudied in women

Endometriosis pain

Mixed results: three reviews found no significant drop in endometriosis pain on vitamin D, while one found less period pain in its vitamin D trials.

Compared with placebo [64][65][66][67]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pain did not fall significantly in the 3 trials of secondary dysmenorrhea [64] or in the registered endometriosis trials [65]. A review of 13 RCTs found vitamin D lowered pelvic pain in endometriosis, a difference that was not significant against placebo [66]. A review of antioxidant supplements found less endometriosis-related period pain in the vitamin D trials (SMD -0.59, 95% CI -1.13 to -0.06, I² 70%) [67].
Population
3 RCTs in secondary dysmenorrhea [64]; registered RCTs in endometriosis [65]; 13 RCTs with 589 women with endometriosis [66]; 10 RCTs of antioxidant supplements in endometriosis [67].
Sources
[64], [65], [66], [67]
Caveats
Trials were few and small, and heterogeneity was high [67].
Vitamin EModerateStudied in women

Period pain

Mixed results: two reviews found vitamin E lowered period pain more than placebo, while a Cochrane review of two trials found no difference.

Compared with placebo [16][17]; placebo or no treatment [18]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 8 RCTs, vitamin E lowered primary dysmenorrhea pain more than placebo in the first month (SMD -1.16, 95% CI -2.16 to -0.17) and the second month (SMD -1.83, 95% CI -2.90 to -0.77), with no serious side effects reported [16]. A review of micronutrients found lower pain on vitamin E than placebo (SMD -0.47, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.20) [17]. A Cochrane review found no difference on a 0 to 10 pain scale (MD 0.00 points, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.34, 2 RCTs, 135 women) [18].
Population
8 RCTs with 1,002 women with primary dysmenorrhea [16]; 16 trials with 1,871 participants aged 13 to 40, 4 of them of vitamin E [17]; 27 RCTs with 3,101 women, mostly students in their late teens or early twenties [18].
Sources
[16], [17], [18]
Caveats
Heterogeneity was high in the second month (I² 76%) [16]. The Cochrane review rated all its evidence low or very low quality, and most trials were from Iran [18]. The reviews included different trials.
BerberineLimitedStudied in women

PCOS

Limited evidence: all 4 PCOS trials were rated at high risk of compromised integrity, so their reported improvements were judged not reliable.

The numbers and sources
Effect
An integrity-based systematic review found 4 RCTs of berberine in polycystic ovary syndrome. All four were rated at high risk of compromised integrity, with absent trial registration, implausible recruitment timelines and possible duplicated data, so none was pooled. The reported improvements in insulin resistance, lipids and androgen markers were judged not reliable [7].
Population
452 women with polycystic ovary syndrome, now also called polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
Trial authors did not answer requests for clarification [7]. The abstract does not name the four trials, so it does not show whether the PCOS trial in [6] was among them.
BoronLimitedStudied in men

Testosterone

Small trials found opposite results: 2.5 mg a day did not change testosterone in bodybuilders, while 10 mg a day for a week raised free testosterone in 8 men.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Sources disagree. Over 7 weeks, 2.5 mg a day did not change total or free testosterone against placebo. Testosterone rose in both groups with training [1]. After one week of 10 mg a day, mean free testosterone rose, estradiol fell, and dihydrotestosterone rose [2].
Population
19 male bodybuilders aged 20 to 27 [1]; 8 healthy men [2].
Sources
[1], [2]
Caveats
Both studies are small. In [2], placebo was given on one day only, the one-week result compares each man with his own baseline, and the abstract gives no effect sizes.
BoronLimitedStudied in women

Bone and calcium balance in women

Small trials found opposite results: one found 3 mg a day lowered urinary calcium in postmenopausal women, while another found no effect. No fracture outcomes were studied.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Sources disagree. Adding 3 mg a day to a low-boron diet lowered urinary calcium and magnesium and raised serum estradiol and testosterone [3]. A later study using 3 mg a day after a low-boron diet found no effect on minerals, sex steroids or markers of bone breakdown [4]. Over one year in female college students, boron changed serum phosphorus and magnesium. The abstract reports bone density by activity group, not by supplement [5].
Population
12 postmenopausal women aged 48 to 82 in a metabolic unit [3]; healthy postmenopausal women in a metabolic unit [4]; 17 athletes and 11 sedentary women [5].
Sources
[3], [4], [5]
Caveats
Tiny studies, mostly measuring blood and urine markers over weeks. No fracture outcomes.
Coenzyme Q10LimitedStudied in women

IVF outcomes in women with poor ovarian response

One trial found CoQ10 with folic acid raised egg counts in 100 women with poor ovarian response, but pregnancy rates did not differ.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 100 women with poor ovarian response, CoQ10 plus folic acid before and during an ICSI cycle raised oocyte count and antral follicle count against folic acid alone. Chemical and clinical pregnancy rates did not differ [24].
Population
100 women classified as poor ovarian responders [24].
Sources
[24]
Caveats
One trial without a placebo. Pregnancy rates did not differ [24].
DHEA sulfate (DHEA-S)Limited

Immunoassays against mass spectrometry

One comparison found three of seven DHEA-S immunoassays agreed well with mass spectrometry, and four had slopes of 0.84 to 1.28 against it.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
Effect
Seven commercial assays each measured the same 75 serum samples. Three agreed well with mass spectrometry, with correlations of 0.93 to 0.99 and slopes of 0.92 to 1.07. Four showed standardization problems, with slopes of 0.84, 1.14, 1.20 and 1.28. One assay had a within-run coefficient of variation of 18%. The findings agreed with Dutch, German and British external quality schemes [13].
Population
75 serum samples spanning 0.06 to 20.6 µmol/L by mass spectrometry [13].
Sources
[13]
Caveats
One comparison from 2013, so the assays may since have changed.
DHEA sulfate (DHEA-S)Limited

Variation from one test to the next

Small studies found DHEA-S varied about 9% within a man over 10 weeks and about 20% within a woman over a year.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same person's earlier results
Effect
In 38 men sampled weekly for 10 weeks, the within-person variation of DHEA-S was 9% [14]. In 21 women sampled monthly for a year, it was 20% within a woman and 49% between women, with a seasonal cycle [15]. In men sampled up to six times over 6 months, the within-person variation of eleven hormone measures, DHEA-S among them, implied that two measurements would differ by more than 18% to 28% about half the time [16].
Population
38 men in the European Biological Variation Study [14]. 21 women [15]. 132 men aged 30 to 79 in Boston [16].
Sources
[14], [15], [16]
Caveats
Small studies. The last figure covers all eleven hormone measures, and the abstract does not give DHEA-S alone [16].
EstradiolLimitedStudied in men

Variation from one test to the next in men

Limited evidence: two hormone results from the same man differed by more than 18% to 28% about half the time, across eleven hormone measures that included estradiol.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same man's earlier result
Effect
In men sampled up to six times over 6 months, the within-person variation of eleven hormone measures, estradiol among them, implied that two measurements would differ by more than 18% to 28% about half the time and by more than 27% to 54% about a quarter of the time, depending on the hormone. Day to day biological variation accounted for more of the total than assay variation [14].
Population
132 men aged 30 to 79 in Boston, 121 of whom completed all six visits [14].
Sources
[14]
Caveats
The percentage ranges cover all eleven hormone measures, and the abstract does not give the figure for estradiol alone [14].
FerritinLimitedStudied in women

Heavy menstrual bleeding

Limited evidence: heavier menstrual loss went with lower ferritin in Northern European but not East Asian women, and half of adolescents referred for heavy periods had low ferritin.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In healthy premenopausal women of genetically confirmed ancestry, a higher menstrual blood loss score went with lower serum ferritin (β -0.01 on the log scale, P = 0.004), lower total body iron and higher soluble transferrin receptor in women of Northern European ancestry, and with none of these in women of East Asian ancestry [20]. Of 114 young women referred to a US hematology clinic for heavy menstrual bleeding, 50.9% had ferritin below 20 ng/mL, and fewer than half of those were anemic [21]. In an Australian screening study of active women, 51 of the 104 who had follow-up iron tests (about 49%) had ferritin below 30 ng/mL, and women reporting a history of iron deficiency were more likely to report heavy menstrual bleeding, 36.9% of them [22].
Population
Premenopausal women aged 18 to 50 with a body mass index of 18 to 30 in the FeGenes study [20]. 114 girls and young women aged 9 to 19 [21]. 1,042 active women aged 18 to 65 [22].
Sources
[20], [21], [22]
Caveats
Observational and cross-sectional. Menstrual loss was scored from questionnaires, not measured, and the referred adolescents had no comparison group without heavy bleeding [20][21]. In the screening study, only women with low or borderline hemoglobin had iron tests [22]. The FeGenes abstract does not give the number of women [20].
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)Limited

Between assays and laboratories

Limited evidence: FSH immunoassays varied by under 12% on shared samples, while the upper limit US laboratories reported for men ran from 7.9 to 20.0.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Other immunoassays measuring the same serum pools, and other laboratories' reference ranges
Effect
When 16 Italian laboratories measured 5 serum pools with five automated immunoassays and one radioimmunoassay, the variance for FSH was below 12%. Two assays read higher than the others and two lower, and reference ranges at the low end varied widely, even among laboratories using the same assay [15]. In a survey of 117 US laboratories, the upper limit of the reference range reported for men ran from 7.9 to 20.0. Seventy percent of the ranges came from checking the maker's package insert values, in 20 to 200 samples [16]. In one study the same women's follicular samples gave an interval of 4.07 to 12.9 mIU/mL on one platform and 3.75 to 14.2 on another [3].
Population
16 laboratories [15]. 117 US laboratories [16]. 139 women [3].
Sources
[15], [16], [3], [8]
Caveats
The survey's abstract gives no unit for its limits [16]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine states that correlation among FSH assays is high but absolute values can differ [8].
Free testosteroneLimitedStudied in men

Variation after glucose and from one test to the next

Limited evidence: free testosterone fell after a glucose drink in one study, and repeat hormone results in one man often differed by a fifth or more.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same man's fasting or earlier sample
Effect
In 74 men given a 75 g oral glucose load, total and calculated free testosterone both fell significantly, with total testosterone down 25% [20]. In 132 men sampled up to six times over 6 months, within-person variation across eleven hormone measures, free testosterone among them, implied that two results would differ by more than 18 to 28% about half the time, depending on the hormone [21].
Population
74 men aged 19 to 74 [20]. 132 men aged 30 to 79 in Boston [21].
Sources
[20], [21]
Caveats
Neither abstract gives the size of the change for free testosterone alone [20][21].
Free testosteroneLimitedStudied in men

Outcomes in trials that raised testosterone

Limited evidence: the large testosterone treatment trials enrolled men by total testosterone, so they do not show what correcting a low free testosterone alone does.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A trial of 790 men aged 65 or older enrolled on a total testosterone below 275 ng/dL and found improved sexual function with no benefit for vitality or walking distance [15]. A trial of 5,246 men enrolled on two fasting total testosterone levels below 300 ng/dL and found no difference in major cardiac events (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.17) [16]. The American Urological Association states that total and free testosterone are not interchangeable and that no clear data point to consistent thresholds between the two below which symptoms appear and above which treatment benefits occur [3].
Population
790 men treated for 1 year [15]. 5,246 men aged 45 to 80, mean follow-up 33.0 months [16].
Sources
[15], [16], [3]
Caveats
A marker that tracks an outcome is not always one whose correction changes it. Neither trial reports results by free testosterone level in its abstract.
GingerLimitedStudied in women

Heavy menstrual bleeding

Small trials found mixed results: one found ginger cut menstrual blood loss more than placebo in teenage girls, another found no difference in amount added to ibuprofen.

Compared with placebo capsules [14]; ibuprofen with placebo [15]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 92 high school girls whose heavy bleeding was confirmed on a pictorial blood loss chart over 3 cycles, blood loss fell more on ginger capsules than on placebo over the next 3 cycles (P < 0.001), and few adverse effects were reported. The abstract gives no effect size or dose [14]. In 102 women with heavy bleeding, all given ibuprofen 200 mg, adding 300 mg of ginger 3 times a day for the first 7 days of 2 cycles shortened bleeding by 1.8 days, against 0.52 days with placebo. The amount of bleeding fell in every group, with no difference between groups, and quality of life improved more with ginger than placebo [15].
Population
92 high school girls with heavy periods [14]; 102 women of reproductive age with heavy periods, one third given frankincense instead [15].
Sources
[14], [15]
Caveats
Two small trials over 2 to 3 cycles. In [15] every group also took ibuprofen, and the change in bleeding days was tested within each group. The abstract of [14] gives no effect size.
HemoglobinLimitedStudied in women

Uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding

Mixed results: anemia was coded in a third of women with fibroids and heavy bleeding in US claims, while a screening study found self-reported heavy bleeding did not predict anemia.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In US insurance claims, anemia was recorded in the following year in 32.0% and 35.3% of women with fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding (grouped by which was diagnosed first), 14.3% of women with fibroids alone and 4.4% of age-matched women with neither [20]. In screening events in the UK and Australia, where anemia was a finger-prick hemoglobin below 12.0 g/dL, self-reported heavy menstrual bleeding did not significantly predict anemia in a model that included country and age (adjusted odds ratio 1.19, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.60), while living in the UK did [21]. In an Australian screening study of active women, those reporting a history of anemia were more likely to report heavy menstrual bleeding, 39.7% of them [22].
Population
22,057 women aged 18 to 55 in each of three fibroid groups and 110,285 controls, mean age 43.5 [20]. 1,937 women aged 15 to 50 [21]. 1,042 active women aged 18 to 65, 887 with a finger-prick hemoglobin [22].
Sources
[20], [21], [22]
Caveats
Observational. Claims record a diagnosis of anemia, not a hemoglobin value [20]. Heavy bleeding was self-reported in the screening studies, and finger-prick hemoglobin can differ from a venous draw (see Finger-prick and point-of-care testing) [21][22].
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)LimitedStudied in women

Endometriosis

Mixed results: six studies in a Cochrane review found no CRP difference with endometriosis, while a US survey linked endometriosis to 60% higher odds of CRP above 3 mg/L.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A Cochrane review of blood tests for endometriosis found six studies that showed no difference in CRP or hs-CRP between women with endometriosis confirmed at surgery and women without it, across stages I to IV. One used an hs-CRP assay in 834 participants and the others a standard CRP assay in 499. The reviewers concluded that CRP measured either way is not a reliable marker of endometriosis [23]. In a national US survey, women who reported a diagnosis of endometriosis had greater odds of CRP above 3.0 mg/L than women without it (adjusted odds ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.45) [24].
Population
1,333 participants in six studies, within a review whose studies enrolled women having surgery for suspected endometriosis, infertility or an ovarian mass [23]. 2,342 women in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2002 [24].
Sources
[23], [24]
Caveats
Observational. In the survey, endometriosis was self-reported, and the abstract does not list what the model adjusted for, so body weight may not be accounted for [24]. The Cochrane review rated all its included studies as of poor methodological quality [23].
Hyperbaric oxygen therapyLimitedStudied in men

Erectile function

Mixed results: erectile function scores rose 88% in an uncontrolled study of 30 men, and a sham-controlled trial after prostate surgery found no difference.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 30 men with erectile dysfunction for about 4 years, 40 daily sessions improved the erectile function score by 88% (p < 0.0001), and 80% reported a positive outcome [20]. In 109 men randomized after nerve-sparing prostatectomy to hyperbaric oxygen or air under pressure, no outcome differed between groups at 18 months [21].
Population
30 men with a mean age of 59, no control group [20]. 109 men aged 40 to 65, 83 of whom completed follow-up [21].
Sources
[20], [21]
Caveats
The positive study had no control group. The two studies enrolled different kinds of patients.
Low-fat dietLimitedStudied in women

Breast cancer

One large trial found no significant change in invasive breast cancer over 8.1 years, and fewer deaths after breast cancer over about 20 years of follow-up.

Compared with diets with more fat

The numbers and sources
Effect
Invasive breast cancer occurred in 655 women in the low-fat group (0.42% a year) and 1,072 in the comparison group (0.45%), HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.01) [13]. Over a median of 19.6 years, breast cancer followed by death was lower (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.96), while invasive breast cancer and colorectal cancer did not differ [14].
Population
48,835 postmenopausal women without prior breast cancer [13][14].
Sources
[13], [14]
Caveats
The primary result was not significant. The finding on deaths comes from additional analyses of long-term follow-up [14].
Why limited
This rests on one trial, of 48,835 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Luteinizing hormone (LH)Limited

Between assays and laboratories

Limited evidence: LH immunoassays varied by 12% to 15% on shared samples, and the upper limit US laboratories reported for men ran from 4.9 to 86.5.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Other immunoassays measuring the same serum pools, and other laboratories' reference ranges
Effect
When 16 Italian laboratories measured 5 serum pools with five automated immunoassays and one radioimmunoassay, the variance for LH was between 11.61% and 14.76%. One assay read higher than the others, one lower, and one was imprecise at low concentrations [13]. In a survey of 117 US laboratories, the upper limit of the reference range reported for men ran from 4.9 to 86.5 [14]. In one study the same women's luteal samples gave an upper limit of 20.9 mIU/mL on one platform and 9.65 on another [4].
Population
16 laboratories [13]. 117 US laboratories [14]. 87 women [4].
Sources
[13], [14], [4]
Caveats
The survey's abstract gives no unit for its limits. Its authors report that 70% of the ranges came from checking the maker's package insert values, in 20 to 200 samples [14].
Luteinizing hormone (LH)LimitedStudied in women

The LH to FSH ratio for diagnosing polycystic ovary syndrome

One study of 863 infertile women found an LH to FSH ratio cut-off of 1.33 separated women with and without PCOS with an area under the curve of 0.87.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
PCOS diagnosed by the Rotterdam criteria
Effect
At the cut-off the authors derived, 1.33, the ratio of LH to FSH had an area under the curve of 0.867 (95% CI 0.842 to 0.889), similar to 0.852 for AMH. Each one unit higher ratio went with 14.4 times the odds of PCOS (95% CI 9.3 to 22.4). The authors concluded that neither marker alone is adequate for diagnosing PCOS [15]. The 2023 international PCOS guideline does not use an LH level among its diagnostic criteria, and uses LH and FSH to rule out low gonadotropin states, usually from low body fat or intensive exercise [17].
Population
863 infertile women aged 18 to 45 at three centers in Vietnam, 441 with PCOS and 422 without [15].
Sources
[15], [17]
Caveats
One study in women already seen for infertility, so the figures may not hold for other women. The ratio is a different quantity from the LH level on this page, and LH is released in pulses (see Pulses within a day). An earlier study on this page found LH within range in women with PCOS sampled soon after an ovulation [8].
MagnesiumLimitedStudied in women

PMS symptoms

Mixed results: in small trials, magnesium eased premenstrual fluid retention in the second month but did not change mood symptoms on its own.

Compared with placebo [19][20]; vitamin B6 [20]; placebo or other nutritional interventions across the trials reviewed [21]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a crossover trial of 200 mg a day, no symptom group differed from placebo in the first month. In the second month, fluid retention symptoms (weight gain, swelling, breast tenderness, bloating) fell more than on placebo (p = 0.009) [19]. In a second crossover trial, magnesium, vitamin B6, both together and placebo did not differ overall, while magnesium plus vitamin B6 lowered anxiety-related symptoms (p = 0.040) [20]. A review of 31 RCTs found insufficient evidence for magnesium on psychological PMS symptoms, and a crossover trial of 54 women found no significant effect of 200 mg a day over 2 months [21].
Population
38 women [19]; 44 women, mean age 32 [20]; 31 RCTs with 3,254 women aged 15 to 50 [21].
Sources
[19], [20], [21]
Caveats
Trials were small and lasted one or two cycles. Only 1 of the 31 trials in the review had a low risk of bias [21]. The authors of [20] judged absorption from magnesium oxide poor.
ProgesteroneLimitedStudied in women

Between immunoassays, and against mass spectrometry

Small studies found two immunoassays read 5% and 19% above mass spectrometry, and agreement between assays ran from poor to excellent below 1.5 ng/mL.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and other immunoassays on the same samples
Effect
In samples from women having IVF, one immunoassay overestimated progesterone by 19% and another by 5% against mass spectrometry [12]. Across 413 samples measured with several assays, agreement was excellent overall, but in the ranges under 0.8, 0.8 to under 1.0 and 1.0 to under 1.5 ng/mL it varied between poor and excellent depending on the pair of assays [13]. In one reference interval study the same women's luteal samples gave a lower limit of 1.14 ng/mL on one platform and 0.55 on another [4].
Population
28 serum samples from women in IVF cycles [12]. 413 blood samples taken during ovarian stimulation [13]. 87 women [4].
Sources
[12], [13], [4]
Caveats
Small studies from single centers. Differences are largest at the low levels found before ovulation, in men and after menopause.
ProlactinLimited

Variation from one test to the next

Small studies found prolactin varied about 13% within a man over 10 weeks and 58% within a woman over a year.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same person's earlier results
Effect
In 38 men sampled weekly for 10 weeks, the within-person variation of prolactin was 13% [15]. In 21 women sampled monthly for a year it was 58% within a woman and 63% between women, with variation both by season and within a day [16].
Population
38 men in the European Biological Variation Study [15]. 21 women [16].
Sources
[15], [16]
Caveats
Small studies with different sampling schedules, so the two figures are not directly comparable.
SaunaLimited

Growth hormone

Limited evidence: growth hormone rose 16-fold in 10 men during a week of twice-daily one-hour saunas, and the response declined after the third day.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 10 healthy men exposed to an 80°C sauna for 1 hour twice a day for 7 days, serum growth hormone rose 16-fold and prolactin 2.3-fold (P < 0.01). The growth hormone response declined after the third day. Cortisol and ACTH fell slightly by the end [28].
Population
10 healthy men, with 7 women taking part in prolactin measurements only [28].
Sources
[28]
Caveats
One 1986 study with no control group. Two hours a day at 80°C is far longer than the sessions in other studies here. No muscle, recovery or body composition outcome was measured. The authors suggest dehydration may explain the hormone release.
Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG)Limited

Variation from one test to the next

Limited evidence: two hormone results from the same man differed by more than 18% to 28% about half the time, across eleven measures that included SHBG.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same person's earlier result
Effect
In men sampled up to six times over 6 months, the within-person variation of eleven hormone measures, SHBG among them, implied that two measurements would differ by more than 18% to 28% about half the time and by more than 27% to 54% about a quarter of the time, depending on the hormone [18]. In 11 controls without polycystic ovary syndrome sampled ten times at 4-day intervals, mean SHBG was 57.6 nmol/L and the mean variation within a person was 6.3 nmol/L [19].
Population
132 men aged 30 to 79 in Boston [18]. 12 women with polycystic ovary syndrome and 11 controls matched for age and weight [19].
Sources
[18], [19]
Caveats
The percentage ranges cover all eleven hormone measures, and the abstract does not give the figure for SHBG alone [18]. The second study is small [19].
TENSLimitedStudied in women

Endometriosis pain

Limited evidence: one trial of 101 women found pelvic pain eased only when TENS was added to hormonal treatment. A before-and-after study found no significant pain change.

Compared with hormonal treatment alone [14]; the same women before using TENS [15]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pelvic pain fell from 7.11 to 4.55 with TENS added to hormonal treatment (p < 0.001), with relief seen only in that group. Pain during sex improved in both groups [14]. In a study with 3 months without and 3 months with TENS, pain fell 2.29 points (p = 0.44), quality of life improved 16.57 points (p < 0.001) and daily ibuprofen fell 93 mg (p = 0.02) [15].
Population
101 women with deep endometriosis on hormonal treatment, for 8 weeks [14]. Women aged 18 to 45 with surgically confirmed endometriosis [15].
Sources
[14], [15]
Caveats
The trial abstract reports changes within each group, not a difference between them, and there was no sham [14]. The second study had no control group [15].
Total testosteroneLimitedStudied in men

Variation from one test to the next

Limited evidence: two hormone results from the same man differed by more than 18 to 28% about half the time, and 30% of low results were normal on repeat.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same man's earlier result
Effect
In men sampled up to six times over 6 months, the within-person variation of eleven hormone measures, total and free testosterone among them, implied that two measurements would differ by more than 18 to 28% about half the time and by more than 27 to 54% about a quarter of the time, depending on the hormone. Day to day biological variation accounted for more of the total than assay variation. The authors concluded that one sample is generally not sufficient and more than three is probably not warranted [31]. The Endocrine Society states that 30% of men with an initial level in the hypogonadal range have a normal level on repeat measurement [2].
Population
132 men aged 30 to 79 in Boston, 121 of whom completed all six visits [31].
Sources
[31], [2]
Caveats
The percentage ranges cover all eleven hormone measures studied, and the abstract does not give the figure for testosterone alone [31].
Total testosteroneLimitedStudied in men

Sexual function, vitality and walking in a trial that raised testosterone in older men

One trial found raising low testosterone in men 65 and older improved sexual function moderately, with no benefit for vitality or walking distance.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 790 men aged 65 or older with testosterone below 275 ng/dL and symptoms, testosterone gel for 1 year raised levels to the mid-normal range for men aged 19 to 40. Sexual activity increased (P below 0.001), as did sexual desire and erectile function. The share of men gaining at least 50 meters in the 6-minute walk did not differ significantly in the Physical Function Trial, and was 20.5% against 12.6% when men from all three trials were pooled. There was no significant benefit for vitality, and mood and depressive symptoms were slightly better [21].
Population
790 men aged 65 or older, mean of two testosterone results below 275 ng/dL, treated for 1 year [21].
Sources
[21]
Caveats
One trial of 1 year. The authors state that it enrolled too few men to draw conclusions about the risks of treatment [21].
Tranexamic acidLimitedStudied in women

Heavy bleeding, against other medicines

Limited evidence: more women improved on tranexamic acid than on NSAIDs or luteal progestogens, and fewer than with a hormonal IUD, in small trials.

Compared with NSAIDs, including mefenamic acid [1]; oral luteal progestogens [1]; a levonorgestrel IUD [1][3]; ethamsylate [1]; herbal medicines (Safoof Habis, Punica granatum) [1]; long-cycle progestogens and combined pills, indirectly in a network [3]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against NSAIDs, tranexamic acid cut blood loss 73.00 mL a cycle more (95% CI 22.65 to 123.35, 1 RCT, 49 women) and more women improved (RR 1.43, 2 RCTs, 161 women). If 61% improve on an NSAID, 71% to 100% improved on tranexamic acid. Against progestogens, more women improved (RR 1.54, 5 RCTs, 422 women): if 46% improve on a progestogen, 61% to 83% did on tranexamic acid, with fewer adverse events (RR 0.66). Against a levonorgestrel IUD, fewer women improved (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.77, 1 RCT, 42 women): if 85% improve with the IUD, 20% to 65% did on tranexamic acid [1]. In the network, the levonorgestrel IUD ranked first (MD -105.71 mL against placebo), tranexamic acid second (-80.32 mL), long-cycle progestogen third (-76.93 mL) and NSAIDs lower (-40.67 mL) [3].
Population
Women of reproductive age with heavy menstrual bleeding, 42 to 422 women per comparison [1]; 26 studies in the first-line network [3].
Sources
[1], [3]
Caveats
Most comparisons rest on one or two small trials rated low or very low quality [1]. The network ranks are indirect comparisons [3].
Ulipristal acetateLimitedStudied in women

Pregnancy after ulipristal for fibroids

Case reports: of 71 pregnancies after ulipristal for fibroids, 50 ended in live births and 19 in miscarriage, with no comparison group.

Compared with no comparison group in the case series [10]

The numbers and sources
Effect
A systematic review found 24 pregnancies after ulipristal (19 live births, 6 miscarriages), and a case series added 47 (31 live births, 13 miscarriages, 1 fetal death, 2 terminations, 1 ongoing). Of the 71, 44 had myomectomy after ulipristal. Five women who did not have surgery had delivery complications related to their fibroids [10].
Population
71 pregnancies from 6 case reports, 1 retrospective series and a multicenter chart review [10].
Sources
[10]
Caveats
No comparison group, so these counts cannot show whether ulipristal changed the chance of pregnancy or miscarriage.
Uterine fibroid proceduresLimitedStudied in women

Pregnancy after hysteroscopic removal of fibroids inside the uterus

One small trial found more pregnancies after hysteroscopic removal of submucous fibroids than with timed intercourse alone, but the difference could be chance.

Compared with expectant management with regular fertility-oriented intercourse for 12 months [10]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In women with otherwise unexplained subfertility and submucous fibroids, clinical pregnancy odds were higher after hysteroscopic myomectomy (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.97 to 6.17, P = 0.06) and miscarriage did not clearly differ (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.47 to 5.00). No data on live birth or complications were found [10].
Population
94 women with unexplained subfertility and submucous fibroids [10].
Sources
[10]
Caveats
Very low-quality evidence from one small trial [10].
Uterine fibroid proceduresLimited

Pregnancy after embolization compared with myomectomy

Limited evidence: one small trial found fewer live births after embolization than after myomectomy, while a larger trial found similar small numbers of pregnancies.

Compared with myomectomy [5][6][7]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a subgroup of one trial, live birth (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.84) and pregnancy (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.85) were less likely after embolization than myomectomy [5]. In FEMME, 12 women after embolization and 6 after myomectomy reported pregnancies over 4 years, with 7 and 5 live births (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.28) [6]. A meta-analysis reported comparable pregnancy rates [7].
Population
66 women in one trial subgroup [5]; 254 women in FEMME [6]; 13 studies [7].
Sources
[5], [6], [7]
Caveats
The Cochrane authors rated the live birth evidence very low quality, from a subgroup of a single study, and urged extreme caution in reading it [5]. Pregnancy was not the primary outcome of FEMME [6].
Whole-body cryotherapyLimited

Testosterone

Mixed results: salivary testosterone was 21% to 28% higher after one session in 14 soccer players, and blood testosterone did not change in 11 runners.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 14 academy soccer players, a session after repeated sprints produced a greater salivary testosterone response than seated rest at 2 hours (+21%) and 24 hours (+28%, both P = 0.002). Cortisol, creatine kinase and peak power did not differ [6]. In 11 endurance-trained men, a session after interval running did not change serum testosterone or cortisol against rest [10].
Population
14 professional academy soccer players [6]. 11 endurance-trained men [10].
Sources
[6], [10]
Caveats
Two small crossover studies using different fluids, saliva and serum, that disagree. Neither measured anything beyond 24 hours.
ZincLimited

Testosterone

Limited evidence: one small trial found no testosterone change in zinc-sufficient men, while a review, mostly of animal studies, found supplementation raised it, varying with baseline zinc.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 14 exercising men with zinc-sufficient diets (11.9 to 23.2 mg a day), a zinc-magnesium supplement (ZMA) raised serum zinc but did not change serum total or free testosterone [9]. A systematic review of 8 clinical and 30 animal studies concluded zinc deficiency lowers testosterone and supplementation raises it, varying with baseline zinc and testosterone [10].
Population
14 young men [9]; mixed human and animal studies [10].
Sources
[9], [10]
Caveats
The sources point in different directions. The review [10] reports no pooled effect size and draws mostly on animal data.

Not shown to help61

DHEA sulfate (DHEA-S)Strong

Body composition, physical performance and quality of life in trials that raised DHEA-S

Not shown to change body composition, physical performance, sexual function or quality of life in a meaningful way when DHEA-S was raised with DHEA in older adults.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a 2-year trial in older adults with low DHEA-S, DHEA raised the level by a median of 3.4 µg/mL in men and 3.8 µg/mL in women, which is 340 and 380 µg/dL. It had no significant effect on body composition, and did not change peak oxygen consumption, muscle strength, insulin sensitivity or quality of life. Bone density rose at the femoral neck in men and at the ultradistal radius in women [8]. Across 25 trials in older men, DHEA reduced fat mass slightly (standardized mean difference -0.35, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.05), an effect that disappeared after adjusting for the rise in testosterone and estradiol, with no effect on blood lipids, blood sugar, bone, sexual function or quality of life [9]. A review of 8 trials called the effect on muscle strength and physical function inconclusive [10]. In postmenopausal women, 23 trials found no significant improvement in libido or sexual function (0.35, -0.02 to 0.73) and no significant effect on lipids, glucose, weight or bone density [11]. A Cochrane review found no improvement in quality of life (0.16, -0.03 to 0.34) and more androgenic side effects, mainly acne (odds ratio 3.77, 1.36 to 10.4) [12].
Population
87 older men and 57 older women with low DHEA-S, treated for 2 years [8]. 1,353 older men in 25 trials, mean follow-up 36 weeks [9]. 661 adults aged 50 or older in 8 trials [10]. 1,188 postmenopausal women in 23 trials [11]. 1,273 women in 28 trials [12].
Sources
[8], [9], [10], [11], [12]
Caveats
A marker that tracks an outcome is not always one whose correction changes it. Low DHEA-S went with more deaths in cohorts. The trials measured body composition, function and quality of life, not deaths. The reviewers of the trials in women rated confidence in the evidence as low [11].
Endometriosis surgeryStrongStudied in women

Excision compared with ablation

Not shown to differ: excision and ablation eased pain from superficial endometriosis in women by similar amounts at 12 months, in two reviews.

Compared with ablation of the lesions [4][5][6][7]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooled across 3 trials, reductions in period pain (MD -0.03, 95% CI -1.27 to 1.22), pain with bowel movements (MD 0.46, 95% CI -1.09 to 2.02) and pain during sex (MD 0.10, 95% CI -2.36 to 2.56) did not differ at 12 months, nor did scores beyond 12 months [5]. Overall pain at 12 months did not differ in the Cochrane review (MD 0.00, 95% CI -1.22 to 1.22, 1 trial, 103 women) [4]. A blinded trial found no difference in overall pain at 12 months [6]. In a robot-assisted trial, the only difference was in pain during sex at 6 months, which favored ablation [7].
Population
346 women with minimal to mild endometriosis in 4 trials [5]. 103 women [4]. Women with pelvic pain and visible endometriosis [6]. 73 women with minimal to mild endometriosis [7].
Sources
[5], [4], [6], [7]
Caveats
These trials covered superficial, minimal to mild disease, not deep endometriosis. The reviewers call for larger trials with longer follow-up [5].
Letrozole and clomipheneStrongStudied in women

Unexplained infertility: letrozole compared with clomiphene

Not shown to differ from clomiphene in women with unexplained infertility, in two meta-analyses. One large trial found live birth rates of 18.7% on letrozole and 23.3% on clomiphene.

Compared with clomiphene [10][11][12]; gonadotropin injections [12]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 8 trials, a positive pregnancy test occurred in 24% on letrozole and 23% on clomiphene (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.36). Clinical pregnancy (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.85) and live birth (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08) did not differ [10]. In insemination cycles, total pregnancy did not differ (RR 1.06), and miscarriage was lower with letrozole (RR 0.61) [11]. In the AMIGOS trial of stimulation with insemination for up to four cycles, live birth rates were 32.2% with gonadotropins, 23.3% with clomiphene and 18.7% with letrozole. Letrozole's pregnancy rate was lower than gonadotropins' (P < 0.001) and did not differ significantly from clomiphene's (P = 0.10) [12].
Population
2,647 women with unexplained infertility in 8 trials [10]. Women with unexplained infertility having insemination, in trials the abstract does not count [11]. 900 ovulatory women aged 18 to 40 at US centers [12].
Sources
[10], [11], [12]
Caveats
Heterogeneity between trials was significant (I² 60.8%) [10]. Most of these trials paired the drug with insemination, so they do not test the drug alone.
Soy foodsStrongStudied in men

Testosterone and estrogen in men

Not shown to change total or free testosterone, estrogen or SHBG in men eating soy foods, soy protein or isoflavones, in two pooled analyses of clinical studies.

Compared with placebo groups [15]; values before intake in the same men, in simpler models [15]; control and baseline values the abstract does not detail [14]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 41 studies, soy protein or isoflavone intake had no significant effect on total testosterone, free testosterone, estradiol, estrone or SHBG, regardless of the statistical model, dose or study duration [14]. An earlier analysis of 15 placebo-controlled treatment groups, and 36 groups in simpler models, found no effect on testosterone, SHBG, free testosterone or free androgen index [15].
Population
Total testosterone measured in 1,753 men, free testosterone in 752 and estradiol in 1,000 [14]. Adult men in 32 reports [15].
Sources
[14], [15]
Caveats
Several authors of both analyses overlap. Studies included isoflavone extracts from soy or red clover as well as soy foods [14][15].
TribulusStrongStudied in men

Testosterone

Not shown to raise testosterone in men when taken alone. Rises appeared only in combined supplements or in a few studies of men with hypogonadism.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A systematic review of 11 studies found that testosterone rose in humans only when tribulus was part of a combined supplement, and that trials varied too much to pool [1]. In 21 men aged 20 to 36, 10 or 20 mg/kg a day for 4 weeks did not change testosterone, androstenedione or LH compared with placebo [2]. In 30 men with erectile dysfunction, 800 mg a day for 30 days did not change total testosterone (417 to 409 ng/dL, against 443 to 466 ng/dL with placebo) [3]. A review of 7 studies in physically active men found no clear effect on hormones [4]. In 30 CrossFit-trained men, testosterone fell 21.9% with placebo and was unchanged (-0.2%) with 770 mg a day over 6 weeks [5]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 8 RCTs in men with erectile dysfunction found total testosterone did not differ from placebo [6]. A 2025 systematic review of 10 studies (483 men) found that 8 reported no significant change in androgens. The 2 that found rises, of 60 to 70 ng/dL within groups, were in men with hypogonadism [7].
Population
Healthy and athletic men in RCTs [1][4]; young men in Bulgaria [2]; men with erectile dysfunction in Brazil [3]; CrossFit athletes in Spain [5]; men with erectile dysfunction in RCTs [6]; men aged 16 to 70, healthy or with infertility, erectile dysfunction or hypogonadism [7].
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]
Caveats
Small trials of 21 to 30 men. The CrossFit trial was single-blind [5].
25-hydroxyvitamin DModerateStudied in women

Polycystic ovary syndrome in women without obesity

Not shown to differ: a meta-analysis of 11 studies found no difference in vitamin D between non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome and women without it.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In non-obese women, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D did not differ significantly between women with PCOS and healthy controls. Heterogeneity was tied to region, diagnostic criteria, body mass index and assay, and the authors found significant publication bias. They suggest that low vitamin D in PCOS may be driven by obesity more than by the condition [28].
Population
533 non-obese women with PCOS and 574 controls in 11 studies [28].
Sources
[28]
Caveats
Covers non-obese women only, so it does not describe women with PCOS and obesity. The abstract gives no pooled figure [28].
AcupunctureModerateStudied in women

Period pain, compared with sham acupuncture

Not shown to ease period pain more than sham acupuncture in women with primary dysmenorrhea. The one trial at low risk of bias found no difference.

Compared with sham or placebo acupuncture [28][29]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against sham or placebo, findings across 6 trials were inconsistent, and the only trial at low risk of bias in every domain found no difference at 3, 6 or 12 months [28]. A 2025 review of 14 trials found acupuncture did not ease pain more than sham at 3 cycles after treatment [29].
Population
42 RCTs with 4,640 women with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea, 6 of them sham-controlled [28]; 14 RCTs with 970 women [29].
Sources
[28], [29]
Caveats
The Cochrane authors rated the evidence low quality, from risk of bias, poor reporting, inconsistency and possible publication bias. No sham-controlled trial reported adverse events [28].
AcupunctureModerateStudied in women

Ovulation and pregnancy in PCOS

Not shown to raise live births, ovulation or pregnancy over sham acupuncture in women with PCOS. Side effects were slightly more common with true acupuncture.

Compared with sham acupuncture [34]; relaxation, clomiphene, physical exercise or no intervention, and the pill Diane-35 [34]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against sham, live birth (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.24, 1 RCT, 926 women), ovulation (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.19, 2 RCTs, 1,010 women), clinical pregnancy (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.29, 3 RCTs, 1,117 women) and miscarriage did not clearly differ. Days between periods may have fallen (1 RCT, 141 women). Adverse events were more common with true acupuncture (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.31, 3 RCTs, 1,230 women, moderate quality) [34].
Population
1,546 women with PCOS and infrequent or absent ovulation in 8 RCTs [34].
Sources
[34]
Caveats
Evidence ranged from very low to moderate quality, and 7 of 8 trials had a high risk of bias in at least one domain. Other comparisons did not report live birth [34].
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)Moderate

Between assays

Not shown to match between assays: two automated assays read about 22% to 27% lower than an earlier manual assay, and methods disagreed in a WHO study.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The Beckman Coulter AMH Gen II manual assay, and other AMH immunoassays on the same samples
Effect
In 83 patients, results from the automated Access and Elecsys assays were 0.781 and 0.729 times the Gen II result, plus a small constant, and the authors report that values from the automated assays were substantially lower [15]. In 1,729 routine samples the Elecsys assay read 24% to 28% lower than the Gen II assay [5]. In 178 samples, one assay read significantly higher and one significantly lower than the Gen II and Access assays, with all pairs correlated above 0.9 [20]. In the World Health Organization study that established a Reference Reagent, 16 valid method and platform combinations gave content estimates with a geometric coefficient of variation of 42%, and the reagent behaved like patient samples in 6 methods, partly in 3 and not in 7 [2].
Population
83 patients before IVF [15]. 1,729 routine serum samples [5]. 178 serum samples [20]. Seven laboratories [2].
Sources
[15], [5], [20], [2]
Caveats
A cut point or interval set with one assay does not carry over to another. The World Health Organization study notes that the widely cited conversion of 1 ng/mL to 7.14 pmol/L rests on an assumed molecular mass of 140 kDa [2].
Chiropractic and spinal manipulationModerate

Asthma, high blood pressure and period pain

Not shown to treat asthma in children, high blood pressure or period pain. Every high- or acceptable-quality trial found manipulation no better than sham.

Compared with sham interventions [10]

The numbers and sources
Effect
All randomized trials of acceptable or high quality found spinal manipulation was not superior to sham for infantile colic, childhood asthma, hypertension, primary dysmenorrhea and migraine. No trial tested whether manipulation prevents any of these conditions [10].
Population
6 randomized trials with 534 participants [10].
Sources
[10]
Caveats
Few trials for each condition. Six of the 50 researchers at the review summit did not approve the final report [10].
DHEAModerate

Quality of life and menopause symptoms

Not shown to improve quality of life in menopausal women or in older adults over 2 years.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In menopausal women, DHEA did not improve quality of life (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.34, 8 studies, 287 women). Effects on menopausal symptoms were unclear because trials measured them in ways that could not be pooled [5]. In older men and women over 2 years, quality of life did not change [3].
Population
Peri- and postmenopausal women in 28 trials (1,273 women) [5]; 144 elderly adults [3].
Sources
[3], [5]
Caveats
Quality of life evidence was rated moderate quality [5].
EstradiolModerate

Immunoassays at low concentrations

Not shown to match mass spectrometry at low levels: direct immunoassays read 6% to 74% high in men, and US laboratories averaged 34% high at 24 pg/mL.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, and reference targets set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Effect
The Endocrine Society reports that the limit of quantitation of most direct immunoassays is 30 to 100 pg/mL, which it calls insufficient for measurements in children, postmenopausal women, men and women taking aromatase inhibitors. It adds that even mass spectrometry methods may have difficulty below 5 pg/mL [4]. In 101 men, five commercial direct immunoassays all read higher than mass spectrometry, by 6% to 74%, and two of them detected estradiol in only 53% and 72% of samples [13]. When 76 laboratories measured five single-donor sera, the mean bias against the reference targets was 34% (range -17% to 175%) at 24.1 pg/mL, 40% (-33% to 386%) at 28.4, 16% (-45% to 193%) at 61.7, 5% (-27% to 117%) at 94.1 and -4% (-31% to 21%) at 127 pg/mL. Of nine measuring systems, none met the 12.5% criterion at the two lowest levels [2].
Population
101 men older than 40 [13]. 76 clinical laboratories certified by New York State [2].
Sources
[4], [13], [2]
Caveats
A result near or below 30 pg/mL from a routine immunoassay may differ widely from a mass spectrometry result on the same sample. The proficiency survey's lowest sample was 24.1 pg/mL, above the levels in many men and postmenopausal women [2].
49 more
Free testosteroneModerate

Direct analog immunoassay

Shown not to match equilibrium dialysis: direct analog immunoassays read a fraction of the dialysis value and followed total testosterone, not free testosterone.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Equilibrium dialysis
Effect
Across sera with widely varying sex hormone-binding globulin, analog immunoassay values were only a fraction of the free testosterone found by dialysis, and the fraction changed with the binding globulin level [17]. In laboratory experiments, an analog assay did not detect the free testosterone in dialysate, and its results followed total testosterone and did not follow free testosterone when total testosterone was held constant [18]. In 147 women, direct radioimmunoassay had high systematic bias and random variability and correlated less closely with dialysis (r = 0.81) than calculated values did (r = 0.99) [14]. The Endocrine Society, the European Association of Urology and a joint statement of five societies each state that these assays are inaccurate [1][7][8].
Population
Sera from men and women with low to very high binding globulin levels [17]. Serum fractions from normal male serum [18]. 147 women with varied androgen and estrogen status, each sampled three times in a month [14].
Sources
[17], [18], [14], [1], [7], [8]
Caveats
A laboratory report does not always say which method produced a free testosterone result. The American Urological Association describes the direct method differently, as correlating with dialysis and being unreliable because of high variation [3].
hCGModerate

IVF pregnancy with intrauterine hCG before embryo transfer

Not shown to change live birth or pregnancy rates with intrauterine hCG before embryo transfer in people having IVF.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In an individual participant data meta-analysis, intrauterine hCG before embryo transfer did not change live birth rates (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.19) or clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.31) compared with placebo or no intervention [3].
Population
2,244 people undergoing IVF in 7 RCTs with individual data, out of 28 RCTs located [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
The 21 trials without individual data all failed the review's trustworthiness checks, and those trials had shown higher pregnancy rates [3]. This is hCG placed in the uterus, not the injected trigger used for ovulation.
IodineModerate

Child development after iodine in pregnancy

Not shown to change child cognition, language or motor scores after iodine in pregnancy in women with mild to moderate deficiency.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooled trials found no effect on child cognitive scores (mean difference -0.18, 95% CI -1.22 to 0.87), language or motor scores [3]. In the largest trial, verbal IQ at age 5 to 6 was 89.5 on 200 µg a day and 90.2 on placebo (difference -0.7, 95% CI -2.9 to 1.5), and performance IQ 97.5 against 99.1 [4].
Population
Mildly to moderately iodine-deficient pregnant women, 10 RCTs in the review with 2 pooled for cognition [3]; 832 women in India and Thailand, 313 children analyzed [4].
Sources
[3], [4]
Caveats
Only 1 of 3 trials on child development was adequately powered [3]. These results do not describe severe deficiency. The trial was funded in part by the Nestlé Foundation [4].
Letrozole and clomipheneModerateStudied in women

Live birth in unexplained infertility: clomiphene compared with no treatment

Not shown to raise live births in women with unexplained infertility against no treatment or placebo. In one trial, 14% on clomiphene and 17% with no treatment had a baby.

Compared with no treatment or placebo [8]; expectant management, meaning no treatment for six months [9]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Clomiphene did not raise live births against no treatment or placebo (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.38). Clinical pregnancy did not differ with insemination (OR 2.40, 95% CI 0.70 to 8.19), without it (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.66), or with an hCG trigger (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.56 to 4.80) [8]. In a Scottish trial, live births were 26 of 192 (14%) with clomiphene, 32 of 193 (17%) with expectant management and 43 of 191 (23%) with unstimulated insemination. Against expectant management, the odds ratio was 0.79 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.38) for clomiphene and 1.46 (95% CI 0.88 to 2.43) for insemination [9].
Population
1,159 women in 7 trials, at clomiphene doses of 50 to 250 mg for up to 10 days [8]. 580 women in couples with over two years of infertility, confirmed ovulation, open tubes and motile sperm, in five Scottish hospitals [9].
Sources
[8], [9]
Caveats
The review's live birth estimate is identical to the Scottish trial's, so it may rest on that one trial. Heterogeneity between trials ranged from 34% to 58% [8].
MacaModerateStudied in men

Semen quality

Not shown to raise sperm concentration against placebo, with mixed effects on other semen measures in infertile and healthy men.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs, maca did not raise sperm concentration compared with placebo (mean difference 2.22, 95% CI -2.94 to 7.37, p = 0.4). Effects on other semen measures were mixed in infertile and healthy men [6].
Population
Infertile men and healthy men [6].
Sources
[6]
Caveats
Five small trials [6].
ProlactinModerate

Macroprolactin

Shown to overstate active prolactin when macroprolactin is present: it fully explained 22% to 24% of high results in two laboratory series.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Prolactin measured after polyethylene glycol precipitation, which removes macroprolactin
Effect
Macroprolactin is a large form of prolactin that immunoassays detect and that has little activity in the body. In one center, 453 of 2,089 high samples (22%) were explained entirely by it, a similar share at every level of total prolactin, and patients with macroprolactin could not be told apart by clinical features alone [10]. In another series it accounted for 24% of 300 high samples, and when ten such samples went to 18 laboratories, the results from nine assay systems differed by 2.3 to 7.8 times [11]. A Pituitary Society consensus puts large forms of prolactin in 10% to 25% of people with high prolactin [12]. Prolactin measured after precipitation is a different quantity from the total prolactin on this page, with its own intervals, for example 63 to 245 mIU/L in men and 75 to 381 mIU/L in women on one assay [13].
Population
2,089 high samples over 5 years in one center [10]. 300 high samples and 18 laboratories [11]. 53 men and 93 women for the intervals after precipitation [13].
Sources
[10], [11], [12], [13]
Caveats
The two series share authors and date from 2002 and 2005, so the assays may since have changed. A standard lab report of total prolactin does not show whether macroprolactin is present.
Saw palmettoModerateStudied in men

Sexual function and libido

Not shown to improve sexual function or quality of life in men with an enlarged prostate, in very low certainty evidence.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 6 RCTs, sexual function did not differ from placebo (Hedges' g -0.08, 95% CI -0.93 to 0.77, I² 96%). In the trials that used the IIEF questionnaire, the result was g -0.21 (95% CI -0.54 to 0.13, I² 29%). Quality of life did not improve either [8].
Population
Men with benign prostatic hyperplasia in 6 RCTs [8].
Sources
[8]
Caveats
Certainty was very low. The pooled analysis combined different sexual function questionnaires, and the prediction interval ran from -2.45 to 2.29 [8].
SulfonylureasModerateStudied in pregnancy

Gestational diabetes

Not shown to match insulin in gestational diabetes: glyburide was followed by heavier babies and about twice the newborn low blood sugar.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Against insulin, glibenclamide (glyburide) was associated with higher birth weight (mean difference 109 g, 95% CI 35.9 to 181), more macrosomia (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.35 to 5.08) and more neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.20). Against glibenclamide, metformin was associated with less maternal weight gain, lower birth weight (209 g lower) and less macrosomia (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.81). Treatment failure was higher with metformin than with glibenclamide [12].
Population
2,509 women with gestational diabetes needing drug treatment, in 15 articles [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
Not an approved use. Short-term outcomes only.
TrazodoneModerateStudied in men

Erectile dysfunction

Not shown to improve erectile dysfunction: 37% responded on trazodone against 20% on placebo across six small trials, a difference that was not statistically significant.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A positive treatment response occurred in 37% on trazodone and 20% on placebo (relative benefit increase 1.6, 95% CI 0.8 to 3.3). Three of six trials showed an apparent benefit, significant in two. Benefit appeared greater at 150 to 200 mg a day than at 50 mg, and in men whose erectile dysfunction was psychological in origin. Dry mouth (19%), sedation (16%), dizziness (16%) and fatigue (15%) were reported on trazodone [11].
Population
396 men in 6 trials [11].
Sources
[11]
Caveats
The trials were small, brief, mixed in population and in some cases weak in method [11]. Not an approved use.
Vitamin AModerateStudied in pregnancy

Pregnancy outcomes

Not shown to lower maternal or newborn death or preterm birth in pregnant women. Night blindness and anemia in mothers were lower.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Vitamin A alone did not change maternal death (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.20), perinatal death (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.07) or preterm birth (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.01). Maternal night blindness (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) and maternal anemia (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.94) were lower [2].
Population
19 trials with over 310,000 women, mostly in Nepal, Ghana and Bangladesh [2].
Sources
[2]
Caveats
Baseline vitamin A status differed between populations. The reduction in maternal infection (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.99) came from low quality evidence [2].
Vitamin DModerateStudied in men

Testosterone in men

Not shown to change testosterone in adult men.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 11 trial comparisons, vitamin D did not change total testosterone (MD 0.47 nmol/L, 95% CI -0.50 to 1.44, I² 24.1%), SHBG (MD 0.27 nmol/L, 95% CI -2.14 to 2.68) or free androgen index (MD -0.37, 95% CI -4.28 to 3.55) [32].
Population
Adult men in RCTs [32].
Sources
[32]
Caveats
GRADE certainty was low for total testosterone, SHBG and free androgen index, and very low for calculated free testosterone [32].
Vitamin DModerateStudied in women

Excess hair and androgens in PCOS

Not shown to change hair growth scores or SHBG in women with PCOS in one review. Total testosterone fell slightly against placebo.

Compared with placebo [73]; placebo, metformin, short-acting contraceptives, ovulation drugs or assisted reproduction without vitamin D [69]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 13 RCTs (840 women), modified Ferriman-Gallwey hair scores (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.79 to 0.86) and SHBG (MD 1.33, 95% CI -2.70 to 5.36) did not differ from placebo. Total testosterone fell by 0.17 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.29) and serum vitamin D rose by 17.81 [73]. A review of add-on vitamin D in women seeking pregnancy also found lower androgen levels (MD -2.31, 95% CI -3.51 to -1.11) [69].
Population
840 women with PCOS in 13 RCTs [73]; 1,961 women with PCOS in 20 RCTs [69].
Sources
[73], [69]
Caveats
The abstract of [73] does not give units for testosterone or vitamin D. The hair score result rests on one review.
Vitex (chasteberry)ModerateStudied in women

Heavy menstrual bleeding

Not shown to reduce menstrual blood loss against placebo in women. Loss scores were higher than on mefenamic acid in the first cycle, not the second.

Compared with placebo [6]; mefenamic acid [6]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Menstrual blood loss did not differ from placebo in the first cycle (MD 3.08, 95% CI -3.11 to 9.26) or the second (MD 0.00, 95% CI -5.75 to 5.75). Against mefenamic acid, blood loss scores were higher on vitex in the first cycle (MD 7.17, 95% CI 0.33 to 14.01) and did not differ in the second (MD 12.18, 95% CI -5.57 to 29.94) [6].
Population
Women of reproductive age without gynecologic disorders in 5 trials [6].
Sources
[6]
Caveats
The authors rated the trials of relatively low quality. The women did not have diagnosed gynecologic disease, so the result may not apply to heavy bleeding from fibroids [6].
AcupunctureLimitedStudied in women

Live birth after IVF

One trial of 848 women found live births did not differ between acupuncture and sham acupuncture during IVF, 18.3% against 17.8%.

Compared with sham acupuncture with a non-penetrating needle [18]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Live births occurred in 74 of 405 women given acupuncture (18.3%) and 72 of 404 given sham (17.8%) (risk difference 0.5%, 95% CI -4.9% to 5.8%, relative risk 1.02) [18].
Population
848 women having a fresh IVF cycle at 16 centers in Australia and New Zealand [18].
Sources
[18]
Caveats
One trial, with treatment only during ovarian stimulation and around embryo transfer. No no-treatment group was included.
Cold water immersionLimitedStudied in men

Testosterone

One small study found testosterone fell after a single immersion in water below 4°C in 13 young men.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Blood testosterone was significantly lower after the immersion than before it (p = 0.000037). Thyroid-stimulating hormone and cortisol did not change significantly [27].
Population
13 healthy young men, one immersion at an air temperature of -15°C [27].
Sources
[27]
Caveats
One immersion, no control group, and no measurement beyond the day. The abstract gives no size for the fall.
Copper levelLimited

Oral contraceptives and estrogen

One German survey found serum copper 34% to 55% higher in women using oral contraceptives, depending on the progestin in the pill.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Serum copper in women in the same survey not using oral contraceptives
Effect
Among women aged 18 to 44 in a national survey, use of oral contraceptives was associated with higher serum copper for every type of pill. The increase was 55% (95% CI 37 to 76) with antiandrogen progestins, 46% (36 to 56) with desogestrel, 42% (29 to 57) with norethisterone or lynestrenol and 34% (24 to 45) with levonorgestrel. Copper varied more by progestin than by estrogen content [13]. A US report states that ceruloplasmin increases with oral contraceptive use [3].
Population
610 nonpregnant, nonlactating women aged 18 to 44 in West Germany, surveyed in 1987 to 1988 [13].
Sources
[13], [3]
Caveats
Cross-sectional, with pills in use in the 1980s. The published adult range cited on this page was not set separately for women using hormonal contraception [3].
Copper levelLimited

Pregnancy

One Chinese survey found median serum copper rose from 157.5 µg/dL in the first trimester to 208.2 in the third, above the adult range a US report cites.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Results in the first trimester of the same survey, and the adult range of 10 to 25 µmol/L cited by a US report
Effect
In pregnant women in a national survey, median serum copper was 157.5 µg/dL in the first trimester, 198.6 in the second and 208.2 in the third, and the central 95% of all results ran from 107.0 to 362.4 µg/dL [6]. The adult range a US report cites tops out at 25 µmol/L, about 159 µg/dL, and the same report states that serum copper and ceruloplasmin increase during pregnancy, so that a deficiency could be masked [3].
Population
1,400 pregnant women in the China Nutrition and Health Survey of 2010 to 2012 [6].
Sources
[6], [3]
Caveats
A cross-sectional survey, so different women were sampled in each trimester. The survey did not measure ceruloplasmin [6].
DIMLimitedStudied in men

Hormonal acne and testosterone in men

One small trial found DIM did not significantly change testosterone in 45 men with prostate cancer. Acne has been tested only in the lab, against acne bacteria.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 45 men awaiting prostate surgery, 21 to 28 days of DIM or placebo produced no significant change in plasma testosterone, PSA or IGF-1 measures. Only the urinary 2-hydroxyestrone to 16-hydroxyestrone ratio changed, at the higher dose [3]. In male rats given DIM for 53 days, one middle dose had an anti-androgenic effect, and higher doses lowered sperm motility and damaged testicular tissue [7]. In the lab, DIM inhibited growth and biofilm formation by Cutibacterium acnes, the main acne bacterium [8].
Population
45 men with prostate cancer [3]. 38 Sprague Dawley rats [7]. Bacterial cultures [8].
Sources
[3], [7], [8]
Caveats
The human trial was short, in men with prostate cancer, and testosterone was a secondary measure [3]. No study of acne in people taking DIM was located. Rat and lab findings do not show what happens in people [7][8].
EstradiolLimitedStudied in women

Day of the menstrual cycle

One study found median estradiol rose more than sixfold within one cycle, from 125 pmol/L in the early follicular phase to 817 at ovulation.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same women's samples from the early follicular phase
Effect
Median estradiol by sub-phase was 125 pmol/L early follicular, 172 intermediate follicular, 464 late follicular, 817 at ovulation, 390 early luteal, 505 intermediate luteal and 396 late luteal [5]. A mass spectrometry study that sampled women daily reported a different interval for each of six parts of the cycle [6].
Population
85 women aged 18 to 37 sampled about three times a week through one natural cycle [5]. 30 premenopausal women sampled daily [6].
Sources
[5], [6]
Caveats
One immunoassay study with authors employed by the assay's maker [5]. A result from a premenopausal woman cannot be placed against a phase range without knowing the cycle day.
Evening primrose oilLimitedStudied in women

Premenstrual syndrome

Limited evidence: the two most tightly controlled of 7 small trials found no benefit for premenstrual syndrome.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A systematic review found 7 placebo-controlled trials. The two most tightly controlled trials showed no benefit, and inconsistent scoring prevented pooling [3].
Population
Women with premenstrual syndrome [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
The trials were small, so modest effects cannot be excluded [3].
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)LimitedStudied in women

One cycle to the next

Limited evidence: early-cycle FSH in the same woman differed by up to about 4.4 mIU/mL in either direction between two cycles.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same woman's early follicular FSH in another cycle
Effect
In 100 women tested in the early follicular phase of two cycles, the limits of agreement for FSH were +4.36 and -4.52 IU/L. Its range of variation was 1.29 times its own mean, against 0.48 for the antral follicle count [13]. In 85 women tested in up to four cycles, the variance of basal FSH differed between cycles by a ratio of 2.44, and a large variation from cycle to cycle went with lower ovarian reserve [14]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine states that FSH has significant variability between and within cycles, which limits the reliability of a single measurement [8].
Population
100 women having two cycles of assisted reproduction [13]. 85 regularly menstruating women aged 18 to 39 [14].
Sources
[13], [14], [8]
Caveats
Both studies enrolled women having fertility treatment. A result from a woman who still has periods cannot be placed against a phase range without knowing the cycle day.
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)Limited

Natural conception in women without infertility

Limited evidence: in two cohorts early-cycle FSH did not predict natural conception, including FSH above 10 mIU/mL in women aged 30 to 44.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In women aged 30 to 44 who had been trying to conceive for 3 months or less, those with early follicular FSH above 10 mIU/mL had a predicted probability of conceiving of 63% by 6 cycles (95% CI 50% to 73%) against 62% (57% to 66%) in women with normal values, and 82% against 75% by 12 cycles. Neither difference was significant [6]. In 102 women planning pregnancy and followed for a year, basal FSH did not predict time to ongoing pregnancy once age was accounted for (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.06) [7].
Population
750 women aged 30 to 44 without a history of infertility, 83 of them with FSH above 10 mIU/mL [6]. 102 women planning pregnancy [7].
Sources
[6], [7], [8]
Caveats
Observational. Both cohorts enrolled women with no known infertility, so they do not describe women already having trouble conceiving. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine states that markers of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential independently of age [8].
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)LimitedStudied in women

Endometriosis

One small study in a Cochrane review found no difference in FSH or LH between women with and without endometriosis.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A Cochrane review of blood tests for endometriosis found one study in which FSH and LH did not differ significantly between women with endometriosis confirmed at surgery and women without it. The reviewers describe this as consistent with other studies of hormones in endometriosis and did not recommend further study of these hormones as diagnostic markers [17].
Population
49 participants in one study [17].
Sources
[17]
Caveats
One small study, which could miss a modest difference. The review rated all its included studies as of poor methodological quality [17].
Free testosteroneLimitedStudied in women

Sexual function in women

One survey found no link between a low free testosterone and low self-reported sexual function in women aged 18 to 75.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a community survey, no clinically significant relationship was found between a low score in any domain of sexual function and a low serum total or free testosterone. A low dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate level did go with low scores in some domains, and the authors concluded that no single androgen level predicts low sexual function in women [13].
Population
1,021 women drawn at random from the electoral roll in Victoria, Australia [13].
Sources
[13]
Caveats
One cross-sectional survey from 2002 and 2003. A comparison of methods in women found the direct immunoassay had high bias and a higher detection limit than dialysis [14].
HemoglobinLimitedStudied in women

Detecting iron deficiency in young women with heavy periods

One clinic study found hemoglobin missed more than half of iron deficiency in young women with heavy periods, with 41% sensitivity against a ferritin below 20 ng/mL.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Ferritin below 20 ng/mL
Effect
Of 114 young women referred for heavy menstrual bleeding, 58 (50.9%) had ferritin below 20 ng/mL, and only 24 of them (41.4%) were anemic. For low ferritin, hemoglobin alone had a sensitivity of 41.4% (95% CI 28.7 to 54.1) and specificity of 91.1% (83.6 to 98.5), and a complete blood count 46.3% and 83.9%. The authors conclude that fewer than half of iron deficiency cases are found by hemoglobin or blood count alone [23].
Population
114 girls and young women aged 9 to 19 referred to one US hematology clinic for heavy menstrual bleeding [23].
Sources
[23]
Caveats
Retrospective, at one referral clinic, so the share with low ferritin may differ in young women generally. Ferritin is itself raised by inflammation (see the ferritin page), so the reference is imperfect.
HemoglobinLimitedStudied in women

Endometriosis

One small study in a Cochrane review found hemoglobin did not differ between women with and without endometriosis.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A Cochrane review of blood tests for endometriosis listed hemoglobin, with platelet count and other blood count measures from the same study, among markers that did not differ between women with endometriosis confirmed at surgery and women without it. The reviewers did not recommend further study of these as diagnostic markers [24].
Population
94 participants in one study [24].
Sources
[24]
Caveats
One small study, and the review rated all its included studies as of poor methodological quality [24].
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)LimitedStudied in women

Detecting endometriosis

Limited evidence: in a Cochrane review, three studies of hs-CRP gave sensitivities of 41% to 83% and specificities of 47% to 87% against surgery.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Endometriosis seen at surgery (laparoscopy)
Effect
Three studies with six data sets tested hs-CRP against surgical findings at cut-offs that varied, with sensitivities of 0.41 to 0.83 and specificities of 0.47 to 0.87. The highest figures, 0.83 and 0.87, came from one study of 95 women sampled in the follicular phase. Five of the data sets drew on overlapping groups of women, so the results were not pooled. The review set a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.79 as the accuracy a blood test would need to replace diagnostic surgery. Across 122 blood markers in 141 studies, none consistently met its criteria for replacing surgery or for triage, and the reviewers concluded that none was accurate enough for clinical use outside research [23].
Population
506 participants in three studies of hs-CRP, within 141 studies of 15,141 women [23].
Sources
[23]
Caveats
The review rated every included study as of poor methodological quality, and the women were already having surgery, with endometriosis in 10% to 85% of them, so the figures may not hold for women tested for symptoms alone. Its searches ran to 2015 [23].
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)LimitedStudied in women

Uterine fibroids

One US survey found no clear link between uterine fibroids and CRP above 3 mg/L.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In the same national survey that linked endometriosis to higher CRP, the authors report that no substantive patterns emerged between uterine fibroids and CRP above 3.0 mg/L or leukocyte telomere length [24].
Population
2,342 women in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2002 [24].
Sources
[24]
Caveats
One cross-sectional analysis with self-reported diagnoses, and the abstract gives no odds ratio for fibroids [24]. No meta-analysis of inflammation markers in women with fibroids was located.
Letrozole and clomipheneLimitedStudied in women

PCOS: letrozole compared with ovarian drilling surgery

Limited evidence: in one trial of 141 women with PCOS, live births did not differ significantly between letrozole and laparoscopic ovarian drilling.

Compared with laparoscopic ovarian drilling [3]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Live birth OR 2.07 (95% CI 0.99 to 4.32). Where 22% would have a live birth after drilling, 24% to 47% would on letrozole. Clinical pregnancy did not differ significantly across 3 trials (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.28) [3].
Population
141 women in 1 trial for live birth, 367 women in 3 trials for pregnancy [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
The reviewers rated the live birth evidence very low in certainty and the pregnancy evidence low [3].
LevothyroxineLimited

Child IQ when treated in pregnancy

One trial found no difference in child IQ at 5 years when women with subclinical hypothyroidism or low free T4 were treated from mid-pregnancy.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Children of women treated for subclinical hypothyroidism had a median IQ of 97 against 94 on placebo (P = 0.71). In a parallel trial for low free T4, median IQ was 94 against 91 (P = 0.30). No other neurocognitive or pregnancy outcome differed [8].
Population
677 women with subclinical hypothyroidism and 526 with low free T4, starting at a mean 16.7 to 17.8 weeks of pregnancy, with children followed for 5 years [8].
Sources
[8]
Caveats
One trial. Treatment started at 8 to 20 weeks, so it does not describe treatment from conception. Funded by the National Institutes of Health [8].
Luteinizing hormone (LH)LimitedStudied in women

Day of the menstrual cycle

Limited evidence: median LH rose from 6.4 IU/L early in the cycle to 24.0 at ovulation, and individual surges varied widely in size and length.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same women's samples from the early follicular phase
Effect
Median LH by part of the cycle was 6.41 IU/L early follicular, 7.36 intermediate follicular, 8.52 late follicular, 24.0 at ovulation, 9.66 early luteal, 5.36 intermediate luteal and 5.00 late luteal [3]. In a study that tracked urine LH and ultrasound through 283 cycles, individual LH surges were extremely variable in configuration, amplitude and duration [9].
Population
85 women aged 18 to 37 sampled about three times a week through one natural cycle [3]. 107 women over 283 cycles [9].
Sources
[3], [9], [10]
Caveats
A result from a woman who still has periods cannot be placed against a phase range without knowing the cycle day. The surge study measured LH in urine, and home ovulation predictor kits do the same. Urine LH is a different quantity from the blood ranges on this page. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine states that urine results generally correlate well with the peak in serum LH, and that accuracy and reliability vary among products [10].
Luteinizing hormone (LH)Limited

Pulses within a day

Limited evidence: LH is released in pulses, 8 to 15 a day in the luteal phase in one study, with the larger pulses averaging 16.9 mIU/mL in size.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Blood samples drawn every 10 minutes for 24 hours from the same women
Effect
In women sampled every 10 minutes for 24 hours in the luteal phase, LH pulses slowed from a mean of 15.2 in 24 hours in the early luteal phase to 8.4 in the late luteal phase. The larger pulses averaged 16.9 mIU/mL in amplitude and the smaller 2.3 [11]. In men sampled up to six times over 6 months, short-term variability was greater for hormones with pulsatile secretion, with LH given as the example, than for hormones that vary less through the day [12].
Population
15 women with normal cycles [11]. 132 men aged 30 to 79 in Boston [12].
Sources
[11], [12]
Caveats
The study of women dates from 1984. In the study of men each sample was a pool of two draws 20 minutes apart, which smooths some of the pulse, and the abstract gives no figure for LH alone [12].
Luteinizing hormone (LH)LimitedStudied in women

Endometriosis

One small study in a Cochrane review found no difference in LH or FSH between women with and without endometriosis.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A Cochrane review of blood tests for endometriosis found one study in which LH and FSH did not differ significantly between women with endometriosis confirmed at surgery and women without it. The reviewers describe this as consistent with other studies of hormones in endometriosis and did not recommend further study of these hormones as diagnostic markers [16].
Population
49 participants in one study [16].
Sources
[16]
Caveats
One small study, which could miss a modest difference. The review rated all its included studies as of poor methodological quality [16].
NSAIDsLimitedStudied in women

Endometriosis pain

One small trial found naproxen did not clearly relieve endometriosis pain more than placebo, in very low-quality evidence.

Compared with placebo [26]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pain relief on naproxen did not differ clearly from placebo (OR 3.27, 95% CI 0.61 to 17.69, 24 women). The need for extra pain medicine (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.29) and side effects (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.47) were inconclusive [26].
Population
24 women with endometriosis in one crossover trial, the only one of two included trials that could be analyzed [26].
Sources
[26]
Caveats
One small trial with unclear risk of bias. The review found no new trials in its 2016 update, and no data on quality of life or daily activities [26].
ProgesteroneLimitedStudied in women

Swings within a day in the luteal phase

One study found mid and late luteal progesterone swung between 2.3 and 40.1 ng/mL within 24 hours, often within minutes.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Blood samples drawn every 10 minutes for 24 hours from the same women
Effect
In the early luteal phase progesterone was stable over 24 hours. In the mid and late luteal phase it fluctuated rapidly, from levels as low as 2.3 ng/mL to peaks of 40.1, often within minutes, following pulses of luteinizing hormone by 25 to 55 minutes [11]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine states that luteal progesterone can fluctuate sevenfold over a few hours [5].
Population
6 women with normal cycles, two each in the early, mid and late luteal phase [11].
Sources
[11], [5]
Caveats
One study of 6 women from 1984. It means a single luteal result can land on a peak or a trough.
ProgesteroneLimitedStudied in women

Part of the luteal phase

One study found median progesterone peaked at 39.2 nmol/L, about 12.3 ng/mL, in the middle of the luteal phase and was less than half that late in it.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same women's samples from other parts of the cycle
Effect
Median progesterone was 0.380 nmol/L in the early follicular phase, 0.210 intermediate follicular, 0.188 late follicular, 1.59 at ovulation, 22.6 early luteal, 39.2 intermediate luteal and 18.2 late luteal. In ng/mL the three luteal medians are about 7.1, 12.3 and 5.7 [3].
Population
85 women aged 18 to 37 sampled about three times a week through one natural cycle [3].
Sources
[3]
Caveats
One immunoassay study with authors employed by the assay's maker. A luteal result cannot be placed against a range without knowing how many days have passed since ovulation.
ProgesteroneLimitedStudied in pregnancy

Live birth in a trial of progesterone for bleeding in early pregnancy

One trial found vaginal progesterone for bleeding in early pregnancy did not significantly raise live births: 75% against 72% on placebo.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Women with vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy were given vaginal progesterone 400 mg twice daily or placebo until 16 weeks. A live birth after at least 34 weeks occurred in 75% (1,513 of 2,025) on progesterone and 72% (1,459 of 2,013) on placebo, a relative rate of 1.03 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.07, P = 0.08). Adverse events did not differ significantly [8].
Population
4,153 women at 48 hospitals in the United Kingdom [8].
Sources
[8]
Caveats
A marker that tracks an outcome is not always one whose correction changes it. The trial enrolled women by bleeding and did not select them by blood progesterone or treat to a blood level, so it does not test raising a low result [8].
Why limited
This rests on one trial, of 4,153 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
ProlactinLimited

Stress at the blood draw and timing

One study found 27% of people referred for a high prolactin had a normal level when the sample was repeated through a cannula, at once or after rest.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
A repeat sample drawn through a cannula, immediately and after 120 minutes of bed rest
Effect
Of 235 people referred after one raised prolactin, 64 (27%) were within the normal range on retesting: 41 (17%) on the sample drawn straight after the cannula was placed and 23 (9%) after 120 minutes of rest. Referral levels overlapped widely between people whose level stayed high and those whose level did not, and a referral level of 2,000 mU/L (94 ng/mL) was 97% specific for a level that stayed high [14]. A Pituitary Society consensus states that stress, for example from the needle, can raise prolactin two to four times for less than an hour, and that exercise, high-protein meals and alcohol can raise it [12]. MedlinePlus lists stress, high-protein meals, recent exercise and breast stimulation as temporary causes [2].
Population
235 patients at one center from 2000 to 2010, referred with prolactin above 19 ng/mL in men or 24 ng/mL in women and below 260 ng/mL [14].
Sources
[14], [12], [2]
Caveats
One retrospective study at one center, which excluded people with known pituitary disease, dopamine antagonist use or macroprolactin [14].
ProlactinLimited

Agreement between assays

One study found two widely used prolactin assays disagreed on the same samples, with upper reference limits of 37.8 and 23.6 ng/mL in women.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
A second prolactin immunoassay run on the same specimens
Effect
On the same 374 specimens, the upper limit of the reference interval was 37.8 ng/mL in women and 22.8 in men on the Roche assay, and 23.6 and 14.5 on the Siemens assay. The regression slopes between the two assays were 1.52 to 1.63, in line with earlier work that had found Roche results about 50% higher. The manufacturers' own upper limits ran the other way, 23.3 and 15.2 ng/mL for Roche against 29.2 and 17.7 for Siemens [3]. A Pituitary Society consensus states that diagnosis depends on assay-specific and sex-specific reference intervals [12].
Population
374 leftover specimens from outpatients aged 18 to 50 in Wisconsin [3].
Sources
[3], [12]
Caveats
One study of two assays. The consensus also describes a rare assay artifact, the hook effect, in which a very high prolactin reads as only moderately raised [12].
ProlactinLimitedStudied in women

Detecting endometriosis

Limited evidence: in one study within a Cochrane review, prolactin above 14.8 ng/mL detected endometriosis with 44% sensitivity and 94% specificity, which the reviewers judged too insensitive.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
Endometriosis seen at surgery
Effect
One study with two data sets tested prolactin in the luteal phase. Above 14.8 ng/mL it had a sensitivity of 0.44 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.58) and a specificity of 0.94 (0.80 to 0.99), and above 20 ng/mL 0.21 and 1.00. The reviewers judged the sensitivity unacceptably low even for a triage test. Across 122 blood markers, they found none accurate enough to replace surgery or for clinical use outside research [18].
Population
97 participants in one study [18].
Sources
[18]
Caveats
One study, and the review rated all its included studies as of poor methodological quality [18]. Stress at the blood draw also raises prolactin (see Stress at the blood draw and timing).
SaunaLimitedStudied in men

Testosterone

Small studies found no change in testosterone or other sex hormones in men, after 7 days of intensive sauna use or 3 months of twice-weekly sessions.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Testosterone, FSH and LH did not change significantly in 10 men over 7 days of twice-daily one-hour saunas [28]. In 10 men taking two 15-minute sessions a week at 80°C to 90°C for 3 months, sex hormones did not change significantly [29].
Population
10 healthy men [28]. 10 men with normal sperm counts [29].
Sources
[28], [29]
Caveats
Two studies of 10 men each, neither with a control group.
Saw palmettoLimitedStudied in men

Testosterone

Limited evidence: blood testosterone did not change after 30 days in 20 men with an enlarged prostate. Prostate tissue studies found less DHT on saw palmetto.

Compared with before treatment, in the same men [10]; untreated men having the same surgery [11]; placebo [12]

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 20 men aged 50 to 75 with an enlarged prostate, 160 mg twice a day for 30 days did not change plasma testosterone, FSH or LH [10]. In prostate tissue from men given 320 mg a day for 3 months, DHT was lower and testosterone higher than in untreated men, mainly in the periurethral region [11]. In a 6-month randomized trial of a saw palmetto herbal blend, prostate tissue DHT fell modestly but significantly against placebo [12].
Population
20 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, mean age 67 [10]. Men having prostate surgery, treated or untreated [11]. 40 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia [12].
Sources
[10], [11], [12]
Caveats
The blood hormone study was small, short and had no control group [10]. The tissue studies measured hormones inside the prostate, not in the blood, and one tested a herbal blend [12]. No study in men without prostate disease was located.
TENSLimitedStudied in women

Period pain, compared with pain medicines and other treatments

Limited evidence: in single small trials, period pain did not differ between TENS and acetaminophen in women. Too few trials compared TENS with NSAIDs for pain.

Compared with acetaminophen [5]; acupressure [5]; interferential current therapy [5]

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pain did not differ between high-frequency TENS and acetaminophen (MD -0.98, 95% CI -3.30 to 1.34, 1 trial, 20 women) or low-frequency TENS and acetaminophen (MD -1.48, 95% CI -3.61 to 0.65). Nor did it differ against acupressure (MD -0.66, 18 women) or interferential current (MD -0.03, 95% CI -1.04 to 0.98, 2 trials, 62 women) [5].
Population
18 to 62 women per comparison [5].
Sources
[5]
Caveats
Very low certainty, from one or two trials per comparison [5].
Tongkat aliLimitedStudied in men

Erectile function

Limited evidence: pooled trials found no change in erectile function over placebo, though men with lower starting scores improved about 2 points.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Pooling 2 RCTs (139 participants), the change in IIEF-5 score at 12 weeks did not differ from placebo (WMD 0.91, 95% CI -1.50 to 3.33, I² 89.5%). Men with lower baseline scores improved by 2.15 points (95% CI 1.03 to 3.27) [3]. In a 6-month trial of 45 men with androgen deficiency, the largest improvement came with 200 mg a day combined with concurrent training [4]. A systematic review of 11 human studies found 7 reported an effect on male sexual health and 4 did not [5].
Population
Men with erectile dysfunction [3]; men averaging 47 years with androgen deficiency [4]; mixed designs [5].
Sources
[3], [4], [5]
Caveats
The trial in [4] had no supplement-only or training-only group.
Total testosteroneLimitedStudied in men

Time of day

One study found testosterone 20 to 25% lower at 4 p.m. than at 8 a.m. in men aged 30 to 40, and 10% lower at age 70.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
A blood sample drawn at 8 a.m. from the same men
Effect
In men sampled on three mornings and three afternoons, testosterone at 4 p.m. was 20 to 25% lower than at 8 a.m. at ages 30 to 40, and 10% lower at age 70. Seventeen men had at least one afternoon result below 300 ng/dL while all three of their morning results were normal [27]. Guidelines differ on the window: two measurements in the early morning for the American Urological Association, 07:00 to 10:00 for the European Association of Urology and 07:00 to 11:00 for an earlier joint statement [3][5][7].
Population
66 men aged 30 to 80 in Boston who completed at least five visits [27].
Sources
[27], [3], [5], [7]
Caveats
One study of 66 men. The authors conclude that the result supports restricting measurement to morning hours in both young and older men [27].
Total testosteroneLimitedStudied in men

Fasting against not fasting

One study found a glucose drink lowered testosterone by 25% within 2 hours, and guidelines disagree on whether the test requires fasting.

The numbers and sources
Compared with
The same men's fasting sample
Effect
In 74 men given a 75 g oral glucose load, mean testosterone fell 25% and remained lower at 120 minutes (13.7 against 16.5 nmol/L at baseline). Of 66 men with normal levels at baseline, 10 (15%) fell below 9.7 nmol/L at one or more time points [28]. The Endocrine Society and the European Association of Urology call for a fasting morning sample [2][5]. The American Urological Association judges the evidence that food affects testosterone to be particularly weak and does not ask clinicians to insist on fasting [3]. The British Society for Sexual Medicine cites levels up to 30% higher when fasting, cites one UK review of 213 patients that found no significant effect, and takes a pragmatic approach [6].
Population
74 men aged 19 to 74 with normal glucose tolerance, impaired glucose tolerance or newly found type 2 diabetes [28].
Sources
[28], [2], [5], [3], [6]
Caveats
One study of a glucose drink, not an ordinary meal. The fall did not differ by glucose tolerance or body mass index [28].
Uterine fibroid proceduresLimited

Pregnancy after focused ultrasound

Linked to lower pregnancy and live birth rates than myomectomy in pooled studies, live births 17% against 44%, with no head-to-head trials.

Compared with women who had myomectomy, in separate studies [13]

The numbers and sources
Effect
After high-intensity focused ultrasound, the pooled pregnancy rate was 23.3% (95% CI 11.5 to 37.6) and live birth rate 17.3% (95% CI 7.8 to 29.3), against 56.9% (95% CI 45.6 to 67.9) and 44.1% (95% CI 34.9 to 53.4) after myomectomy. Studies of younger women and of women trying to conceive reported better outcomes [13].
Population
Published studies of women with fibroids up to March 2024 [13].
Sources
[13]
Caveats
The groups come from different studies, which differ in age and in whether women were trying to conceive. The authors call for comparative trials [13].
Vitamin B6LimitedStudied in women

Cyclic breast pain

Limited evidence: breast pain did not differ from placebo across 3 low-quality trials.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Across 3 trials, breast pain intensity did not differ between vitamin B6 and placebo (SMD -3.57, 95% CI -9.15 to 2.01) [6].
Population
Otherwise healthy women with breast pain, 3 placebo-controlled trials [6].
Sources
[6]
Caveats
The authors rated the certainty very low and the trials low quality. Heterogeneity was extreme (I² 99.56%) [6].
Vitamin ELimitedStudied in women

PMS symptoms

One small trial found PMS scores on vitamin E did not differ from placebo after 2 months.

Compared with placebo [22]

The numbers and sources
Effect
On 100 mg of vitamin E a day for 2 months, PMS scores fell in all three groups (vitamin D, vitamin E and placebo), and the differences between groups were not significant (P > 0.05) [22]. A later review notes that only 36 of the 86 women completed the trial [23].
Population
86 women with PMS randomized to vitamin D, vitamin E or placebo [22].
Sources
[22], [23]
Caveats
One small trial with many dropouts [23].

Checked, no increase found21

Letrozole and clomipheneStrong

Miscarriage

Not shown to differ between letrozole and clomiphene. About one pregnancy in four ended in miscarriage on either drug in pooled PCOS trials.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Miscarriage per pregnancy was 25% on selective estrogen receptor modulators and 24% on letrozole (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.32, high certainty) [3]. Pregnancy loss did not differ between letrozole and clomiphene across fertility trials (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.50) [16] or in unexplained infertility (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.38) [10]. In PPCOS II, 31.8% of letrozole pregnancies and 29.1% of clomiphene pregnancies were lost [5]. The clomiphene label reports a miscarriage rate of 20.4% and a stillbirth rate of 1.0% in its trials [1], and the letrozole label gives a US background miscarriage rate of 15% to 20% of recognized pregnancies [2].
Population
736 pregnancies in 15 trials [3]. 20 trials [16]. 8 trials [10]. 257 pregnancies [5]. 2,369 pregnancies in label trials [1].
Sources
[3], [16], [10], [5], [1], [2]
Caveats
These trials compare the two drugs with each other, so they cannot show whether either changes miscarriage risk against no drug.
BupropionStrong

Sexual side effects

Not shown to raise sexual side effects above placebo in two meta-analyses, unlike SSRIs in the same trials.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
A meta-analysis of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction found no significant difference between bupropion and placebo [23]. In seven trials, SSRIs produced more sexual side effects than bupropion or placebo, and bupropion produced no more than placebo [1]. In trials of the immediate-release form, decreased libido was reported by 3% against 2% on placebo [8].
Population
Antidepressant studies pooled by drug [23]; adults in 7 randomized trials of bupropion, SSRIs and placebo [1]; adults in immediate-release trials at 300 to 600 mg a day [8].
Sources
[23], [1], [8]
Caveats
The band above is the label rate for decreased libido, which sat close to placebo. Neither meta-analysis abstract gives the bupropion rate.
BupropionModerateStudied in pregnancy

Pregnancy

Not linked to more birth defects overall. The pregnancy registry rate of heart defects was 1.3%, close to the background rate of about 1%.

The numbers and sources
How common
Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
Effect
A meta-analysis of four studies put the pooled share of congenital malformations among live-born infants exposed to bupropion at 1.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 3.0), with mean birth weight of 3,306 g and mean gestation of 39.2 weeks [26]. The label reports no increase in malformations overall in a registry of 675 first-trimester exposures and a database study of 1,213. Cardiovascular malformations occurred in 1.3% of registry pregnancies, against a background rate of about 1% [8].
Population
18 studies, including 2 RCTs and 11 cohorts, of bupropion or varenicline in pregnancy [26]; 675 and 1,213 first-trimester exposures [8].
Sources
[26], [8]
Caveats
The review rated the available evidence poor in quality, with high heterogeneity (I² 81%), and found no strong evidence of either harm or absence of harm [26]. The label notes the registry suggested a possible increase in heart defects that later studies did not confirm overall [8].
SpironolactoneModerate

Breast and other cancers

Not linked to breast cancer in women over 55, at 0.39% a year against 0.38% in unexposed women, or to other cancers in a pooled analysis.

The numbers and sources
How common
Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
Effect
In a UK cohort of women over 55, breast cancer occurred at 0.39% a year in those prescribed spironolactone and 0.38% in matched unexposed women (adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.12) [18]. A meta-analysis of 7 observational studies found no significant association with breast cancer (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.22), ovarian, bladder, kidney, gastric or esophageal cancer, and a lower risk of prostate cancer (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.90) [19].
Population
28,032 exposed and 55,961 unexposed women followed a mean 4.1 years [18]; 4,528,332 people in 7 studies, mean ages 62.6 to 72.0 [19].
Sources
[18], [19]
Caveats
Observational, with certainty rated low or very low, and few younger women [19]. The label reports that spironolactone caused tumors in rats at high doses [3].
AntihistaminesModerate

Pregnancy

Not linked to major birth defects, miscarriage, prematurity or low birth weight after first-trimester use, in a meta-analysis of 37 studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In cohort studies, major malformations were not more common after first-trimester H1 antihistamine exposure (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.16), and case-control studies agreed (OR 1.05). Miscarriage (OR 1.00), prematurity (OR 0.96), stillbirth (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.18) and low birth weight (OR 1.20) did not differ [19]. The levocetirizine label states human data are insufficient to identify a drug-associated risk [1].
Population
37 studies of first-trimester exposure [19].
Sources
[19], [1]
Caveats
The meta-analysis pooled H1 antihistamines as a class. Observational data [19].
GingerModerate

Outcomes in pregnancy

Miscarriage did not differ significantly from placebo in pregnant women, but the wide interval does not rule out a raised risk.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Spontaneous abortion did not differ significantly from placebo (RR 3.14, 95% CI 0.65 to 15.11) or vitamin B6 (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.42). Heartburn and drowsiness did not differ [1].
Population
1,278 pregnant women in 12 RCTs [1].
Sources
[1]
Caveats
The interval against placebo is very wide, so a raised risk is not ruled out. Trials were not sized to detect rare events.
InsulinModerateStudied in pregnancy

Pregnancy

Not linked to more harm to the baby with glargine than with NPH insulin in pregnancy, in two meta-analyses of mostly observational studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Across eight studies of women with diabetes in pregnancy, fetal outcomes did not differ significantly between insulin glargine and NPH insulin [23]. A second meta-analysis of 24 studies found similar birth weights, severe maternal hypoglycemia and neonatal intensive care admission with glargine and NPH, and similar outcomes with aspart and regular insulin. Lispro was associated with higher birth weight and more large-for-gestational-age births than regular insulin (RR 1.42) and with less severe maternal hypoglycemia (RR 0.33) [24]. The glargine label states that published studies have not reported a clear association with adverse developmental outcomes, and that poorly controlled diabetes in pregnancy carries risks to mother and fetus [5].
Population
702 women with pregestational or gestational diabetes in eight studies [23]; 3,734 women in 24 studies [24].
Sources
[23], [24], [5]
Caveats
Mostly observational studies comparing one insulin with another. The label gives the background risk of major birth defects as 6% to 10% in women with pregestational diabetes and an HbA1c above 7 around conception [5].
MetforminModerate

Use in pregnancy and by fathers

Linked to fewer birth malformations than insulin when used in pregnancy, and not linked to malformations when fathers used it. Child BMI was similar by age 4.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Against insulin, metformin in pregnancy was associated with fewer congenital malformations overall (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.99) [26]. Paternal use during sperm development was not associated with major congenital malformations in 4 studies (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.21) [27]. Children exposed in the womb had BMI similar to unexposed children at a weighted mean age of 4.4 years (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.07). BMI was slightly higher at 1 to 3 years (SMD 0.15) and in the polycystic ovary syndrome subgroup (SMD 0.31) [28].
Population
RCTs and cohort studies of maternal use [26]; more than 11,000 children whose fathers used metformin [27]; 7,975 exposed children and more than 1 million unexposed [28].
Sources
[26], [27], [28]
Caveats
Mostly observational. [28] rated its certainty low.
MirtazapineModerate

Sexual side effects

Not shown to raise sexual dysfunction above placebo in a meta-analysis, and less likely to cause it than SSRIs in head-to-head depression trials.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
A meta-analysis of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction found no significant difference from placebo for mirtazapine, while ten other antidepressants had rates from 25.8% to 80.3% [16]. In a Cochrane review, mirtazapine was less likely than SSRIs to cause sexual dysfunction [2].
Population
Studies of antidepressants reporting sexual dysfunction [16]; 2,626 participants in 12 trials against SSRIs [2].
Sources
[16], [2]
Caveats
The abstracts give no rate for mirtazapine. The meta-analysis included open-label studies and varied rating scales.
Proton pump inhibitorsModerateStudied in pregnancy

Pregnancy

Not linked to major birth defects or miscarriage in observational studies summarized on the labels, including a meta-analysis of first-trimester use.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The pantoprazole label cites a meta-analysis of 1,530 women exposed in at least the first trimester and 133,410 unexposed, with no significant rise in major malformations (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.45) or miscarriage (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.97). It states observational limits cannot establish or exclude a risk, and that rat studies showed bone changes in exposed pups [3]. The esomeprazole label states epidemiologic data on first-trimester omeprazole show no increase in major malformations [7].
Population
Pregnancy cohorts and a meta-analysis summarized in labeling [3][7].
Sources
[3], [7]
Caveats
Observational data only [3].
Soy foodsModerateStudied in women

Stimulation of the womb lining

Not shown to stimulate the womb lining or vagina in women using phytoestrogen products for up to two years, in a Cochrane review.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The Cochrane review found no evidence that phytoestrogen treatments, including dietary soy and soy extracts, caused estrogen-like stimulation of the endometrium or vagina or other adverse effects when used for up to two years [8].
Population
Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women in 43 trials [8].
Sources
[8]
Caveats
Most trials were of supplements and lasted under two years [8].
AlbuterolLimited

Pregnancy

The label states epidemiological studies do not consistently show a risk of major birth defects or miscarriage with inhaled albuterol. Animal studies at high doses found cleft palate.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
There are no randomized studies in pregnancy. Epidemiological studies and postmarketing case reports do not consistently demonstrate a risk of major birth defects or miscarriage. In mice and rabbits, cleft palate and delayed bone formation occurred at less than the maximum human inhaled dose. The label also notes that poorly controlled asthma raises risks such as preeclampsia and prematurity [1].
Population
Epidemiological studies and animal studies summarized in labeling [1].
Sources
[1]
Caveats
Observational human data only [1].
9 more
ClonidineLimitedStudied in pregnancy

Pregnancy

The labels state decades of use in pregnancy have not identified a raised risk of birth defects or miscarriage with clonidine or guanfacine, though guanfacine use has been infrequent.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Published experience with clonidine in pregnancy, including controlled trials, a retrospective cohort and case reports, has not identified a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Rats and mice had more resorptions at high doses [6]. Data on guanfacine have not identified a risk, but its use in pregnancy has been infrequent [7].
Population
Published literature summarized in the labels [6][7].
Sources
[6], [7]
Caveats
The labels give no counts of exposed pregnancies.
H2 blockersLimited

Pregnancy

The famotidine label states data in pregnant women are insufficient to establish a drug-associated risk. Animal studies at high doses found no fetal harm.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states available data on H2 blockers, including famotidine, are insufficient to establish a risk of major birth defects, miscarriage or other adverse outcomes. Rat and rabbit studies at up to about 243 and 122 times the human dose showed no adverse developmental effects [2].
Population
Labeling summary of human and animal data [2].
Sources
[2]
Caveats
No controlled studies in pregnant women [2].
Horny goat weedLimited

Safety in controlled trials

Small trials in postmenopausal women found no significant adverse symptoms or lab changes. Osteoporosis trials reported mild gut or skin reactions.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In 58 postmenopausal women over 6 weeks, Epimedium prenylflavonoids caused no significant adverse symptoms and no changes in liver, blood or kidney tests [3]. Over 24 months, the icariin blend showed no detectable endometrial hyperplasia [1]. In 10 osteoporosis RCTs, adverse reactions were described as low, mainly mild gastrointestinal reactions or skin allergies [4].
Population
Postmenopausal women [1][3]; patients with osteoporosis [4].
Sources
[1], [3], [4]
Caveats
Trials in women for bone outcomes. No safety data in men using it for sexual function were located.
Inhaled corticosteroidsLimitedStudied in pregnancy

Pregnancy

The budesonide-formoterol label states that studies of pregnant women have not shown inhaled budesonide raises the risk of birth abnormalities. Animal studies at some doses did.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states studies of pregnant women have not shown that inhaled budesonide alone increases the risk of abnormalities. There are no adequate studies of formoterol or the combination in pregnancy. In rats, the inhaled combination was teratogenic below the maximum human dose [16].
Population
Human pregnancy studies and animal studies summarized in labeling [16].
Sources
[16]
Caveats
The label notes rodents are more prone than humans to steroid birth effects [16].
LevothyroxineLimitedStudied in women

Breast cancer

Limited evidence: case-control studies found no statistically significant link to breast cancer, and certainty was rated low.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In 4 case-control studies, thyroid hormone treatment had an odds ratio for breast cancer of 1.43 (95% CI 0.90 to 2.28), which was not statistically significant. Heterogeneity was high (I² 94.3%), and the authors rated certainty low [15].
Population
221,254 women on thyroid hormone and 4,385,666 controls [15].
Sources
[15]
Caveats
Observational studies with substantial heterogeneity and possible confounding [15].
MontelukastLimitedStudied in pregnancy

Pregnancy

The label states cohort studies over decades have not established a risk of major birth defects with montelukast. Animal studies at about 100 times human exposure found no developmental harm.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states published prospective and retrospective cohort studies have not identified an association with major birth defects, while noting small samples and inconsistent comparator groups. Rats and rabbits showed no adverse developmental effects at about 100 and 110 times the human exposure [1].
Population
Pregnancy cohorts and animal studies summarized in labeling [1].
Sources
[1]
Caveats
Observational studies with methodological limits [1].
TrazodoneLimited

Pregnancy

Not linked to birth defects or miscarriage in the published cohort studies, case series and case reports summarized in the label.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
The label states that published prospective cohort studies, case series and case reports over several decades have not identified drug-associated risks of major birth defects, miscarriage or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. In animals, fetal harm was seen at about 7 to 22 times the maximum human dose [12].
Population
Published studies and reports of use in pregnant women, summarized in labeling without counts [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
The label gives no numbers, and the underlying studies are small.
Ulipristal acetateLimited

Use in pregnancy

The ella label contraindicates use in known or suspected pregnancy and states postmarketing studies found no signal of pregnancy complications after exposure.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Ella is not indicated to end an existing pregnancy, and the label advises evaluation for ectopic pregnancy in women who become pregnant or have lower abdominal pain after use. Postmarketing studies found no signal of concern for pregnancy complications [9]. In the fibroid case series, 5 pregnancies began during ulipristal use, with 3 live births, 1 miscarriage and 1 termination [10].
Population
Postmarketing studies summarized in the label [9]; 5 pregnancies conceived during use [10].
Sources
[9], [10]
Caveats
Observational postmarketing data. Five pregnancies cannot give a rate.
SaunaModerate

Core temperature in pregnancy

No pregnant woman reached a core temperature of 39.0°C across 12 studies of exercise, hot baths and sauna. Mean core temperature after sauna was 37.6°C.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A systematic review of 12 studies (347 pregnant women) found the highest individual core temperature was 38.9°C, during land-based exercise. The highest mean end-of-trial core temperature for sauna exposure was 37.6°C (95% CI 37.5 to 37.7), in sessions of up to 20 minutes at 70°C and 15% relative humidity [42].
Population
347 pregnant women at any stage of pregnancy in 12 studies [42].
Sources
[42]
Caveats
The studies measured core temperature against a proposed threshold of 39.0°C, not birth outcomes. Sauna exposures were no longer than 20 minutes and no hotter than 70°C, cooler than many of the protocols on this page.

Not studied in people25

CordycepsUntested

Libido and sexual function

Not studied in people. In diabetic male rats, Cordyceps militaris improved mating behavior and testosterone, and Cordyceps sinensis raised testosterone in mice.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies, lab studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In male rats made diabetic with streptozotocin, 21 days of Cordyceps militaris improved sperm measures, serum testosterone and copulatory behavior compared with untreated diabetic rats [10]. Cordyceps sinensis and two of its extracted fractions raised testosterone production in isolated mouse Leydig cells and raised plasma testosterone in live mice [11].
Population
Wistar rats, healthy and diabetic [10]. Mice and mouse Leydig cells [11].
Sources
[10], [11]
Caveats
Animal and cell findings do not show an effect on desire or sexual function in people. No human trial of Cordyceps for libido was located in Europe PMC.
D-aspartic acidUntestedStudied in men

Libido

Not studied in people. The claim rests on raising testosterone, which rose in one 12-day trial and in rats but not in later trials in trained men.

No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body, animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 23 men given sodium D-aspartate for 12 days and in rats, LH and testosterone release rose [1]. Later trials in resistance-trained men found no rise in testosterone at 3 g a day for 28 days, and a fall at 6 g a day for 14 days [2][3]. Where testosterone is low, raising it does change desire: in 790 men aged 65 or older with low testosterone, a year of testosterone gel raised sexual desire, activity and erectile function against placebo [8]. No study measured libido in people taking D-aspartic acid.
Population
Men and rats [1]. Resistance-trained men [2][3]. 790 older men with low testosterone, given testosterone itself [8].
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [8]
Caveats
The testosterone trial tested the hormone, not D-aspartic acid, in men with low levels [8]. D-aspartic acid's effect on testosterone is itself inconsistent [1][2][3].
Fish oilUntested

Fibroids

Not studied in people. In the lab, EPA and DHA changed the membranes of human fibroid cells and lowered genes tied to mechanical signaling and lipid handling.

No study in people. This rests on lab studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In primary human fibroid and normal uterine muscle cells, EPA or DHA raised polyunsaturated fat content, lowered membrane fluidity, and reduced expression of ABCG1, ABCA1 and AKAP13. Genes for extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen and fibronectin did not change [50].
Population
Primary human fibroid and uterine muscle cells [50].
Sources
[50]
Caveats
Cell studies only. No trial of fish oil in women with fibroids or heavy bleeding was located, and cohorts of omega-3 from food give mixed results (see Risks).
Heat therapyUntested

Endometriosis pain

Not studied in people. Users report: 70% of 484 Australian women with endometriosis used heat, rating it 6.5 out of 10 for pain relief.

No study in people. This rests on what users report.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a national online survey, heat was the most common self-management strategy (70%), with a mean self-rated effectiveness for pain of 6.52 on a 10-point scale [12]. A narrative review notes that women with endometriosis frequently use heating devices for period and pelvic pain [13].
Population
484 women aged 18 to 45 in Australia with confirmed endometriosis, recruited through support groups [12].
Sources
[12], [13]
Caveats
A self-selected survey with no comparison group. No trial of heat for endometriosis pain was located.
Horny goat weedUntested

Erectile function

Not studied in people. Used traditionally for impotence, its extract and icariin block the PDE5 enzyme in the lab, and icariin protected penile tissue in diabetic rats.

No study in people. This rests on lab studies, animal studies, documented traditional use.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In a screen of plant extracts traditionally used for male impotence, Epimedium brevicornum extract inhibited human PDE5, the enzyme sildenafil blocks, by 80% at 50 µg/mL, and icariin had an IC50 of 5.9 µM, about 80 times weaker than sildenafil [9]. In diabetic rats, 3 months of icariin partially preserved the smooth muscle and blood vessel lining of the penis that diabetes damaged [10].
Population
Human recombinant enzyme in the lab [9]. Diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats [10].
Sources
[9], [10]
Caveats
Lab enzyme activity and rat tissue do not show an effect on erections in people. No controlled trial in men was located.
Horny goat weedUntested

Libido

Not studied in people. Male mice given icariin for 21 days mated sooner and more often than untreated mice.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies, documented traditional use.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In 48 male mice, 21 days of icariin shortened the time to mounting and ejaculation and raised the number of both compared with controls, along with higher serum testosterone, nitric oxide and brain dopamine (all p < 0.05) [11]. The plant is among extracts traditionally used for male impotence [9].
Population
Male CD1 mice [11].
Sources
[11], [9]
Caveats
Mating behavior in mice is not human desire. No study of libido in people was located.
Horny goat weedUntested

Testosterone

Not studied in people. Icariin raised serum testosterone in male mice and increased testosterone production in mouse testis cells.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies, lab studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
Male mice given icariin for 21 days had higher serum testosterone than controls (p < 0.001) [11]. In mouse Leydig cells, the testosterone-producing cells of the testis, icariin raised the enzymes for testosterone synthesis through an estrogen receptor pathway, and it reversed the fall in those enzymes caused by a phthalate in live mice [12].
Population
Male mice and mouse Leydig cells [11][12].
Sources
[11], [12]
Caveats
No study measured testosterone in people taking horny goat weed or icariin. Animal and cell findings do not show the effect of a supplement in men.
Red light therapyUntested

Testosterone

Not studied in people. Animal results disagree: a review reports low-level laser raised testosterone in heat-damaged testes, while a study in rams found no rise.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A 2025 review of preclinical studies reports that low-level laser therapy eased heat-induced low sperm counts in animal models, in part by raising serum testosterone, and describes light acting through mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase and ATP production [41]. In rams with heat-damaged testes, 808 nm laser at 28 J/cm² did not raise plasma testosterone (P = 0.37) and lowered sperm motility and membrane integrity [42].
Population
Animal models of testicular heat injury [41]. Rams [42].
Sources
[41], [42]
Caveats
The review's abstract does not give species or effect sizes [41]. The ram study aimed laser light at the testes, not a whole-body panel [42]. No study of red light and testosterone in people was located.
TurmericUntested

Fibroids

Not studied in people. Animal studies found curcumin in the diet slowed human fibroid tissue grown in mice and cut spontaneous fibroids in hens.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies, lab studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In hens, which develop fibroids naturally, 12 months of dietary curcumin at 25.8 or 53 mg per kg cut fibroid incidence from 58.9% to 37.7% and 24.5% (P 0.004) and slowed tumor growth [53]. In mice carrying human fibroid tissue, a curcumin diet led to about 60% less growth, less matrix protein and more cell death in the tissue [54]. In the lab, curcumin slowed the growth of human fibroid cells, did not slow matched normal uterine muscle cells, and lowered fibronectin [55]. It also slowed the growth of rat fibroid cells, acting through PPAR-gamma [56].
Population
270 hens [53]; mice with human fibroid xenografts [54]; immortalized human fibroid and uterine muscle cells [55]; Eker rat fibroid cells [56].
Sources
[53], [54], [55], [56]
Caveats
Animal and cell studies. Doses per kilogram in hens and mice do not carry over directly to people, and no trial in women with fibroids or heavy bleeding was located.
Vitex (chasteberry)Untested

Fibroids

Not studied in people. A 2026 review lists vitex among herbs commonly used in traditional herbal formulas for fibroids.

No study in people. This rests on documented traditional use.

The numbers and sources
Effect
A review of ethnopharmacology for fibroids names Vitex agnus-castus among herbs commonly used in African, Asian and Latin American herbal formulas said to reduce fibroid size and regulate menstruation [8]. No trial of vitex for fibroid size or fibroid bleeding was found.
Population
Traditional herbal practice described in a literature review [8].
Sources
[8]
Caveats
Traditional use shows that people have used it, not that it changes fibroids. The pooled trials of menstrual blood loss found no effect against placebo [6].
SGLT2 inhibitorsUntestedHow often is not known

Pregnancy

Not studied in people. Animal studies found reversible kidney changes in young rats exposed during the period matching the second and third trimesters.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
In juvenile rats, empagliflozin at about 13 times the maximum clinical dose caused increased kidney weights and dilated kidney tubules and pelvis, which were not seen after a 13-week recovery period. Doses given to rats and rabbits during the period matching the first trimester did not cause developmental harm at up to 48 and 128 times the clinical dose. On this basis the label advises against use in the second and third trimesters [20].
Population
Rats and rabbits [20].
Sources
[20]
Caveats
Animal doses were far above human doses, and no study in pregnant women was sourced.
Alpha-blockersUntested

Use in pregnancy

Not studied in people. Animal studies of doxazosin found no birth defects at usual multiples of human exposure, with lower fetal survival in rabbits at the highest dose.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The doxazosin label states that limited data in pregnant women are not enough to inform the risk of birth defects or miscarriage. In rats and rabbits given doxazosin during organogenesis at 4 to 10 times human exposure, no adverse developmental effects were seen, and 82 mg/kg a day reduced fetal survival in rabbits [7].
Population
Rats and rabbits [7].
Sources
[7]
Caveats
Animal data only. Tamsulosin, alfuzosin and silodosin are labeled for men with BPH.
13 more
Atomoxetine and viloxazineUntested

Pregnancy

Not studied in people. Animal studies found fewer live rabbit fetuses on atomoxetine and fetal toxicity in rats on viloxazine. Human data are insufficient.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The atomoxetine label states published human data are insufficient, and one of three rabbit studies found fewer live fetuses and more early resorptions [9]. The viloxazine label states case series are insufficient, and animal studies found fetal toxicity and delayed development in rats and maternal toxicity in rabbits at doses near the maximum labeled dose [6].
Population
Pregnant rabbits, rats and mice (animal) [9][6].
Sources
[9], [6]
Caveats
Animal data do not show what happens in human pregnancy.
BisphosphonatesUntested

Use in pregnancy

Not studied in people. Animal studies of alendronate found reduced pup survival and bone formation, and bisphosphonates stay in bone for years after stopping.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The alendronate label states human data are insufficient. In rats, alendronate reduced survival after implantation and pup weight gain at under half the highest human dose, and reduced fetal bone formation at 3 times it, with maternal low calcium causing delivery problems. Because bisphosphonates are released from bone over years, the label notes a possible risk to a fetus if pregnancy follows a course of treatment [15].
Population
Rats and rabbits [15].
Sources
[15]
Caveats
Animal data and mechanism only.
BuspironeUntested

Pregnancy

Not studied in people. Animal studies found no fertility impairment or fetal damage at about 30 times the maximum human dose.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The label states that reproduction studies in rats and rabbits at about 30 times the maximum labeled human dose showed no fertility impairment or fetal damage, and that adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women have not been performed [4].
Population
Rats and rabbits [4].
Sources
[4]
Caveats
Animal reproduction studies do not always predict what happens in people, as the label itself notes.
CGRP migraine drugsUntested

Pregnancy

Not studied in people. Animal studies found no harm to monkey offspring from erenumab, and lower fetal weight in rats at high gepant doses.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The labels state there are no adequate data in pregnant women. No adverse effects on offspring were seen when pregnant monkeys received erenumab at exposures above human levels [12]. Rimegepant lowered fetal weight and raised skeletal variations in rats at exposures above clinical levels with maternal toxicity [6], and atogepant lowered fetal weight and bone formation in rats at the two highest doses [16].
Population
Pregnant monkeys and rats (animal) [12][6][16].
Sources
[12], [6], [16]
Caveats
Animal data do not show what happens in human pregnancy.
DulaglutideUntested

Pregnancy

Not studied in people. Animal studies found fetal losses, slower fetal growth and malformations at doses above human exposure, alongside reduced maternal eating.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The label states human data are not sufficient to determine a drug-associated risk. In rats, early embryonic deaths, reduced fetal growth and abnormalities occurred at 6 or more times human exposure at 4.5 mg, and in rabbits major fetal abnormalities at 5 times, with reduced maternal food intake and weight [1].
Population
Pregnant rats and rabbits (animal), as reported in the label [1].
Sources
[1]
Caveats
Animal findings at exposures above the human dose, linked to reduced maternal eating [1].
Ezetimibe and fenofibrateUntested

Use in pregnancy

Not studied in people. Animal studies found no birth defects from ezetimibe or from fenofibrate at usual doses, with harm from fenofibrate only at doses toxic to the mother.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The ezetimibe label states human data are insufficient, and rats and rabbits showed no developmental effects at 10 and 150 times human exposure [2]. The fenofibrate label states human data are insufficient, with no embryo or fetal toxicity in rats and rabbits at doses up to the 145 mg human dose and adverse outcomes at higher doses with maternal toxicity [7].
Population
Rats and rabbits [2][7].
Sources
[2], [7]
Caveats
Animal data only. With a statin, the statin label also applies [2].
GnRH drugs for fibroidsUntested

Pregnancy

Not studied in people. Relugolix caused pregnancy loss in rabbits, and both combination labels contraindicate use in pregnancy. Reduced bleeding can delay noticing a pregnancy.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In pregnant rabbits, relugolix caused spontaneous abortion and total litter loss at about half the human exposure, with no fetal malformations in rabbits or rats [2]. The labels state limited human data are insufficient to evaluate risk, that the drugs may cause early pregnancy loss, and that amenorrhea may delay recognizing pregnancy [2][6]. The Lupron Depot label also warns of embryo-fetal toxicity [10].
Population
Rabbits and rats [2]; label statements [6][10].
Sources
[2], [6], [10]
Caveats
Animal findings do not show what happens in human pregnancy.
Ketamine and esketamineUntested

Pregnancy

Not studied in people. In animal studies, ketamine-type drugs raised nerve cell death in the developing primate brain, and the label states esketamine may cause fetal harm.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The label states there are insufficient data in pregnant women. Drugs that block NMDA receptors raised nerve cell death in the developing brain of offspring when given to pregnant primates. Intranasal ketamine caused skeletal malformations in rabbits at doses toxic to the mother, and esketamine delayed development in rat pups. On these animal findings, the label states esketamine may cause fetal harm [4].
Population
Pregnant primates, rabbits and rats (animal) [4].
Sources
[4]
Caveats
No human pregnancy outcome data are given in the label.
Loop diureticsUntested

Use in pregnancy

Not studied in people. Animal studies found unexplained maternal deaths and miscarriages in rabbits given furosemide at 2 to 8 times the top human dose.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The furosemide label states there are no adequate controlled studies in pregnant women. Furosemide caused unexplained maternal deaths and abortions in rabbits at 2, 4 and 8 times the maximum human dose on the label, and the label advises monitoring fetal growth because of the potential for higher birth weights [10].
Population
Rabbits, rats and mice [10].
Sources
[10]
Caveats
Animal data only.
StatinsUntested

Male reproductive effects in animals

Not studied in people. In healthy male rodents, statins were linked to lower sperm quality and testosterone, with the opposite in diseased rodents.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
In healthy male rodents, statin exposure was linked to lower sperm quality, lower testosterone production and delayed puberty. In diseased rodents, findings went the other way [14].
Population
Male rats and mice (animal), plus in vitro studies [14].
Sources
[14]
Caveats
Animal and in vitro data only. No human reproductive outcomes were measured [14].
Tranexamic acidUntested

Use in pregnancy

Not studied in people as a pregnancy treatment. Animal reproduction studies found no adverse developmental outcomes, and the drug crosses the placenta.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
The label states there are no data on tablet use in pregnant women to evaluate birth defects, miscarriage or other outcomes, that the drug is not indicated in pregnancy, and that animal reproduction studies did not identify adverse developmental outcomes. Cord blood levels after an intravenous dose matched maternal levels [4].
Population
Animal reproduction studies and pharmacokinetic data summarized in the label [4].
Sources
[4]
Caveats
Animal data do not show what happens in human pregnancy. The postpartum trial gave the drug after birth, not during pregnancy [7].
Vitex (chasteberry)Untested

Use in pregnancy and breastfeeding

Not studied in people. NCCIH cautions that preclinical evidence points to possible harm from use during pregnancy or breastfeeding.

No study in people. This rests on animal studies.

The numbers and sources
Effect
NCCIH cautions that some preclinical evidence points to possible harm from chasteberry use during pregnancy or breastfeeding [10]. The 2005 safety review's authors advised against use in pregnancy or lactation [9].
Population
Preclinical studies summarized by NCCIH [10].
Sources
[10], [9]
Caveats
No study in pregnant or breastfeeding women was found.
Vitex (chasteberry)Untested

Hormone-sensitive conditions

Not studied in people. NCCIH cautions it may carry risk for women with hormone-sensitive conditions such as breast, uterine or ovarian cancer.

No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.

The numbers and sources
Effect
NCCIH cautions that chasteberry supplementation may carry risk for women with hormone-sensitive conditions, such as breast, uterine or ovarian cancer [10]. The EMA describes lab studies suggesting it acts on the hypothalamus and pituitary to lower prolactin [1].
Population
Statements from NCCIH and the EMA [10][1].
Sources
[10], [1]
Caveats
No study measured outcomes in women with these conditions.