Whole body
What research found here. What was shown to help comes first, then the risks reported, most common first.
Whole body
Strong several reviews agree · Moderate one review or consistent trials · Limited one or a few small studies · Untested no study in people, listed with what it rests on
Shown to help137
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at low levels in cohorts, 67% more below 12 ng/mL, while 52 pooled trials of vitamin D supplements found no fewer deaths.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In pooled individual data with standardized measurements, adjusted hazard ratios for death against a reference of 30 to 40 ng/mL (75 to 99.99 nmol/L) were 1.15 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.29) at 16 to 20 ng/mL, 1.33 (1.16 to 1.51) at 12 to 16 ng/mL and 1.67 (1.44 to 1.89) below 12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L). Risk was not significantly higher at levels up to 50 ng/mL (125 nmol/L) [8]. Across 73 cohort studies, the bottom third of baseline levels had a relative risk of death of 1.35 against the top third (95% CI 1.22 to 1.49) [9]. In 52 randomized trials, vitamin D supplementation was not associated with death from any cause (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.02) [10]. In a trial of 2,000 IU a day in 25,871 US adults, the hazard ratio for death was 0.99 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.12) [11].
- Population
- 26,916 participants in 8 European prospective studies, median age 61.6, 6,802 deaths over a median 10.5 years [8]. 849,412 participants in 73 cohort studies [9]. 75,454 participants in 52 trials [10]. 25,871 men aged 50 or older and women aged 55 or older [11].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- The cohort findings are observational, so confounding and reverse causation, where illness lowers the level, cannot be ruled out. An earlier pooled analysis of trials found fewer deaths with vitamin D3 (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.99) and not with vitamin D2 [9]. The Endocrine Society notes that average starting levels in many large trials were in a range most would consider adequate [3].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at higher levels, 38% more in the top third than the bottom third across pooled general population cohorts.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of general population cohorts, the relative risk of death from any cause was 1.38 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.63) comparing the top and bottom thirds of alkaline phosphatase, and 1.03 (1.01 to 1.06) per 5 U/L higher [8]. A second meta-analysis, in people with normal or preserved kidney function, found a non-linear association with a relative risk of 1.57 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.95) for the high group against the reference group [9]. In survivors of a heart attack, the top third had an adjusted hazard ratio for death of 1.43 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.89) against the bottom third, and the association was repeated in a US national survey sample [10].
- Population
- 19 cohorts with over 9.24 million participants and 242,953 deaths, which also covered other liver enzymes [8]. 24 studies with 147,634 participants [9]. 4,115 people with a previous heart attack and 14,716 US adults [10].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Observational. A raised total can come from liver or from bone [2]. In the heart attack cohort the excess risk was present in people without evidence of kidney disease and was highest in people with both alkaline phosphatase and serum phosphate raised [10].
Cortisol
Shown to lower cortisol by about 1.2 µg/dL against placebo in adults, though perceived stress did not change in the same review.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 7 trials, cortisol fell 1.16 µg/dL (95% CI -1.64 to -0.69) against placebo [4]. Across 23 placebo-controlled trials, cortisol fell (SMD -1.18, p < 0.04), with a possible dose-response by withanolide content [6]. A review of 23 trials of standardized root extract in healthy adults reported consistent cortisol reductions [7].
- Population
- Adults in RCTs of 2 weeks or more at 250 mg a day or more [4]. 1,706 adults in 23 RCTs [6]. 2,317 healthy adults [7].
- Sources
- [4], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- In the same review, cortisol fell while perceived stress did not change [4]. Cortisol is a lab marker, not a symptom. Two authors of [7] reported employment by companies, and two reported honoraria from supplement companies.
Death from any cause
Linked to about 15% lower death from any cause at 3 to 4 cups a day than no coffee, in pooled cohorts, including decaffeinated coffee.
Compared with people drinking no coffee [2][3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- An umbrella review of 201 meta-analyses found the largest relative risk reduction at 3 to 4 cups a day against none, for all-cause mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.88) [2]. A dose-response meta-analysis of 21 cohorts found the largest reduction at 4 cups a day, 16% (95% CI 13 to 18%) [4]. An update of 40 studies found the lowest risk at 3.5 cups a day (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.89), with no further fall at higher intakes. The link held by age, weight, smoking, alcohol and caffeine content of the coffee, and was weaker in the US than in Europe and Asia [3].
- Population
- 201 meta-analyses of observational studies and 17 of trials [2]. 997,464 participants and 121,915 deaths in 21 prospective studies [4]. 3,852,651 participants and 450,256 deaths in 40 studies [3].
- Sources
- [2], [4], [3], [5]
- Caveats
- Observational. Coffee drinkers differ from non-drinkers in smoking and other habits, and people who fall ill may stop drinking coffee, which can make coffee look protective (reverse causation). The umbrella review authors call for randomized trials to test cause [2]. A review of at least 15 Mendelian randomization studies found most gave no consistent support for coffee causing the health outcomes studied, while noting low statistical power [5].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at higher levels, and a cystatin C-based kidney estimate at least 30% below the creatinine-based one went with 69% more deaths.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In elderly US adults, hazard ratios for death rose across fifths of cystatin C, from 1.08 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.35) in the second fifth to 2.58 (2.03 to 3.27) in the top part of the highest fifth, while creatinine showed a J-shaped association [11]. In a meta-analysis of 16 cohorts, being reclassified to a lower kidney function category by cystatin C than by creatinine went with a higher risk of death, and to a higher category with a lower risk, with a net reclassification improvement for death of 0.23 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.28) [12]. In 440,526 UK adults, the cystatin C-based estimate of kidney function was the one most strongly associated with cardiovascular disease and death [13]. Across 23 outpatient cohorts, people whose cystatin C-based estimate was at least 30% lower than their creatinine-based one had 28.4 deaths per 1,000 person-years against 16.8 in those whose two estimates were within 30% (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.57 to 1.82) [14].
- Population
- 4,637 participants of the Cardiovascular Health Study [11]. 90,750 participants in 11 general-population studies and 2,960 in 5 cohorts with chronic kidney disease, 13,202 deaths [12]. 440,526 UK Biobank participants [13]. 821,327 people in 23 outpatient cohorts, mean follow-up 11 years [14].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Observational. Cystatin C rises with inflammation, smoking and other conditions apart from kidney function [2][15], so a high level may mark illness already present.
Death from any cause
Linked to progressively fewer deaths with more daily steps in pooled cohorts, leveling off at about 6,000 to 8,000 steps in adults 60 and older.
Compared with people in the lowest quarter of steps, a median of 3,553 a day [1]; people in the reference quarter, a median of 3,867 steps a day [2]; 2,000 steps a day [3][4]; taking 4,000 steps a day [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against the lowest quarter, the hazard of death was 0.60 at a median of 5,801 steps, 0.55 at 7,842 and 0.47 at 10,901 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.57). Risk fell until 6,000 to 8,000 steps a day in adults aged 60 and older, and until 8,000 to 10,000 in younger adults [1]. Each extra 1,000 steps was linked to 15% lower mortality (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.91) [2]. Risk was significantly lower from 2,517 steps a day (HR 0.92), with the largest drop at about 8,763 steps (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.43) [3]. Against 2,000 steps, 7,000 was linked to 47% lower mortality (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.60), with an inflection at about 5,000 to 7,000 [4]. In US adults, 8,000 steps (HR 0.49) and 12,000 steps (HR 0.35) were linked to lower mortality than 4,000 [5].
- Population
- 47,471 adults in 15 cohorts with 3,013 deaths, median follow-up 7.1 years [1]. 226,889 participants in 17 cohorts [2]. 111,309 people in 12 studies [3]. 14 studies in the mortality analysis, from 57 studies of 35 cohorts [4]. 4,840 US adults aged 40 and older, followed a mean of 10.1 years [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Observational, with steps measured by a device for about a week. Confounding by health and income is possible, and reverse causation is likely in part: illness and frailty lower step counts before death. Results depended on where the device was worn [3]. After adjusting for total steps, faster stepping was not linked to lower mortality in one cohort (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.27) [5], while peak 30-minute cadence kept a link in another analysis (HR 0.67) [1].
Death from any cause and from cardiovascular disease
Linked to more deaths at lower eGFR: against 95, risk was 18% higher at 60, 57% higher at 45 and about 3 times higher at 15.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a collaborative meta-analysis of general population cohorts, risk of death was unrelated to eGFR between 75 and 105 mL/min/1.73 m2 and rose at lower values. Against an eGFR of 95, adjusted hazard ratios for death from any cause were 1.18 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.32) at 60, 1.57 (1.39 to 1.78) at 45 and 3.14 (2.39 to 4.13) at 15, with similar findings for cardiovascular death [6]. In a later individual-participant analysis of 114 cohorts, lower eGFR was significantly associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, including in the mildest categories of chronic kidney disease [7].
- Population
- 105,872 participants in 14 studies with urine albumin-to-creatinine measurements and 1,128,310 in 7 studies with dipstick measurements [6]. 27,503,140 individuals in 114 cohorts, mean age 54, mean follow-up 4.8 years [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Observational. Urine albumin predicted death independently of eGFR, so eGFR alone gives part of the picture [6]. KDIGO notes that creatinine-based eGFR has a J-shaped association with most outcomes, with risk also rising above 105 mL/min/1.73 m2, and that very low creatinine often reflects frailty or low muscle mass [3].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths above 100 mg/dL and not between 70 and 100 mg/dL, in 97 pooled cohorts of 820,900 people.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 97 prospective studies, fasting glucose above 100 mg/dL was associated with death and levels of 70 to 100 mg/dL were not. Diabetes went with a hazard ratio for death from any cause of 1.80 (95% CI 1.71 to 1.90) [10]. In an updated meta-analysis, prediabetes by any definition went with a relative risk of death from any cause of 1.13 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.17) in the general population [11]. An earlier meta-analysis put the relative risk at 1.13 for impaired fasting glucose by both the American and WHO definitions [9].
- Population
- 820,900 people in 97 prospective studies, with 123,205 deaths [10]. 10,069,955 people in 129 studies, median follow-up 9.8 years [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [9]
- Caveats
- Observational. The updated meta-analysis pooled several definitions of prediabetes, and found impaired glucose tolerance carried a higher risk than impaired fasting glucose [11].
Death from any cause
Linked to 6% lower death from any cause at the highest fish intake than the lowest, and 12% lower at 60 g a day than none, in pooled cohorts.
Compared with the lowest category of fish intake, or people who never ate fish [4]; 20 g a day less fish, in a dose-response model [5]; the lowest fatty fish intake [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 12 cohorts, the highest category of fish intake was linked to lower death from any cause than the lowest (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.98), and 60 g of fish a day to 12% lower death than never eating fish (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.93) [4]. In a second review, each extra 20 g a day was marginally linked to lower death (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.00, I² 81.9%). The link was significant only in Asian studies, and Western studies suggested a U-shaped curve with the lowest risk near 20 g a day [5]. Fatty fish was linked to lower total death (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99), and lean fish was not [6].
- Population
- 672,389 participants and 57,641 deaths in 12 cohorts [4]. 911,348 participants and 75,451 deaths in 14 cohorts [5]. 104,763 deaths in the cohorts of fatty fish [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Observational. People who eat more fish may differ in income, diet and other habits (confounding), and people who fall ill may change what they eat, which can run the link backward (reverse causation). The regional differences may reflect the type of fish and how it is cooked [5].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths from any cause, about 7% higher risk for each 5 U/L in a meta-analysis of general population cohorts.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 19 cohort studies, the relative risk of death from any cause was 1.60 (95% CI 1.42 to 1.80) comparing the top and bottom thirds of baseline GGT, and 1.07 (1.04 to 1.10) per 5 U/L higher, consistent with a linear relationship [7]. A second meta-analysis of 35 prospective studies found GGT was associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality even at levels inside the reference interval [8]. In 14,950 US adults without viral hepatitis followed for 12 years, GGT above 51 U/L in men or 33 U/L in women went with more deaths from any cause (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.8), from liver disease (HR 13.0, 95% CI 2.4 to 71.5), from neoplasms (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.2) and from diabetes (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 7.6) [4].
- Population
- Over 9.24 million participants and 242,953 deaths in 19 cohorts, which also covered other liver enzymes [7]. 571,511 participants and 72,196 deaths in 35 studies [8]. 14,950 adults in the third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [4].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational. Many of the pooled studies did not exclude people with liver disease or heavy alcohol use, which the authors of one meta-analysis say may have obscured the results [8]. Liver disease deaths were 0.13% of the US cohort, so the interval around that estimate is wide [4].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at higher levels, about 75% more in the highest than the lowest category across pooled general population studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of prospective studies in the general population, the highest category of hs-CRP had a pooled risk ratio of 1.75 for death from any cause against the lowest (95% CI 1.55 to 1.98), 2.03 for cardiovascular death (1.65 to 2.50) and 1.25 for cancer death (1.13 to 1.38) [10]. In pooled individual records, the risk ratio per threefold higher CRP after adjustment for conventional risk factors was 1.55 for vascular death (95% CI 1.37 to 1.76) and 1.54 for non-vascular death (1.40 to 1.68) [6].
- Population
- 83,995 participants in 14 studies [10]. 160,309 people in 54 studies [6].
- Sources
- [10], [6]
- Caveats
- Observational. CRP rises with many illnesses, so a higher level may mark disease already present. The link with cancer death was seen in men and not in women [10].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at both low and high levels in two pooled analyses, 27% to 33% more at low levels and 18% to 23% more at high levels.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 12 studies, people with low IGF-1 had a hazard ratio for death from any cause of 1.27 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.49) and people with high IGF-1 had 1.18 (1.04 to 1.34), each against the middle of the distribution. The relation was U-shaped, and it held for both cancer deaths and cardiovascular deaths. The predicted hazard ratio was 1.56 (1.31 to 1.86) for the 10th percentile against the 50th, and 1.29 (1.06 to 1.58) for the 90th against the 50th [4]. A later meta-analysis of 19 cohorts found 1.33 (1.14 to 1.57) for low against middle levels and 1.23 (1.06 to 1.44) for high against middle, with the lowest mortality at 120 to 160 ng/mL [5].
- Population
- 14,906 participants in 12 studies [4]. 30,876 adults in 19 prospective cohorts [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Observational. The cohorts used different assays, and results from different assays differ, most of all at the upper end [2], so the 120 to 160 ng/mL figure is not tied to any one laboratory's result. The later analysis notes that low IGF-1 may reflect frailty and illness already present [5].
125 more
Fatigue
Shown to reduce fatigue in iron-deficient adults without anemia. In one trial, only women with ferritin at or below 50 µg/L improved.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In iron-deficient adults without anemia, iron reduced self-reported fatigue (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.23, I² 0%, 4 trials, 714 participants) [3]. In 144 non-anemic women with unexplained fatigue, 80 mg a day of elemental iron for 4 weeks lowered fatigue by 29% versus 13% on placebo (difference 0.95 points on a 10-point scale, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.62). Only women with ferritin at or below 50 µg/L improved [4]. A 2025 meta-analysis of non-anemic participants found less fatigue in RCTs (d 0.34), and no effect when participants without iron deficiency were analyzed alone [5].
- Population
- Iron-deficient non-anemic adults [3]; Swiss women aged 18 to 55 in primary care [4]; 1,408 participants in 18 studies, 1,176 of them menstruating adults and 204 aged 5 to 17 [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Fatigue is self-reported. Reference [4] is one of the trials pooled in [3], and the two reviews may share other trials [3][5]. The 2025 abstract does not give confidence intervals [5].
Body weight, in place of sugar
Shown to lower body weight by about 1 kg when sweetened foods or drinks replaced sugar-sweetened ones, in pooled trials of adults.
Compared with sugar-sweetened drinks [5]; sugar-sweetened foods or drinks [6]; the regular-calorie versions of the same foods and drinks [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Replacing sugar-sweetened drinks with low- and no-calorie sweetened drinks lowered body weight by 1.06 kg (95% CI -1.71 to -0.41), BMI by 0.32 and body fat by 0.60 percentage points, with moderate certainty [5]. In sustained trials of 4 weeks to 40 months, sweeteners against sugar lowered body weight by 1.35 kg (95% CI -2.28 to -0.42), and before a meal cut total energy intake by 94 kcal [6]. Across 15 trials, low-calorie sweeteners lowered weight by 0.80 kg (95% CI -1.17 to -0.43), fat mass by 1.10 kg and waist by 0.83 cm [7]. In children, sweeteners against sugar gave a smaller rise in BMI z score (-0.15, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.12) and no significant difference in weight [8].
- Population
- 601 adults with overweight or obesity, at risk for or with diabetes, in 12 trials [5]. 9 sustained trial comparisons [6]. 15 trials [7]. 528 children in 2 studies [8].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The weight differences are small. WHO's 2023 review, the basis of its guideline, found no long-term benefit in reducing body fat [1].
Death from any cause
Linked to 11% lower death per extra 25 g of olive oil a day, and 19% lower at over 7 g a day than never, in cohorts.
Compared with 25 g a day less, in a dose-response model [3]; the bottom third of intake [4]; people who never or rarely used olive oil [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pooled cohorts found a relative risk of 0.89 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.93) per extra 25 g a day [3]. The top against the bottom third of intake of monounsaturated fat sources gave 0.89 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96), and in subgroups only olive oil, not monounsaturated fat in general, was linked to lower death [4]. In US nurses and health professionals followed 28 years, more than 7 g a day was linked to lower death than never or rarely using it (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.84), and to lower death from heart disease, cancer, neurodegenerative and respiratory disease. Olive oil did not differ from other vegetable oils combined [5].
- Population
- 733,420 participants and 174,081 deaths [3]. 841,211 participants in 32 cohorts [4]. 60,582 women and 31,801 men free of heart disease and cancer at the start [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Observational. Olive oil users may differ in diet, income and other habits. Heterogeneity was present for death [3]. Replacing butter, margarine, mayonnaise or dairy fat with olive oil was linked to lower death, but replacing other vegetable oils was not [5].
Chronic pain not caused by cancer
Shown to lower chronic non-cancer pain by about 0.7 points on a 10-point scale against placebo, with no advantage found over non-opioid drugs.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 96 trials, opioids lowered pain against placebo by 0.69 cm on a 10 cm scale (95% CI 0.56 to 0.82) and improved physical function by 2.04 points on a 100-point scale (95% CI 1.41 to 2.68). The modeled share reaching a minimally important pain difference was 11.9 percentage points higher. Pain relief was similar to that with NSAIDs (difference -0.60 cm, 95% CI -1.54 to 0.34) and tricyclic antidepressants (-0.13 cm, 95% CI -0.99 to 0.74) [6]. A federal evidence review of 115 trials also found small short-term benefits against placebo in pain, function and sleep, smaller at 3 to 6 months than at 1 to 3 months, and no difference from non-opioid drugs. It found no trial that evaluated intermediate or long-term benefits against placebo [7]. Over 12 months in veterans with chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain, pain-related function did not differ between opioid and non-opioid treatment (3.4 against 3.3), and pain intensity was lower in the non-opioid group (4.0 against 3.5) [8].
- Population
- 26,169 participants in 96 trials, median age 58 [6]; 115 randomized trials and 40 observational studies [7]; 240 veterans randomized to opioid or non-opioid treatment strategies [8].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Most placebo-controlled trials were short. The 12-month trial was pragmatic, with only the outcome assessment masked [8].
Death from any cause
Linked to about 30% fewer deaths at the guideline amount of 150 minutes a week in pooled cohorts, with the curve flattening at 3 to 5 times that amount.
Compared with people reporting no leisure-time physical activity [1]; people doing no non-occupational activity, the reference of its dose-response curves [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against no leisure activity, mortality was 20% lower below the guideline minimum of 7.5 MET-hours a week (HR 0.80), 31% lower at 1 to 2 times the minimum (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.70) and 37% lower at 2 to 3 times. The benefit leveled off at 3 to 5 times the minimum (HR 0.61). There was no sign of harm at 10 times or more (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.78) [1]. At 8.75 mMET-hours a week, equal to 150 minutes of moderate activity, the RR was 0.69 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.73). Differences were largest between none and that amount, smaller up to double it, and small and uncertain beyond. If all insufficiently active people reached that amount, 15.7% of premature deaths would have been averted [2].
- Population
- 661,137 adults, median age 62, with 116,686 deaths in 6 US and European cohorts, median follow-up 14.2 years [1]. Over 30 million participants in 94 cohorts, with 811,616 deaths in the mortality analysis [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Observational, with self-reported activity. Illness lowers activity before death, which is reverse causation, and active people differ in diet, smoking and income. The averted-deaths figure assumes the link is causal [2].
Cancer
Linked to lower risk of 13 of 26 cancer types and about 15% fewer cancer deaths in pooled cohorts, with slightly more melanoma and prostate cancer.
Compared with people at the 10th percentile of leisure-time activity [18]; people doing no non-occupational activity [2]; insufficiently active people [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- High against low leisure activity was linked to lower risk of 13 cancers, including lung (HR 0.74), colon (HR 0.84), endometrial (HR 0.79) and breast (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.93). It was linked to more melanoma (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.40) and prostate cancer (HR 1.05) [18]. Cancer death had an RR of 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.89) at 150 minutes a week of moderate activity [2]. The most active people had 14% less breast cancer and 21% less colon cancer [4].
- Population
- 1.44 million adults, median age 59, with 186,932 cancers in 12 cohorts [18]. 35,500,867 person-years with 185,870 cancers [2]. 35 studies of breast and 19 of colon cancer [4].
- Sources
- [18], [2], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational. Adjusting for body mass index weakened several links, though 10 of 13 stayed significant [18]. The abstracts do not report whether sun exposure or cancer screening differed between groups.
Cancer in kidney transplant recipients
Shown to lower cancer and skin cancer in kidney transplant recipients against other regimens, with new skin squamous cell cancers about halved.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against regimens without it, sirolimus was associated with a lower risk of cancer (adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93) and of non-melanoma skin cancer (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.63). The reduction was largest in people switched to sirolimus from an established regimen [6]. In recipients who had already had a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, switching from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus lowered 2-year incidence of a new one (IRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.67), with certainty rated high [7].
- Population
- Individual data from 5,876 kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant recipients in 21 RCTs [6]; 4 RCTs with 393 kidney transplant recipients with prior skin squamous cell carcinoma [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- The same analysis found higher mortality on sirolimus (see Risks) [6]. Stopping for adverse events was more common on sirolimus in [7]. It describes transplant recipients on combined immunosuppression, not healthy adults.
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths with more sitting in pooled cohorts, independent of exercise, with risk rising mainly above about 7 to 8 hours a day.
Compared with people with less sedentary time, with physical activity held equal [1]; each hour less of sitting, within intervals of 0 to 3, over 3 to 7 and over 7 hours a day [2]; each hour less of sitting a day [3]; the least sedentary quarter of people [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Sedentary time was linked to higher all-cause mortality after adjusting for physical activity (HR 1.240, 95% CI 1.090 to 1.410), more so at low activity [1]. Each extra hour of sitting carried an HR of 1.00 between 0 and 3 hours, 1.02 between 3 and 7 hours and 1.05 above 7 hours, an estimated 34% higher risk at 10 hours a day [2]. Each hour added 1% to risk up to 8 hours a day and 4% above 8 hours [3]. With sitting measured by device, the most sedentary quarter had an HR of 2.63 (95% CI 1.94 to 3.56) against the least sedentary [4].
- Population
- 13 studies in the mortality analysis, from 47 articles [1]. 595,086 adults with 29,162 deaths in 6 cohorts [2]. 1,331,468 participants in 34 studies [3]. 36,383 adults, mean age 62.6, in 8 cohorts with device-measured sitting [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational, and sitting was self-reported in all but one study in one review [1]. Confounding is likely, and reverse causation is possible because people who are ill sit more. The device-measured cohorts were mostly older women, and the size of their link is larger than in the self-report cohorts [4].
Whether exercise offsets sitting
Linked to no higher death rate from sitting in people doing about 60 to 75 minutes of moderate activity a day, in a harmonized analysis of over a million adults.
Compared with people sitting under 4 hours a day in the most active quarter [5]; people with less sedentary time, with physical activity held equal [1]; each hour less of sitting, with and without adjustment for activity [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- People sitting over 8 hours a day but in the most active quarter (over 35.5 MET-hours a week) had no higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.10) than those sitting under 4 hours in the same quarter. People sitting under 4 hours in the least active quarter had higher mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.31). The highest risk was in the least active people sitting over 8 hours (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.66) [5]. Sitting-linked risk was more pronounced at lower activity levels [1], and moderate to vigorous activity weakened the sitting link [2].
- Population
- 1,005,791 adults in 13 cohorts with 84,609 deaths, followed 2 to 18.1 years [5]. 47 articles [1]. 595,086 adults [2].
- Sources
- [5], [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Observational, with self-reported sitting and activity. The active quarter's level, about 60 to 75 minutes of moderate activity a day, is well above what most adults do [5].
TV time and death
Linked to more deaths with more TV time in pooled cohorts, rising above about 3 to 4 hours a day, a link exercise weakened but did not remove.
Compared with each 2 hours less of TV a day [6]; each hour less of TV a day [3]; people in the lowest of four TV-time groups and the most active quarter [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Each 2 hours of TV a day was linked to 13% higher mortality (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.18), with risk rising above 3 hours a day [6]. After adjusting for activity, each hour of TV added 3% to risk up to 3.5 hours a day and 6% above that [3]. Watching 3 hours or more was linked to higher mortality at every activity level except the most active, where only 5 hours or more carried a higher risk (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.28) [5].
- Population
- 26,509 people with 1,879 deaths in 3 cohorts [6]. 34 studies [3]. 465,450 people with 43,740 deaths in 6 cohorts [5].
- Sources
- [6], [3], [5]
- Caveats
- Observational. TV time often goes with snacking, lower income and poorer health, which may explain part of the link.
Death from any cause
Linked to the lowest death rates at about 7 hours a night in pooled cohorts, a J or U shape, with a steeper rise for long sleep than for short.
Compared with people sleeping 7 to 8 hours a night, the reference in most studies [1]; people sleeping 7 hours a day [2]; normal sleepers [3]; people with normal sleep duration [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A dose-response meta-analysis found a U-shaped curve with the lowest risk at about 7 hours a day. Below 7 hours, risk rose 6% per hour less (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.07). Above 7 hours, it rose 13% per hour more (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.15). The shortest and longest groups had RRs of 1.13 and 1.35 [1]. A spline analysis of 40 cohorts found a J shape: against 7 hours, RR was 1.06 at 5 hours, 1.04 at 6 hours, 1.03 at 8 hours, 1.13 at 9 hours, 1.25 at 10 hours and 1.38 at 11 hours [2]. Short sleepers had a 12% higher risk (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.16), with a linear rise below 6 hours [3]. Long sleepers had a 39% higher risk (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.47) [4].
- Population
- 3,582,016 participants in 67 articles, follow-up 2.3 to 34 years [1]. 2,200,425 participants with 271,507 deaths in 40 cohorts [2]. 5,172,710 participants in 153 studies [3]. 5,134,036 participants in 137 cohorts [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational. Sleep was self-reported by questionnaire in most cohorts. Confounding is likely, and reverse causation is a strong candidate for long sleep: illness, depression and low fitness lengthen sleep, and some illnesses shorten it. The authors of the long sleep review call for work on whether the link is causal [4]. Heterogeneity was high for long sleep (I² 76.2%) [1]. In one review, short sleep was linked to higher risk in women and not in men [2].
Death from any cause after quitting
Linked to fewer deaths after quitting at every age in large cohorts, with about 90% of the excess avoided by quitting before 40. A quit-program trial lowered deaths.
Compared with people who continued to smoke [1][2]; never-smokers, with ex-smokers' excess set against continuing smokers' excess [3]; people who continued to smoke, and never smokers [4]; never smokers, by years since quitting [5]; usual care, in a randomized trial of a quit program [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Adults who quit at ages 25 to 34, 35 to 44 or 45 to 54 gained about 10, 9 and 6 years of life against those who continued to smoke. Quitting before 40 lowered the death risk of continued smoking by about 90% [1]. In British doctors, stopping at 60, 50, 40 or 30 gained about 3, 6, 9 or 10 years [2]. Women who stopped at 25 to 34 or 35 to 44 had death rates 1.05 and 1.20 times those of never-smokers, 3% and 10% of the excess in continuing smokers [3]. Across four national cohorts, former smokers had a hazard ratio of 1.3 against never smokers. Quitting for under 3 years was linked to 90% to 95% less excess risk in people under 40, and quitting for 10 years or more to survival similar to never smokers [4]. In people 60 and older, former smokers' excess mortality (RM 1.34, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.40) fell with years since quitting, and gains were seen in people 80 and older [5]. In a randomized trial, a quit program raised 5-year quitting to 21.7% against 5.4% with usual care. Deaths were 8.83 against 10.38 per 1,000 person-years (HR for usual care 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.37) [6].
- Population
- 202,248 US adults with 15,715 deaths [1]. 34,439 male British doctors followed 50 years [2]. 1.2 million UK women followed about 12 years [3]. 1.48 million adults in the US, UK, Norway and Canada with 122,697 deaths over 15 years [4]. 17 cohorts of people 60 and older in 7 countries [5]. 5,887 middle-aged smokers with mild airway obstruction, followed 14.5 years [6].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- The cohorts are observational, and people who quit may differ in other ways from those who do not. Some people quit because they are already ill, which hides part of the gain in the first years. The trial's effect comes from a program that only a minority of its group used to quit, and it enrolled only people with airway obstruction [6].
Diabetic nerve pain
Shown to cut pain by half or more in painful diabetic neuropathy on duloxetine 60 mg, with about 5 treated for one extra person helped.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The evidence is for duloxetine. At 60 mg a day, a 50% or greater drop in pain at 12 weeks was more likely than on placebo (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.08), a number needed to treat of 5 (95% CI 4 to 7). Doses of 60 and 120 mg both reduced pain, and lower doses did not. 16% of participants stopped the drug for adverse effects [13]. Across neuropathic pain conditions, the combined number needed to treat for SNRIs was 6.4 (95% CI 5.2 to 8.4), with duloxetine making up 9 of 14 studies [14]. In a network meta-analysis of chronic pain, duloxetine was the highest-ranked antidepressant, and 60 mg did as well as higher doses on most outcomes [15].
- Population
- 2,728 participants with painful diabetic neuropathy in 8 studies [13]; 229 studies of drugs for neuropathic pain in adults [14]; 28,664 adults with chronic pain in 176 studies averaging 10 weeks [15].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- Almost every duloxetine study was run or sponsored by the manufacturer [13]. An analysis of publication bias suggested treatment effects in neuropathic pain were overstated by about 10% [14]. Most studies measured short-term outcomes only [15].
Fibromyalgia
Shown to raise the share with 50% pain relief in fibromyalgia from about 21% to 31%, a gain Cochrane reviewers judged not clinically relevant.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- On duloxetine or milnacipran, 31% reported pain relief of 50% or greater against 21% on placebo (risk difference 0.09, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.11), a number needed to treat of 11. More people rated themselves much or very much improved (52% vs 29%, number needed to treat 5). Fatigue changed little (SMD -0.13) [16]. For duloxetine 60 mg alone, the risk ratio for 50% pain relief was 1.57 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.06) at 12 weeks, a number needed to treat of 8 [13]. Across chronic pain conditions, with fibromyalgia the most studied, duloxetine 60 mg raised the odds of substantial pain relief (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.17) [15].
- Population
- 7,903 participants in 18 studies, 7 of duloxetine, 9 of milnacipran and 1 of desvenlafaxine [16]; 2,249 participants with fibromyalgia in 6 studies [13]; 4,490 participants in 16 studies for the pain relief outcome [15].
- Sources
- [16], [13], [15]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality was rated low for all comparisons with placebo, over concerns about publication bias [16]. The pooled figures mix duloxetine with milnacipran, which is outside this page. The band above uses the 9 to 10 point gain in responders.
Death from any cause
Linked to higher death rates with social isolation and loneliness in three meta-analyses, about 14% to 32% higher, and 50% higher odds of survival with stronger relationships.
Compared with people with weaker social relationships [1]; people who were not socially isolated, lonely or living alone [2]; people who were not socially isolated or lonely [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- People with stronger social relationships had 50% higher odds of survival (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.59), consistent across age, sex, initial health, cause of death and follow-up. The link was strongest for complex measures of social integration (OR 1.91) and weakest for living alone versus with others (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.44) [1]. In studies adjusting for confounders, social isolation (OR 1.29), loneliness (OR 1.26) and living alone (OR 1.32) were each linked to higher mortality, with no difference between objective and felt isolation [2]. In 90 cohorts, social isolation (1.32, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.39) and loneliness (1.14, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.20) were linked to all-cause mortality, and both to cancer mortality [3].
- Population
- 308,849 participants in 148 studies [1]. Studies from 1980 to 2014 [2]. 2,205,199 adults in 90 prospective cohorts [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Observational. Illness can cause isolation and loneliness, which is reverse causation, and initial health status changed the results in one review [2]. Social ties also shape smoking, activity and use of medical care, which may carry part of the link. The links were stronger in samples younger than 65 [2].
Death from any cause
Linked to 15% to 21% fewer deaths with muscle-strengthening activity in pooled cohorts, a J shape with the lowest risk at about 30 to 60 minutes a week.
Compared with people doing no muscle-strengthening activity [1]; no exercise [2]; no resistance training [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Muscle-strengthening activity was linked to 15% lower mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.93). The dose-response curve was J-shaped, lowest at 40 minutes a week (RR 0.83), with estimates below 1 up to about 140 minutes a week. Combined with aerobic activity, risk was lower still [1]. A second review found 21% lower mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.91), and 40% lower when combined with aerobic exercise (HR 0.60) [2]. A third found 15% lower mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.93), with the largest drop, 27%, at about 60 minutes a week, and smaller drops at higher volumes [3].
- Population
- 263,058 adults with 42,133 deaths in 7 cohorts, 236,331 in the dose-response analysis [1]. 370,256 participants in 10 cohorts and 1 trial, mean follow-up 8.85 years [2]. 10 studies of nonclinical adults, 4 in the dose-response analysis [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Observational, with self-reported activity. Certainty was rated very low and heterogeneity was high (I² 83%) [1]. Few studies informed the dose-response curves, so the shape above 60 minutes a week is uncertain [1][3].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at low TSH, with no rise in deaths at mildly raised TSH, across three pooled analyses of cohorts.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- People with TSH below 0.45 mIU/L and normal free T4 had a hazard ratio for death from any cause of 1.24 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.46) against people with TSH of 0.45 to 4.49 mIU/L [17]. Total mortality was not increased in people with TSH of 4.5 to 19.9 mIU/L and normal thyroxine [16]. In 134,346 adults, the lowest risk of cardiovascular disease and death fell at the 60th to 80th percentiles of TSH, medians of 1.90 to 2.90 mIU/L. Against that band, the lowest fifth of TSH had a hazard ratio for death from any cause of 1.09 (1.05 to 1.14) [18].
- Population
- 52,674 adults in 10 cohorts, 8,527 deaths [17]. 55,287 adults in 11 cohorts, 9,664 deaths [16]. 134,346 adults in 26 cohorts, median age 59 [18].
- Sources
- [17], [16], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational. A US guideline notes that acute illness can suppress TSH [3], so reverse causation cannot be ruled out. The percentile figures are adjusted for age and sex [18].
Death and living near green space
Linked to fewer deaths in people living amid more greenery, in two meta-analyses, about 4% fewer per step of greenness within 500 meters of home.
Compared with people with lower greenspace exposure [2]; people with 0.1 lower NDVI greenness within 500 meters of home [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Greenspace exposure was linked to lower all-cause mortality (0.69, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.87) and cardiovascular mortality (0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93) [2]. Each 0.1 rise in satellite-measured greenness within 500 meters of home was linked to 4% lower mortality (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.97, I² 95%) [12].
- Population
- 143 studies [2]. 8,324,652 people in 9 cohorts from 7 countries [12].
- Sources
- [2], [12]
- Caveats
- Observational, and about where people live, not time they spend in nature. Income, air pollution and activity differ between greener and less green areas. Heterogeneity was very high [12], and the broader review notes poor study quality [2].
Death from any cause in men
Linked to more deaths in men at low testosterone: below 213 ng/dL for death from any cause and below 153 ng/dL for cardiovascular death in pooled cohorts.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In pooled individual data from cohorts that measured testosterone by mass spectrometry, men with baseline total testosterone below 7.4 nmol/L (213 ng/dL) had higher mortality from any cause, and men below 5.3 nmol/L (153 ng/dL) had higher cardiovascular mortality [16]. An earlier meta-analysis of 11 studies of death from any cause and 7 of cardiovascular death found low testosterone associated with both, with considerable differences between studies that tracked the men's age and testosterone levels, the length of follow-up and the time of day of sampling [17].
- Population
- 9 cohorts with individual data covering 255,830 participant-years, plus 11 studies with summary estimates [16]. 16,184 men for death from any cause and 11,831 for cardiovascular death, mean age 61, mean follow-up 9.7 years [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Observational. The earlier analysis concluded that the differences between studies suggest effects driven by the underlying health of the cohorts, so low testosterone may mark illness [17].
Death from any cause in older volunteers
Linked to about 22% to 24% fewer deaths in older adults who volunteered, in three meta-analyses of cohorts after adjusting for health.
Compared with older adults who did not volunteer [1]; non-volunteers [2]; non-volunteers in studies with a well-defined control group [3]; people who volunteered 0 hours a year [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After adjustment for health and other factors, volunteering was linked to 24% lower mortality (95% CI 16% to 31%), and to 47% lower without adjustment [1]. Volunteers had lower mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.90) [2]. In people 65 and older, volunteers had lower mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80) with no heterogeneity between studies [3]. Volunteering 100 hours or more a year was linked to lower mortality over 4 years [4].
- Population
- Adults aged 55 and older in organizational volunteering studies [1]. 5 cohort studies [2]. Adults 65 and older in 10 mortality studies, average follow-up 5 years [3]. 12,998 US adults over 50 [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational. People in better health, with more money and more social ties, are more able to volunteer, which is confounding and reverse causation. Adjustment cut the link by about half [1].
Purpose in life and death from any cause
Linked to about 17% to 24% fewer deaths in people with a stronger sense of purpose in life, in two meta-analyses of cohorts.
Compared with people with a lower sense of purpose in life [10][11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Higher purpose in life was linked to lower mortality (adjusted RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.91) [10]. Across 25 samples, purpose was linked to lower mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.83), 0.85 after adjusting for behavior and clinical risk factors, and 0.91 after adjusting for depression [11].
- Population
- 136,265 participants in 10 prospective studies [10]. 488,765 participants with 48,928 deaths, followed up to 32 years [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational, with purpose measured by questionnaire. Adjustment for health habits and depression shrank the link, so part of it runs through them [11]. Illness can lower a sense of purpose, which is reverse causation.
Death from any cause
Linked to 16% to 17% lower death from any cause at the highest whole grain intake or per three daily servings, in pooled cohorts.
Compared with 90 g a day less whole grain, in a dose-response model [3]; the lowest whole grain intake [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Per extra 90 g a day, the relative risk was 0.83 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.90, I² 83%) for death from any cause, 0.85 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.91) for cancer death and 0.78 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.87) for respiratory death. Lower risks were seen up to 210 to 225 g a day [3]. The highest against the lowest intake was linked to lower total death (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.88) and cancer death (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.94), and each extra 16 g a day to 7% lower total death (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.94) [4].
- Population
- 45 prospective studies [3]. 786,076 participants and 97,867 deaths in 14 cohorts [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational, with high heterogeneity for total death (I² 83% and 74%) [3][4]. Confounding and reverse causation as above.
Daily steps and physical activity
Shown to raise physical activity by about 1,800 steps a day across 39 systematic reviews of activity trackers in healthy and clinical groups.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- An umbrella review of 39 systematic reviews and meta-analyses found activity trackers improved physical activity (SMD 0.3 to 0.6), equal to about 1,800 extra steps a day and 40 minutes a day more walking, and improved fitness (SMD 0.3) [18].
- Population
- 163,992 participants of all age groups, from healthy and clinical populations [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- The reviews cover wearable activity trackers as a class. They do not test whether heart rate or calorie readings themselves changed behavior [18].
Body weight
Shown to lower body weight by about 1 kg across systematic reviews of activity tracker trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The same umbrella review found improvements in body composition (SMD 0.7 to 2.0), equal to reductions of about 1 kg in body weight [18].
- Population
- Participants in 39 systematic reviews and meta-analyses [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- The reviews cover wearable activity trackers as a class and do not isolate wrist heart rate or calorie readings [18].
Acute pain after surgery
Shown to give at least half pain relief to about half of adults after surgery with one dose, against about 20% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 51 trials, about half of participants given a single standard dose had at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, against about 20% on placebo. The number needed to treat was 3.5 (95% CI 2.7 to 4.8) at 500 mg, 4.6 (3.9 to 5.5) at 600 to 650 mg and 3.6 (3.4 to 4.0) at 975 to 1,000 mg, with no dose response. About half needed more pain medication within 4 to 6 hours, against about 70% on placebo [1]. An overview of Cochrane reviews of over-the-counter pain relievers found paracetamol and aspirin had numbers needed to treat of 3 or above and success rates of 11% to 43%, and ibuprofen plus paracetamol combinations had numbers needed to treat below 2 [2].
- Population
- 5,762 adults in 51 single-dose trials, 3,277 given paracetamol and 2,425 placebo [1]; 10 Cochrane reviews covering 21 drugs, doses and formulations, mostly tested after third molar extraction [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Single doses followed for 4 to 6 hours. The overview draws on the same Cochrane review, so the two are not independent. Adverse event reporting in the trials was inconsistent and often incomplete [1].
Taken with ibuprofen for acute pain
Shown to give at least half pain relief to about 7 in 10 adults after surgery when taken with ibuprofen, against 7% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- At least 50% of maximum pain relief over 6 hours was reached by 69% on ibuprofen 200 mg plus paracetamol 500 mg, 73% on ibuprofen 400 mg plus paracetamol 1,000 mg and 7% on placebo, giving numbers needed to treat of 1.6 and 1.5. On ibuprofen 400 mg alone the share was 52%. Median time to rescue medication was 7.6 and 8.3 hours on the combinations and 1.7 hours on placebo. One or more adverse events were reported by 30% and 29% on the combinations and 48% on placebo [3].
- Population
- 1,647 participants in 3 single-dose trials [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Three trials of one dose each. No serious adverse events were reported [3].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at lower albumin, with the odds of death 24% to 56% higher for each 0.25 g/dL lower in a review of cohort studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A review of cohort studies in people with and without illness found that albumin was inversely related to the risk of death in a graded manner over its entire range. The estimated increase in the odds of death was 24% to 56% for each 2.5 g/L (0.25 g/dL) lower albumin, and the association covered cardiovascular death as well as death overall [7]. In a meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of acutely ill patients, each 10 g/L (1 g/dL) decline in albumin raised the odds of death by 137% and of complications by 89%, and the association appeared independent of nutritional status and inflammation [8].
- Population
- Cohort studies of many populations, from people with no known illness to patients with acute or chronic illness [7]. 291,433 acutely ill patients in 90 cohort studies [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Observational. The review's authors consider it likely that albumin is a highly sensitive indicator of preclinical disease and disease severity, and state that there is no direct evidence that albumin itself protects [7].
Death and cardiovascular disease
Linked to slightly more deaths and cardiovascular disease at higher calcium, 13% more deaths per standard deviation, in pooled studies of people without a calcium disorder.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a systematic review of studies in people selected neither for kidney disease nor for abnormal calcium, 5 of 11 studies reported a significant positive association between serum calcium and death, and 8 of 13 between serum calcium and cardiovascular disease. Pooled across 8 studies each, the hazard ratio per standard deviation of serum calcium was 1.13 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.18) for death and 1.08 (1.04 to 1.13) for cardiovascular disease. With hazard ratios adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, the pooled figure for cardiovascular disease was 1.04 (1.01 to 1.08) [5].
- Population
- Longitudinal studies with at least 1 year of follow-up, located in a search to December 2014 [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- Observational. The authors state that these data cannot determine causality [5]. The abstract gives no total head count.
Infant colic, all trials
Shown to cut infant crying by about 1 hour 12 minutes a day in pooled trials, many of them with parents who knew which treatment their baby had.
Compared with no treatment, and control conditions the source abstract does not otherwise describe [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 5 trials, manipulative therapies reduced daily crying by 1.20 hours (95% CI -1.89 to -0.51). Parents reporting full recovery did not differ significantly (OR 11.12, 95% CI 0.46 to 267.52, 3 trials) [11].
- Population
- 325 infants with colic in 6 trials [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Crying was mostly recorded by parents, and only 2 of 6 trials were at low risk of performance bias. The review covers manipulative therapies given by chiropractors and osteopaths [11].
Opioid withdrawal
Shown to make severe opioid withdrawal less likely and completing withdrawal more likely than placebo, with results similar to a methadone taper but more low blood pressure.
Compared with placebo and reducing doses of methadone [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against placebo, alpha-2 agonists lowered the chance of severe withdrawal (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.57) and raised treatment completion (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.84). Against a methadone taper, withdrawal severity and completion did not differ significantly, symptoms resolved sooner, and hypotensive or other adverse effects were more likely (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.10) [9].
- Population
- 1,728 people withdrawing from heroin or methadone in 26 trials, 148 in the placebo comparisons [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- The review pooled clonidine with lofexidine, and the placebo comparisons were small [9].
Death from any cause at higher levels
Linked to more deaths from any cause at higher serum copper, about 22% more per 20 µg/dL across pooled cohort studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of cohort studies, elevated circulating copper went with more deaths from any cause (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.79), and each 20 µg/dL higher copper had a hazard ratio of 1.22 (1.04 to 1.44). The authors rated the certainty of this evidence as moderate [7]. In US adults from the 2011 to 2016 national survey, those in the top third of serum copper (19.84 µmol/L or above, about 126 µg/dL) had more deaths from any cause than those in the bottom third (below 16.31 µmol/L, about 104 µg/dL), with a hazard ratio of 2.84 (1.66 to 4.87) [10].
- Population
- 47,813 people in 17 cohort studies [7]. 5,412 US adults followed for a mean of 5.85 years, with 356 deaths [10].
- Sources
- [7], [10]
- Caveats
- Observational. The US cohort had 356 deaths and wide intervals, and its authors state that causal relationships require further investigation [10]. The abstract prints the cut points for the thirds as mol/L, read here as µmol/L, and the µg/dL figures are converted with the factor on this page. Inflammation and illness raise serum copper [3], which may account for part of the link.
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at low levels in older adults, 46% more in pooled cohorts, with a J-shaped pattern in one cohort where the highest levels also carried more.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of six prospective studies of older adults, the lowest DHEA-S category against higher levels had a pooled risk ratio of 1.46 for death from any cause (95% CI 1.25 to 1.70) and 1.49 for cardiovascular death (1.11 to 1.99). The association was found in men (1.41, 1.18 to 1.69) and did not reach significance in women (1.72, 0.99 to 2.99) [3]. In a German cohort followed for a median 17.7 years, both the lowest and the highest fifths for sex and age had more deaths from any cause than the middle fifth (hazard ratios 1.51, 1.25 to 1.82, and 1.31, 1.08 to 1.58) [4]. In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort, DHEA-S below the 25th percentile for sex (70.0 µg/dL in men, 37.1 µg/dL in women) had hazard ratios for death of 1.12 in men (1.01 to 1.25) and 1.19 in women (1.03 to 1.37) [5]. In Swedish men aged 69 to 81, the lowest quarter against the rest had a hazard ratio of 1.54 (1.21 to 1.96) [6]. Among people who already had cardiovascular disease, lower DHEA-S had a pooled risk ratio for death of 1.47 (1.38 to 1.56) [7].
- Population
- 6,744 people in six prospective studies [3]. 7,370 men and women with mean ages of 55.0 and 52.4 [4]. 8,143 adults with a mean age of 63 and no cardiovascular disease at the start, followed for 18 years [5]. 2,644 men, mean follow-up 4.5 years [6]. 18 studies of patients with cardiovascular disease [7].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Observational. DHEA-S falls with age and may mark illness already present. The trials that raised DHEA-S measured other outcomes (see the trial block below).
Death from any cause in men
Linked to more deaths in men at very low estradiol, below 5.1 pmol/L or about 1.4 pg/mL, in pooled cohorts that used mass spectrometry.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In pooled individual data from cohorts of community-dwelling men, those with baseline estradiol below 5.1 pmol/L, about 1.4 pg/mL, had higher mortality from any cause. The abstract gives no hazard ratio for estradiol [11].
- Population
- 9 cohorts with individual data covering 255,830 participant-years, plus 11 studies with summary estimates [11].
- Sources
- [11], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational, with differences between studies and imputed missing data [11]. The level in question sits far below the 30 to 100 pg/mL limit of quantitation of most direct immunoassays [4].
Fatigue in adults with low ferritin and no anemia
Shown in trials: iron given to adults with low ferritin and no anemia reduced self-rated fatigue, with no change in measured physical capacity.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of randomized trials in iron-deficient adults without anemia, iron supplementation reduced self-reported fatigue (standardized mean difference -0.38, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.23, 4 trials, 714 participants). Maximal oxygen consumption did not differ (SMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.37, 9 trials, 235 participants), nor did timed exercise tests [7]. In one of the larger trials, in women with unexplained fatigue and ferritin below 50 ng/mL, the fatigue score fell 47.7% with iron and 28.8% with placebo (difference -18.9%, 95% CI -34.5 to -3.2), with no effect on quality of life, depression or anxiety [8].
- Population
- 1,170 adults in 18 trials [7]. 198 menstruating women aged 18 to 53 with hemoglobin above 12.0 g/dL, treated for 12 weeks [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Fatigue was self-rated, and the larger trial was observer-blinded with closed labels, not fully double-blind [8]. Trials defined iron deficiency by different ferritin cut points.
Cardiovascular disease and death
Linked in a J shape: risk of cardiovascular disease and death was lowest at the 20th to 40th percentiles of free T4, and the top fifth had 34% more deaths.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In pooled data on 134,346 adults, risk was lowest at the 20th to 40th percentiles of free T4, medians of 13.5 to 14.8 pmol/L. Against that band, the top fifth had hazard ratios of 1.20 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.31) for cardiovascular events or death combined, 1.34 (1.20 to 1.49) for death from any cause, 1.57 (1.31 to 1.89) for cardiovascular death and 1.22 (1.11 to 1.33) for cardiovascular events [9]. In older US adults with thyroid tests in the reference range, the top quartile of free T4 had more coronary heart disease, heart failure and deaths than the bottom quartile, by 8.0, 7.8 and 14.3 per 1,000 person-years [8].
- Population
- 134,346 adults in 26 cohorts, median age 59 [9]. 2,843 older adults [8].
- Sources
- [9], [8]
- Caveats
- Observational, so illness that shifts free T4 before an event cannot be ruled out. The pooled figures are adjusted for age and sex, and the percentile medians are printed in pmol/L [9].
Heart attack, stroke and death from any cause
Linked to more heart attacks and deaths at high levels in US and Swedish cohorts, and to slightly more deaths at the lowest levels.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a US cohort followed for two decades, elevated fructosamine and glycated albumin were each significantly associated with coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, heart failure and death after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. The associations were similar in size to those for HbA1c and tended to be J-shaped, with raised risk at the lowest levels as well [7]. In a Swedish cohort, the hazard ratio in people above 2.70 mmol/L on that cohort's scale, against its reference range, was 2.88 (95% CI 2.70 to 3.07) for heart attack and 2.31 (2.21 to 2.41) for death from any cause, and the associations weakened but remained after adjustment for glucose [8]. Among Swedish adults without diabetes, the lowest tenth of fructosamine had a hazard ratio for death of 1.20 against the middle eight tenths, falling to 1.11 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.15) after adjustment for six other blood markers [9].
- Population
- 11,104 adults with and without diabetes, with 1,096 new cases of coronary heart disease, 605 ischemic strokes, 1,432 cases of heart failure and 2,860 deaths [7]. 338,443 people followed 19 years on average, with 21,526 heart attacks and 73,458 deaths [8]. 215,011 people without diabetes, 41,388 deaths over 25 years [9].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Observational. The Swedish cohort reported fructosamine in mmol/L on a scale about ten times this page's, so its cut points are not placed here. Its authors found that smoking and chronic inflammation at least partly explained the higher mortality at low fructosamine [9]. No source here tested whether lowering fructosamine changes these outcomes, and a laboratory guideline states that treatment goals have not been established [2].
Fruit and vegetable intake in children
Shown to raise fruit and vegetable intake in children in most gardening programs, in two systematic reviews, a small effect in mostly small studies.
Compared with the same children before the program, and control groups in some studies [9]; intake before the program or in comparison schools, as each study measured it [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Ten of 14 studies found significant increases in fruit or vegetable intake after a gardening program, a small effect [9]. In elementary schools, 68% of programs raised fruit and vegetable intake and 62% raised preference, and gardening-only programs gave significant findings slightly more often (89%) than combined cooking and gardening programs (84%) [10].
- Population
- Children aged 2 to 15 in 14 studies [9]. 36 elementary school programs in 14 countries, 9 gardening-only [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Convenience samples, small sizes and self-reported intake limited the studies, and few had control groups or lasted a year [9].
Fatigue
Shown to reduce fatigue modestly in adults with fatigue, including chronic illness, across few small trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 4 RCTs pooled, ginseng reduced fatigue (SMD 0.34, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.52) [3]. A systematic review of 10 studies of Asian and American ginseng in people with fatigue found modest evidence of benefit and a low risk of adverse events [4].
- Population
- Adults with fatigue, including chronic illness [3][4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The meta-analysis authors judged the evidence insufficient because trials were few and small [3].
Death from any cause
Linked to 10% lower death in men and 18% lower in women at 5 or more cups a day than under 1 cup, in 8 pooled Japanese cohorts.
Compared with people drinking under 1 cup a day [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At 5 or more cups a day, death from any cause was lower in men (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.94) and women (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90), as was death from heart disease (HR 0.82 in men, 0.75 in women) and cerebrovascular disease (HR 0.76 in men, 0.78 in women). In women, 1 to 4 cups a day was linked to slightly lower cancer death [2].
- Population
- 313,381 Japanese adults with 52,943 deaths over a mean 17.3 years in 8 cohorts [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- Observational, with intake reported once at the start. All participants were Japanese, where green tea is a daily habit, so the results may not carry to other populations.
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at both low and high hematocrit in an Iranian cohort of 49,983 adults and in the Framingham cohort.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 49,983 Iranian adults followed for a mean of 5 years, the relation between hematocrit and death was U-shaped in both sexes. In women, against 35% to 39%, adjusted hazard ratios for death were 2.12 (95% CI 1.26 to 3.58) at 15% to 29%, 1.58 (1.29 to 1.93) at 45% to 49% and 2.05 (1.17 to 3.60) at 50% to 54%. In men, against 40% to 44%, they were 2.12 (1.30 to 3.45) at 15% to 29%, 1.64 (1.22 to 2.21) at 30% to 34% and 1.29 (1.04 to 1.61) at 50% to 54%. Deaths from cardiovascular disease followed the same pattern [7]. In the Framingham cohort over 34 years, people in the highest fifth of hematocrit had more deaths from any cause and more cardiovascular disease, and women with lower values also had more cardiovascular events, which the authors describe as a J-shaped or U-shaped relation [8].
- Population
- 49,983 adults aged 40 to 75 in the Golestan Cohort Study in northeast Iran, 2,262 deaths [7]. 5,209 men and women in the Framingham cohort [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Observational. In the Iranian cohort, leaving out the first 2 years of follow-up weakened the association at low hematocrit in both sexes and removed the association at high hematocrit in men, which points to illness before death as part of the explanation. That cohort measured hematocrit by spinning blood in a tube, not by analyzer [7]. The Framingham abstract gives no hazard ratios [8].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at both low and high levels in three cohorts of middle-aged and older adults, with the lowest risk in the middle of the range.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 5,888 US adults aged 65 and older followed 11.2 years, the lowest fifth of hemoglobin (below 13.7 g/dL in men, below 12.6 g/dL in women) and the highest fifth had adjusted hazard ratios for death of 1.33 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.54) and 1.17 (1.01 to 1.36) against the fourth fifth. Anemia by WHO criteria had a hazard ratio of 1.38 (1.19 to 1.54) [9]. In 17,030 Canadian adults aged 66 and older, hemoglobin below 11.0 g/dL in people with normal kidney function had a hazard ratio for death of 4.29 (3.55 to 5.12), and risk was lowest at 13.0 to 15.0 g/dL in women and 14.0 to 17.0 g/dL in men [10]. In 292,194 Korean adults over 40, the association with cardiovascular and all-cause death was U-shaped or J-shaped. Men whose anemia had resolved by a second exam had a hazard ratio for death of 0.67 (0.59 to 0.77) against men whose anemia persisted [11].
- Population
- 5,888 community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older in 4 US communities [9]. 17,030 community-dwelling adults aged 66 and older in Calgary, 1,983 deaths over about 3 years [10]. 170,078 men and 122,116 women without cardiovascular disease, median follow-up 8 years [11].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. Illness that lowers or raises hemoglobin before death cannot be ruled out, although adjustment for kidney function, inflammation and frailty did not remove the association in the US cohort [9].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at both ends: above 6.0% and below 5.0% in people without diabetes, and above 9.0% and below 6.0% in people with diabetes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of observational studies found higher death rates from any cause in people without diabetes at HbA1c above 6.0% (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.20) and below 5.0% (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.36). In people with diabetes, rates were higher above 9.0% (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.66) and below 6.0% (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.17). Results for cardiovascular death were similar [10]. A US cohort of adults without diabetes also found a J-shaped association with death from any cause [8].
- Population
- 46 observational studies in the meta-analysis, of 74 reviewed [10]. 11,092 adults [8].
- Sources
- [10], [8]
- Caveats
- Observational. The excess at low values may reflect illness or conditions that lower HbA1c, not an effect of low blood sugar itself, and the studies cannot separate the two.
Fibromyalgia pain
Shown to reduce pain in people with fibromyalgia in one meta-analysis of 9 small studies. Adverse events occurred in 23.8% of treated patients.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 9 studies (288 patients), hyperbaric oxygen reduced pain compared with control (SMD -1.56, 95% CI -2.18 to -0.93, I² 51%). Most studies also reported better tender points, fatigue, function and sleep disturbance. Adverse events occurred in 44 of 185 patients (23.8%), and 12 (6.5%) withdrew because of them [7].
- Population
- 288 people with fibromyalgia in 9 randomized and non-randomized controlled trials [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The pooled studies include non-randomized trials, and the abstract does not say how many used a sham. No serious adverse events were observed.
Prostate cancer and other cancers
Linked to more prostate cancer at higher levels, 29% more in the top fifth across pooled prospective studies, with mixed directions for other cancer sites.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In pooled individual data from prospective studies, men in the highest fifth of IGF-1 had an odds ratio for prostate cancer of 1.29 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.43) against the lowest fifth, and the association did not differ by time to diagnosis or by tumor stage or grade [8]. In UK Biobank, each 5 nmol/L higher IGF-1 had a hazard ratio of 1.03 for cancer overall in both men and women (1.01 to 1.06), 1.10 for breast, 1.09 for prostate, 1.07 for colorectal and 1.22 for thyroid cancer. It was 0.91 for lung, 0.86 for ovarian and 0.32 for liver cancer [9].
- Population
- Up to 10,554 men with prostate cancer and 13,618 controls in 17 prospective and 2 cross-sectional studies [8]. 412,645 adults followed for a median 7.2 years [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Observational. The inverse association with lung cancer appeared only in people who had ever smoked [9].
Death in acromegaly after treatment that lowered IGF-1
Linked to mortality in acromegaly: deaths were near expected when treatment brought IGF-1 into the normal range, and 2.5 times expected when it stayed raised.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of mortality studies in acromegaly, a condition of excess growth hormone, people whose IGF-1 was normal for age and sex at last follow-up after treatment had a standardized mortality ratio of 1.1 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.4). People whose IGF-1 stayed raised had 2.5 (1.6 to 4.0) [12].
- Population
- Published mortality series in acromegaly from 1965 to 2008 that reported deaths by hormone level at last follow-up [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Observational comparisons within a rare disease, not randomized. People whose IGF-1 came down may have differed in other ways from those in whom it did not.
Pain after surgery
Shown to cut pain after surgery by about 19% and opioid use by about 8 mg morphine over 24 hours, when given around the operation.
Compared with placebo, or a basic pain reliever alone [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Perioperative intravenous ketamine reduced opioid use over 24 hours by 8 mg morphine equivalents (19% of 42 mg on placebo) and over 48 hours by 13 mg. Pain at rest fell 5 points on a 100 mm scale at 24 hours (19% lower) and 48 hours, and pain on movement 6 points. Time to first pain relief request lengthened by 54 minutes. Nausea and vomiting fell from 27% to 23% [10].
- Population
- 8,341 adults in 130 trials across many operations [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Most trials had fewer than 50 people per arm, with small-study effects. No analysis by dose was possible [10].
Chronic pain
Shown to lower chronic pain scores by about 1.8 points on a 10-point scale for up to 2 weeks after an infusion, with 51% responding against 19%.
Compared with placebo infusions [11]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Up to 2 weeks after an infusion, pain scores fell 1.83 points more than placebo on a 0 to 10 scale (95% CI 1.31 to 2.35). In 3 studies reporting responders, 51.3% on ketamine and 19.4% on placebo responded (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.40) [11].
- Population
- 211 patients with neuropathic, mixed or other chronic pain in 7 trials [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- All but one trial had high risk of bias, and follow-up was short [11].
Death from any cause and from heart and vessel disease
Linked to more deaths at higher MCV in two East Asian cohorts, including a 44% to 55% higher death rate in the top quarter of non-anemic Korean adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In non-anemic Korean adults, the top quarter of MCV (95.8 fL or above in men, 94.2 fL or above in women) had adjusted hazard ratios for death from any cause of 1.44 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.80) in men and 1.55 (1.08 to 2.22) in women, against a reference group at 90.5 to 93.0 fL in men and 89.2 to 91.6 fL in women. In men the hazard ratio for death from liver cancer was 3.55 (1.75 to 7.21) [10]. In a Taiwanese community cohort, higher MCV went with more deaths from stroke and heart disease combined (adjusted hazard ratio 1.42, P for trend 0.012) [11].
- Population
- 36,260 adults aged 40 and older having routine check-ups in Seoul, 1,107 deaths over a mean 8.0 years [10]. 66,294 adults aged 20 and older in Keelung, Taiwan, followed 9 years [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational, in two East Asian populations. The Taiwanese abstract does not state which MCV levels were compared, and its findings for single causes of death did not reach significance [11]. Neither study shows that MCV itself changes risk.
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at higher levels in US and Dutch cohorts, 62% more at 250 nmol/L or above than below 120.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a US national survey cohort, adults with methylmalonic acid of 250 nmol/L or more, compared with below 120, had hazard ratios of 1.62 (95% CI 1.43 to 1.84) for death from any cause and 1.66 (1.22 to 2.27) for cardiovascular death after adjustment. The association was especially marked in people with normal B12 and was repeated in a later round of the survey [9]. In a Dutch cohort, each doubling of methylmalonic acid had a hazard ratio for death of 1.67 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.22), independent of vitamin B12, kidney function and sex, and more pronounced in people with impaired kidney function [10].
- Population
- 23,437 US adults, with 3,019 deaths over a median 13.5 years in the 1999 to 2004 rounds [9]. 1,533 Dutch adults aged 60 to 75 followed for 8.5 years, 72 deaths [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Observational. In the Dutch cohort, vitamin B12, kidney function, age and sex together explained 22% of the variation in methylmalonic acid, so a raised level reflects more than B12 status. No trial cited here tested whether lowering it changes survival [10].
Fibromyalgia
Shown to improve overall fibromyalgia symptoms with cyclobenzaprine, with about 5 treated for one extra person improved, and no change in fatigue or tender points.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 5 placebo-controlled trials, people on cyclobenzaprine were more likely to report overall improvement (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.6), a risk difference of 0.21 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.34) and a number needed to treat of 4.8 (95% CI 3.0 to 11). Pain improved early in treatment and sleep improved. Fatigue and tender points did not improve at any time [9].
- Population
- People with fibromyalgia in 5 randomized, placebo-controlled trials of cyclobenzaprine [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis of 5 trials, of cyclobenzaprine only. Not an FDA-approved use [10].
Heart disease, diabetes and death in cohorts
Linked to lower death, heart attack, stroke and type 2 diabetes rates with higher adherence in cohort studies, at low certainty.
Compared with people with the lowest adherence to Nordic dietary patterns, in European cohorts [2]; people with lower adherence to the Nordic dietary pattern [9]; people in the lowest category of Nordic diet adherence [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 13 cohorts (930,153 people), high against low adherence was linked to lower all-cause death (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.87), cardiovascular death (RR 0.78), stroke (RR 0.88), heart attack (RR 0.80) and type 2 diabetes (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99) [10]. In 15 cohorts, total cardiovascular disease was 7% lower (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99, I² 88%) [2]. A 2025 meta-analysis of 32 cohorts found 12% lower type 2 diabetes and 8% lower cardiovascular disease [9].
- Population
- Adults in prospective cohorts, observational [2][9][10].
- Sources
- [2], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Observational. Certainty ranged from very low to low [10], and was low for total cardiovascular disease [2].
Death from any cause and from cardiovascular disease
Linked to about 2.4 times the deaths from any cause in the highest against the lowest category across 11 general population studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of prospective studies in the general population, the highest category of NT-proBNP against the lowest had a hazard ratio of 2.44 (95% CI 2.11 to 2.83) for death from any cause, 3.77 (2.85 to 5.00) for cardiovascular death and 2.35 (1.45 to 3.82) for death from coronary heart disease [7]. Among patients with acute heart failure in a pooled emergency department study, a level above 5,180 pg/mL at presentation went with death within 76 days (OR 5.2, 95% CI 2.2 to 8.1) [5]. In a meta-analysis by kidney function, the unadjusted risk ratio for death with a raised NT-proBNP was 3.01 (2.53 to 3.58) in patients with preserved kidney function and 3.25 (2.45 to 4.30) in patients with reduced function [8].
- Population
- 25,715 people in 11 studies [7]. 720 patients with acute heart failure among 1,256 with acute breathlessness [5]. 32,203 patients in 30 studies [8].
- Sources
- [7], [5], [8]
- Caveats
- Observational. The studies defined the highest and lowest categories by different cut points [7].
Death from any cause
Linked to fewer deaths at higher blood levels of long-chain omega-3: 15% to 18% lower risk in the top fifth than the bottom across 17 pooled cohorts.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a pooled analysis of 17 prospective cohorts, risk of death from any cause was 15% to 18% lower in the highest than the lowest fifth of circulating EPA, DPA and DHA after adjustment for other risk factors. Similar relations were seen for death from cardiovascular disease, cancer and other causes, and none for the plant omega-3 alpha-linolenic acid [7]. In the Framingham Offspring cohort, the highest fifth of the omega-3 index had a 34% lower risk of death from any cause than the lowest [6].
- Population
- 42,466 people with 15,720 deaths over a median 16 years [7]. 2,500 participants with 350 deaths [6].
- Sources
- [7], [6]
- Caveats
- Observational. The pooled analysis measured omega-3 fatty acids in several blood fractions, not only as the red cell index [7].
Acute pain after surgery
Shown to relieve pain after surgery in single doses, with about 3 adults given oxycodone 10 mg plus acetaminophen for one extra with half pain relief.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- For at least 50% pain relief after surgery, the number needed to treat against placebo was 4.6 (95% CI 2.9 to 11) for oxycodone 15 mg alone and 2.7 (2.4 to 3.1) for oxycodone 10 mg plus paracetamol 650 mg, with a dose response for the combination. Relief lasted 10 hours at that combination dose and 4 hours at half of it. Adverse events were more frequent than on placebo [1]. In individual patient data from 18 single-dose trials, tramadol 50, 100 and 150 mg had numbers needed to treat of 7.1 (4.6 to 18), 4.8 (3.4 to 8.2) and 2.4 (2.0 to 3.1) in pain after surgery, with more adverse events at higher doses [2].
- Population
- 2,641 adults in 20 studies of oxycodone [1]; 3,453 patients with moderate or severe pain after surgery or dental extraction in 18 trials of tramadol [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Single doses followed for hours. The evidence here is for oxycodone and tramadol.
Athletic performance
Shown to improve maximal and aerobic performance by a small amount in 15 small trials, with no change in anaerobic performance.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Glucocorticoids had a small effect on maximal physical performance against placebo (standardized difference 0.300, 95% CI 0.080 to 0.520). The effect was seen with oral dosing (0.361, 95% CI 0.124 to 0.598), with prolonged treatment (0.428, 95% CI 0.148 to 0.709) and for aerobic performance (0.371, 95% CI 0.173 to 0.569). Anaerobic performance and energy use during submaximal exercise did not change [16].
- Population
- 175 subjects in 15 randomized trials [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- Few participants, and two studies were at high risk of bias. The authors describe the estimates as uncertain [16].
Infant colic and excessive crying
Shown to cut crying by about 1.3 hours a day in pooled manual therapy trials, which included chiropractic and osteopathy and mostly had parents who knew the treatment.
Compared with no physical treatment, sham treatment or a drug, depending on the trial [10]; no treatment for 3 weeks [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Manual therapy reduced crying by 1.27 hours a day (95% CI -2.19 to -0.36). Effects on sleep and parent-child relations were inconclusive, and parent-reported global improvement showed no effect [10]. In 103 infants with colic, three osteopathic treatments lowered parents' psychological stress by 3.5 points on a 0 to 10 scale more than 3 weeks without treatment (95% CI 2.6 to 4.4), with similar changes in crying time and intensity [11].
- Population
- 7 randomized trials among 19 studies of otherwise healthy crying infants [10]. 103 infants aged 1 week to 3 months in Germany [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- The review pooled osteopathy with chiropractic and massage [10]. Crying was reported by parents, who knew whether their baby was treated in the 2025 trial [11]. Results from trials with parents blinded are on the chiropractic page.
Hospital stay in premature babies
Shown to shorten hospital stays in premature babies by about 2.7 days when added to usual neonatal care, in five trials.
Compared with usual neonatal care, with an osteopathic evaluation and no treatment in 3 of 5 trials [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Babies given osteopathic treatment as well as usual care left hospital 2.71 days sooner (95% CI -3.99 to -1.43) and cost less to treat. The benefit was larger in babies born earlier. No study reported adverse events linked to treatment [14].
- Population
- 1,306 preterm infants in 5 trials [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was moderate (I² 61%). The review used a fixed-effect model [14].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at low counts in two European cohorts, and at counts above 300 thousand/µL in one of them.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In Danish adults with counts of 100 to 450 thousand/µL, the relationship with death was U-shaped, with more deaths below 175 or above 300. Against 201 to 250, a count of 301 to 450 had an adjusted hazard ratio for death of 1.42 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.90) [7]. In Italian adults, a count under the lower limit for age and sex had a hazard ratio of 1.92 (1.38 to 2.67) for death from any cause, 1.77 (1.03 to 3.05) for cancer death and 3.16 (1.84 to 5.42) for deaths that were neither cardiovascular nor cancer. A count over the upper limit was not associated with any cause of death [8].
- Population
- 21,252 adults aged 20 and older in a Danish general population study [7]. 21,563 adults, mean age 55.6, in the Moli-sani study, 1,130 deaths over a median 8.2 years [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Observational. The two cohorts disagree about counts toward the high end. In the Italian study 87.7% of the low counts were still above 100 thousand/µL [8]. An illness that alters the platelet count before death cannot be ruled out.
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at both low and high potassium, with the lowest risk at 4 to 4.5 mEq/L across 1.2 million people.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an individual-level meta-analysis of 27 cohorts, the relation between potassium and death was U-shaped, with the lowest risk at 4 to 4.5 mmol/L. Against 4.2 mmol/L, the adjusted hazard ratio for death from any cause was 1.22 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.29) at 5.5 mmol/L and 1.49 (1.26 to 1.76) at 3.0 mmol/L. Risks were similar across levels of kidney function [8]. In two US community cohorts, potassium of 5.0 mEq/L or above went with more deaths from any cause than 4.0 to 4.4 mEq/L (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.76), and the association was stronger in people using diuretics [9].
- Population
- 1,217,986 participants in 10 general population, 7 high cardiovascular risk and 10 chronic kidney disease cohorts, followed for a mean of 6.9 years [8]. 9,651 adults free of cardiovascular disease in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and the Cardiovascular Health Study [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Observational, from potassium measured in outpatients at baseline. The authors of the US cohort study write that whether keeping potassium within the normal range improves outcomes requires future study [9].
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at higher RDW in community cohorts, about 14% more per 1 point in pooled data on 11,827 older adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a pooled analysis of individual data from 7 community studies of older adults, each 1 point higher RDW went with a 14% higher risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.17). Hazard ratios were 1.15 for cardiovascular death, 1.13 for cancer death and 1.13 for other causes. Among 1,603 people without major age-associated diseases it was 1.32 (1.21 to 1.44) [6]. In a US national sample aged 45 and older, the top fifth of RDW had a hazard ratio of 2.1 (1.7 to 2.6) against the bottom fifth, and each 1 point went with 22% more deaths (1.22, 1.15 to 1.30) [5]. In UK Biobank volunteers free of major disease and anemia, an RDW of 15% or above had a hazard ratio for death of 3.10 (2.57 to 3.74) against below 12.5% [7].
- Population
- 11,827 older adults over 68,822 person-years [6]. 8,175 community-dwelling US adults aged 45 and older, followed through 2000 [5]. 240,477 volunteers aged 40 to 70, followed up to 9 years [7].
- Sources
- [6], [5], [7]
- Caveats
- Observational. Median RDW differed between studies, from 13.2% to 14.6% [6]. The sources do not test whether changing RDW changes the risk of death, and the pooled analysis describes the biology behind the link as not established [6].
Cancer
Linked to more new cancers and cancer deaths at higher RDW in two sets of cohorts, including 37% more cancers at 15% or above in UK volunteers.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In UK Biobank volunteers free of cancer at the start, an RDW of 15% or above went with more new cancer than an RDW below 12.5% (subhazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.55), including colorectal cancer (1.92, 1.36 to 2.72) and leukemia (2.85, 1.63 to 4.97) [7]. In pooled community studies of older adults, the hazard ratio for cancer death was 1.13 per 1 point (1.07 to 1.20) [6].
- Population
- 240,477 UK volunteers aged 40 to 70, followed up to 9 years [7]. 11,827 older adults in 7 studies [6].
- Sources
- [7], [6]
- Caveats
- Observational. A cancer not yet diagnosed may itself alter red cells, although the UK associations held 4.5 years or more after the blood test [7].
Fibromyalgia
Shown to improve fibromyalgia symptom, pain and fatigue scores compared with placebo laser in one meta-analysis. It added nothing to an exercise program.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 9 RCTs (325 patients), low-level laser improved Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire scores (SMD 1.16, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.69), pain severity (SMD 1.18, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.54), tender points, fatigue, stiffness, depression and anxiety more than placebo laser. Laser plus a standardized exercise program gave no extra symptom relief over exercise alone [10].
- Population
- 325 people with fibromyalgia in 9 RCTs [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis of small trials.
Quality of life
Shown to raise quality of life by a small amount (SMD 0.28) in pooled randomized trials, with an interval close to no effect.
Compared with control groups the source abstract does not describe [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Quality of life improved after Reiki (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.56, P = 0.043). Subgroups with 8 or more sessions of 60 minutes or more, and with short sessions of 20 minutes or less, showed the largest effects [11].
- Population
- 661 participants aged 14 and over, including people with cancer, surgical patients and people with chronic illness [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The lower end of the interval is near zero [11].
Death from any cause in men
Linked to fewer deaths in men at lower levels: 15% lower mortality in the bottom fifth of SHBG than the top fifth in pooled cohorts.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In pooled individual data from cohorts of community-dwelling men, the bottom fifth of SHBG (median 20.6 nmol/L) had lower mortality from any cause than the top fifth (median 68.3 nmol/L), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.95). For cardiovascular death it was 0.81 (0.65 to 1.00) [10].
- Population
- 9 cohorts with individual data covering 255,830 participant-years, plus 11 studies with summary estimates [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Observational, with differences between studies and imputed missing data. The direction runs opposite to the diabetes findings, where lower SHBG went with more disease [10][4].
Death from any cause at low sodium
Linked to more deaths at low sodium, about 2.6 times the risk across 81 pooled studies, with risk rising as sodium fell.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 81 studies, people with hyponatremia had a higher risk of death from any cause than people without it (RR 2.60, 95% CI 2.31 to 2.93). The association held in heart attack (RR 2.83), heart failure (2.47), cirrhosis (3.34), lung infections (2.49) and hospitalized patients (2.48). People who died had a mean sodium 4.8 mmol/L lower than survivors (130.1 against 134.9 mmol/L) [8]. In US veterans with chronic kidney disease, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.93 (95% CI 1.83 to 2.03) below 130 mEq/L and 1.28 (1.26 to 1.30) at 130 to 135.9 mEq/L, against 136 to 145 mEq/L [9]. On admission to intensive care, the adjusted odds of death in hospital were 1.32 (1.25 to 1.39) at 130 to 134 mmol/L, 1.89 (1.71 to 2.09) at 125 to 129 and 1.81 (1.56 to 2.10) below 125 [6].
- Population
- 850,222 patients in 81 studies, 17.4% of them hyponatremic [8]. 655,493 US veterans with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis, followed for a median of 5.5 years [9]. 151,486 adults admitted to 77 Austrian intensive care units from 1998 to 2007 [6].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [6]
- Caveats
- Observational, and most of the people studied were already ill. The authors of a later trial write that it remains unclear whether hyponatremia itself increases illness and death or is an indicator of the severity of the underlying disease [10].
Death from any cause at high sodium
Linked to more deaths at high sodium in intensive care and in chronic kidney disease, with the odds reaching 3.6 times above 155 mEq/L.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- On admission to intensive care, the adjusted odds of death in hospital were 1.48 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.61) at 146 to 150 mmol/L, 2.32 (1.98 to 2.73) at 151 to 155 and 3.64 (2.88 to 4.61) above 155, against 135 to 145 mmol/L [6]. In US veterans with chronic kidney disease, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.33 (1.28 to 1.38) at 145.1 to 150 mEq/L and 1.56 (1.33 to 1.83) at 150 mEq/L or above, against 136 to 145 mEq/L. Mortality was lowest at 140 mEq/L [9].
- Population
- 151,486 adults admitted to Austrian intensive care units, 6.9% of them with sodium above 145 mmol/L [6]. 655,493 US veterans with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis [9].
- Sources
- [6], [9]
- Caveats
- Observational, in people who were critically ill or had kidney disease. These studies cannot say whether high sodium caused the deaths or marked the illness behind it.
Pain in many conditions, compared with placebo TENS
Shown to lower pain during or right after use against placebo TENS in adults with many kinds of pain, across 91 trials, at moderate certainty.
Compared with placebo TENS [8]; sham TENS [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pain was lower during or immediately after TENS than with placebo (SMD -0.96, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.78, 91 trials, 4,841 people), and acute or chronic pain, diagnosis and risk of bias did not change the effect [8]. An overview of Cochrane reviews of chronic pain found one review with lower pain against sham (MD -1.58, 95% CI -2.08 to -1.09 on a 0 to 10 scale, 5 trials, 207 people), and rated all its evidence very low in quality [9].
- Population
- 24,532 adults with pain in 381 trials [8]. 2,895 people in 51 trials across 8 Cochrane reviews [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Most trials were small, and effects were measured during or right after a session. The overview found too little usable data to report on lasting relief or daily function [9].
Pain in many conditions, compared with usual treatments
Shown to lower pain during or right after use more than medicines or other usual treatments, across 61 trials in adults, at low certainty.
Compared with drug and non-drug treatments used as standard care [8]
Death from any cause at high levels
Linked to more deaths at a saturation of 50% or above, about 40% more than below 50% in two Danish population studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In two Danish general population studies combined, a transferrin saturation of 50% or above had an adjusted hazard ratio for death of 1.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.6) against below 50%, 1.3 in men and 1.5 in women. Risk rose stepwise, and 80% or above against below 20% had a hazard ratio of 2.2 (1.4 to 3.3). Adding a third population study, the pooled odds ratio for death at 50% or above was 1.3 (1.2 to 1.5) [10]. In a US national cohort, a saturation above 55% had a hazard ratio of 1.60 (1.17 to 2.21) against lower values. No death certificate listed hemochromatosis, and people above 55% were more likely to have died of cirrhosis or diabetes [11].
- Population
- 45,159 Danish adults, 4,568 deaths over up to 18 years [10]. 10,714 US adults aged 25 to 74 at baseline, followed from the early 1970s to 1992 [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. The share of all deaths in the Danish studies attributable to a saturation of 50% or above was 0.8% [10]. Neither source shows that lowering saturation changes the risk of death.
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at higher levels: 9% more at 150 to 199 mg/dL and 20% more at 200 mg/dL or above in a meta-analysis of cohorts.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against triglycerides of 90 to 149 mg/dL, pooled risk ratios for death from any cause were 0.94 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.03) below 90 mg/dL, 1.09 (1.02 to 1.17) at 150 to 199 mg/dL and 1.20 (1.04 to 1.38) at 200 mg/dL or above. For cardiovascular death they were 0.83, 1.15 and 1.25. Risk of death from any cause rose 12% per 1 mmol/L higher triglycerides [22]. In a Danish cohort, adjusted hazard ratios for death at non-fasting triglycerides of 5 mmol/L or more, against below 1 mmol/L, were 3.3 in women and 1.8 in men [12].
- Population
- 61 prospective studies, with 58,419 deaths from any cause among 330,566 participants [22]. 13,981 adults in Copenhagen followed a mean 26 years [12].
- Sources
- [22], [12]
- Caveats
- Observational. The studies cannot separate triglycerides from the conditions that raise them.
Exposure markers after switching from cigarettes
Shown to lower exhaled carbon monoxide and most measured markers of potential harm in people who switched fully from cigarettes to e-cigarettes in quit trials.
Compared with people who kept smoking cigarettes [5]; dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Exhaled carbon monoxide was 9.57 ppm lower in people using only e-cigarettes than in people who kept smoking (95% CI -17.30 to -1.83, 3 studies). Against continued smoking, 12 of 13 markers of potential harm were significantly lower in e-cigarette users, with no difference in the 13th. Against dual users, 12 of 25 markers were lower in e-cigarette users and 5 were lower in dual users [5].
- Population
- 1,299 adults who smoked and were given e-cigarettes in 9 studies in Greece, Italy, Poland, the UK and the US [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- People chose whether to switch fully, so the groups were not randomized against each other. Only one study had data on people who used neither product [5]. Lower exposure markers do not show lower disease.
Child deaths and illness
Shown to lower child deaths about 12% in children aged 6 months to 5 years, mostly in Asia and Africa.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 19 trials, death from any cause was 12% lower with vitamin A than with control (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.93). Deaths from diarrhea were also 12% lower (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.98). Deaths from measles did not significantly differ (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11) [1].
- Population
- 47 trials with about 1,223,856 children aged 6 months to 5 years in 19 countries, mostly in Asia and Africa. 19 trials with 1,202,382 children reported mortality [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The authors rated the mortality evidence high certainty. Children in hospital or with disease were left out. Most trials ran about a year [1].
Death in young children where deficiency is common
Shown in trials to cut deaths 12% in children aged 6 months to 5 years given vitamin A in countries where deficiency is common.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Cochrane review, vitamin A supplementation reduced deaths from any cause (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.93, 19 trials, 1,202,382 children, high-certainty evidence) and deaths from diarrhea (RR 0.88, 0.79 to 0.98). It reduced night blindness (RR 0.32, 0.21 to 0.50), Bitot's spots (RR 0.42, 0.33 to 0.53) and vitamin A deficiency itself (RR 0.71, 0.65 to 0.78, 4 studies, 2,262 children). Deaths from measles and from respiratory disease did not differ [8].
- Population
- 47 studies with about 1,223,856 children in 19 countries, 30 of the studies in Asia. The mean age was about 33 months [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- The trials gave vitamin A to children in the community whatever their own serum retinol, so they show what supplementation did in populations with widespread deficiency. They did not test treating a child according to a measured level, and they do not describe adults or populations where deficiency is rare [8].
Survival with cancer (intravenous)
Intravenous vitamin C was linked to longer survival in adults with cancer, with larger effects in cohort studies than in trials. Progression-free survival did not differ.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Intravenous vitamin C was associated with longer median overall survival than no vitamin C (median survival ratio 1.83, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.40). Progression-free survival did not significantly differ (ratio 1.80, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.41) [6].
- Population
- 8 RCTs and cohort studies with 2,722 adults with cancer, given 2.5 g a day to 1.5 g per kg a day for 9 days to 1 year [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- The review pooled cohort studies with RCTs, and the survival ratio was larger in cohort studies than in RCTs. It was also larger at doses under 1 g per kg and without chemotherapy. The authors rated the certainty moderate [6]. This describes intravenous treatment, not oral supplements.
Death from any cause
Linked to more deaths at higher counts, about 10% more for each 1 thousand/µL in a meta-analysis of 13 studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Each 1.0 thousand/µL higher white cell count had a pooled hazard ratio for death of 1.10 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.13). It was 1.10 (1.07 to 1.12) in people with cardiovascular disease and 1.12 (1.07 to 1.17) in the general population or people with COVID-19. For long-term death from any cause it was 1.09 (1.07 to 1.12), and for long-term cardiovascular death 1.05 (1.02 to 1.07) [10].
- Population
- 62,904 participants in 13 studies [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Observational, and the pooled studies mixed patients with heart disease, people with COVID-19 and the general population. The authors state that causality is not established [10].
Growth in children, in trials of zinc supplements
Shown in trials: zinc supplements raised serum zinc and increased height and weight gain in prepubertal children by about a third of a standard deviation.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, zinc supplementation increased height gain (effect size 0.350, 95% CI 0.189 to 0.511) and weight gain (0.309, 95% CI 0.178 to 0.439), with no significant effect on weight-for-height. Serum zinc rose by an effect size of 0.820 (95% CI 0.499 to 1.14). Growth responses were greater in children with low initial weight-for-age, and in those older than 6 months with low initial height-for-age [5]. A technical document from a zinc expert group reports that in an earlier version of the analysis, lower starting serum zinc went with a larger growth response, a relationship that was not statistically significant once severely malnourished children were excluded [1].
- Population
- Prepubertal children in 33 studies [5].
- Sources
- [5], [1]
- Caveats
- Effect sizes are in standard deviation units across trials in different countries. The trials show the effect of giving zinc and do not show that a child's own serum zinc predicts the response [1][5].
Death rates in people with ADHD
Linked to lower two-year mortality in people starting ADHD medication after diagnosis, 39.1 against 48.1 deaths per 10,000, in one Swedish cohort.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Two-year mortality was 39.1 per 10,000 in people who started ADHD medication and 48.1 per 10,000 in those who did not (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.88). Deaths from unnatural causes were lower (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86), and deaths from natural causes did not differ (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.05) [20].
- Population
- 148,578 people aged 6 to 64 with newly diagnosed ADHD in Sweden, 56.7% of whom started medication [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- Observational, and it covers all ADHD medications, not stimulants alone. People who start medication may differ from those who do not in ways the analysis could not measure.
Death and complications after surgery
One US veterans cohort linked lower albumin before surgery to more deaths within 30 days, from under 1% above 4.6 g/dL to 29% below 2.1 g/dL.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A fall in albumin from above 46 g/L (4.6 g/dL) to below 21 g/L (2.1 g/dL) was associated with an exponential rise in 30-day mortality from less than 1% to 29% and in complications from 10% to 65%. Among 62 preoperative variables, albumin was the strongest predictor of death and complications, and it predicted sepsis and major infections more closely than other complications [9].
- Population
- 54,215 major noncardiac surgery cases at 44 Veterans Affairs medical centers [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Observational, one cohort, published in 1999. It does not show that raising albumin before surgery changes the outcome.
Energy and fatigue in healthy people
Small trials found a B complex lengthened time to exhaustion in 32 young adults, and a B, C and mineral product raised self-rated stamina in working men.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a double-blind crossover trial, 28 days of a B1, B2, B6 and B12 product (Ex PLUS) raised running time to exhaustion 1.26-fold over placebo (p < 0.05) and lowered blood lactate and ammonia during and after exercise [10]. In 198 employed men given a B complex with vitamin C and minerals or placebo for 28 days, the supplement group rated themselves higher for physical stamina across assessments, and for concentration, mental stamina and alertness after a working day at some time points [11].
- Population
- 32 healthy adults aged 20 to 30, half women [10]. 198 men aged 30 to 55 in full-time work [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Two small trials of branded products. The second product also held vitamin C and minerals, so the B vitamins' share cannot be separated [11]. Ratings were self-reported, and effects in [11] appeared at some time points and not others.
Lung disease and death from any cause
One UK cohort of 504,206 adults linked higher bilirubin within the usual range to less lung cancer, less chronic obstructive lung disease and fewer deaths.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- For each 0.1 mg/dL higher bilirubin, the adjusted rate of lung cancer was 8% lower in men (95% CI 5% to 11%) and 11% lower in women (7% to 14%). In men the rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was 6% lower (5% to 7%) and the death rate 3% lower (2% to 3%), with very similar results in women. Median bilirubin was 0.64 mg/dL in men and 0.53 mg/dL in women [8].
- Population
- 504,206 adults in a UK primary care database with no evidence of liver, bile duct or hemolytic disease, with 1,341 lung cancers, 5,863 cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 23,103 deaths [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- One cohort, observational, in people whose bilirubin was within the normal range [8]. Bilirubin was lower in active smokers in US survey data, so how fully smoking was accounted for matters to this result [5].
Death in people with Gilbert syndrome
One UK cohort found people with Gilbert syndrome had about half the death rate of people with normal bilirubin.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Mortality was 24 per 10,000 person-years in people with a diagnosis of Gilbert syndrome and a raised bilirubin, and 50 per 10,000 in a comparison cohort with normal bilirubin. After accounting for sociodemographic factors and general health indicators, the mortality rate ratio was 0.5 (95% CI 0.4 to 0.7) [10].
- Population
- 4,266 patients with Gilbert syndrome and 21,968 comparison patients in a UK primary care database, with 1,174 deaths over 350,000 person-years [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- One cohort, observational. It counted people whose Gilbert syndrome had been diagnosed and recorded, who may differ from people with the same trait and no diagnosis.
Death from any cause in the general population
One US cohort found 48% more deaths from any cause in the highest quarter of BUN than in the lowest over about 12 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 17,719 US adults followed for a mean of 11.65 years, people in the highest quarter of BUN (5.71 mmol/L or above, about 16 mg/dL) had more deaths from any cause than those in the lowest quarter (below 3.57 mmol/L, about 10 mg/dL), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.48 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.72). The hazard ratio for cardiovascular death was 1.48 (1.08 to 2.02). In subgroups the trend held most clearly in women [5].
- Population
- 17,719 adults in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2006, with 3,628 deaths, 859 from cardiovascular disease [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- Observational, one cohort, one BUN measurement per person. The models adjusted for demographics, lifestyle, hypertension and diabetes. The abstract does not list kidney function among the adjustments, and the test is used as a marker of kidney disease [2][5].
Death in adults without diabetes
Limited evidence: two analyses of one US survey linked the highest quarter of fasting C-peptide to about 70% to 80% more deaths in adults without diabetes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 5,153 adults aged 40 to 74 without diabetes, the highest quarter of fasting C-peptide, 0.984 nmol/L (about 2.97 ng/mL) or above, had an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.72 (95% CI 1.34 to 2.21) for death from any cause and 1.60 (1.07 to 2.39) for cardiovascular death against the lowest quarter, 0.418 nmol/L (about 1.26 ng/mL) or below. C-peptide predicted these deaths better than fasting glucose, insulin or indices built from them [7]. In 5,902 adults aged 40 and older from the same survey, the highest quarter had a hazard ratio of 1.80 (1.33 to 2.43) for death from any cause and 3.20 (2.07 to 4.93) for cardiovascular death against the lowest [8].
- Population
- 5,153 adults without diabetes in the third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 1988 to 1994, followed for a median of 14.4 years with 513 deaths [7]. 5,902 adults with no history of diabetes in the same survey, mean C-peptide 0.78 nmol/L [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Observational, and both analyses draw on the same survey, so they are not independent. The authors read a high C-peptide in a person without diabetes as a sign of insulin resistance. Neither source tested whether lowering it changes the risk of death [7][8].
Well-being
Limited evidence: in a self-report survey, 95% of followers said their overall health improved.
Compared with no comparison group [1], [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Respondents reported improved overall health (95%), well-being (66% to 91% across measures) and high satisfaction [1]. German followers commonly reported subjective health improvements [3].
- Population
- 2,029 survey respondents [1]; 24 German followers [3].
- Sources
- [1], [3]
- Caveats
- Self-reported by people who chose the diet and stayed on it [1].
Death from any cause
Limited evidence: one Dutch cohort of 5,226 older adults linked an ESR of 20 to 50 to 23% more deaths, and above 50 to 89% more.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against an ESR below 20 mm/hr, the adjusted hazard ratio for death from any cause was 1.23 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.35) at 20 to 50 mm/hr and 1.89 (1.38 to 2.60) above 50 mm/hr. In people older than 75 with no other illness recorded, an ESR above 20 mm/hr still had a hazard ratio of 1.29 (1.01 to 1.64) [7].
- Population
- 5,226 participants in the Rotterdam Study, mean age 70.3, with 3,749 deaths over a median of 14.9 years [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort of older adults. ESR is a nonspecific sign of illness, and the source did not test whether lowering it changes the risk of death [7].
Cancer diagnosed within a year
Limited evidence: in UK primary care, a raised inflammatory marker went with a 3.5% chance of a cancer diagnosis within a year, against 1.5% when normal.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- One-year cancer incidence was 3.53% (95% CI 3.37 to 3.70) in patients with a raised inflammatory marker, 1.50% (1.43 to 1.58) in patients whose markers were normal and 0.97% (0.87 to 1.07) in untested controls. Risk was greater with higher marker levels, older age and in men. The sensitivity of ESR for cancer was 43.6%, so more than half of the people with cancer had an ESR that was not raised [12].
- Population
- 160,000 UK primary care patients with an inflammatory marker test in 2014 and 40,000 untested matched controls, linked to the cancer registry [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Observational. The incidence figures pool three markers, C-reactive protein, ESR and plasma viscosity, and the test was ordered for a reason in each patient. The authors state that inflammatory markers are not useful for ruling cancer out [12].
Diagnoses found at 100 mm/hr or above
Limited evidence: among 4,807 clinic patients with an ESR of 100 or above, infection was found in 40%, autoimmune disease in 38% and malignancy in 36%.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The leading diagnosis associated with an ESR of 100 mm/hr or above was infection (1,932 patients, 40%), followed by autoimmune disease (1,839, 38%) and malignancy (1,736, 36%). The authors report that almost all patients had an identifiable cause. Values were slightly higher in men than in women, and did not correlate with age, race or C-reactive protein [10].
- Population
- 4,807 patients with an ESR of 100 mm/hr or above examined at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from 2002 to 2011 [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Retrospective, at one referral center, with no comparison group below 100 mm/hr. The diagnosis groups overlap [10].
Death from any cause, in cohorts
Linked to lower death from any cause and heart disease for cheese and fermented milks in cohorts. Miso and bread showed no link.
Compared with the lowest intake categories [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Comparing highest with lowest intake, cheese and fermented milks including yogurt were linked to lower death from any cause and from cardiovascular disease, and fermented milk to lower cancer death. Miso and bread were not linked to death [12].
- Population
- More than 3 million participants in 50 cohort studies [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Observational. People who eat yogurt and cheese may differ in other habits, so confounding is possible. The abstract gives no effect sizes.
Senescent cell burden
Small trials found fewer senescent cell markers after dasatinib, a prescription cancer drug, plus quercetin. A review found clinical benefit not established.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Eleven days after 3 days of dasatinib 100 mg and quercetin 1,000 mg, fat tissue had fewer p16- and p21-expressing cells and fewer cells with senescence-associated β-galactosidase. Skin p16 and p21 cells and blood SASP factors, including IL-1α and IL-6, also fell [1]. In fibrotic MASH, liver single-nucleus sequencing showed decreased senescence and fibrosis gene signatures [2]. A 2026 systematic review of 6 completed human studies found reductions in senescence biomarkers with dasatinib plus quercetin [3]. In 97 coronary bypass patients, quercetin alone at 500 mg twice a day from 2 days before surgery to discharge reversed senescence and inflammaging gene pathways in artery cells from men, improved endothelial relaxation in men but not women (p 0.049 overall), and showed a trend toward lower C-reactive protein (p 0.073). Post-operative atrial fibrillation occurred in 4% on quercetin and 18% on placebo (p 0.033) [4].
- Population
- 9 adults with diabetic kidney disease, mean age 68.7 [1]; 31 adults with fibrotic MASH [2]; 6 completed human studies [3]; 97 patients (78 men) with coronary artery disease [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Trial [1] was open-label with no control group. These studies used dasatinib, a prescription cancer drug, not quercetin or fisetin alone. The review calls the evidence insufficient to establish clinical efficacy [3]. In the bypass trial, the gene findings were exploratory and the endothelial test was done on artery samples outside the body [4].
Cancer
One Swedish cohort of 545,460 people found cancer risk rose across GGT categories, 32% higher at 72 U/L or above than below 18 U/L.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Swedish cohort with 37,809 primary cancers, hazard ratios for any cancer against GGT below 18 U/L were 1.07 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.09) at 18 to 36 U/L, 1.18 (1.14 to 1.22) at 36 to 72 U/L and 1.32 (1.26 to 1.38) at 72 U/L or above. Associations with prostate, breast and liver cancer were stronger in people with glucose of 6.11 mmol/L or above [12].
- Population
- 545,460 people older than 20 in the Swedish Apolipoprotein Mortality Risk study [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Observational, one cohort. The abstract does not say whether the analysis adjusted for alcohol intake or smoking [12].
Death from any cause at very low and very high levels
Two Danish cohorts linked both low and extremely high HDL cholesterol to more deaths, with the lowest risk at 73 mg/dL in men and 93 mg/dL in women.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The association with death from any cause was U-shaped in both sexes. The level with the lowest risk was 73 mg/dL (95% CI 54 to 77) in men and 93 mg/dL (69 to 97) in women. Against the lowest-risk groups, adjusted hazard ratios were 1.36 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.70) for men at 97 to 115 mg/dL and 2.06 (1.44 to 2.95) at 116 mg/dL or above. For women they were 1.10 (0.83 to 1.46) at 116 to 134 mg/dL and 1.68 (1.09 to 2.58) at 135 mg/dL or above [18]. A European guideline states that above about 90 mg/dL there appears to be an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [4].
- Population
- 52,268 men and 64,240 women in two Copenhagen population studies, 745,452 person-years, 10,678 deaths [18].
- Sources
- [18], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational, from two cohorts in one Danish city, and the authors state the findings need confirmation in other studies [18]. The study cannot show that very high HDL cholesterol itself shortens life.
Chronic pain
One study found 77% of chronic pain patients given daily far-infrared sessions alongside usual treatment had returned to work at 2 years, against 50% without the sessions.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pain scores, pain behavior, depression and anger scores fell in both groups after 4 weeks of inpatient treatment. With added thermal therapy, anger scores were lower (p = 0.05) and pain behavior slightly lower (p = 0.07). Two years after discharge, 17 of 22 patients (77%) in the thermal group had returned to work against 12 of 24 (50%) (p < 0.05) [25]. A 2009 review rated the evidence for chronic pain as fair, from a single study [14].
- Population
- 46 inpatients with chronic pain on multidisciplinary treatment, 22 of whom also had daily far-infrared sauna for 4 weeks [25].
- Sources
- [25], [14]
- Caveats
- The abstract does not say that groups were randomized. Pain scores themselves did not differ between groups.
Fibromyalgia
Limited evidence: pain fell by about half in 13 women with fibromyalgia given Waon therapy, in a study with no control group.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- All 13 patients reported a reduction in pain of about half after the first session (range 11% to 70%), stable at 20% to 78% after 10 sessions. Pain and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire scores fell significantly (p < 0.01) [26].
- Population
- 13 women with fibromyalgia, mean age 45, treated 2 or 5 days a week [26].
- Sources
- [26]
- Caveats
- No control group and 13 participants, so the change cannot be separated from expectation.
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Limited evidence: perceived fatigue fell after 4 weeks of Waon therapy in 10 inpatients with chronic fatigue syndrome, in a study with no control group.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Perceived fatigue on a numerical scale decreased significantly after 4 weeks, with no significant reduction at 2 weeks. Negative mood and performance status improved. Pain and vigor did not change significantly [28]. A 2009 review rated the evidence for chronic fatigue syndrome as weak, from a single study [14].
- Population
- 10 consecutive inpatients, treated once a day, 5 days a week for 4 weeks [28].
- Sources
- [28], [14]
- Caveats
- Ten inpatients and no control group.
Quality of life in type 2 diabetes
Limited evidence: quality of life, stress and fatigue scores improved after 3 months of infrared sauna in people with type 2 diabetes, in a study with no control group.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After 20-minute sessions 3 times a week for 3 months, physical health, general health and social functioning scores on the SF-36v2 improved, as did visual analogue scores for stress and fatigue [29].
- Population
- Patients with type 2 diabetes at one rural Canadian health center [29].
- Sources
- [29]
- Caveats
- No control group. The abstract gives no participant count, no effect sizes and no blood sugar results.
Fatigue in healthy adults, high-dose vitamin C drip
One trial of 141 office workers found a 10 g vitamin C drip lowered current fatigue for a day more than saline, and usual fatigue did not differ.
Compared with an infusion of normal saline only [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Fatigue right now, on a 0 to 10 scale, fell from 5.64 to 5.10 at 2 hours and 4.97 at 1 day with vitamin C, and went from 5.54 to 5.31 and 5.66 with saline (p = 0.004). Usual fatigue (p = 0.870) and worst fatigue (p = 0.202) over the previous 24 hours did not differ. The effect appeared in people with low baseline vitamin C levels (p = 0.004) and not in those with high levels (p = 0.206) [3].
- Population
- 141 healthy office workers aged 20 to 49 in Korea, 70 given vitamin C and 71 saline, followed for one day [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- One trial measuring one day. At one day the two groups' changes differed by about 0.8 points on the 10-point scale. Hospital trials of intravenous vitamin C in sepsis and other critical illness are covered on the vitamin C page.
Long COVID
Limited evidence: fatigue, brain fog, sleep and pain improved from baseline in uncontrolled studies of long COVID. No randomized trials were found.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2026 systematic review screened 397 records and found no randomized trials. In 4 pre-post studies (155 people) at 1 to 6 mg a day, fatigue (Hedges' g -0.74, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.37), brain fog (g -0.53), sleep (g -0.60), pain (g -0.93) and daily function (g -0.93) improved from baseline [12].
- Population
- 155 people with long COVID in the US and Ireland in uncontrolled studies [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- The review rated certainty as low, and its studies had no control group [12]. No peer-reviewed randomized trial was located.
Death from any cause in men
One cohort found men in the highest quarter of LH had 32% higher mortality from any cause than men in the lowest quarter over up to 30 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Men in the highest LH quartile had higher mortality from any cause than men in the lowest (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.53), and higher LH went with more cancer deaths (1.42, 1.10 to 1.84). A higher ratio of LH to testosterone also went with more deaths (1.23, 1.06 to 1.43). Testosterone itself was not associated with death from any cause [7].
- Population
- 5,350 men from the general population aged 30 to 70 at baseline, followed for up to 30 years, with 1,533 deaths [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Observational, from one cohort. The abstract does not print the LH level that marks the top quartile. The authors read the result as a sign of impaired testicular function, so LH may mark illness and not cause it [7].
Mood, energy and quality of life
One trial found better mood, energy and quality of life than placebo over 12 weeks in Peruvian adults at low and high altitude.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 175 adults living at low and high altitude, 3 g a day of red or black maca extract for 12 weeks improved mood, energy, health-related quality of life and chronic mountain sickness scores compared with placebo. Black maca lowered blood glucose [7].
- Population
- Adults in Peru at low and high altitude [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One trial of spray-dried extracts.
Biological age markers
One small trial found lower epigenetic age on two clocks in an exploratory analysis in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an exploratory analysis, NR was linked to a modest rise in global DNA methylation and a lower epigenetic age on the PhenoAge and GrimAge clocks [3].
- Population
- 20 older adults with mild cognitive impairment over 10 weeks [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- An exploratory outcome in a 20-person pilot. Cognition did not change in the same trial [3].
Biological age markers
One manufacturer-funded trial found blood-test biological age held steady on NMN over 60 days while it rose on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Blood biological age, estimated with the Aging.Ai 3.0 calculator, rose in the placebo group over 60 days and stayed unchanged in all NMN groups, a significant difference between groups (all p < 0.05) [1].
- Population
- 80 healthy middle-aged adults [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- One manufacturer-funded trial. The calculator is a blood-test model, not an epigenetic clock, and 60 days cannot show effects on aging itself.
Death from any cause, in cohorts
Linked to 17% to 22% lower death from any cause per daily serving of nuts in two cohort meta-analyses, with similar results for tree nuts and peanuts.
Compared with people eating 28 g a day less [6]; people eating one serving a day less, and the lowest intake group [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Per 28 g a day more, death from any cause was lower (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84), as were total cancer (RR 0.85) and deaths from respiratory disease, diabetes and infections [6]. Per serving a day, death from any cause was lower (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.91), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.91) for the highest against the lowest intake [7].
- Population
- 15 cohort estimates for death from any cause [6]. 18 prospective studies with 48,818 deaths [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Observational, open to confounding and reverse causation. Heterogeneity was high (I² 66%) [6].
Long-term mortality
Linked to 10% lower all-cause mortality among people whose diets scored highest for a Paleolithic pattern in cohort studies.
Compared with people whose diets scored lowest for a Paleolithic pattern, in cohorts [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 12 prospective cohorts, the highest adherers had lower all-cause mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.94), cancer mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.97) and coronary heart disease incidence (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.00) [3].
- Population
- Adults in 12 prospective cohort studies, observational [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Observational studies scoring how closely ordinary diets matched a Paleolithic pattern, not trials of people following the named diet. They cannot separate the diet from other differences between people.
Cancer
Limited evidence: one English cohort found cancer within a year in 11.6% of men and 6.2% of women aged 40 and older with a count above 400.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among people aged 40 and older with a platelet count above 400 thousand/µL, 11.6% of men (95% CI 11.0 to 12.3) and 6.2% of women (5.9 to 6.5) were diagnosed with cancer within 1 year, against 4.1% of men and 2.2% of women with a count in the usual range. With a second raised count within 6 months the figures were 18.1% and 10.1%. Lung and colorectal cancer were the cancers most often found [9]. In a Danish cohort a count of 100 to 200 went with more later cancer than 201 to 250 (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.57) [7].
- Population
- 40,000 primary care patients aged 40 and older with a count above 400 and 10,000 matched patients without, from English records for 2000 to 2013 [9]. 21,252 Danish adults [7].
- Sources
- [9], [7]
- Caveats
- Observational, from primary care records of people who had a blood count taken, with cancer counted over the following year only [9]. The Danish finding points the other way, toward low-normal counts [7].
Death from any cause
One cohort found higher prolactin went with more deaths, 17% more per standard deviation in men and 22% more in women.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Each standard deviation higher prolactin had a hazard ratio for death from any cause of 1.17 in men (95% CI 1.07 to 1.29) and 1.22 in women (1.03 to 1.46). The top third against the bottom third had 1.75 in men (1.32 to 2.32) and 1.66 in women (1.08 to 2.56). Cardiovascular deaths followed the same pattern in both sexes [8].
- Population
- 3,929 adults aged 20 to 81 in a German population study, 419 deaths over a median 10.1 years [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort, described by its authors as the first report of this association [8].
Energy
One uncontrolled study in fibromyalgia found 7 of 8 health survey scores improved on a mostly raw vegetarian diet, all but bodily pain. No study in healthy people.
Compared with before the diet, in the same people [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people with fibromyalgia on a mostly raw vegetarian diet of fruits, salads, carrot juice, tubers, grains, nuts, seeds and a barley grass product, the fibromyalgia impact score fell 46%, from 51 to 28. Seven of the 8 SF-36 health survey subscales improved significantly, bodily pain being the exception [7].
- Population
- 30 adults with fibromyalgia enrolled, 20 analyzed at 2 or 4 months [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- No control group, and a third of participants were not in the main analysis. The abstract does not give the change on the SF-36 vitality scale on its own. People with fibromyalgia, not healthy people seeking more energy [7].
Death from any cause
Linked to lower all-cause mortality in Finnish men, with a hazard ratio of about 0.85 for 3 to 7 sessions a week against 2 or fewer.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 20.7 years, 49.1% of men using a sauna once a week died, against 37.8% at 2 to 3 times and 30.8% at 4 to 7 times, with a significant trend after adjustment (P for trend 0.005 or less). Session length was not associated with all-cause mortality [9]. Comparing 3 to 7 sessions a week with 2 or fewer, adjusted hazard ratios for death from any cause were 0.84 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.97) in 2,277 men [11] and 0.86 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.97) in 2,575 men followed for 27.8 years [12].
- Population
- Finnish men aged 42 to 61 at baseline in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease study [9][11][12].
- Sources
- [9], [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Observational, and all three analyses use the same cohort of Finnish men. No randomized trial has measured mortality.
Death from any cause
Limited evidence: one US cohort linked serum selenium to fewer deaths up to about 130 µg/L and more above 150, and one trial of 300 µg a day raised deaths.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In US adults, the top third of serum selenium (130.39 µg/L or above) had fewer deaths from any cause than the bottom third (below 117.31 µg/L), with a hazard ratio of 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.96), and fewer cancer deaths (0.69, 0.53 to 0.90). The relation was not a straight line: deaths fell as selenium rose to 130 µg/L and rose modestly above 150 µg/L. Cardiovascular deaths showed no association [11]. In a Danish trial in older adults with relatively low selenium, 300 µg a day for 5 years was followed by more deaths from any cause over the full 15 years of follow-up than placebo (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.46). Doses of 100 and 200 µg a day showed no significant difference [7].
- Population
- 13,887 adults in the US national survey of 1988 to 1994, followed for up to 12 years [11]. 491 volunteers aged 60 to 74 in Denmark, with 158 deaths [7].
- Sources
- [11], [7]
- Caveats
- The cohort is observational, and mean serum selenium in it was 125.6 µg/L [11]. The trial was not designed to study deaths, its sample was small, and the excess appeared only at the highest dose [7].
Growth in children with growth hormone deficiency
Limited evidence: growth rate roughly doubled in children with growth hormone deficiency in an uncontrolled study, with smaller gains than daily growth hormone. Adult height was not determined.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Mean height velocity rose from 4.1 cm a year at baseline to 8.0 cm a year at 6 months and 7.2 cm a year at 12 months, and 74% were rated as good responders at 6 months [1]. In a randomized comparison with growth hormone, growth rate was lowest on the lower sermorelin dose and similar between the higher dose and growth hormone. Height relative to bone age rose only on growth hormone [2]. A review reports smaller rises in height velocity with sermorelin than with daily somatropin, and states that effects on final adult height were not determined [3].
- Population
- 110 previously untreated prepubertal children with growth hormone deficiency, 86 in the efficacy analysis, 1 year [1]; 43 prepubertal children aged 4.3 to 18.9 with deficiency of hypothalamic origin, 6 months [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The largest study had no control group [1]. The randomized comparison was small [2].
Death in hospital after a rise during the stay
Limited evidence: in one hospital cohort a rise in creatinine of 0.5 mg/dL or more during the stay went with 6.5 times the odds of death.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among adults with two or more creatinine results during a hospital stay, a rise of 0.5 mg/dL or more occurred in 1,237 (13%) and a rise of 2.0 mg/dL or more in 105 (1%). A rise of 0.5 mg/dL or more was associated with 6.5 times the odds of death (95% CI 5.0 to 8.5), 3.5 more days in hospital and nearly 7,500 dollars in added cost, after adjustment for age, sex, diagnosis, severity of illness and chronic kidney disease [7].
- Population
- 9,210 adults with two or more creatinine measurements, among 19,982 admitted to one urban academic medical center [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Observational, at one center, in people ill enough to be admitted. It concerns a change during a hospital stay, not a single outpatient result [7].
Death in intensive care at low levels
Limited evidence: one cohort of 11,291 intensive care patients linked a baseline creatinine of 0.6 mg/dL or below to about 2.6 times the odds of death.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After adjustment for predicted mortality, age, sex, surgery and body mass index, the odds ratio for death in hospital was 2.59 (95% CI 1.82 to 3.61) for a baseline creatinine of 0.6 mg/dL or below and 1.28 (1.03 to 1.60) for 0.6 to 0.8 mg/dL. Median baseline creatinine was 1.1 mg/dL. The authors treat low creatinine as a marker of low muscle mass [9].
- Population
- 11,291 adults admitted to three intensive care units at two hospitals from 2003 to 2006, 1,185 deaths in hospital [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Retrospective, in critically ill patients, so it does not describe a low result in a person who is well. Muscle mass was not measured [9].
Death from any cause
Limited evidence: one Taiwanese cohort linked both low and high serum iron to more deaths over 19 years, 27% and 37% more than the middle group.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The relation between serum iron and death from any cause, and from specific causes, was J-shaped. Against the group classed as normal, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.27 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.31) in the low group and 1.37 (1.30 to 1.44) in the high group. People whose serum iron was outside the normal group at two visits had a hazard ratio of 1.49 (1.36 to 1.63) against people inside it at both [6].
- Population
- Adults in the Taiwan MJ health screening cohort, recruited 1997 to 2007 and followed to 2022, 33,005 deaths over a median of 19.0 years [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort. The abstract does not give the number of participants or the serum iron levels that defined the low and high groups. Illness that changes serum iron before death cannot be ruled out [6].
Redesigning shift schedules
Limited evidence: switching to faster or forward-rotating shifts, or letting workers choose their shifts, improved health or work-life balance in small, mostly uncontrolled studies.
Compared with the previous schedule, in experimental and quasi-experimental studies with or without a control group [1]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 26 studies, no type of schedule change was consistently harmful. Three types had beneficial effects on health, work-life balance or both: switching from slow to fast rotation, changing from backward to forward rotation (day, then evening, then night), and self-scheduling of shifts [1].
- Population
- Shift workers in 26 experimental and quasi-experimental studies from any country [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The review gave a narrative synthesis with no pooled numbers, and the authors raised concerns about how far the evidence generalizes [1].
Nerve pain after chemotherapy
One trial found duloxetine lowered pain from chemotherapy nerve damage by 0.73 points more than placebo on a 10-point scale over 5 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Average pain fell by 1.06 points on duloxetine and 0.34 on placebo, a difference of 0.73 (95% CI 0.26 to 1.20) on a scale of 0 to 10. Any decrease in pain was reported by 59% on duloxetine and 38% on placebo [22].
- Population
- 231 adults with painful neuropathy after taxane or oxaliplatin chemotherapy, in a crossover trial of 30 mg for one week then 60 mg for four weeks [22].
- Sources
- [22]
- Caveats
- One trial of 5 weeks per period. Not an approved use.
Sodium at the upper end of the range in midlife
One US cohort linked midlife sodium above 142 mEq/L to 39% more chronic disease, and above 144 mEq/L to 21% more early deaths, over 25 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Sodium above 142 mmol/L in middle age was associated with a higher risk of developing chronic diseases (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.63) and with higher odds of a biological age above chronological age (OR 1.50, 1.14 to 1.96). Sodium above 144 mmol/L was associated with a higher risk of premature death (HR 1.21, 1.02 to 1.45) [14].
- Population
- 15,752 adults aged 45 to 66 at enrollment in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, followed for 25 years [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- One cohort, observational. The authors used serum sodium as a proxy for hydration habits and state that intervention studies are needed to confirm a link between hydration and aging. These values sit inside both laboratory reference ranges at the top of this page [14].
Death from any cause
One cohort of Swedish women linked active sun habits to fewer deaths from heart disease and other non-cancer causes, and 0.6 to 2.1 years longer life.
Compared with women who avoided sun exposure [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Women with active sun exposure habits had lower risk of cardiovascular and non-cancer, non-cardiovascular death than women who avoided the sun. Life expectancy of avoiders was 0.6 to 2.1 years shorter than in the highest sun exposure group. Because they lived longer, cancer made up a larger share of deaths among sun-seeking women [13].
- Population
- 29,518 Swedish women aged 25 to 64 at the start, followed 20 years [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort. Women who seek the sun may be healthier, more active and better off, and ill women may avoid going out, which is reverse causation.
Weekly time in nature and wellbeing
One national survey linked at least 120 minutes a week in nature to higher odds of good health and wellbeing, with no further gain beyond 200 to 300 minutes.
Compared with people with no nature contact in the past week [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against no nature contact in the past week, 120 to 179 minutes was linked to higher odds of good health (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.92) and high wellbeing (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.40). Benefits peaked at 200 to 300 minutes a week. It did not matter whether the time came in one visit or several [11].
- Population
- 19,806 adults in England, weighted to be nationally representative [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Cross-sectional and self-reported. Healthier, happier people may simply visit nature more, which is reverse causation.
Stress hormones and mood
One small 4-week trial found lower tension, anger and saliva cortisol, and higher saliva testosterone, in moderately stressed adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 63 moderately stressed adults (32 men, 31 women), 4 weeks of a hot-water root extract lowered tension (11%), anger (12%) and confusion (15%) scores, lowered salivary cortisol exposure by 16%, and raised salivary testosterone by 37% compared with placebo [6].
- Population
- 63 adults [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One 4-week trial. The first author's listed affiliation is SupplementWatch. Cortisol and testosterone were measured in saliva.
Cancer
Limited evidence: one cohort linked higher transferrin saturation to more cancer and cancer deaths in women, with no such link for ferritin.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In women, higher transferrin saturation had a hazard ratio of 1.68 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.38) for a new cancer other than skin cancer, 1.90 (1.02 to 3.56) for breast cancer and 2.48 (1.28 to 4.82) for death from cancer. In men, higher serum iron went with fewer new cancers (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.99). Ferritin was not associated with cancer risk or cancer death [12].
- Population
- 1,597 men and 1,795 women aged 25 to 79 in the Busselton Health Survey, without cancer at the start and with ferritin of 20 ng/mL or above, followed from 1994 or 1995 to 2010 [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort, with opposite directions in women and men. The abstract does not state which saturation levels were compared, and the authors call the basis for the sex difference unclear [12].
Death from any cause
One Korean cohort of 375,163 adults found more deaths at both ends of the uric acid range than in the middle.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In Korean adults having health checkups, the association with death from any cause was U-shaped. Against the sex-specific reference category, adjusted hazard ratios in the lowest categories (below 3.5 mg/dL for men, below 2.5 mg/dL for women) were 1.58 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.10) and 1.80 (1.10 to 2.93). In the highest categories (9.5 mg/dL or above for men, 8.5 mg/dL or above for women) they were 2.39 (1.57 to 3.66) and 3.77 (1.17 to 12.17). Cardiovascular and cancer deaths followed the same pattern [21].
- Population
- 375,163 South Korean men and women, with 2,020 deaths over about 2.06 million person-years [21].
- Sources
- [21]
- Caveats
- Observational, one cohort, with few deaths in the extreme categories and wide intervals for women. Illness that lowers or raises uric acid before death cannot be ruled out as the explanation [21].
Cancer
Linked to about 15% lower total cancer incidence in a small number of cohort studies. Colorectal cancer did not differ significantly in one cohort.
Compared with omnivores, in cohort studies [5]; nonvegetarians in the same Seventh-day Adventist cohort in North America [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In cohort studies, vegan diets were linked to lower total cancer incidence (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.95) [5]. In the Adventist cohort, colorectal cancer in vegans did not differ significantly from nonvegetarians (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.19) [6].
- Population
- Adults in prospective cohorts [5]; 77,659 Seventh-day Adventists followed a mean 7.3 years [6]. Observational.
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Observational. The review notes the vegan result came from a limited number of studies [5].
Death from any cause in adults
Limited evidence: one cohort of 29,104 Finnish men who smoked linked higher serum retinol to 17% fewer deaths, with the lowest risk near 60 to 70 µg/dL.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 30 years, men in the highest fifth of serum retinol had fewer deaths from any cause than men in the lowest fifth (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.87), and fewer deaths from cardiovascular and respiratory disease. The relation was not a straight line. Deaths were more frequent below 483 µg/L (48.3 µg/dL), and risk was lowest at about 600 to 700 µg/L (60 to 70 µg/dL). The median at the start was 576 µg/L (57.6 µg/dL). The authors cite a US survey analysis of 16,008 people in which the middle fifths, and not the top fifth, had 18% fewer deaths than the lowest fifth [3].
- Population
- 29,104 male smokers in Finland aged 50 to 69 at entry to a cancer prevention trial, with 23,797 deaths [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Observational, in men who smoked, almost none of whom had retinol in the range WHO calls low. Illness and inflammation lower serum retinol [9], so a low level may mark disease already present. No trial that raised serum retinol in adults and counted deaths was located.
Death from any cause at high levels
Limited evidence: one Dutch cohort linked higher plasma B12 to more deaths over 8 years, 25% more per standard deviation.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Mortality was 33.8 deaths per 10,000 person-years in the quartile with the lowest plasma B12 and 65.7 per 10,000 person-years in the highest. After adjustment for age, sex, kidney function and other clinical and laboratory variables, the hazard ratio per 1 standard deviation higher B12 was 1.25 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.47). The median concentration was 394 pg/mL (interquartile range 310 to 497) [9].
- Population
- 5,571 adults in Groningen, the Netherlands, mean age 53.5, not using B12 supplements, 226 deaths over a median 8.2 years [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Observational and a post hoc analysis. The authors state that the mechanisms are not established, so a high level may mark an illness and need not be its cause [9].
Cancer diagnosis after a high result
Limited evidence: one Danish registry study linked B12 above the reference range to 3 to 6 times the expected cancer diagnoses in the following year.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among people referred for a B12 measurement, 6% had levels above the upper reference limit of the Danish laboratories (601 pmol/L or more, about 815 pg/mL). In the first year of follow-up the standardized incidence ratio for cancer was 3.44 (95% CI 3.14 to 3.76) at 601 to 800 pmol/L and 6.27 (95% CI 5.70 to 6.88) above 800 pmol/L (about 1,084 pg/mL). Risks were particularly raised for blood cancers and cancers related to smoking and alcohol [10].
- Population
- 333,667 people in Northern Denmark without known cancer and not receiving B12 treatment, tested from 1998 to 2009 [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Observational, in people whose clinician had ordered the test. The excess was mostly within the first year, which fits a cancer already present raising the level. The pg/mL figures are converted here from the study's pmol/L [10][3].
Fibromyalgia
Small trials found less pain and better quality of life scores in people with fibromyalgia after a course of sessions, compared with rest or usual care.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 60 patients, pain fell 3.0 points on a visual analogue scale with cryotherapy against 0.3 with rest, and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire scores fell 32.1 against 0.4 (all p < 0.001) [13]. In 24 patients, 10 sessions over 8 days improved health-related quality of life against usual care, lasting at least a month [14].
- Population
- 60 patients in an open crossover trial, with only the first period analyzed [13]. 24 patients, 11 on cryotherapy and 13 controls [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Open trials with no sham, in a condition where symptoms respond strongly to expectation. A carry-over effect led one trial to discard its second period [13].
Reported risks135
Dry mouth, drowsiness and other side effects
Shown to raise side effects such as dry mouth, drowsiness and dizziness, with any adverse event in 55% to 78% on amitriptyline against 36% to 47% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In depression trials, amitriptyline caused more anticholinergic side effects, fast heart rate, dizziness, nervousness, sedation, tremor, indigestion and sexual dysfunction than placebo, and more people left for side effects (OR 4.15) [1]. In nerve pain trials, at least one adverse event occurred in 55% against 36% [3], and in fibromyalgia trials in 78% against 47% [6]. In the children's migraine trial, fatigue occurred in 30% against 14% and dry mouth in 25% against 12% [8].
- Population
- 3,509 adults in depression trials [1]; 1,342 adults with nerve pain [3]; 649 adults with fibromyalgia [6]; 361 children and adolescents [8].
- Sources
- [1], [3], [6], [8]
- Caveats
- The pain trials used lower doses than depression trials and were small.
Symptoms after stopping
Shown to cause discontinuation symptoms in about 31% of people stopping an antidepressant against 17% stopping placebo, with venlafaxine and desvenlafaxine among the most frequent.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- At least one discontinuation symptom occurred in 31% (95% CI 27 to 35) after stopping an antidepressant and 17% (95% CI 14 to 21) after stopping placebo, a difference of 8 percentage points within randomized trials. Severe symptoms occurred in 2.8% vs 0.6%. Desvenlafaxine and venlafaxine were among the drugs with higher frequency and higher severity [29]. A second meta-analysis found about one more symptom in the first week after stopping (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.39), with dizziness the most frequent (OR 5.52, risk difference 6.24%) [30]. A systematic review of 61 SNRI reports found withdrawal symptoms after every SNRI, a prevalence that varied between reports and appeared higher with venlafaxine, onset within a few days, and a course of a few weeks, including after gradual tapering [31]. The venlafaxine label states that symptom frequency rose with dose and with length of treatment [10]. The desvenlafaxine label reports postmarketing cases that were protracted and severe [9].
- Population
- 21,002 patients in 79 studies [29]; 17,828 participants in 50 studies [30]; 22 randomized trials, 16 other studies and 23 case reports of SNRIs [31].
- Sources
- [29], [30], [31], [10], [9]
- Caveats
- The pooled rates combine SNRIs with other antidepressants, and heterogeneity was substantial [29]. The SNRI review gives no pooled rate [31].
Symptoms after stopping
Shown to cause discontinuation symptoms in about 31% of people stopping an antidepressant against 17% stopping placebo, with severe symptoms in about 3%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- At least one discontinuation symptom occurred in 31% (95% CI 27 to 35) after stopping an antidepressant and 17% (95% CI 14 to 21) after stopping placebo. Within randomized trials the difference was 8 percentage points (95% CI 4 to 12). Severe symptoms occurred in 2.8% vs 0.6%. Escitalopram was among the drugs with higher frequency, and paroxetine among those with higher severity [37]. A second meta-analysis found about one more symptom on a discontinuation symptom checklist in the first week after stopping (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.39), with higher odds of dizziness (OR 5.52, risk difference 6.24%), nausea (OR 3.16) and nervousness (OR 3.15) than after stopping placebo [38]. The label lists nausea, sweating, dizziness, electric shock sensations, irritability, anxiety, insomnia and tinnitus among the symptoms [24].
- Population
- 21,002 patients in 44 RCTs and 35 observational studies, 16,532 stopping an antidepressant [37]; 17,828 participants in 50 studies followed 1 day to 52 weeks [38].
- Sources
- [37], [38], [24], [39]
- Caveats
- Estimates vary widely. An earlier review that included surveys reported a weighted average of 56% (range 27% to 86%), with 46% of those affected choosing the most severe rating, and symptoms lasting weeks to months in some studies [39]. Heterogeneity was substantial [37]. Both meta-analyses pooled SSRIs with other antidepressants.
Tiredness and stuffy nose
Shown to raise tiredness and nasal congestion in label trials, with stuffy or runny nose in 13% on tamsulosin 0.4 mg against 8% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Rhinitis was 13.1% on tamsulosin 0.4 mg, 17.9% on 0.8 mg and 8.3% on placebo, and asthenia 7.8% against 5.5% [4]. Fatigue was 8.0% on doxazosin against 1.7% on placebo in BPH trials [7]. Asthenia was 7.4% on terazosin against 3.3% [19]. Nasal congestion was 2.1% on silodosin against 0.2% [5].
- Population
- BPH label trials [4][7][19][5].
- Sources
- [4], [7], [19], [5]
- Caveats
- Label adverse reaction tables list events more frequent than placebo, so they are not a full list.
FDA boxed warning: dependence and withdrawal
FDA states continued use may lead to physical dependence, and abrupt stopping may bring life-threatening withdrawal. One study found withdrawal reactions in 58% to 100% of long-term users.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The boxed warning states that the risks of dependence and withdrawal rise with longer treatment and higher daily dose, and that abrupt discontinuation or rapid dose reduction may precipitate acute withdrawal reactions, including seizures. The label also describes a protracted withdrawal syndrome lasting weeks to more than 12 months [18]. When long-term users were switched blind to placebo, 58% to 100% were judged to have a withdrawal reaction, depending on the criteria used, peaking at 2 days for short half-life drugs and 4 to 7 days for long half-life drugs [19]. FDA wrote that physical dependence can occur after several days to weeks of steady use, even as prescribed. In its series of 104 reports, about 80% described withdrawal, with symptoms lasting from weeks to years [22].
- Population
- 57 people who had taken a benzodiazepine daily for more than a year, 47 switched to placebo [19]; 104 reports to FDA from 1968 to 2019 [22].
- Sources
- [18], [19], [22]
- Caveats
- The discontinuation study stopped the drug abruptly in people who had used it for over a year, so the band above applies to that setting. FDA described epidemiologic data on dependence and withdrawal as scarce, and no systematic review giving a pooled withdrawal rate was located. Withdrawal symptoms can be hard to tell from the return of the original condition [22].
Fatigue
Shown to raise reported fatigue slightly, by 18 per 1,000 people a year, or one extra report for every 57 people treated.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 15 placebo-controlled trials, beta-blockers were associated with 18 more reports of fatigue per 1,000 people a year (95% CI 5 to 30), one extra report for every 57 people treated for a year. The excess was larger with early-generation beta-blockers [28]. In US heart failure trials of carvedilol, fatigue was reported by 24% against 22% on placebo [25].
- Population
- More than 35,000 people in 15 trials in heart attack, heart failure or hypertension, each with at least 100 people and 6 months of follow-up [28]; 765 people on carvedilol and 437 on placebo [25].
- Sources
- [28], [25]
- Caveats
- Fatigue was frequent on placebo too, so most reports on the drug were not caused by it.
Flu-like reaction after an infusion
Shown to cause fever, aches and flu-like symptoms within 3 days of a zoledronic acid infusion, with fever in 18% against 5% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In the main osteoporosis trial, fever was reported in 17.9% on zoledronic acid and 4.6% on placebo, muscle pain in 11.7% against 3.7%, and influenza-like illness in 8.8% against 2.7%. Most symptoms began within 3 days and resolved within 3 days. When acetaminophen was given, fever fell to 7%, and symptoms became less frequent with later doses [13]. In Paget's disease, zoledronate raised transient fever or fatigue against placebo (RR 2.57, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.44) [12].
- Population
- 7,714 women in the main osteoporosis trial [13]; 176 people in one Paget's trial [12].
- Sources
- [13], [12]
- Caveats
- Applies to the infusion. Oral bisphosphonates were not linked to this reaction in these sources.
Dry mouth, nausea and other common side effects
Shown to raise dry mouth, nausea, dizziness, tremor, sweating and ringing in the ears against placebo, with dry mouth in 17% to 24% against 7%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In depression trials at 300 and 400 mg a day against placebo: dry mouth 17% and 24% vs 7%, nausea 13% and 18% vs 8%, dizziness 7% and 11% vs 5%, tremor 6% and 3% vs 1%, sweating 6% and 5% vs 2%, tinnitus 6% and 6% vs 2%, anxiety 5% and 6% vs 3% and agitation 3% and 9% vs 2% [15]. In smoking cessation trials, more people dropped out for adverse events on bupropion than on placebo (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.65) [4]. In veterans with depression, anxiety was reported by 22.5% to 24.3% in the bupropion groups against 16.6% on added aripiprazole [10].
- Population
- 490 adults on sustained-release bupropion and 385 on placebo [15]; 12,346 participants in 25 smoking cessation studies [4]; 1,522 veterans [10].
- Sources
- [15], [4], [10]
- Caveats
- Short-term trials. Several effects were more frequent at 400 mg than at 300 mg a day [15].
Drowsiness and fatigue
Shown to raise drowsiness, in 38% on guanfacine against 11% on placebo and 31% to 38% on extended-release clonidine against 4%, with about 4 treated for one extra case.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In ADHD trials, somnolence occurred in 38% on 0.2 mg and 31% on 0.4 mg extended-release clonidine against 4% on placebo, and fatigue in 16% and 13% against 1% [6]. On guanfacine, somnolence occurred in 38% across doses against 11%, rising from 28% at 1 mg to 51% at 4 mg, and fatigue in 14% against 3% [7]. A meta-analysis found numbers needed to harm of 4 for somnolence, 10 for fatigue and 17 for sedation [5]. The clonidine tablet label reports drowsiness in about 33 of 100 people [13].
- Population
- 230 children and adolescents in a fixed-dose clonidine trial [6]; 513 on guanfacine and 149 on placebo [7]; 2,276 young people in 12 trials [5].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [5], [13]
- Caveats
- Somnolence led to stopping in 11% at the highest guanfacine dose [7].
Hot flashes
Shown to raise hot flashes: 22% on Oriahnn against 9% on placebo, 11% on Myfembree against 7%, and 73% on leuprolide without add-back against 18%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Hot flushes affected 22% on Oriahnn and 9% on placebo [6], vasomotor symptoms 10.6% on Myfembree and 6.6% on placebo [2], and hot flashes or sweats 73% on leuprolide and 18% on placebo in fibroid trials [10]. GnRH agonists before surgery raised adverse events overall against placebo or no pretreatment (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.77 to 4.36) and hot flushes against other medicines (OR 2.83) [11].
- Population
- 395 women on Oriahnn and 196 on placebo [6]; 254 on Myfembree and 256 on placebo [2]; 166 on leuprolide and 163 on placebo [10]; 41 trials before surgery [11].
- Sources
- [6], [2], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Leuprolide rates come from trials without add-back hormones [10].
Side effects in bipolar trials
Shown to raise nausea, insomnia, fatigue and back pain slightly in bipolar trials, with nausea in 14% against 11% on placebo. Overall adverse effects matched placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In two 18-month bipolar trials, nausea occurred in 14% on lamotrigine and 11% on placebo, insomnia 10% and 6%, sleepiness 9% and 7%, back pain 8% and 6%, fatigue 8% and 5%, and dry mouth 6% and 4%. 13% stopped lamotrigine for an adverse reaction, against 16% on placebo and 23% on lithium [4]. A Cochrane review found the share with any adverse effect similar to placebo over 6 to 12 months (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.23) [1].
- Population
- 227 adults on lamotrigine, 190 on placebo and 166 on lithium [4]; 756 participants in 4 studies [1].
- Sources
- [4], [1]
- Caveats
- During the open-label dose escalation, before randomization, headache (25%), rash (11%) and dizziness (10%) were more frequent [4].
Nausea and other common side effects
Shown to raise nausea, 11% on modafinil against 3% on placebo, along with smaller rises in appetite loss, dry mouth and diarrhea. 8% stopped for side effects.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In pooled trials, nausea occurred in 11% vs 3% on placebo, anorexia in 4% vs 1%, dry mouth in 4% vs 2%, diarrhea in 6% vs 5% and dizziness in 5% vs 4%. 8% stopped modafinil for an adverse reaction against 3% on placebo [3]. On armodafinil, nausea occurred in 7% vs 3% and dizziness in 5% vs 2%, and 7% stopped against 4% [6].
- Population
- 934 on modafinil and 567 on placebo [3]; 645 on armodafinil and 445 on placebo [6].
- Sources
- [3], [6]
- Caveats
- Short trials in people with sleep disorders.
123 more
Fatigue, constipation and diarrhea
Shown to raise fatigue and constipation against placebo in chemotherapy trials, with fatigue in 13% against 2% and constipation in 9% against under 1%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In chemotherapy trials, malaise or fatigue occurred in 13% on ondansetron and 2% on placebo, constipation in 9% and under 1%, and diarrhea in 6% and 4%. Extrapyramidal reactions occurred in under 1% [3]. The label states repeated dosing slowed colonic transit in healthy people [3].
- Population
- 242 adults on ondansetron and 262 on placebo [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Patients were also receiving chemotherapy, which causes some of these effects.
Side effects during a short course
Shown to raise side effects during short courses, with at least one adverse event in 49.2% on 15 days of prednisone against 23.9% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In the sciatica trial, at least one adverse event by 3 weeks was reported by 49.2% on prednisone and 23.9% on placebo [9]. In COPD flare-ups, adverse events were more frequent on systemic corticosteroids (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.59 to 3.43), one extra for every 6 people treated [3].
- Population
- 269 adults with sciatica [9]; 1,787 people with COPD flare-ups in 16 studies [3].
- Sources
- [9], [3]
- Caveats
- Trials of single doses for sore throat and back pain found no clear rise in adverse events, with imprecise estimates [11][10].
Nausea and other common side effects
Shown to raise nausea, dry mouth, sweating, constipation and dizziness against placebo, with nausea in 23% to 30% against 8% to 12% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In pooled duloxetine trials: nausea 23% vs 8% on placebo, dry mouth 13% vs 5%, constipation 9% vs 4%, dizziness 9% vs 5%, fatigue 9% vs 5%, decreased appetite 7% vs 2% and sweating 6% vs 1% [18]. In pooled venlafaxine extended release trials: nausea 30.0% vs 11.8%, dizziness 15.8% vs 9.5%, dry mouth 14.8% vs 5.3%, sweating 11.4% vs 2.9%, loss of appetite 9.8% vs 2.6% and constipation 9.3% vs 3.4% [10]. On desvenlafaxine, nausea rose with dose, from 22% at 50 mg to 41% at 400 mg, against 10% on placebo [9]. In pain trials, 16% stopped duloxetine for adverse effects [13].
- Population
- 8,100 adults on duloxetine and 5,655 on placebo [18]; 3,558 adults on venlafaxine extended release and 2,197 on placebo in studies up to 12 weeks [10]; adults in short-term desvenlafaxine depression studies [9]; 6,407 participants in 18 pain trials [13].
- Sources
- [18], [10], [9], [13]
- Caveats
- Short-term trials. Several of these effects were dose-dependent [18][9].
Nausea, diarrhea and other common side effects
Shown to raise nausea, diarrhea, tremor and sweating against placebo, with nausea in 26% on sertraline against 12% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In pooled sertraline trials: nausea 26% vs 12% on placebo, diarrhea or loose stools 20% vs 10%, dry mouth 14% vs 9%, fatigue 12% vs 8%, dizziness 12% vs 8%, tremor 9% vs 2%, decreased appetite 7% vs 2% and sweating 7% vs 3%. 12% stopped sertraline for an adverse reaction against 4% on placebo [24]. In fluoxetine depression trials, nausea occurred in 21% vs 9% and anxiety in 12% vs 7% [26]. A meta-analysis of 131 SSRI trials found more serious and non-serious adverse events on SSRIs than placebo [2].
- Population
- 3,066 adults on sertraline and 2,293 on placebo [24]; 1,728 adults on fluoxetine and 975 on placebo in depression trials [26]; 27,422 adults in 131 trials [2].
- Sources
- [24], [26], [2]
- Caveats
- Rates come from trials of 8 to 12 weeks and differ by drug and by condition treated [24].
Sleepiness and fatigue
Shown to raise sleepiness and fatigue, about twice as often as placebo in add-on epilepsy trials, with fatigue in 15% against 11% in migraine trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In migraine trials at 100 mg, fatigue occurred in 15% against 11% on placebo and sleepiness in 7% against 5%, both rising with dose [3]. In add-on epilepsy trials, the risk ratios against placebo were 2.44 for sleepiness, 2.08 for fatigue, 1.52 for dizziness and 2.29 for unsteadiness [6].
- Population
- Adults in migraine trials [3]; 1,650 participants in 12 epilepsy trials [6].
- Sources
- [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The label states sleepiness and fatigue were the most frequent reactions in add-on epilepsy trials [3].
Common side effects
Shown to raise headache, sinus symptoms, back pain and muscle pain slightly over placebo. Headache affected 50% on the drug and 47% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In the two label trials, headache affected 50.4% on 3,900 mg a day and 46.8% on placebo, nasal and sinus symptoms 25.4% and 17.3%, back pain 20.7% and 15.1%, abdominal pain 19.8% and 18.0%, musculoskeletal pain 11.2% and 2.9%, joint pain 6.9% and 5.0%, muscle cramps 6.5% and 5.8%, migraine 6.0% and 5.8%, anemia 5.6% and 3.6%, and fatigue 5.2% and 4.3%. In a 27-cycle open-label study, 12.4% withdrew for adverse reactions [4]. Overall adverse events did not differ from placebo in one trial (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.18) and were less common than on progestogens (RR 0.66) [1]. Nausea or vomiting did not differ from placebo (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.8, 4 trials) [2].
- Population
- 232 women on 3,900 mg a day and 139 on placebo; 781 women in the long-term study [4]; women in the trials pooled in [1] and [2].
- Sources
- [4], [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Most events were mild to moderate [5]. Rates near placebo mean most of these were not caused by the drug.
Dry mouth, blurred vision and other common side effects
Shown to raise dry mouth, blurred vision, swelling and fatigue against placebo, with dry mouth in 34% of outpatients against 20% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In outpatient depression trials: dry mouth 34% vs 20% on placebo, blurred vision 15% vs 4%, skin condition or edema 7% vs 1%, nasal congestion 6% vs 3% and diarrhea 5% vs 1%. In inpatient trials: dry mouth 15% vs 8%, fatigue 11% vs 4%, nausea or vomiting 10% vs 1% and incoordination 5% vs 0 [12]. In insomnia trials, decreased appetite was more frequent than in control groups (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.14 to 6.92) [7].
- Population
- 157 outpatients and 142 inpatients on trazodone, 158 and 95 on placebo [12]; 466 participants in 11 insomnia RCTs [7].
- Sources
- [12], [7]
- Caveats
- Small, older trials at depression doses. Rates at the lower doses used for sleep may differ.
Common side effects
After the emergency dose, 18% reported headache and 12% nausea, as often as on levonorgestrel. In fibroid trials, headache and breast tenderness did not differ from placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In the 13-week placebo-controlled trial, headache and breast tenderness were the most common adverse events and did not occur significantly more often than on placebo [1]. In a US fibroid trial, hypertension, raised creatine phosphokinase and hot flushes each affected 5% or more in a ulipristal group [2]. After a single 30 mg dose, headache affected 18%, abdominal pain 12%, nausea 12%, period pain 9%, fatigue 6% and dizziness 5% [9]. Headache rates matched levonorgestrel (19.3% and 18.9%) [8].
- Population
- 242 women [1] and 157 women [2] in fibroid trials; women in the emergency contraception trials [8][9].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [9], [8]
- Caveats
- The emergency contraception rates come from trials without a placebo arm [9].
Fishy body odor
Small trials found fishy body odor in 36% of children on choline against 8% on placebo, in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 3 trials, 36% of children on choline reported fishy body odor, against 8% on placebo. Other adverse effects were similar between groups [6].
- Population
- 104 children aged 2.5 to 5.9 with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, treated for 9 months [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Pooled data from one research group's trials [6].
Frail older adults switched from warfarin
One trial found more bleeding after frail older adults were switched from a vitamin K antagonist to a DOAC, 101 of 662 against 62 of 661.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Among frail older adults with atrial fibrillation, a major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding complication occurred in 101 of 662 people switched to a DOAC against 62 of 661 who continued a vitamin K antagonist (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.32). Thromboembolic events did not differ (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.61). The trial was stopped for futility [27].
- Population
- 1,323 frail patients with atrial fibrillation, mean age 83, already managed on a vitamin K antagonist [27].
- Sources
- [27]
- Caveats
- One trial in people already stable on a vitamin K antagonist. It does not describe people starting an anticoagulant for the first time.
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 1,323 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Temporary worsening of symptoms
One trial found initial worsening of rhinitis in 30% of people on homeopathy against 7% on placebo. Homeopaths call this an aggravation.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 51 people with perennial allergic rhinitis, initial aggravations of symptoms occurred in 7 (30%) given homeopathy and 2 (7%) given placebo (P = 0.04) [12]. Five of 41 trials (12%) reported homeopathic aggravations, 98% of them graded mild [21]. A review of anxiety studies found "remedy reactions" of temporary worsening and the return of old symptoms [16].
- Population
- 51 adults [12]. 41 trials [21]. Anxiety studies [16].
- Sources
- [12], [21], [16]
- Caveats
- One small trial gives the only rate per person.
Death in extremely preterm infants
One trial, stopped early, found more deaths in extremely preterm infants given myo-inositol, 18% against 11% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The trial stopped early. Death or severe retinopathy of prematurity occurred in 29% on myo-inositol and 21% on placebo (adjusted RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.83). Death before 55 weeks' postmenstrual age occurred in 18% and 11% (adjusted RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.43) [14].
- Population
- 638 infants born before 28 weeks' gestation at 18 US neonatal centers [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- One trial, stopped early. It used IV and enteral doses in newborns, not adult supplements [14].
Ovarian enlargement, hot flushes and other common side effects
The clomiphene label lists ovarian enlargement in 13.6% and hot flushes in 10.4% of women in its trials. Against clomiphene, letrozole had fewer hot flushes but more fatigue and dizziness.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 8,029 patients in the clomiphene trials, reported adverse events were ovarian enlargement 13.6%, hot flushes 10.4%, abdominal or pelvic discomfort and bloating 5.5%, nausea and vomiting 2.2%, breast discomfort 2.1%, headache 1.3% and abnormal uterine bleeding 1.3% [1]. In PPCOS II, hot flushes were more common on clomiphene, fatigue and dizziness were more common on letrozole, and other adverse events were similar [5].
- Population
- 8,029 women in uncontrolled label trials [1]. 750 women with PCOS [5].
- Sources
- [1], [5]
- Caveats
- The label trials had no placebo group, and the label notes 498 patients may have been counted twice [1]. The PPCOS II abstract does not give the rates [5].
Weight gain, cataracts and other effects of long-term use
Linked to weight gain in 70% of long-term users in one survey, with cataracts reported by 15% and fractures by 12%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Among long-term users surveyed by mail, more than 90% reported at least one adverse event and 55% found at least one very bothersome. Weight gain was reported by 70%, cataracts by 15% and fractures by 12%, and every effect rose with cumulative dose [29]. The label lists posterior subcapsular cataracts, glaucoma, fluid retention, muscle weakness and loss of muscle mass among adverse reactions [20].
- Population
- 2,446 long-term glucocorticoid users, mean dose 16 mg a day of prednisone equivalent, 38% of those mailed the survey [29].
- Sources
- [29], [20]
- Caveats
- Self-reported, with no comparison group, and 62% did not respond.
Continued vaping after quitting smoking
One trial found 80% of people who quit with e-cigarettes were still vaping a year later, against 9% still using nicotine replacement.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Among people abstinent from smoking at 1 year, 80% (63 of 79) in the e-cigarette group were still using their e-cigarette at 52 weeks, against 9% (4 of 44) in the nicotine replacement group still using it [4].
- Population
- 886 adults at UK stop-smoking services [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- One trial. What years of continued vaping do to health is not known from these trials [1].
Major bleeding on aspirin
Shown to raise major bleeding by about 43% against no aspirin, to 4.1% against 3.2% over 7.4 years in one trial and 3.8% against 2.8% in another.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 13 primary prevention trials, aspirin raised major bleeding (HR 1.43, 95% credible interval 1.30 to 1.56, absolute increase 0.47%, number needed to harm 210) [11]. Major gastrointestinal and extracranial bleeds occurred at 0.10% a year on aspirin against 0.07% on control [2]. Major bleeding occurred in 4.1% on aspirin against 3.2% on placebo over a mean 7.4 years in adults with diabetes [14], and major hemorrhage in 3.8% against 2.8% over a median 4.7 years in adults aged 70 or over [16]. The prescription aspirin label states that aspirin increases the risk of bleeding [23].
- Population
- 164,225 participants in 13 trials [11]; 15,480 adults with diabetes [14]; 19,114 adults aged 70 or over [16].
- Sources
- [11], [2], [14], [16], [23]
- Caveats
- The main risk factors for coronary disease were also risk factors for bleeding [2].
Major bleeding
Shown to cause major bleeding in about 5% of people with atrial fibrillation over the trials, a rate similar to or below warfarin's 5.9%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In patient-level data from four atrial fibrillation trials, major bleeding occurred in 5.05% on a standard-dose DOAC against 5.94% on warfarin (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.01) and in 4.34% on a lower dose (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88) [2]. The yearly rate was 2.13% on apixaban against 3.09% on warfarin [5], 3.11% on dabigatran 150 mg against 3.36% [3] and 2.75% on high-dose edoxaban against 3.43% [6]. On rivaroxaban, major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred at 14.9% a year against 14.5% [4]. In venous clot treatment, major bleeding was lower on a DOAC than on a vitamin K antagonist (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.83) [7].
- Population
- 71,683 participants in four atrial fibrillation trials [2]; 27,023 patients in six venous thromboembolism trials [7].
- Sources
- [2], [5], [3], [4], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- The comparator is warfarin, not placebo. The reduction against warfarin was larger at trial centers where warfarin control was poorer [1].
FDA boxed warning: major or fatal bleeding
FDA states that warfarin can cause major or fatal bleeding. Major bleeding occurred in about 6% of people with atrial fibrillation over the pivotal trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The boxed warning states that warfarin can cause major or fatal bleeding, and the label lists an INR above 4.0, age 65 or over, highly variable INRs, earlier gastrointestinal bleeding, kidney impairment and certain other drugs among risk factors. It states that bleeding is more likely in the first month [11]. In four atrial fibrillation trials, major bleeding occurred in 5.94% on warfarin against 5.05% on a standard-dose DOAC [5], and at a yearly rate of 3.43% on warfarin in the edoxaban trial [14]. Against control in older atrial fibrillation trials, the absolute increase in major extracranial hemorrhage was 0.3% a year or less [1]. After a heart attack, major nonfatal bleeding occurred at 0.62% per treatment-year on warfarin against 0.17% on aspirin [12]. Among people treated for venous clots, 13.4% of major bleeds were fatal (95% CI 9.4 to 17.4) [17].
- Population
- 29,272 people on warfarin in four trials [5]; 28,044 participants in 29 trials [1]; 3,630 patients after heart attack [12]; 33 studies with 4,374 patient-years of treatment [17].
- Sources
- [11], [5], [14], [1], [12], [17]
- Caveats
- The band above is the share with major bleeding over the atrial fibrillation trials, whose comparator was a DOAC. Placebo-controlled trials were older and smaller.
Bleeding, bruising and pain at the needle site
Shown in about 9% of patients over a course of acupuncture, most often bleeding, bruising or pain at the needle site.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across prospective studies, at least one adverse event occurred in 9.31% of patients (95% CI 5.10% to 14.62%) over a course of treatment, and half were bleeding, pain or flare at the needle site [21]. Among 229,230 patients, 8.6% reported at least one adverse effect and 2.2% one needing treatment. Bleeding or hematoma affected 6.1%, pain 1.7% and dizziness, fainting or other vegetative symptoms 0.7% [22]. In sham-controlled migraine trials, the share reporting adverse effects did not differ between acupuncture and sham (OR 1.15) [6].
- Population
- 21 prospective studies [21]. 229,230 German patients receiving an average of 10 treatments from physicians [22].
- Sources
- [21], [22], [6]
- Caveats
- Definitions varied widely between studies. The reviewers note that some needle-site reactions are considered part of treatment [21].
Bleeding when clopidogrel and aspirin are taken together
Shown to raise major bleeding when clopidogrel was added to aspirin, 3.7% against 2.7% in acute coronary syndromes, and about 60% more with courses beyond a year.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- With clopidogrel added to aspirin, major bleeding occurred in 3.7% against 2.7% on aspirin alone, life-threatening bleeding in 2.2% against 1.8% and minor bleeding in 5.1% against 2.4% [4][22]. After a minor stroke, major hemorrhage occurred in 0.9% against 0.4% [9]. Continuing a thienopyridine with aspirin beyond a year after a stent raised moderate or severe bleeding to 2.5% against 1.6% [6], and across 10 trials extended treatment raised major bleeding (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.09) and death from any cause (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.66) [7]. The label states that giving antiplatelet agents together increases bleeding through an additive effect [22].
- Population
- 12,562 patients with acute coronary syndromes [4]; 4,881 patients after minor stroke or TIA [9]; 9,961 patients after a stent [6]; 32,287 patients in 10 trials [7].
- Sources
- [4], [22], [9], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- In two short-course trials, major bleeding did not rise (0.58% against 0.55%, and 0.3% against 0.3%) [5][8].
Bleeding with warfarin, DOACs and other anticoagulants
Shown to raise major bleeding when aspirin was combined with low-dose rivaroxaban, 3.1% against 1.9% on aspirin alone. Labels warn of the same with warfarin.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In stable vascular disease, major bleeding occurred in 3.1% on rivaroxaban plus aspirin against 1.9% on aspirin alone (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.05) [29]. Among people on anticoagulants for venous clots, clinically relevant bleeding occurred at 36.6 per 100 patient-years during aspirin use against 16.9 without (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.11) [30]. The clopidogrel label states that warfarin taken with clopidogrel increases the risk of bleeding through independent effects on clotting [22], and the aspirin label lists anticoagulants as increasing the risk of bleeding [23].
- Population
- 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease [29]; 8,246 patients treated for venous clots [30].
- Sources
- [29], [30], [22], [23]
- Caveats
- The second analysis is observational within trials and gives rates per patient-years [30].
Cancer
Mixed results: one pooled analysis found 8% more new cancers on ARBs, and two larger analyses of randomized trials found no rise.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- A 2010 meta-analysis of 5 trials found new cancer in 7.2% on ARBs and 6.0% of controls (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15). Telmisartan was the drug in 85.7% of the ARB patients [30]. An analysis of 15 trials found cancer in 6.16% on ARBs and 6.31% of controls (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.04), overall and for each ARB [31]. A network meta-analysis of 70 trials found no difference in cancer between ARBs and placebo (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.09). An ACE inhibitor plus an ARB showed a higher rate in one model (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.28) and not in another [32].
- Population
- 61,590 people with new-cancer data in 5 trials [30]; 138,769 people in 15 trials followed 23 to 60 months [31]; 324,168 participants in 70 trials [32].
- Sources
- [30], [31], [32]
- Caveats
- Follow-up was 5 years or less, and cancer was not the planned outcome of most trials.
FDA boxed warning: death in older people with dementia-related psychosis
FDA states older people with dementia-related psychosis on antipsychotics had about 1.6 to 1.7 times the death rate of placebo, 4.5% against 2.6% over 10 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Both labels carry this boxed warning and state the drug is not approved for dementia-related psychosis. In 17 placebo-controlled trials, largely of atypical antipsychotics and typically 10 weeks long, death occurred in about 4.5% on a drug and about 2.6% on placebo [3][10]. A meta-analysis of 15 trials found death in 3.5% (118) on atypical antipsychotics and 2.3% (40) on placebo (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.23), with no evidence of different risks between individual drugs [15]. A later review put the figure at one extra death per 87 older people treated [12].
- Population
- Older people with dementia in 17 placebo-controlled trials pooled by FDA [3]; 15 trials of aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone [15].
- Sources
- [3], [10], [15], [12]
- Caveats
- A class finding. The label states that most deaths appeared to be cardiovascular or infectious in nature, with varied causes.
Bleeding when taken with NSAIDs, aspirin or other blood thinners
Linked to about 2.4 times the major bleeding when an NSAID was taken alongside an anticoagulant, and to 3.1% against 1.9% when rivaroxaban was added to aspirin.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Among people treated for venous clots with rivaroxaban or enoxaparin and a vitamin K antagonist, major bleeding occurred at 6.5 per 100 patient-years during NSAID use against 2.0 without (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.51 to 3.75), and clinically relevant bleeding at 37.5 against 16.6 (HR 1.77). With aspirin, clinically relevant bleeding occurred at 36.6 against 16.9 per 100 patient-years (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.11). The increases were similar for both anticoagulant regimens [24]. Adding rivaroxaban to aspirin raised major bleeding to 3.1% against 1.9% on aspirin alone [13]. The labels state that aspirin, other antiplatelet drugs, other anticoagulants and chronic NSAID use increase the risk of bleeding [22][23].
- Population
- 8,246 patients in two rivaroxaban venous thromboembolism trials [24]; 27,395 participants with stable vascular disease [13].
- Sources
- [24], [13], [22], [23]
- Caveats
- The NSAID analysis is observational within trials and gives rates per patient-years. The band above is the share with major bleeding on rivaroxaban plus aspirin [13].
Ezetimibe: common side effects
Shown to slightly raise colds, diarrhea, joint pain and tiredness in label trials, with upper respiratory infection in 4.3% against 2.5% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Upper respiratory tract infection was 4.3% on ezetimibe and 2.5% on placebo, diarrhea 4.1% and 3.7%, joint pain 3.0% and 2.2%, sinusitis 2.8% and 2.2%, and fatigue 2.4% and 1.5% [2].
- Population
- 2,396 people on ezetimibe and 1,159 on placebo in placebo-controlled trials [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- Small differences from placebo.
Adrenal suppression
Linked to adrenal insufficiency in about 6.8% of people with asthma using only inhaled steroids, more at high doses and after more than a year.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Adrenal insufficiency was found in 6.8% (95% CI 3.8 to 12.0) of people with asthma on inhaled steroids only. In asthma, rates ranged from 2.4% at low doses to 21.5% at high doses, and from 1.4% after under 28 days to 27.4% after more than a year [22]. The label warns of hypercorticism and adrenal suppression, particularly at higher doses [15].
- Population
- 3,753 participants in 74 articles across all steroid routes [22].
- Sources
- [22], [15]
- Caveats
- Studies used different tests and cut-offs, and most rates come from tested patients rather than random samples [22].
Fatigue
Shown to raise fatigue, 6 to 9% against 4% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- A network meta-analysis found fatigue risk raised with orforglipron (risk ratio 3.4), about 100 more cases per 1,000 people over one year [3]. In the label pool, fatigue occurred in 6 to 9% on orforglipron and 4% on placebo [6].
- Population
- 262 trials [3]; label pool as above [6].
- Sources
- [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The meta-analysis estimate for orforglipron rests on a small number of trials.
Death from any cause in healthy older adults on aspirin
One trial found more deaths on aspirin than placebo in healthy adults aged 70 or over, driven by cancer deaths in 3.1% against 2.3%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Over a median 4.7 years, death from any cause occurred at 12.7 events per 1,000 person-years on aspirin against 11.1 on placebo (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.29). Cancer-related death occurred in 3.1% against 2.3% (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.56) [21]. In moderate-risk adults followed a median 60 months, deaths were 2.55% on aspirin and 2.57% on placebo [13].
- Population
- 19,114 healthy adults aged 70 or over [21]; 12,546 moderate-risk adults [13].
- Sources
- [21], [13]
- Caveats
- The authors called the result unexpected in the context of earlier studies and urged caution in interpreting it [21]. A second trial found no difference in deaths [13].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 19,114 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Cancer and death after folic acid with B12
Limited evidence: in two Norwegian trials, folic acid with B12 raised cancer from 8.4% to 10.0% and deaths from 13.8% to 16.1% in people with heart disease.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Cancer was diagnosed in 10.0% given folic acid with B12 and 8.4% not given it (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.41). Death from any cause was 16.1% against 13.8% (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33), driven mainly by lung cancer. B6 alone was not linked to any significant effect [8].
- Population
- 6,837 people with ischemic heart disease in two Norwegian trials, median 39 months of treatment and 38 months of follow-up [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Norway did not fortify food with folic acid. Across 15 trials, mortality did not change [1].
Deaths in a dementia trial
One trial found 7 deaths on mirtazapine against 1 on placebo by week 16 in people with dementia, a difference of marginal statistical significance.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In a trial of mirtazapine for agitation in dementia, 7 of 102 people on mirtazapine and 1 of 102 on placebo had died by week 16. A post hoc analysis put the difference at marginal statistical significance (P = 0.065) [12]. In an earlier trial in depression with dementia, five people died in each group by week 39 [13].
- Population
- 204 people with dementia and agitation [12]; people with dementia and depression in a three-arm trial [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- A small number of deaths in one trial, analyzed post hoc and not confirmed in the earlier trial.
Cancer with folic acid plus B12
Limited evidence: two Norwegian trials found more cancer with folic acid plus B12 in people with heart disease, while a larger analysis found no significant effect.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In two Norwegian trials, cancer was diagnosed in 10.0% of people given folic acid plus B12 and 8.4% of those not given it (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.41). Cancer death was 4.0% against 2.9% (HR 1.38) and death from any cause 16.1% against 13.8% (HR 1.18). Lung cancer drove most of the difference. B6 alone showed no effect [14].
- Population
- 6,837 people with ischemic heart disease in Norway, which did not fortify food with folic acid, treated a median 39 months and followed a further 38 months [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- A combined analysis of two trials, with half its follow-up after treatment ended. Sources disagree. A 2013 meta-analysis of individual data from 13 folic acid trials (49,621 people) found no significant effect on overall cancer during treatment (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.13) [16].
Death from any cause
Mixed results: a meta-analysis linked benzodiazepine use to 1.6 times the death rate, while a large matched cohort found no rise at six months.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- Across 10 cohort studies, benzodiazepine users had higher mortality than non-users (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.49) [32]. In a matched cohort of people starting a benzodiazepine, deaths over six months occurred at 9.3 per 1,000 person-years against 9.4 in people not starting one (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.04), with increases of 4% to 9% in some longer and subgroup analyses [33].
- Population
- 2,350,093 patients in 25 studies of anxiolytics and hypnotics [32]; matched US adults starting or not starting a benzodiazepine, with about 5,000 deaths in each group [33].
- Sources
- [32], [33]
- Caveats
- Observational, with significant heterogeneity in the meta-analysis [32]. The cohort authors judged that leftover confounding likely explains part of any small increase [33].
Serious adverse events, including collapsed lung
Shown in about 1 per 10,000 patients. Two collapsed lungs were recorded among 229,230 patients.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- Serious adverse events occurred in 1.01 per 10,000 patients (95% CI 0.23 to 2.33) and 7.98 per million treatments [21]. Among 229,230 patients, 2 had a pneumothorax, one treated in hospital, and the longest-lasting side effect was a nerve injury of the leg lasting 180 days [22]. An overview of 17 systematic reviews grouped reported serious events into organ or tissue injuries, with a median of 4 deaths per review, and infections [23].
- Population
- 21 prospective studies [21]. 229,230 patients [22]. 17 systematic reviews of adverse events [23].
- Sources
- [21], [22], [23]
- Caveats
- The overview rated the quality of the reviews as mediocre, and case counts in reviews give no rate [23].
Serious adverse events, including collapsed lung
Prospective surveys recorded major adverse events after about 1 in 1,000 treatments or fewer. Case reports describe collapsed lungs after needling over the chest wall.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- Twenty major adverse events occurred in 20,494 treatments, about 1 per 1,024 [17]. No significant events occurred in 7,629 treatments, an estimated upper risk of 0.04% or less [18]. Across 59 studies, major events per treatment ranged from 0% to 0.43%, while 0.98% to 39.14% of professionals reported one over their whole practice [19]. In one case, a 24-year-old woman needled between the shoulder blades developed a moderate pneumothorax that needed a chest tube and a night in hospital, and recovered within a month [20].
- Population
- 20,494 treatments [17]. 7,629 treatments [18]. 59 studies including 25 patients in case reports and 2,380 professionals in surveys [19]. One woman [20].
- Sources
- [17], [18], [19], [20]
- Caveats
- Major events in the largest survey included prolonged symptom aggravation and excessive bleeding as well as pneumothorax [17]. Case reports give no rate.
Cancer
Linked to higher risk of cancers of the mouth, throat, esophagus, bowel, larynx, liver and breast, rising with dose. Breast cancer rose 5% at up to one drink daily.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against non-drinkers and occasional drinkers, heavy drinkers had higher risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer (RR 5.13), esophageal squamous cell cancer (4.95), laryngeal (2.65), liver (2.07), breast (1.61) and colorectal cancer (1.44), with clear dose-response for most [15]. Against non-drinkers, light drinking of up to 1 drink a day was linked to oropharyngeal cancer (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29), esophageal squamous cell cancer (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.56) and female breast cancer (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.08), and not to bowel, liver or larynx cancer [13].
- Population
- 572 studies with 486,538 cancer cases [15]. 222 articles with about 92,000 light drinkers and 60,000 non-drinkers with cancer [13].
- Sources
- [15], [13]
- Caveats
- Observational, though consistent across hundreds of studies and with clear dose-response. Lymphomas were less common in drinkers [15].
Swelling, joint pain and carpal tunnel syndrome
Shown to raise swelling, joint pain and carpal tunnel symptoms, with swelling about 6 times as likely in adults with deficiency.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Healthy older adults on growth hormone were more likely to have soft tissue swelling, joint pain, carpal tunnel syndrome and breast enlargement in men [1]. Young athletes had more swelling and fatigue [2]. In adults with deficiency, the relative risk of swelling was 6.07 (95% CI 4.34 to 8.48) and of joint stiffness 4.17 (95% CI 1.4 to 12.38) [6]. In orthopedic studies, the odds of swelling of the limbs were 3.03, of carpal tunnel symptoms 3.85 and of joint pain 2.94 on growth hormone [5].
- Population
- As in [1], [2], [6] and [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [6], [5]
- Caveats
- [1] and [2] report these as more frequent without pooled rates in the abstract.
Long naps linked to death from any cause
Linked to about 15% to 28% more deaths in nappers in four meta-analyses of cohorts, mainly with naps of an hour or more, rising in a straight line.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Naps of 60 minutes or more were linked to more deaths (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.45), with a linear rise as nap time grew [6]. Nappers had higher death rates than non-nappers (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.31) [9]. Nappers had a 15% higher risk (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.24), significant for naps over 60 minutes (RR 1.15) and not for shorter naps (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.32) [10]. Nappers had higher mortality (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.38), as did those napping an hour or more (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.33) [7].
- Population
- 151,588 participants in 11 cohorts [6]. 130,068 participants with 19,059 deaths in 12 studies [9]. 98,163 participants in 7 studies [10]. 371,306 participants in 21 studies [7].
- Sources
- [6], [9], [10], [7]
- Caveats
- Observational. Long naps often follow poor night sleep, sleep apnea, depression or early illness, so reverse causation and confounding may explain much of the link. The reviews draw on overlapping cohorts.
Headache, flushing and other common effects
Shown to raise side effects such as headache and flushing, about 1.7 times placebo for sildenafil, with tadalafil 10 mg lowest among starting doses.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- PDE5 inhibitors raised the risk of any adverse event against placebo, for example RR 1.72 (95% CI 1.53 to 1.93) for sildenafil [1]. Among starting doses, sildenafil 50 mg had the highest overall adverse event rate and tadalafil 10 mg the lowest [2]. In pulmonary hypertension, flushing, dyspepsia and diarrhea were reported [6]. At altitude, sildenafil worsened existing headache in 2 of 14 participants [3]. The Cialis label lists headache, dyspepsia, back pain, muscle pain, nasal congestion and flushing as the most common reactions [7].
- Population
- Trial participants in [1], [2], [3] and [6]; label [7].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [6], [3], [7]
- Caveats
- Most trial data are short term [1].
Death from any cause, processed meat
Linked to 23% higher death at the highest processed meat intake than the lowest, in pooled cohorts. A later review rated the link very small and low certainty.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against the lowest intake, the highest was linked to higher death from any cause for processed meat (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.28) and total red meat (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.35) [12]. Each 3 fewer servings of processed meat a week was linked to a very small decrease in death from any cause [9].
- Population
- 9 prospective studies [12]. 55 cohorts [9].
- Sources
- [12], [9]
- Caveats
- Observational. The 2019 review cites inadequate adjustment for known confounders and recall bias in diet reports [9].
Death from any cause in people who smoke
Linked to about two to three times the death rate of never smokers in large cohorts, and to more than a decade of lost life.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Current smokers aged 25 to 79 had about three times the death rate of never smokers (HR 3.0 in women, 2.8 in men), and lost more than 10 years of life expectancy [1]. Continuing smokers born 1900 to 1930 died about 10 years younger than lifelong non-smokers [2]. Women still smoking 3 years into follow-up had a death rate ratio of 2.97 (95% CI 2.88 to 3.07), and those smoking under 10 a day had 1.98 [3]. Current smokers had hazard ratios of 2.8 (women) and 2.7 (men) [4]. In people 60 and older, current smoking had an RM of 1.83 (95% CI 1.65 to 2.03) [5].
- Population
- 202,248 US adults [1]. 34,439 British doctors [2]. 1.2 million UK women [3]. 1.48 million adults in 4 countries [4]. 17 cohorts of people 60 and older [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Observational, with adjustment for age, education, alcohol and weight in the largest cohorts [1][4]. The rates are relative, so they give no single share of smokers who die of smoking.
Slower growth in children
Shown to slow growth in children, with about 2 cm less height and 2.7 kg less weight over 3 years of daily methylphenidate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The methylphenidate label reports that children aged 7 to 13 treated 7 days a week for 14 to 36 months grew on average about 2 cm less in height and 2.7 kg less in weight over 3 years, with no growth rebound during that period [21]. In the long-term follow-up of that trial, people with consistent or inconsistent stimulant use through childhood were 2.55 cm shorter as adults than those with negligible use [29]. In a 4-week trial in adolescents, mean weight change was -1.1 lb on 10 mg and -2.8 lb on 20 mg of extended-release mixed amphetamine salts [17].
- Population
- Children aged 7 to 13 followed for up to 3 years [21]; the same trial's participants followed to about age 25, with 289 classmates as a comparison group [29]; adolescents in a 4-week trial [17].
- Sources
- [21], [29], [17]
- Caveats
- The sources report average differences, not the share of children affected. The adult height comparison is between self-selected patterns of use, not randomized groups [29].
Pure and highly concentrated caffeine powders
FDA states pure or highly concentrated caffeine products have been linked to at least two US deaths, and seizures can occur with rapid intake of about 1,200 mg.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The FDA states pure or highly concentrated caffeine products have been linked to at least two US deaths and treats some as adulterated [21]. It estimates seizures can occur with rapid intake of about 1,200 mg, less than half a teaspoon of pure caffeine [12]. A Maryland medical examiner series found 8 caffeine deaths from 1999 to 2009, average postmortem concentration 140.4 mg/L, none from caffeine-containing foods [22].
- Population
- US consumers [12][21]; 8 adult deaths [22].
- Sources
- [12], [21], [22]
- Caveats
- Case series and regulatory statements, not trials. Two of the 8 deaths were suicides and the others involved large amounts of tablets or other medications [22].
Cancer death
Linked to 20% higher cancer death at the highest egg intake than the lowest, in pooled cohorts rated low to moderate in certainty.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The highest against the lowest intake was linked to higher cancer death (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.39), and each extra egg a week to 4% higher cancer death [10].
- Population
- 13 cohorts within a review of 2,216,720 participants [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Observational. One review.
Fenofibrate: serious adverse events
Mixed results: a Cochrane review found more serious adverse events on fenofibrate than placebo, while a pooled analysis of fibrate trials found no significant rise in drug-related serious events.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Fenofibrate increased severe adverse effects (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.27, high certainty), which were rare [14]. Across fibrate trials, serious drug-related adverse events were not significantly raised (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.61) [9].
- Population
- 15,313 people with type 2 diabetes in 2 trials [14]; 17,413 people in fibrate trials [9].
- Sources
- [14], [9]
- Caveats
- [9] counts only events judged drug related and pools several fibrates.
Death in critical illness
Shown to about double in-hospital deaths at high doses in two intensive care trials. A later review of 23 trials found no mortality change.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In two parallel trials of adults in intensive care, in-hospital mortality was 39% on growth hormone against 20% on placebo in Finland, and 44% against 18% in the multinational trial. Relative risk of death was 1.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.9) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.5) [8]. A 2025 meta-analysis of 23 RCTs of growth hormone, nandrolone and oxandrolone in intensive care found mortality unaffected, with longer intensive care and hospital stays. Growth hormone improved nitrogen balance (SMD 1.4, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.32) [9]. The label lists acute critical illness as a contraindication [7].
- Population
- 532 adults after cardiac or abdominal surgery, trauma or respiratory failure, in intensive care for 5 to 7 days, given a mean 0.10 mg per kg per day [8]; critically ill adults in 23 RCTs [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [7]
- Caveats
- High doses in very ill patients. It does not describe healthy adults. The meta-analysis reported substantial heterogeneity and a concerning risk of bias, and the two large trials and the pooled result disagree on mortality [9].
Slower growth in breastfed infants
Shown to slow weight and head growth slightly in healthy breastfed infants, while lowering anemia at 6 months.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 8 trials (685 healthy exclusively breastfed infants), iron raised hemoglobin and lowered iron deficiency anemia at 6 months (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84), with no difference at 12 months. Weight gain (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.01) and head circumference gain (MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.09) were smaller on iron. Mental development scores did not differ [14].
- Population
- Healthy, exclusively breastfed infants [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- The authors describe the evidence as limited, and the abstract does not state units for the growth differences [14].
Long-term mortality
Linked to 20% to 31% higher all-cause mortality in cohort studies, higher when carbohydrate was replaced with animal foods and lower when replaced with plant foods.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 4 cohorts (272,216 people), those with high low-carbohydrate scores had higher all-cause mortality (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.59). Cardiovascular death (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.24) and cardiovascular disease (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.24) were not significantly raised [11]. Across cohorts with 432,179 participants, under 40% of energy from carbohydrate was linked to higher mortality than moderate intake (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.32), as was over 70% (HR 1.23). Replacing carbohydrate with animal fat or protein was linked to higher mortality (HR 1.18), and with plant sources to lower mortality (HR 0.82) [12].
- Population
- Prospective cohorts of adults, observational [11][12]; 15,428 US adults aged 45 to 64 followed for a median of 25 years [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Observational studies of habitual intake from questionnaires, not trials of a prescribed diet, so they cannot separate the diet from other differences between people [11][12].
Ingestions by children
Linked to a 530% rise in reported child ingestions in the US from 2012 to 2021, mostly in children 5 and under, with two deaths.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- From 2012 to 2021, 260,435 pediatric melatonin ingestions were reported to US poison centers, and annual ingestions rose 530%. Melatonin went from 0.6% to 4.9% of all pediatric ingestions reported. Hospitalizations and serious outcomes rose, mostly unintentional ingestions in children 5 and under. Five children required mechanical ventilation and two died [17]. A 2026 systematic review of 12 observational studies from US, Nordic, Australian and Portuguese registries and poison data documented rising prescribing, extended use and overdoses in children aged 0 to 6, especially in the past decade [11].
- Population
- US National Poison Data System, ages 19 and under [17]; registry and poisoning studies in young children [11].
- Sources
- [17], [11]
- Caveats
- Poison center reports, not a measure of toxicity per dose.
Overall balance of events by age
Estrogen plus progestin added 12 major events per 10,000 women a year at 50 to 59 and 38 at 70 to 79. Estrogen alone had 19 fewer and 51 more.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- On the WHI global index, estrogen plus progestin gave 12 excess events per 10,000 women a year at ages 50 to 59 and 38 at ages 70 to 79. Estrogen alone gave 19 fewer events at ages 50 to 59 and 51 more at ages 70 to 79 [5].
- Population
- 27,347 women in both WHI trials [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- The global index weights heart disease, breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism, colorectal and endometrial cancer, hip fracture and death equally.
Adrenal suppression
Shown to suppress the adrenal glands, with adrenal insufficiency in 1.4% of asthma patients after under 28 days of use and 27.4% after more than a year.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 74 studies of corticosteroids by any route, the share with adrenal insufficiency after use ranged by dose from 2.4% (95% CI 0.6 to 9.3) at low doses to 21.5% (95% CI 12.0 to 35.5) at high doses. In asthma patients it ranged by duration from 1.4% under 28 days to 27.4% beyond a year [23]. The prednisone label states that corticosteroids can suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, that insufficiency may follow too rapid withdrawal, and that it may persist for up to 12 months after stopping [20].
- Population
- 3,753 participants in 74 studies [23].
- Sources
- [23], [20]
- Caveats
- The review pooled inhaled, nasal, injected and oral routes, and the abstract gives no single pooled figure for oral use. The band here is taken from the lower end of the reported range.
Higher mortality in kidney transplant recipients
Shown to raise death about 43% in kidney transplant recipients against other regimens, at transplant doses with other immunosuppressants.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Sirolimus was associated with an increased risk of death against control regimens (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.71) [6]. In 4 RCTs of recipients with prior skin squamous cell carcinoma, mortality and graft rejection did not differ, while stopping because of adverse events was more common on sirolimus (RR 8.60, 95% CI 1.95 to 37.93) [7].
- Population
- 5,876 kidney transplant recipients in 21 RCTs [6]; 393 recipients in 4 RCTs [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Recipients took sirolimus alongside other immunosuppressants, at transplant doses. [7] rated certainty for adverse events low.
Evening chronotype and cancer
Mixed results: one meta-analysis linked evening chronotype to 18% higher odds of cancer, and a systematic review of 22 studies found no consistent link for late timing.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Evening types had higher odds of cancer (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.30) [6]. A review of 22 studies of chronotype, social jet lag, sleep midpoint and weekend catch-up sleep found no consistent evidence linking late timing to cancer [17].
- Population
- 377,797 participants in 39 studies [6]. 22 studies, 95% using self-report questionnaires, mostly of site-specific cancers [17].
- Sources
- [6], [17]
- Caveats
- Observational. Measures of timing varied widely [17].
Irregular sleep and death from any cause
Mixed results: the least regular sleepers had 20% to 88% higher death rates in several cohorts, but a meta-analysis found day-to-day rhythm stability not linked to death.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against the least regular fifth, the more regular four fifths had 20% to 48% lower death from any cause, 16% to 39% lower cancer death and 22% to 57% lower cardiometabolic death, and regularity predicted death more strongly than sleep duration [10]. Five low-bias cohorts showed 20% to 88% higher mortality in the least regular sleepers [18]. In a meta-analysis of rest and activity rhythms, interdaily stability was not linked to any outcome, while more fragmented rhythms (HR 1.05) and lower amplitude (HR 1.46) were linked to death [11].
- Population
- 60,977 UK Biobank participants, mean age 62.8, followed about 6.3 years with 1,859 deaths [10]. 59 studies [18]. 109,365 participants in 7 studies [11].
- Sources
- [10], [18], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. Illness and frailty disrupt sleep schedules, which is reverse causation. The measures of regularity differ between these sources [18][11].
Death from any cause in smokers
Shown to raise death from any cause 8% to 17% with beta-carotene in smokers and asbestos-exposed workers. Deaths did not differ in mostly nonsmoking physicians.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In ATBC, total mortality was 8% higher on beta-carotene (95% CI 1% to 16%), mainly from lung cancer and ischemic heart disease [8]. In CARET, death from any cause was 17% higher (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.33) [5].
- Population
- 29,133 male smokers [8]; 18,314 smokers, former smokers and asbestos-exposed workers [5].
- Sources
- [5], [8]
- Caveats
- In healthy male physicians, few of them current smokers, deaths did not differ (979 against 968) [4].
Intravenous vitamin C in critical illness
Shown to raise death or organ dysfunction with intravenous vitamin C in sepsis, and deaths in severe burns. This concerns critically ill patients, not oral supplements.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In sepsis, death or persistent organ dysfunction at 28 days occurred in 44.5% on intravenous vitamin C and 38.5% on placebo (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.40). One patient had severe low blood sugar and another a serious anaphylaxis event [17]. In severe burns, 28-day mortality was 15.0% on vitamin C and 7.6% on placebo (adjusted RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.90), and the trial was stopped early for futility or harm [18]. After cardiac arrest, organ function improved 2.5 points less on 10 g a day than on placebo (95% CI 0.5 to 4.5), with more troponin release, worse kidney function and worse neurological outcomes [19]. Pooled across 14 sepsis trials, 28-day mortality was lower on vitamin C (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.93), but the difference came from single-center trials and did not appear in multicenter trials [23].
- Population
- 872 adults in intensive care with sepsis receiving vasopressors [17]; 238 adults with burns over 20% or more of the body at 24 centers [18]; 273 comatose adults after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [19]; 14 RCTs with 1,958 patients with sepsis [23].
- Sources
- [17], [18], [19], [23]
- Caveats
- Intravenous doses in critically ill patients, in three different conditions. This does not describe oral supplements in healthy people. The burn trial's primary composite did not reach significance (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.65) [18]. The meta-analysis rated its mortality evidence low quality [23].
Mild side effects
Shown in a review of trials, surveillance and reports to cause mostly mild, reversible side effects: nausea, headache, stomach upset, menstrual changes, acne, itching and rash.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across clinical trials, postmarketing surveillance, surveys and spontaneous reports, adverse events were mild and reversible, most often nausea, headache, gastrointestinal upset, menstrual disorders, acne, itching and rash. No drug interactions were reported [9]. Nausea and abdominal pain were the only side effects reported in the menstrual bleeding trials [6]. Breast pain trials reported only mild, reversible events [5].
- Population
- Trials and reports of single-herb vitex products [9]; 5 menstrual bleeding trials [6]; 25 breast pain studies [5].
- Sources
- [9], [6], [5]
- Caveats
- The safety review gives no rates, and it was published in 2005 [9].
Antibiotics and antifungals
Linked to about twice the odds of a bleeding admission within 15 days of an antibiotic in older warfarin users, and over four times with azole antifungals.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among older continuous warfarin users, exposure to any antibiotic within 15 days was associated with bleeding requiring hospitalization (adjusted OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.50). The association held for azole antifungals (4.57), cotrimoxazole (2.70), cephalosporins (2.45), penicillins (1.92), macrolides (1.86) and quinolones (1.69) [20]. A systematic overview found consistent reports of interaction with azoles, macrolides and quinolones [21]. The label reports INR changes with antibiotics and antifungals, while pharmacokinetic studies have not shown consistent effects on warfarin blood levels [11].
- Population
- A case-control study within 38,762 continuous warfarin users aged 65 or older [20]; 181 articles on 120 drugs or foods [21].
- Sources
- [20], [21], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. The infection being treated may itself affect bleeding risk.
NSAIDs
Linked to about twice the odds of stomach and gut bleeding when an NSAID was taken with warfarin, compared with warfarin alone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 11 studies, gastrointestinal bleeding was more frequent with warfarin plus an NSAID than with warfarin alone (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.53), and with warfarin plus a COX-2 inhibitor (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.46). Any bleeding was more frequent with warfarin plus an NSAID (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.12) [22]. The label lists NSAIDs, including celecoxib, ibuprofen and naproxen, among drugs that can increase the risk of bleeding [11].
- Population
- 11 studies comparing warfarin with an NSAID against warfarin alone [22].
- Sources
- [22], [11]
- Caveats
- Mostly observational studies. The abstract gives odds ratios, not the share of people who bled.
SSRI and SNRI antidepressants
Linked to about 35% more major bleeding when an SSRI was taken alongside an oral anticoagulant, in a meta-analysis of eight observational studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across eight cohort and case-control studies, major bleeding was more frequent with an SSRI plus an oral anticoagulant than with the anticoagulant alone (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.58) [24]. The label lists serotonin reuptake inhibitors, including citalopram, sertraline, fluoxetine, paroxetine, duloxetine and venlafaxine, among drugs that can increase the risk of bleeding with warfarin [11].
- Population
- 98,070 patients in eight studies [24].
- Sources
- [24], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. The pooled studies covered warfarin and DOACs together.
Fiber
Limited evidence: fiber intake fell during 5:2 in one study and rose less than on daily restriction in a trial, and a third trial found no difference from brief advice.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Carbohydrate and fiber intake fell from baseline to week 6 and were lower on fasting days (p below 0.001), giving a low-fiber diet overall [12]. Fiber rose 1.0 g per MJ a day on continuous restriction against 0.2 g on intermittent restriction (p below 0.001) [13]. Self-help 5:2 had no negative effect on fat and fiber intake against brief advice [8].
- Population
- 38 adults [12]; 98 adults [13]; 300 adults [8].
- Sources
- [8], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Estimated intake from food records.
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that serotonin syndrome may occur when amphetamines are taken with other drugs acting on serotonin. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The amphetamine label names MAOIs, SSRIs, SNRIs, triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone and St. John's wort, and states that drugs blocking the liver enzyme CYP2D6 may raise amphetamine exposure and add to the risk [17]. The lisdexamfetamine label carries the same warning [18]. The methylphenidate label lists serotonin syndrome in combination with serotonergic drugs among postmarketing reports [21].
- Population
- Labeling statements [17][18][21].
- Sources
- [17], [18], [21]
- Caveats
- A label warning with no denominator.
Weight gain
Small weight gains were seen in label trials, about 1 to 2 pounds on terazosin and 0.6 kg on doxazosin against small losses on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Men and women on terazosin gained a mean of 1.7 and 2.2 pounds against losses of 0.2 and 1.2 pounds on placebo [19]. In doxazosin hypertension trials, people gained a mean of 0.6 kg against a 0.1 kg loss on placebo [7].
- Population
- Placebo-controlled terazosin monotherapy trials [19]; about 300 hypertensive patients per group [7].
- Sources
- [19], [7]
- Caveats
- Possibly related to fluid. Neither label separates water from body tissue.
Serotonin syndrome and MAOIs
The label warns of serotonin syndrome with other serotonergic drugs and lists MAOIs as a contraindication, after hyperpyretic crises, convulsions and deaths with the combination.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Serotonin syndrome has been reported with tricyclics alone and particularly with triptans, other tricyclics, SSRIs, SNRIs, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone and St. John's Wort. Use with MAOIs for psychiatric disorders is contraindicated, as is starting amitriptyline during linezolid or intravenous methylene blue. Hyperpyretic crises, severe convulsions and deaths have occurred with tricyclics and MAOIs taken together [13].
- Population
- Reports summarized in the label [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- No rate is given.
Symptoms after stopping
The label reports nausea, headache and malaise after abrupt stopping, and irritability, restlessness and sleep disturbance during gradual reduction. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- After prolonged use, abrupt cessation may produce nausea, headache and malaise. Gradual dose reduction has been reported to produce transient irritability, restlessness and dream and sleep disturbance within two weeks. The label states these symptoms are not a sign of addiction [13].
- Population
- Labeling statement [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- No rate is given.
SSRI and SNRI antidepressants with clopidogrel
The label states that SSRI and SNRI antidepressants affect platelet activation and may increase the risk of bleeding when taken with clopidogrel. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The clopidogrel label states that because selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors affect platelet activation, taking them with clopidogrel may increase the risk of bleeding [22].
- Population
- A statement in labeling, with no study counts [22].
- Sources
- [22]
- Caveats
- The label gives no numbers.
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome
The label warns of neuroleptic malignant syndrome, a potentially fatal reaction reported with antipsychotic drugs including quetiapine. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The quetiapine label states that a potentially fatal symptom complex called neuroleptic malignant syndrome has been reported with antipsychotic drugs, and that rare cases have been reported with quetiapine [3].
- Population
- Reports summarized in labeling [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- The label says "rare" without a frequency, so no band can be set.
Serotonin syndrome
The label reports serotonin syndrome with buspirone, mostly when taken with other serotonergic drugs such as SSRIs, SNRIs or triptans. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that potentially life-threatening serotonin syndrome has been reported with serotonergic drugs including buspirone, alone but particularly with other serotonergic drugs including triptans, with MAOIs, or with antipsychotics and other dopamine antagonists. Serotonin syndrome also appears among voluntary reports since marketing [4].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports summarized in labeling [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Voluntary reports with no denominator.
Death and fractures in two Swedish cohorts
Linked in two Swedish cohorts to 15% higher death per daily glass of milk in women and 3% in men, and to more hip fractures in women.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In women, 3 or more glasses of milk a day against less than one was linked to higher death from any cause (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.80 to 2.06). Each daily glass was linked to higher death in women (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.17) and men (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04). In women, each glass was linked to hip fracture (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.13) and not to any fracture (HR 1.02). In men, fracture was not linked [17].
- Population
- 61,433 Swedish women followed a mean 20.1 years and 45,339 Swedish men followed 11.2 years [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- One pair of cohorts. The authors call for cautious interpretation because of residual confounding and reverse causation [17]. Pooled cohorts found no link between milk and death [11].
Bleeding with SSRI and SNRI antidepressants
The labels list SSRI and SNRI antidepressants among drugs that increase the risk of bleeding when taken with apixaban or rivaroxaban. They give no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The apixaban label states that drugs affecting hemostasis increase the risk of bleeding, and lists selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors alongside aspirin, other antiplatelet agents, heparin and NSAIDs [22]. The rivaroxaban label carries the same list [23].
- Population
- Statements in labeling, with no study counts [22][23].
- Sources
- [22], [23]
- Caveats
- The labels give no numbers.
Health effects in children and young people
Linked in a systematic review to smoking, alcohol and other substance use, short sleep, low academic performance, ADHD symptoms, suicide risk and dental erosion in people under 21.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 57 studies, energy drink use by children and young people was positively associated with smoking, alcohol use, binge drinking and other substance use, sensation-seeking, short sleep, poor sleep quality and low academic performance. Studies also reported higher risk of suicide, psychological distress, ADHD symptoms, depressive and panic behaviors, insulin resistance, dental caries and erosive tooth wear [13]. The American Academy of Pediatrics states that energy drinks have no place in the diet of children and adolescents [2].
- Population
- Children and young people up to age 21 in 57 studies [13].
- Sources
- [13], [2]
- Caveats
- Mostly observational, and the review calls for longitudinal studies to establish cause [13]. Young people who take more risks may also drink more energy drinks.
Emergency department visits
US emergency department visits involving energy drinks doubled from 10,068 in 2007 to 20,783 in 2011, a national surveillance report found.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Visits doubled for both men and women. In 2011, 58% of the visits involved energy drinks only and 42% involved other drugs as well. Visits rose 279% among people aged 40 or older [14].
- Population
- A probability sample of US hospitals in the Drug Abuse Warning Network [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- Counts of visits, not a rate per drinker. The report does not give the cause of each visit.
Alcohol mixed with energy drinks
Linked to more injury than alcohol alone in a systematic review, and to less sedation and more stimulation in pooled studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Studies that quantified injury risk supported an association between alcohol mixed with energy drinks and increased injury against alcohol only, with substantial variability in methods and outcomes [15]. Alcohol mixed with energy drinks reduced the likelihood of sedation effects and increased stimulatory effects [11].
- Population
- Studies comparing alcohol mixed with energy drinks with alcohol alone [15]. Clinical studies within a review of 32 [11].
- Sources
- [15], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. People who mix the two may differ in drinking habits and risk-taking [15].
Ezetimibe: drug interactions
The label reports cyclosporine raises ezetimibe and cyclosporine levels, cholestyramine lowers ezetimibe exposure, and combining it with fibrates other than fenofibrate is not advised.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Taking ezetimibe with cyclosporine raised levels of both drugs. Cholestyramine reduced total ezetimibe exposure, so the label separates their doses. Fenofibrate and ezetimibe may both raise cholesterol in bile and gallstone risk, and use with other fibrates is not advised [2].
- Population
- Pharmacokinetic studies in the label [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- Drug level studies, not outcome trials.
Severe illness reported after kombucha
Case reports: a US public health investigation of two severe illnesses, one fatal, in people drinking kombucha daily, and a report of severe liver injury.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 1995, two people in Iowa who had drunk kombucha daily for about 2 months developed unexplained severe illness, and one died. State health officials, the CDC and the FDA investigated [14]. A 2023 report describes severe acute liver injury in a previously healthy woman after drinking kombucha [15].
- Population
- Two people in Iowa [14]. One woman [15].
- Sources
- [14], [15]
- Caveats
- Case reports cannot prove cause or give a rate. The 1995 report describes the link as possible [14].
Higher mortality in critically ill patients
One trial found 28-day deaths of 32.4% against 27.2% with high-dose glutamine in ventilated ICU patients. A review of IV trials found no difference.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 1,223 ventilated ICU patients with multiorgan failure, 28-day mortality was 32.4% with glutamine against 27.2% without (adjusted OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.64, p = 0.05). In-hospital and 6-month mortality were significantly higher with glutamine [5].
- Population
- Critically ill adults in 40 ICUs, given glutamine intravenously and enterally [5]. 1,593 critically ill adults in 10 RCTs of IV glutamine [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- High doses by vein and tube in people with organ failure. This does not test oral supplement use in healthy people. A 2026 meta-analysis of 10 IV glutamine trials found overall mortality did not differ from standard care (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.13), while ICU and hospital stays were longer with glutamine [6].
Reactions to contaminated IV glutathione
Case reports: 7 clinic patients had nausea, vomiting and chills minutes after compounded IV glutathione. FDA linked this to possible high endotoxin levels.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Seven patients at an outpatient clinic received 1,400 mg of compounded IV glutathione. Within minutes they had nausea, vomiting, lightheadedness, chills, body aches and sneezing. One had low blood pressure and trouble breathing and went to hospital. FDA linked the reactions to possible high endotoxin levels in a dietary-supplement-grade powder, and in February 2019 warned compounders not to use it for injectables [11].
- Population
- 7 patients in one report, plus a second report from a different pharmacy [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- These are adverse event reports tied to specific lots, not trial data [11].
Cancer, tumor recurrence and long-term mortality
Limited evidence: long-term mortality was not raised after childhood treatment for isolated deficiency, while some cancers rose in subgroups. The label warns of neoplasms.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 24,232 people treated in childhood, all-cause mortality was not raised in those with isolated deficiency or idiopathic short stature (SMR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.3). Deaths from circulatory and blood diseases were raised in all risk groups, and mortality was not related to dose [10]. In a cancer analysis of the same cohort, there was no clear raised cancer risk in people with growth failure without other major disease. Bone and bladder cancer incidence was raised in those without previous cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma rose with longer follow-up [11]. In people with craniopharyngioma and growth hormone deficiency, a meta-analysis of 12 studies found lower tumor recurrence with growth hormone replacement (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.77) [12]. The label lists neoplasms among its warnings [7].
- Population
- 24,232 [10] and 23,984 [11] people treated in 8 European countries, more than 400,000 patient-years [10]; children and adults with craniopharyngioma in 12 studies [12].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [12], [7]
- Caveats
- Observational, compared with general population rates or untreated patients. The cohorts were treated for diagnosed conditions, not as healthy adults.
Adverse effects
The label lists headache, irritability, depression, fatigue, swelling and injection site reactions, breast growth in men and ovarian hyperstimulation in women. It gives no rates.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The Pregnyl label lists, for men and women, hypersensitivity reactions including rare anaphylaxis, irritability, restlessness, depression, headache, edema, fatigue, and bruising, pain, redness, swelling or itching at the injection site. In men, it states hCG may sporadically cause gynecomastia, that water and sodium retention is occasionally seen at high doses, and lists precocious puberty. In women, it lists ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, which can become serious, and rare thromboembolism, usually with severe hyperstimulation [8].
- Population
- People treated with hCG for approved uses, as described in labeling [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- The label does not give how often each reaction occurs or compare it with placebo [8]. It does not describe use for weight loss or alongside testosterone.
Belladonna toxicity from teething tablets
FDA states it found 99 adverse event cases consistent with belladonna toxicity, including infant deaths and seizures, possibly related to homeopathic teething products.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 2016, an FDA search of its adverse event database identified 99 cases consistent with belladonna toxicity, including reports of infant deaths and seizures, possibly related to teething products. FDA testing found belladonna alkaloids in some teething tablets far exceeding the labeled amounts [2]. In April 2017 the FDA requested a recall of all lots of Hyland's Baby Teething Tablets and Nighttime Teething Tablets, judged the varying alkaloid content "a serious health hazard", and noted that infants' ability to break down and clear belladonna alkaloids is limited [20].
- Population
- Infants given homeopathic teething tablets or gels [2][20].
- Sources
- [2], [20]
- Caveats
- Adverse event reports show a possible link, not proof that the product caused each case, and give no rate [2].
Harms in case reports, including delayed care
Case reports: 38 reports described harms in 1,159 people, including four deaths, from remedies themselves or from homeopathy replacing conventional care.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Of 38 reports, 30 described direct harms from homeopathic remedies and 8 described harm when homeopathy replaced conventional medicine. Harms ranged from mild to severe and included four deaths. Allergic reactions and poisoning were the most common, and Rhus toxicodendron was the remedy most often implicated [22]. FDA lists products for serious or life-threatening conditions as higher risk because they may lead people to delay or stop treatments shown to work [2].
- Population
- 1,159 people in 38 case reports and case series [22].
- Sources
- [22], [2]
- Caveats
- Case reports give no rate and cannot show how often harm occurs.
Interactions with ritonavir and other strong CYP3A4 inhibitors
The label states use with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors such as ritonavir, ketoconazole or clarithromycin can raise steroid levels and heart side effects. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The fluticasone-salmeterol label states that strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, including ritonavir, atazanavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, nefazodone, nelfinavir, saquinavir, ketoconazole and telithromycin, may raise systemic corticosteroid and cardiovascular adverse effects [15].
- Population
- Labeling statement drawn from pharmacokinetic data [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- No rate of harm is given.
Accidental poisoning in young children
Limited evidence: after the 1997 FDA unit-dose packaging rule, iron poisoning deaths in children under 6 fell from 29 in 10 years to 1 in 5 years.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- After the 1997 FDA unit-dose packaging rule, iron ingestion calls for children under 6 fell from 2.99 to 1.91 per 1,000 poison center calls, and iron poisoning deaths fell from 29 in the 10 years before to 1 in the 5 years after (OR 13.56, 95% CI 1.85 to 99.52) [12].
- Population
- US poison control data, children under 6 [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- A before and after comparison of national data, not a trial. It covers the 5 years after the 1997 rule and does not describe packaging rules in force today.
Bloodstream infection from contaminated infusions
Case reports: previously healthy women developed bloodstream infections with environmental bacteria after IV vitamin infusions given outside hospitals, one of them nearly fatal.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A previously healthy woman developed Rahnella aquatilis bacteremia right after an unlicensed IV vitamin infusion presumed to be contaminated [10]. A 52-year-old woman with no medical history had nausea, vomiting and diarrhea and a nearly fatal Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteremia after a naturopathic IV vitamin infusion given at home [11].
- Population
- Two women [10][11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Case reports give no rate.
Fiber
Linked to fiber intake below guideline goals in US adults on low-carbohydrate diets, a shortfall the general population also showed.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Neither men nor women on low-carbohydrate diets met fiber goals. Intake was also short for magnesium, potassium and vitamins A, E and D, vitamin C in men and folate in women. The general population showed a comparable picture [9].
- Population
- 307 US adults following a low-carbohydrate diet, from national survey data [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Cross-sectional survey data, not a trial. The shortfalls were not unique to low-carbohydrate diets [9].
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that mirtazapine can precipitate serotonin syndrome, with higher risk alongside other serotonergic drugs. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label names triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, SSRIs, SNRIs, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone, amphetamines and St. John's wort as raising the risk [7].
- Population
- Labeling statement [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- A label warning with no denominator.
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication because the combination increases the risk of serotonin syndrome. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that mirtazapine is contraindicated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors or within 14 days of stopping one. Its examples are selegiline, tranylcypromine, isocarboxazid, phenelzine, the antibiotic linezolid and intravenous methylene blue [7].
- Population
- Labeling statement [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Symptoms after stopping
The label reports dizziness, abnormal dreams, electric shock sensations, agitation, anxiety, nausea and sweating after stopping mirtazapine, particularly abruptly. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label lists dizziness, abnormal dreams, sensory disturbances including paresthesia and electric shock sensations, agitation, anxiety, fatigue, confusion, headache, tremor, nausea, vomiting and sweating after discontinuation [7]. Across antidepressants as a group, a meta-analysis found at least one discontinuation symptom in 31% of people stopping a drug and 17% stopping placebo, and severe symptoms in 2.8% against 0.6% [15].
- Population
- Reports summarized in labeling [7]; 21,002 patients in 79 studies of antidepressants [15].
- Sources
- [7], [15]
- Caveats
- The abstract of [15] names no figure for mirtazapine, so the pooled rate is context and not a mirtazapine rate. No study of misuse or dependence on mirtazapine was sourced.
Appetite, weight gain, swelling and muscle pain
One trial found more appetite, mild leg swelling and muscle pain, with weight up 2.7 kg against 0.8 kg on placebo, in older adults.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The most frequent side effects were increased appetite that subsided within a few months, and transient, mild swelling of the legs and muscle pain. Body weight rose 2.7 kg against 0.8 kg on placebo, and limb fat rose 1.1 kg against 0.24 kg [1].
- Population
- 65 healthy adults aged 60 to 81 [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- One trial.
Cancer
Mixed results: IARC found limited evidence that aspartame causes liver cancer and classed it possibly carcinogenic, while JECFA and the FDA found the evidence not convincing.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- IARC classified aspartame in Group 2B on limited evidence for cancer in humans, specifically hepatocellular carcinoma, with limited evidence in animals and for mechanism. JECFA found the evidence of a link between aspartame and cancer in humans not convincing [2]. The FDA disagrees with IARC's classification and cites shortcomings in the studies relied on [3]. In a French cohort, higher consumers of artificial sweeteners had more cancer than non-consumers (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.25), including aspartame (HR 1.15) and acesulfame potassium (HR 1.13), and breast and obesity-related cancers [13]. A review of trials and observational studies found no differences for cancer between users and non-users [8].
- Population
- 102,865 French adults followed a median 7.8 years, 3,358 cancers [13]. Evidence reviewed by IARC and JECFA [2].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [13], [8]
- Caveats
- An IARC class reflects the strength of evidence that something can cause cancer, not the risk at a given intake [2]. The cohort authors list selection bias, residual confounding and reverse causation as limits [13].
Serotonin syndrome
The label reports serotonin syndrome with ondansetron, mostly with other serotonergic drugs such as SSRIs and SNRIs, some cases fatal. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Serotonin syndrome has been reported with 5-HT3 antagonists alone, and most reports involved SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, mirtazapine, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol or intravenous methylene blue. Some cases were fatal, and most occurred in a recovery room or infusion center. Cases have also followed ondansetron overdose alone [3].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Reports, with no denominator.
Tramadol compared with NSAIDs: deaths
Linked to more deaths within a year than naproxen in adults with osteoarthritis starting tramadol, 23.5 against 13.8 per 1,000 person-years.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In matched cohorts of adults with osteoarthritis, deaths in the first year were 23.5 per 1,000 person-years on tramadol and 13.8 on naproxen (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.07). Mortality was also higher than with diclofenac (HR 1.88), celecoxib (HR 1.70) and etoricoxib (HR 2.04), and did not differ from codeine (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.05) [32].
- Population
- 88,902 adults with osteoarthritis, mean age 70.1, 61.2% women, after propensity score matching [32].
- Sources
- [32]
- Caveats
- Observational. People given tramadol in place of an NSAID may have been sicker in ways matching did not capture.
Death from any cause
Mixed results: a veterans cohort linked proton pump inhibitor use to about 25% higher risk of death than H2 blocker use, while a 3-year randomized trial found no difference.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Over a median 5.7 years, proton pump inhibitor users had a higher risk of death than H2 blocker users (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.28) and than non-users (HR 1.15). The association held in people without gut conditions (HR 1.24) [37]. In a randomized trial, all-cause mortality did not differ between pantoprazole and placebo over a median 3 years [19].
- Population
- US veterans in a longitudinal cohort [37]; 17,598 adults in a randomized trial [19].
- Sources
- [37], [19]
- Caveats
- The cohort is observational and cannot rule out that sicker people were prescribed proton pump inhibitors [37].
Serotonin syndrome-like symptoms with antidepressants
One trial found one case of serotonin syndrome-like symptoms with SAMe added to an antidepressant. Other side effects were no higher than on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the 8-week add-on trial, SAMe was implicated in one case of serotonin syndrome-like symptoms. Adverse effects otherwise did not exceed placebo [4].
- Population
- 107 adults taking antidepressants [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- A single case in one trial.
Evening chronotype linked to death from any cause
One large cohort linked being a definite evening type to 10% higher death from any cause than being a definite morning type.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Definite evening types had higher mortality than definite morning types (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18). Each step toward eveningness was linked to a small rise in death (HR 1.02) and cardiovascular death (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.09) [16].
- Population
- 433,268 UK Biobank adults aged 38 to 73, mean follow-up 6.5 years, 10,534 deaths [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort with chronotype from a single question. Analyses adjusted for smoking, weight, sleep duration and illness, but residual confounding remains.
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that SNRIs can cause serotonin syndrome, more often with other serotonergic drugs. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The duloxetine label states that taking it with other serotonergic drugs increases the risk of serotonin syndrome. It names other SNRIs, SSRIs, triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, opioids, lithium, buspirone, amphetamines, tryptophan and St. John's Wort [18].
- Population
- Labeling statement [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- A label warning with no denominator.
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication, within 14 days before or 5 days after duloxetine, because of an increased risk of serotonin syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The duloxetine label lists as contraindications taking it with an MAOI antidepressant, taking it within 14 days of stopping one, and starting an MAOI within 5 days of stopping duloxetine. It also lists starting duloxetine in a person being treated with the antibiotic linezolid or intravenous methylene blue [18].
- Population
- Labeling statement [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that SSRIs can cause serotonin syndrome, alone or more often with other serotonergic drugs. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label describes serotonin syndrome as potentially life-threatening, with agitation, hallucinations, fast heart rate, unstable blood pressure, sweating, fever, tremor, rigidity, seizures, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. It states the risk is increased with triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, other SSRIs and SNRIs, fentanyl, tramadol, meperidine, methadone, lithium, tryptophan, buspirone, amphetamines and St. John's Wort, and that it can also occur on an SSRI alone [24].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports summarized in labeling [24].
- Sources
- [24]
- Caveats
- A label warning based on reports, with no denominator.
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication, within 14 days in either direction, because the combination raises the risk of serotonin syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that taking an SSRI with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor increases the risk of serotonin syndrome and lists the combination, or use within 14 days of stopping an MAOI, as a contraindication. Its examples are selegiline, tranylcypromine, isocarboxazid, phenelzine, the antibiotic linezolid and intravenous methylene blue [24].
- Population
- Labeling statement [24].
- Sources
- [24]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Raised IGF-1 and a cancer warning
The label warns of an increased risk of neoplasms and lists active cancer as a contraindication. IGF-1 rose 81% in one trial.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- IGF-1 rose 81.0% on tesamorelin and fell 5.0% on placebo [1]. The label states the effects of prolonged IGF-1 elevation are unknown, warns of an increased risk of neoplasms, and lists active malignancy as a contraindication [6].
- Population
- 412 adults with HIV [1]; label [6].
- Sources
- [1], [6]
- Caveats
- The cancer warning is a label precaution. The sourced trials did not report cancer rates.
DNA damage in laboratory and animal tests
Animal and lab studies only: EFSA concluded the extract can induce DNA damage, and that its safety was not established under any condition of use.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- EFSA's nutrition panel found positive results in an in vitro chromosome aberration test and in an in vivo comet assay at 2,000 mg/kg body weight in stomach and duodenum. It concluded the extract can induce DNA damage, particularly at first sites of contact, and that its safety had not been established under any condition of use [8].
- Population
- In vitro and animal studies [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Applies to the specific standardized water extract assessed. No human genotoxicity data were reported.
Decreased sweating and overheating
The label reports decreased sweating and raised body temperature, mostly in children and some after hot weather, occasionally needing hospital care. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Oligohidrosis with elevated body temperature has been reported, infrequently leading to hospitalization, most often in children and sometimes after exposure to high temperatures. Other carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and drugs with anticholinergic activity may add to the risk [3].
- Population
- Reports summarized in the label [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- No rate or comparison group.
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that trazodone can cause serotonin syndrome, more often with other serotonergic drugs. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that taking trazodone with other serotonergic drugs increases the risk of serotonin syndrome. Its examples are triptans, tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fentanyl, tramadol, lithium, tryptophan, buspirone and St. John's Wort [12].
- Population
- Labeling statement [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- A label warning with no denominator.
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication because the combination increases the risk of serotonin syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that trazodone is contraindicated in people taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors, including the antibiotic linezolid and intravenous methylene blue. Its examples are isocarboxazid, moclobemide, phenelzine, selegiline and tranylcypromine [12].
- Population
- Labeling statement [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Symptoms after stopping
Case reports: three people developed withdrawal symptoms despite gradual tapering. Pooled reviews of antidepressants give no rate for trazodone alone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A report describes three people who developed withdrawal symptoms although therapeutic doses of trazodone were stopped gradually [21]. The label lists nausea, sweating, low mood, irritability, dizziness, electric shock sensations, anxiety, insomnia and tinnitus among reactions after stopping serotonergic antidepressants [12]. Across antidepressants as a group, a meta-analysis found at least one discontinuation symptom in 31% of people stopping a drug and 17% stopping placebo [22].
- Population
- Three case reports [21]; 21,002 patients in 79 studies of antidepressants [22].
- Sources
- [21], [12], [22]
- Caveats
- The abstract of [22] names no figure for trazodone, so the pooled rate is context and not a trazodone rate. No systematic review of trazodone discontinuation was located.
Deaths in one trial of older veterans
One trial found more deaths on tretinoin 0.1% than vehicle in older veterans and stopped early. The authors judged a causal link unlikely.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The Veterans Affairs trial of tretinoin 0.1% twice daily to the face and ears was stopped 6 months early because of excess deaths in the tretinoin group. After adjusting for imbalances in age, other illnesses and smoking, the difference remained significant. The authors observed an association but did not infer a cause [17].
- Population
- 1,131 veterans, mean age 71, followed 2 to 6 years [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- Death was not a planned outcome. The abstract gives no death counts. No other source here reports such a signal.
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 1,131 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Nicotine poisoning in young children
Case reports: US poison centers recorded 8,269 liquid nicotine exposures in children under 6 from 2012 to 2017, mostly by swallowing.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- 92.5% of exposures were by ingestion and 83.9% involved children under 3. 35.1% were treated and released from a health care facility and 1.4% were admitted. The yearly rate rose from 0.7 to 10.4 per 100,000 children from 2012 to 2015, then fell to 8.3 in 2016, after a federal child-resistant packaging law [14].
- Population
- Children under 6 reported to the US National Poison Data System, January 2012 to April 2017 [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- Poison center reports undercount exposures and give no rate per household with e-liquid.
Low selenium intake
Limited evidence: one review found low selenium intake in European vegans.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A review of 48 European studies found vegan diets associated with low selenium intake and listed selenium among possible deficiencies [7].
- Population
- Vegans in 12 cohorts and 36 cross-sectional studies [7]. Observational.
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Intake only, with no blood measures reported in the abstract [7].
Mortality
Limited evidence: reviews disagree. Two found slightly more deaths, mostly at higher doses, and one found no effect up to 5,500 IU a day.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Sources disagree. A 2005 meta-analysis found 39 more deaths per 10,000 people in trials of 400 IU a day or more (95% CI 3 to 74), with risk rising above 150 IU a day [12]. A 2012 Cochrane review found a small increase with vitamin E in low-bias trials (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05, 46 trials) [14]. A 2011 meta-analysis of 57 trials and 246,371 people found no effect (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.02) and no dose relationship up to 5,500 IU a day [15].
- Population
- 135,967 participants in 19 trials [12]; 296,707 participants in 78 antioxidant trials [14]; 246,371 participants in 57 trials [15].
- Sources
- [12], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- High-dose trials in [12] were often small and in people with chronic disease [12]. The three analyses used different trial selections and models.
Emergency hospital admissions in older adults
Linked to a third of emergency hospital admissions for adverse drug events among US adults aged 65 or over, in national surveillance data from 2007 to 2009.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Of an estimated 99,628 emergency hospitalizations a year for adverse drug events in US adults aged 65 or over, warfarin was implicated in 33.3%, ahead of insulins (13.9%), oral antiplatelet agents (13.3%) and oral hypoglycemic agents (10.7%). Nearly two thirds of hospitalizations were due to unintentional overdoses [18].
- Population
- 5,077 cases in a national surveillance sample, 2007 to 2009 [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- A share of admissions, not a rate among people taking warfarin. The data predate wide use of DOACs.
Aspirin, clopidogrel and other blood thinners
The label lists aspirin, clopidogrel and other antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs as raising bleeding risk with warfarin. Studies of anticoagulants with aspirin found about 1.7 times the bleeding.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label lists anticoagulants such as heparin and dabigatran and antiplatelet agents such as aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole and prasugrel among drugs that can increase the risk of bleeding [11]. Among people on anticoagulants for venous clots, clinically relevant bleeding occurred at 36.6 per 100 patient-years during aspirin use against 16.9 without (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.11) [23]. In people with mechanical valves, bleeding became significantly more frequent when antiplatelet therapy was added to a coumarin [9].
- Population
- 8,246 patients on rivaroxaban or enoxaparin with a vitamin K antagonist [23]; 46 studies of mechanical valves [9].
- Sources
- [11], [23], [9]
- Caveats
- In one trial after heart attack, major bleeding was 0.62% per treatment-year on warfarin with or without aspirin [12]. Rates are per patient-years.
Herbal products and supplements
The label warns that garlic and ginkgo may add to bleeding, and that coenzyme Q10, St. John's wort and ginseng may weaken warfarin. Few controlled studies exist.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that some botanicals may cause bleeding when taken alone, naming garlic and Ginkgo biloba, and that these effects would be expected to add to warfarin's. It names coenzyme Q10, St. John's wort and ginseng as possibly decreasing warfarin's effect, and echinacea, grapefruit juice, ginkgo, goldenseal and St. John's wort as interacting through liver enzymes. It states that few adequate, well-controlled studies exist and that product contents vary [11]. A systematic overview added reports for green tea and danshen [21].
- Population
- Statements in labeling [11]; case reports and small studies in 181 articles [21].
- Sources
- [11], [21]
- Caveats
- Mostly case reports and expected effects, with no rates.
Inorganic arsenic in rice
FDA states long-term inorganic arsenic exposure is linked to skin, bladder and lung cancers, names children as most vulnerable, and sets an action level for infant rice cereal.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The FDA states that long-term exposure to inorganic arsenic has been associated with skin disorders, skin, bladder and lung cancers, and cardiovascular disease, and that high exposure during brain development is associated with learning disabilities and lowered IQ. It names fetuses, infants and children as particularly vulnerable, and publishes testing of rice and rice products [18]. In 2020 it issued an action level for inorganic arsenic in rice cereals for infants [19].
- Population
- US food supply, as assessed by the FDA [18][19].
- Sources
- [18], [19]
- Caveats
- Regulator statements about arsenic from all food sources, not a measured rate of harm from eating rice.
Death rates in observational studies
Mixed results: one cohort linked hypnotic prescriptions to over three times the death rate, a Z-drug meta-analysis was not significant, and a Medicare cohort matched trazodone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a matched cohort, people prescribed any hypnotic had higher mortality than people prescribed none, with hazard ratios of 3.60 (95% CI 2.92 to 4.44) at 0.4 to 18 doses a year and 5.32 (95% CI 4.50 to 6.30) above 132 doses a year. Hazards were elevated in separate analyses of zolpidem, eszopiclone and zaleplon [30]. Pooling five studies, mortality with Z-drugs trended higher without reaching significance (HR 1.73, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.16) [31]. In older adults not taking opioids, total mortality on Z-drugs did not differ from low-dose trazodone (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.05) [28].
- Population
- A matched cohort of people prescribed hypnotics and people prescribed none [30]; 2,350,093 patients in 25 studies [31]; 400,924 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or older [28].
- Sources
- [30], [31], [28]
- Caveats
- Observational. People prescribed sleep medicines differ from those who are not, and the meta-analysis found significant heterogeneity [31]. None of these studies shows the drug caused the deaths.
FDA warnings on unproven uses
FDA states hyperbaric devices are not proven to cure cancer, Lyme disease, autism or Alzheimer's disease, and that explosions and fires have occurred in unreviewed chambers at unaccredited facilities.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- FDA's consumer update lists the risks as ear and sinus pain, middle ear injuries including eardrum rupture, temporary vision changes, and rarely lung collapse. It says high oxygen concentrations pose a risk of fire, that explosions and fires have occurred in chambers not reviewed by FDA at unaccredited facilities, and that people have used zippered altitude-sickness bags to build homemade devices that pose risks of fire and suffocation. It names the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society as the accrediting body [1].
- Population
- US consumers [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The update carries a content date of July 26, 2021, and is cited from an archived copy because the page was no longer on FDA's site when checked in November 2026. FDA also states that serious complications are rare when chambers are used for cleared conditions.
Side effects overall
Shown to cause adverse effects in 30% of treated participants against 10% of controls across 24 randomized trials, more often above 2.0 ATA or beyond 10 sessions.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 24 RCTs (1,497 participants), adverse effects were reported by 30.11% of hyperbaric participants and 10.43% of controls. Ear discomfort was the most frequent, with 113 cases. Rates exceeded control when courses ran longer than 10 sessions or pressure was above 2.0 ATA [27]. In fibromyalgia studies, 23.8% of treated patients had adverse events and 6.5% withdrew because of them [7]. In a 10-session long COVID trial, adverse events occurred in 49% of the hyperbaric group and 44% of the sham group, most often cough and chest discomfort [13].
- Population
- 1,497 participants in 24 RCTs published from 2012 to 2022 [27]. 185 people with fibromyalgia [7]. 80 people with long COVID [13].
- Sources
- [27], [7], [13]
- Caveats
- Most recorded effects were mild and reversible. Trials screen out people at higher risk, and commercial wellness settings were not studied.
Ear barotrauma
Shown to injure the middle ear often: 43.2% of 236 hospital patients had barotrauma, most of it minor, and children in two trials had more ear problems than controls.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a chart review of 236 patients and 4,981 treatments, middle ear barotrauma occurred in 43.2%, and 84% of cases were at the two mildest grades [28]. In children with cerebral palsy, ear problems occurred in 27 of 57 on hyperbaric oxygen and 15 of 54 on pressurized air [26]. In children with autism, more had side effects with hyperbaric treatment than with sham (Peto odds ratio 4.40, 95% CI 1.33 to 14.48), mainly minor ear barotrauma [25].
- Population
- 236 patients at one academic trauma center [28]. 111 children [26]. 60 children [25].
- Sources
- [28], [26], [25], [1]
- Caveats
- The chart review included intubated hospital patients, who had more severe barotrauma. FDA lists eardrum rupture among possible injuries [1].
FDA consumer warning
FDA states it has not cleared or approved any whole-body cryotherapy device for medical treatment, and names asphyxiation, frostbite, burns and eye injury as hazards.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a consumer update dated July 5, 2016, FDA said it does not have evidence that whole-body cryotherapy treats conditions such as Alzheimer's, fibromyalgia, migraines, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, stress, anxiety or chronic pain. It listed potential hazards including asphyxiation, especially when liquid nitrogen is used for cooling, because nitrogen vapor in a closed room lowers oxygen and can cause loss of consciousness, along with frostbite, burns and eye injury. It also voiced concern about people choosing cryotherapy in place of established treatment [1].
- Population
- US consumers [1].
- Sources
- [1], [25]
- Caveats
- The update dates from 2016 and is cited here from an archived copy, since the page was no longer on FDA's site when checked in November 2026. A later safety review argues that some reports behind regulator concerns involved partial-body nitrogen cabins, not whole-body chambers [25].
Hypothermia, afterdrop and swim failure
Small studies found core temperature kept falling after leaving cold water in 10 of 11 swimmers, and only 5 of 10 swimmers lasted 90 minutes at 10°C.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After a swim in 11.7°C open water without wetsuits, 5 of 11 swimmers had a rectal temperature below 36.0°C and 1 below 35.0°C. Continued cooling after leaving the water occurred in 10 of 11 [32]. In a swimming flume, all 10 volunteers completed 90 minutes at 25°C and 5 did at 10°C. One reached swim failure at 61 minutes and 4 were withdrawn at a rectal temperature of 35°C [33]. At a 19.2 km open water race, hypothermia was found in 26 of 35 swimmers screened, of whom 5 needed short-stay hospital care and 2 critical care transfer [34]. Core temperature dropped for 15 minutes after a 30-minute sit in 16°C water [23].
- Population
- 11 swimmers [32]. 10 volunteers [33]. 109 race competitors [34]. 15 adults [23].
- Sources
- [32], [33], [34], [23]
- Caveats
- These are swims of tens of minutes to hours. No study located measured core temperature after plunges of a few minutes.
Chamber fires
Case series: 77 people died in 35 hyperbaric chamber fires worldwide from 1923 to 1996, every fatal fire in an oxygen-enriched atmosphere.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A review of chamber fires counted 77 deaths in 35 hyperbaric chamber fires. Twenty-five of the fires were in clinical chambers. Every fatal fire occurred in an atmosphere above 28% oxygen with abundant burnable material. Since 1980 the main cause was a prohibited ignition source carried in by an occupant. No fire deaths were reported in clinical chambers in North America in that period [30]. FDA states that explosions and fires have since occurred in chambers it had not reviewed, at unaccredited facilities [1].
- Population
- Chamber fires reported in Asia, Europe and North America, 1923 to 1996 [30].
- Sources
- [30], [1]
- Caveats
- The series ends in 1996 and gives no rate per treatment. No peer-reviewed count of later fires was located.
Heat strain at higher temperatures
One small study found 45 minutes in a 65°C far-infrared sauna raised core temperature 1.4°C, doubled heart rate and shrank plasma volume 11.6% in healthy adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Rectal temperature rose 1.4°C (95% CI 0.9 to 1.8). Heart rate rose from 74 to 153 beats a minute. Plasma volume fell 11.6% (95% CI -15.9 to -7.2), with sweat losses of 1.4 L an hour. Mean arterial pressure was 9 mmHg lower immediately afterward. Participants rated the heat as extremely hot and extremely uncomfortable [13].
- Population
- 12 healthy adults, 6 of them women, in a single 45-minute exposure [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Healthy volunteers, one session. The exposure was three times as long as a Waon session and hotter than the sports protocols.
Deaths in the sauna
Case series: sauna deaths in Finland ran below 2 per 100,000 people a year, and half or more of those who died had been drinking alcohol.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In Finland from 1990 to 2002, deaths occurring in a sauna numbered fewer than 2 per 100,000 inhabitants a year. About half (51%) were natural deaths, heat exposure was the cause in 25%, and 50% of all cases were under the influence of alcohol [36]. In Sweden from 1992 to 2003, 77 sauna deaths were identified, 82% of them men. Of 69 with blood alcohol measured, 49 (71%) tested positive. Of those found dead in a sauna, all but 2 were alone [37].
- Population
- Forensic autopsy records for Finland, 1990 to 2002 [36], and Sweden, 1992 to 2003 [37].
- Sources
- [36], [37]
- Caveats
- Autopsy series count deaths that happened in a sauna. They cannot show how many would have happened elsewhere, and they give no rate per session.
Side effects reported by sauna users
In a survey of 482 regular sauna users, reported adverse reactions were mostly minor, chiefly dizziness, dehydration and headache. Two reports involved hospital care.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Adverse reactions were recorded as mostly minor (93.1%), primarily dizziness, dehydration and headache. Two reports, of chest pain and of eye irritation, required hospitalization [30]. A systematic review of 40 clinical studies with 3,855 participants found one study reporting an adverse outcome and called for better data on the frequency of side effects [35].
- Population
- 482 survey respondents [30]. Participants in 40 studies of repeated dry sauna, 13 of them randomized [35].
- Sources
- [30], [35]
- Caveats
- The survey reached current sauna users, so people who stopped because of side effects are missing. Most studies in the review had fewer than 40 participants and did not collect side effects systematically [35].
Adverse events in published reports
A scoping review found 16 documented adverse events after whole-body cryotherapy in 5 case reports and 2 trials, 4 of them graded serious.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The 16 events were cold panniculitis, transient global amnesia, cerebral bleeding, moyamoya syndrome and aortic dissection from case reports, and 11 minor events in trials: headache, discomfort or dizziness, lasting shivering, raised blood pressure and hives. The reviewers rated causality possible or probable for the case reports and concluded the risks were within acceptable limits when contraindications are followed [25].
- Population
- Five case reports and two randomized trials [25].
- Sources
- [25], [2]
- Caveats
- The review's authors are a consortium of cryotherapy researchers. Events were counted only if published, and a Cochrane review found that none of its trials actively monitored adverse events [2].
Mixed results44
Body weight
Mixed results: trials found no weight change from adding dairy without cutting calories, and 1.2 to 1.3 kg more weight loss when dairy was part of calorie-restricted diets.
Compared with control diets lower in dairy [6][8]; usual weight loss diets with less dairy [7]; 200 g a day less dairy, in a dose-response model of cohorts [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 29 trials, dairy did not change body weight overall (-0.14 kg, 95% CI -0.66 to 0.38, I² 86.3%) and modestly reduced body fat (-0.45 kg, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.11). Weight fell in energy-restricted or short trials, and rose in trials without energy restriction or lasting a year or more [6]. Without energy restriction, more dairy did not significantly change weight, fat or waist size, while high-dairy weight loss diets gave 1.29 kg more weight loss (95% CI -1.98 to -0.60) [7]. In energy-restricted trials in adults aged 18 to 50, mostly women, 2 to 4 servings a day gave 1.16 kg more weight loss (95% CI -1.66 to -0.66) and less loss of lean mass [8]. In cohorts, overweight or obesity was 25% lower per extra 200 g a day of total dairy [9].
- Population
- 2,101 adults in 29 trials [6]. 14 trials [7]. 27 trials, median 16 weeks, 90% women [8]. Cohort studies [9].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was high [6]. The calorie-restricted results come largely from women [8]. Cohort links are observational.
Any condition, pooled placebo-controlled trials
Mixed results: pooled trials across conditions favored homeopathy over placebo, and the advantage shrank or disappeared in the largest, most reliable and registered trials.
Compared with placebo [5][6][7][8][9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 89 trials the pooled odds ratio was 2.45 (95% CI 2.05 to 2.93) in favor of homeopathy, 1.66 in the 26 good-quality trials, and 1.78 after correcting for publication bias. The authors found insufficient evidence of a clear effect for any single condition [5]. Across 110 homeopathy trials, restricting to 8 large, higher-quality trials gave an odds ratio of 0.88 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.19), no difference from placebo, while matched conventional drug trials kept an effect (0.58) [6]. For individualized homeopathy, 22 trials gave an odds ratio of 1.53 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.91), and the 3 trials with reliable evidence gave 1.98 (95% CI 1.16 to 3.38) [7]. For non-individualized homeopathy, 54 trials gave a standardized mean difference of -0.33, reduced to -0.16 after adjusting for publication bias, and the 3 reliable trials showed no significant difference (-0.18, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.09) [8]. Unregistered trials showed larger effects (SMD -0.53) than registered trials (SMD -0.14, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.07), and about 38% of registered homeopathy trials since 2002 were never published [9].
- Population
- 89 trials [5]. 110 homeopathy and 110 conventional trials, median 65 participants [6]. 32 trials in 24 conditions [7]. 75 trials in 48 conditions [8]. Registered and published homeopathy trials to 2021 [9].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Most trials were rated at high or unclear risk of bias [7][8]. In both homeopathy and conventional medicine, smaller and lower-quality trials showed larger effects [6]. Several reviews pool many different conditions and remedies.
Body composition and adverse events in trials of growth hormone
Shown in trials of growth hormone to shift fat and lean mass by about 2 kg in older adults, with more swelling, joint pain and carpal tunnel syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- IGF-1 manages the effects of growth hormone in the body [1], and these trials gave growth hormone without aiming at an IGF-1 level. In community-dwelling adults with a mean age of 69 who were not being treated for a specific illness, growth hormone lowered fat mass by 2.1 kg (95% CI 1.35 to 2.8) and raised lean mass by 2.1 kg (1.3 to 2.9), with no change in weight, bone density or most blood lipids. Treated people were more likely to have soft tissue swelling, joint pain, carpal tunnel syndrome and breast growth in men, and somewhat more likely to develop diabetes or impaired fasting glucose [10]. In adults with confirmed growth hormone deficiency, it lowered weight by 2.31 kg (1.96 to 2.66) and body fat by 2.56 kg (2.16 to 2.97) and raised lean mass by 1.38 kg (1.10 to 1.65). Swelling had a relative risk of 6.07 (4.34 to 8.48) and joint stiffness 4.17 (1.4 to 12.38), with no significant change in bone density. Quality of life improved in 11 of 16 trials [11].
- Population
- 220 treated participants in 18 study populations, mean treatment 27 weeks [10]. More than 3,400 patients in 54 randomized trials [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [1]
- Caveats
- A marker that tracks an outcome is not always one whose correction changes it. Low IGF-1 went with more deaths in cohorts, and these trials measured body composition, not deaths. The trials in older adults were small and short [10].
Death from cancer
Mixed results: pooled trials found 16% fewer cancer deaths with vitamin D supplements, while standardized cohort data found no clear link between the blood level and cancer death.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 52 randomized trials, vitamin D supplementation reduced the risk of death from cancer (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95) [10]. In a trial of 2,000 IU a day, invasive cancer did not differ from placebo (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.06) and the hazard ratio for death from cancer was 0.83 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.02) [11]. Across cohort studies, the bottom third of baseline levels had a relative risk of death from cancer of 1.14 against the top third (95% CI 1.01 to 1.29) [9]. Pooled individual data with standardized measurements found no significant linear association between the level and cancer death [8].
- Population
- 75,454 participants in 52 trials [10]. 25,871 US adults [11]. 73 cohort studies [9]. 26,916 participants in 8 European studies [8].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [9], [8]
- Caveats
- Cancer death was a secondary outcome in the trials. The largest single trial found no effect on being diagnosed with cancer [11].
Fever
Mixed results: a review of children's trials called the evidence against placebo inconclusive, and ibuprofen lowered temperature slightly more in children under 2.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of 12 trials in children judged the trial evidence that paracetamol lowers fever more than placebo to be inconclusive. In 2 trials with 120 children, the share without fever by the second hour did not differ significantly between paracetamol and sponging (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.61) [12]. In children under 2, ibuprofen lowered temperature more than acetaminophen within 4 hours (SMD 0.38, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.67) and at 4 to 24 hours (SMD 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.45), with similar serious adverse events (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.33) [13]. In intensive care patients with fever and suspected infection, 1 g of intravenous acetaminophen every 6 hours did not change days free of intensive care (23 against 22) or deaths by day 90 (15.9% against 16.6%) [14].
- Population
- 1,509 children in 12 trials [12]; 241,138 children under 2 in 19 studies, 11 of them randomized [13]; 700 intensive care patients with a temperature of 38°C or higher [14].
- Sources
- [12], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Outcomes varied between the children's trials and none reported the review's primary outcome [12]. The intensive care trial measured recovery, not comfort.
Death from any cause
Mixed results: pooled cohorts found fewer deaths at higher ALT in North America and more in Asia, and a US survey found no association.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 19 cohort studies, comparing the top and bottom thirds of baseline ALT gave a relative risk of death from any cause of 0.82 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.86) in North American populations and 1.43 (1.08 to 1.90) in Asian populations [14]. In US adults without viral hepatitis, ALT above 30 U/L in men or 19 U/L in women was not associated with death from any cause (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.6) [11].
- Population
- Over 9.24 million participants and 242,953 deaths in 19 cohorts, which also covered other liver enzymes [14]. 14,950 US adults followed for 12 years [11].
- Sources
- [14], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. The authors of the meta-analysis could not explain the difference between regions and called for further study [14]. These studies cannot say why a higher ALT went with fewer deaths in the North American cohorts.
Death from any cause and the light drinking debate
Mixed results: older pooled cohorts linked drinking to 13% lower death than not drinking, while a 2023 analysis correcting for former drinker bias found no lower risk.
Compared with non-drinkers [2]; lifetime nondrinkers [3]; current drinkers of more than 0 and up to 100 g a week [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pooled cohorts found lower death from all causes in drinkers than non-drinkers (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.92) [2]. Across 107 cohorts, after adjusting for former drinker bias and study quality, death did not differ between lifetime nondrinkers and occasional drinkers of under 1.3 g a day (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.06) or low-volume drinkers of 1.3 to 24 g a day (RR 0.93, P = 0.07). Risk rose at 45 to 64 g a day (RR 1.19) and 65 g or more (RR 1.35), and female drinkers overall had higher risk than female lifetime nondrinkers (RR 1.22) [3]. Among current drinkers only, death was lowest at about 100 g a week or less. Against drinkers of up to 100 g a week, those drinking over 350 g a week had 4 to 5 years shorter life expectancy at age 40 [4]. A global analysis put the lowest-risk intake at 0 to 0.6 standard drinks a day for people aged 15 to 39, and 0.1 to 1.9 for people 40 and older, varying by region [5].
- Population
- 84 prospective cohorts [2]. 4,838,825 participants and 425,564 deaths in 107 cohorts [3]. 599,912 current drinkers without cardiovascular disease in 83 studies from 19 high-income countries [4]. Disease rates for 204 countries [5].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- All observational. Many cohorts count "sick quitters", former drinkers who cut down or stopped for health reasons, among non-drinkers, which makes drinkers look healthier by comparison. Adjusting for this removed the lower risk [3]. Light drinkers also have other healthier habits, and adjusting for them weakened the apparent benefit in a UK cohort [6].
Cancer
Mixed results: high intake was linked to 18% lower cancer incidence, while links to cancer death were small or absent in pooled cohorts.
Compared with the lowest intake group [2]; people drinking no coffee [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- High against low consumption was linked to 18% lower incident cancer (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89), with lower risk of several specific cancers [2]. One dose-response meta-analysis found no link between coffee and cancer death [4]. A later one found cancer death lowest at 2 cups a day (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99) [3].
- Population
- Meta-analyses of observational studies [2]. 21 prospective studies [4]. 40 studies [3].
- Sources
- [2], [4], [3]
- Caveats
- Observational. Smoking is tied to both coffee drinking and cancer, and the umbrella review found harmful links largely disappeared with adequate adjustment for smoking [2].
Body weight
Mixed results: pooled trials found no significant change in body mass index with sensor use, while single small trials ranged from no difference to 5 kg more weight loss.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people without diabetes, body mass index did not differ between sensor users and controls (SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.63 to 0.12, P = 0.19) [10]. Across trials mostly in diabetes, differences in weight (-0.7 kg, 95% CI -1.4 to 0.0) and body mass index (-0.4, 95% CI -0.9 to 0.0) were not statistically significant [14]. In 35 women with overweight or obesity in a 12-week exercise and diet program, those who also used a sensor at the midpoint lost 5.5 kg against 0.2 kg in controls (P < 0.001) [17]. In 39 overweight adults with impaired glucose tolerance or mild type 2 diabetes, 24-week weight change did not differ (-1.8 kg with a sensor, -2.2 kg without) [18].
- Population
- 1,074 participants without diabetes in 23 studies [10]. 2,996 participants in 25 trials [14]. 35 women [17]. 39 adults [18].
- Sources
- [10], [14], [17], [18]
- Caveats
- The authors of one review concluded a sensor is unlikely to achieve weight goals on its own without accompanying behavioral intervention [10]. The single trials were small and unblinded, and baseline body mass index differed between groups in one [18].
Cancer
Mixed results: one meta-analysis linked 7,000 steps a day to 37% fewer cancer deaths than 2,000, and found no significant difference in new cancers.
Compared with 2,000 steps a day [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against 2,000 steps a day, 7,000 steps was linked to 37% lower cancer mortality (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.72) and a non-significant 6% lower cancer incidence (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.01) [4].
- Population
- 3 studies for cancer deaths and 2 for new cancers [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Observational and few studies. Heterogeneity was 64.5% for cancer deaths and 73.7% for new cancers, and certainty for new cancers was rated low [4]. Cancer can lower activity before it is diagnosed.
Death from any cause
Mixed results: the highest egg intake was not linked to death in pooled cohorts, while dose-response models linked each extra egg to slightly higher death.
Compared with the lowest intake [10]; one fewer 50 g egg a day [6]; half an egg a day less [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The highest against the lowest intake was not linked to death from any cause (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.11), heart disease or stroke, while each extra egg a week was linked to 2% higher death [10]. In 27,078 men, each extra 50 g egg a day was linked to higher death (HR 1.06) [6]. In US cohorts, each extra half egg a day was linked to higher death (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.11), and not after adjusting for dietary cholesterol [8].
- Population
- 2,216,720 participants and 232,408 deaths in 33 cohorts [10]. 27,078 men in the ATBC study [6]. 29,615 US adults [8].
- Sources
- [10], [6], [8]
- Caveats
- Observational. The review rated certainty low to moderate [10].
Death from any cause
Mixed results: a meta-analysis of adults without diabetes tied the highest HOMA-IR group to 34% more deaths, with a weaker, borderline link for fasting insulin.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Comparing the highest with the lowest category, the pooled adjusted risk ratio for death from any cause was 1.13 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.27, P = 0.058) for fasting insulin and 1.34 (1.11 to 1.62) for HOMA-IR. For cardiovascular death it was 2.11 (1.01 to 4.41) for HOMA-IR in two studies and 1.40 (0.49 to 3.96) for fasting insulin in one [14].
- Population
- 26,976 adults without diabetes in 7 articles [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- Observational. The authors call the findings for cardiovascular death unreliable because so few studies were included [14].
32 more
Death from any cause at high levels
Mixed results: one Danish cohort linked ferritin of 600 ng/mL or more to 50% more deaths, while a pooled analysis of population studies found no link.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Danish general population cohort, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.1 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.2) for ferritin of 200 ng/mL or more against less than 200, and 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.8) for 600 or more. Median survival was 55 years at 600 or more, 72 years at 400 to 599, 76 years at 200 to 399 and 79 years below 200. For 600 or more, hazard ratios were 1.6 for cancer death and 1.5 for cardiovascular death. The same paper's meta-analysis of population studies comparing the top with the reference quartile or third found an odds ratio for death of 1.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.1) [9].
- Population
- 8,988 adults in the Copenhagen City Heart Study, 6,364 deaths over a median 23 years [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Observational. Ferritin rises with infection and inflammation [2][3], so a high level may mark disease already present and need not reflect iron itself.
Chronic pain and knee osteoarthritis
Mixed results: omega-3 lowered chronic pain but not osteoarthritis pain in one review, while krill oil reviews found better knee osteoarthritis pain scores.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 41 RCTs (3,759 participants), omega-3 lowered chronic pain intensity (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.34, I² 87%), from -0.27 at 1 month to -0.83 at 6 months. Effects were significant in rheumatoid arthritis, migraine and mixed chronic pain, and not in osteoarthritis or breast pain [27]. In knee osteoarthritis, krill oil improved WOMAC pain (SMD -0.60, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.21), stiffness and function across 5 RCTs (730 participants), with no change on a visual analog pain scale [28]. A 2026 review of 6 RCTs (971 participants) also found better WOMAC pain and function at week 4 [29].
- Population
- Adults with chronic pain conditions [27]; adults with knee osteoarthritis [28][29].
- Sources
- [27], [28], [29]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was high in [27]. The reviews disagree on osteoarthritis, though the krill reviews tested one product type. Lower doses (1.35 g a day or less) did as well as higher doses [27].
Death from any cause
Mixed results: one meta-analysis tied the highest HOMA-IR group to 34% more deaths from any cause, while another found no link with fatal cardiovascular events or cancer deaths.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In adults without diabetes, the pooled adjusted risk ratio for death from any cause comparing the highest with the lowest category was 1.34 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.62) for HOMA-IR and 1.13 (1.00 to 1.27, P = 0.058) for fasting insulin. For cardiovascular death it was 2.11 (1.01 to 4.41) for HOMA-IR in two studies [15]. A later meta-analysis found no association of a higher HOMA-IR with fatal major cardiovascular events or with cancer mortality [12].
- Population
- 26,976 adults without diabetes in 7 articles [15]. 215,878 participants in 38 cohort studies across all outcomes [12].
- Sources
- [15], [12]
- Caveats
- Observational. The authors of the first analysis call the findings for cardiovascular death unreliable because so few studies were included [15].
VO2 max and endurance performance
Mixed results: some reviews found higher VO2 max in women and iron-deficient athletes, while others found no change in iron-deficient adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In women of reproductive age (22 trials), iron raised relative VO2 max by 2.35 mL/kg/min (95% CI 0.82 to 3.88) and lowered heart rate at set workloads by 4.05 beats per minute [6]. In iron-deficient non-anemic endurance athletes, VO2 max rose (g 0.610, 95% CI 0.399 to 0.821) [1]. In non-anemic iron-deficient adults, VO2 max did not change (SMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.37, 9 trials, 235 participants) [3]. In athletes, the VO2 max trend did not reach significance (SMD 0.49, 95% CI -0.09 to 1.07) [2].
- Population
- Women of reproductive age [6]; endurance athletes [1][2]; non-anemic iron-deficient adults [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The reviews disagree. Only 3 of 24 studies in [6] were at low risk of bias, and its abstract does not state participants' anemia or iron status.
Death from any cause
Mixed results: one Danish cohort found more deaths at both low and high LDL cholesterol, while statin trials found 10% fewer deaths per 1 mmol/L lowered.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 108,243 Danish adults, the association with death from any cause was U-shaped. Compared with 132 to 154 mg/dL, the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.25 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.36) below 70 mg/dL and 1.15 (1.05 to 1.27) above 189 mg/dL. The level with the lowest risk was 140 mg/dL overall and 89 mg/dL in people on lipid-lowering treatment. The pattern held for cancer and other deaths and not for cardiovascular deaths, and any increase in LDL cholesterol went with more heart attacks [15]. Across 26 statin trials, death from any cause fell 10% per 1.0 mmol/L reduction (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.93), with no significant effect on deaths from cancer or other non-vascular causes [12].
- Population
- 108,243 people aged 20 to 100 in the Copenhagen General Population Study, median follow-up 9.4 years, 11,376 deaths [15]. About 170,000 participants in 26 statin trials [12].
- Sources
- [15], [12]
- Caveats
- The cohort finding is observational, and illness that lowers LDL cholesterol before death (reverse causation) cannot be ruled out. The trials tested lowering with a statin in people selected for trials, over about 5 years.
Fibromyalgia pain
Mixed results: two meta-analyses found less fibromyalgia pain than placebo, while a third and two later trials found no difference.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 4 RCTs (222 patients), pain scores fell more than on placebo (MD -0.86, 95% CI -1.20 to -0.51, I² 33%), while the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire did not differ [1]. A meta-analysis of 5 RCTs found less pain than placebo (SMD -0.61, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.08) and no change in mechanical pain threshold [2]. A third meta-analysis of 8 trials found no difference from placebo in pain (SMD -0.50, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.19, I² 91%) or symptom severity [3]. In a crossover trial of 58 patients, 4.5 mg a day did not differ from placebo in pain ratings or questionnaire scores [4]. In 98 women followed for 12 months, pain at 3 months fell 0.33 points on LDN and 0.64 on placebo (difference 0.49, p 0.236) [5].
- Population
- Adults with fibromyalgia in small RCTs [1][2][3], 58 patients in a crossover trial with treatment periods of about 3 weeks [4], and 98 women over 12 months [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The meta-analyses reach different answers from overlapping trials. Most trials were crossover designs with fewer than 60 people. The two trials published after the meta-analyses found no difference [4][5].
Cancer
Mixed results: one trial and pooled trials found slightly less total cancer, while another trial found no change. Two trials found less lung cancer.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pooling 4 RCTs (48,859 people), multivitamins were associated with lower cancer incidence (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99) and lung cancer (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.95, 2 RCTs) [4]. In the Physicians' Health Study II, total cancer fell from 18.3 to 17.0 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.998), with no change in prostate or colorectal cancer [5]. In COSMOS, invasive cancer did not differ (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.09), and lung cancer was lower (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.92) [2].
- Population
- Healthy adults without known deficiency [4]; male physicians over 11.2 years [5]; older US adults over 3.6 years [2].
- Sources
- [2], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The trials disagree on total cancer. Absolute risk differences in the adequately powered trials ranged from -0.2% to -1.2% [4]. The Task Force review noted important limitations in the multivitamin evidence [4].
Death from any cause
Mixed results: higher non-HDL cholesterol went with more deaths in people with heart disease or on statins, while pooled general-population studies found no clear link with cardiovascular death.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In statin-treated Danish adults, non-HDL cholesterol above the median with LDL cholesterol below it had hazard ratios of 1.18 for death from any cause (95% CI 1.02 to 1.36) and 1.78 for heart attack (1.35 to 2.34), compared with both below the median. ApoB above the median with non-HDL cholesterol below it had a hazard ratio for death of 1.21 (1.03 to 1.41) [16]. In a meta-analysis of people with coronary heart disease, high baseline non-HDL cholesterol went with a risk ratio for death of 1.24 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.46) [17]. In a meta-analysis of observational studies, elevated non-HDL cholesterol was not associated with cardiovascular death in the general population (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.80) or in people with type 2 diabetes (RR 1.08, 0.57 to 2.07), while it was associated with cardiovascular disease in both (RR 1.59 and 1.99) [18].
- Population
- 13,015 statin-treated adults in the Copenhagen General Population Study, median follow-up 8 years [16]. 11,057 people with coronary heart disease in 6 studies followed 18 to 148 months [17]. 156,381 people in 13 studies [18].
- Sources
- [16], [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational. High and low were defined by each cohort's own median or categories [16][17]. The confidence intervals for cardiovascular death are wide [18].
Body weight, against water or no sweetener
Mixed results: against water, one review found no weight difference and another 1.24 kg less, while trials against no sweetener found little or no change.
Compared with water [5][6]; no or lower sweetener intake [8]; control groups the abstract does not describe [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Replacing water with sweetened drinks was not associated with body weight, with low certainty [5]. In 3 sustained trial comparisons against water, sweeteners lowered weight by 1.24 kg (95% CI -2.22 to -0.26), and before a meal energy intake did not differ (-2 kcal) [6]. In adults, a small BMI fall (-0.6, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.01) came from 2 studies of 174 people, and no effect was seen in people actively trying to lose weight [8]. In 7 trials, sweeteners did not significantly change BMI (-0.37, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.36) [9].
- Population
- 974 adults in 9 trials of sweetened drinks against water [5]. 3 trial comparisons [6]. Small trials in adults and children [8]. 1,003 participants in 7 trials, median 6 months [9].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Few trials, mostly small and short [8][9]. Certainty for the water comparison was low [5].
Cancer
Mixed results: pooled case-control and cohort studies linked high intake to 31% less cancer, while a pooling of prospective cohorts found no link.
Compared with the lowest intake [14]; 25 g a day less, in a dose-response model [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The highest olive oil intake was linked to lower odds of any cancer (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.77), including breast, gastrointestinal and urinary tract cancer [14]. In prospective cohorts, each extra 25 g a day was not significantly linked to cancer (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.03) [3].
- Population
- 37 case-control studies and 8 cohorts with 929,771 participants [14]. 1,285,064 participants and 58,892 cancer cases in cohorts and one trial [3].
- Sources
- [14], [3]
- Caveats
- Case-control studies ask about diet after diagnosis and are prone to recall bias. The cohort-only analysis found no link [3].
Death from any cause
Mixed results: one meta-analysis linked dog ownership to 24% fewer deaths, another found no adjusted link for pets or dogs, and most older-adult cohorts found none.
Compared with people without a dog [1]; people without pets [2]; people without a dog [3]; older adults without pets [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Dog ownership was linked to 24% lower death from any cause (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.86), and to 65% lower death in people with prior coronary events (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.69) [1]. Pet owners had lower death rates unadjusted (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.87) but not after adjustment (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.78), and dog ownership was not significantly linked [2]. In Sweden, dog owners had lower death rates living alone (HR 0.67) and with others (HR 0.89) [3]. In older adults, 2 of 6 studies found lower death from any cause and 4 found no link [4].
- Population
- 3,837,005 participants in 10 studies [1]. 26 studies [2]. 3,432,153 Swedish adults [3]. Community-dwelling older adults in 26 longitudinal studies from 21 countries and regions [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational. The pooled estimates were not adjusted for confounders in the first review [1]. Health, income and living situation shape who owns a pet.
Pain, compared with controls pooled together
Mixed results: a meta-analysis of four trials reported less pain with Reiki, though its interval included no effect, and a review of biofield therapies rated pain evidence strong.
Compared with control groups the source abstract does not describe [9]; control conditions in 66 studies of biofield therapies, which the abstract does not describe [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 4 trials, pain scores after the last session were lower with Reiki (SMD -0.927, 95% CI -1.867 to 0.0124), an interval that crosses zero although the author reported a significant decrease [9]. A best-evidence synthesis of Reiki, therapeutic touch and healing touch rated the evidence strong for reducing pain intensity in pain populations and moderate in hospitalized and cancer populations [10].
- Population
- 212 participants in 4 randomized trials [9]. 66 clinical studies of biofield therapies [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- The synthesis rated study quality medium overall and did not separate sham from other comparisons in its abstract [10].
Endurance performance
Mixed results: a review of 26 trials found better VO2 max and endurance in healthy young adults, and a later review of 9 trials found no VO2 max effect.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 26 RCTs (668 healthy participants, mean age 22), rhodiola improved VO2 max (11 studies, ES 0.32), time to exhaustion (7 studies, ES 0.38) and time trial performance (5 studies, ES -0.40). Creatine kinase (ES -0.84) and lactate fell, and IL-6 and CRP did not change. VO2 max gains were larger above 600 mg a day [4]. A systematic review of 10 papers reported less pain and muscle damage after training and improved explosive power [5]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (424 healthy adults) found no significant effect on VO2 max (95% CI -0.91 to 2.99) [6].
- Population
- Healthy young adults, mean intervention 33 days [4]; exercise studies [5]; healthy adults [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- The two meta-analyses disagree on VO2 max [4][6]. The 2025 abstract reports no confidence intervals and notes heterogeneity [4]. Reference [5] is narrative.
Death from any cause
Mixed results: salt reduction advice trials found no fewer deaths, one salt substitute trial found 12% fewer, and one cohort linked both low and high intakes to more deaths.
Compared with control groups without salt reduction advice or substitution [11]; control groups without sodium reduction counseling [12]; regular salt [10]; people excreting 4.00 to 5.99 g of sodium a day [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In trials of salt reduction advice, death did not fall in people with hypertension (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15) and the estimate in people without it was imprecise (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.12) [11]. In the trial follow-up, deaths did not differ (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.26) [12]. In one large trial of a salt substitute, deaths were fewer (rate ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95) [10]. In a cohort of 101,945 adults in 17 countries, estimated sodium of 7 g a day or more (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.30) and below 3 g a day (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.44) were both linked to more deaths or cardiovascular events than 4 to 6 g a day [13].
- Population
- 3,518 adults without and 3,085 with hypertension in trials [11]. 3,126 adults with prehypertension [12]. 20,995 older Chinese adults [10]. 101,945 adults in 17 countries followed a mean 3.7 years [13].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [10], [13]
- Caveats
- The cohort estimated sodium from one morning urine sample, and people eating little may be sicker to begin with, so reverse causation and confounding are possible [13]. Advice trials cut salt less than the substitute trial.
Cancer
Mixed results: cohort studies linked higher selenium to less cancer, while trials that raised selenium found no change in cancer rates.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Cochrane review, cohort studies comparing the highest with the lowest category of selenium exposure found lower cancer incidence (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.93) and lower cancer mortality (OR 0.76, 0.59 to 0.97). In randomized trials at low risk of bias, selenium supplements did not change the incidence of any cancer (RR 1.01, 0.93 to 1.10) or of prostate cancer (RR 1.01, 0.90 to 1.14). In the largest trial, supplementation raised the risk of high-grade prostate cancer in participants with the highest selenium status at the start. The review found no confirmation of the earlier hypothesis that people with low blood selenium could lower their cancer risk by taking more [12].
- Population
- 10 randomized trials with 27,232 participants and 70 observational cohort studies with more than 2,360,000 participants [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- The review rates the trial evidence as high certainty and the observational evidence as very low certainty, citing exposure misclassification and unmeasured confounding. Trial participants were 88% male [12].
Death and readmission after low sodium is corrected
Mixed results: pooled observational studies linked a rise in low sodium to fewer deaths, while a 2,173-person trial of targeted correction found no fewer deaths or readmissions.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 15 studies, any improvement of hyponatremia was associated with a lower risk of death (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.81). The association was stronger in the 8 studies that set the threshold for improvement at above 130 mmol/L (OR 0.51, 0.31 to 0.86) [11]. In a randomized trial in hospitalized patients with sodium below 130 mmol/L, a targeted correction program brought sodium to 135 to 145 mmol/L in 60.4% of patients, against 46.2% with routine care. Death or readmission within 30 days occurred in 20.5% and 21.8% (difference -1.3 percentage points, 95% CI -4.9 to 2.2). Death occurred in 8.0% of each group [10].
- Population
- 13,816 patients in 15 studies [11]. 2,173 hospitalized patients at 9 European centers, median age 73, median sodium 127 mmol/L at entry [10].
- Sources
- [11], [10]
- Caveats
- The pooled studies were not randomized, so people whose sodium rose may have differed in other ways from those whose sodium did not [11]. The trial counted outcomes for 30 days and tested one program of correction in hospital. Overcorrection occurred in 2.3% of the intervention group and 1.4% of the control group, and no case of osmotic demyelination syndrome was observed [10].
Death from any cause
Mixed results: a Korean cohort of 12.8 million linked both low and high total cholesterol to more deaths, while statin trials found 10% fewer deaths per 1 mmol/L lowered.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 12.8 million Korean adults, the association with death from any cause was U-shaped. Below 200 mg/dL, each 39 mg/dL higher total cholesterol went with 23% lower mortality (95% CI 23 to 24). From 200 mg/dL upward, each 39 mg/dL higher went with 7% higher mortality (6 to 7). The levels with the lowest mortality were 210 to 249 mg/dL in most age and sex groups, and lower in men aged 18 to 34 (180 to 219 mg/dL) and women aged 18 to 34 (160 to 199 mg/dL) [12]. Across 26 statin trials, death from any cause fell 10% per 1.0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.93) [10].
- Population
- 12,815,006 Korean adults who had routine health examinations in 2001 to 2004, followed until 2013, with 694,423 deaths [12]. About 170,000 participants in 26 statin trials [10].
- Sources
- [12], [10]
- Caveats
- The cohort finding is observational, and illness that lowers cholesterol before death (reverse causation) cannot be ruled out. The trials tested lowering with a statin in people selected for trials, over about 5 years.
Nerve function in a trial that gave C-peptide in type 1 diabetes
One trial found 52 weeks of long-acting C-peptide in type 1 diabetes did not improve nerve conduction against placebo, while vibration sense improved 25%.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Patients received weekly pegylated C-peptide at 0.8 mg or 2.4 mg, or placebo. Plasma C-peptide rose to 1.8 to 2.2 nmol/L on the low dose and 5.6 to 6.8 nmol/L on the high dose. After 52 weeks, sural nerve conduction velocity had risen by 1.0 m/s on C-peptide and 1.2 m/s on placebo. Vibration perception threshold improved by 25% on C-peptide and was unchanged on placebo (P below 0.001), and the clinical neuropathy score did not change [10].
- Population
- 250 people with type 1 diabetes and mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy, 144 on C-peptide and 106 on placebo [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- One trial, in which the main nerve conduction measure did not differ from placebo. It tested giving C-peptide to people who make little of their own, and says nothing about a person's own C-peptide level [10].
Diet and physical activity
Limited evidence: one systematic review found selected dietary changes with visible sensor readings in adults without diabetes and no clear difference in physical activity.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 12 studies found two randomized dietary comparisons suggesting selected improvements. In one 8-week trial, a sensor plus low glycemic index education reduced carbohydrate intake by 15.2 g (95% CI 9.5 to 20.9) and glycemic load by 19.9 (95% CI 10.7 to 29.0) more than education alone. Physical activity showed no clear difference (-28.5 MET-minutes a week, 95% CI -171.9 to 114.8) [19].
- Population
- Adults without diabetes in 12 randomized, nonrandomized and qualitative studies [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- Certainty was rated low for dietary outcomes and very low for the others. Differences between studies ruled out meta-analysis. The review concluded that large, durable benefits and an effect of the sensor on its own are not established [19].
Glutathione and markers of aging (glycine with N-acetylcysteine)
Small trials found mixed results: one found GlyNAC improved glutathione and strength in older adults, and a larger trial found no rise in glutathione.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 24 older adults, 16 weeks of glycine plus N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) against an alanine placebo improved glutathione deficiency, oxidative stress, mitochondrial function, insulin resistance, gait speed, strength and other measures [6]. In 114 healthy older adults given 2.4, 4.8 or 7.2 g a day for 2 weeks, GlyNAC did not raise the glutathione ratio (12.65 vs 12.49 with placebo, p = 0.739) or total glutathione (p = 0.278), the primary endpoint. A post hoc subgroup with high oxidative stress and low baseline glutathione showed increased glutathione [7].
- Population
- 24 older and 12 young adults [6]. 114 healthy older adults [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- These test a combination, not glycine alone. The two trials disagree. Six authors of the larger trial were Nestlé employees, and Nestlé Health Science holds patents and markets GlyNAC products [7].
Long COVID
Mixed results: a 40-session sham-controlled trial found better cognition, energy and sleep scores in long COVID, and a 10-session trial found no difference from sham.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 73 patients with symptoms at least 3 months after infection, 40 daily sessions improved global cognitive function (d = 0.495, p = 0.038), attention, executive function, energy (d = 0.522), sleep, psychiatric symptoms and pain interference compared with sham [12]. In 80 patients, 10 sessions at 2.4 bar over 6 weeks did not differ from sham at 13 weeks in physical functioning (difference 0.63, 95% CI -7.04 to 8.29) or role limitations due to physical health (difference 2.35, 95% CI -5.95 to 10.66). Both groups improved [13].
- Population
- 73 adults, 37 treated and 36 sham [12]. 80 previously healthy adults aged 18 to 60, 40 per group [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- The trials differ fourfold in the number of sessions and in their outcome measures. Outcomes in the positive trial were assessed 1 to 3 weeks after the last session [12].
Weight loss
Mixed results: a 2009 review found one weak supporting study for obesity, while fat mass rose in the sauna group of a 6-week study in female athletes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The review described the evidence for obesity as weak and resting on one study [14]. In 40 female athletes training for 6 weeks, body mass and fat mass increased in the group using a post-training infrared sauna, with a group by time interaction for fat mass (p = 0.036) in one statistical model. Body mass rose from 64.8 to 65.7 kg in the sauna group [23].
- Population
- 9 papers reviewed [14]. 40 female team sport athletes [23].
- Sources
- [14], [23]
- Caveats
- The review abstract gives no numbers for the obesity study. The athlete study was pair-matched, in lean young women who were not trying to lose weight [23]. No randomized trial of infrared sauna for weight loss was located.
Sweating out pesticides
Limited evidence: insecticide breakdown products were detected in the sweat of 10 women during infrared sauna. No health outcome was measured.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Organophosphate metabolites were detected in 84.6% (22 of 26) and pyrethroid metabolites in 26.9% (7 of 26) of pooled sweat samples. Urinary concentrations of 3 of 4 metabolites rose marginally after infrared sauna. No definite correlation between sweat and urine levels was shown [30].
- Population
- 10 women in a single-blinded crossover of rest, infrared sauna and indoor cycling, 85 sweat and urine collections [30].
- Sources
- [30]
- Caveats
- A pilot that shows these compounds can be found in sweat. It did not measure body stores before and after, or any health effect.
Exercise performance, IV fluids against drinking
Small crossover trials disagreed: one found IV rehydration sped a 40 km cycling time trial by 3.5% against drinking, and another found drinking gave a faster time trial.
Compared with drinking fluids, sports drink and water [5]; drinking water [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After dehydration by 4% of body weight, rehydrating half with IV saline cut 40 km time trial time by 3.5% against oral rehydration, and oral glycerol by 3.7%. Combining IV fluid with oral glycerol restored the most plasma volume and did not improve performance over either alone [5]. During 90 minutes of cycling in 35°C heat, 25 mL of saline infused every 5 minutes left people thirstier and hotter, with a slower 12 km time trial (19.6 minutes) than drinking 25 mL of water every 5 minutes (17.7 minutes, P = 0.05) [6].
- Population
- 9 endurance-trained men [5]. Recreationally active men, mean age 29, number not given in the abstract [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Two small crossover trials with different designs. Neither tested recovery on the following days.
Longevity and diseases of aging
Limited evidence: observational studies disagree on mortality, and in a long trial follow-up, cancer and multiple chronic conditions did not differ from placebo in prediabetes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 53 studies found people with diabetes on metformin had lower all-cause mortality than people without diabetes (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99) and than people with diabetes on other drugs (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.80) [8]. A Danish registry study found the reverse. People starting metformin alone for type 2 diabetes had higher mortality than matched people without diabetes (adjusted IRR 1.32, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.50), and 1.64 (95% CI 1.10 to 2.46) against their own twin without diabetes [9]. In adults with prediabetes randomized in the Diabetes Prevention Program, cancer incidence did not differ between metformin and placebo over a median 21 years (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.10) [10], nor did the risk of having two or more chronic conditions (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.07) [11]. In a trial in metabolic syndrome, fewer major noncommunicable diseases on metformin were fully explained by less diabetes [3].
- Population
- Observational studies of people with type 2 diabetes [8][9], including discordant twin pairs [9]; 3,234 adults with prediabetes followed a median 21 years [10]; 1,173 of them with Medicare records [11]; 1,442 adults with metabolic syndrome [3].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10], [11], [3]
- Caveats
- [8] and [9] are not randomized trials. The meta-analysis authors note baseline differences between groups that could bias results [8]. In the Diabetes Prevention Program follow-ups, metformin became open-label and use outside the study rose over time [10], and [11] is an observational follow-up of the trial cohort. No trial in people without diabetes measuring lifespan was sourced.
Biological aging markers
One trial found slower change in two of five DNA methylation clocks over 2 years. The authors state the clinical relevance is not known.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 2 years, a daily multivitamin slowed yearly change in two DNA methylation clocks against placebo, by 0.113 years for PCGrimAge (95% CI -0.205 to -0.020) and 0.214 years for PCPhenoAge (95% CI -0.410 to -0.019). The effect on PCGrimAge was larger in people with faster biological aging at baseline [12].
- Population
- 958 COSMOS participants (482 women, 476 men) [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Five clocks were tested and two changed. The authors state that the clinical relevance of these changes is not known [12].
Growth hormone
Limited evidence: growth hormone rose 16-fold in 10 men during a week of twice-daily one-hour saunas, and the response declined after the third day.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 10 healthy men exposed to an 80°C sauna for 1 hour twice a day for 7 days, serum growth hormone rose 16-fold and prolactin 2.3-fold (P < 0.01). The growth hormone response declined after the third day. Cortisol and ACTH fell slightly by the end [28].
- Population
- 10 healthy men, with 7 women taking part in prolactin measurements only [28].
- Sources
- [28]
- Caveats
- One 1986 study with no control group. Two hours a day at 80°C is far longer than the sessions in other studies here. No muscle, recovery or body composition outcome was measured. The authors suggest dehydration may explain the hormone release.
Sweating out heavy metals
Limited evidence: arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury have been measured in sweat, and the reviewers call for properly sized trials before conclusions about lowering body levels.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 24 studies found that in people with higher exposure, sweat concentrations of these metals generally exceeded plasma or urine concentrations. Populations, collection methods and concentrations varied widely. The one sauna finding named in the abstract is a case report in which mercury levels normalized with repeated saunas [34].
- Population
- People with and without known metal exposure in 24 studies of sweat [34].
- Sources
- [34]
- Caveats
- The studies measured what is in sweat. None in the abstract measured a health outcome, and the authors state that appropriately sized trials are needed [34].
Cancer
Limited evidence: one Australian cohort linked higher serum iron to more cancer in women and to less cancer in men.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In women, higher serum iron had a hazard ratio of 1.83 (95% CI 1.21 to 2.76) for a new cancer other than skin cancer and 2.45 (1.12 to 5.34) for breast cancer. In men, higher serum iron had a hazard ratio of 0.65 (0.42 to 0.99) for a new cancer other than skin cancer and 0.34 (0.12 to 0.95) for colorectal cancer. Ferritin was not associated with cancer risk or cancer death [9].
- Population
- 1,597 men and 1,795 women aged 25 to 79 in the Busselton Health Survey, without cancer at the start and with ferritin of 20 ng/mL or above, followed from 1994 or 1995 to 2010 [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort, with opposite directions in women and men. The abstract does not state which serum iron levels were compared, and the authors call the basis for the sex difference unclear [9].
Mitochondrial and cellular markers
Small trials found changes in mitochondrial and inflammation blood markers in middle-aged and older adults. All were run or funded by the maker.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Four weeks at 500 or 1,000 mg a day changed plasma acylcarnitines and muscle mitochondrial gene expression in older adults [4]. Acylcarnitines, ceramides and CRP fell more than on placebo in older adults over 4 months [3], and acylcarnitines and CRP fell in middle-aged adults [2].
- Population
- Healthy, sedentary older adults [4]; 66 older adults [3]; middle-aged adults [2].
- Sources
- [4], [3], [2]
- Caveats
- These are markers, not health outcomes. All three trials were run or funded by the maker.
Weight and abdominal fat
Mixed results: body mass and waist fell after 20 sessions in an uncontrolled study of 37 women, and a scoping review of 8 studies reached no definitive conclusion.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A scoping review of 8 studies in people with obesity described cryotherapy as a promising add-on for abdominal obesity and body mass, and stated that the data fail to reach definitive conclusions [21]. In 19 women with metabolic syndrome and 18 healthy women, body mass, body mass index, waist circumference and total fat mass decreased significantly after 20 daily sessions of 3 minutes at -130°C [22].
- Population
- 8 studies in people with obesity [21]. 37 postmenopausal women with a mean age of about 61 [22].
- Sources
- [21], [22]
- Caveats
- The study of women had no untreated group, and its abstract gives no amounts lost [22].
Energy expenditure, Apple Watch Series 6, Garmin Fenix 6 and Huawei Watch GT 2e
Mixed results: one study of 20 adults found calorie errors of 10 to 32% for walking and 12 to 24% for running across three watches.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 6, Garmin Fenix 6, Huawei Watch GT 2e
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry with a COSMED K5 portable system
- Effect
- For walking 2 km at 6 km/h, mean absolute percentage error was 19.8% for Apple Watch, 32.0% for Garmin and 9.9% for Huawei, with intraclass correlations of 0.821, 0.216 and 0.760. For running 2 km at 10 km/h, error was 24.4%, 21.8% and 11.9%. The Apple and Garmin watches read significantly higher than calorimetry in both tests, and the Huawei watch did not differ. The authors described validity as moderate [15].
- Population
- 20 young normal-weight Chinese adults on an outdoor 400 meter track [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- Twenty participants and two fixed speeds [15].
Not shown to help55
Body composition, physical performance and quality of life in trials that raised DHEA-S
Not shown to change body composition, physical performance, sexual function or quality of life in a meaningful way when DHEA-S was raised with DHEA in older adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a 2-year trial in older adults with low DHEA-S, DHEA raised the level by a median of 3.4 µg/mL in men and 3.8 µg/mL in women, which is 340 and 380 µg/dL. It had no significant effect on body composition, and did not change peak oxygen consumption, muscle strength, insulin sensitivity or quality of life. Bone density rose at the femoral neck in men and at the ultradistal radius in women [8]. Across 25 trials in older men, DHEA reduced fat mass slightly (standardized mean difference -0.35, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.05), an effect that disappeared after adjusting for the rise in testosterone and estradiol, with no effect on blood lipids, blood sugar, bone, sexual function or quality of life [9]. A review of 8 trials called the effect on muscle strength and physical function inconclusive [10]. In postmenopausal women, 23 trials found no significant improvement in libido or sexual function (0.35, -0.02 to 0.73) and no significant effect on lipids, glucose, weight or bone density [11]. A Cochrane review found no improvement in quality of life (0.16, -0.03 to 0.34) and more androgenic side effects, mainly acne (odds ratio 3.77, 1.36 to 10.4) [12].
- Population
- 87 older men and 57 older women with low DHEA-S, treated for 2 years [8]. 1,353 older men in 25 trials, mean follow-up 36 weeks [9]. 661 adults aged 50 or older in 8 trials [10]. 1,188 postmenopausal women in 23 trials [11]. 1,273 women in 28 trials [12].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]
- Caveats
- A marker that tracks an outcome is not always one whose correction changes it. Low DHEA-S went with more deaths in cohorts. The trials measured body composition, function and quality of life, not deaths. The reviewers of the trials in women rated confidence in the evidence as low [11].
Endurance performance with training guided by daily readings
Not shown to improve endurance performance or VO2 max more than a fixed training plan in two meta-analyses of small trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 8 studies, training adjusted to daily heart rate variability had no significant effect over predefined training on performance (g = 0.079, p = 0.597) or peak oxygen uptake (g = 0.171, p = 0.130), and a significant effect on submaximal physiological measures (g = 0.296, 95% CI 0.031 to 0.562). Most guided programs included fewer moderate or high intensity sessions [22]. A second meta-analysis found small, non-significant differences for maximal aerobic capacity (SMD 0.20, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.47) and endurance performance (SMD 0.20, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.48) [23].
- Population
- 198 participants in 8 studies [22]. Trials of endurance training, the longest lasting 8 weeks [23].
- Sources
- [22], [23]
- Caveats
- Small trials using a range of recording devices and decision rules. One review reported fewer non-responders with guided training [22]. Its authors concluded that any advantage for group-level fitness or performance is by a small margin [23].
Any condition, national and expert evidence reviews
Not shown to treat any health condition beyond placebo, in Australia's 2015 review of 57 systematic reviews and in UK parliamentary and European academy assessments.
Compared with placebo or other treatments [3][4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) assessed 57 systematic reviews on 68 health conditions and concluded that "there are no health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective" [4][3]. The UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2010) wrote: "In our view, the systematic reviews and meta-analysis conclusively demonstrate that homeopathic products perform no better than placebo" [3]. The European Academies' Science Advisory Council (2017) agreed "that there are no known diseases for which there is robust, reproducible evidence that homeopathy is effective beyond the placebo effect" [3]. NCCIH reports the Australian conclusion and finds little evidence for any specific condition [1].
- Population
- 57 systematic reviews including 176 studies, compared with placebo or other treatments [4]. Trials across many conditions, among them rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, anxiety, depression, ADHD in children, malaria and stroke [3].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [1]
- Caveats
- The NHMRC and Commons committee pages could not be opened for this file. Their wording is quoted from the EASAC statement [3] and a 2020 review [4]. Some conditions in the Australian review rested on a single study [3].
Any medical condition, systematic reviews
Not shown to treat any medical condition in two reviews of randomized trials, where most higher-quality trials found no benefit.
Compared with control conditions in randomized trials, which the source abstracts do not describe [2][3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2009 review of 18 trials in conditions from asthma and back pain to cancer, menopause and multiple sclerosis found five with positive results, and most higher-quality trials were negative [2]. Its 2011 update of 23 trials found nine high-quality trials with negative findings and five with positive findings, and concluded that "the best clinical evidence does not demonstrate convincingly reflexology to be an effective treatment for any medical condition" [3].
- Population
- 18 trials of reflexology given by trained reflexologists [2]. 23 trials across a wide range of conditions [3].
- Sources
- [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The update shares its lead author and many trials with the earlier review. Trial quality was often poor and samples small [2][3].
Cancer prevention
Not shown to lower cancer rates, including prostate, colorectal, lung and bladder cancer, in large trials. Low-bias trials suggested more melanoma.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In low-bias RCTs, selenium did not change cancer incidence (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.10, 3 studies, 19,475 people). Prostate (RR 1.01), colorectal (RR 0.99), lung (RR 1.16) and bladder cancer did not differ either. Low-bias trials suggested more melanoma [1]. In SELECT, prostate cancer did not significantly differ on selenium (HR 1.09, 99% CI 0.93 to 1.27) [2].
- Population
- 10 RCTs with 27,232 participants [1]; 34,887 men in SELECT [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane authors graded the evidence high certainty for most sites. In SELECT, men with the highest baseline selenium had more high-grade prostate cancer on supplements [1].
Symptoms and quality of life in trials that lowered a mildly raised TSH
Not shown to improve quality of life or thyroid symptoms when levothyroxine lowered TSH into range in 21 trials of adults with subclinical hypothyroidism.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a trial of 737 adults aged 65 and older with TSH of 4.60 to 19.99 mIU/L, levothyroxine left TSH at 3.63 mIU/L at 1 year against 5.48 on placebo. The Hypothyroid Symptoms score did not differ (between-group difference 0.0, 95% CI -2.0 to 2.1), nor did the Tiredness score (0.4, -2.1 to 2.9) [24]. Across 21 trials, thyroid hormone brought mean TSH to 0.5 to 3.7 mIU/L against 4.6 to 14.7 mIU/L on placebo, with no benefit for general quality of life (standardized mean difference -0.11, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.03) or thyroid-related symptoms (0.01, -0.12 to 0.14) [25]. A guideline panel that reviewed the same trials issued a strong recommendation against thyroid hormones for adults with subclinical hypothyroidism, and stated that it does not apply to women trying to become pregnant or to people with TSH above 20 mIU/L [26].
- Population
- 737 adults, mean age 74.4, mean baseline TSH 6.40 mIU/L [24]. 2,192 nonpregnant adults in 21 randomized trials lasting 3 to 18 months [25].
- Sources
- [24], [25], [26]
- Caveats
- A marker that tracks an outcome is not always one whose correction changes it. The pooled trials lasted 3 to 18 months. The guideline panel judged effects on cardiovascular events and deaths to be uncertain, measured in one trial with few events [26].
Energy expenditure, wrist and arm devices pooled
Not shown to match laboratory measures of energy expenditure in pooled reviews, with errors that ranged from 21% under to 15% over and varied by activity.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Wrist-worn and arm-worn activity monitors pooled [17]. Consumer wearables pooled across systematic reviews [9]. Nine commercial brands [10].
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry, room calorimeters and doubly labeled water
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 60 studies and 104 effect sizes found accuracy varied by activity type, with large heterogeneity for many devices (I² above 75%). Adding heart rate or heat sensing to motion sensing reduced error in most activity types [17]. An umbrella review reported that wearables mostly underestimated energy expenditure, with a mean bias of -3% and error ranging from -21.27% to 14.76% [9]. A systematic review of 158 publications concluded that for energy expenditure "no brand was accurate" [10].
- Population
- Healthy adults in 60 studies [17]. 24 systematic reviews [9]. 158 publications up to May 2019 [10].
- Sources
- [17], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Each maker uses its own undisclosed formula, and reviews pool device generations. One abstract reports no pooled error figure [17].
Endurance exercise performance
Not shown to change endurance performance overall in 10 crossover trials, with small gains in time-to-exhaustion tests and when taken 45 to 60 minutes before exercise.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pooling 10 randomized, double-blind crossover studies, endurance performance did not differ between paracetamol and placebo (Cohen's d 0.09, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.22). A small effect appeared in studies that gave it 45 to 60 minutes before exercise (d 0.14, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.21) and in time-to-exhaustion tests (d 0.19, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.33), and none in time trials (d 0.05, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.21) [16]. In one of the trials, 13 trained male cyclists finished a 10-mile time trial in 26 min 15 s on acetaminophen and 26 min 45 s on placebo, at a mean power of 265 against 255 W [17].
- Population
- 141 participants in 10 crossover studies [16]; 13 trained male cyclists [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Small studies of single doses. The subgroup results come from fewer studies than the main analysis [16].
Raising albumin by infusion
Not shown to lower deaths: two trials that raised albumin to 3.0 g/dL or more by infusion, in sepsis and in cirrhosis, found no benefit.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In severe sepsis, albumin infusion to a target of 30 g/L (3.0 g/dL) or more did not change death at 28 days (31.8% against 32.0% with crystalloid alone, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.14) or at 90 days (41.1% against 43.6%, RR 0.94, 0.85 to 1.05) [11]. In hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis and albumin below 30 g/L, infusions that raised albumin to 30 g/L or more did not change a composite of new infection, kidney dysfunction or death (29.7% against 30.2% with standard care, adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.33), and more severe or life-threatening serious adverse events occurred in the albumin group [12]. An earlier meta-analysis of 9 controlled trials of correcting low albumin was inconclusive [8].
- Population
- 1,818 patients with severe sepsis in 100 intensive care units [11]. 777 hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis [12]. 535 patients in 9 trials [8].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [8]
- Caveats
- Both large trials were open-label and enrolled people who were seriously ill, so they do not address albumin that is low for other reasons [11][12].
Death from any cause
Not linked to death from any cause in a meta-analysis of general population cohorts, where the pooled estimate had a wide interval.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 19 cohort studies of liver enzymes, the authors found no strong evidence of an association of AST with death from any cause. The relative risk comparing the top and bottom thirds of baseline AST was 1.23 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.88) [6].
- Population
- Over 9.24 million participants and 242,953 deaths across the 19 cohorts, which also covered other liver enzymes. The abstract does not give the number of studies that measured AST [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Observational. The interval runs from 20% lower to 88% higher risk, so a moderate association in either direction is not ruled out [6].
Death from any cause
Not shown to lower deaths across pooled placebo-controlled trials of bisphosphonates or of zoledronate alone.
Compared with placebo [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Bisphosphonate trials showed no significant association with overall mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.04), nor did zoledronate trials (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.13), with some heterogeneity among the zoledronate trials (I² 48.2%) [8].
- Population
- 42,867 people in 21 bisphosphonate trials, 13,870 of them in 6 zoledronate trials [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Trials were designed around fractures, not deaths. One zoledronic acid trial after hip fracture found fewer deaths [7].
Pain
Not shown to relieve pain more than placebo in 15 of 16 trials of pharmaceutical-grade CBD across 12 pain conditions.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2024 review found 16 randomized trials of pharmaceutical-grade CBD with pain as an outcome, across 12 pain conditions, at 6 to 1,600 mg and from a single dose to 12 weeks. Fifteen of the 16 showed no benefit of CBD over placebo [7].
- Population
- Adults with a range of pain conditions [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The review is not a pooled meta-analysis [7].
43 more
Infant colic, when parents did not know the treatment
Not shown to reduce infant crying when parents did not know whether their baby had been treated, and not shown to differ from sham in a systematic review.
Compared with control conditions with parents blinded [11]; sham interventions [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In trials at low risk of performance bias, where parents were blinded, crying did not fall significantly (mean difference -0.57 hours a day, 95% CI -2.24 to 1.09) [11]. A systematic review of high- and acceptable-quality trials found manipulation was not superior to sham for infantile colic [10]. A second review rated the evidence for gentle mobilization in colic very low and the effect uncertain [12].
- Population
- Infants in 2 trials with parents blinded [11]. Trials of infantile colic among 6 trials of non-spine conditions [10]. 26 studies of manual therapy in infants, children and adolescents [12].
- Sources
- [11], [10], [12]
- Caveats
- Few small trials. The two reviews of sham-controlled and blinded trials agree with each other and differ from the pooled result of all trials [10][11].
Quality of life and menopause symptoms
Not shown to improve quality of life in menopausal women or in older adults over 2 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In menopausal women, DHEA did not improve quality of life (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.34, 8 studies, 287 women). Effects on menopausal symptoms were unclear because trials measured them in ways that could not be pooled [5]. In older men and women over 2 years, quality of life did not change [3].
- Population
- Peri- and postmenopausal women in 28 trials (1,273 women) [5]; 144 elderly adults [3].
- Sources
- [3], [5]
- Caveats
- Quality of life evidence was rated moderate quality [5].
Ezetimibe: death from any cause
Not shown to lower deaths from any cause or from heart disease when ezetimibe was added to a statin or fenofibrate.
Compared with a statin or fenofibrate alone [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- All-cause mortality did not differ (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.05), nor did cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.12) [3].
- Population
- 21,222 people in 8 trials for all-cause and 19,457 in 6 trials for cardiovascular mortality [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Trials ran a median of up to 6 years.
Cancer in trials of folic acid
Not shown to change cancer incidence in trials: folic acid quadrupled plasma folate and cancer rates did not differ significantly over 5 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 13 trials, allocation to folic acid raised plasma folate to 57.3 nmol/L against 13.5 nmol/L on placebo (about 25.3 against 6.0 ng/mL). Overall cancer incidence did not differ significantly (1,904 cancers against 1,809, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.13), with no trend toward a greater effect with longer treatment and no significant effect on cancer of the large intestine, prostate, lung, breast or any other site [12].
- Population
- 49,621 participants in 13 trials, weighted average treatment 5.2 years [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- The trials used doses higher than those from fortification and ran for about 5 years, so they say little about longer exposure [12]. The ng/mL figures are converted here from the study's nmol/L.
Symptoms in trials that added T3 to thyroxine for hypothyroidism
Not shown to change pain, mood, fatigue, quality of life, weight or cholesterol when T3 was added to thyroxine in 11 trials of adults with hypothyroidism.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials found no difference between combined T4 and T3 treatment and T4 alone for bodily pain (standardized mean difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.35), depression (0.07, -0.20 to 0.34), anxiety (0.00, -0.12 to 0.11), fatigue (-0.12, -0.33 to 0.09) or quality of life (0.03, -0.09 to 0.15). Body weight and blood lipids did not differ, and adverse events did not differ between regimens [10].
- Population
- 1,216 adults with clinical hypothyroidism in 11 randomized trials [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The trials compared treatments in people already treated for hypothyroidism, and the abstract does not report the free T3 levels reached. Searches ran to September 2005 [10].
Pain after surgery
Not shown to reduce pain after surgery by a clinically meaningful amount: scores were 3 to 10 points lower on a 100-point scale across 281 trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Gabapentinoids given around surgery lowered pain intensity on a 100-point scale by 10 points at 6 hours, 9 at 12 hours, 7 at 24 hours and 3 at 48 hours, each below the 10-point threshold for a meaningful difference. There was no effect at 72 hours or on later chronic pain. Nausea and vomiting were less frequent, and dizziness and visual disturbance more frequent [18].
- Population
- 24,682 participants in 281 trials [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- Not an approved use. Results were the same for gabapentin and pregabalin.
Cancer
Not shown to lower cancer risk: a Cochrane review found inconsistent results and no link between green tea drinking and cancer death.
Compared with the lowest intake [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At the highest against the lowest intake, overall cancer incidence was 0.83 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.07) in 3 studies and cancer death 0.99 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.07) in 8 studies, both low-certainty. Cohort and case-control studies conflicted for esophageal, prostate and urinary tract cancer and leukemia, with higher risk in cohorts [9].
- Population
- More than 1,100,000 participants in 46 cohort and 85 case-control studies, and 1,795 in 11 trials of green tea extract [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Most studies were in Asian populations with high green tea intake [9].
Chronic pain across conditions
Not shown to improve pain or quality of life across chronic pain conditions, with less pain than placebo only in fibromyalgia in one analysis.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 7 RCTs, pain response did not differ from control overall (d -0.11, 95% CI -0.96 to 0.74). Against placebo in fibromyalgia, pain was lower (d -0.34, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.06). Against active drugs, there was no difference [6]. A systematic review of 7 RCTs (406 patients) at 2 to 4.5 mg a day found no improvement in pain or quality of life across chronic pain conditions [7]. In 23 people with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis, 8 weeks of 4.5 mg did not change pain interference (-23 points against -22 on placebo, p 0.90), pain severity or fatigue [8].
- Population
- Adults with chronic pain conditions, including fibromyalgia [6][7], and 17 people with osteoarthritis and 6 with inflammatory arthritis [8].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The arthritis trial was a pilot too small to rule out a modest effect [8].
Long-term mortality
Not shown to change death from any cause over 18 years in postmenopausal women, 27.1% against 27.6% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 18 years of cumulative follow-up, all-cause mortality was 27.1% with hormone therapy and 27.6% with placebo (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.03). Cardiovascular mortality HR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.08) and cancer mortality 1.03 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.12). During the treatment phase, the HR for all-cause mortality in women aged 50 to 59 relative to women aged 70 to 79 was 0.61 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.87) [7].
- Population
- 27,347 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 in both WHI trials, treated a median of 5.6 or 7.2 years [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Post-treatment follow-up was observational. The age comparison is a ratio of nominal hazard ratios.
Death from any cause
Not shown to lower death from any cause in two large trials of older adults. In three US cohorts, daily users had about 4% higher mortality early in follow-up.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- All-cause mortality did not change in the Physicians' Health Study II (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.02) [1] or COSMOS (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.08) [2]. In 390,124 adults from 3 US cohorts followed up to 27 years, daily multivitamin users had slightly higher mortality than nonusers in the first half of follow-up (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.07), and the second half gave the same estimate with an interval that includes no difference (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.08) [6].
- Population
- Trial participants [1][2]; adults without chronic disease at baseline in NIH-AARP, PLCO and the Agricultural Health Study [6].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [6]
- Caveats
- The cohort data are observational, and a 4% difference is within the reach of confounding. Daily users were more often female and college educated and less often current smokers [6]. The cohort's authors state their conclusion as no mortality benefit [6].
Cancer pain, compared with morphine
Not shown to differ from morphine in the share of people with cancer pain relieved, with less constipation on controlled-release oxycodone.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 13 studies, the share with complete or significant pain relief did not differ between controlled-release oxycodone and controlled-release morphine (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.10). Pain intensity was slightly lower on morphine (SMD 0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.27), equal to 0.27 points on a 0 to 10 scale. Constipation was less frequent on oxycodone (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86). Controlled-release and immediate-release oxycodone did not differ in pain intensity [13].
- Population
- 4,485 participants with cancer pain in 42 studies [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- No placebo-controlled comparison. The reviewers rated the certainty low or very low [13].
Any condition, systematic reviews
Not shown to treat any condition in a review of nine trials. A Cochrane review found too few data to judge Reiki for anxiety or depression.
Compared with sham Reiki and conventional care [5]; control conditions in three trials, which the source abstract does not describe [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Of nine trials, two suggested benefit over sham for depression and one did not report group differences. There was no difference from sham for stroke recovery, for anxiety in women having amniocentesis, or for pain in diabetic nerve pain, and no effect on anxiety or depression against conventional care in women having breast biopsy. The reviewers found the evidence insufficient for any condition [5]. A Cochrane review found three trials with only 25 people with anxiety and 17 with depression, and no evidence that Reiki is either beneficial or harmful for them [6]. NCCIH states that "Reiki hasn't been clearly shown to be effective for any health-related purpose" [1].
- Population
- 9 randomized trials [5]. 3 trials in adults aged 16 or over [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [1]
- Caveats
- Trials were small, rarely replicated and often poorly reported [5][6].
Heart attack, stroke and mortality
Not shown to lower death, heart attack, stroke or other cardiovascular events in people, with events mostly from two US trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Selenium did not change death from any cause (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.08), cardiovascular death (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.2) or all cardiovascular events (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.11) [3]. A Cochrane review of antioxidants found no effect of selenium on mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.03, 17 trials) [4].
- Population
- 12 trials with 19,715 people, mostly the US SELECT and NPC trials [3]; 17 low-bias selenium trials [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Clinical events came mostly from two US trials [3].
Cancer prevention
Not shown to lower cancer rates or cancer deaths with beta-carotene in adults. Pooled trials found more bladder cancer.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 6 trials, beta-carotene did not change cancer incidence (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.18) or cancer death (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15) [3]. Over 12 years, cancer occurred in 1,273 physicians on beta-carotene and 1,293 on placebo (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.06) [4].
- Population
- 40,544 participants in 6 trials [3]; 22,071 US male physicians aged 40 to 84 [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- In the pooled trials, bladder cancer was higher on beta-carotene (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.24) [3]. Lung cancer in smokers is under Risks.
Growth and thinking in children
Not shown to improve thinking or growth in children. B12 alone lowered B12 deficiency, 1.8% against 7.6% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- B12 alone against placebo made little to no difference to cognitive function such as attention (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.28, 2 trials, 438 children) or height (MD -0.19 cm, 95% CI -2.44 to 2.06). It lowered B12 deficiency, 1.8% against 7.6% (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.69, 3 trials, 642 children). Added to other micronutrients, B12 made little to no difference to cognitive function (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.13, 3 trials, 956 children) or development (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.08) [7].
- Population
- 16 trials with 4,083 children aged 2 days to 11 years in 10 countries, given 0.9 to 150 µg a day for 28 days to 31 months [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The authors rated growth and cognition evidence low certainty. Few trials reported these outcomes, and no trial of B12 alone reported adverse effects [7].
Cancer, cardiovascular disease and death
Not shown to lower cancer, cardiovascular disease or death in adults. Reviews disagree on cancer death, which one found about 16% lower.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In VITAL, invasive cancer did not differ (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.06), nor did major cardiovascular events (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.12) or death from any cause (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.12). Cancer death had HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.02) [18]. Across 52 trials (75,454 participants), all-cause mortality did not change (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.02) and cancer death fell (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95) [19]. Across 9 RCTs (114,379 participants), cardiovascular events (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.04), cardiovascular death (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.24) and heart attack (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.11) did not differ from placebo [20]. Across 5 RCTs (56,901 participants), melanoma incidence (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.24) and recurrence (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.29 to 5.18) did not differ [21]. In 455 people starting chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, 4,000 IU a day after a loading dose did not change progression-free survival against 400 IU a day (median 11.8 against 10.3 months, P 0.25) or overall survival (25.6 against 27.0 months) [22].
- Population
- 25,871 US adults over a median 5.3 years [18]; adults in 52 RCTs [19]; adults in 9 placebo-controlled RCTs [20]; adults in 5 RCTs, with or without calcium [21]; US adults with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer, median follow-up 20 months [22].
- Sources
- [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]
- Caveats
- The sources disagree on cancer death. VITAL's interval crossed 1.0 [18] and the pooled analysis did not [19]. Melanoma was a secondary endpoint in some trials and events were few [21].
Cancer prevention
Not shown to lower cancer in trials mostly of men. One large trial found more prostate cancer on vitamin E.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Prostate cancer did not fall. In SELECT, it rose on vitamin E (HR 1.17, 99% CI 1.004 to 1.36) [4]. In the Physicians' Health Study II, prostate cancer (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.09) and total cancer (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.13) did not differ [5]. In HOPE, cancer incidence (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.06) and cancer death did not differ [2].
- Population
- 34,887 men in SELECT [4]; 14,641 male physicians [5]; 9,541 people with vascular disease or diabetes [2].
- Sources
- [2], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Trials were mostly in men and used synthetic or natural alpha-tocopherol at 400 IU.
Body weight
Not shown to change body weight in pooled trials against non-whole-grain foods. Body fat was 0.48 percentage points lower.
Compared with non-whole-grain control foods [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Whole grain intake did not change body weight (0.06 kg, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.20) and lowered body fat percentage slightly (-0.48%, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.01). The whole grain dose did not predict the difference [13].
- Population
- 2,060 apparently healthy adults in 26 randomized trials of up to 16 weeks [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Trials were short, which the authors say may explain the lack of difference [13].
Energy expenditure, Apple Watch models pooled
Not shown to match reference energy expenditure. A systematic review found Apple Watch errors from 10% during running to 152% during walking across 8 studies.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch models pooled. Five of the eight studies tested Series 2 or older.
- Compared with
- Criterion measures of energy expenditure
- Effect
- Across 8 studies, mean absolute percentage error ranged from 9.71% during running to 151.66% during walking. All six studies that calculated it reported 20% or higher in at least one test condition. The authors described error for energy expenditure as inconsistent and frequently large, at rest and during exercise [3].
- Population
- 270 participants in 8 studies, 63% male, mostly young physically active adults [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Most of the evidence comes from early watch generations. No trend in error by exercise intensity was seen [3].
Energy expenditure, Fitbit models pooled
Not shown to match reference energy expenditure. A meta-analysis found Fitbit devices read 2.8 kcal per minute low on average, with wide limits of agreement.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Fitbit models that combine a heart rate sensor with a motion sensor, pooled
- Compared with
- Reference measures of energy expenditure
- Effect
- Across 29 comparisons, Fitbit devices underestimated energy expenditure by a mean 2.77 kcal per minute, with population limits of agreement from -12.75 to 7.41 kcal per minute. The authors concluded the energy expenditure measure "may be inaccurate for some research purposes" [6].
- Population
- 52 studies in the review, 41 in the meta-analysis [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Figures are after removing studies at high risk of bias. Models and firmware are pooled [6].
As a measure of nutrition
A US nutrition society position paper states albumin reflects inflammation and the risk of poor outcomes, not nutrition status or muscle mass.
The numbers and sources
- Compared with
- Nutrition status and protein-energy malnutrition
- Effect
- The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition states that albumin and prealbumin characterize inflammation and do not describe nutrition status or protein-energy malnutrition. In illness the liver reprioritizes protein synthesis and albumin moves out of the bloodstream as capillaries become more permeable, so serum levels fall. The paper states that there is an association between inflammation and malnutrition but not between malnutrition and these protein levels, and that the proteins correlate with risk of adverse outcomes [15].
- Population
- A position paper approved by the society's board of directors, drawing on published literature. It reports no new patient data [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- A position paper, not a study with a stated accuracy figure. Its conclusion matches the cohort finding above that the link between albumin and heart disease weakened after adjustment for an inflammation marker [10].
Healthy life span in adults over 70
One trial found daily aspirin did not lengthen survival free of dementia or disability in healthy adults aged 70 or over.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over a median 4.7 years, death, dementia or persistent physical disability occurred at 21.5 events per 1,000 person-years on aspirin 100 mg and 21.2 on placebo (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.11). Major hemorrhage occurred in 3.8% against 2.8% (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.62) [16].
- Population
- 19,114 community-dwelling adults in Australia and the US, median age 74, without cardiovascular disease, dementia or disability [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- The trial was stopped at a median 4.7 years. Adherence was about 62% in the final year [16].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 19,114 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Surgery for mildly raised calcium from an overactive parathyroid
One trial found parathyroid surgery did not reduce deaths, fractures, heart events or kidney stones over 10 years in mild primary hyperparathyroidism.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people with mild primary hyperparathyroidism and modest hypercalcemia, 15 had died 10 years after randomization, 8 assigned to surgery and 7 to observation. Over an extended period to 2018 there were 44 deaths, 24 and 20. Cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events, cancer, peripheral fractures and kidney stones numbered 52 in the surgery group and 49 in the observation group. Vertebral fractures occurred in 7 patients in each group [7].
- Population
- 191 patients at 8 Scandinavian centers, 95 assigned to parathyroidectomy and 96 to observation [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One trial of 191 people, and 50 withdrew during the study. It enrolled mild disease without known complications, and the abstract does not report calcium levels after surgery [7].
Fatigue
Limited evidence: 2 trials in people with depression found no difference in fatigue from control.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 2 trials in people with depression, fatigue did not differ from control (SMD -0.33, 95% CI -1.38 to 0.72, I² 89%) [20].
- Population
- Patients with depression, alone or with multiple sclerosis, breast cancer or polycystic ovary syndrome [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- Two trials with high heterogeneity. No review of fatigue in healthy people was located.
Death in older adults with normal thyroid tests
One cohort found no link between free T3 and death over 9 years in adults aged 65 and older whose thyroid tests were all in range.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among 815 adults aged 65 and older with TSH, free T3 and free T4 all in the normal range, 181 died over 9 years. Neither free T3 nor free T4 quartile was associated with death from any cause. TSH in the lowest quartile was, with a hazard ratio of 2.22 (95% CI 1.19 to 4.22) against the highest quartile [7].
- Population
- 815 community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older in the Invecchiare in Chianti study in Italy [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort with 181 deaths, limited to people whose results were inside the reference ranges [7].
Cortisol and stress response
One study found morning cortisol rose after the first post-exercise infrared sauna in female athletes, a response that had disappeared after 6 weeks of regular use.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Salivary cortisol rose by 5.1 ± 8.6 nmol/L the morning after the first session in the sauna group (p = 0.017) and not in controls. Heart rate after the session was 61 against 55 beats a minute. In the sixth week the cortisol change was -1.8 ± 7.6 nmol/L [22].
- Population
- 40 female team sport athletes, pair-matched, using 10 minutes at 50°C after training [22].
- Sources
- [22]
- Caveats
- One study. Cortisol was measured around two exercise sessions, not as a measure of everyday stress.
Longevity and heart disease
Limited evidence: no pooled trial measured deaths, heart attacks or strokes, and cohort studies linked eating windows of 8 hours or less to more cardiovascular deaths.
Compared with no trial reported these outcomes [5]; US adults whose eating window was 12 to 14 hours [14]; US adults with other eating windows [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of 18 pooled trials with 1,125 participants found no data on all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stroke, heart attack or heart failure [5]. In US survey cohorts, eating windows under 8 hours were linked to higher cardiovascular death against 12 to 14 hours [14], and mortality was lowest at about 11 to 12 hours a day [15]. These cohort results appear under Risks.
- Population
- Trials of 4 weeks to 6 months [5]; observational cohorts of 19,831 and 33,052 US adults [14][15].
- Sources
- [5], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- The cohorts measured habitual eating duration from two 24-hour diet recalls, not a chosen fasting plan [14][15].
Fibromyalgia, Myers' cocktail
One small trial found weekly Myers' cocktail drips did not differ from a saline-type drip on any fibromyalgia measure at 8 or 16 weeks.
Compared with weekly infusions of lactated Ringer's solution [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- No outcome differed between groups at 8 or 16 weeks: tender points, global pain, physical function, depression or quality of life. Both groups improved from baseline. The Myers' cocktail group improved in tender points, pain, depression and quality of life, and the placebo group in tender points only. One minor adverse event occurred in the treatment group [4].
- Population
- 34 adults with fibromyalgia in Connecticut, treated weekly for 8 weeks [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- A pilot study. The authors note a high placebo response and a sample too small to show a difference [4].
Cancer
One large trial of a diet drawn from macrobiotic and Mediterranean traditions found no fewer breast cancer recurrences over 5 years. Other cancer evidence is case reports.
Compared with a control group given the 2007 American Institute for Cancer Research and World Cancer Research Fund cancer prevention recommendations, which the diet group also received [12]; expected survival rates, in case series [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 1,542 women with breast cancer at high risk of recurrence, 95 on the macro-Mediterranean diet and 98 controls had a recurrence over 5 years (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.40). Pooling both groups, women in the top third for dietary change had fewer recurrences than the bottom third (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.92) [12]. A review found that research on macrobiotics in cancer treatment consists of case reports, assembled case series and comparisons with expected survival, and called the evidence for or against it limited [13].
- Population
- 1,542 women with breast cancer, followed for 5 years [12]. Published case reports and case series of people with cancer [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- The trial diet combined macrobiotic and Mediterranean principles, so it is not the full macrobiotic diet [12]. The link with dietary change is an observational analysis that crosses the randomized groups [12]. The case series had no control groups [13].
Longevity
Limited evidence: in two large cohorts, adults who ate one meal a day had higher death rates than those who ate three meals a day.
Compared with people who ate three meals a day [5][6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 24,011 US adults aged 40 or older followed through 2015, eating one meal a day was linked to higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.64) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.65) than eating three meals a day [5]. In 148,438 South Korean adults aged 40 or older, the once-a-day group had higher all-cause and cancer mortality than the three-meals group, partly explained by waist size [6].
- Population
- 24,011 US adults in NHANES 1999 to 2014, 4,175 deaths [5]. 148,438 South Korean adults in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Observational. Meal pattern was reported once, by 24-hour recall [5] or food questionnaire [6], and people who eat one meal a day may differ in health, work or income. Illness can also cause people to eat less often. No trial has measured lifespan on one meal a day.
Death and illness in a trial of surgery for mild primary hyperparathyroidism
One trial found parathyroid surgery for mild primary hyperparathyroidism did not change deaths, fractures or cardiovascular events over 10 years compared with observation.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After 10 years, 8 patients had died in the surgery group and 7 in the observation group. Over the extended follow-up to 2018 there were 24 and 20 deaths. Cardiovascular events, strokes, cancer, peripheral fractures and kidney stones together numbered 52 in the surgery group and 49 in the observation group, and 7 patients in each group had vertebral fractures [15].
- Population
- 191 patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism at eight Scandinavian centers, 95 assigned to surgery and 96 to observation [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- One trial of 191 people, 50 of whom withdrew. It studied mild disease with modest high calcium and no known complications, so it does not describe more severe disease [15].
Healthspan measures in healthy older adults
Small trials found no change in visceral fat, cognition or physical performance in healthy older adults, with only scattered gains in subgroups.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 48 weeks, weekly rapamycin 5 mg or 10 mg did not change visceral fat on DXA, the primary outcome, against placebo (p = 0.942). Blood biomarkers stayed in normal ranges. Lean tissue mass and self-reported pain improved in women on 10 mg, and emotional well-being and general health scores improved on 5 mg. No other effects were significant [1]. In a pilot in adults aged 70 to 95, 8 weeks or more of rapamycin 1 mg daily did not change cognitive, physical performance or self-rated health measures, or glucose tolerance [2].
- Population
- Healthy adults in a decentralized 48-week trial [1]; 25 adults with mean age 80.5 [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The positive findings in [1] were in subgroups among many secondary outcomes. [1] used compounded rapamycin. Both trials were small.
Heart disease, cancer and death on diets lower in red meat
One trial in 48,835 women found a diet lower in red meat made little or no difference to death, heart disease or cancer, at low certainty.
Compared with diets higher in red meat [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The trial found little or no effect of lower red meat intake on all-cause death (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.03), cardiovascular death (HR 0.98), cardiovascular disease (HR 0.99), cancer death (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.01), colorectal cancer (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.20) or breast cancer (HR 0.97). The review found 12 eligible trials, most measuring only blood markers [3].
- Population
- 48,835 women in one randomized trial, within a review of 12 trials lasting at least 6 months [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- The difference in red meat between the groups was small. The reviewers rated certainty low to very low [3].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 48,835 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Alongside cancer treatment
Limited evidence: tumor response with reishi alongside chemotherapy or radiotherapy was not clearly better, and no trial recorded long-term survival.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 5 RCTs, patients given reishi alongside chemotherapy or radiotherapy were more likely to respond than those on chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.51). Reishi alone did not show the same response. CD3, CD4 and CD8 percentages rose by 3.91%, 3.05% and 2.02%, and four studies reported better quality of life. No trial recorded long-term survival [1].
- Population
- Patients with cancer [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Trial quality was generally unsatisfying and reporting inadequate. The reported interval for tumor response crosses 1 [1].
Longer life
Limited evidence: in older Italian adults, dietary resveratrol levels were not linked to death over 9 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 9 years, 268 of 783 older adults died. Deaths by quartile of urinary resveratrol metabolites, lowest to highest, were 34.4%, 31.6%, 33.5% and 37.4%. The lowest quartile had a hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.17) against the highest. Resveratrol levels were not associated with inflammatory markers, heart disease or cancer [11].
- Population
- 783 community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older in the Chianti region of Italy [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- An observational cohort of resveratrol from diet, not supplements. Doses from diet are far smaller than supplement doses.
Fat loss
One trial found no added fat loss when a sauna followed exercise for 8 weeks. Body mass lost during a sauna session was studied as fluid to be replaced.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Fat mass changed by -0.6 kg (95% CI -1.9 to 0.7, P = 0.339) with exercise plus sauna compared with exercise alone. Exercise alone lowered fat mass by 1.3 kg against control [3]. In 674 sedentary students, body mass lost over two 10-minute dry sauna sessions rose with body mass index, and the authors used it to estimate the fluid to be replaced [27].
- Population
- 47 sedentary adults over 8 weeks [3]. 326 women and 348 men aged 19 to 20 in a single visit [27].
- Sources
- [3], [27]
- Caveats
- Fat mass was a secondary outcome in a small trial [3]. The student study measured weight change across one visit, not body fat [27].
Energy and fatigue
Limited evidence: only one trial measured fatigue in people with normal B12, too few to pool.
The numbers and sources
Cancer
One trial found no change in total, prostate, colorectal or lung cancer over 8 years in male physicians.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Total cancer did not differ on vitamin C against placebo (17.6 and 17.5 per 1,000 person-years, HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10), nor did prostate, colorectal or lung cancer [11].
- Population
- The same 14,641 men, mean follow-up 8.0 years [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One trial, men only.
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 14,641 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Energy expenditure, Apple Watch 6, Fitbit Sense and Polar Vantage V
One study of 60 young adults found calorie estimates from three watches varied 13 to 30% from indirect calorimetry across five activities.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch 6, Fitbit Sense, Polar Vantage V
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry with a Metamax 3B portable system
- Effect
- The coefficient of variation for energy expenditure was 14.68 to 24.85% for Apple Watch 6, 16.54 to 25.78% for Polar Vantage V and 13.44 to 29.66% for Fitbit Sense across sitting, walking, running, resistance exercises and cycling [2].
- Population
- 60 healthy young adults (30 women), mean age 24.9 [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- Young, lean, healthy volunteers in a laboratory [2].
Energy expenditure, Apple Watch Series 4, Fitbit Versa, Garmin Fenix 5 and Polar Vantage V
One study of 25 adults found calorie estimates from four watches varied 8 to 35% from indirect calorimetry across sitting, walking and running.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 4, Fitbit Versa, Garmin Fenix 5, Polar Vantage V
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry
- Effect
- The coefficient of variation for energy expenditure was 13.5 to 27.1% for Apple Watch Series 4, 16.3 to 28.0% for Polar Vantage V, 15.9 to 34.5% for Garmin Fenix 5 and 8.0 to 32.3% for Fitbit Versa, depending on intensity. The authors concluded none of the four watches was suitable for monitoring energy expenditure at the intensities and durations tested [4].
- Population
- 25 adults, 5 minutes each of sitting, walking, running at four speeds and intermittent sprints [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Five minute bouts in a single session [4].
Energy expenditure, Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Sense 2, Garmin Forerunner 955 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
One study of 58 adults found three of four watches overestimated cycling calories by 22 to 69 kcal over a short session, with error rising with body fat.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Sense 2, Garmin Forerunner 955, Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry with a COSMED K5 system
- Effect
- Mean bias was 21.60 kcal for Apple (95% CI 11.59 to 31.60), 68.61 kcal for Garmin (95% CI 53.28 to 83.94), 56.76 kcal for Samsung (95% CI 45.11 to 68.41) and 3.14 kcal for Fitbit (95% CI -8.96 to 15.24). Error increased with body fat percentage across all four brands (p < .01). The authors concluded the watches substantially misestimated activity energy expenditure [16].
- Population
- 58 Hispanic adults with Fitzpatrick skin types III to V, in a 10 minute recumbent cycling protocol with 5 minutes of rest before and after [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- The non-significant Fitbit bias depended on device-specific outlier removal, and usable pairings ranged from 44 (Fitbit) to 52 (Apple). One short cycling session [16].
Energy expenditure, Apple Watch, Basis Peak, Fitbit Surge, Microsoft Band, Mio Alpha 2, PulseOn and Samsung Gear S2
One study of 60 adults found none of seven wrist devices estimated energy expenditure with error below 20%.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch, Basis Peak, Fitbit Surge, Microsoft Band, Mio Alpha 2, PulseOn, Samsung Gear S2
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry
- Effect
- No device achieved an error in energy expenditure below 20% across sitting, walking, running and cycling. Error was higher in men, at greater body mass index, with darker skin tone and while walking [5].
- Population
- 60 volunteers (31 women), mean age 38 [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- Published in 2017 with devices from that period [5].
Energy expenditure during resistance exercise, Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Charge 5, Garmin Vivosmart 5 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
One study of 70 men found calorie estimates from four watches barely tracked indirect calorimetry during a lifting session, with intraclass correlations of 0.02 to 0.03.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Charge 5, Garmin Vivosmart 5, Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry
- Effect
- Intraclass correlation between each watch's workout-session energy expenditure and indirect calorimetry was 0.021 to 0.033 across the four devices [14].
- Population
- 70 healthy men aged 20 to 39 performing four barbell exercises [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- Men only, one session [14].
Checked, no increase found28
Mortality
Deaths were about as common as on placebo across 29 low-bias trials of adults.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In trials with low risk of bias, vitamin C did not change mortality (9.9% against 9.3%, RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.07, 29 trials) [24].
- Population
- Adults in primary and secondary prevention trials [24].
- Sources
- [24]
- Caveats
- Antioxidants in these trials were given alone or in combination with other vitamins, minerals or interventions [24].
Adverse events in infants
Not shown to raise adverse events in infants: 7 mild events per 1,000 infants treated, against 110 per 1,000 untreated, in a review of manual therapy.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- Seven non-serious adverse events were reported per 1,000 infants given manual therapy (n = 1,308) and 110 per 1,000 among those not given it [10]. No trial in premature babies reported an adverse event linked to osteopathic treatment [14].
- Population
- 1,308 infants given manual therapy [10]. 1,306 premature babies [14].
- Sources
- [10], [14]
- Caveats
- The review pooled osteopathy with chiropractic and massage, and reporting of harms was inconsistent [10]. Serious harms after high-velocity spinal thrusts in infants are covered on the chiropractic page.
Serious adverse events overall
Not shown to raise serious adverse events against placebo in Cochrane reviews of alendronate, risedronate and bisphosphonates in men.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Serious adverse events were 29.2% on risedronate and placebo alike (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.07) [2]. On alendronate they did not differ in lower-risk women (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43) and were fewer in higher-risk women (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96) [1]. In men they were 27.2% against 28.6% (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.08) [9].
- Population
- 9,435 women in 6 risedronate trials [2]; alendronate trial populations [1]; 2,457 men in 6 trials [9].
- Sources
- [2], [1], [9]
- Caveats
- Trials were not large enough to catch rare harms such as atypical fractures.
Weight gain
Not shown to cause meaningful weight gain in women on combined methods in placebo-controlled trials. Progestin-only methods other than the injection showed limited change, usually under 2 kg.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Four trials with a placebo or no-intervention group found no evidence that combined pills or the patch cause weight change, and stopping for weight did not differ between groups [22]. Across 22 studies of progestin-only methods, groups mostly did not differ in weight, and mean gain at 6 or 12 months was under 2 kg in most studies. Greater gains were seen with the injection [23].
- Population
- 49 trials of combined methods [22]; 11,450 women in 22 studies [23].
- Sources
- [22], [23]
- Caveats
- Low-quality evidence for progestin-only methods [23]. The injection is not covered on this page.
Serious adverse events overall
Not shown to raise serious adverse events against placebo in kidney disease and heart failure trials, 46% against 44% in one and 20% against 15% in another.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Serious adverse events were reported in 46% on allopurinol and 44% on placebo in the chronic kidney disease trial [9], and in 20% against 15% in the heart failure trial (p = 0.36) [12]. In two gout trials, serious adverse events occurred in 2% against 1% on placebo (RR 1.93, 95% CI 0.48 to 7.80) [1]. The frequency was similar between groups in the type 1 diabetes trial [10].
- Population
- 363 adults with chronic kidney disease [9]; 253 people with heart failure [12]; 453 participants in 2 gout trials [1]; 530 people with type 1 diabetes [10].
- Sources
- [9], [12], [1], [10]
- Caveats
- None of these trials was large enough to count rare reactions such as severe skin reactions.
Cancer
Cancer was about as common as on placebo across 13 trials over about 5 years. The upper limit allows up to a 13% increase.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 13 trials with 49,621 participants, folic acid quadrupled blood folic acid and did not significantly change cancer incidence (1,904 against 1,809 cancers, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.13) over a weighted average of 5.2 years. No specific site differed [21]. A 2025 umbrella review found folic acid supplement use linked to lower colorectal cancer risk in observational data (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.90, low quality). In people with a past adenoma, adenoma recurrence on folic acid was RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.29, high quality), and high blood folate was linked to advanced-stage tumors (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.22, very low quality) [22].
- Population
- Participants in 10 cardiovascular prevention trials and 3 colorectal adenoma trials [21]; meta-analyses of trials and observational studies [22].
- Sources
- [21], [22]
- Caveats
- Covers the treatment period only. The upper confidence limit allows up to a 13% increase.
Side effects in trials
Not shown to raise side effects in trials. In pooled period pain trials, adverse effects were about 70% less frequent with heat than with NSAIDs.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 8 trials of 728 women, adverse effects were less frequent with heat than with NSAIDs (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59) [3]. In a back pain trial, no adverse event was serious, and the highest rate, 10.4%, was in the ibuprofen group [8].
- Population
- 728 women [3]. 371 adults [8].
- Sources
- [3], [8]
- Caveats
- The abstracts do not give the rate of skin redness or burns in the heat groups.
Side effects in trials
Not shown to cause more side effects than control treatments in 41 randomized trials. Most reported effects were mild.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 41 trials with 6,055 participants, the share of patients with adverse effects did not differ between homeopathy and control (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.14). About 68% of adverse effects were grade 1, the mildest level [21]. The children's respiratory review found adverse events reported inconsistently, with no serious events and one study showing more non-severe events in the homeopathy group [11]. One flu trial reported one headache [10].
- Population
- 41 randomized trials [21]. 8 trials in children [11].
- Sources
- [21], [11], [10]
- Caveats
- The review counted trials reporting effects, not a rate per person. Controls included placebo and conventional medicine [21].
Adverse events in trials
Trials reported manual lymphatic drainage was well tolerated, with minimal adverse events after breast cancer and cosmetic surgery.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The Cochrane review, which made adverse events a primary outcome, found drainage well tolerated in all six trials [1]. A review of drainage after cosmetic surgery found adverse events minimal [8]. The wisdom tooth trial reported no undesirable side effects [9].
- Population
- 6 trials in breast cancer lymphedema [1]. 7 studies after cosmetic surgery [8]. 46 dental patients [9].
- Sources
- [1], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- The abstracts give no event counts, and the trials were small.
Serious adverse events in trials
No serious adverse events were reported in 25 trials of massage for low back pain.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- There were no reports of serious adverse events in any of the 25 trials [4]. In the knee osteoarthritis trial, adverse events were described as minimal [7].
- Population
- 3,096 participants in 25 trials [4]. 222 adults [7].
- Sources
- [4], [7]
- Caveats
- Trials are too small to detect rare events, and many did not report adverse events at all.
Serious adverse events
Not shown to raise serious adverse events in pooled exercise therapy trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Serious adverse events did not rise with exercise therapy (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.02) [14]. No knee osteoarthritis exercise study reported a serious adverse event [4], and none occurred in either group of the meniscus trial over 2 years [9].
- Population
- 38,368 participants in 378 trials [14]. 54 knee osteoarthritis trials [4]. 140 adults [9].
- Sources
- [14], [4], [9]
- Caveats
- Trials enroll people judged fit to exercise.
Side effects overall, compared with placebo
Not shown to raise side effects overall, or stopping for side effects, against placebo in pooled trials of oral progestins in women with endometriosis.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Side effects overall (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.46) and withdrawals for side effects (RR 2.36, 95% CI 0.74 to 7.52) did not differ significantly from placebo, at moderate certainty [5]. A network meta-analysis found dienogest had the fewest adverse effects among dienogest, GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists [6]. In one clinic, 58% tolerated norethindrone acetate well and 80% dienogest [14].
- Population
- Women in 8 placebo or no-treatment trials [5]. 3,259 women [6]. 180 women [14].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [14]
- Caveats
- The confidence interval for withdrawals is wide and includes a doubling [5].
16 more
Death from any cause, unprocessed red meat
Not linked to death from any cause at the highest unprocessed red meat intake against the lowest, in pooled cohorts.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The highest against the lowest intake of unprocessed red meat gave a relative risk of 1.10 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.22), and dose-response analysis found no significant link [12].
- Population
- 6 prospective studies [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Observational, with few studies.
Serious harm
Not shown to cause serious harm: no serious adverse events from TENS were reported in large pain trials or in 19 labor trials, though many trials reported harms incompletely.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The large pain review found no serious adverse events [8]. Two fibromyalgia trials reported no TENS-related serious adverse events [12][13]. The labor review reported no adverse events, with little information on outcomes for mothers and babies [6]. Across 74 TENS trials, compliance with harms-reporting standards averaged 64.2% [17].
- Population
- 381 trials [8]. 685 people with fibromyalgia [12][13]. 1,671 women in labor [6]. 74 trials [17].
- Sources
- [8], [12], [13], [6], [17]
- Caveats
- Incomplete harms reporting means rare events could be missed [17].
Cancer
Cancer was about as common as on placebo, insulin or GLP-1 drugs over 26 to 72 weeks, with no rise in any cancer type.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Over 26 to 72 weeks, any cancer did not differ between tirzepatide and pooled controls (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.16), with or without diabetes, and no specific cancer type rose [24].
- Population
- 13,761 participants in 13 RCTs [24].
- Sources
- [24]
- Caveats
- Controls were placebo, insulin or GLP-1 drugs, pooled [24].
Serious adverse events in quit trials
Not shown to raise serious adverse events against nicotine replacement in pooled trials, with short follow-up and some reviews unable to rule out a rise.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Serious adverse events were probably similar with nicotine e-cigarettes and nicotine replacement (risk difference 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.02, 10 studies, moderate certainty) and similar against e-cigarettes without nicotine (RD 0.00). Evidence against behavioral support or no support was insufficient to judge [1]. Of 13 reviews that pooled serious adverse events, two found point estimates suggesting more with nicotine e-cigarettes, and the rest included no difference [3].
- Population
- 4,045 adults in 10 trials, 1,786 in 11 trials and 5,032 in 18 trials [1]. 13 reviews [3].
- Sources
- [1], [3]
- Caveats
- The authors state that longer, larger trials are needed to fully evaluate harms [1]. An overview of reviews called the serious adverse event evidence inconclusive [3].
Harms in older volunteers
Not found in two reviews of older adult volunteering, which reported no or negligible harms against benefits and noted harms may be under-reported.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A Campbell review found no adverse effects of volunteering in people 65 and older [3]. A mixed methods review of 182 papers found negligible reports of harms compared with benefits [17].
- Population
- Adults 65 and older in 24 pooled studies [3]. 182 papers, including 11 papers from 5 randomized trials at high risk of bias [17].
- Sources
- [3], [17]
- Caveats
- Harms were rarely measured, and the reviewers note they may be under-reported [17].
Human safety studies
Limited evidence: three uncontrolled human studies with 30 people in total reported no treatment-related adverse events, at very low certainty.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A 2026 systematic review found three human studies with 30 participants in total: a retrospective study of knee injections (16), a retrospective pilot of bladder instillation (12) and a prospective intravenous safety pilot (2). None reported treatment-related adverse events. All were judged of poor methodological quality, and certainty of evidence was rated very low [9]. A 2026 review found that validated pharmacokinetic and long-term safety data are lacking [10].
- Population
- 30 people across three uncontrolled studies [9].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Small, uncontrolled studies cannot detect uncommon harms or give rates.
Human safety trials
Small trials reported no serious adverse reactions on CJC-1295, and adverse events about as common on IV ipamorelin as on placebo after bowel surgery.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In two randomized, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose trials of CJC-1295 lasting 28 and 49 days, no serious adverse reactions were reported [1]. In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous ipamorelin after bowel surgery, any treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 87.5% on ipamorelin and 94.8% on placebo [4].
- Population
- Healthy adults aged 21 to 61 [1]; 117 adults after small or large bowel resection, 114 in the safety analysis, treated for up to 7 days [4].
- Sources
- [1], [4]
- Caveats
- Small and short trials. They tested each peptide alone, not the two combined. The ipamorelin trial abstract does not report the serious events FDA cites [5][4].
Cancer
One trial found no difference in cancers between insulin glargine and standard care over a median 6.2 years in 12,537 people.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Cancers did not differ between the glargine and standard care groups (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.13) over a median 6.2 years [8].
- Population
- 12,537 people with cardiovascular risk factors and raised blood sugar or type 2 diabetes, mean age 63.5 [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- One manufacturer-funded trial of one insulin.
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 12,537 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Adverse events in trials
Not found in the trials that checked: no adverse events were reported in a 385-woman breast cancer trial or a sham-controlled Parkinson's trial.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- No adverse events were reported among 385 women with advanced breast cancer [6] or among 30 people with Parkinson's disease [5].
- Population
- 385 women [6]. 30 adults [5].
- Sources
- [6], [5]
- Caveats
- Most reflexology trials did not report on harms, so rare events cannot be ruled out.
Adverse events
Not found: no study in a review of 14 sham-controlled trials reported adverse effects, and NCCIH states Reiki has not been shown to have harmful effects.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- No study in the review of sham-controlled mental health trials reported adverse effects of Reiki [2]. NCCIH states that Reiki has not been shown to have any harmful effects [1]. The Cochrane review found no evidence of harm, from very few people [6].
- Population
- 14 trials [2]. 3 trials [6].
- Sources
- [2], [1], [6]
- Caveats
- Most trials did not look for harms systematically.
Long-term use
One small 12-month trial in former smokers found no severe adverse events on sulforaphane. Longer use was not studied.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 43 former smokers randomized to sulforaphane or placebo for 12 months, 37 of whom completed the study, no severe adverse event was observed [10].
- Population
- 43 former smokers at high risk for lung cancer, 17 on sulforaphane and 20 on placebo completing [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- One small trial. The abstract reports only severe events, not milder ones or their rates. No trial longer than 12 months was located.
Serious adverse events
No intervention-related serious adverse events were reported in a review of 153 randomized trials or in the knee osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- No intervention-related serious adverse events appeared in 153 trials [16]. No serious adverse events occurred in the knee osteoarthritis trial against physical therapy [10], and none related to the interventions in the fibromyalgia trial [11].
- Population
- 153 trials [16]. 204 adults [10]. 226 adults [11].
- Sources
- [16], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Only 12% of trials described how they monitored adverse events [16].
Adverse events in trials
Adverse events were absent or mild and no more common than with placebo across meta-analyses of pain, tendon and acne trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- No adverse events were reported across 22 knee osteoarthritis trials [6] or in tendinopathy trials [9]. In neck pain trials, side effects were mild and did not differ from placebo [8]. In acne trials, adverse events with red light were mild or absent [21]. In a sham-controlled facial trial, no adverse effects occurred in 76 people [29].
- Population
- 1,063 people with knee osteoarthritis [6]. 820 people with neck pain [8]. 422 people with acne [21]. 76 people in a facial trial [29].
- Sources
- [6], [9], [8], [21], [29], [22]
- Caveats
- Trials lasted weeks to months. A Cochrane review of light therapies for acne rated the evidence on adverse effects very low in quality because trials reported them inadequately [22].
Core temperature in pregnancy
No pregnant woman reached a core temperature of 39.0°C across 12 studies of exercise, hot baths and sauna. Mean core temperature after sauna was 37.6°C.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 12 studies (347 pregnant women) found the highest individual core temperature was 38.9°C, during land-based exercise. The highest mean end-of-trial core temperature for sauna exposure was 37.6°C (95% CI 37.5 to 37.7), in sessions of up to 20 minutes at 70°C and 15% relative humidity [42].
- Population
- 347 pregnant women at any stage of pregnancy in 12 studies [42].
- Sources
- [42]
- Caveats
- The studies measured core temperature against a proposed threshold of 39.0°C, not birth outcomes. Sauna exposures were no longer than 20 minutes and no hotter than 70°C, cooler than many of the protocols on this page.
Serious adverse events in a cold shower trial
No related serious adverse events were reported among 3,018 adults taking daily cold shower finishes for 30 days.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The trial of 30 to 90 second cold shower finishes reported no related serious adverse events [17]. In the Cochrane review of post-exercise immersion, most trials did not actively monitor predefined adverse events [1].
- Population
- 3,018 adults aged 18 to 65 without severe comorbidity [17]. 17 trials [1].
- Sources
- [17], [1]
- Caveats
- People with severe comorbidity were excluded, and a shower finish is a smaller exposure than immersion. Trials that do not look for adverse events cannot rule them out [1].
Serious adverse events in trials
No serious adverse events occurred in a 149-person heart failure trial of 10 daily sessions, and small studies in arthritis and chronic fatigue reported none.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- No serious adverse events were observed in either group of the WAON-CHF trial [4]. In 34 people with rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis, no adverse effects and no flare of disease were reported over 8 sessions [27]. None of 10 inpatients with chronic fatigue syndrome reported adverse effects over 4 weeks [28]. In the depression trial, adverse events were generally mild in both the heated and sham groups [16].
- Population
- 149 hospitalized patients with advanced heart failure [4]. 34 patients with inflammatory arthritis [27]. 10 inpatients [28]. 30 adults with major depressive disorder [16].
- Sources
- [4], [27], [28], [16]
- Caveats
- These were supervised sessions of 15 minutes at 60°C in clinics, with patients monitored. The trials were too small and short to detect uncommon events, and none describes unsupervised home use. No case series of injuries from home infrared saunas was located.
Not studied in people36
Longer life
Not studied in people. AKG lengthened life in worms and in one mouse study, but a multi-site mouse program found no longer lifespan.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- AKG extended the lifespan of adult C. elegans worms, an effect that required ATP synthase and TOR signaling [6]. In C57BL/6 mice, calcium AKG in the diet gave a longer life with less frailty and lower levels of inflammatory cytokines [7]. In the Interventions Testing Program, AKG given to genetically mixed UM-HET3 mice at three sites did not significantly increase lifespan in males or females [8].
- Population
- C. elegans worms [6]. C57BL/6 mice [7]. UM-HET3 mice at three US sites [8].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Lifespan has not been measured in people. The mouse results disagree, and the multi-site program tested a different dose or starting age from earlier work [8]. The epigenetic age studies above do not measure lifespan.
Longer life
Not studied in people. One mouse study found 12% longer median life in males, and a later study at other doses found no longer lifespan.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In genetically mixed UM-HET3 mice fed astaxanthin from 12 months of age, median male lifespan rose 12% (p = 0.003). Lifespan in females was not significantly affected [11]. In a follow-up program at three sites, astaxanthin given at different doses or later starting ages did not increase lifespan in either sex, and an apparent shorter female lifespan disappeared once one site's unusual controls were set aside [12]. Astaxanthin also lengthened the life of C. elegans worms, an effect that depended on the SKN-1 and PHA-4 genes [13].
- Population
- UM-HET3 mice at three US sites [11][12]. C. elegans worms [13].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Lifespan has not been measured in people. The mouse results differ by sex, dose and starting age [11][12].
General health and detox from colon cleansing
Not studied in people in rigorous controlled trials. The detox idea rests on the old theory of autointoxication, that bowel waste poisons the body.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body, documented traditional use.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of conventional and alternative medicine literature found no methodologically rigorous controlled trials of colonic cleansing for general health promotion, and multiple case reports and case series of adverse effects [6]. A history of the practice traces it to autointoxication, the 19th century doctrine that intestinal waste products poison the body, which declined once its scientific rationale was shown to be wrong [7].
- Population
- No trial population. A systematic review [6] and a historical review [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- No study located measured toxins removed from the body by colon cleansing.
Longevity
Not studied in people. Fasting-mimicking cycles started at middle age lengthened life in mice, and in prematurely aging mice, and extended yeast lifespan.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In mice, cycles of a fasting-mimicking diet twice a month started at middle age extended longevity, lowered visceral fat and cancer incidence, and slowed bone density loss. Alternating fasting and feeding also extended yeast lifespan [11]. In prematurely aging mice, the diet significantly prolonged lifespan, and in naturally aging mice it improved cognitive and gut measures [12].
- Population
- Yeast and mice [11]. Prematurely and naturally aging mice [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Lifespan has not been measured in people. The biological age findings above are markers, not lifespan [9]. The diet cycles in mice differ from the 5-day monthly cycles used in human trials [5].
Longer life
Not studied in people. Fisetin given late in life lengthened mouse lifespan in one study but not in a multi-site program, and dasatinib plus quercetin extended survival in old mice.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In wild-type mice given fisetin late in life, median and maximum lifespan rose, with less age-related tissue damage [14]. In the Interventions Testing Program, fisetin did not significantly change lifespan in either sex of genetically mixed mice at the dose and schedule used [15]. In old mice, intermittent dasatinib plus quercetin raised survival after treatment by 36% and cut the mortality hazard to 65% [16].
- Population
- Progeroid and aged wild-type mice [14]. UM-HET3 mice at three US sites [15]. Old mice and mice given transplanted senescent cells [16].
- Sources
- [14], [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Lifespan has not been measured in people. The mouse results for fisetin disagree [14][15]. Quercetin was tested with dasatinib, a cancer drug, not alone [16].
Longer life
Not studied in people. In one study from the group behind the human trials, mice given GlyNAC lived 24% longer than control mice.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- C57BL/6J mice given GlyNAC lived 24% longer than mice given placebo, with improved glutathione, oxidative stress, mitochondrial and DNA damage measures in heart, liver and kidney [7].
- Population
- C57BL/6J mice [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One mouse study by the same research group that ran most of the human trials [7][3]. Lifespan has not been measured in people, and the study has not been repeated by another lab.
Longer lifespan
Not studied in people as a lifespan outcome. In mice, less growth hormone goes with longer life, the opposite of the claim.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Mice with the growth hormone gene knocked out lived longer than normal mice in both sexes, while weighing less, carrying more body fat as a share of weight and handling glucose less well [13]. Mice lacking growth hormone releasing hormone were long-lived, and calorie restriction lengthened their lives further [14]. In SAMP8 mice, a drug that blocks the growth hormone releasing hormone receptor raised mean life expectancy by 8 weeks, with no rise in maximum lifespan [15].
- Population
- Growth hormone knockout mice [13]. GHRH knockout mice [14]. SAMP8 mice, a strain with shortened life expectancy [15].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- These studies lowered growth hormone rather than adding it, and mice are not people. No trial has measured lifespan in adults given growth hormone. The mortality findings after childhood treatment are covered under Risks [10].
Hangover
Not studied in people as an IV drip. Drips are offered on the idea that hangover is dehydration, and studies of drinkers find the two occur together but independently.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- No trial located gave IV fluids or vitamins for hangover. A review of drinkers found hangover severity and thirst rose with the water people drank, that dehydration was mild and short-lived while hangovers lasted longer, and that water drunk during a hangover was not related to changes in its severity [8]. In a 2024 secret shopper study, 86.2% of IV spas suggested specific drips for headache and cold symptoms, and 2 of 255 spa websites cited a source for any health claim [1].
- Population
- No study population for IV drips. Survey and naturalistic data on drinkers [8].
- Sources
- [8], [1]
- Caveats
- Findings on drinking water do not test an IV drip. No study located measured hangover symptoms after an IV drip.
Adrenal fatigue
Not studied in people for adrenal fatigue. Licorice slows the body's inactivation of cortisol, and a systematic review found no evidence adrenal fatigue is a medical condition.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 7 healthy volunteers given licorice, sodium retention came with a change in cortisol metabolism showing that licorice blocks 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, the enzyme that converts cortisol to inactive cortisone in the kidney [14]. A systematic review of 58 studies of cortisol and fatigue found no substantiation that adrenal fatigue is an actual medical condition [15].
- Population
- 7 healthy volunteers in a mechanism study [14]. 58 studies of cortisol and fatigue [15].
- Sources
- [14], [15]
- Caveats
- The enzyme effect is what raises blood pressure and lowers potassium (see Risks), and it does not show that licorice changes fatigue. No trial of licorice for fatigue or adrenal symptoms was located.
Detox, fat loss and cellulite
Not studied in people for these claims. Drainage is a hands-on technique used to move fluid out of swollen tissue, and no study located measured toxins or fat removed.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Manual lymphatic drainage is studied as a treatment for lymphedema, usually within complete decongestive therapy [1][11]. No study located measured toxin removal, fat loss, weight loss or cellulite after manual lymphatic drainage.
- Population
- No study population for these claims. Reviews of drainage for lymphedema [1][11].
- Sources
- [1], [11]
- Caveats
- Moving fluid in swollen limbs is not the same as removing toxins or fat, and neither has been measured.
Energy and mitochondrial function in healthy people
Not studied in people. In human cells in the lab, methylene blue raised mitochondrial complex IV by 30% and oxygen use by 37 to 70%.
No study in people. This rests on lab studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In cultured human fibroblasts, nanomolar methylene blue increased mitochondrial complex IV by 30%, raised cellular oxygen consumption by 37 to 70% and increased heme synthesis. The authors propose this comes from methylene blue cycling between its oxidized and reduced forms inside mitochondria [8].
- Population
- Human IMR90 fibroblasts and HepG2 liver cells in culture, and rat liver mitochondria [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Cell culture only. No trial was located that measured energy, fatigue or mitochondrial function in healthy people taking methylene blue.
Longevity
Not studied in people. In a multi-site mouse lifespan study it did not change median lifespan, with a 6% rise in maximum lifespan in females only.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, lab studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In genetically mixed mice tested at three sites, methylene blue did not alter median lifespan in males or females, and raised female maximum lifespan by 6% (P = 0.004) [9]. In culture, it extended the lifespan of human fibroblasts by more than 20 population doublings [8].
- Population
- Genetically heterogeneous mice at three sites [9]. Human IMR90 fibroblasts in culture [8].
- Sources
- [9], [8]
- Caveats
- Mouse and cell results do not show what happens to human lifespan. No study of methylene blue and aging outcomes in people was located.
24 more
Hangover
Not studied in people. In mice given binge doses of alcohol, silymarin limited the rise in the liver enzyme ALT and liver fat.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In mice given three large doses of alcohol over 24 hours, silymarin given with the alcohol lessened the rise in serum ALT, liver fat, lipid peroxidation and liver TNF, and the fall in liver glutathione [13]. A review of 82 marketed hangover products found milk thistle extract among the most common ingredients and no peer-reviewed human data showing the safety or efficacy of any of the products [14].
- Population
- Mice, 6 per group [13]. 82 hangover products on the market [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- The mouse study measured liver injury, not hangover symptoms such as headache, nausea or fatigue. No trial of milk thistle for hangover in people was located.
Aging and longevity
Not studied in people. MOTS-c treatment started late in life raised physical capacity and healthspan in old mice.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In mice, MOTS-c treatment begun at 23.5 months of age increased physical capacity and healthspan [12]. A 2022 review reports that MOTS-c levels in plasma decline with age, and reviews reported effects on diabetes, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, postmenopausal obesity and Alzheimer's disease [14].
- Population
- Old mice [12]. Studies reviewed in [14].
- Sources
- [12], [14]
- Caveats
- The study abstract reports physical capacity and healthspan, not lifespan [12]. Lower MOTS-c levels with age in people do not show that taking it changes how people age.
Energy, fatigue and well-being
Not studied in people. In rodents, raising NAD often improved metabolic, mitochondrial and physical function measures, with results varying by model.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2026 systematic review of 80 rodent studies found that raising NAD was frequently associated with improvements in metabolic, mitochondrial, inflammatory and functional outcomes, though effects varied across models and endpoints. It found no outcome trial of IV or intramuscular NAD for wellness in people [6].
- Population
- Rodents in 80 studies of NAD-related compounds given by mouth or by injection [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Rodent results do not show how people feel after an infusion. The rodent studies covered NAD-related compounds in general, not infused NAD alone. No trial measured energy, fatigue or well-being after IV NAD [6].
Longer life
Not studied in people. No lifespan study of infused NAD was located, and mouse studies of oral NR, an NAD precursor, disagree.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In one lab, NR raised NAD, rejuvenated muscle stem cells in aged mice and increased mouse lifespan [9]. In genetically mixed mice tested at three sites by the US National Institute on Aging program, NR did not increase lifespan in either sex [10].
- Population
- Aged mice [9]. Genetically heterogeneous mice at three sites [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Both studies gave NR by mouth, not NAD by infusion. Mouse lifespan results do not show what happens in people.
Longer life
Not studied in people. Mouse studies disagree: NR lengthened lifespan in one lab, while a multi-site US aging institute program found no lifespan gain in either sex.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In one lab, NR raised NAD, rejuvenated muscle stem cells in aged mice, delayed senescence of neural and melanocyte stem cells and increased mouse lifespan [11]. In genetically mixed mice tested at three sites by the US National Institute on Aging program, NR did not increase lifespan in males or females at the doses tested [12].
- Population
- Aged mice [11]. Genetically heterogeneous mice at three sites [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Mouse lifespan results do not show what happens in people. The larger multi-site test found no effect [12].
Longer life
Not studied in people. NMN lengthened life in a strain of prematurely aging mice and eased age-related decline over 12 months in normal mice.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In Zmpste24-deficient mice, a prematurely aging strain, NMN prolonged lifespan and delayed signs of aging [12]. In normal mice given NMN by mouth for 12 months, NMN suppressed age-related weight gain, raised energy metabolism and physical activity, and improved insulin sensitivity, blood lipids and eye function, with no obvious toxicity [13].
- Population
- Zmpste24-deficient mice [12]. Wild-type C57BL/6N mice during normal aging [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- The lifespan gain was in a premature aging strain, and the 12-month study in normal mice did not report lifespan in its abstract [13]. Mouse results do not show what happens to human lifespan.
Cancer, anti-aging, detox and chronic infections
Not studied in people for these claims in controlled trials located. They rest on proposed hormetic, antioxidant and immune effects of ozone.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- An umbrella review notes that ozone therapy has been proposed across many conditions on the basis of hormetic, antioxidant and immune-modulating effects. The meta-analyses of randomized trials it located covered only periodontitis, COVID-19, diabetic foot ulcers and wisdom tooth surgery [12]. The FDA's device rule states ozone has no known useful medical application in preventive or adjunctive therapy [1].
- Population
- No study population for these claims. An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized trials [12].
- Sources
- [12], [1]
- Caveats
- A proposed mechanism is not a measured effect in people. No trial located measured toxins removed, aging or cancer outcomes.
Longer life
Not studied in people. In a short-lived, fast-aging mouse strain, lifelong PQQ in the diet extended 75th percentile survival by 73%.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In senescence-accelerated SAMP8 mice, a strain with a short lifespan, lifelong PQQ at 0.02% of the diet prolonged survival at the 75th percentile by 73% against controls and delayed signs of aging and age-related muscle decline. Starting PQQ in midlife improved muscle function that had declined with age [7].
- Population
- Senescence-accelerated SAMP8 mice [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One study in a fast-aging strain, not normally aging mice. One author also wrote the maker-run memory trial [1]. Mouse survival does not show what happens to human lifespan.
Longer human lifespan
Not studied in people. Started late in life, rapamycin lengthened median and maximum lifespan in both male and female mice at three test sites.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In genetically mixed mice fed rapamycin from 600 days of age, median and maximum lifespan rose in both sexes. Age at 90% mortality rose 14% in females and 9% in males, at three independent sites, and disease patterns did not differ from controls. Mice started at 270 days of age also survived longer at an interim analysis [9]. No study measuring lifespan in people taking rapamycin was located. In kidney transplant recipients, mortality was higher on sirolimus (see Risks) [6].
- Population
- Genetically heterogeneous mice at three sites [9].
- Sources
- [9], [6]
- Caveats
- Mouse lifespan does not show what happens in people. The transplant finding comes from people on combined immunosuppression, not healthy adults, and does not measure aging [6].
Minerals in sea salt and pink salt
Not studied in people. Lab analysis of 31 pink salts found minerals in amounts that would need over 30 g of salt a day to matter.
No study in people. This rests on lab studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Mass spectrometry of 31 pink salt samples sold in Australia found wide variation in minerals, more in Himalayan, flake and darker salts. The authors calculated that more than 30 g a day, about 6 teaspoons, would be needed for a meaningful mineral contribution. One sample exceeded the national limit for lead [16].
- Population
- 31 retail pink salt samples and one iodized table salt [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- A product analysis with no people studied. Mineral content says nothing about effects on health.
Longevity
Not studied in people. Sirtuins are linked to aging in lab and animal research, but a review notes poor uptake of the food compounds that modulate them.
No study in people. This rests on lab studies, animal studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2022 review of sirtuin research describes their role in metabolism, antioxidant protection and aging, and reports that compounds modulating sirtuins worked in numerous lab and animal studies. It names low bioavailability and short retention of these modulators as a central problem, and warns of risks from careless sirtuin modulation [4]. Resveratrol did not change SIRT1 in people across 11 randomized trials [3].
- Population
- Lab and animal studies, reviewed [4]. Adults in 11 RCTs of resveratrol [3].
- Sources
- [4], [3]
- Caveats
- No study of the Sirtfood diet and lifespan or mortality in people was located. Sirtuin activation by food has not been shown in people [3].
Longer life
Not studied in people. In roundworms, sulforaphane lengthened lifespan and improved mobility through the FOXO aging pathway.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In wild-type C. elegans worms, sulforaphane prolonged lifespan and increased mobility and food intake. The effect depended on the TRA-1 and DAF-16 genes, the worm versions of human GLI and FOXO, and disappeared when either was blocked [12].
- Population
- C. elegans roundworms, wild-type and 4 mutant strains [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- A worm study. No mammal lifespan study or human study of lifespan was located.
Longevity and aging
Not studied in people. Taurine supplements lengthened lifespan in mice and worms, but in 137 men blood taurine did not fall with age.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Blood taurine declined with age in mice, monkeys and humans. Taurine supplements increased health span and lifespan in mice and worms and health span in monkeys, and reduced cellular senescence, DNA damage and inflammation markers [10]. A later study of 137 men aged 20 to 93 found no link between circulating taurine and age, muscle mass, strength, physical performance or mitochondrial function [11].
- Population
- Worms, mice and monkeys, with human blood level data [10]. 137 inactive and active men aged 20 to 93 [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- The lifespan results are from animals. The human data are blood levels, not supplement trials, and the two studies disagree on whether levels fall with age [10][11]. No trial of taurine and aging outcomes in people was located.
Longer life
Not studied in people. Betaine supplements extended lifespan in roundworms, and a review describes effects on methylation and inflammation linked to aging.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In C. elegans worms, betaine supplementation extended lifespan through FoxO, MAPK, autophagy and mTOR pathways, and three anti-aging drugs raised betaine levels [8]. A 2025 review reports that betaine may counter aging-related changes in methylation by raising S-adenosylmethionine, lowers homocysteine, and reduced oxidative stress and inflammation in studies, and found no clear link between dietary betaine and heart disease or type 2 diabetes [9].
- Population
- C. elegans roundworms [8]. Human and animal studies, reviewed [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- A worm lifespan study and a narrative review. The review states that efficacy and safety of betaine in older people need further research [9]. No study of betaine and human lifespan was located.
Longer life
Not studied in people. Urolithin A extended lifespan in roundworms and improved exercise capacity in aging mice and young rats.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In C. elegans worms, urolithin A induced mitophagy, prevented the age-related buildup of dysfunctional mitochondria and extended lifespan, with longer normal mobility. In two mouse models of age-related muscle decline and in young rats, it improved exercise capacity [9].
- Population
- C. elegans roundworms, mice and rats [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- The lifespan result is from worms. Rodent results covered exercise capacity, not lifespan. No study of urolithin A and human lifespan was located.
Cancer concern
FDA states epitalon has the potential to cause cancer from a mechanistic standpoint, and that the mouse studies were too limited to judge it.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- FDA stated that, from a mechanistic standpoint, epitalon has the potential to cause cancer. It found the available mouse studies too limited to inform epitalon's genotoxic or cancer-causing potential, because they used one fixed dose, female mice only and short exposures [2].
- Population
- Animal studies (mice) and mechanistic reasoning reviewed by FDA [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- A theoretical concern with no human cancer data either way. No carcinogenicity study adequate to settle it was located by FDA [2].
Long-term use
Not studied in people. Rats given 1.5 g/kg a day for 90 days, five to seven times the maximum human dose, showed no adverse events or organ changes.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Rats given a single 2 g/kg dose, or 1.5 g/kg a day for 90 days, had no adverse events or deaths. Necropsy found no lesions or changes in organ weights, and kidney tissue was normal [10]. The longest human trials located ran 16 weeks [6].
- Population
- Rats [10].
- Sources
- [10], [6]
- Caveats
- A 90-day rat study does not show what years of use do in people. No human study longer than 16 weeks was located.
Long-term use
Not studied in people. Over 4 weeks, daily NAD injections in rats caused reversible injection-site and nerve lesions. Higher single doses raised heart rate in dogs.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In standardized toxicity studies, single intramuscular NAD injections in dogs at the higher doses tested raised heart rate, shortened PR and QT intervals and lowered blood pressure. Daily injections in rats for 4 weeks caused injection-site and sciatic nerve lesions that reversed after a 4-week recovery. Irritation, hemolysis and anaphylaxis tests were negative [11]. A 2026 review found long-term safety data in people lacking [7].
- Population
- Beagle dogs, rats, rabbits and guinea pigs [11]. Human studies of IV NAD [7].
- Sources
- [11], [7]
- Caveats
- Short animal studies of intramuscular injection. No study followed people through repeated infusions over months or years.
Long-term use
Not studied in people. In rats, 90 days at high doses affected the liver, kidneys, ovaries and testes. In a mouse breast cancer model, NR increased spread to the brain.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, lab studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- NR was not genotoxic in lab tests. In a 90-day rat study, NR at the highest dose had a toxicity profile similar to nicotinamide, with the liver, kidneys, ovaries and testes as target organs. The no observed adverse effect level was 300 mg/kg a day and the lowest observed adverse effect level 1,000 mg/kg a day [13]. In a mouse model of triple negative breast cancer, NR supplementation significantly increased cancer prevalence and metastases to the brain [14]. The longest human trial located ran 52 weeks [8].
- Population
- Rats, and bacterial and cell assays [13]. Mice with triple negative breast cancer [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [8]
- Caveats
- The rat study tested 300 to 3,000 mg/kg a day [13]. The cancer finding comes from one model of one cancer type. No human study followed use for longer than a year.
Long-term use
Not studied in people. Mice given NMN for 12 months showed no obvious toxicity. Human trials located ran 24 weeks or less.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Normal mice given NMN by mouth for 12 months showed no obvious toxicity or harmful effects [13]. Pooled human trials ran from 14 days to 24 weeks [8]. A 90-day rat study in the EU safety assessment found effects on reproductive organs at higher doses (see European safety assessment) [10].
- Population
- Wild-type mice [13]. Trial participants [8]. Rats [10].
- Sources
- [13], [8], [10]
- Caveats
- A one-year mouse study does not show what years of use do in people, and its abstract does not list the safety measures checked [13].
Long-term use
Not studied in people. Rats given up to 700 mg/kg a day for 90 days had no adverse effects, and one lab test found chromosome damage in human cells.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, lab studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- High-purity trans-resveratrol caused no adverse effects in rats at up to 500 mg/kg a day for 28 days or 700 mg/kg a day for 90 days, and no reproductive effects in an embryo-fetal study at 750 mg/kg a day. It was not mutagenic in bacteria and not genotoxic in a rat bone marrow test, but it caused chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes in the lab [15]. The longest human trial on this page ran 52 weeks [13].
- Population
- Rats, bacteria and human lymphocytes in culture [15].
- Sources
- [15], [13]
- Caveats
- Studies of 90 days or less in rats, of one product. They do not show what years of use do in people.
Long-term use
Not studied in people. Lifelong spermidine extended lifespan in mice, while lab and animal work links spermidine both to colorectal tumor growth and to protection.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, lab studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Oral spermidine extended the lifespan of mice and reduced cardiac hypertrophy in old mice [8]. A 2026 review describes spermidine as a pro-tumor metabolite that sustains colorectal cancer growth through a MYC and eIF5A circuit, while other experiments found high doses killed cancer cells and spermidine protected against colitis-associated cancer [9]. Human trials located lasted up to 12 months [1].
- Population
- Mice and rats [8]. Cell and animal models of colorectal cancer, reviewed [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [1]
- Caveats
- Animal and lab findings point in different directions and do not show what years of supplement use do in people. No supplement trial longer than a year was located.
Long-term use
Not studied in people. Rats fed urolithin A at up to 5% of their diet for 90 days showed no adverse changes, and it was not genotoxic in lab tests.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, lab studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 28-day and 90-day rat studies with urolithin A at up to 5% of the diet, clinical measures, blood chemistry and blood counts did not change and no target organ was found. The no observed adverse effect level was the highest dose tested, 3,451 mg/kg a day in males and 3,826 mg/kg a day in females. A battery of genotoxicity tests was negative [10]. The longest human trial on this page ran 4 months [3].
- Population
- Rats, and genotoxicity assays [10].
- Sources
- [10], [3]
- Caveats
- A 90-day rat study does not show what years of use do in people. Kidney stones containing urolithin A have been reported in people eating walnuts, though none of those with a diet history reported supplements (see Kidney stones) [8].
Drugs that speed its breakdown
Not studied in people. The injection label predicts that strong liver enzyme inducers such as rifampin, carbamazepine and St. John's wort may lower its levels.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The label states that moderate or strong CYP3A inducers, including rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, efavirenz, modafinil and St. John's wort, may lower medroxyprogesterone acetate levels and its effect, a prediction from how the drug is broken down that was not confirmed in a clinical study [1].
- Population
- No people studied; a regulator's prediction from metabolism [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Predicted, not observed.
Not yet researched3
Anti-aging
We haven't sourced research on this yet.
Aging, longevity and telomeres
We haven't sourced research on this yet.
Electrical hazard from grounding products connected to household wiring
We haven't sourced research on this yet.