Brain and nerves
What research found here. What was shown to help comes first, then the risks reported, most common first.
Brain and nerves
Strong several reviews agree · Moderate one review or consistent trials · Limited one or a few small studies · Untested no study in people, listed with what it rests on
Shown to help323
Chronic pain across conditions
Shown to ease chronic pain about 0.5 standard deviations more than no acupuncture and about 0.2 more than sham acupuncture, with effects lasting a year.
Compared with sham acupuncture [2][3]; no acupuncture [2][3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In individual patient data from 39 trials, acupuncture was superior to both sham and no acupuncture for each pain condition (all P < .001). The difference was close to 0.5 standard deviations against no acupuncture and close to 0.2 against sham, and about 15% of the effect was lost at 1 year. Effects were smaller in trials whose sham used a penetrating needle [2]. The earlier analysis of 29 trials found pain scores lower than sham by 0.23 SD for back and neck pain, 0.16 SD for osteoarthritis and 0.15 SD for chronic headache, and lower than no acupuncture by 0.55, 0.57 and 0.42 SD [3].
- Population
- 20,827 patients with nonspecific musculoskeletal pain, osteoarthritis, chronic headache or shoulder pain in 39 trials [2]. 17,922 patients in 29 trials [3].
- Sources
- [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The two analyses come from the same collaboration and the later one contains the earlier trials. Patients and acupuncturists cannot be blinded when the comparison is no acupuncture, so the larger effect includes expectation. The authors say factors beyond needling contribute to the effect [3].
ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents
Shown to reduce ADHD symptoms more than placebo in children and adolescents over about 12 weeks, with moderate to large effects for amphetamines and methylphenidate.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis, clinician-rated ADHD symptoms closest to 12 weeks improved more than placebo with amphetamines (SMD -1.02, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.85) and methylphenidate (SMD -0.78, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.62). On teacher ratings, methylphenidate was better than placebo (SMD -0.82, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.48) [1]. A Cochrane review of methylphenidate found teacher-rated symptoms improved (SMD -0.74, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.61), equal to 10.58 points on a 72-point rating scale where 6.6 points is considered the smallest clinically relevant change [2]. A Cochrane review of amphetamines found improvement on parent ratings (SMD -0.57, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.27), teacher ratings (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.27) and clinician ratings (SMD -0.84, 95% CI -1.32 to -0.36), with more children rated as responders (RR 3.36, 95% CI 2.48 to 4.55) [3].
- Population
- 10,068 children and adolescents in the efficacy analysis of 133 double-blind trials [1]; 16,302 participants aged 3 to 18 in 212 trials, mean treatment length 28.8 days [2]; 2,675 children aged 3 to 17 in 23 trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Both Cochrane reviews rated the evidence low to very low certainty, and [2] judged every trial at high risk of bias once unblinding by side effects is counted. Of the methylphenidate trials, 41% had industry funding. Too few data existed for 26 or 52 weeks [1]. Methylphenidate did not change quality of life (SMD 0.40, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.83) [2].
ADHD symptoms in adults
Shown to reduce ADHD symptoms more than placebo in adults in short trials, with larger effects for amphetamines than for methylphenidate.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Clinician-rated symptoms improved more than placebo with amphetamines (SMD -0.79, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.58) and methylphenidate (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.35) [1]. A Cochrane review of amphetamines found reduced symptom severity rated by clinicians (SMD -0.90, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.75) and by patients (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.28). By drug, lisdexamfetamine (SMD -1.06, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.85) and mixed amphetamine salts (SMD -0.80, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.66) reduced symptoms, while one study of dexamphetamine found no evidence that it did (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.80 to 0.32) [4]. A Cochrane review of extended-release methylphenidate found a small to moderate improvement in self-rated symptoms (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.30) and investigator-rated symptoms (SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.36), and no effect on days missed at work [5].
- Population
- 8,131 adults in the efficacy analysis [1]; 2,521 adults in 19 studies with a mean length of 5.3 weeks [4]; 5,066 adults in 24 trials with a median length of 8 weeks [5].
- Sources
- [1], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Certainty was rated low to very low in both Cochrane reviews. Amphetamines did not improve retention in treatment (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.13) [4]. Trials often excluded people with depression or anxiety or enrolled only earlier responders, which may overstate benefit [5].
Depression in adults
Shown to raise response in depression against placebo, with about 2.7 times the odds, and had the highest odds of response of 21 antidepressants, with higher dropout rates.
Compared with placebo [1][2]; other antidepressants in head-to-head trials [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 18 trials, response was more likely on amitriptyline than placebo (OR 2.67, 95% CI 2.21 to 3.23). Fewer people left for lack of effect (OR 0.20), and more left for side effects (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.71 to 6.35) [1]. In a network meta-analysis of 21 antidepressants, amitriptyline had the highest odds of response against placebo (OR 2.13, 95% CrI 1.89 to 2.41), was among the drugs with higher response rates in head-to-head trials, and was among those with the highest dropout rates [2].
- Population
- 3,509 adults with major depression in 39 trials of 3 to 12 weeks [1]; 116,477 adults in 522 trials [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Randomization, allocation concealment and blinding were usually poorly reported, and funnel plots suggested possible publication bias [1]. Certainty in the network analysis ranged from moderate to very low [2].
After a heart attack, stroke or with artery disease
Shown to cut serious vascular events by about a quarter in high-risk patients, about 36 fewer per 1,000 treated for two years after a heart attack.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Among high-risk patients, antiplatelet therapy lowered serious vascular events by about one quarter, nonfatal heart attack by one third, nonfatal stroke by one quarter and vascular death by one sixth. The absolute reduction was 36 per 1,000 treated for two years after a heart attack, 36 per 1,000 after a stroke or transient ischemic attack, and 38 per 1,000 treated for one month during an acute heart attack. Aspirin was the most widely studied drug [1]. In secondary prevention trials with individual data, serious vascular events occurred at 6.7% a year on aspirin against 8.2% on control, total stroke at 2.08% against 2.54% and coronary events at 4.3% against 5.3% [2].
- Population
- High-risk patients in a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized antiplatelet trials [1]; secondary prevention trials with individual participant data [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Both analyses come from the same collaboration. The band above is the absolute reduction of 36 per 1,000 over two years [1].
Sleep
Shown to improve overall sleep in adults, more in people with insomnia, at 600 mg a day or more, and after 8 weeks or longer.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 5 RCTs (400 participants), ashwagandha extract improved overall sleep (SMD -0.59, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.42, I² 62%). Effects were larger in adults diagnosed with insomnia, at 600 mg a day or more, and at 8 weeks or longer. Mental alertness on rising and anxiety improved, and quality of life did not change [5]. In people with mental disorders, sleep quality improved (SMD -1.35, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.91) [2].
- Population
- Adults 18 and older in 5 RCTs [5]. People with mental disorders [2].
- Sources
- [5], [2]
- Caveats
- Five trials in [5], whose authors write that data on serious adverse effects are limited. The mental disorders review describes a role in insomnia as still to be clarified [2].
ADHD in children, atomoxetine
Shown to reduce ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents more than placebo, a medium effect size of about 0.6.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis, atomoxetine lowered clinician-rated core ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents at about 12 weeks (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.45). For teacher ratings, only methylphenidate and modafinil separated from placebo among the drugs with data [1]. Across 25 trials, atomoxetine outperformed placebo on overall ADHD symptoms (effect size -0.64, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.71), and the authors noted about 40% kept significant symptoms [2].
- Population
- 10,068 children and adolescents in the efficacy analysis of 81 trials [1]; 3,928 children and adolescents in 25 trials [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Short-term trials. There were too few data at 26 and 52 weeks [1].
ADHD in adults, atomoxetine
Shown to reduce ADHD symptoms in adults more than placebo, a small to moderate effect of about 0.4, with more people stopping for side effects.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Atomoxetine lowered clinician-rated ADHD symptoms in adults (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.32) and was less well tolerated than placebo (OR 2.33) [1]. Across 12 trials, symptoms fell on clinician (SMD -0.40) and self ratings (SMD -0.33). Stopping for any reason (OR 1.39) and for adverse events (OR 2.57) was more frequent than on placebo [3].
- Population
- 8,131 adults in the efficacy analysis of 51 adult trials [1]; 3,375 adults in 12 trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [3]
- Caveats
- The authors of [3] described the balance of benefit and risk in adults as poor.
ADHD in children, viloxazine
Shown to raise response in children and adolescents with ADHD about 1.6 times over placebo, about 5.5 points on a symptom scale, with benefit leveling off above 400 mg.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Viloxazine raised the share with a 50% drop on the ADHD Rating Scale (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.93), and raised adverse events and sleepiness [4]. In fixed-dose trials, symptoms improved 5.47 points more than placebo (95% CI 4.03 to 6.91). The dose curve was bell-shaped, with no added benefit above about 400 mg, and effects leveled off at 4 to 6 weeks [5].
- Population
- 1,605 patients in 5 trials [4]; 1,560 children and adolescents, mean age 10.6, in 5 trials [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The two reviews share the same five trials.
Schizophrenia, acute symptoms
Shown to bring at least a minimal response in 51% of people with acute schizophrenia against 30% on placebo, with a higher response threshold met by 23% against 14%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 167 placebo-controlled trials of antipsychotics, the standardized mean difference for overall efficacy was 0.47 (95% credible interval 0.42 to 0.51), falling to 0.38 after accounting for small-trial effects and publication bias. At least a minimal response occurred in 51% against 30% on placebo, and the authors' higher response threshold was met by 23% against 14%. Positive symptoms improved more than negative symptoms or depression [1]. In a network meta-analysis of 32 oral antipsychotics, all reduced overall symptoms more than placebo, with standardized mean differences from -0.89 for clozapine to -0.03 for levomepromazine [2]. The quetiapine label reports that efficacy was established in three 6-week trials in adults and one in adolescents [3].
- Population
- 28,102 mainly chronic participants in 167 trials [1]; 53,463 participants in 402 studies [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- These are class results across many antipsychotics, and the abstracts do not give the figures for quetiapine or aripiprazole alone. Only a minority met the higher response threshold. Industry sponsorship was associated with smaller effect sizes [1].
Depression, added to an antidepressant
Shown to about double the odds of remission when added to an antidepressant in depression that had not responded, with about 1 extra remission per 9 treated.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 16 trials, adding an atypical antipsychotic raised response (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.95) and remission (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.37) against placebo, and people stopped for adverse events more often (OR 3.91, 95% CI 2.68 to 5.72) [8]. A second meta-analysis found remission odds ratios of 2.01 for aripiprazole (95% CI 1.48 to 2.73) and 1.79 for quetiapine (95% CI 1.33 to 2.42), each with a number needed to treat of 9. Effects on clinician-rated depression severity were small to moderate (Hedges' g 0.26 to 0.48) [9].
- Population
- 3,480 patients in 16 trials [8]; adults with treatment-resistant depression in 14 trials of 4 to 12 weeks [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Short trials of 4 to 12 weeks. The band above is the share gaining remission beyond placebo, about 1 in 9. In the aripiprazole add-on trials, restlessness affected 25% against 4% on placebo [10].
Generalized anxiety
Shown to lower generalized anxiety scores by 3.6 points more than placebo on quetiapine, the largest effect in a network meta-analysis, with more dropouts than placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of 89 trials, quetiapine lowered Hamilton anxiety scores by 3.60 points more than placebo (95% credible interval 2.39 to 4.83), the largest effect of 22 drugs, and was poorly tolerated against placebo (OR 1.44, 95% credible interval 1.16 to 1.80) [11]. A pooled analysis of 3 trials found quetiapine gave a 26% greater likelihood of at least 50% improvement on the same scale than placebo [12].
- Population
- 25,441 patients in 89 trials [11]; 3 quetiapine trials within a review of 162 off-label trials [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Not an approved use. The evidence is for quetiapine. Adverse events were common [12].
311 more
Panic disorder
Shown to raise response in panic disorder, with about 4 treated for one extra response in short trials that reviewers rated low quality.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Response was more likely on a benzodiazepine than placebo (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.96), a number needed to treat of 4 (95% CI 3 to 7). Remission was also more likely (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.88), and fewer people dropped out than on placebo (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.64) [1]. In a network meta-analysis, benzodiazepines raised remission against placebo (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.60) and ranked first among drug classes for remission. Adverse events were also more frequent than on placebo (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.06) [2]. In the clonazepam label trials, 74% on 1 mg a day were free of full panic attacks against 56% on placebo in one study, and 62% against 37% in the other [3].
- Population
- 4,233 adults in 24 studies [1]; 12,800 participants in 87 studies of 12 drug classes [2]; adults with panic disorder in two trials of 6 to 9 weeks [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane review rated the evidence low quality and judged 20 of 24 studies at high risk of bias in at least one area [1]. Almost every study in the network analysis had some concern over bias [2]. Trials were short.
Generalized anxiety
Shown to reduce generalized anxiety symptoms more than placebo in short trials, with a moderate effect size of 0.50.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 23 trials, benzodiazepines lowered generalized anxiety symptoms against placebo with an effect size of 0.50, larger than for SSRIs (0.33) or SNRIs (0.36) [4]. In 23 trials of diazepam, lorazepam or alprazolam, fewer people stopped for lack of effect than on placebo (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.45), while stopping for any reason did not clearly differ (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.00) [5]. A network meta-analysis found benzodiazepines lowered anxiety scores more than placebo and had more dropouts than placebo [6].
- Population
- 1,149 participants on benzodiazepines in 23 trials, within 56 studies of 12,655 adults [4]; 23 trials against placebo [5]; 25,441 adult outpatients in 89 trials [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Effect sizes fell with later year of publication [4], and year of publication explained 74% of the variation between trials [5]. The trials were short. The lorazepam and diazepam labels state that use beyond 4 months has not been assessed [7][8].
Insomnia
Shown to lengthen sleep by about an hour and shorten the time to fall asleep by 4 to 20 minutes in short trials, with more daytime drowsiness.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against placebo, benzodiazepines increased total sleep duration by 61.8 minutes (95% CI 37.4 to 86.2). Sleep latency on sleep records fell by 4.2 minutes, which was not significant, and by 14.3 minutes in patients' own estimates [9]. A later meta-analysis found sleep latency fell by 10.0 minutes on sleep-lab recordings (95% CI 3.4 to 16.6) and 19.6 minutes in sleep diaries, with a higher risk of harm than placebo (risk difference 0.15) [10]. A network meta-analysis found benzodiazepines among the drugs that beat placebo for acute insomnia, and among those with more side effects than placebo [11]. In people over 60, sedatives added 25.2 minutes of sleep and a small gain in sleep quality (effect size 0.14) [12].
- Population
- Randomized trials of benzodiazepines for insomnia [9]; 105 studies of drugs for chronic insomnia [10]; 44,089 participants in 154 trials of 30 drugs [11]; 2,417 people aged 60 and older in 24 studies [12].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11], [12], [7]
- Caveats
- The pooled trials cover benzodiazepines as a class, including sleep drugs outside this page, and the abstracts do not break results down by drug. Of the four labels cited here, only lorazepam's mentions insomnia, as insomnia due to anxiety or passing stress [7]. Trials were short. See rebound insomnia under Risks.
Migraine in adults, compared with a waiting list
Shown to reduce migraine frequency and severity against a waiting list in two meta-analyses, with effects lasting more than a year in follow-up.
Compared with waiting list [2]; control conditions the source abstract does not describe [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 55 studies, all biofeedback approaches together gave a medium effect (d 0.58, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.64) that held over an average 17 months of follow-up, and outcomes improved more with biofeedback than with control conditions. Attack frequency improved most, and blood-volume-pulse feedback gave larger effects than skin temperature or muscle feedback [3]. A 2025 review of 9 trials (558 participants) found biofeedback reduced headache frequency and severity against a waiting list [2].
- Population
- 55 studies, including randomized trials and before-and-after studies [3]. Adults with migraine in 9 randomized trials [2].
- Sources
- [3], [2]
- Caveats
- The 2007 analysis included before-and-after studies with no control group [3]. A waiting list cannot control for attention or expectation.
Depression in adults
Shown to raise response in adult depression, 62% against 51% on placebo in seven pooled trials, level with SSRIs.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In original data from seven trials, response was 62% on bupropion, 63% on SSRIs and 51% on placebo, and remission was 47%, 47% and 36% [1]. Across 522 trials of 21 antidepressants that included bupropion, every drug had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13 [2]. A systematic review of 51 studies found the more robust trials favored bupropion over placebo and most head-to-head trials showed effects equal to other antidepressants [3].
- Population
- Adults with major depression in 7 randomized trials comparing bupropion, SSRIs and placebo [1]; 116,477 adults in 522 trials [2]; 51 studies of bupropion as an antidepressant [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Smaller and older studies of bupropion showed larger effects against placebo [2]. The evidence is thinner in people with a first episode who have never been treated [3]. Most trials lasted weeks.
Quitting smoking
Shown to raise smoking quit rates about 1.6 times over placebo, roughly 3 extra quitters per 100, and less than varenicline did.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Bupropion raised quit rates against placebo or no drug (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.49 to 1.72, 50 studies) [4]. In a network meta-analysis the odds ratio against control was 1.43 (95% CrI 1.26 to 1.62), which the authors put at 3 additional quitters per 100 (95% CrI 2 to 4) [5]. In a trial of 8,144 smokers, abstinence was more likely on bupropion than placebo (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.45) and more likely on varenicline than bupropion (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.01) [6]. Quit rates on bupropion were lower than on varenicline (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and similar to single-form nicotine replacement (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13) [4].
- Population
- 18,577 participants in 50 studies, mostly adults from the community or cessation clinics [4]; 14,759 participants in 71 RCTs of bupropion within a 319-trial network [5]; 8,144 smokers with and without psychiatric disorders [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Both reviews rated the bupropion evidence high certainty. 118 of the trials in the network reported drug or tobacco industry funding [5].
Generalized anxiety
Shown to reduce generalized anxiety symptoms more than placebo, with about 4 to 5 treated for one extra person improved in trials of 4 to 9 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In generalized anxiety disorder, azapirones, the drug group that buspirone belongs to, lowered anxiety scores more than placebo (MD -4.91, 95% CI -5.91 to -3.90, 22 studies) and raised response (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.86, 9 studies) [1]. A Cochrane review found azapirones, including buspirone, superior to placebo, with a number needed to treat of 4.4 (95% CI 2.16 to 15.4) on a global improvement scale [2]. In a network meta-analysis of drugs for generalized anxiety, buspirone beat placebo, in a small sample [3].
- Population
- 2,567 participants in 22 placebo-controlled studies, within a review of 70 studies [1]; 5,908 participants in 36 trials lasting 4 to 9 weeks, one lasting 14 [2]; 25,441 adult outpatients in 89 trials of 22 drugs [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The pooled figures are for azapirones as a group. The label states that benefit beyond 3 to 4 weeks has not been shown in controlled trials [4], and the Cochrane authors called for longer studies [2].
Attention and alertness under sleep loss
Shown to improve attention, reaction time and driving lane control in sleep-deprived adults, compared with sleep loss without caffeine.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 45 publications in sleep-deprived or sleep-restricted people, caffeine improved attention response time (g 0.86), attention accuracy (g 0.68, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.88), executive function (g 0.35, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.55), reaction time (g 1.11, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.47) and driving lane control (g 1.67, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.02) [7]. In 7 placebo-controlled trials in military personnel under sleep loss, caffeine improved vigilance and response performance (SMD 0.73, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.96), complex cognitive performance (0.54, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.93) and military task performance (0.45, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.71) [8].
- Population
- Sleep-deprived or restricted adults, 327 effect estimates [7]. Military personnel in 7 randomized trials [8].
- Sources
- [3], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The pooled effects are against a sleep-deprived baseline, not a rested one. The abstract's confidence interval for attention response time (0.53 to 0.83) does not contain its point estimate (0.86), which suggests a typo in the source.
Attention when rested
Shown to improve attention accuracy and reaction time slightly in rested adults, more at doses of 200 mg or more.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 31 trials (1,455 participants) in the general population, caffeine improved attention accuracy (g 0.27) and reaction time (g 0.28). Doses of 200 mg or more improved both more than lower doses. Reaction time kept improving with dose, while accuracy rose and then fell [9]. In 14 studies (250 participants) aged 20 or younger, caffeine improved cognitive task performance (SMD 0.41, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.55) [10].
- Population
- Adults from the general population [9]. Children, adolescents and young adults up to age 20 [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Effects were small. The youth meta-analysis rests on small-sample studies [10]. Habitual caffeine intake did not change the effect in either review [9][10].
Seizures in Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes
Shown to cut seizures in Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes, with drop seizures falling about 42% against 17% to 22% on placebo. These trials used prescription CBD.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 120 children and young adults with Dravet syndrome, 20 mg/kg a day for 14 weeks cut median monthly convulsive seizures from 12.4 to 5.9, against 14.9 to 14.1 with placebo (adjusted median difference -22.8 percentage points, 95% CI -41.1 to -5.4) [1]. In 225 patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, drop seizures fell by a median 41.9% at 20 mg/kg and 37.2% at 10 mg/kg, against 17.2% with placebo [2]. In a second Lennox-Gastaut trial of 171 patients, drop seizures fell 43.9% with 20 mg/kg against 21.8% with placebo (median difference -17.21, 95% CI -30.32 to -4.09) [3]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 7 RCTs (1,154 participants) found a pooled seizure frequency risk ratio of 0.72 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.73) against placebo, consistent across Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and tuberous sclerosis complex. Transdermal CBD showed no short-term effect [4]. Across 46 studies (5 RCTs, 2,592 patients) in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, 49.9% (95% CI 44.9 to 55.0) had seizures cut by half or more and 5.7% became seizure-free [5].
- Population
- Patients aged 2 to 55 with drug-resistant seizures, on top of existing antiepileptic drugs [1][2][3]. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy [4] and developmental and epileptic encephalopathies of any age [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- All three pivotal trials were funded by GW Pharmaceuticals, the maker of Epidiolex [1][2][3]. Most studies in [5] were not randomized, and heterogeneity was substantial. They tested purified prescription CBD, not retail products. Seizure freedom was 5% vs 0% in Dravet syndrome (p = 0.08) [1].
Preventing migraine with the antibodies
Shown to reduce migraine by about 1.6 days a month more than placebo, a small effect that a meta-analysis rated high certainty.
Compared with placebo injections or infusions [1][2][3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 12 trials, the antibodies reduced monthly migraine days by 1.64 more than placebo (95% CI 1.28 to 1.99), a small effect size (Cohen's d -0.25), with high certainty [1]. A network meta-analysis of 16 trials in episodic migraine found the largest effect for galcanezumab 240 mg (SMD 0.50) and the highest odds of a 50% drop in migraine days for fremanezumab 225 mg (OR 3.17) [2]. In a likelihood to help or harm analysis of phase 3 trials, every antibody dose was more likely to help than to cause stopping for side effects [3].
- Population
- 12 antibody trials in adults [1]; 9,123 participants in 16 trials of episodic migraine [2]; phase 3 trials in episodic and chronic migraine [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Trials mostly ran 3 to 6 months. The rankings between antibodies come from indirect comparison [2].
Treating a migraine attack with gepants
Shown to leave about 20% pain free 2 hours after rimegepant or ubrogepant, against 11% to 13% on placebo, about 1 extra pain-free person in 10 treated.
Compared with placebo [8][9][10]; triptans, indirectly [10]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Two hours after rimegepant 75 mg, 19.8% were pain free against 10.7% on placebo (RR 1.93, number needed to treat 10), and 14.2% against 6.3% stayed pain free through 24 hours (number needed to treat 11) [8]. On ubrogepant, 20.8% were pain free at 2 hours against 12.6% (RR 1.65), and 37.3% against 27.6% were free of their most bothersome symptom [9]. A network meta-analysis found rimegepant and ubrogepant beat placebo, and that most triptans had higher odds of pain freedom than either [10].
- Population
- 6,734 adults in 7 rimegepant trials [8]; 3,326 adults in 3 ubrogepant trials [9]; 46,442 participants in 64 trials [10].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Each trial treated a single attack. The comparison with triptans was indirect [10].
ADHD in children and teenagers
Shown to reduce ADHD symptoms in children and teenagers against placebo, by a standardized difference of about 0.6 to 0.7 for clonidine and guanfacine.
Compared with placebo [4][5][6][7]; amphetamines, methylphenidate, atomoxetine and modafinil, in network comparisons [4]; placebo added to stimulants [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis at about 12 weeks, clinician-rated ADHD symptoms improved more than placebo with clonidine (SMD -0.71, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.24) and guanfacine (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.50). Teacher ratings for guanfacine did not clearly differ from placebo (SMD -0.63, 95% CI -1.62 to 0.35). Guanfacine was less well tolerated than placebo (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.20 to 5.81) [4]. Another meta-analysis found alpha-2 agonists alone reduced overall symptoms (SMD -0.59) and, added to stimulants, by a smaller amount (SMD -0.36). Alone, they had fewer all-cause discontinuations than placebo (RR 0.70, NNT 10) [5].
- Population
- 10,068 children and adolescents in the efficacy analysis of 133 trials, with no adult trials of clonidine or guanfacine found [4]; 2,276 young people in 12 trials [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality was moderate for both drugs against placebo [4]. Amphetamines (SMD -1.02) and methylphenidate (SMD -0.78) had larger point estimates against placebo in the same analysis [4].
Depression, compared with waiting list or usual care
Shown to lower depression moderately to largely against waiting list and usual care, with effects still present 6 to 12 months later.
Compared with care as usual and waiting list [3]; control groups [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 409 trials, CBT outperformed control conditions such as care as usual and waiting list (g 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89), and the effect was still significant at 6 to 12 months. As unguided self-help it gave g 0.45, and in children and adolescents g 0.41 [3]. An earlier analysis of 75 studies found g 0.71 (number needed to treat 2.6), which was 0.53 after adjusting for publication bias and 0.53 in higher-quality studies [4].
- Population
- 52,702 patients in 409 trials (518 comparisons) [3]. 115 studies of adults with depression [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Waiting-list controls inflate effects, and the earlier analysis found strong signs of publication bias [4]. Both analyses come from the same research group and share trials.
Anxiety disorders, compared with placebo
Shown to ease anxiety disorder symptoms moderately against pill or psychological placebo, with nearly three times the odds of responding.
Compared with psychological placebo [6][7]; pill placebo [6][7]; waiting list [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against psychological or pill placebo, CBT reduced target disorder symptoms (Hedges' g 0.56), other anxiety symptoms (g 0.38), depression (g 0.31) and improved quality of life (g 0.30). The odds of responding were 2.97 times those on placebo. Effects were large for obsessive compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and acute stress disorder, and small to moderate for PTSD, social anxiety and panic disorder [6]. In a second analysis, individual CBT outperformed waiting list, psychological placebo and pill placebo [7].
- Population
- 2,843 patients in 41 placebo-controlled trials [6]. 37,333 patients in 234 trials of panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and social phobia [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Effects were larger in completers than in intention-to-treat samples [6]. Patients know they are receiving therapy, which a pill placebo cannot match.
Insomnia
Shown to cut time to fall asleep by about 19 minutes and time awake at night by about 26 minutes against inactive comparisons, with little change in total sleep time.
Compared with inactive comparators [9]; no treatment [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After face-to-face CBT for insomnia, sleep onset latency improved by 19.03 minutes (95% CI 14.12 to 23.93), wake after sleep onset by 26.00 minutes, and sleep efficiency by 9.91%. Total sleep time rose 7.61 minutes, a change that was not significant (95% CI -0.51 to 15.74) [9]. Across 87 trials, insomnia severity improved (g 0.98), as did sleep efficiency (g 0.71) and sleep quality (g 0.40). The smallest effect was on total sleep time (g 0.16) [10].
- Population
- 1,162 adults with chronic insomnia, 64% women, mean age 56, in 20 trials [9]. 3,724 treated patients and 2,579 controls in 87 trials [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Sleep was mostly measured by diary. The first analysis excluded insomnia alongside other medical, sleep or psychiatric disorders [9].
Depression and anxiety, online or computer CBT
Shown to lower depression and anxiety disorder symptoms against control conditions, with guided programs ahead of unguided ones right after treatment.
Compared with control treatments [13]; care as usual, waiting list, information control, psychological placebo or pill placebo [14]; face-to-face CBT [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In individual data from 39 trials, guided and unguided internet CBT lowered depression scores more than control treatments in the short and long term. Guided programs were ahead of unguided ones after treatment (PHQ-9 mean difference -0.8, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.2) and not at 6 or 12 months [13]. Across 64 trials in major depression, panic disorder, social anxiety and generalized anxiety, computer or internet CBT outperformed control groups (g 0.80, number needed to treat 2.34). Nine trials comparing it with face-to-face CBT found them equally beneficial [14].
- Population
- 9,751 people with depression in 39 trials [13]. 64 trials in adults meeting diagnostic criteria [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Few trials compared online CBT with medication [14].
Memory and cognition
Shown to improve memory scores modestly, most in older adults, with no change in people aged 11 to 31.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pooled across 8 RCTs, memory scores improved over placebo with an SMD of 0.29 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.53, I² 66%). In adults aged 66 to 76 the SMD was 0.88 (95% CI 0.22 to 1.55, I² 83%). In people aged 11 to 31 it was 0.03 (95% CI -0.14 to 0.20) [9]. Across 16 RCTs (492 participants), creatine improved memory (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44, moderate certainty), attention time and processing speed time, and did not change overall cognition or executive function [10]. A systematic review of 6 studies in 1,542 adults aged 55 and over found 5 reported a positive link between creatine and cognition, mostly memory and attention [11].
- Population
- Healthy people, 10 RCTs reviewed and 8 pooled, doses 2.2 to 20 g a day for 5 days to 24 weeks [9]; adults aged 20.8 to 76.4, healthy and with specific diseases [10]; older adults, 2 supplement trials and 4 diet surveys [11].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was high in [9]. The reviews disagree on who benefits: [9] found the effect in older adults and none at 11 to 31, while [10] found more benefit at 18 to 60, in women and in people with diseases. Only memory reached moderate certainty, and the other domains were low [10]. In the older adult review, 4 of 6 studies were cross-sectional diet surveys and 3 were rated poor quality [11].
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, against warfarin
Shown to cut stroke or systemic embolism by about 19% and death by about 10% against warfarin in adults with atrial fibrillation.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across the four pivotal trials, DOACs lowered stroke or systemic embolism by 19% against warfarin (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.91), mainly through fewer hemorrhagic strokes (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.64), and lowered death from any cause (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.95) [1]. In patient-level data from the same trials, stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 3.01% on a standard-dose DOAC against 3.69% on warfarin (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89) and death in 7.76% against 8.42% (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97) [2]. By trial, the yearly rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 1.11% on dabigatran 150 mg against 1.69% on warfarin [3], 1.7% on rivaroxaban against 2.2% [4], 1.27% on apixaban against 1.60% [5] and 1.18% on high-dose edoxaban against 1.50% [6].
- Population
- 71,683 participants in four trials, 42,411 on a DOAC and 29,272 on warfarin [1][2]; 18,113 patients [3]; 14,264 patients [4]; 18,201 patients [5]; 21,105 patients [6].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Lower-dose regimens did not lower stroke or systemic embolism against warfarin (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.19) [2] and were followed by more ischemic strokes (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.60) [1]. Both meta-analyses pool the same four manufacturer-funded trials. The trials enrolled nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Stroke
Linked to 10% lower stroke at the highest fish intake than the lowest, and 6% lower for each 3 extra servings a week, in pooled cohorts.
Compared with the lowest fish intake category [8]; 3 fewer servings a week, in a dose-response model [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 33 cohorts, the highest against the lowest fish intake was linked to lower stroke (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96), with stronger links for hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.88), women (HR 0.83) and Asia-Pacific cohorts (HR 0.87). Risk was 2% to 12% lower with intakes up to 100 to 700 g a week [8]. Across 15 cohorts, 3 extra servings a week were linked to 6% lower total stroke (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.99), 0.90 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.97) for ischemic stroke and 0.90 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.06) for hemorrhagic stroke [9].
- Population
- 33 prospective cohorts [8]. 383,838 participants and 9,360 strokes in 15 cohorts [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Observational. One review rated its evidence moderate by NutriGrade [8], and the other described the link as weak [9]. The two reviews differ on hemorrhagic stroke.
Memory, cognitive decline and dementia
Linked to 18% lower cognitive impairment and 18% lower dementia at the highest fish intake than the lowest, in pooled observational studies of adults.
Compared with the lowest fish intake [14]; one fewer serving a week, in a dose-response model [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 35 studies, the highest against the lowest fish intake was linked to lower cognitive impairment or decline (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.90), dementia (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93) and Alzheimer disease (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.96). Risk of cognitive impairment was up to 30% lower at 150 g a day (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.95) [14]. Across 21 cohorts, each extra weekly serving of fish was linked to 5% lower dementia (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99) and 7% lower Alzheimer disease (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.95) [15].
- Population
- 35 observational studies [14]. 181,580 participants and 4,438 cases followed 2.1 to 21 years [15].
- Sources
- [14], [15]
- Caveats
- Observational, with heterogeneity up to I² 61.1% [14] and 74.8% [15]. The authors of the newer review call for further studies on dementia and Alzheimer disease [14]. People with early memory loss may change their diet, which can run the link backward. Day-to-day focus and attention in adults were not the outcomes measured.
Depression
Linked to 17% to 22% lower risk of depression at the highest fish intake than the lowest, in pooled observational studies.
Compared with the lowest fish consumption [16][17]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 26 studies, the pooled relative risk of depression for the highest against the lowest fish consumption was 0.83 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.93), and 0.84 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.94) in the 10 cohort studies [16]. Across 21 datasets, it was 0.78 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.89), with a linear dose-response [17].
- Population
- 150,278 participants in 26 studies [16]. 255,076 individuals and over 20,000 cases of depression in 31 studies [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Observational, and 16 of the 26 studies in one review were cross-sectional [16]. The other review notes possible confounding from variables the studies did not adjust for [17]. Low mood can change diet, which can run the link backward.
Stroke and cardiovascular disease
Shown to lower stroke about 10% in adults, with no change in coronary heart disease. Effects were larger in people with low blood folate.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 30 RCTs with 82,334 participants, folic acid lowered stroke (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.96) and overall cardiovascular disease (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99). Coronary heart disease did not change (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.09) [3]. In the largest single trial, first stroke occurred in 2.7% on enalapril plus folic acid and 3.4% on enalapril alone (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.93) [4]. A Cochrane review of B vitamin trials found the same 10% stroke reduction and no change in heart attack [5].
- Population
- Adults with and without cardiovascular disease [3][5]; 20,702 adults with high blood pressure in China, median 4.5 years [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Stroke and overall cardiovascular effects were larger in people with lower blood folate at baseline and without existing cardiovascular disease [3]. The Chinese trial gave folic acid with enalapril and compared it with enalapril alone [4].
Nerve pain after shingles
Shown to give at least 50% pain relief to about 32% of people with postherpetic neuralgia, against 13% to 17% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- With gabapentin at 1,200 mg a day or more, 32% had substantial benefit against 17% on placebo (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.1, number needed to treat 6.7), and 46% had moderate benefit against 25% (number needed to treat 4.8) [1]. With pregabalin 300 mg a day, 32% had at least 50% pain reduction against 13% on placebo (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.9 to 3.4, number needed to treat 5.3). With 600 mg a day it was 41% against 15% (RR 2.7, 95% CI 2.0 to 3.5, number needed to treat 3.9) [2].
- Population
- 2,260 participants in 8 gabapentin studies of 4 to 12 weeks [1]; 713 and 732 participants in 4 pregabalin studies at each dose [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Both reviews rated the evidence moderate quality. Most people did not reach 50% relief on either drug.
Diabetic nerve pain
Shown to give at least 50% pain relief to 38% on gabapentin against 21% on placebo, and to 31% on pregabalin 300 mg against 24%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- With gabapentin at 1,200 mg a day or more, 38% had substantial benefit against 21% on placebo (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.3, number needed to treat 5.9), and 52% had moderate benefit against 37% (number needed to treat 6.6) [1]. With pregabalin 300 mg a day, 31% had at least 50% pain reduction against 24% on placebo (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.5), and 47% had at least 30% reduction against 42% (number needed to treat 22). With 600 mg a day, 41% had at least 50% reduction against 28% (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.7, number needed to treat 7.8) [2].
- Population
- 1,277 participants in 6 gabapentin studies [1]; 2,931 participants in 11 studies of pregabalin 300 mg and 1,015 in 5 studies of 600 mg [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Gabapentin is not FDA-approved for diabetic nerve pain. The pregabalin effect at 300 mg was small, and the 600 mg evidence was rated low quality. The review found an absence of efficacy for pregabalin in HIV neuropathy [2].
Partial seizures, added to other seizure medicine
Shown to about double the share of people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy whose seizures fell by half, for both gabapentin and pregabalin as add-on treatment.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Added to other seizure medicine, gabapentin raised the chance of a 50% or greater fall in seizure frequency (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.55), with 25.3% responding at 1,800 mg a day against 9.7% on placebo [5]. Pregabalin raised it by a similar amount (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.72) and was associated with seizure freedom (RR 3.94, 95% CI 1.50 to 10.37). The odds of response doubled from 300 mg to 600 mg a day. In one head-to-head trial, response did not differ between pregabalin and gabapentin (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.12) [6].
- Population
- 1,206 participants in 6 gabapentin trials [5]; 2,663 participants in 9 placebo-controlled pregabalin trials [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Certainty was rated low to moderate. People left pregabalin treatment for adverse effects more often than placebo (RR 2.60, 95% CI 1.86 to 3.64) [6].
Anxiety
Shown to reduce symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder more than placebo on pregabalin, by about 2.8 points on the Hamilton anxiety scale.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 8 trials, pregabalin reduced anxiety symptoms more than placebo (Hedges' g 0.37, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.44), with no difference in dropout rates [11]. In a network meta-analysis, pregabalin lowered Hamilton anxiety scores by 2.79 points more than placebo (95% credible interval 1.91 to 3.69), and was among the better-tolerated drugs in the analysis [12]. A further review found a consistent but not universal effect of gabapentinoids across anxiety conditions, and that pregabalin (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.18) and gabapentin (SMD -0.92, 95% CI -1.32 to -0.52) reduced anxiety before surgery [13].
- Population
- 2,299 participants in 8 trials [11]; 25,441 patients in 89 trials of 22 drugs [12]; 55 double-blind trials across bipolar disorder, anxiety and insomnia [13].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Not an FDA-approved use for either drug. The generalized anxiety evidence is for pregabalin. For gabapentin the evidence is mainly from anxiety before surgery [13].
Depressive symptoms
Shown to reduce depressive symptoms with gardening and horticultural activities in two meta-analyses of trials, a moderate effect. A third found no significant mental health change in chronic illness.
Compared with comparison groups with no horticultural element [1]; control groups in randomized trials the abstract does not describe [2]; control groups in randomized and quasi-experimental studies [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Horticultural activities reduced depressive symptoms (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.47, I² 54%), with similar effects in younger and older adults, indoors and outdoors, and once or twice a week [1]. Group-based gardening may reduce depressive symptoms, with uncertainty from heterogeneity and unclear risk of bias [2]. In adults with chronic conditions, the pooled effect on mental health was not significant (SMD -0.31, 95% CI -0.97 to 0.34) [3].
- Population
- 2,071 community-dwelling adults in 30 studies, 25 pooled [1]. 20 completed randomized trials [2]. 4,535 adults with chronic conditions in 23 studies, mean age 54.4 [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Participants knew they were gardening, and most studies had a high risk of bias [1]. Programs often bundled gardening with group contact and time outdoors, so the share due to gardening is unknown.
Wellbeing and quality of life
Shown to raise wellbeing and other health measures with gardening in two meta-analyses, moderate effects, across trials and comparisons of gardeners with non-gardeners.
Compared with the same people before they began gardening, or non-gardeners [4]; comparison groups in the interventional and observational reviews it pooled [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 76 comparisons, gardening had a positive effect on health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, body mass index, life satisfaction, quality of life and sense of community (mean effect 0.42, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.48), which held after adjusting for publication bias [4]. Gardening and horticultural therapy raised wellbeing (effect size 0.55, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.87) [5].
- Population
- 22 studies published after 2001, mostly from the US [4]. 40 reviews [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was significant (I² 40.47%) and publication bias was present [4]. The umbrella review pooled earlier reviews that overlap, and its authors caution against clinical conclusions [5].
Cognition in cognitive impairment or dementia
Shown to raise cognition scores slightly in people with cognitive impairment or dementia, below the threshold for clinical significance.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 8 RCTs of people with subjective memory impairment, mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease, ginseng raised MMSE scores by 0.68 points (95% CI 0.03 to 1.32, I² 66%) and lowered ADAS-cog scores by 1.10 points (95% CI -1.82 to -0.38, I² 0%) [1]. In 9 studies of 617 older adults with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease or dementia, MMSE rose 0.38 points (95% CI 0.03 to 0.74) and ADAS-cog fell 2.21 points (95% CI -3.97 to -0.44) [2].
- Population
- Adults with memory or cognitive impairment [1]. 617 older adults with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease or dementia [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The authors of [2] report that the gains did not reach the threshold for clinical significance, and note few studies and moderate heterogeneity. MMSE heterogeneity in [1] was 66%. Review [2] searched Chinese databases.
Eye, kidney and nerve complications of diabetes
Shown in trials: intensive glucose control that lowered HbA1c about 0.9 points cut kidney events 20% and eye events 13% in type 2 diabetes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an individual-participant meta-analysis of 4 trials in type 2 diabetes, more intensive control left HbA1c 0.90 percentage points lower (95% CI 0.58 to 1.22) and reduced kidney events (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.88) and eye events (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.00), with no reduction in nerve events (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.09) [11]. In type 1 diabetes, intensive therapy reduced the development of retinopathy by 76% (95% CI 62 to 85) and clinical neuropathy by 60% (95% CI 38 to 74) [12]. In an observational analysis of people with type 2 diabetes, each 1% lower updated mean HbA1c went with 37% fewer microvascular complications (95% CI 33 to 41), with no threshold [13]. In pooled data from nine studies, diabetes-specific retinopathy was rare below 6.0% and its threshold fell at 6.3 to 6.7% [14].
- Population
- 27,049 adults with type 2 diabetes in 4 trials, median follow-up 5.0 years [11]. 1,441 people with type 1 diabetes followed a mean 6.5 years [12]. 3,642 people with type 2 diabetes [13]. 28,010 people with HbA1c and retinal photographs [14].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- The trials tested treatment strategies, not HbA1c itself. Intensive therapy raised severe hypoglycemia two to threefold in the type 1 diabetes trial [12].
Chronic pain
Shown to ease chronic pain moderately (Hedges' g -0.42) against control treatments, with larger effects after 8 or more sessions.
Compared with control interventions the source abstract does not describe [13]; standard care, and other psychological interventions [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In chronic musculoskeletal and nerve pain, hypnosis lowered pain intensity (Hedges' g -0.42 after treatment, -0.37 at short-term follow-up) and pain interference (-0.39). With 8 or more sessions the effect was g -0.555, and with fewer it was smaller and not significant [13]. An earlier meta-analysis found a moderate benefit over standard care, and a moderate benefit over other psychological treatments in people with pain other than headache [14].
- Population
- 530 adults in 9 trials [13]. Trials in chronic pain [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity across trials was large [14].
Depression, intravenous ketamine
Shown to lower depression scores within 24 hours more than placebo, with racemic ketamine's effect lasting into follow-up in a meta-analysis of 49 trials. Used off-label.
Compared with saline placebo or midazolam [1]; placebo or active control in pooled trials [2][3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Cochrane review, ketamine raised response and remission at 24 hours over placebo (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.54 to 10.10) and lowered depression scores (SMD -0.87, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.48), in very low-certainty evidence [1]. Across 49 trials, a first high dose of racemic ketamine lowered depression severity by SMD -0.73 (95% CI -0.91 to -0.56) against control. Effects stayed significant during repeated dosing (SMD -0.61) and at follow-up after the last dose (SMD -0.65), and higher doses did more than low doses [2]. An earlier meta-analysis found larger response and remission ratios for racemic ketamine (RR 3.01 and 3.70) than for esketamine (RR 1.38 and 1.47) [3].
- Population
- 31 ketamine trials within 64 studies and 5,299 adults with unipolar depression [1]; 3,299 participants in 49 trials [2]; 1,877 participants in 24 trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Most ketamine trials gave one dose and measured hours to days later [1]. Dissociation makes blinding hard, and heterogeneity ran up to 87.6% [2]. Not an FDA-approved use.
Suicidal thoughts
Shown to reduce suicidal thoughts within a day of a single ketamine infusion, an effect lasting up to 3 days. The esketamine label states no reduction in suicide was shown.
Compared with saline or midazolam [7]; control infusions [8]; placebo spray added to standard care [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In individual data from 10 trials, one infusion reduced suicidal ideation within 1 day and for up to 1 week, with effect sizes of d = 0.48 to 0.85, partly independent of mood changes [7]. Across 15 trials, suicidal ideation scores fell at 4 hours (SMD -0.51) and 24 to 72 hours (SMD -0.57), but not after, with almost no data on suicidal behavior [8]. In two esketamine trials in people with active suicidal intent, depression scores fell 3.8 to 3.9 points more than placebo at 24 hours, but clinician-rated suicidality did not differ [4].
- Population
- 167 adults with suicidal ideation at baseline [7]; 572 adults in 15 trials [8]; 449 hospitalized adults with major depression and suicidal intent [4].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [4]
- Caveats
- Short follow-up and marked heterogeneity [8]. The esketamine label states effectiveness in preventing suicide or reducing suicidal ideation or behavior has not been demonstrated [4].
Seizures in drug-resistant epilepsy
Shown to make a 50% seizure reduction about 5.8 times as likely as usual care in children with drug-resistant epilepsy, on low-certainty evidence, with adult results uncertain.
Compared with usual care [8]; control groups the source does not describe [9]; a further antiseizure medicine [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In children, ketogenic diets made seizure freedom more likely than usual care (RR 3.16, 95% CI 1.20 to 8.35, 4 studies, 385 participants) and a 50% or greater seizure reduction more likely (RR 5.80, 95% CI 3.48 to 9.65). Up to 55% of children were seizure free after 3 months on a classic 4:1 diet. In adults, no participant became seizure free, and seizure reduction was uncertain (RR 5.03, 95% CI 0.26 to 97.68, 2 studies, 141 participants) [8]. In 6 of 14 RCTs in children and adolescents, seizures fell by more than 50% against control over 3 to 4 months [9]. In 136 infants aged 1 to 24 months, seizures per day did not differ from a further antiseizure medicine at 8 weeks (IRR 1.33, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.11) [10].
- Population
- 932 participants in 13 studies, 711 children aged 4 months to 18 years and 221 adults [8]; 1,114 children and adolescents in 14 RCTs [9]; infants at 19 UK hospitals [10].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- All 13 Cochrane studies were at high risk of bias from lack of blinding, and certainty was low to very low [8]. These are medically supervised diets in people whose seizures continued on medication. The infant trial ended early, and three infants on the diet died during it, deaths the investigators judged unrelated to treatment [10].
Attention and reaction time
Shown to improve choice reaction time in the hour after a single 200 mg dose in adults. Simple reaction time and the Stroop test did not change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 31 RCTs (1,168 participants), a single 200 mg dose taken 30 to 60 minutes before testing improved choice reaction time (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.77) [1]. A separate meta-analysis of healthy participants found theanine alone improved choice reaction time in the first hour (SMD -0.35, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.10), and theanine plus caffeine improved some attention-task accuracy in the second hour [2]. A third meta-analysis of 5 RCTs (148 healthy adults) found faster rapid visual information processing and recognition reaction time (MD -15.20 ms, 95% CI -28.99 to -1.41), and no difference in simple reaction time or the Stroop test [3].
- Population
- Healthy and clinical populations [1]. Healthy participants only [2][3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The second review notes the confidence intervals often left the direction and size of effects uncertain [2]. The third pooled only 5 trials of varied products, and simple reaction time and Stroop results did not differ [3]. The reviews agree on choice and recognition reaction time, not on every attention test. Many trials pair theanine with caffeine.
Preventing mood episodes in bipolar disorder
Shown to lower relapse in bipolar disorder against placebo, by about 16% to 22% in pooled trials, while preventing mania less well than lithium.
Compared with placebo [1][2][3][4]; lithium [1][2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Cochrane review, clinical worsening that needed added treatment was less likely on lamotrigine than placebo (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.98), and so was a return of manic symptoms at one year (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.87). Against lithium, manic symptoms returned more often on lamotrigine (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.44), while fewer people had at least one adverse effect (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.96) [1]. A second meta-analysis found a lower relapse or recurrence rate than placebo (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.99) and no difference from lithium (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.25) [2]. A third found fewer new depressive episodes than on placebo (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.98) [3]. In the two 18-month label trials, lamotrigine delayed the next mood episode, and a combined analysis found the effect stronger for depression than for mania [4].
- Population
- 2,314 adults with bipolar disorder in 11 trials, 1,146 on lamotrigine [1]; 20 RCTs and 20 cohort studies, 1,166 lamotrigine users in the RCTs [2]; 24 trials with 2,257 patients and 2,320 controls [3]; adults with bipolar I disorder stabilized on lamotrigine and then randomized for up to 18 months [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane review rated the evidence low to moderate certainty and found unclear risk of bias in every study [1]. The main trials enrolled only people who had already responded to lamotrigine before randomization [4].
Bipolar depression
Shown to improve bipolar depression modestly against placebo, with response about 1.27 times as likely, and in one pooled analysis only in more severe depression.
Compared with placebo [5][2][3][6]; lithium, olanzapine with fluoxetine, citalopram and inositol [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In individual data from five trials, response on the Hamilton depression scale was more likely on lamotrigine than placebo (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.47). The gain was seen in people with Hamilton scores above 24 (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.87) and not in those at 24 or below (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.27) [5]. Added to other treatment, lamotrigine lowered depression scores more than placebo (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.10) [2]. As a single drug it beat placebo by a small margin (SMD 0.155, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.305) [3]. Across unipolar and bipolar trials pooled together, response was more likely than on placebo (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.78), and lamotrigine did not differ from lithium, olanzapine with fluoxetine, citalopram or inositol [6].
- Population
- 1,072 adults in five placebo-controlled trials [5]; trials within 20 RCTs [2]; 24 trials [3]; 18 studies with 2,152 people, 14 of them in bipolar depression [6].
- Sources
- [5], [2], [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The pooled effects are small. The label states that effectiveness in acute mood episodes has not been established and lamotrigine is not approved for this use [4].
Eye masks for sleep in hospital
Shown to improve rated sleep quality in intensive care patients using eye masks, alone or with earplugs, in three reviews. Earplugs alone did not change sleep quality.
Compared with control groups in randomized trials the abstract does not describe [1]; control groups, including routine care, in randomized and nonrandomized studies [2]; comparison conditions the abstract does not describe [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Earplugs and eye masks together or apart improved self-reported sleep quality (SMD 1.44, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.09). Eye masks alone had a large effect (1.56, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.05), both together the largest (2.08, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.21), and earplugs alone none (0.07, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.64) [1]. Eye masks and earplugs improved sleep questionnaire scores, and polysomnography showed more total sleep time, higher sleep efficiency, more REM sleep and fewer awakenings and arousals [2]. Most of 19 studies showed better subjective sleep quality, while objective measures were not consistently improved [3].
- Population
- 797 adult ICU patients in 13 randomized trials [1]. 2,687 participants in 35 studies, 21 pooled [2]. 1,379 participants in 19 ICU and non-ICU studies [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Patients in intensive care, where light and noise at night are far above home levels. Masks cannot be blinded, and sleep quality was mostly self-rated with tools that varied between studies [3].
Stress and distress in people without a diagnosis, against no program
Shown to lower anxiety, depression and distress in adults without a diagnosis, by about half a standard deviation, against no program or a waiting list.
Compared with no intervention [1]; control groups the source abstract does not describe [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 136 trials in nonclinical settings, mindfulness programs improved anxiety (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.80 to -0.33), depression (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.34), distress (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.31) and well-being (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.54) against no intervention, 1 to 6 months after the program ended. Prediction intervals for all four crossed zero [1]. In 29 studies of mindfulness-based stress reduction in healthy adults, the between-group effect was g = 0.53 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.64), with large effects on stress and moderate effects on anxiety, depression and distress, maintained at an average 19 weeks of follow-up [2].
- Population
- 11,605 adults in 136 trials in 29 countries, 77% women, aged 18 to 73 [1]. 2,668 healthy adults in 29 studies [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- GRADE confidence was moderate to very low, mainly from inconsistency and high risk of bias. Only the effect on distress remained when higher-risk trials were excluded, and US trials reported smaller effects [1]. Heterogeneity was high [2]. Nobody can be blinded to a meditation course.
Symptoms of psychiatric disorders
Shown to ease disorder-specific symptoms more than no treatment and other active controls in pooled trials, and no differently from established treatments such as CBT or medication.
Compared with no treatment, minimal treatment, nonspecific and specific active controls, and evidence-based treatments [5]; waiting list, other active treatments, CBT and medication [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 142 samples, mindfulness programs were superior at the end of treatment to no treatment (d = 0.55), minimal treatment (d = 0.37), nonspecific active controls (d = 0.35) and specific active controls (d = 0.23), and did not differ from evidence-based treatments (d = -0.004). The most consistent evidence was for depression, pain conditions, smoking and addictive disorders [5]. Across 209 studies, effects were g = 0.53 against waiting list and g = 0.33 against other active treatments, with no difference from traditional CBT or behavioral therapies (g = -0.07) or medication (g = 0.13, 3 studies) [6].
- Population
- 12,005 participants with psychiatric disorders [5]. 12,145 participants in 209 studies [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- The two reviews overlap in the trials they pool. The equivalence with medication rests on 3 studies [6]. Effects shrink as the comparison becomes more active [5].
Depression and depressive relapse
Shown to ease depression symptoms modestly against active control programs, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy cut the risk of relapse within 60 weeks by about 31%.
Compared with active control programs [3]; no intervention and nonspecific active controls [1]; usual care and other active treatments including antidepressants [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against active controls, depression improved by an effect size of 0.30 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.59) at 8 weeks and 0.23 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.42) at 3 to 6 months [3]. In nonclinical settings, SMD -0.53 against no intervention and -0.46 against nonspecific active controls [1]. In individual patient data from 9 trials of people with recurrent depression in remission, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy lowered the risk of relapse within 60 weeks against no such therapy (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.82) and against active treatments including antidepressants (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97) [7].
- Population
- 3,515 participants in 47 trials [3]. Adults in nonclinical settings [1]. 1,258 patients with recurrent depression, mean age 47, 75% women [7].
- Sources
- [3], [1], [7]
- Caveats
- The lower confidence limit at 8 weeks sits at zero [3]. Relapse prevention was studied in people in full or partial remission, not in current depression, and the effect was larger in those with more residual symptoms [7].
Chronic pain
Shown to ease chronic pain slightly in pooled trials rated low in quality. In back pain, an 8-week course matched CBT and beat usual care.
Compared with treatment as usual, passive controls, and education or support groups [8]; active control programs [3]; usual care and cognitive behavioral therapy [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 30 trials, pain fell more with mindfulness meditation than with controls (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.54), smaller in trials rated fair or higher in quality (SMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.34, 19 trials) [8]. Against active controls, pain improved by an effect size of 0.33 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.62) [3]. In 342 adults with chronic low back pain, clinically meaningful improvement in function at 26 weeks reached 60.5% with mindfulness-based stress reduction, 57.7% with CBT and 44.1% with usual care (relative risk against usual care 1.37, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.77, and against CBT 0.95) [9].
- Population
- 3,536 adults with chronic pain from migraine, headache, back pain, osteoarthritis or nerve pain in 38 trials [8]. 342 adults aged 20 to 70 with chronic low back pain [9].
- Sources
- [8], [3], [9]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was substantial (I² 77.6%) and evidence for pain was rated low quality [8]. The back pain course included gentle yoga as well as meditation [9].
Depression in adults
Shown to reduce depression more than placebo in adults, with a higher response rate than SSRIs at two weeks and at the end of acute treatment.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of 522 trials, every antidepressant studied had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13, and in head-to-head trials mirtazapine was among seven drugs with higher response rates than other antidepressants (odds ratios 1.19 to 1.96) [1]. In a Cochrane review, mirtazapine had a higher response rate than SSRIs at two weeks (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.88) and at the end of acute treatment (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.39), and than venlafaxine (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.25). It did not differ from tricyclic antidepressants (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.10), and dropouts did not differ from other antidepressants [2].
- Population
- 116,477 adults in 522 trials [1]; 4,974 participants in 29 trials, most followed for six weeks [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The network meta-analysis rated certainty moderate to very low, and its abstract does not give the mirtazapine figure against placebo. Most trials lasted 6 to 12 weeks.
Daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy
Shown to reduce daytime sleepiness in adults with narcolepsy, about 3 points on the Epworth scale and 3 minutes longer awake on a lab test, but not cataplexy.
Compared with placebo [1][2][3]; sodium oxybate in one comparison [1]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Against placebo, modafinil lowered Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores by 2.73 points (95% CI 2.08 to 3.39) and lengthened time to fall asleep on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test by 2.82 minutes (95% CI 2.40 to 3.24). It did not change the number of cataplexy attacks a day. Its effect on sleepiness was similar to sodium oxybate's [1]. An updated meta-analysis found 3.56 more minutes on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (95% CI 2.25 to 4.86) and a 3.34-point drop on the Epworth scale (95% CI 2.56 to 4.13) [2]. In the two label trials, 58% to 72% on modafinil were rated improved against 37% to 38% on placebo [3].
- Population
- 1,054 patients in 9 randomized trials [1]; 997 adults in 5 trials pooled, out of 9 studies reviewed [2]; 558 adults in two 9-week US trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The 2026 review notes the randomized trials date mostly from the 1990s and early 2000s, with no new eligible trials in the past decade, and that long-term efficacy is not established [2]. Patients on modafinil still averaged well below normal wakefulness on the lab test [3].
Sleepiness in sleep apnea despite CPAP
Shown to reduce residual sleepiness in sleep apnea, about 2 to 3 points on the Epworth scale, with about three times the adverse events of placebo.
Compared with placebo, on top of CPAP [3][4][5]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Modafinil or armodafinil improved Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores by 2.2 points (95% CI 1.5 to 2.9) and Maintenance of Wakefulness Test times by 3 minutes (95% CI 2.1 to 3.8) over placebo. Adverse events tripled and withdrawals for adverse events doubled, with no rise in hospitalizations or deaths [4]. A second meta-analysis found Epworth scores lower by 2.96 points with modafinil (95% CI 2.19 to 3.73) and 2.63 with armodafinil (95% CI 1.85 to 3.40) [5]. In the 12-week label trial, 61% on modafinil 200 mg and 68% on 400 mg were rated improved against 37% on placebo [3].
- Population
- 1,466 patients in 10 trials of at least 2 weeks [4]; 723 patients in 11 modafinil trials and 1,009 in 5 armodafinil trials [5]; 327 adults with sleep apnea, 80% fully using CPAP [3].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The European Medicines Agency removed this indication in 2011 over an unfavorable balance of benefit and risk, which the first review sought to re-examine [4]. The drug treats sleepiness, not the airway obstruction [3].
Focus and memory in rested healthy adults
Shown to improve cognitive test scores in rested healthy adults by a very small amount, an effect size near 0.1, with no clear advantage in any one domain.
Compared with placebo [9][10][11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 19 placebo-controlled trials of a single dose, modafinil improved cognitive performance over placebo by g = 0.10 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.15). Domains did not differ, and 200 mg did no better than 100 mg [9]. A second meta-analysis found an overall effect of SMD 0.12, driven by memory updating (SMD 0.28), and its authors wrote that the belief among users that these drugs are strong cognitive enhancers is not supported [10]. A systematic review found most basic tests showed better executive function, half showed better attention and memory, and a few showed worse divergent creative thinking. It found no excess of side effects or mood changes [11].
- Population
- 19 trials and 67 effect sizes in adults who were not sleep deprived [9]; 14 modafinil studies with 64 effect sizes in healthy adults who were not sleep deprived [10]; primary studies in healthy adults from 1990 to 2014 [11].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Most trials tested one dose in a lab, not repeated use as people take it [10]. An effect size of 0.1 is about a tenth of a standard deviation on a test score. [9] included some psychiatric samples and found no difference from nonpsychiatric ones.
Memory and thinking after a nap
Shown to improve memory and overall test performance after an afternoon nap, a small to medium effect in three meta-analyses, similar across ages and nap lengths.
Compared with control conditions the abstract does not describe [1]; a no-nap control condition, and the same people before the nap [2]; a no-nap condition in randomized trials [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 60 samples, naps improved the aggregate of cognitive tests (Cohen's d 0.379, 95% CI 0.296 to 0.462), declarative memory (d 0.376), procedural memory (d 0.494) and speed of processing (d 0.211). Age, nap length, nap start time, habitual napping and prior sleep loss did not change the effect [1]. In working-age adults, overall cognitive performance improved after a nap (effect size 0.18, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.27), mainly up to 120 minutes after waking [2]. In young athletes and active men, a nap after a normal night improved cognitive performance (SMD 0.69, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.00) [3].
- Population
- 60 samples from 54 studies [1]. 381 participants in 11 studies, almost all in laboratories, mean nap 55.4 minutes [2]. 291 males aged 18 to 35 in 22 randomized trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Short laboratory studies of single naps. Heterogeneity was high in the athlete trials (I² 71.5%) [3]. Results in real workplaces are scarce [2].
Alertness and fatigue after a nap
Shown to raise vigilance and alertness and to reduce felt fatigue after a nap, in three meta-analyses of nap studies.
Compared with control conditions the abstract does not describe [1]; a no-nap control condition, and the same people before the nap [2]; a no-nap condition in randomized trials [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Naps improved vigilance (Cohen's d 0.610, 95% CI 0.291 to 0.929) [1]. Alertness improved after a nap (effect size 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.48), with better results for naps before 1 p.m. [2]. Perceived fatigue fell after a nap following a normal night (SMD -0.76, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.28), and benefits were also seen after partial sleep deprivation [3].
- Population
- 60 samples from 54 studies [1]. 381 working-age adults in 11 studies [2]. 291 young males in 22 randomized trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Most studies were in laboratories, short and small. Fatigue was self-rated, and heterogeneity was high (I² 89.5%) [3].
Depression and anxiety symptoms in trials
Shown to lower depression and anxiety symptoms by a medium amount in trials across many groups, including people with major depression, in reviews rated low in quality.
Compared with usual care [13]; active controls such as usual care or a placebo tablet [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 97 reviews, physical activity had medium effects on depression (median effect size -0.43), anxiety (-0.42) and psychological distress (-0.60, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.42), with larger effects at higher intensity [13]. In major depression, walking or jogging (g -0.62, 95% credible interval -0.80 to -0.45) and mixed aerobic exercise (g -0.43) reduced symptoms, with effects in proportion to the intensity prescribed [14].
- Population
- 128,119 participants in 1,039 trials within 97 reviews [13]. 14,170 people with major depression in 218 trials [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Most reviews were rated critically low in quality [13]. Only one depression trial was at low risk of bias, and participants could not be blinded [14].
Anxiety, compared with usual care or no intervention
Shown to lower anxiety around heart procedures and in other adults in pooled trials, mostly against usual care or no intervention, with large and varied effects.
Compared with control groups the source abstracts do not describe [8][9]; nonactive controls: sham intervention, usual care, waiting list or psychoeducation [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 10 trials of patients having cardiovascular procedures, reflexology lowered anxiety more than control [8]. In patients having coronary angiography, anxiety fell immediately after reflexology (Hedges' g -1.78, 95% CI -2.94 to -0.63) and 30 minutes later (g -1.16) [9]. Across adults with a range of conditions, anxiety fell (g -1.237, 95% CI -1.682 to -0.791) and depression fell (g -0.921, 95% CI -1.246 to -0.595) [10].
- Population
- 760 patients with a mean age of 59 in 10 trials [8]. 913 patients in 10 studies [9]. 2,366 adults in 26 trials [10].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Most control groups had no touch, so attention and touch are part of the effect. Two of the angiography studies were not randomized [9]. The sham-controlled results are in the blocks above.
Sleep quality
Shown to improve sleep quality scores in pooled trials, mostly against usual care or no intervention, with large effects.
Compared with control groups the source abstract does not describe [11]; nonactive controls: sham intervention, usual care, waiting list or psychoeducation [10]; control groups the source abstract does not describe [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 42 trials, sleep quality scores improved more than with controls (Hedges' g -1.37, 95% CI -1.81 to -0.94), and people given reflexology were less likely to still have sleep problems (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.31) [11]. A second meta-analysis found improved sleep quality (g -1.665, 95% CI -2.361 to -0.970), larger with longer and more total reflexology time [10]. An earlier review found a weighted effect of 1.19 for sleep [12].
- Population
- 3,928 adults in 42 trials [11]. 2,366 adults in 26 trials [10]. 18 studies on sleep [12].
- Sources
- [11], [10], [12]
- Caveats
- Trials were heterogeneous and mostly unblinded. The 42-trial review included studies in English and Chinese only [11].
Later school start times in teenagers
Shown to lengthen teenagers' sleep by about 25 to 77 minutes a night when school started later, in three reviews. Depressive symptoms fell slightly in pooled studies.
Compared with earlier school start times, as each study compared them [2]; the same students before the delay, and control schools in trials [3]; earlier school start times [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Six studies found later start times linked to more sleep. One study found fewer depressive symptoms, and results for alertness and absences were mixed. The evidence was rated very low in quality [2]. Start times delayed by 25 to 60 minutes were followed by 25 to 77 more minutes of sleep per weeknight, with some studies reporting less daytime sleepiness, depression and caffeine use [3]. Pooled, delayed start times added an average 69 minutes of sleep (SMD 0.63) and lowered depressive symptoms slightly (SMD -0.20) [4].
- Population
- 297,994 students aged 13 to 19 in 11 studies [2]. 6 studies, 2 of them randomized [3]. Middle and high school students in 6 studies [4].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Most studies were not randomized and were at high or unclear risk of bias [2]. Heterogeneity was high [4]. Whether the extra sleep lasts was not shown. One study reported less parent and child time [2].
Anxiety and depression symptoms
Shown to lower self-rated anxiety and depression symptoms in two meta-analyses, by small amounts for breathwork in general and larger amounts for heart rate variability biofeedback.
Compared with non-breathwork controls, active and inactive [2]; control conditions the source abstract does not describe [5]; inactive and active controls [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Breathwork lowered self-rated anxiety (g = -0.32, 20 trials, p < 0.0001) and depressive symptoms (g = -0.40, 18 trials, p < 0.0001) against non-breathwork controls, with moderate, significant heterogeneity [2]. Across 24 studies, heart rate variability biofeedback reduced self-reported stress and anxiety against control conditions by g = 0.83, an effect not changed by whether participants had an anxiety disorder [5]. A wider meta-analysis of the same technique found its largest effects for anxiety, depression and anger, from few studies each [3].
- Population
- Adults in 20 and 18 randomized trials [2]. 484 participants in 24 studies [5]. 58 randomized trials [3].
- Sources
- [2], [5], [3]
- Caveats
- Symptoms were self-rated and nobody can be blinded to breathing training. The biofeedback analysis pooled stress and anxiety together and included some studies without control groups in its within-group estimate [5].
Depression in adults
Shown to raise response in adult depression more than placebo. Head-to-head trials placed venlafaxine among the higher response rates and duloxetine level with other antidepressants.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 522 trials of 21 antidepressants, every drug had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13 and a summary standardized mean difference of 0.30 (95% CrI 0.26 to 0.34). In head-to-head trials, venlafaxine was among the drugs with higher response rates, and duloxetine and venlafaxine were among those with the most dropouts [1]. An earlier meta-analysis of 32 trials found venlafaxine ahead of other antidepressants by a standardized effect size of 0.14 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.22), with a similar margin over SSRIs [2]. Duloxetine did not differ from other antidepressants in a Cochrane review of 16 trials [3]. Desvenlafaxine at 50 to 400 mg a day lowered depression scores more than placebo in 8 trials [4]. For venlafaxine, response rose with dose up to about 75 to 150 mg, with a smaller rise above that [5].
- Population
- 116,477 adults in 522 trials [1]; 32 randomized trials of venlafaxine [2]; 5,735 participants in 16 trials of duloxetine against other antidepressants [3]; 8 RCTs of desvenlafaxine [4]; 19,364 participants in 77 dose-finding studies [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The headline figures in [1] cover all antidepressant classes, and its certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. The abstract of [4] gives no effect size. Most trials lasted weeks.
Generalized anxiety disorder
Shown to lower anxiety scores in generalized anxiety disorder, by about 3.1 Hamilton points more than placebo on duloxetine and 2.7 on venlafaxine.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis, duloxetine lowered Hamilton Anxiety scores more than placebo (MD -3.13, 95% CrI -4.13 to -2.13), as did venlafaxine (MD -2.69, 95% CrI -3.50 to -1.89) [6]. Across antidepressants, response was more likely than on placebo (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.55), a number needed to treat of 7 (95% CI 5 to 9), with similar findings when classes were compared separately. Dropouts for adverse effects were more frequent (RR 2.18), a number needed to harm of 17 [7]. Across anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and stress disorders, SSRIs and SNRIs lowered symptoms against placebo (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.51) [8].
- Population
- 25,441 adult outpatients in 89 trials [6]; 12,226 adults in 37 RCTs of 4 to 28 weeks [7]; 30,245 adults and children in 135 studies [8].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- [7] pooled SNRIs with other antidepressants. Desvenlafaxine has no generalized anxiety approval on its label [9].
Diabetic nerve pain
Shown to cut pain by half or more in painful diabetic neuropathy on duloxetine 60 mg, with about 5 treated for one extra person helped.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The evidence is for duloxetine. At 60 mg a day, a 50% or greater drop in pain at 12 weeks was more likely than on placebo (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.08), a number needed to treat of 5 (95% CI 4 to 7). Doses of 60 and 120 mg both reduced pain, and lower doses did not. 16% of participants stopped the drug for adverse effects [13]. Across neuropathic pain conditions, the combined number needed to treat for SNRIs was 6.4 (95% CI 5.2 to 8.4), with duloxetine making up 9 of 14 studies [14]. In a network meta-analysis of chronic pain, duloxetine was the highest-ranked antidepressant, and 60 mg did as well as higher doses on most outcomes [15].
- Population
- 2,728 participants with painful diabetic neuropathy in 8 studies [13]; 229 studies of drugs for neuropathic pain in adults [14]; 28,664 adults with chronic pain in 176 studies averaging 10 weeks [15].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- Almost every duloxetine study was run or sponsored by the manufacturer [13]. An analysis of publication bias suggested treatment effects in neuropathic pain were overstated by about 10% [14]. Most studies measured short-term outcomes only [15].
Dementia and thinking in later life
Linked to more dementia with low social participation and contact in two meta-analyses. Loneliness was linked in one and not significantly in the other.
Compared with people with more social participation and contact and less loneliness [5]; people with better social engagement [6]; people with more social activity and larger social networks [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Low social participation (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.75), less frequent social contact (RR 1.57) and more loneliness (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.09) were linked to new dementia. Low satisfaction with one's social network was not (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.62) [5]. A poor social network (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.96) and poor social support (RR 1.28) were linked to dementia, and loneliness was not significantly linked (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.94). Over 10 years or more, good social engagement went with 12% lower risk (RR 0.88) [6]. More social activity and larger networks were linked to better later-life thinking, a small association (r 0.054, 95% CI 0.043 to 0.065) [7].
- Population
- 19 cohort studies in the general population [5]. 2,370,452 participants in 31 cohort and 2 case-control studies [6]. 51 longitudinal studies [7].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Observational. Dementia changes behavior for years before diagnosis, so withdrawal from social life may be an early sign rather than a cause. Measures of social life varied widely between studies [7].
Programs to reduce loneliness
Shown to reduce loneliness modestly in pooled randomized trials. Programs addressing how people think about social situations had the largest effects, and added chances to socialize did not.
Compared with control groups in randomized comparison studies [11]; control groups [12]; control groups in randomized trials, some without active controls [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 20 randomized studies, interventions reduced loneliness by a small mean effect size of -0.198 (95% CI -0.32 to -0.08). Social cognitive training had the largest effect (-0.598), social support programs a smaller one (-0.162), and programs adding chances to socialize (-0.062, p = 0.67) or teaching social skills (0.017) showed none [11]. Psychological interventions, most often cognitive behavioral therapy, reduced loneliness against control groups (g 0.43) [12]. In older adults, most interventions had small effects, and the evidence was rated very low in quality [13].
- Population
- 50 interventions, 20 randomized [11]. 3,039 participants in 28 randomized trials across ages [12]. 4,592 adults aged 55 to 100 in 44 trials [13].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was considerable [12][13]. Pre-post and non-randomized studies gave larger effects than randomized ones [11]. These trials measured loneliness, not death, heart disease or dementia.
Depression in adults
Shown to reduce depression symptoms more than placebo in adults, by about 2 points on the Hamilton scale, with about 7 treated for one extra response.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 522 trials of 21 antidepressants, every drug had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13 and a summary standardized mean difference of 0.30 (95% CrI 0.26 to 0.34) [1]. In 131 placebo-controlled SSRI trials, SSRIs lowered Hamilton depression scores 1.94 points more than placebo (95% CI 1.37 to 2.50) and lowered the risk of no remission (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.91) [2]. In primary care trials, response was more likely on an SSRI than placebo (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.43), with a number needed to treat of 7 to 8 [3]. In individual data from trials submitted to FDA, the difference between drug and placebo was 1.75 Hamilton points (95% CI 1.63 to 1.86). A large response occurred in 24.5% on a drug and 9.6% on placebo, which the authors read as about 15% of participants having a substantial drug effect beyond placebo [4].
- Population
- 116,477 adults in 522 trials [1]; 27,422 adults in 131 trials [2]; 14 primary care studies, 4 of them testing SSRIs, mostly 6 to 8 weeks long [3]; 73,388 adults and children in 232 trials of antidepressant monotherapy [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- [1] and [4] cover all antidepressant classes, not SSRIs alone. [2] rated every trial at high risk of bias and set 3 Hamilton points as its threshold for clinical significance, which the pooled effect did not reach. The gap between drug and placebo widened with greater baseline severity [4]. Most trials lasted weeks.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
Shown to reduce OCD symptoms by about 3 points more than placebo on the Yale-Brown scale in adults, with response about 1.8 times as likely.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- SSRIs as a group lowered Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores more than placebo over 6 to 13 weeks (WMD -3.21, 95% CI -3.84 to -2.57) and raised clinical response (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.17). Results for individual SSRIs were similar [5]. A network meta-analysis found a class effect of -3.49 points against drug placebo (95% CrI -5.12 to -1.81). Behavioral therapy (-14.48) and cognitive therapy (-13.36) had larger effects against placebo than SSRIs did [6].
- Population
- 3,097 adults in 17 trials [5]; 6,652 adults in 54 trials, 37 of them of SSRIs with 3,158 patients [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Short-term trials. Most psychotherapy trials in [6] included people already taking stable doses of antidepressants, which limits the comparison between therapy and drugs.
Generalized anxiety disorder
Shown to raise response in generalized anxiety disorder, with about 7 treated for one extra response across antidepressants. Escitalopram lowered anxiety scores 2.45 points more than placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Antidepressants raised the rate of a 50% or greater drop on the Hamilton Anxiety scale against placebo (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.55), a number needed to treat of 7 (95% CI 5 to 9), with similar findings when classes were compared separately. Dropouts for adverse effects were more frequent on antidepressants (RR 2.18, 95% CI 1.81 to 2.61), a number needed to harm of 17 [7]. In a network meta-analysis, escitalopram lowered Hamilton Anxiety scores more than placebo (MD -2.45, 95% CrI -3.27 to -1.63). Sertraline and fluoxetine also beat placebo, in small samples. Paroxetine beat placebo and had more dropouts than placebo [8]. Across anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and stress disorders, SSRIs and SNRIs lowered symptoms against placebo (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.51) [9].
- Population
- 12,226 adults with moderate to severe generalized anxiety disorder in 37 RCTs of 4 to 28 weeks [7]; 25,441 adult outpatients in 89 trials [8]; 30,245 adults and children in 135 studies [9].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- [7] pooled SSRIs with other antidepressants and enrolled few people with other psychiatric conditions. The clearest single-drug estimate is for escitalopram [8]. Most trials in [9] had moderate risk of bias.
Compared with standard antidepressants
Shown to match standard antidepressants for response in adults with mild to moderate or major depression, with fewer dropouts than on SSRIs, over 4 to 12 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Response matched tricyclic and tetracyclic drugs (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.15, 5 trials) and SSRIs (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.11, 12 trials) [1]. A 2017 meta-analysis of 27 trials (3,808 patients) against SSRIs found similar response (RR 0.983) and remission (RR 1.013) and fewer dropouts (OR 0.587, 95% CI 0.478 to 0.697) [3].
- Population
- Adults with mild to moderate or major depression [1][3].
- Sources
- [1], [3]
- Caveats
- Trials ran 4 to 12 weeks, so long-term effects are not known. Benefit in severe depression or high suicide risk is unclear [3]. The 2017 search included Chinese databases [3].
Depression and anxiety symptoms
Shown to lower depressive symptoms by a moderate amount and anxiety by a small amount in pooled trials, with smaller effects in trials with blinded assessment.
Compared with nonactive control conditions [17][18]; active controls such as usual care or a placebo tablet [19]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Resistance training reduced depressive symptoms (effect size 0.66, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.83), a number needed to treat of 4, regardless of health status or training volume [17]. It reduced anxiety symptoms (effect size 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.44), more in healthy people (0.50) [18]. In major depression, strength training reduced symptoms (g -0.49, 95% credible interval -0.69 to -0.29) and was among the options people tolerated most [19].
- Population
- 1,877 participants in 33 trials [17]. 922 participants in 16 trials [18]. 643 people with major depression in 22 strength training arms [19].
- Sources
- [17], [18], [19]
- Caveats
- Trials with blinded allocation or assessment found smaller effects [17]. Confidence in the depression network results was rated very low for strength training [19].
Mood, anxiety and depressive feelings
Shown to ease negative mood, anxiety and depressive feelings and raise positive mood after time in nature, in several meta-analyses rating study quality mostly low.
Compared with control conditions, mostly passive [7]; control groups [8]; built environments [9]; before the forest bathing, in the same people [6]; a 90-minute walk in an urban setting [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 30 reviews, nature-based programs lowered anxiety (SMD -0.83, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.47), depressive symptoms (SMD -0.72) and negative affect (SMD -0.61), and raised positive affect (SMD 0.52). Physiological measures did not rise significantly (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.67) [7]. An umbrella review found lower tension (SMD -0.87) and negative affect (SMD -0.51) and higher positive affect (SMD 0.98) and wellbeing (SMD 0.40), at moderate credibility [8]. Short visits to natural settings had a small effect on depressive mood (mean g -0.29) [9]. After forest bathing, tension-anxiety and depression-dejection scores fell [6]. A 90-minute nature walk lowered rumination and activity in a brain region tied to it, and an urban walk did not [10].
- Population
- 3,870 primary studies in 30 reviews [7]. 344 studies in 28 reviews [8]. 33 studies [9]. 11 studies [6]. Healthy adults in one trial [10].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9], [6], [10]
- Caveats
- Most primary studies used passive controls, short follow-up and self-report, and were rated at high risk of bias [7][9]. Only 10 of 91 associations had moderate credibility [8]. Heterogeneity was large [9].
Migraine prevention in adults
Shown to cut migraine frequency by about 1.2 attacks a month against placebo in adults, with about 4 treated for one extra person whose attacks halved.
Compared with placebo [1][2][3]; amitriptyline and other preventive drugs, in network comparisons [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across nine trials, topiramate reduced headache frequency by 1.20 attacks per 28 days more than placebo (95% CI -1.59 to -0.80) and doubled the share of people whose attacks halved (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.60), a number needed to treat of 4 (95% CI 3 to 6). Effects were similar at 50, 100 and 200 mg [1]. A network meta-analysis found 1.1 fewer headaches a month than placebo (95% CI -1.9 to -0.73) and ranked amitriptyline above topiramate [2]. In the two label trials, monthly migraines fell by 2.1 on 100 mg against 0.8 and 1.1 on placebo, from about 5.5 at baseline [3].
- Population
- 1,737 adults in nine trials for frequency and 1,190 for responders [1]; randomized trials of adults with migraine [2]; 937 people aged 12 to 70 in two 26-week trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The network comparison with amitriptyline is indirect, and its abstract calls the evidence for amitriptyline's superiority weak [2].
Insomnia
Shown to improve self-rated sleep quality by a small to moderate amount in short trials of people with insomnia, with mixed results on measured sleep.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In seven placebo-controlled trials, people on trazodone rated their sleep quality higher (SMD -0.41, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.00) and woke less often (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.05). Sleep efficiency did not differ (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.38), nor did time to fall asleep or total sleep time [5]. A Cochrane review pooled three trazodone studies and found a similar gain in subjective sleep (SMD -0.34, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.02) and little or no difference in sleep efficiency on sleep-lab recordings (MD 1.38 percentage points, 95% CI -2.87 to 5.63) [6]. A meta-analysis of sleep-lab studies found longer total sleep time (39.88 minutes, 95% CI 14.44 to 65.32), a shorter time to persistent sleep (19.30 minutes) and fewer awakenings (SMD -0.67) [7]. A dose-response meta-analysis found improved subjective sleep quality (Cohen's d 0.67, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.98), with the benefit leveling off around 50 mg a day [8].
- Population
- 429 patients in 7 trials [5]; 370 participants in 3 pooled trazodone studies [6]; 466 participants with insomnia disorder in 11 RCTs [7]; 1,366 participants in 13 RCTs [8].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Not an approved use. Trials were small and short, and the Cochrane review rated the evidence low quality and found no evidence on long-term use [6]. Heterogeneity was high in the dose-response analysis (I² 81%) [8]. The analyses disagree on total sleep time [5][7].
Stopping a migraine attack
Shown to stop a migraine attack, with 28% pain free 2 hours after oral sumatriptan 50 mg against 11% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across Cochrane reviews of sumatriptan, the oral 50 mg dose left 28% pain free at 2 hours against 11% on placebo, a number needed to treat of 6.1 (95% CI 5.5 to 6.9) in 6,447 participants. For headache relief at 2 hours the number needed to treat was 3.5 (3.2 to 3.7) at oral 100 mg. Treating early, while pain was mild, gave better results than waiting [1][2]. In a meta-analysis of 53 trials, sumatriptan 100 mg gave a headache response at 2 hours in 59%, pain freedom at 2 hours in 29% and sustained pain freedom in 20% [3]. A network meta-analysis of 137 trials found every triptan superior to placebo for pain freedom at 2 hours, with odds ratios from 1.73 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.34) for naratriptan to 5.19 (4.25 to 6.33) for eletriptan [4].
- Population
- 52,236 participants across Cochrane reviews of sumatriptan by all routes [1]; 37,250 participants in 61 studies of oral sumatriptan [2]; 24,089 patients in 53 trials of oral triptans [3]; 89,445 participants in 137 trials of 17 drugs [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Trials treat a single attack or a few. Twelve of the 53 trials in the earlier meta-analysis were unpublished [3].
Differences between triptans
Shown to differ within the class, with eletriptan and rizatriptan ranking above sumatriptan for pain freedom at 2 hours and naratriptan lowest.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In head-to-head comparisons within a network of 137 trials, eletriptan had the highest odds of pain freedom at 2 hours, followed by rizatriptan, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan, and naratriptan had the lowest odds against placebo (OR 1.73) [4]. Against sumatriptan 100 mg, an earlier meta-analysis found better pain relief with rizatriptan 10 mg, better pain relief and lower tolerability with eletriptan 80 mg, and lower pain relief with better tolerability for naratriptan 2.5 mg [3]. A third network analysis found the most favorable results for injected sumatriptan, orally dissolving rizatriptan and zolmitriptan, and eletriptan tablets [6].
- Population
- 89,445 participants in 137 trials [4]; 24,089 patients in 53 trials, 22 of them comparing triptans directly [3]; 133 randomized trials [6].
- Sources
- [4], [3], [6]
- Caveats
- Many rankings rest on indirect comparison through placebo. Confidence in the network estimates ranged from high to very low [4].
Purpose in life and depression
Linked to fewer depressive and anxiety symptoms in people with a stronger sense of purpose in life, in two meta-analyses, moderate correlations.
Compared with people with a lower sense of purpose in life [13][14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Purpose in life correlated with lower depression (r -0.49, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.45) and lower anxiety (r -0.36) [13]. In 71 of 72 samples, purpose was linked to fewer depressive symptoms (estimate -0.32, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.30), and each standard deviation more purpose to lower odds of severe distress (OR 0.53) [14].
- Population
- 66,468 people in 99 samples [13]. 531,038 participants in 72 samples across six world regions [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Mostly measured at one time, so depression lowering purpose is as likely as the reverse. The two concepts overlap in how they are asked about.
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, against no treatment
Shown to cut stroke by about 64% against placebo or no treatment in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, with fewer deaths in one review.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across six trials, adjusted-dose warfarin lowered stroke by 64% (95% CI 49 to 74) against control [1]. In five trials of people with no earlier stroke, warfarin lowered all stroke (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.59), disabling or fatal stroke (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.80) and death (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.94) over a mean 1.5 years. The reviewers estimated about 25 strokes prevented each year for every 1,000 people treated [2].
- Population
- 2,900 participants in six trials, within a meta-analysis of 29 trials and 28,044 participants, mean age 71 [1]; 2,313 participants without earlier stroke in five trials, mean age 69 [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The band above is the estimate of 25 strokes prevented a year per 1,000 treated. Follow-up was short, and bleeding estimates from these trials were imprecise [2].
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, against aspirin
Shown to cut stroke by about 39% more than antiplatelet drugs in atrial fibrillation, and to halve stroke against aspirin in adults aged 75 or over.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 12 trials, adjusted-dose warfarin lowered stroke by 39% (95% CI 22 to 52) against antiplatelet therapy [1]. In people aged 75 or over, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage or systemic embolism occurred at 1.8% a year on warfarin against 3.8% on aspirin (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.80). Extracranial hemorrhage occurred at 1.4% a year against 1.6% [3].
- Population
- 12,963 participants in 12 trials [1]; 973 patients aged 75 or over, mean age 81.5, followed a mean 2.7 years [3].
- Sources
- [1], [3]
- Caveats
- Trial quality varied and was often incompletely reported [1].
Depression symptoms
Shown to ease depression symptoms by a small to moderate amount, against waiting list, usual care and attention controls, and against active exercise comparisons in older adults.
Compared with waiting list, treatment as usual and attention control [6]; inactive controls such as a waiting list or education booklets [7]; active controls such as walking or chair aerobics [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people with a diagnosed mental disorder, physically active yoga lowered depressive symptoms more than waiting list, usual care and attention control (standardized mean difference 0.41, p < 0.001, 13 trials), with larger reductions at more sessions a week [6]. In older adults without a specific condition, depression improved against inactive controls (effect size 0.64) and against active controls (effect size 0.54) [7].
- Population
- 632 adults with depression, post-traumatic stress, schizophrenia, anxiety, alcohol dependence or bipolar disorder in 13 trials [6]. Older adults with a mean age of 60 or above in 22 trials [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Trials were small, and nobody can be blinded to yoga.
Falling asleep faster
Shown to shorten the time to fall asleep by about 22 minutes on sleep-lab recordings in adults with insomnia, an effect the authors called small.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 13 placebo-controlled trials submitted to FDA, eszopiclone, zaleplon and zolpidem together shortened sleep latency on polysomnography by 22 minutes (95% CI 11 to 33), with the 95% CI of the standardized mean difference running from -0.57 to -0.16. Self-rated sleep latency improved less (SMD -0.33, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.04). Latency fell more with larger doses, longer treatment, younger or female participants, and zolpidem [1]. A meta-analysis of 6 trials found one month of zolpidem reduced sleep latency against placebo [2]. In adults aged 60 and older, zaleplon reduced measured sleep onset latency by 21.63 minutes and self-rated latency by 15.86 minutes against control [3]. Across 75 sleep laboratory studies, zolpidem showed significant initial efficacy, with marginal tolerance over intermediate and long-term use [4].
- Population
- 4,378 participants in 13 trials [1]; 1,068 patients with insomnia disorder in 6 trials [2]; 5,917 older adults in 24 articles [3]; 1,276 people in 75 studies, 804 of them with insomnia [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The authors of [1] described the drug effect as small and of questionable clinical importance, and noted that the placebo response accounted for much of the total improvement. The abstract of [2] gives no effect sizes. Most trials lasted days to weeks.
Depression
Shown to improve depression scores over placebo in two small trials of adults with depression, though the review authors judged the evidence too weak to be conclusive.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review located 108 trials of 5-HTP and tryptophan, and only 2 (64 patients) met quality criteria. Combined, they favored the supplements over placebo (Peto OR 4.10, 95% CI 1.28 to 13.15, NNT 2.78), and the authors judged the evidence too weak to be conclusive [1]. A 2020 meta-analysis of 13 studies reported a remission rate of 0.65 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.78) and a large effect on questionnaire scores (Hedges' g 1.11, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.69, I² 76%) [2]. In 60 patients with a first depressive episode, 8 weeks of 5-HTP or fluoxetine gave similar HAM-D reductions, with 73.33% and 80% responding [3]. In a 25-person crossover trial in Parkinson's disease, 50 mg a day improved HDRS depression scores over placebo but not apathy [4].
- Population
- Adults with unipolar depression or dysthymia [1][2]. First-episode depression in India [3]. Parkinson's disease [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The 2020 review rated studies as relatively weak, and few had placebo groups [2]. The fluoxetine comparison had no placebo arm [3].
Tension-type headache
Shown to leave slightly more adults pain free 2 hours after 1,000 mg for a tension-type headache, with 22 treated for one extra person pain free.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- For being pain free at 2 hours, the number needed to treat with paracetamol 1,000 mg against placebo was 22 (95% CI 15 to 40) in 8 studies with 5,890 participants, with no difference from placebo at 1 hour. For being pain free or in mild pain at 2 hours it was 10 (95% CI 7.9 to 14). Rescue medication use was lower than on placebo. On limited data, 500 to 650 mg was not superior to placebo, and 1,000 mg did not differ from ketoprofen 25 mg or ibuprofen 400 mg. Adverse events did not differ from placebo (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.3) [4]. An overview of systematic reviews rated this evidence moderate quality (pain free at 2 hours RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4) [5].
- Population
- 8,079 adults with frequent episodic tension-type headache and moderate or severe pain at the start, in 23 studies [4]; 36 systematic reviews covering 44 painful conditions [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The overview draws on the same Cochrane review. Comparisons with ketoprofen and ibuprofen were rated low quality [4].
Acute migraine
Shown to leave 19% of adults pain free 2 hours after 1,000 mg for a migraine, against 10% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Taken for moderate to severe migraine pain, paracetamol 1,000 mg left 19% pain free at 2 hours against 10% on placebo (number needed to treat 12). Headache relief at 2 hours was 56% against 36% (5.0) and at 1 hour 39% against 20% (5.2). Paracetamol 1,000 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg did not differ significantly from oral sumatriptan 100 mg for headache relief at 2 hours [6]. In 3 trials of the over-the-counter combination of acetaminophen, aspirin and caffeine, pain fell to mild or none at 2 hours in 59.3% of 602 treated patients and 32.8% of 618 on placebo, and 50.8% against 23.5% were pain free at 6 hours [7].
- Population
- 2,942 participants and 5,109 attacks in 11 studies [6]; 1,220 people with migraine in 3 trials [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- The combination trials tested acetaminophen with aspirin and caffeine, not acetaminophen alone [7]. The review authors noted the number needed to treat of 12 is higher than for other commonly used pain relievers [6].
Migraine prevention
Shown to halve migraine frequency in 41% against 17% with no acupuncture. Against sham acupuncture the difference was small, 50% against 41%.
Compared with no acupuncture or routine care [6]; sham acupuncture [6]; preventive migraine drugs [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After treatment, headache frequency at least halved in 41% with acupuncture and 17% with no acupuncture (RR 2.40, 95% CI 2.08 to 2.76, 4 trials, 2,519 participants, number needed to treat 4). Against sham, it halved in 50% and 41% (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.36, 14 trials, 1,825 participants, number needed to treat 11), and frequency fell slightly more (SMD -0.18). Against preventive drugs, frequency at least halved in 57% and 46% at 3 months (RR 1.24) and in 59% and 54% at 6 months, a difference that was no longer significant [6].
- Population
- 22 trials with 4,985 adults with episodic migraine, lasting at least 8 weeks [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Evidence was rated moderate. The no-acupuncture and drug comparisons could not be blinded. Only one trial followed people past treatment against no acupuncture [6].
Tension-type headache
Shown to halve headache frequency more often than routine care, 48% against 19% in the largest trial. Against sham acupuncture the difference was smaller, 51% against 43%.
Compared with routine care or treatment of acute headaches only [7]; sham acupuncture [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In the largest trial against routine care, headache frequency at least halved in 302 of 629 (48%) with acupuncture and 121 of 636 (19%) without (RR 2.5, 95% CI 2.1 to 3.0). Against sham, it halved in 205 of 391 (51%) and 133 of 312 (43%) (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.5, 4 trials). One of 420 people receiving acupuncture dropped out for adverse effects [7].
- Population
- 12 trials with 2,349 adults with episodic or chronic tension-type headache [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Evidence was rated moderate. The two trials against routine care were unblinded and differed in baseline headache frequency. Effects beyond 4 months were not studied against routine care [7].
Amphetamines compared with methylphenidate
Shown to reduce clinician-rated ADHD symptoms more with amphetamines than with methylphenidate in head-to-head comparisons, in children and in adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In head-to-head comparisons, amphetamines reduced clinician-rated symptoms more than modafinil, atomoxetine and methylphenidate, with SMDs from -0.46 to -0.24 in children and adolescents and from -0.94 to -0.29 in adults. Amphetamines were less well tolerated than placebo in children (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.89) and adults (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.54 to 6.92), and methylphenidate less well tolerated than placebo in adults only (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.40 to 4.08). Weighing both, the authors' data favored methylphenidate in children and amphetamines in adults [1].
- Population
- 133 double-blind trials, 81 in children and adolescents and 51 in adults [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The SMD ranges cover three comparator drugs, and the abstract does not give the figure for methylphenidate alone. Confidence was low or very low for most indirect comparisons.
School work in children with ADHD
Shown to raise math output by 7.8% and math accuracy by 3.0% on methylphenidate in children with ADHD, gains the authors called small.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 34 studies, methylphenidate increased math productivity by 7.8%, math accuracy by 3.0% and reading speed (SMD 0.47), but not reading accuracy. Academic gains were small compared with symptom gains [6].
- Population
- Children with ADHD in 34 studies of methylphenidate [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for methylphenidate. The studies measured classroom tasks over short periods, not grades or long-term attainment.
Binge eating disorder
Shown to cut binge eating by about 1.4 to 1.7 more days a week than placebo on lisdexamfetamine in adults with moderate to severe binge eating disorder.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In two 12-week trials, lisdexamfetamine 50 or 70 mg a day reduced binge eating days per week more than placebo, by 1.35 days (95% CI 1.01 to 1.70) and 1.66 days (95% CI 1.28 to 2.04) [7]. In an earlier 11-week trial, four weeks free of binge eating was reached by 50.0% on 70 mg, 42.2% on 50 mg and 21.3% on placebo, and 30 mg did not differ from placebo [8]. Among people who had responded to open-label treatment, relapse over 6 months occurred in 3.7% who stayed on lisdexamfetamine and 32.1% switched to placebo (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.23) [9].
- Population
- 383 and 390 adults in two 12-week trials [7]; adults in an 11-week dose-ranging trial [8]; 275 responders randomized after open-label treatment, 87% women [9].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for lisdexamfetamine, the only stimulant approved for this use, and comes from manufacturer-run trials of 11 to 12 weeks plus one withdrawal trial. The withdrawal trial enrolled only people who had already responded.
Diabetic nerve damage, IV treatment
Shown to raise nerve conduction speed in people with diabetic neuropathy when given by IV for 2 to 4 weeks. Most trials were poor quality.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- IV alpha-lipoic acid at 300 to 600 mg a day for 2 to 4 weeks raised nerve conduction velocity by 3.2 to 4.6 m/s across four nerves, and overall improvement was 4 times as likely as on control (OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.73 to 5.94) [1].
- Population
- 15 randomized trials in diabetic peripheral neuropathy [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The authors note most trials were of poor quality [1].
Diabetic nerve symptoms, oral treatment
Shown to lower nerve symptom scores in people with diabetic neuropathy over 5 weeks. Over 4 years, the main combined measure did not change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 5 weeks, total symptom scores fell 51% on 600 mg a day, 48% on 1,200 mg and 52% on 1,800 mg, against 32% on placebo (all P < 0.05) [2]. Over 4 years, 600 mg a day did not change the primary composite of impairment and nerve tests (P = 0.105). Impairment scores improved on secondary measures (NIS, P = 0.028) [3]. A 2026 network meta-analysis ranked oral alpha-lipoic acid first for lower-limb impairment scores (NIS-LL, SUCRA 97.4%, I² 0%). IV ranked first for symptom scores, and both routes raised global satisfaction [4]. A 2026 meta-analysis found lower paresthesia (SMD -1.04, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.84) and numbness (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.01) scores, mostly at 600 mg a day. HbA1c and two nerve conduction measures did not change [5].
- Population
- 181 people with diabetic polyneuropathy in Russia and Israel [2]; 460 people with mild to moderate diabetic polyneuropathy [3]; 9 randomized trials of 600 to 1,800 mg a day for 3 to 208 weeks [4]; 15 studies in diabetic neuropathy [5].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- In the 4-year trial, the placebo group did not worsen, so the trial could not test prevention of decline as designed [3]. The abstract of [5] does not separate oral from IV use, and some comparisons were against other treatments.
Fibromyalgia
Shown in very low quality evidence to make at least 50% pain relief about three times as likely as placebo, with about 4 treated for one extra responder.
Compared with placebo and other active treatments [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Using third-tier evidence, at least 50% pain relief was more likely on amitriptyline than placebo (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.9), a number needed to treat of 4.1. Fatigue, sleep, quality of life and tender points showed no consistent differences. At least one adverse event occurred in 78% on amitriptyline and 47% on placebo [6].
- Population
- 649 adults in nine studies of 6 to 24 weeks at 25 to 50 mg a day [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- No study had 50 or more participants per arm, and the review found no first or second tier evidence [6].
Migraine prevention in adults
Shown to reduce migraine frequency against placebo in adults in a network meta-analysis, which ranked it above several other preventive drugs on weak evidence.
Compared with placebo [7]; candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, topiramate and valproate, in network comparisons [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Amitriptyline reduced episodic migraine against placebo (SMD -1.2, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.82). The network analysis found it better than candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, topiramate and valproate, and no different from atenolol, flunarizine, clomipramine or metoprolol [7].
- Population
- Adults with migraine in randomized trials, including 11 tricyclic antidepressant trials against placebo [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The authors describe the evidence for amitriptyline's superiority over other drugs as weak [7].
Tension-type headache
Shown to cut chronic tension-type headaches by about 4.8 a month against placebo with tricyclic antidepressants, which also reduced headaches more than SSRIs.
Compared with placebo, SSRIs and behavioral therapy [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Tricyclic antidepressants reduced headache frequency against placebo (WMD -4.8 headaches a month, 95% CI -6.63 to -2.95) and painkiller use (WMD -21.0 doses a month). They reduced headaches more than SSRIs and were similar to behavioral therapy in a few trials [9].
- Population
- Adults in 22 randomized trials, 8 comparing a tricyclic with placebo [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- The pooled result is for tricyclics as a group, and the abstract does not separate amitriptyline [9].
Nortriptyline for quitting smoking
Shown to about double quit rates against placebo with nortriptyline in a Cochrane review of six trials.
Compared with placebo [14]; bupropion [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Nortriptyline raised smoking cessation against placebo (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.78, I² 16%). Against bupropion, quit rates did not clearly differ (RR 1.30 favoring bupropion, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.82) [14].
- Population
- 975 smokers in six nortriptyline trials, within a review of 124 studies [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for nortriptyline, not amitriptyline. Nortriptyline is not approved for quitting smoking.
Clopidogrel compared with aspirin
Shown to lower stroke, heart attack or vascular death slightly more than aspirin, 5.32% against 5.83% a year, in people with artery disease.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people with a recent stroke, recent heart attack or peripheral artery disease, the yearly risk of ischemic stroke, heart attack or vascular death was 5.32% on clopidogrel against 5.83% on aspirin, a relative reduction of 8.7% (95% CI 0.3 to 16.5) [3]. A collaborative meta-analysis put the reduction in serious vascular events with clopidogrel against aspirin at 10% [1].
- Population
- 19,185 patients followed a mean 1.91 years [3].
- Sources
- [3], [1]
- Caveats
- One large trial, with a confidence interval that nearly reached no difference [3].
Clopidogrel with aspirin after a minor stroke or TIA
Shown to cut stroke in the next 90 days to 8.2% against 11.7% on aspirin alone after a minor stroke or TIA in one of two trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Started within 24 hours of a minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack, clopidogrel plus aspirin lowered stroke at 90 days to 8.2% against 11.7% on aspirin alone (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.81), with moderate or severe hemorrhage in 0.3% of each group [8]. In a second trial, major ischemic events occurred in 5.0% against 6.5% (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.95), and major hemorrhage in 0.9% against 0.4% (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.87) [9].
- Population
- 5,170 patients in China [8]; 4,881 patients at 269 international sites [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Both trials tested a short course begun within a day of the event. The second was stopped early for both benefit and bleeding [9].
Aspirin in the first weeks after a stroke or TIA
Shown to cut repeat ischemic stroke in the first 6 weeks by about 60%, with no further benefit seen after 12 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 12 trials, aspirin lowered the 6-week risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (84 of 8,452 against 175 of 7,326, HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.55) and of disabling or fatal ischemic stroke (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.42). The effects did not depend on dose. After 12 weeks, stroke risk did not differ from control (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.12) [10].
- Population
- 15,778 participants in 12 trials of aspirin against control [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- A pooled time-course analysis of older trials.
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
Shown to cut stroke by about 22% against no treatment in atrial fibrillation, less than warfarin or apixaban did in direct comparisons.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across eight trials, antiplatelet agents lowered stroke by 22% (95% CI 6 to 35) against control in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Adjusted-dose warfarin lowered stroke 39% more than antiplatelet therapy (95% CI 22 to 52) [17]. In a trial of people unsuited to warfarin, stroke or systemic embolism occurred at 3.7% a year on aspirin against 1.6% on apixaban (HR 0.45 for apixaban, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.62), with major bleeding at 1.2% against 1.4% a year [18].
- Population
- 4,876 participants in eight antiplatelet trials and 12,963 in 12 trials against warfarin [17]; 5,599 patients [18].
- Sources
- [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Neither drug's label read here lists atrial fibrillation as an approved use.
Depression symptoms
Shown to lower depression scores in people with mental disorders, mostly anxiety disorders, though a second statistical model did not confirm the effect.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people with mental disorders, depression symptoms fell (SMD -1.28, 95% CI -2.40 to -0.16) [2]. A 2026 analysis of 22 trials reported lower depression scores (SMD -5.68, 95% CI -8.43 to -2.94) [3].
- Population
- People with mental disorders, mostly anxiety disorders [2]. Adults in 22 RCTs [3].
- Sources
- [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The Bayesian model in [2] confirmed the anxiety effect but not the depression effect.
Seizures in drug-resistant epilepsy (modified Atkins)
Shown to make a 50% seizure reduction about six times as likely as drug therapy alone in drug-resistant epilepsy, though less often than the classic ketogenic diet in children.
Compared with a usual diet with the same antiseizure drugs [1]; standard care with no diet therapy [2]; usual care [3]; standard drug therapy alone [4]; the classic ketogenic diet and a low glycemic index diet [5]; the classic ketogenic diet [6]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 6 RCTs (575 patients), the modified Atkins diet added to drug therapy made a 50% or greater seizure reduction more likely than drug therapy alone (RR 6.28, 95% CI 3.52 to 10.50), in children (RR 6.28) and adults (RR 6.14, 95% CI 1.15 to 32.66), and made seizure freedom more likely (RR 5.94, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.31) [1]. In adolescents and adults, 23% on the diet had a 50% reduction (95% CI 10% to 37%), RR 6.47 (95% CI 1.60 to 26.14) [2]. A Cochrane review rated the adult evidence very uncertain (RR 5.03, 95% CI 0.26 to 97.68, 2 studies), and found up to 25% of children seizure free and up to 60% with a 50% reduction [3]. In 160 adolescents and adults over 6 months, 26.2% had a 50% reduction against 2.5% on drugs alone [4]. In children, median seizure frequency fell 45% on the modified Atkins diet and 66% on the classic ketogenic diet, and the modified Atkins diet did not meet the trial's noninferiority margin [5]. A 2026 meta-analysis found the classic diet more likely to halve seizures (OR 0.55 for the modified Atkins diet, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.87), with no difference in seizure freedom [6].
- Population
- Children and adults with drug-resistant epilepsy on antiseizure medication [1][2][3][4]; 170 children aged 1 to 15 in India [5]; children in 8 studies, experimental and observational [6].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Average follow-up was 12 weeks [1]. Only 3 RCTs were in the adolescent and adult review [2], and its lead author also led trial [4]. Cochrane certainty was very low [3]. This is a medically supervised version used for epilepsy, not the weight-loss program.
Schizophrenia, preventing relapse
Shown to cut relapse within a year to 27% on an antipsychotic against 64% on placebo in people with schizophrenia, about 1 fewer relapse per 3 treated.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 65 trials, relapse at one year occurred in 27% on antipsychotic drugs and 64% on placebo (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.49, number needed to treat 3). Readmission occurred in 10% against 26% (number needed to treat 5). More people on the drugs gained weight (10% against 6%), had movement disorders (16% against 9%) and had sedation (13% against 9%) [4].
- Population
- 6,493 patients in 65 trials [4].
- Sources
- [4], [3]
- Caveats
- A class result covering first- and second-generation drugs, with substantial heterogeneity in effect size. The quetiapine label states that its maintenance use in schizophrenia has not been systematically evaluated in controlled trials [3].
Bipolar mania
Shown to reduce mania symptoms more than placebo for both quetiapine and aripiprazole, by a standardized mean difference of 0.37, and less than haloperidol.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of drugs for acute mania, quetiapine (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.23) and aripiprazole (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.23) each reduced mania symptoms more than placebo. Haloperidol (SMD -0.56) reduced symptoms more than either. Quetiapine led to fewer discontinuations than placebo or lithium [5].
- Population
- Randomized trials of antimanic drugs in adults with acute mania [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- One network meta-analysis of short trials. The abstract read here does not give the number of trials or participants.
Bipolar depression
Shown to reduce depressive symptoms in bipolar depression more than placebo on quetiapine 150 or 300 mg a day, without a clear gain in response or remission rates.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of 103 trials, extended-release quetiapine 150 and 300 mg a day was among the treatments that outperformed placebo for depressive symptoms once the analysis was limited to low-risk-of-bias studies. No treatment outperformed placebo for response, remission, acceptability or tolerability [6]. Quetiapine is approved for depressive episodes of bipolar disorder on the basis of 8-week trials [3].
- Population
- 20,941 participants in 103 trials of 71 treatment combinations [6]; 698 people on quetiapine and 347 on placebo in the 8-week label trials [3].
- Sources
- [6], [3]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for quetiapine. Aripiprazole is not approved for bipolar depression. The abstract gives a range of estimates across drugs and no figure for quetiapine alone.
Sleep, low-dose quetiapine
Shown to improve sleep quality and add about 48 minutes of sleep against placebo, mostly in people with anxiety or depression, with frequent side effects.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 21 trials, quetiapine improved sleep quality against placebo (SMD -0.57, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.40), with significant effects in the generalized anxiety, major depression and healthy subgroups and at 50, 150 and 300 mg. Total sleep time rose by 47.91 minutes against placebo (95% CI 28.06 to 67.76) and did not differ from other psychiatric drugs (-4.19 minutes, 95% CI -19.43 to 11.05). Adverse events and discontinuation because of them were common [13].
- Population
- 21 clinical trials, mainly in people with generalized anxiety disorder or major depressive disorder and in healthy volunteers [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Not an approved use. Most trials measured sleep as a secondary outcome in people treated for another condition, and results in older people were highly heterogeneous. See the block on low-dose quetiapine and cardiovascular events below.
Agitation and psychosis in dementia
Shown to produce small improvements in behavioral symptoms of dementia on aripiprazole, with effect sizes of 0.12 to 0.20, against a higher death rate than placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among 14 placebo-controlled trials in older people with dementia, small but statistically significant effect sizes of 0.12 to 0.20 on global behavioral symptom scores were seen for aripiprazole, olanzapine and risperidone. In older people, adverse events included an increased risk of death, with one extra death per 87 treated [12].
- Population
- Older people with dementia in 14 placebo-controlled trials [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Not an approved use, and both labels carry a boxed warning about it. The review's summary names aripiprazole, olanzapine and risperidone as showing benefit, not quetiapine.
Irritability in autism
Shown to lower irritability scores by about 6 points more than placebo on aripiprazole in children and adolescents with autism over 8 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In two 8-week trials, aripiprazole improved the irritability subscale of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist by 6.17 points more than placebo (95% CI 3.26 to 9.07), hyperactivity by 7.93 points and stereotypy by 2.66 points. Weight rose by a mean of 1.13 kg more than placebo (95% CI 0.71 to 1.54) [14].
- Population
- 308 children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder in two trials [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for aripiprazole, rated moderate quality, in children and adolescents only.
Stress and mood
Shown to improve stress slightly in healthy and at-risk adults over 4 weeks or more, with no change in depression or anxiety. Bayer funded the review.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across trials of 3 or more B vitamins for 4 weeks or longer, stress improved slightly (SMD 0.23, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.45). Depressive symptoms did not significantly change (SMD 0.15, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.32), nor did anxiety (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.20) [5].
- Population
- 16 trials with 2,015 participants, healthy and at-risk, 12 pooled [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- Funded by Bayer HealthCare, which sells B-complex products [5].
Alcohol withdrawal
Shown to cut seizures during alcohol withdrawal, with a risk ratio of 0.16 against placebo in three studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against placebo, benzodiazepines lowered the risk of withdrawal seizures (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.69), with no significant difference on the other outcomes examined. No one benzodiazepine differed significantly from another [15].
- Population
- 324 participants in 3 placebo-controlled studies, within a Cochrane review of 64 studies and 4,309 participants [15].
- Sources
- [15], [8]
- Caveats
- A supervised medical setting. Among the four drugs here, the label for diazepam lists acute alcohol withdrawal as a use [8].
Stopping a prolonged seizure
Shown to stop prolonged seizures more often than placebo when given by vein in hospital, with lorazepam ahead of diazepam.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In status epilepticus, intravenous diazepam lowered the risk of seizures not stopping against placebo (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.92), as did intravenous lorazepam (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.71). Lorazepam did better than diazepam (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.90) [16].
- Population
- 2,755 participants in 18 studies of status epilepticus [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- Emergency treatment by injection, not the tablets most people are prescribed. Few studies used the same comparison [16].
Migraine prevention
Shown to lower episodic migraine by about 1.5 headaches a month on propranolol against placebo, with 40% against 23% halving their migraine days in one trial.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across placebo-controlled trials, propranolol lowered episodic migraine by 1.5 headaches a month at 8 weeks (95% CI -2.3 to -0.65) and made a 50% reduction more likely (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7). For chronic migraine the estimate was RR 2.0 (95% CI 1.0 to 4.3) [15]. In a crossover trial, migraine days per 4 weeks were 2.91 on slow-release propranolol 160 mg and 3.53 on placebo, and 40% against 23% had at least a 50% reduction [16].
- Population
- 108 randomized trials of beta-blockers for headache prevention, 50 placebo-controlled [15]; 72 adults with episodic or chronic migraine [16].
- Sources
- [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Most of the evidence is for propranolol. Trials comparing beta-blockers with other preventive drugs were mostly single and underpowered [15].
Essential tremor
Shown to reduce limb tremor in essential tremor on propranolol, rated Level A in one evidence review and clinically useful in another.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The American Academy of Neurology evidence review kept propranolol at Level A, its highest rating, for limb tremor in essential tremor [20]. A Movement Disorder Society review of 64 studies classed propranolol as clinically useful for limb tremor and found insufficient evidence for voice and head tremor [21]. In a crossover trial, propranolol 40 mg three times a day reduced tremor on all measures at day 15, and placebo produced no significant change on accelerometry [22]. The propranolol tablet label lists essential tremor as an approved use and describes a 2-week placebo-controlled study in 9 people [23].
- Population
- Clinical trials in essential tremor reviewed by two specialist societies [20][21]; 16 people with essential tremor [22].
- Sources
- [20], [21], [22], [23]
- Caveats
- The abstracts give no pooled effect size. The evidence is for propranolol.
Migraine in children, compared with a waiting list
Shown to cut migraine attacks by about 2 a month against a waiting list in children and adolescents, in five small trials.
Compared with waiting list [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Biofeedback reduced migraine frequency (mean difference -1.97, 95% CI -2.72 to -1.21), attack duration (-3.94) and headache intensity (-1.77) compared with a waiting list [4].
- Population
- 137 children and adolescents in 5 trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Only 40% of risk-of-bias judgments were low, and reporting was often incomplete [4].
Tension-type headache
Shown to reduce tension-type headache with a medium to large effect (d 0.73) that lasted about 15 months, more than headache monitoring, placebo or relaxation.
Compared with headache monitoring, placebo, and relaxation therapies [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 53 studies, biofeedback gave an effect size of 0.73 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.84) that held over an average 15 months of follow-up. Headache frequency improved most, with gains in muscle tension, anxiety, depression and pain medication use. Biofeedback combined with relaxation gave the largest effects, and effects were especially large in children and adolescents [5].
- Population
- 53 studies of tension-type headache [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis from one research group. The abstract does not say how many studies were randomized [5].
Anxiety and stress, heart rate variability biofeedback
Shown to reduce self-reported stress and anxiety with a large effect (Hedges' g 0.83) against control conditions, in a meta-analysis of 24 studies.
Compared with control conditions the source abstract does not describe [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Heart rate variability biofeedback reduced stress and anxiety within groups (g 0.81) and against control conditions (g 0.83). The effect did not depend on study year, risk of bias, share of women, number of sessions or whether people had an anxiety disorder [9].
- Population
- 484 participants in 24 studies [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Small studies, and outcomes were self-reported. The authors call for more well-controlled trials [9].
Preventing winter depression
Shown to lower new episodes of seasonal depression in adults with a history of it, with 84% staying depression-free against 72% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Started in autumn before symptoms and continued to spring, extended-release bupropion lowered the risk of a depressive episode (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.72). The number needed to treat was 8 where the yearly recurrence rate is 30% and 4 where it is 60%. Headache, insomnia and nausea were more frequent than on placebo [7]. Across the three trials, 84.3% on bupropion and 72.0% on placebo stayed free of a depressive episode [8].
- Population
- 1,100 adults with a history of seasonal affective disorder in 3 RCTs [7][8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- All three trials had high dropout, and the review rated the evidence moderate quality. The review found no trials comparing bupropion with light therapy or psychological therapy [7].
ADHD
Shown to reduce ADHD symptoms in adults by a moderate amount in a Cochrane review of six small trials rated low quality. Not an approved use.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Long-acting bupropion lowered the severity of ADHD symptoms against placebo (SMD -0.50, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.15, 3 studies, 129 participants) and raised the share with clinical improvement (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.99). Withdrawal for adverse effects was similar to placebo (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.10) [12]. In children and adolescents, three head-to-head trials found bupropion comparable to methylphenidate, while a large placebo-controlled study found smaller effects than methylphenidate [13].
- Population
- 438 adults in 6 studies of 6 to 10 weeks [12]; open and randomized trials in children and adolescents [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Four of six adult studies were industry funded, none was judged free of bias, and samples were small [12]. The pediatric review calls its database very limited [13].
Stroke and heart events against placebo
Shown to lower stroke from 3.4% to 1.9% and total cardiovascular events from 8.0% to 5.7% against placebo, with no significant change in deaths.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review found first-line calcium channel blockers lowered stroke (3.4% with control against 1.9%, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.84) and total cardiovascular events (8.0% against 5.7%, RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.87). Coronary heart disease (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.09) and mortality (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.09) did not differ significantly [3]. In the Syst-Eur trial of nitrendipine-based treatment, stroke fell from 13.7 to 7.9 events per 1,000 patient-years (42% reduction) and all cardiovascular endpoints fell 31%, with no significant change in all-cause mortality [2].
- Population
- Adults with moderate to severe primary hypertension, mean age 56, within a review of 24 trials and 58,040 people across drug classes [3]; 4,695 adults over 60 with isolated systolic hypertension, median 2 years [2].
- Sources
- [3], [2]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane authors rated this evidence low quality [3]. The trial evidence is for a dihydropyridine [2].
Anxiety
Shown to lower anxiety in people with anxiety disorders across 8 small studies, with a confidence interval close to zero.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 8 studies (316 participants) found CBD lowered anxiety (Hedges' g -0.92, 95% CI -1.80 to -0.04) across generalized anxiety, social anxiety and PTSD [6].
- Population
- People with anxiety disorders [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Small total sample, and the authors urge caution [6]. The confidence interval runs close to zero.
Preventing migraine with gepants
Shown to reduce monthly migraine days with atogepant, with a 50% responder rate about 1.7 times placebo's. Rimegepant every other day cut 0.8 more days than placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Atogepant reduced monthly migraine days (SMD -0.40, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.34) and acute medication days (SMD -0.45), and raised the share with a 50% drop in migraine days (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.89), with no added benefit at higher doses [5]. Rimegepant 75 mg every other day reduced monthly migraine days by 4.3 against 3.5 on placebo over weeks 9 to 12 [6].
- Population
- 2,813 adults in 4 atogepant trials [5]; 695 adults with episodic migraine analyzed in one 12-week rimegepant trial [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis for atogepant and one trial for rimegepant prevention.
Migraine, compared with other control conditions
Shown to reduce migraine days by a small amount in a meta-analysis of 5 trials, a result the authors called preliminary.
Compared with control conditions the source abstract does not describe [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Spinal manipulation reduced migraine days (Hedges' g -0.35, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.16) and migraine pain or intensity. One trial in chronic migraine was left out of the pooled analysis because it made heterogeneity high [8].
- Population
- 677 people in 6 trials, with treatment lasting 2 to 6 months [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Several trials were at high or unclear risk of bias for blinding, compliance and missing data [8].
Children exposed to alcohol before birth
Shown to improve memory in children exposed to alcohol before birth when choline was given in pregnancy, though each pooled result rests on 2 trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 5 trials, prenatal choline improved memory (SMD 0.61, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.02, 2 trials, 94 participants, moderate certainty) and postnatal choline improved global cognition (SMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.34, 2 trials, 62 participants, low certainty) [4]. On 2 g of choline a day from mid-pregnancy, infants were more likely than placebo to meet the eyeblink conditioning criterion at 6.5 months. They showed catch-up growth in weight and head size, and higher visual recognition memory at 12 months [5]. In 3 pooled trials of children aged 2.5 to 5.9 with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, 9 months of choline gave 25% better scores than placebo on a sequential memory task, with no change in executive function or IQ [6]. About 5 years later, children who had received choline scored 9.1% better on non-verbal IQ and 11.3% better on working memory [7].
- Population
- 69 heavy-drinking pregnant women in Cape Town, South Africa [5]. 104 children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder [6], 58 of them seen at a mean age of 9.1 [7].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Each pooled estimate rests on 2 trials [4]. The authors call [5] exploratory and describe the memory advantage in [6] as trend-level. The follow-up saw 58 of 104 children [7].
Quitting smoking
Shown to raise quit rates against placebo, with about 1.9 times the odds, in a Cochrane review of six small trials, with frequent dry mouth and sedation.
Compared with placebo [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The pooled odds ratio for quitting with clonidine against placebo was 1.89 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.74). Only one of the six trials was significant on its own. Dose-dependent side effects, particularly dry mouth and sedation, were frequent [8].
- Population
- Smokers in six trials, three of oral and three of patch clonidine, most with counseling [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Few trials, with potential sources of bias [8]. Clonidine is not approved for quitting smoking.
Opioid withdrawal
Shown to make severe opioid withdrawal less likely and completing withdrawal more likely than placebo, with results similar to a methadone taper but more low blood pressure.
Compared with placebo and reducing doses of methadone [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against placebo, alpha-2 agonists lowered the chance of severe withdrawal (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.57) and raised treatment completion (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.84). Against a methadone taper, withdrawal severity and completion did not differ significantly, symptoms resolved sooner, and hypotensive or other adverse effects were more likely (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.10) [9].
- Population
- 1,728 people withdrawing from heroin or methadone in 26 trials, 148 in the placebo comparisons [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- The review pooled clonidine with lofexidine, and the placebo comparisons were small [9].
Migraine frequency
Shown to reduce migraine frequency and attack duration in adults with migraine, across 6 small studies. Severity did not change.
Depression
Linked to 24% lower risk of depression at the highest coffee intake than the lowest, and 8% lower per daily cup, in observational studies.
Compared with the lowest consumption level [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against the lowest level of consumption, the pooled relative risk of depression was 0.757 (95% CI 0.624 to 0.917) for coffee and 0.721 (95% CI 0.522 to 0.997) for caffeine. Each extra cup a day was linked to 8% lower risk (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97) [11].
- Population
- 330,677 participants in 7 studies of coffee, and 38,223 in 8 studies of caffeine [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The review pooled case-control, cohort and cross-sectional studies. People with low mood may drink less coffee, which runs the link backward.
Anxiety disorders, long-term
Shown to keep anxiety lower than control conditions for up to 12 months, and past 12 months for generalized anxiety, social anxiety and PTSD, in mostly low-quality trials.
Compared with care as usual, relaxation, psychoeducation, pill placebo, supportive therapy or waiting list [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- CBT was associated with better outcomes at treatment end and at 1 to 6 and 6 to 12 months for generalized anxiety disorder (g 0.07 to 0.40), panic disorder (g 0.22 to 0.35), social anxiety disorder (g 0.34 to 0.60), specific phobia (g 0.49 to 0.72), PTSD (g 0.59 to 0.72) and OCD (g 0.70 to 0.85). At 12 months or more, effects remained for generalized anxiety (g 0.22), social anxiety (g 0.42) and PTSD (g 0.84), and not for panic disorder [8].
- Population
- 4,118 adult outpatients in 69 trials [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Trials were mainly of low quality, and relapse rates of 0% to 14% came from only 6 trials [8].
Insomnia, online CBT
Shown to improve insomnia severity, sleep efficiency and sleep onset when delivered over the internet, by amounts similar to those reported for face-to-face CBT.
Compared with control conditions the source abstract does not describe [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Internet-delivered CBT for insomnia improved insomnia severity, sleep efficiency, sleep quality, wake after sleep onset, sleep onset latency, total sleep time and night awakenings, with effect sizes from g 0.21 to 1.09, generally maintained at 4 to 48 weeks. Longer programs and more clinician support were associated with larger effects [12].
- Population
- 1,460 participants in 11 trials [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- The comparison with face-to-face CBT sets results from different trials side by side [12].
Chronic pain
Shown to ease chronic pain, disability and distress slightly more than usual treatment. Against other active treatments the benefit was very small and did not last.
Compared with treatment as usual [15]; active control treatments [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against treatment as usual, CBT lowered pain (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.10, 29 trials), disability (SMD -0.32) and distress (SMD -0.34) at treatment end, effects largely maintained at follow-up. Against active controls, benefits were very small for pain (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.01, 23 trials), disability (SMD -0.12) and distress (SMD -0.09), and not maintained at follow-up [15].
- Population
- 59 CBT trials among 75 studies with 9,401 adults, mostly with fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain, rheumatoid arthritis or mixed chronic pain [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality ranged from moderate to low, and most trials were at high or unclear risk of bias. Headache was excluded [15].
Depressive symptoms
Linked to 22% fewer people with depressive symptoms at 7,000 steps a day than at 2,000, in one meta-analysis of three cohorts.
Compared with 2,000 steps a day [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against 2,000 steps a day, 7,000 steps was linked to a 22% lower risk of depressive symptoms (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.83), with a linear pattern. Certainty was rated moderate [4].
- Population
- 3 cohort studies [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Observational and only three studies. Low mood itself lowers activity, so reverse causation is likely in part.
Dementia
Linked to 38% less dementia at 7,000 steps a day than at 2,000, in one meta-analysis of two cohorts.
Compared with 2,000 steps a day [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against 2,000 steps a day, 7,000 steps was linked to a 38% lower risk of dementia (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.73, I² 0%), with a non-linear pattern [4].
- Population
- 2 cohort studies [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Observational and only two studies. Dementia develops for years before diagnosis and lowers activity in that time, so reverse causation is a strong candidate.
Mood and anxiety
Shown to ease depressive and anxiety symptoms in the short term, in one meta-analysis of 9 small studies of cocoa-rich products.
Compared with control conditions the abstract does not describe [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Cocoa-rich products lowered depressive symptoms (Hedges' g -0.42, 95% CI -0.67 to -0.17) and anxiety symptoms (g -0.49), and improved positive (g 0.41) and negative affect (g -0.47) [7].
- Population
- 9 studies, 5 of a single dose, 2 of 3 days and 2 of more than a week [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Few participants and short studies, so the results do not cover regular intake over months [7].
Child development after seafood in pregnancy
Linked to better social-emotional, behavioral and overall development scores in children whose mothers ate more seafood in pregnancy, with inconsistent results for overall cognition.
Compared with children whose mothers ate less seafood in pregnancy [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 40 articles (1 randomized trial, 24 prospective cohorts and 1 retrospective cohort), higher seafood intake in pregnancy was related to better social-emotional and behavioral development from birth to 18 years and better aggregate development scores before age 4. Evidence for overall cognitive development was inconsistent, with possible links to attention, reasoning and problem-solving, and verbal intelligence. Results were inconsistent for movement and language, and few studies covered ADHD and autism [13]. The FDA states that moderate scientific evidence shows fish intake in pregnancy can help a baby's cognitive development [1].
- Population
- Pregnant women and their children aged 0 to 18 years. No studies of seafood during breastfeeding were found [13].
- Sources
- [13], [1]
- Caveats
- Certainty was very low to moderate because of the lack of randomized trials [13]. Families who eat more seafood may differ in income and education, which the cohorts may not fully adjust for.
Depression symptoms
Shown to lower depression symptoms modestly in people with symptoms, with EPA-rich formulas only. Not shown to prevent depression.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 26 double-blind trials (2,160 participants) of people with depression symptoms, omega-3 lowered symptom scores by an SMD of -0.28. Formulations with 60% or more EPA at 1 g a day or less showed benefit (SMD -1.03 for EPA-major), and DHA-pure or DHA-major formulations did not [23]. For prevention, 31 trials (41,470 participants) found little or no effect on the risk of depression symptoms (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10) or anxiety symptoms [24].
- Population
- People with depression symptoms in treatment trials [23]; adults with or without depression followed for 6 to 12 months or more in prevention trials [24].
- Sources
- [23], [24]
- Caveats
- The treatment and prevention reviews ask different questions. In [24], effects on depression severity in existing depression were rated very-low-quality evidence.
Autism and neurodevelopment in children (use in pregnancy)
Linked to about 30% lower autism risk and lower ADHD odds in children whose mothers took folic acid, in observational studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2025 umbrella review of 23 systematic reviews found maternal folic acid linked to lower odds of autism (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.79), ADHD (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.95) and behavioral problems (OR 0.75). Motor, cognitive and language development showed no association [16]. A second umbrella review of 8 meta-analyses (101 studies, over 3 million mother and child pairs) found folic acid linked to 30% lower autism risk (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83) [17].
- Population
- Mother and child pairs in observational studies [16][17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- All underlying studies were observational, so they cannot show cause. Half the reviews in [16] were rated very low quality. A 2026 review of excess intake linked high folic acid and high blood folate in pregnancy with adverse neurodevelopment in offspring [18].
Fibromyalgia
Shown to give at least 50% pain relief to about 22% to 24% of people with fibromyalgia on pregabalin, against about 14% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- With pregabalin 300 to 600 mg a day, about 22% to 24% had at least 50% pain reduction after 12 or 13 weeks against about 14% on placebo, and 39% to 43% had at least 30% reduction against about 28%. Numbers needed to treat ranged from 7 to 14 [3]. For gabapentin, one 12-week trial found at least 30% pain reduction in 49% (38 of 75) against 31% (23 of 75) on placebo, and the reviewers judged the evidence insufficient to support or refute a benefit [4].
- Population
- 3,283 participants in 5 pregabalin trials of 8 to 13 weeks [3]; 150 participants in one gabapentin trial [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for pregabalin, rated high quality. The gabapentin trial was rated very low quality, and gabapentin is not approved for fibromyalgia. About 9 in 100 people gained substantial benefit beyond placebo.
Alcohol use disorder
Shown to reduce the percentage of heavy drinking days on gabapentin in adults with alcohol use disorder, with other drinking outcomes not clearly different from placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 7 trials, every drinking outcome leaned toward gabapentin, but only the percentage of heavy drinking days showed clear benefit (g -0.64, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.06) [15]. In a randomized trial, 27% on gabapentin had no heavy drinking days against 9% on placebo (number needed to treat 5.4), and 18% against 4% were abstinent (number needed to treat 6.2). The benefit appeared in people with more alcohol withdrawal symptoms before the trial and not in those with fewer [16].
- Population
- 7 randomized trials [15]; 90 evaluable adults with alcohol use disorder and a history of withdrawal symptoms, mean age 49.6 [16].
- Sources
- [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Not an approved use. The evidence is for gabapentin. See the misuse block below.
Stress and anxiety
Shown to lower self-rated stress with horticultural therapy in one meta-analysis, without changing physiological measures. A community gardening trial found larger falls in stress and anxiety.
Compared with a control group the abstract does not describe [6]; a waiting list for a community garden plot [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Horticultural therapy improved psychological stress measures against control, with no significant effect on physiological measures. A total of 100 to 500 minutes gave larger effects [6]. People given a community garden plot had greater reductions in perceived stress and anxiety from spring to autumn than those kept on the waiting list [7].
- Population
- Trials of horticultural therapy in varied populations [6]. 291 adults new to gardening in Denver and Aurora, Colorado, 82% women [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- The meta-analysis abstract gives no pooled sizes [6]. Stress and anxiety were secondary outcomes in the trial and were self-rated [7].
Fullness
Shown to raise fullness ratings after higher-protein meals in tightly controlled preload studies of healthy adults.
Compared with diets with less protein
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 5 preload studies, higher-protein preloads raised fullness over 2 to 4 hours more than lower-protein preloads (2,435.74 mm·240 min, 95% CI 1,375.18 to 3,496.31). A directional count of 28 studies also favored higher protein [7]. In weight-loss trials, 3 of 5 studies reported greater satiety with high protein [1].
- Population
- Healthy adults given intact protein by mouth [7]; adults in weight-loss trials [1].
- Sources
- [1], [7]
- Caveats
- The authors caution against extending these results to everyday eating, body weight or health outcomes [7].
Dementia in cohorts
Linked to more dementia at higher levels, 35% higher odds for each 5 µmol/L across 8 pooled cohorts.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 8 cohort studies, each 5 µmol/L higher serum homocysteine had an odds ratio for new dementia of 1.35 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.79), or 1.50 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.00) after adjustment for regression dilution [10]. In the Framingham Study, each standard deviation higher log homocysteine had a relative risk of dementia of 1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9), and a level above 14 µmol/L nearly doubled the risk of Alzheimer's disease [11]. A consensus statement reports relative risks from 1.15 to 2.5 across clinical studies [2].
- Population
- 8,669 participants in 8 cohorts, mean ages 47 to 81, median study duration 5 years [10]. 1,092 people without dementia, mean age 76, 111 cases over a median 8 years [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [2]
- Caveats
- Observational. The meta-analysis authors state that the results do not provide evidence of cause and effect [10].
Generalized anxiety
Shown to reduce generalized anxiety scores more than placebo over 4 to 12 weeks, by about 2.5 to 3.5 points on the Hamilton anxiety scale.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of 5 studies found hydroxyzine more efficacious than placebo for generalized anxiety disorder (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.58), and equivalent to chlordiazepoxide (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.62) and buspirone (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.42) [1]. In a 12-week trial of 50 mg a day, Hamilton anxiety scores fell by 12.16 points on hydroxyzine and 9.64 on placebo, with responder and remission rates also favoring hydroxyzine and no significant difference from the benzodiazepine bromazepam [2]. In a 4-week trial, scores improved by 10.75 points on hydroxyzine and 7.23 on placebo, and buspirone did not differ from placebo on that measure [3]. In a second 4-week trial, anxiety scores were lower than placebo from the first week [4].
- Population
- 884 participants in 5 studies [1]; 334 outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder [2]; 244 primary care patients, 70% women, mean age 41 [3]; 133 patients [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane authors found a high risk of bias, few studies and small samples, and did not consider hydroxyzine a reliable first-line treatment on that basis [1]. The label states that use as an antianxiety agent beyond 4 months has not been assessed in systematic clinical studies [5].
Vascular dementia
Shown to raise cognitive test scores by 4 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination when added to drug treatment for vascular dementia, in one meta-analysis of Chinese trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 25 RCTs (1,954 patients), adding hyperbaric oxygen to drug and conventional treatment improved Mini-Mental State Examination scores (mean difference 4.00, 95% CI 3.28 to 4.73) and activities of daily living. Adverse event rates did not differ between groups (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.78) [8].
- Population
- 1,954 people with vascular dementia in 25 trials, 24 of which combined hyperbaric oxygen with a drug such as oxiracetam or donepezil [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- The abstract does not report blinding, sham controls or risk of bias ratings. Trials were located largely through Chinese databases.
Acute migraine
Shown to relieve an acute migraine attack compared with sham in a Cochrane review of 3 small trials, at low quality. It did not prevent attacks.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pooled data from 3 trials (58 participants) found hyperbaric oxygen more likely than sham to relieve a migraine headache (risk ratio 6.21, 95% CI 2.41 to 16.00). There was no evidence that it prevented migraine episodes, reduced nausea and vomiting, or reduced the need for rescue medication [9].
- Population
- 58 participants in 3 trials, within a review of 11 trials and 209 participants covering oxygen therapies for migraine and cluster headache [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- The reviewers rated the evidence low quality, downgraded for small crossover studies with incomplete reporting, and noted the cost and poor availability of chambers [9].
Pain in lab tests in healthy people
Shown to lower pain from lab pain tests in healthy volunteers (Hedges' g 0.54 to 0.76), mainly in people who respond strongly to suggestion.
Compared with no intervention [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Hypnosis lowered pain ratings and raised pain threshold and tolerance (g 0.54 to 0.76). With direct suggestions of pain relief, 42% of highly suggestible people and 29% of moderately suggestible people had clinically meaningful pain reductions, and people low in suggestibility gained little [15].
- Population
- 3,632 healthy participants in 85 mostly crossover trials using experimentally caused pain [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- Pain was induced in a lab, and the authors call for clinical data to show the effect carries over to chronic pain [15].
Anxiety
Shown to reduce anxiety more than control conditions, with the average treated person improving more than 79% of controls, and more when combined with other psychological treatment.
Compared with control conditions the source abstract does not describe [18]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At the end of treatment, 17 trials gave a mean weighted effect size of 0.79, and at the longest follow-up 7 trials gave 0.99. Hypnosis reduced anxiety more when combined with other psychological interventions than when used alone [18].
- Population
- 17 trials in 15 studies [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- The abstract does not describe the control conditions or the populations [18].
Mood and thinking
Shown to improve anxiety, memory and intelligence scores modestly in iron-deficient children and menstruating adults, with no effect in those without deficiency.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In RCTs of non-anemic children, adolescents and menstruating adults, iron improved anxiety symptoms (d 0.34), physical well-being (d 0.42), cognitive intelligence scores (d 0.46) and short-term memory (d 0.53), and did not change attention or depression [5]. An umbrella review of 17 systematic reviews in children found modest gains in intelligence, memory and attention in anemic children, negligible or uncertain effects in children without deficiency, and no consistent change in broader mental development or school achievement [8].
- Population
- 1,408 participants in 18 studies [5]. Children in 17 systematic reviews, 3 rated high confidence [8].
- Sources
- [5], [8]
- Caveats
- The two reviews studied different groups. The 2025 abstract gives effect sizes without confidence intervals, and the effects were absent in participants without iron deficiency [5].
Restless legs
Shown to lower restless legs scores about 5 points and double the share who improved, pooling oral and intravenous iron.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 12 RCTs (511 patients), iron lowered the International RLS score by 5.28 points against placebo (95% CI -7.66 to -2.90), doubled the number of patients whose score improved (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.84), and improved RLS quality of life (MD 7.42) and a sleep scale (MD -24.83) [9].
- Population
- Patients with restless legs syndrome [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Oral and intravenous iron were pooled, and the authors single out intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. Overall adverse events were twice as common on iron (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.85), with no difference in serious events [9].
Treatment-resistant depression, esketamine nasal spray
Shown to lower depression scores in treatment-resistant depression by about 4 to 7 points more than placebo on a 60-point scale after 4 weeks.
Compared with placebo nasal spray, with or without a new oral antidepressant [4]; placebo in pooled trials [1][2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- With a newly started oral antidepressant, esketamine 56 or 84 mg lowered MADRS scores by 19.8 points against 15.8 on placebo spray, a difference of 4.0 (95% CI 0.6 to 7.3), most of it visible at 24 hours. As monotherapy, the differences were 5.1 points at 56 mg and 6.8 at 84 mg [4]. A Cochrane review found esketamine likely raised remission at 24 hours (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.71 to 4.40, moderate certainty) and raised response (OR 2.11) [1]. A second meta-analysis found effects during repeated esketamine dosing did not differ significantly from control (SMD -0.15 to -0.22) [2].
- Population
- 223 adults aged 18 to 64 in one 4-week trial, and 378 in a monotherapy trial [4]; 894 to 1,071 adults in 5 esketamine trials [1]; esketamine trials within 49 [2].
- Sources
- [4], [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The pooled analyses disagree on whether esketamine keeps its edge during repeated dosing [2]. Both arms improved a lot in the label trials, so the difference is smaller than each group's change [4].
Staying well on esketamine
Shown to delay relapse in people who had improved on esketamine, about half the hazard of relapse after a switch to placebo spray.
Compared with switching to placebo nasal spray, with the oral antidepressant continued [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In adults in stable remission after at least 16 weeks of esketamine plus an oral antidepressant, continuing esketamine lengthened time to relapse (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.84). In stable responders not in remission, the HR was 0.30 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.55) [4].
- Population
- Adults aged 18 to 64 who had remitted or responded on esketamine, in one randomized withdrawal trial [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The label notes the hazard ratio did not appear constant over the trial [4]. Only people who had already responded were enrolled.
Sleep
Shown to improve self-rated sleep onset, daytime function and sleep quality modestly in people of all ages.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 18 RCTs pooled (897 participants across 19 articles), theanine improved self-rated sleep onset latency (SMD 0.15, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.29), daytime dysfunction (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.49) and overall sleep quality score (SMD 0.43, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.83) [6]. In a 4-week crossover trial of 200 mg a day in 30 adults, PSQI scores for sleep latency, sleep disturbance and use of sleep medication fell compared with placebo [7].
- Population
- People of all ages and health status [6]. 30 adults without major psychiatric illness [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- The review authors note a lack of studies on pure theanine [6]. The crossover trial was funded by Taiyo Kagaku, which supplied the theanine, and two authors were its employees [7].
Drug-resistant focal epilepsy, added to other seizure drugs
Shown to make a halving of seizure frequency about 1.8 times as likely as placebo when added to other drugs in drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Compared with placebo added to existing seizure drugs [7][4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 50% or greater fall in seizure frequency was more likely on add-on lamotrigine than add-on placebo (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.23), and withdrawal from treatment for any reason did not clearly differ (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.37) [7]. In one label trial, median partial seizure frequency fell 36% at 500 mg a day, 20% at 300 mg and 8% on placebo. In a children's trial, it fell 36% against 7% [4].
- Population
- 1,806 infants, children and adults in 14 trials lasting 8 to 36 weeks [7]; 216 adults in one trial and 199 children aged 2 to 16 in another [4].
- Sources
- [7], [4]
- Caveats
- The trials were short and give no long-term evidence [7]. Only the 500 mg dose separated from placebo in the adult label trial [4].
Anxiety
Shown to lower anxiety in pooled trials, including state anxiety after a single session and trait anxiety after a course of treatment.
Compared with control conditions in randomized studies the source abstract does not describe [12]; active treatments [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 37 randomized studies found single sessions reduced state anxiety, and a course of treatment reduced trait anxiety and depression, its largest effects, by amounts the authors likened to psychotherapy [12]. Against active comparators in pain populations, anxiety was lower with massage (SMD -0.57) [2].
- Population
- 37 randomized studies [12]. Trials in people with pain [2].
- Sources
- [12], [2]
- Caveats
- The older meta-analysis predates many current trials and its abstract gives no effect sizes [12]. Participants cannot be blinded to massage.
Depression
Shown to lower depressive symptoms against control groups in a meta-analysis of 17 trials, with a moderate pooled effect.
Compared with control groups the source abstract does not describe [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 17 randomized trials, the pooled standardized mean difference was 0.73 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.93) in the random-effects model, favoring massage [15]. An earlier meta-analysis found reductions in depression among massage's largest effects [12].
- Population
- 786 people with depression in 17 trials, excluding infants and pregnant women [15]. 37 randomized studies [12].
- Sources
- [15], [12]
- Caveats
- Trials were of moderate quality, used different massage protocols and depression scales, and may be heterogeneous [15].
Anxiety
Shown to ease anxiety in adults with health conditions against time-matched control programs, and an 8-week course matched escitalopram in one trial of anxiety disorders.
Compared with active control programs matched for time and attention [3]; escitalopram 10 to 20 mg [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In trials with active controls, mindfulness programs improved anxiety by an effect size of 0.38 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.64) at 8 weeks and 0.22 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.43) at 3 to 6 months, rated moderate evidence [3]. In 208 adults with a diagnosed anxiety disorder, anxiety severity fell 1.35 points with mindfulness-based stress reduction and 1.43 with escitalopram on a 7-point clinician scale. The difference of -0.07 (95% CI -0.38 to 0.23) met the trial's noninferiority margin [4].
- Population
- 3,515 participants in 47 trials of adults with clinical conditions [3]. 208 adults with a diagnosed anxiety disorder, 75% women, mean age 33, at 3 US academic centers [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The escitalopram trial had no placebo or waiting list arm, so it shows the two did not differ, not how much either did beyond time and expectation [4]. The effect against active controls was small and smaller at follow-up [3].
Sleep quality
Shown to improve sleep quality slightly more than time-matched control programs in one meta-analysis, and no differently from established sleep treatments.
Compared with nonspecific active controls matched for time and attention [10]; evidence-based sleep treatments [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against nonspecific active controls, sleep quality improved after the program (ES 0.33, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.48) and at follow-up (ES 0.54, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84), at moderate strength of evidence. Against specific active controls such as evidence-based sleep treatments there was no difference after the program (ES 0.03, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.49) or at follow-up (ES -0.14) [10]. An earlier review found low or insufficient evidence for any effect on sleep [3].
- Population
- 1,654 participants in 18 trials [10]. 47 trials [3].
- Sources
- [10], [3]
- Caveats
- The reviewers call the findings preliminary [10]. Sleep was mostly self-rated.
Cortisol
Shown to lower cortisol in pooled trials. Blood cortisol fell only in people with a physical illness, and saliva cortisol did not fall significantly in one review.
Compared with control groups [15]; inactive controls and active controls [16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 10 trials using blood samples, meditation had a significant medium effect on cortisol from before to after against control, present only in samples with a somatic illness. In 21 trials using saliva the effect was small and not significant [15]. Across 34 between-group comparisons, mindfulness-based stress reduction lowered cortisol more than controls (g = -0.38, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.21), against inactive controls g = -0.42 and against active controls g = -0.29 (95% CI -0.54 to -0.04) [16].
- Population
- Participants in 10 randomized trials with blood samples and 21 with saliva samples [15]. 2,059 participants in 39 studies [16].
- Sources
- [15], [16]
- Caveats
- The second review pools blood and saliva samples and found unexplained heterogeneity [16]. Cortisol varies across the day, and timing of samples differs between trials.
Focus, memory and thinking skills, against no program
Shown to improve thinking skills very slightly in one meta-analysis, mainly executive function and working memory, against inactive comparisons such as a waiting list.
Compared with inactive comparators [19]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pooling all cognitive domains, mindfulness programs outperformed comparators (g = 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.24). By domain, effects appeared for executive function (g = 0.15) and working memory (g = 0.23) only. Programs outperformed inactive comparators but not active ones [19].
- Population
- 2,931 adults in 56 randomized studies [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- Most trials had unclear risk of bias, and some p-values were unreliable [19].
Time to fall asleep and total sleep in sleep disorders
Shown to shorten time to fall asleep about 7 minutes and add about 8 minutes of sleep in people with primary sleep disorders.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 19 studies (1,683 subjects) with primary sleep disorders, melatonin reduced sleep onset latency by 7.06 minutes (95% CI 4.37 to 9.75), increased total sleep time by 8.25 minutes (95% CI 1.74 to 14.75), and improved sleep quality (SMD 0.22, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.32). Longer trials and higher doses showed larger effects on latency and total sleep, and the effects did not fade with continued use [1].
- Population
- Adults and children with primary sleep disorders [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The authors note the absolute benefit is smaller than with other insomnia drugs [1].
Sleep quality in adults with other conditions
Shown to improve sleep quality scores about 1.2 points in adults with other conditions, with results varying by condition and no clear change in cancer.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 23 RCTs, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores improved by 1.24 points (95% CI -1.77 to -0.71, I² 80.7%). Improvements were 2.20 points in respiratory diseases, 2.74 in metabolic disorders and 0.67 in sleep disorders, with no effect found in mental disorders or neurodegenerative diseases [2]. Later reviews in neurodegenerative disease differ. In Parkinson's disease, PSQI scores improved by 1.75 points across 7 RCTs (409 patients, 95% CI -2.94 to -0.55) [3], and by 2.90 points at doses above 4 mg but not at 4 mg or less across 5 RCTs (206 patients) [4]. In 10 RCTs of adults 65 and over with mild cognitive impairment or dementia (516 people), total sleep time rose by 12.4 minutes (95% CI 8.1 to 16.7) [5]. In 7 pooled trials in people with cancer, sleep quality did not change significantly (SMD -0.85, 95% CI -2.46 to 0.76, I² 94.5%) [6].
- Population
- Adults with respiratory, metabolic, sleep and other disorders [2]; people with Parkinson's disease [3][4]; older adults with cognitive impairment [5]; people with cancer [6].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was high, and health status explained part of it [2]. The Parkinson's improvements in subjective sleep quality did not reach the minimal clinically important difference [3]. Heterogeneity was 72% for total sleep time in [5] and 94.5% in [6].
Jet lag
Shown to reduce jet lag after flights crossing five or more time zones when taken near bedtime at the destination. Doses above 5 mg did no better.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Nine of ten trials found melatonin taken near target bedtime at the destination (10 pm to midnight) reduced jet lag after flights crossing five or more time zones. Doses of 0.5 to 5 mg gave similar results, people fell asleep faster after 5 mg than 0.5 mg, and doses above 5 mg did no better. The number needed to treat was 2. Benefit was smaller for westward flights, and dosing early in the day was liable to cause sleepiness and delay adaptation [7].
- Population
- Airline passengers, airline staff and military personnel in 10 RCTs [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The review dates from 2002. One of the ten trials had a design fault and could not be used [7].
Sleep in children
Shown to improve sleep onset or sleep time in children with autism, cerebral palsy, atopic dermatitis or other neurologic conditions. No data in typically developing young children.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In children with autism, melatonin improved sleep quality (Hedges' g 0.75) and total sleep time (g 0.58) [8]. In 3 RCTs in children with atopic dermatitis, 3 to 6 mg a day shortened sleep onset latency (SMD -0.63, 95% CI -1.00 to -0.26) without a significant change in total sleep time (18.29 minutes, 95% CI -10.31 to 46.88) [9]. In 120 children aged 3 to 12 with cerebral palsy, 3 to 10 mg a day for 12 weeks gave 1.31 hours more total sleep and 27.72 minutes faster sleep onset than placebo [10]. A systematic review of children aged 0 to 6 found 6 trials (167 children), all in children with neurologic conditions, that reported improved sleep onset with few adverse events [11].
- Population
- Children with autism [8], atopic dermatitis [9], cerebral palsy [10] or other neurologic conditions [11].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- No efficacy data were found for young children with typical development, and long-term outcomes were absent [11]. The atopic dermatitis review pooled only 3 trials [9].
Depressive symptoms in perimenopause
Shown to lower depressive symptoms slightly in perimenopausal women with depressive symptoms, with no benefit in women not selected for them.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In placebo-controlled trials, hormone therapy was associated with a small reduction in depressive symptom severity (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.03). No clear difference was seen by route [11].
- Population
- Perimenopausal women with depressive symptoms in 12 RCTs [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The authors rate certainty as limited [11]. A systematic review of 17 RCTs in younger menopausal women, not selected for depressive symptoms, found no benefit on depression [12].
Insomnia
Shown to lower insomnia severity by about 6 points more than placebo at 6 weeks on low-dose mirtazapine, with no difference from placebo from 12 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In adults with insomnia disorder in general practice, low-dose mirtazapine lowered Insomnia Severity Index scores by 6.0 points more than placebo at 6 weeks (95% CI 3.0 to 9.0). Improvement and recovery rates were 52% and 56% against 14% on placebo. From 12 weeks onward scores did not differ from placebo [3]. In adults aged 65 and over, 28 days of mirtazapine 7.5 mg lowered scores by 6.5 points against 2.9 on placebo, and improved self-rated time awake in the night, total sleep time and sleep efficiency. Six people on mirtazapine and one on placebo stopped because of adverse events [4].
- Population
- 80 adults with insomnia disorder and trouble staying asleep [3]; 60 adults aged 65 and over with chronic insomnia [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Two small trials. Not an approved use. The authors of [3] concluded the results do not support use for several months.
Sleepiness in shift work disorder
Shown to reduce sleepiness on night shifts in people diagnosed with shift work disorder, about 1 point on a 10-point scale. No trials tested shift workers without the disorder.
Compared with placebo [6][7][8]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Armodafinil taken before the night shift lowered Karolinska Sleepiness Scale scores by 0.99 points (95% CI 0.67 to 1.32, range 1 to 10) and sped simple reaction time by 50 milliseconds at 3 months. Modafinil lowered the same score by 0.90 points (95% CI 0.35 to 1.45) [7]. In the pivotal 3-month trial, modafinil 200 mg lengthened nighttime time to fall asleep by 1.7 minutes against 0.3 on placebo, and 74% against 36% were rated clinically improved [8]. The armodafinil label reports the same kind of trial results for 150 mg [6].
- Population
- 2 armodafinil trials with 572 participants and 1 modafinil trial with 183, within a Cochrane review of 15 trials and 718 shift workers [7]; 209 patients with shift work disorder [8].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The trial authors noted that treated patients remained very sleepy at night [8]. The Cochrane review found no trials in shift workers without a diagnosed disorder, and rated the evidence moderate quality [7].
Alertness and performance during sleep deprivation
Shown to keep sleep-deprived healthy people awake and to hold memory and executive function better than placebo, though repeated doses did not prevent decline over longer deprivation.
Compared with placebo [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In sleep-deprived individuals, modafinil maintained wakefulness, memory and executive function to a significantly greater degree than placebo. Over longer sleep deprivation, repeated doses did not prevent cognitive performance from deteriorating, while wakefulness was maintained and people possibly became overconfident about their own performance [12].
- Population
- Healthy adults in single- or double-blind randomized trials [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis, and the abstract does not give pooled effect sizes or head counts [12].
Depression, as an add-on
Shown to improve depression scores and remission modestly when added to standard treatment, in unipolar and bipolar depression, an off-label use.
Compared with placebo added to standard treatment [15][16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Added to first-line treatment, modafinil improved overall depression scores (point estimate -0.35, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.10) and remission (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.49), with a positive effect on fatigue and adverse events no different from placebo [15]. In bipolar depression, added modafinil or armodafinil raised response (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.37) and remission (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.73), with no rise in mood switching or suicide attempts [16].
- Population
- 910 adults with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression in 6 trials [15]; 795 on drug and 792 on placebo in 5 bipolar depression trials, 4 of them of armodafinil [16].
- Sources
- [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Few trials. Both reviews included bipolar trials, so they overlap. Not an FDA-approved use.
Memory and cognition in older adults
Shown to improve global cognition and memory slightly over 3 years in US adults 60 and older, all in one trial of one product.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In COSMOS-Mind (2,262 adults, mean age 73), a daily multivitamin improved a global cognition composite over 3 years (mean z 0.07, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.12) [7]. In COSMOS-Web (3,562 adults), immediate recall was better at 1 year and across 3 years, and secondary outcomes did not change [8]. Pooling three COSMOS substudies, global cognition improved by 0.07 SD units (95% CI 0.03 to 0.11) and episodic memory by 0.06 SD units (95% CI 0.03 to 0.10), which the authors equate to about 2 years of cognitive aging [9].
- Population
- US adults aged 60 and older in the COSMOS trial [7][8][9].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- All three come from one parent trial and one product. COSMOS-Web gave Centrum Silver [8]. Funder lists in Europe PMC include Pfizer [9] and BASF [8]. Participants were 89% non-Hispanic White in COSMOS-Mind [7].
Baclofen for alcohol dependence
Shown to raise days abstinent by about 9 percentage points and lower relapse slightly in alcohol dependence, with no change in heavy drinking days.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against placebo, baclofen raised the percentage of days abstinent (mean difference 9.07, 95% CI 3.30 to 14.85) and lowered the risk of relapse (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99). Heavy drinking days, drinks per drinking day, craving, anxiety and depression did not differ. Fatigue, dizziness, sleepiness, dry mouth, tingling and muscle spasms were more frequent on baclofen [13].
- Population
- 1,818 adults with alcohol dependence in 17 trials, 70% men, mean age 46.5, most treated for 12 weeks at 30 to 300 mg a day [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- The lower relapse risk held in people who had been detoxified first and not in other subgroups. Not an FDA-approved use [14].
Depression symptoms
Shown to lower depression scores slightly when added to treatment, mainly in bipolar disorder.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 12 studies (904 patients), adjunctive NAC lowered depression scores compared with placebo (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.05, I² 45%) [6].
- Population
- Patients with bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder, 1,000 to 3,000 mg a day for 8 to 24 weeks [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Wide confidence interval. The effect appeared mainly in bipolar disorder [6].
Naps during night shifts
Shown to improve cognitive performance during night shifts after a nap, mostly from 30 minutes after waking, in one meta-analysis. Memory dipped right after waking.
Compared with control conditions without a nap [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Performance improved after a night-shift nap against no nap (effect size 0.25, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.41). Gains were seen mainly 30 minutes after waking. Memory got worse immediately after waking, with no overall change in global performance at that point. Earlier naps in the night tended to help more [4].
- Population
- 494 participants in 18 studies, 6 in real work settings and 12 in laboratories. Mean nap 41.6 minutes, at a mean time of 2:12 a.m. [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis with few real-work studies. Safety, health and economic outcomes were not measured [4].
Nerve pain
Shown to give at least half pain relief to 53% on tramadol against 30% on placebo in small nerve pain trials the reviewers rated low quality.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 3 studies, 53% on tramadol and 30% on placebo had at least 50% pain relief (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.6), a number needed to treat of 4.4. Any adverse event was reported by 58% against 34%, and 16% against 3% withdrew over adverse events [11]. In 3 studies in painful diabetic neuropathy, at least moderate benefit was reported by 44% on modified-release oxycodone and 27% on placebo (number needed to treat 5.7). Any adverse event was reported by 86% against 63% [12].
- Population
- 438 adults with neuropathic pain for at least 3 months in 6 studies of tramadol lasting 4 to 6 weeks [11]; 687 adults in 5 studies of oxycodone, 637 with painful diabetic neuropathy and 50 with postherpetic neuralgia [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- The reviewers rated the tramadol evidence low quality and the oxycodone evidence very low quality, citing small studies, short duration and risk of bias. No oxycodone study reported at least 50% pain relief [12].
Migraine returning after emergency treatment
Shown to lower headache recurrence within 72 hours of emergency migraine treatment, with 9 treated to prevent one, using one injected dose of dexamethasone.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Added to standard migraine treatment, a single dose of dexamethasone did not change pain relief at the time (difference 0.37, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.94) and lowered recurrence within 72 hours (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.90), a number needed to treat of 9. Side effects were similar to placebo [15].
- Population
- Adults with acute migraine in 7 randomized trials [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- The trials gave dexamethasone by injection, not by mouth.
Depression in cohorts
Linked to 18% less depression at half the guideline amount and 25% less at the guideline amount, in one meta-analysis of cohorts, with smaller gains beyond.
Compared with adults reporting no activity [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against no activity, half the guideline volume (4.4 mMET-hours a week) was linked to 18% lower risk of depression (95% CI 13% to 23%) and the guideline volume (8.8 mMET-hours a week) to 25% lower risk (95% CI 18% to 32%), with diminishing returns and more uncertainty above that [15].
- Population
- 191,130 adults in 15 cohorts, followed at least 3 years [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- Observational, with large heterogeneity (I² 74%). Low mood lowers activity, which is reverse causation.
Stroke, heart events and death
Shown to lower stroke about 14% and death about 12% with a potassium salt substitute, mostly from one trial in older rural Chinese adults at high stroke risk.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Stroke was lower on a salt substitute of 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride than on regular salt (29.14 against 33.65 per 1,000 person-years, rate ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.96). Major cardiovascular events (rate ratio 0.87) and death (rate ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95) were also lower [6]. Pooled trials found lower total mortality (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.94) and cardiovascular events (RR 0.89) [2]. In cohort studies, higher potassium intake went with a 24% lower stroke risk (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.89) [1]. In a post hoc analysis of the same trial, total cancer did not differ (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.08), and stomach cancer showed a non-significant trend lower (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.08) [7].
- Population
- 20,995 people in 600 rural Chinese villages with prior stroke, or aged 60 or older with high blood pressure, mean follow-up 4.74 years [6][7]; 5 trials reporting clinical outcomes [2]; 11 cohorts with 127,038 people [1].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- One trial carries most of the clinical events, and it enrolled people at high stroke risk. Cochrane rated the effects as slight and the certainty moderate [3]. The trial was funded by Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council [6].
Depression and anxiety
Shown to lower depression and anxiety in adults with diagnosed disorders, with effect sizes varying widely. Anxiety did not change in children.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In clinically diagnosed samples, probiotics lowered depression (18 trials, SMD -0.96, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.61) and anxiety (9 trials, SMD -0.59, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.19) [29]. In 13 trials of major depression (710 patients), the pooled effect favored probiotics by an SMD of 0.38 [30]. A network meta-analysis put probiotics at SMD -0.62 against placebo in major depression [31]. A 2026 review found no significant effect in trials of 12 weeks or less and an effect in 2 longer trials [32]. In 7 RCTs of children and adolescents (912 participants), anxiety did not differ from placebo (SMD -0.09) [33].
- Population
- Adults with depression or anxiety disorders [29][30][31][32]. Children and adolescents [33].
- Sources
- [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]
- Caveats
- Effect sizes differ more than twofold between reviews, and heterogeneity was high [29][32].
Thinking and memory
Shown to improve cognitive test scores in older adults with cognitive impairment and in young adults in two meta-analyses of small trials. Home-use devices showed no significant effect.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 11 RCTs in age-related cognitive impairment, photobiomodulation improved global cognition (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.162 to 0.864). The effect was significant in clinical settings (SMD 0.468) and not with home-use devices (SMD 0.616, 95% CI -0.121 to 1.354) [11]. In young healthy adults, transcranial light improved cognition-related outcomes (SMD 0.833, 95% CI 0.458 to 1.209, 14 comparisons from 6 publications) [12]. A systematic review found 29 of 35 human studies reported cognitive improvement, and noted that stroke trials were stopped at phase III for lack of statistical significance [13].
- Population
- Older adults with cognitive impairment in 11 RCTs [11]. Healthy adults aged 17 to 35 [12]. Healthy adults and people with cognitive disorders in 35 studies [13].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- In the young adult analysis, funnel plot tests indicated publication bias, heterogeneity was high and study quality was rated modest [12]. Only half of the clinical trials in the wider review were randomized [13]. Light was applied to the head, mostly near-infrared at 810 nm.
Anxiety, compared with placebo or no treatment pooled together
Shown to lower anxiety (SMD -0.82) in pooled trials that mixed placebo and no-treatment comparisons, with very high heterogeneity.
Compared with a placebo group or blank control, pooled together [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 13 studies, Reiki lowered anxiety (SMD -0.82, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.36), with heterogeneity of 88.5%. Effects were less consistent for anxiety before surgery and death-related anxiety in cancer patients [4].
- Population
- 824 adults in 13 studies, including people with chronic illness and healthy adults [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The review included quasi-experimental studies and did not separate sham Reiki from no treatment [4].
Depression
Linked to more new depression at both short and long sleep in one meta-analysis of seven cohorts.
Compared with people with normal sleep duration [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Short sleep was linked to a 31% higher risk of depression (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.64) and long sleep to a 42% higher risk (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.92), with no heterogeneity (I² 0%) [9]. A larger review found too little usable data to pool depression [3].
- Population
- 25,271 participants for short sleep and 23,663 for long sleep in 7 prospective studies [9].
- Sources
- [9], [3]
- Caveats
- Observational and few studies. Disturbed sleep is itself a symptom of depression, so early illness may change sleep before diagnosis, which is reverse causation.
Mood after sleep loss
Shown to lower positive mood and raise negative mood when sleep was cut or skipped, in one meta-analysis of 64 experimental studies.
Compared with control conditions the source does not describe [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Sleep loss had a large negative effect on positive mood (g -0.94) and a moderate effect raising negative mood (g 0.45). Total sleep deprivation raised negative mood more than partial restriction. Sleep restriction had a small negative effect on adaptive emotion regulation (g -0.32) [10].
- Population
- 241 effect sizes from 64 studies, from early childhood to late adulthood [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Short experimental studies of acute loss. They do not show what years of habitual short sleep do to mood. The emotion regulation studies were all in young people [10].
Attention and thinking
Shown to impair attention after total sleep loss in pooled experiments, and 14 nights of 6 hours or less in bed caused growing deficits in one trial.
Compared with a baseline test in the same people, or a control group [11]; 8 hours in bed a night [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Short-term total sleep deprivation had its largest effect on lapses in simple attention (g -0.776, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.60) and a small, nonsignificant effect on reasoning accuracy (g -0.125, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.02) [11]. Restricting time in bed to 4 or 6 hours for 14 days caused cumulative, dose-dependent deficits on all tasks, equal to up to 2 nights without sleep. Sleepiness ratings rose little after the first days, so people largely did not notice their growing deficits [12].
- Population
- 147 cognitive tests in 70 articles of under 48 hours of total sleep deprivation [11]. 48 healthy adults aged 21 to 38 in a laboratory [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Laboratory studies in healthy young adults. Total deprivation is more extreme than everyday short sleep. The restriction trial was small [12].
Total sleep time, Oura Ring
Shown to estimate total sleep time within 3 minutes of reference sleep studies on average across 6 pooled studies, with larger differences for individual nights.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Oura Ring, generations pooled [9]. Oura Ring Gen3 with Oura Sleep Staging Algorithm 2.0 [10]. Oura Ring Gen 3 [11]. The ŌURA ring as tested in a study first published in 2017 [12].
- Compared with
- Polysomnography. The meta-analysis also included studies that used actigraphy as the reference [9].
- Effect
- Across 6 studies, the ring did not differ significantly from the reference for total sleep time (mean difference -2.97 minutes, 95% CI -10.27 to 4.33), sleep efficiency (-1.32%, 95% CI -2.76 to 0.12) or wake after sleep onset (1.64 minutes, 95% CI -12.57 to 15.86) [9]. In 96 adults measured for up to three nights, the Gen3 ring did not differ from polysomnography for total sleep time and underestimated sleep efficiency by 1.1 to 1.5% [10]. In 41 adolescents and young adults, differences in total sleep time were within 30 minutes for 87.8% of the sample [12]. In 45 sleep clinic patients, the ring overestimated total sleep time by 11.7 minutes on average (SD 37.1), and individual differences ranged from -54.0 to 97.5 minutes [11].
- Population
- 388 participants in 6 studies [9]. 96 generally healthy Japanese adults aged 20 to 70 [10]. 41 healthy adolescents and young adults, mean age 17.2 [12]. 45 sleep clinic patients aged 23 to 74, with ring data for 31 nights [11].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [12], [11]
- Caveats
- The meta-analysis mixed polysomnography and actigraphy references [9]. In sleep clinic patients the ring overestimated more when true sleep time was lower [11]. A separate study in older adults found the 3rd generation ring underestimated total sleep time by 75.5 minutes [7].
Sleep and wake detection, finger-worn devices pooled
Shown to classify sleep versus wake with 87% pooled accuracy across finger-worn devices, mostly in healthy participants.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- 11 finger-worn devices pooled across 28 articles, including Oura Ring generations
- Compared with
- Polysomnography
- Effect
- Pooled accuracy for classifying sleep versus wake was 87% (95% CI 86 to 89%) [19].
- Population
- 28 articles published up to April 2025. Sleep staging studies enrolled primarily healthy participants [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- The authors describe heterogeneous sensors and algorithms across devices, and call for algorithmic transparency, more diverse populations and standardized methods [19].
Stress, against no breathing practice
Shown to lower self-rated stress by a small to moderate amount against inactive controls such as a waiting list, in one meta-analysis.
Compared with inactive non-breathwork controls [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 12 randomized trials, breathwork lowered self-rated stress against non-breathwork controls (g = -0.35, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.14). In the 7 trials with inactive controls, g = -0.37 (95% CI -0.73 to -0.02, I² 66%) [2]. A meta-analysis of heart rate variability biofeedback, which trains breathing at a slow resonant pace, found effects larger against inactive than active controls, and significant against both [3].
- Population
- 785 adults in 12 trials, nonclinical and clinical samples [2]. 58 randomized trials of heart rate variability biofeedback [3].
- Sources
- [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Most trials were at moderate risk of bias, and stress was self-reported by people who knew their group [2]. The biofeedback abstract gives no subgroup sizes [3].
Stress and mood, against an active comparison
Shown to lower self-rated stress slightly more than active control conditions. In one trial, 5 minutes a day of cyclic sighing lifted mood more than mindfulness meditation.
Compared with active non-breathwork controls [2]; mindfulness meditation for the same time [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In the 5 trials with active controls, breathwork lowered stress by g = -0.26 (95% CI -0.48 to -0.04, I² 0%) [2]. In a remote randomized trial of three 5-minute daily breathing exercises against 5 minutes of mindfulness meditation for a month, breathwork, especially exhale-focused cyclic sighing, produced a greater rise in positive mood (p < 0.05) and a greater fall in breathing rate (p < 0.05). State anxiety and negative mood fell in all groups and did not differ between breathwork and meditation [4].
- Population
- Participants in 5 trials [2]. 114 adults invited into a 1-month remote trial [4].
- Sources
- [2], [4]
- Caveats
- Five small trials [2]. The 1-month trial had no inactive control, participants completed about 18 to 20 of 28 days, and outcomes were self-rated [4].
Mood after quitting
Linked to small improvements in depression, anxiety and stress after quitting, in a Cochrane review of mostly cohort data rated very low to moderate in certainty.
Compared with people who continued to smoke [19]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against continuing to smoke, quitting was linked to lower anxiety (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.13), depression (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.21), mixed anxiety and depression (SMD -0.31) and stress (SMD -0.19), and more positive affect (SMD 0.22). New mixed anxiety and depression was less common in quitters (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86). Results were similar in people with mental illness [19].
- Population
- 102 studies with over 169,500 adults who smoked, followed at least 6 weeks [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- All studies were judged at serious risk of bias from confounding that changes over time, and there was some sign of publication bias [19]. People whose mood improves may find it easier to quit, which is reverse causation.
Social anxiety and panic disorder
Shown to reduce social anxiety and panic symptoms more than placebo in the venlafaxine trials behind its approval, five in social anxiety and two in panic disorder.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The evidence here is for venlafaxine extended release. In five placebo-controlled studies in social anxiety disorder, it lowered Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale scores more than placebo, by about 14 points in the 6-month study, with no added benefit at 150 to 225 mg over 75 mg. In two 12-week studies in panic disorder, more patients were free of full panic attacks and rated as responders than on placebo at each dose [10]. A Cochrane review found venlafaxine reduced social anxiety symptoms and had more treatment withdrawals than placebo (RR 3.23, 95% CI 2.15 to 4.86) [11]. In panic disorder, antidepressants as a group lowered the risk of not responding (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.79), and the finding held for each class [12].
- Population
- Adult outpatients in five social anxiety studies and two panic disorder studies [10]; 1,213 adults in 4 venlafaxine trials for the withdrawal outcome [11]; 8,252 adults with panic disorder in 41 RCTs [12].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [12]
- Caveats
- The label gives placebo-subtracted scores but no responder rates for social anxiety. Duloxetine and desvenlafaxine are not approved for either condition.
Depression
Linked to more depression with loneliness, a moderate effect in one meta-analysis of 88 studies and a positive link in all ten longitudinal studies of older adults in a review.
Compared with people with lower loneliness scores [8]; less lonely older adults [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Loneliness had a moderate, significant effect on depression across 88 studies, unchanged by sample, publication type or year [8]. All 10 longitudinal studies in older adults found loneliness linked to later depressive symptoms, with odds ratios from 0.41 to 17.76 [9].
- Population
- 40,068 people in 88 studies [8]. Older adults in 10 longitudinal studies [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Most of the larger review's studies measured both at one time, and its abstract gives no pooled size [8]. Depression also makes people withdraw and feel lonely, so the direction runs both ways. The longitudinal review did not pool its results [9].
Panic disorder
Shown to raise response in panic disorder in adults, with about 7 treated with an antidepressant for one extra response.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Antidepressants as a group lowered the risk of failing to respond against placebo (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.79), a number needed to treat of 7 (95% CI 6 to 9), and the same finding held when classes were compared with placebo. SSRIs produced more dropouts for adverse effects than placebo [10].
- Population
- 8,252 adults with panic disorder in the placebo-controlled arms of 41 RCTs [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The review rated the response evidence low quality. Some trials were funded by drug companies, and only short-term outcomes were assessed [10].
Social anxiety disorder
Shown to raise response in social anxiety disorder in adults, about 1.65 times as likely as on placebo, in evidence a Cochrane review rated very low quality.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Treatment response was more likely on an SSRI than placebo (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.48 to 1.85, 24 studies). SSRIs were the only class shown to reduce relapse and to reduce disability across several domains. Withdrawal from treatment was more frequent on SSRIs than placebo (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.97 to 3.39), with low absolute rates [11].
- Population
- 4,984 adults in 24 SSRI trials, within a review of 66 RCTs and 11,597 participants [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The response evidence was rated very low quality and the relapse evidence moderate quality [11].
PTSD
Shown to improve PTSD symptoms in adults, with 58% responding on an SSRI against 35% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- SSRIs lowered the risk of not responding against placebo (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.74), with PTSD symptoms improving in 58% on an SSRI and 35% on placebo. Withdrawal from treatment was more frequent on SSRIs (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.87), and 9% of people on SSRIs dropped out for adverse events [12].
- Population
- 1,078 adults in 8 SSRI trials for the response outcome, within a review of 66 RCTs and 7,442 participants lasting 13 days to 28 weeks [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Moderate-certainty evidence. Withdrawals were higher on paroxetine than placebo when that drug was analyzed alone (RR 1.55) [12].
Staying well after symptoms improve
Shown to lower relapse in people who had improved: about 22 fewer relapses per 100 on a continued SSRI than after a switch to placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 40 studies in depression, relapse was 20.9% on a continued antidepressant and 39.7% after a switch to placebo (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.43). For SSRIs the difference was 21.8 percentage points (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.38) [13]. In UK primary care, relapse by 52 weeks occurred in 39% of people who stayed on their antidepressant and 56% of those who tapered to placebo (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.70) [14]. In anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD, relapse was 16.4% on a continued antidepressant and 36.4% on placebo (OR for relapse after discontinuation 3.11, 95% CI 2.48 to 3.89) [15].
- Population
- 8,890 people with depression in remission in 40 studies [13]; 478 adults who felt well enough to stop, mean age 54 [14]; 5,233 responders in 28 studies followed up to one year [15].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- These trials enrolled only people who had already improved on the drug. The discontinuation group in [14] also reported more withdrawal symptoms, and adherence to the assigned arm was 70% and 52%. [15] has no data beyond one year. Antidepressant classes were pooled in [14] and [15].
Premenstrual syndrome and PMDD
Shown to reduce premenstrual symptoms in women with PMS or PMDD by a moderate amount, more with daily dosing than with dosing in the luteal phase only.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- SSRIs lowered overall self-rated premenstrual symptoms against placebo (SMD -0.57, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.42). The effect was larger with continuous dosing (SMD -0.69) than with luteal phase dosing (SMD -0.39). Nausea (OR 3.30), insomnia (OR 1.99) and sexual dysfunction or decreased libido (OR 2.32) were more frequent than on placebo [16]. The 2013 version of the same review reported numbers needed to harm of 7 for nausea and 14 for decreased libido at moderate doses [17].
- Population
- 1,742 women in 12 studies for the symptom outcome, within 34 RCTs of fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, escitalopram and citalopram [16]; 31 RCTs [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Both sources are versions of one Cochrane review. 68% of the included studies were funded by drug companies, and the authors suspected publication bias in the response analysis [16].
Bulimia nervosa
Shown to raise remission from binge eating in bulimia nervosa across antidepressants, with about 9 treated for one extra remission. The SSRI trials were all of fluoxetine.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across antidepressant classes, the risk of not reaching remission from binge episodes was lower than on placebo (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.93), a number needed to treat of 9 (95% CI 6 to 16) over a mean 8 weeks. A 50% or greater drop in binge episodes was also more likely (RR for no improvement 0.63, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.74), a number needed to treat of 4. Fewer people dropped out on fluoxetine than on placebo [21].
- Population
- People with bulimia nervosa in 16 placebo-controlled trials, 3 of them of fluoxetine [21].
- Sources
- [21]
- Caveats
- The evidence within this class is for fluoxetine only, and the pooled numbers include tricyclics and MAOIs. The review dates from 2003, and 92% of the placebo group did not reach remission [21].
Premenstrual symptoms
Shown to lower PMS anxiety, depression, mood and behavioral symptoms modestly against placebo. One small trial found physical and behavioral gains but no mood change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 9 RCTs, St. John's wort lowered PMS anxiety (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.05), depression (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.17), mood disturbance (SMD -0.36, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.06) and behavioral symptoms (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.19) against placebo [4]. In a crossover trial of 36 women with mild PMS, 900 mg a day for two cycles improved physical and behavioral symptoms more than placebo. Mood and pain symptoms, anxiety, depression, hormones and cytokines did not differ [5].
- Population
- 1,020 participants in 9 RCTs published from 2000 to 2023 [4]. 36 women aged 18 to 45 [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis, which searched Iranian regional databases alongside international ones. The authors note a lack of high-quality evidence for some outcomes [4]. The single crossover trial found no mood difference, unlike the pooled result [5].
Stress, anxiety and depression
Shown to lower stress, anxiety and depression in pooled trials of tai chi and of qigong, against waiting list and varied controls, in trials with methodological limits.
Compared with varied control groups, including some nonrandomized studies [12]; waiting list [13]; lectures and structured movement alone [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Tai chi reduced stress (effect size 0.66, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.09), anxiety (0.66, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.03) and depression (0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.80) and improved mood (0.45) [12]. In healthy adults, 1 to 3 months of qigong lowered anxiety (SMD -0.75, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.40, 4 trials) and stress (SMD -0.88, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.55, 3 trials) against waiting list [13].
- Population
- 3,817 participants in 40 studies, healthy and with chronic conditions [12]. Healthy adults in 7 trials [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- The tai chi review pooled randomized and nonrandomized trials and noted inadequate controls [12]. The qigong review had few trials with methodological flaws [13].
Insomnia, against no program or sleep education
Shown in two trials of older adults with insomnia to improve sleep against no intervention or sleep education, by modest amounts on wrist-worn sleep measures.
Compared with no intervention [14]; a sleep seminar education control [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After 12 weeks, sleep efficiency rose 3.4% (95% CI 1.6 to 5.1), wake time after sleep onset fell 13.3 minutes and awakenings fell by 2.2 against no intervention, measured by actigraphy and maintained at 24 months [14]. Against a sleep seminar, Tai Chi Chih improved self-rated sleep quality, fatigue and depressive symptoms, but not insomnia remission, and polysomnography did not change [15].
- Population
- 320 adults aged 60 and over with chronic insomnia in Hong Kong, 80% women [14]. 123 older adults with chronic insomnia in Los Angeles [15].
- Sources
- [14], [15]
- Caveats
- The authors describe the absolute improvements as modest [14].
Heart attack, stroke and death
Shown to lower stroke from 6.2% to 4.2%, coronary heart disease from 3.9% to 2.8% and deaths from 11.0% to 9.8% as first-line low-dose treatment.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review found first-line low-dose thiazides lowered mortality (11.0% with control against 9.8%, RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97), total cardiovascular events (12.9% against 9.0%, RR 0.70), stroke (6.2% against 4.2%, RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.77) and coronary heart disease (3.9% against 2.8%, RR 0.72). High-dose thiazides lowered stroke (RR 0.47) and total cardiovascular events (RR 0.72) and did not lower mortality [4]. In the SHEP trial of chlorthalidone-based treatment, the 5-year incidence of stroke was 5.2 per 100 on treatment and 8.2 on placebo (RR 0.64), with major cardiovascular events also lower (RR 0.68) [5]. In ALLHAT, chlorthalidone did not differ from amlodipine or lisinopril on fatal coronary disease or nonfatal heart attack, and had a lower 6-year rate of heart failure than either (7.7% against 10.2% and 8.7%) [6].
- Population
- 58,040 people in 24 trials across drug classes, mean age 56, followed 3 to 5 years [4]; 4,736 adults aged 60 and over with isolated systolic hypertension, mean age 72 [5]; 33,357 adults aged 55 or older in ALLHAT [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane authors rated the low-dose evidence high quality and the high-dose evidence low to moderate [4]. The two named trials used chlorthalidone.
Stress and cortisol
Shown to lower salivary cortisol slightly in forest groups in one meta-analysis, and serum cortisol fell after forest visits in two small trials in men.
Compared with urban groups [1]; people with lower greenspace exposure [2]; the group sent to a city area [3]; the day before forest therapy, in the same men [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Salivary cortisol was lower in forest groups than urban groups after the intervention (MD -0.05 μg/dL, 95% CI -0.06 to -0.04, I² 88%), and also before it (MD -0.08 μg/dL). In all but two of 22 studies, cortisol was lower after forest time than in comparison groups or than before [1]. Across observational and intervention studies, greenspace exposure was linked to lower salivary cortisol (-0.05, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.04) [2]. After a two-night forest trip, serum cortisol was lower than in a group sent to a city, as were interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha [3]. In middle-aged men with high-normal blood pressure, serum cortisol and urinary adrenaline were lower after forest therapy than the day before [4].
- Population
- 22 studies, 8 pooled [1]. 103 observational and 40 interventional studies [2]. 20 healthy male university students, randomized [3]. Middle-aged men with high-normal blood pressure [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The forest groups' cortisol was already lower before the visit, which the reviewers tie to anticipation and placebo effects [1]. Studies were short, small and mostly in Japan, and nobody can be blinded to a forest. The serum trials studied only men [3][4].
Blue spaces: coasts, lakes and rivers
Linked to more physical activity and restoration with more blue space nearby or more contact with it, in one meta-analysis. Living closer was not linked to restoration.
Compared with people living farther from, with less, or with less contact with blue space [13]; comparisons the source does not describe [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Living closer to blue space was linked to more physical activity (Cohen's d 0.122). More contact with blue space was linked to more restoration (d 0.191, 95% CI 0.084 to 0.298). Shorter distance was not linked to restoration (d 0.123, 95% CI -0.037 to 0.284) or social interaction [13]. A review of 33 therapeutic blue space programs found mostly positive or weak links with mental health and wellbeing, and very few findings on physical health [14].
- Population
- 50 studies [13]. 33 intervention studies in people with a defined need [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Mostly observational. The program review gave no pooled estimates [14]. Effects are small.
Chronic migraine
Shown to cut monthly migraine days modestly against placebo in chronic migraine, with the most dropouts for side effects among the treatments compared.
Compared with placebo, botulinum toxin and acupuncture [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis, topiramate lowered monthly migraine days more than placebo (SMD -0.4, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.04) and did not differ significantly from botulinum toxin. It caused the most treatment-related adverse events and the highest rate of dropouts for adverse events [4].
- Population
- 2,545 people in 15 trials, 582 in the topiramate comparisons [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- One network meta-analysis, with few direct comparisons between treatments [4].
Drug-resistant focal epilepsy, added to other seizure drugs
Shown to make a halving of seizures about 2.7 times as likely as placebo when added to other drugs, with more effect at higher doses and more withdrawals.
Compared with placebo added to existing seizure drugs [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 50% or greater fall in seizure frequency was more likely on add-on topiramate than placebo (RR 2.71, 95% CI 2.05 to 3.59), and the odds rose 1.45 times per 200 mg a day increase. Seizure freedom was more likely (RR 3.67, 95% CI 1.79 to 7.54), and so was stopping treatment (RR 2.37, 95% CI 1.66 to 3.37) [6].
- Population
- 1,650 participants in 12 trials with 11 to 19 weeks of double-blind treatment [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- The review found evidence of publication bias for the main outcome [6].
Binge eating disorder
Shown to reduce binge episodes by about 1.3 a week and weight by about 4.9 kg against placebo in binge eating disorder, with more withdrawals for safety reasons.
Compared with placebo, with or without psychotherapy [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Topiramate lowered binge episodes per week (MD -1.31, 95% CI -2.58 to -0.03), binge days per week (MD -0.98, 95% CI -1.80 to -0.16) and weight (MD -4.91 kg, 95% CI -6.42 to -3.41). Withdrawals for safety reasons were more frequent (RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.18) [9].
- Population
- 528 people with binge eating disorder in 3 trials [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Only three trials, with very high heterogeneity for binge outcomes (I² 94%) [9].
Drinking in alcohol use disorder
Shown to lower total alcohol consumption against placebo in adults with alcohol dependence, with no trial powered to show health benefits.
Compared with placebo, and indirectly nalmefene, naltrexone and acamprosate [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Topiramate reduced total alcohol consumption against placebo (SMD -0.77, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.42, I² 0%). Indirect comparisons suggested larger effects than nalmefene, naltrexone and acamprosate. No treatment showed harm reduction [10].
- Population
- 6,036 adults with alcohol dependence or alcohol use disorder who were still drinking, in 32 trials across five drugs [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- 81% of the trials had a risk of incomplete outcome data, and none was powered for health outcomes [10].
Depression in adults
Shown to reduce depression symptoms more than placebo in adults. Response matched SSRIs in one meta-analysis and ranked among the lower rates in another.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of 522 trials, every antidepressant studied, trazodone among them, had a higher response rate than placebo, with odds ratios from 1.37 to 2.13. In head-to-head trials, trazodone was among the drugs with lower response rates (odds ratios 0.51 to 0.84) and among those with the most dropouts [1]. In a meta-analysis of trials against SSRIs, response was 61.1% on trazodone or the related drug nefazodone and 61.7% on SSRIs (RR 1.002, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.17), with no difference in discontinuation [2]. In a six-week trial of an extended-release form, Hamilton depression scores fell 11.4 points on trazodone and 9.3 on placebo [3]. In a trial against venlafaxine and placebo, both drugs beat placebo on some measures, and trazodone did more for sleep disturbance [4].
- Population
- 116,477 adults in 522 trials [1]; adults in trials comparing trazodone or nefazodone with SSRIs [2]; adults with major depressive disorder in a six-week trial [3]; 225 adults with major depression, 149 completing six weeks [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- [2] pooled trazodone with nefazodone and does not report trazodone alone. The two meta-analyses differ on how trazodone compares with other antidepressants. Trials lasted weeks.
Injected sumatriptan for migraine
Shown to leave 59% pain free 2 hours after a 6 mg sumatriptan injection against 15% on placebo, a larger effect than by mouth.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- A 6 mg injection under the skin left 59% pain free at 2 hours against 15% on placebo, a number needed to treat of 2.3 (95% CI 2.1 to 2.4) in 2,522 participants, and acted faster than other routes [1]. Numbers needed to treat were 2.9 for pain freedom at 1 hour, 2.1 for headache relief at 2 hours and 6.1 for sustained pain freedom at 24 hours. A second injection after a poor response to the first gave no added relief [5].
- Population
- 9,365 participants in 35 studies of injected sumatriptan [5].
- Sources
- [1], [5]
- Caveats
- Adverse events were more frequent with the injection than with other routes [1].
Compared with NSAIDs, acetaminophen and newer migraine drugs
Shown to match or exceed NSAIDs, aspirin and acetaminophen for headache relief at 2 hours, and to outperform lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant in a network analysis.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Standard-dose triptans relieved headache within 2 hours in 42% to 76% of patients, against 46% to 52% for NSAIDs, aspirin and acetaminophen and 38% for ergots [6]. In a network of 137 trials, eletriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan were each more likely to give pain freedom at 2 hours than lasmiditan, rimegepant or ubrogepant. For sustained pain freedom to 24 hours, eletriptan and ibuprofen ranked highest [4]. Paracetamol 1,000 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg did not differ significantly from oral sumatriptan 100 mg for headache relief at 2 hours [7].
- Population
- 133 randomized trials [6]; 89,445 participants in 137 trials [4]; 2,942 participants in 11 studies of paracetamol [7].
- Sources
- [6], [4], [7]
- Caveats
- Mostly indirect comparisons across trials with different patients and placebo rates.
Sumatriptan taken with naproxen
Shown to leave 28% pain free at 2 hours on sumatriptan plus naproxen against 8% on placebo, more than either drug alone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- When starting pain was moderate or severe, sumatriptan 85 mg or 50 mg plus naproxen 500 mg left 28% pain free at 2 hours against 8% on placebo (number needed to treat 4.9, 95% CI 4.3 to 5.7). When starting pain was mild the figures were 50% and 18% (3.1, 95% CI 2.9 to 3.5). Where trials compared directly, the combination did better than sumatriptan alone or naproxen alone, and adverse events were less frequent on naproxen than on sumatriptan [8].
- Population
- 13 studies, with 3,663 participants given the combination, 3,682 placebo, 964 sumatriptan and 982 naproxen [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Adverse events were more frequent on the combination than on placebo and rarely led to withdrawal [8].
Cluster headache attacks
Shown to leave 48% pain free 15 minutes after a 6 mg sumatriptan injection for a cluster headache attack, against 17% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Fifteen minutes after sumatriptan 6 mg under the skin, 48% were pain free and 75% had no or mild pain, against 17% and 32% on placebo (numbers needed to treat 3.3 and 2.4). Zolmitriptan 10 mg by nasal spray left 12% pain free and 28% with no or mild pain, against 3% and 7% on placebo (11 and 4.9) [9].
- Population
- 6 studies of single attacks, with 219 participants given injected sumatriptan, 454 given zolmitriptan and 326 given placebo [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Six small studies, each treating one attack.
Migraine in children and adolescents
Shown to raise pain freedom in adolescents with migraine, with 6 treated for one extra pain free, and 13 in younger children.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Triptans as a class raised pain freedom against placebo in adolescents (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.47, number needed to treat 6) across 21 studies, and in children (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.62, number needed to treat 13) across 3 studies. Minor adverse events were more frequent in adolescents on triptans (risk difference 0.13, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.18) [10].
- Population
- 7,026 adolescents in 21 studies and 273 children in 3 studies, from 27 trials with mean ages of 8.2 to 14.7 years [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The reviewers rated the evidence moderate quality. The sumatriptan tablet label covers adults only [11].
Preventing menstrual migraine
Shown to raise the share of women free of menstrual migraine when frovatriptan was taken around the period, with about 4 to 7 treated for one extra.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Taken for 5 to 6 days starting 2 to 3 days before the expected headache, frovatriptan 2.5 mg once a day raised the chance of a period free of menstrual migraine against placebo (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.72, number needed to treat 7.22), and twice a day more so (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.09, number needed to treat 3.90). Numbers needed to treat for zolmitriptan 2.5 mg were 4.98 twice a day and 2.52 three times a day [12].
- Population
- Women with menstrual migraine in 6 randomized trials: 1,217 given frovatriptan, 462 naratriptan, 163 zolmitriptan and 1,104 placebo [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- All participants were women, with mean ages of 36 to 38. No trial compared one triptan with another [12]. The sumatriptan label states it is not indicated for preventing migraine [11].
Depression and anxiety symptoms
Shown to lower depression scores against placebo in people with depression or depressive symptoms, with effect sizes varying widely across reviews.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 10 trials (594 patients), curcumin lowered depression scores (SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.13, I² 15%) and raised response rates (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.28 to 7.99). In people with diagnosed depression the SMD was -0.35, and in people with depressive symptoms it was -0.17 (95% CI -0.61 to 0.26) [25]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 19 RCTs found lower scores in people with depression (SMD -0.76, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.30, 8 studies) and in people with depressive symptoms (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.09, 11 studies) [26]. Another, of 26 RCTs (1,491 participants), reported larger drops in depression (SMD -1.53, 95% CI -2.05 to -1.02), anxiety (SMD -1.67) and stress (SMD -1.71) against placebo [27]. In 15 RCTs (1,123 adults with chronic diseases), depressive symptoms (SMD -0.65) and anxiety (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.05, I² 0%) fell [28].
- Population
- Patients with depression or depressive symptoms [25][26]; adults with depression, anxiety or stress symptoms [27]; adults with type 2 diabetes, obesity, arthritis and other chronic diseases [28].
- Sources
- [25], [26], [27], [28]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality was rated low [25]. Pooled depression effects ranged from SMD -0.32 to -1.53 across reviews [25][27]. Heterogeneity reached 94.5% and the effect was fragile in sensitivity analysis [26]. Certainty was moderate to low [27].
Self-reported sleep improvement
Shown to raise the share of people reporting better sleep, about 37% more than placebo, in adults with or without sleep problems. Most studies had method problems.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 18 RCTs, the share of people reporting improved sleep was higher with valerian than placebo (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.78) [1]. An earlier meta-analysis of 16 studies (1,093 patients) found a similar result (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.9) with evidence of publication bias [2]. A 2020 meta-analysis of 10 studies (1,065 participants) on subjective sleep quality linked inconsistent results across trials to variable extract quality [3].
- Population
- Healthy adults and people with sleep disturbance or insomnia [1][2][3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Doses, preparations and durations varied widely, and most studies had methodological problems [2]. These are yes-or-no or self-rated outcomes.
Premenstrual syndrome
Shown to improve overall premenstrual symptoms and premenstrual depression over placebo in women with PMS, in mostly low-quality trials from a 1999 review.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 9 trials, women on vitamin B6 were more likely than on placebo to report better overall premenstrual symptoms (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.95 to 2.54) and better premenstrual depression (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.06, 4 trials) [4].
- Population
- 940 women with premenstrual syndrome in 9 published trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The authors rated most trials low quality. Doses ran up to 100 mg a day [4]. The review is from 1999.
Depressive symptoms in people with depression
Shown to lower depressive symptom scores in adults with depression, in small trials with high heterogeneity.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 15 RCTs (962 participants diagnosed with depression), vitamin D lowered depressive symptom scores against placebo (SMD -0.98, 95% CI -1.28 to -0.68, I² 79%). The largest reductions were at daily doses up to 5,000 IU [26]. A Bayesian review of 7 studies found an SMD of -0.88 (95% credible interval -1.38 to -0.35) for vitamin D-containing supplements, with prediction intervals that crossed no effect [27].
- Population
- Adults with depressive disorders or clinically relevant depressive symptoms in randomized trials [26][27].
- Sources
- [26], [27]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was high in both reviews [26][27]. The Bayesian review also counted regimens that added other nutrients, so the two reviews do not answer exactly the same question [27]. The trials were small.
Memory and thinking in older volunteers
Linked to better memory and verbal fluency in older volunteers in 16 of 17 studies in one review. One large US cohort found no link with cognitive impairment.
Compared with older adults who did not volunteer [5]; retired seniors who did not volunteer or volunteered only on and off [6]; people who volunteered 0 hours a year [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Sixteen of 17 longitudinal studies and trials found a positive link between volunteering and cognition, with better episodic memory, working memory and verbal fluency [5]. Seniors who volunteered continuously reported fewer cognitive complaints over time and were about 2.4 times less likely to be prescribed an anti-dementia drug [6]. In a 4-year US cohort, volunteering was not linked to cognitive impairment [4].
- Population
- 17 studies, mostly in high-income countries [5]. 1,001 retired Swedish seniors over 5 years [6]. 12,998 US adults over 50 [4].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [4]
- Caveats
- Observational for the most part. Early cognitive decline makes people stop volunteering, which is reverse causation. Drug prescriptions are an indirect measure of dementia [6].
Purpose in life and dementia
Linked to 23% less dementia in people with a stronger sense of purpose in life, in one meta-analysis of six samples followed up to 17 years.
Compared with people with a lower sense of purpose in life [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Greater purpose was linked to lower dementia risk (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.81). The link held after adjusting for depression and physical inactivity and did not differ by age, gender or education [12].
- Population
- 53,499 people with 5,862 new dementia cases in 6 samples [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Observational. Dementia changes motivation for years before diagnosis, so low purpose may be an early sign rather than a cause.
Depression symptoms
Shown to lower depression scores when added to usual treatment in people with mental health problems, in a meta-analysis of small studies with high heterogeneity.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 10 studies (294 participants receiving cryotherapy), the between-group effect on mental health problems was medium (Hedges' g 0.76, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.36). The within-group effect for depressive symptoms was very large (g 2.95, 95% CI 2.44 to 3.45) and for quality of life medium (g 0.70, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.24) [7]. In a sham-controlled trial of 10 sessions added to antidepressant medication, Hamilton depression scores improved more with cryogenic temperatures than with -50°C (group by time interaction p = 0.02), as did quality of life and self-rated mood. Sexual satisfaction, vitality and sleep did not change [8].
- Population
- 10 studies, 6 of them controlled trials [7]. 92 adults with a depressive episode on medication, of whom 56 completed the study [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity in the pooled within-group estimate was 93%, and the reviewers added an allegiance bias rating because of who ran the studies [7]. Within-group effects include placebo response and natural recovery. Only 56 of 92 enrolled participants finished the sham-controlled trial [8].
Anxiety, against no treatment
Shown to ease anxiety slightly against no treatment in one meta-analysis of 8 small trials, in people with raised anxiety. No effect appeared in diagnosed anxiety disorders.
Compared with no treatment [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against no treatment, anxiety fell in the short term (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.11) and depression fell (SMD -0.35, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.04). No effects were found for people with anxiety disorders diagnosed by DSM criteria, only for those diagnosed by other methods and those with elevated anxiety without a formal diagnosis [4].
- Population
- 319 participants, mean age 30 to 38.5, in 8 trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Few small trials with unclear risk of selection bias [4].
Anxiety, against active comparisons
Shown to ease anxiety more than active comparisons in small pooled trials. In one trial of generalized anxiety disorder, Kundalini yoga beat stress education but fell short of CBT.
Compared with active comparators the source abstract does not describe [4]; stress education [5]; cognitive behavioral therapy [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against active comparators, anxiety fell more with yoga (SMD -0.86, 95% CI -1.56 to -0.15) [4]. In 226 adults with generalized anxiety disorder, 54.2% responded to Kundalini yoga against 33.0% to stress education (odds ratio 2.46, 95% CI 1.12 to 5.42, number needed to treat 4.59) and 70.8% to CBT. Yoga did not meet the noninferiority test against CBT [5].
- Population
- Participants in the active-comparison trials of 8 [4]. 226 adults with a primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder, mean age 33, 70% women [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The pooled active comparison rests on few trials with a wide interval [4]. Only 68.6% completed the post-treatment assessment in the anxiety disorder trial [5].
Sleep quality in older adults
Shown to improve self-rated sleep quality in older adults against inactive controls such as a waiting list, in one meta-analysis.
Compared with inactive controls such as a waiting list or education booklets [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against inactive controls, sleep quality improved (effect size 0.65), along with vitality (0.31) and perceived mental and physical health. Against active controls, only depression improved significantly among quality of life outcomes [7].
- Population
- Older adults in 20 trials of quality of life outcomes [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Sleep was self-rated.
Depression
Linked to depression: blood zinc was about 1.85 µmol/L (12 µg/dL) lower in depressed people than in controls across 17 pooled studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis, peripheral blood zinc was 1.85 µmol/L lower in depressed than in control subjects (95% CI -2.51 to -1.19), about 12 µg/dL. The gap was larger in studies of inpatients (-2.54 µmol/L) than in community samples (-0.94 µmol/L), and greater depression severity went with a larger gap [7].
- Population
- 1,643 depressed and 804 control subjects in 17 studies [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Comparisons of people with and without depression at one point in time, so they cannot show which came first. Results differed widely between studies (I² 88%) [7]. The µg/dL figure is converted here.
Self-rated sleep quality
Shown to improve self-rated sleep quality over placebo in short trials of eszopiclone and zolpidem, by more than zaleplon, melatonin or ramelteon.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of acute treatment, benzodiazepines, doxylamine, eszopiclone, lemborexant, seltorexant, zolpidem and zopiclone each improved self-rated sleep quality more than placebo (SMD range 0.36 to 0.83, certainty high to moderate). Benzodiazepines, eszopiclone, zolpidem and zopiclone improved it more than melatonin, ramelteon and zaleplon (SMD 0.27 to 0.71, certainty moderate to very low). Zolpidem caused more dropouts due to adverse events than placebo (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.50) [8]. One month of zolpidem improved sleep quality against placebo in a second meta-analysis [2]. In people aged 60 and over, sedative hypnotics of all kinds improved sleep quality with an effect size of 0.14 [5].
- Population
- 44,089 adults with insomnia disorder in 154 double-blind trials of 30 interventions [8]; 1,068 patients in 6 trials [2]; 2,417 participants aged 60 or over in 24 studies [5].
- Sources
- [8], [2], [5]
- Caveats
- The SMD ranges cover several drug classes, and the abstract does not give the figure for each Z-drug. Data on zaleplon were described as scarce [8]. The effect in older adults was small [5].
Insomnia treated for six months or longer
Shown to keep improving sleep against placebo across 6 to 8 months of use in four trials of eszopiclone and zolpidem in adults with chronic insomnia.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Over 6 months of nightly eszopiclone 3 mg, sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset, total sleep time and sleep quality all stayed better than placebo at every month (P 0.003 or lower), with no evidence of tolerance [9]. In a second 6-month trial, Insomnia Severity Index scores fell below clinically meaningful levels in 50% on eszopiclone and 19% on placebo [10]. Extended-release zolpidem 12.5 mg taken 3 to 7 nights a week was rated as helping sleep by 89.8% at week 12 against 51.4% on placebo, and by 92.3% against 59.7% at week 24 [11]. Over 8 months of nightly zolpidem, total sleep time and sleep efficiency rose and sleep latency and wake after sleep onset fell against placebo on sleep-lab recordings at months 1 and 8 [12]. In a network meta-analysis of long-term treatment, eszopiclone improved sleep quality more than placebo (SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.90) and more than zolpidem (SMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.20), both rated very low certainty [8].
- Population
- 788 adults aged 21 to 69 with primary insomnia, 593 on eszopiclone [9]; 830 adults with primary insomnia [10]; 1,018 adults aged 18 to 64, 669 on zolpidem [11]; 91 adults aged 23 to 70 with primary insomnia [12]; long-term trials within 154 pooled trials [8].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11], [12], [8]
- Caveats
- In the 8-month trial, self-rated sleep did not differ between zolpidem and placebo [12]. In the 6-month eszopiclone trial, 12.8% on the drug and 7.2% on placebo left because of an adverse reaction [7]. The zolpidem label describes its supporting trials as 4 to 5 weeks long and its approved use as short-term [13].
Obsessive-compulsive disorder alongside fluoxetine
One trial found adding 5-HTP to fluoxetine for 12 weeks lowered OCD symptoms more than fluoxetine plus placebo in 60 adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 60 patients with moderate to severe OCD, adding 5-HTP 100 mg twice daily to fluoxetine for 12 weeks gave larger Y-BOCS reductions and higher partial and complete response rates than fluoxetine plus placebo [5].
- Population
- 60 adults with OCD [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- One trial. The abstract does not report adverse events [5].
Sleep
Small trials found 5-HTP improved sleep scores in older adults who slept poorly, raised REM sleep in Parkinson's disease, and cut sleep terrors in children.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 30 older adults given 100 mg a day or nothing for 12 weeks, poor sleepers on 5-HTP improved their Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global score by 2.80 points (p = 0.005), while good sleepers did not change [11]. In 18 people with Parkinson's disease and REM sleep behavior disorder, 50 mg a day for 4 weeks raised the share of REM sleep over placebo, with no rise in episodes and a non-significant fall in arousals and waking after sleep onset [12]. In 45 children with sleep terrors, 29 of 31 (93.5%) given 2 mg/kg at bedtime for 20 days responded at 1 month, against 4 of 14 (28.6%) untreated, and 26 of 31 (83.9%) were free of sleep terrors at 6 months [13].
- Population
- 30 older adults in Singapore, mean age 66 [11]. 18 adults with Parkinson's disease [12]. 45 children aged 3 to 10 [13].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- The older adult trial was single-blinded with an untreated control, not placebo, and the benefit appeared only in the poor sleeper subgroup [11]. The Parkinson's trial was small and short [12]. The sleep terror trial was open label with no placebo [13]. No trial in adults with insomnia was located.
Migraine prevention
One small crossover trial found lisinopril lowered days with migraine by 21% against placebo in adults with 2 to 6 attacks a month.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Over 12-week periods, lisinopril lowered hours with headache by 20% (95% CI 5 to 36), days with headache by 17% (95% CI 5 to 30) and days with migraine by 21% (95% CI 9 to 34) against placebo. Days with migraine fell by at least half in 14 of the 47 participants with complete data [17].
- Population
- 60 adults aged 19 to 59 with 2 to 6 migraine episodes a month, 47 with complete data [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- One small trial from one clinic, of lisinopril only. Not an FDA-approved use [3].
Depression
Limited evidence: low-quality trials found a small drop in depression scores, 1.69 points on the Hamilton scale, against sham acupuncture, and a moderate drop against no treatment.
Compared with no treatment, waiting list or treatment as usual [16]; sham acupuncture [16]; antidepressant medication [16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against no treatment, waiting list or usual care, depression severity fell (SMD -0.66, 95% CI -1.06 to -0.25, 5 trials, 488 participants). Against sham, it fell by 1.69 points on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (95% CI -3.33 to -0.05, 14 trials, 841 participants). Against medication, the difference was small (SMD -0.23, 31 trials, 3,127 participants), at very low quality [16].
- Population
- 64 trials with 7,104 people with depression [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- Most trials were at high risk of performance bias, and evidence was rated low to very low in quality [16].
Narcolepsy
One small trial found sleepiness scores improved 4.4 points on amphetamine-dextroamphetamine and 5.0 on modafinil, without showing the two were equivalent.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Methylphenidate and immediate-release mixed amphetamine salts carry narcolepsy as a labeled use [10][11]. In a 12-week blinded trial, Epworth sleepiness scores improved by 4.4 points on amphetamine-dextroamphetamine and 5.0 on modafinil. Noninferiority was not demonstrated on that primary outcome and was demonstrated on secondary measures of severity, sleepiness and sleep inertia. Dropouts for adverse events were 9.1% on amphetamine-dextroamphetamine and 31.8% on modafinil [12].
- Population
- 44 adults with narcolepsy type 2 or idiopathic hypersomnia [12].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [12]
- Caveats
- One small trial with no placebo group, in narcolepsy type 2 and a related condition. The evidence is for amphetamine-dextroamphetamine. No recent placebo-controlled trial of a stimulant in narcolepsy was located.
Parkinson disease
Limited evidence: two cohort studies linked terazosin, doxazosin or alfuzosin to lower Parkinson risk or fewer Parkinson events than tamsulosin, in men. No trial has tested this.
Compared with men taking tamsulosin [17][18]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Men starting terazosin, doxazosin or alfuzosin had a lower hazard of developing Parkinson disease than matched men starting tamsulosin, HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.98) in Danish registries and 0.63 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.69) in US claims, lower with longer use [17]. Among veterans already treated for Parkinson disease, Parkinson-related events were less frequent on these drugs than on tamsulosin (adjusted IRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.88) [18].
- Population
- 52,365 and 94,883 matched pairs of men [17]; 24,539 veterans with Parkinson disease taking an alpha-blocker [18].
- Sources
- [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational, and both studies compared against tamsulosin users rather than men taking no alpha-blocker. The idea rests on these drugs boosting a glycolysis enzyme, which tamsulosin does not.
Cognition in dementia and mild cognitive impairment
Limited evidence: citicoline and choline alfoscerate improved cognitive scores in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, in studies of poor quality with risk of bias.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 6 pooled studies, citicoline improved cognitive status with SMDs of 0.56 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.75) to 1.57 (95% CI 0.77 to 2.37) depending on the sensitivity analysis [1]. In 261 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, choline alfoscerate 400 mg three times a day for 180 days lowered ADAS-Cog by 3.20 points from baseline while placebo rose by 2.90 points [2]. In 3 head-to-head trials (358 participants), choline alfoscerate scored better than citicoline on a geriatric clinical scale (WMD -3.92, 95% CI -7.41 to -0.42), with no difference in memory or word fluency [3].
- Population
- Mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease and post-stroke dementia [1]; Alzheimer's disease, aged 60 to 80 [2]; dementia disorders [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Study quality in [1] was poor, with significant risk of bias in favor of the intervention. The head-to-head review compares two choline compounds and has no placebo arm [3].
Memory and attention in healthy adults
Small trials found citicoline raised a memory score in older adults with memory impairment, and alpha-GPC raised one attention score in young men.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 100 adults aged 50 to 85 with age-associated memory impairment, citicoline 500 mg a day for 12 weeks raised a composite memory score by 3.78 versus 0.72 on placebo, a secondary outcome [7]. In 20 resistance-trained men, single doses of 315 mg and 630 mg alpha-GPC raised Stroop scores over placebo (13.0 versus 5.2 at the higher dose). Flanker and N-back tests did not differ [8].
- Population
- Healthy older adults [7]; young men [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The memory gains in [7] were secondary outcomes, using a branded product (Cognizin). The alpha-GPC trial was funded by the ingredient maker and retrospectively registered [8].
Stroke in high blood pressure with an enlarged left ventricle
One trial found losartan lowered stroke by 25% against atenolol in adults with high blood pressure and an enlarged left ventricle, at similar blood pressure.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over at least 4 years, the composite of death, heart attack or stroke occurred at 23.8 per 1,000 patient-years on losartan and 27.9 on atenolol (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98). Stroke occurred in 232 people on losartan and 309 on atenolol (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.89). Heart attack did not differ (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.31). Blood pressure fell by 30.2/16.6 mm Hg on losartan and 29.1/16.8 mm Hg on atenolol [9].
- Population
- 9,193 adults aged 55 to 80 with high blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy on ECG [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- The comparison was atenolol, not placebo. The losartan label states there is evidence this benefit does not apply to Black patients [10].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 9,193 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Migraine prevention
Small trials found candesartan lowered migraine days against placebo, with about 40% of people having at least half as many.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Over 12 weeks, days with headache were 13.6 on candesartan 16 mg and 18.5 on placebo, and days with migraine 9.0 against 12.6. Migraine days fell by at least half in 23 of 57 people (40.4%) [21]. In a second crossover trial, migraine days per 4 weeks were 2.95 on candesartan, 2.91 on propranolol and 3.53 on placebo. The share with at least a 50% reduction was 43% on candesartan, 40% on propranolol and 23% on placebo [22].
- Population
- 60 adults with 2 to 6 migraine attacks a month, 57 analyzed [21]; 72 adults with episodic or chronic migraine [22].
- Sources
- [21], [22]
- Caveats
- Two small crossover trials from the same Norwegian group, both of candesartan. Not an FDA-approved use.
ADHD in adults, viloxazine
One trial found viloxazine lowered adult ADHD symptoms 3.7 points more than placebo over 6 weeks.
Compared with placebo [6]
Focus and self-control in healthy adults
Small trials found a single dose of atomoxetine improved stopping a started action in healthy volunteers, mostly in those who did worst on placebo, with no effect on learning.
Compared with placebo, in crossover designs [7][8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In healthy volunteers, atomoxetine improved response inhibition on a stop-signal task but had no effect on probabilistic learning [7]. In a later crossover trial, a single 40 mg dose sped responses and improved stopping efficiency only in proportion to how poorly a person stopped on placebo [8].
- Population
- Healthy volunteers [7]; 28 control volunteers and 26 people with cocaine use disorder [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Single doses on lab tasks. No trial tested daily use for focus at work or study in people without ADHD.
Tics in Tourette's disorder
The label reports that aripiprazole reduced tic scores more than placebo in two trials of 8 and 10 weeks in patients aged 6 to 18.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The aripiprazole label states that efficacy in Tourette's disorder was established in two placebo-controlled trials, with change in a total tic score as the primary outcome. More than 65% of participants were under 13 [10].
- Population
- Patients aged 6 to 18 with Tourette's disorder and a total tic score of at least 20 to 22 out of 50 [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for aripiprazole. Effect sizes were not read from the label for this page, and no meta-analysis was sourced.
Memory in older adults
Small trials found 300 mg a day for 12 weeks improved delayed word recall in adults over 55, while other memory tasks did not change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 54 adults aged 65 or older, 300 mg a day for 12 weeks raised delayed word recall and Stroop scores against placebo. Divided attention and working memory tasks did not change [6]. In 98 healthy Australians over 55, 300 mg a day of BacoMind for 12 weeks improved verbal learning and delayed recall. Visual memory, trail making and subjective memory did not differ [7].
- Population
- 54 older adults in Oregon [6]. 98 adults over 55, 81 completers [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Two small trials. Trial [7] tested BacoMind, made by Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., and its abstract does not report funding.
Anxiety and stress
Small trials found bacopa lowered anxiety and self-reported stress scores against placebo in older and middle-aged adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In the 12-week trial of older adults, depression and anxiety scores fell on bacopa and rose on placebo, and mood scale scores did not differ [6]. In a crossover of 17 healthy volunteers, single 320 mg and 640 mg doses produced some positive mood effects and lower cortisol during multitasking stress [9]. In adults aged 40 to 70, 12 weeks of 300 mg a day reduced self-reported stress reactivity more than placebo (p = 0.03), along with fatigue and stress after a demanding computer task [5].
- Population
- 54 older adults [6]. 17 healthy volunteers [9]. 87 adults with self-reported memory problems [5].
- Sources
- [6], [9], [5]
- Caveats
- Small trials. The authors of [9] call for replication in a larger sample.
Social anxiety
Small trials found response in social anxiety disorder about 4 times as likely on a benzodiazepine as on placebo, in 132 people.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In two studies, treatment response was more likely on a benzodiazepine than placebo (RR 4.03, 95% CI 2.45 to 6.65) [14].
- Population
- 132 adults in 2 studies within a Cochrane review of 66 trials [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- Low-quality evidence from two small studies. The review authors asked readers to weigh the finding against the potential for abuse [14]. Not a labeled use of the four drugs on this page.
Performance anxiety and stage fright
Small trials found propranolol removed physical symptoms of stage fright in musicians and raised performance quality as scored by critics.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In two double-blind trials in musicians, propranolol removed the physical impediments to performance caused by stage fright, including dry mouth, and the quality of performance as judged by experienced music critics improved significantly [17].
- Population
- 29 musicians in two trials [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- Two small trials from 1982, and the abstract gives no effect sizes. Not an FDA-approved use. For diagnosed anxiety disorders, see the next block.
Brain swelling during radiotherapy
One pilot trial found 4,200 mg a day cut brain swelling by more than 75% in 60% of patients against 26% on placebo during radiotherapy.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 44 patients irradiated for brain tumors, 4,200 mg a day cut cerebral edema by more than 75% in 60% of patients against 26% on placebo (p 0.023). Dexamethasone dose, quality of life and cognition did not differ [6].
- Population
- 44 patients with primary or secondary brain tumors [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- A pilot trial. The authors note the edema result may reflect an additional antitumor effect [6].
Cluster headache prevention
One small trial found verapamil lowered attack frequency in episodic cluster headache against placebo over 14 days.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 14 days, the verapamil group had a significant reduction in attack frequency and in use of medication to stop attacks, against placebo [13].
- Population
- 30 people with episodic cluster headache, 15 on verapamil 120 mg three times a day and 15 on placebo [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- One small trial, and the abstract gives no effect size. The evidence is for verapamil, a non-dihydropyridine. Not an FDA-approved use.
Atogepant against topiramate
One trial found 64% halved their migraine days on atogepant against 39% on topiramate, and 12% stopped for side effects against 30%.
Compared with topiramate at the highest tolerated dose of 50 to 100 mg a day [7]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Over 24 weeks, 12% on atogepant 60 mg and 30% on topiramate stopped for adverse events (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.6). A 50% drop in monthly migraine days occurred in 64% against 39% (RR 1.6), and migraine days fell 6.3 against 4.5. One anaphylactic reaction on atogepant was judged drug related [7].
- Population
- 540 adults with at least 4 migraine days a month in 12 countries, 89% women [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One trial. Topiramate's dose was limited to what each person tolerated [7].
Episodic cluster headache
One trial found galcanezumab 300 mg cut weekly cluster attacks by 8.7 against 5.2 on placebo, with 71% responding against 53%.
Compared with placebo [11]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Over weeks 1 to 3, weekly cluster headache attacks fell by 8.7 on galcanezumab and 5.2 on placebo, from about 17.5 a week. At week 3, 71.4% against 52.6% had at least a 50% drop in attacks [11].
- Population
- 106 adults with episodic cluster headache, 88 men, in an 8-week trial [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One small trial, described in the label.
Cervicogenic headache
Limited evidence: two low-quality trials suggested several sessions of neck manipulation eased cervicogenic headache pain more than massage.
Compared with massage [7]
The numbers and sources
Focus and alertness
One trial found caffeinated coffee helped people take in new information and offset fatigue against decaffeinated coffee, with no change in working memory or mood.
Compared with decaffeinated coffee [12]; people drinking no coffee [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 144 volunteers, caffeinated coffee had no effect on initial mood or working memory, improved encoding of new information and counteracted fatigue that built up over the test session, against decaffeinated coffee. It raised blood pressure and pulse [12]. In adults 60 or older, those drinking 266.4 to 495 g of coffee a day had lower odds of a low processing speed score (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.89) than non-drinkers. Decaffeinated coffee was not linked to any cognitive score [13].
- Population
- 144 volunteers, 72 men and 72 women, mean age 21, on one morning [12]. 2,513 US adults aged 60 or older, surveyed once [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- One small single-morning trial, and a survey measured at one time point that cannot show cause. Trials of caffeine on attention are on the caffeine page.
Sleep and quality of life
Limited evidence: a systematic review described better sleep quality and quality of life in a few trials, without pooled estimates.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Narrative synthesis of randomized trials reported improvements in sleep quality and quality of life after cold water immersion [14]. In 5 patients with depression who swam regularly, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores went from 10.4 to 8.0 [21].
- Population
- Healthy adults in 11 randomized trials [14]. 5 patients [21].
- Sources
- [14], [21]
- Caveats
- The review abstract gives no effect sizes for sleep or quality of life. The patient study had no control group.
Alertness, noradrenaline and dopamine
Small studies found plasma noradrenaline rose 530% and dopamine 250% during an hour in 14°C water, and people reported feeling more alert after a 5-minute immersion.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- During 1-hour head-out immersion at 14°C, plasma noradrenaline rose by 530% and dopamine by 250%, with adrenaline unchanged. Immersion at 20°C or 32°C did not produce these rises [16]. After a 5-minute cold bath, 33 adults reported feeling more active, alert and attentive [19].
- Population
- A group of young men, number not given in the abstract [16]. 33 adults [19].
- Sources
- [16], [19]
- Caveats
- Hormones were measured in blood during a 1-hour immersion, far longer than a typical plunge, and blood levels are not brain levels. Neither study had a control group for the self-reported feelings. No trial measured attention or cognitive performance.
Anemia, low white cell counts and nerve damage at very low levels
Case reports: people with very low serum copper had anemia, low neutrophil counts and nerve damage, most often after stomach or weight loss surgery.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A review of records from 1970 to 2005 at one US center identified 40 patients with copper deficiency and blood abnormalities. Ten (25%) had undergone bariatric surgery and 14 (35%) other surgery on the gastrointestinal tract, most often gastric resection. In 12 no cause was identified. Anemia and neutropenia were the most common blood findings, and the majority also had neurologic findings, most commonly myeloneuropathy [11]. A US report describes six patients fed a low-copper enteral diet for 12 to 66 months whose serum copper ranged from 0.9 to 7.2 µmol/L, about 6 to 46 µg/dL. Two had neutropenia, one had anemia and some had reduced bone density, and neutrophil counts normalized after copper was given [3].
- Population
- 40 patients at one US center [11]. Six patients aged 4 to 24 on long-term enteral feeding [3].
- Sources
- [11], [3]
- Caveats
- Case series with no comparison group, drawn from people already found to be deficient. The authors of the review note that copper deficiency is frequently misdiagnosed and may resemble a myelodysplastic syndrome [11]. The µg/dL figures are converted here with the factor on this page.
Depression symptoms
Limited evidence: lowered depression scores about 2 points, below the 3 points counted as a meaningful change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 11 trials (1,093 participants), creatine reduced depression scores by an SMD of -0.34 (95% CI -0.68 to -0.00), equal to 2.2 points on the 17-item Hamilton scale. The minimal important difference on that scale is 3.0 points. Remission odds were higher in 3 trials (OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.76 to 7.56), and response did not differ in 2 trials (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.88) [12]. A systematic review of 5 RCTs (238 participants with a mental disorder) found creatine added to escitalopram or to cognitive behavioral therapy outperformed placebo in major depression, and found no difference from placebo in female adolescents on medication or in bipolar depression [13].
- Population
- People with and without diagnosed depression, mostly creatine added to other treatment [12].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- GRADE certainty was very low. Heterogeneity was 71.3%, and trim-and-fill analysis indicated bias favoring creatine. The authors write that the true effect may be trivial or null [12].
Atrial fibrillation when warfarin is unsuitable, against aspirin
One trial found stroke or systemic embolism at 1.6% a year on apixaban against 3.7% on aspirin, with no significant rise in major bleeding.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Stroke or systemic embolism occurred at 1.6% a year on apixaban and 3.7% a year on aspirin (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.62). Major bleeding occurred at 1.4% a year against 1.2% (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.75), with 11 and 13 intracranial bleeds. Deaths occurred at 3.5% a year against 4.4% (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.02) [14].
- Population
- 5,599 patients with atrial fibrillation for whom vitamin K antagonist therapy was unsuitable [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for apixaban. The trial was stopped early for benefit [14].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 5,599 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Alertness and mental performance
A systematic review found the caffeine dose in a typical energy drink can improve mental performance, with little evidence that taurine, ginseng or other added ingredients contribute.
Compared with caffeine alone or placebo, in the studies reviewed [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A typical 235 ml energy drink provides 40 to 250 mg of caffeine, doses that improve cognitive performance and, at the higher levels, physical performance. Across 32 articles, apart from weak evidence for glucose and guarana extract, there was an overwhelming lack of evidence that ingredients other than caffeine enhance physical or cognitive performance [5].
- Population
- 32 articles testing energy drink ingredients alone or with caffeine [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- A systematic review without pooled numbers. Pooled trials of caffeine and attention are on the caffeine page.
Melatonin production
One small trial found sublingual epitalon raised a urine melatonin marker 1.7-fold in women aged 40 to 50 with low levels. No health outcome was measured.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In women with low urinary excretion of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin, a breakdown product of melatonin, sublingual epitalon raised that excretion 1.7-fold [1]. FDA's review of the trial reports that levels did not change on placebo, and that after treatment the epitalon group reached the level the authors described as normal for age [2].
- Population
- 75 women aged 40 to 50, mostly working night shifts. The 40 with low melatonin marker levels were split between epitalon and placebo sprays for 20 days, and 35 with normal levels served as a reference group [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- One small, short trial. FDA notes that the publication did not specify blinding, did not measure sleep and used a sublingual spray, not injection [2]. A urine marker is a laboratory measure, not a health outcome. A 2026 review found that human evidence for epitalon is limited to small physiological or biomarker studies and that no adequately powered randomized trial has established a therapeutic effect [3].
Depression, as an add-on to antidepressants
Small trials found L-methylfolate added to antidepressants raised response and lowered symptoms in adults with major depression.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Added to antidepressants, L-methylfolate raised response on the Hamilton scale (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.46, 3 studies, 483 patients) and lowered depressive symptom scores (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.17, 4 studies, 507 patients) against antidepressants alone [7].
- Population
- Adults with major depressive disorder already taking antidepressants [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Few small studies. No trial in that review tested methylfolate alone against placebo as the only treatment.
Anemia and cognitive impairment when folate is high and vitamin B12 is low
Limited evidence: one US survey linked high serum folate together with low B12 status to more anemia and cognitive impairment in older adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among seniors with low vitamin B12 status, serum folate above 59 nmol/L (about 26 ng/mL, the 80th percentile) was associated with anemia (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 6.6) and cognitive impairment (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.1), compared with folate at or below that level. Among those with normal B12 status, high folate was associated with less cognitive impairment (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.9) [15].
- Population
- 1,459 seniors in the 1999 to 2002 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, after folic acid fortification began [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- One cross-sectional survey, so it cannot show cause or order. The ng/mL figure is converted here from the study's nmol/L [15].
Migraine
Limited evidence: added to a preventive drug, ginger lowered headache severity at 3 months. Reviewers call any acute or preventive benefit too uncertain.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2026 review found 8 RCTs (594 patients). Added to an active drug for prevention, ginger lowered headache severity at 3 months (MD -3.18, 95% CI -3.94 to -2.42, 2 studies, 183 participants, low certainty). For acute attacks, comparisons rested on single trials and were rated low or very low certainty [11].
- Population
- 594 patients with migraine in 8 RCTs [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The authors concluded it is too uncertain whether ginger helps as an acute or preventive treatment. Several trials combined ginger with other herbs or drugs [11].
Sleep quality and next-day fatigue
Small trials found 3 g of glycine before bed improved self-rated sleep and next-day fatigue in people with poor or shortened sleep.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people with ongoing unsatisfactory sleep, 3 g of glycine before bed improved self-rated sleep quality and sleep efficiency and shortened polysomnographic latency to sleep onset and to slow-wave sleep, without changing sleep architecture. Daytime sleepiness fell and memory recognition improved [1]. In healthy men whose sleep was cut by 25% for three nights, 3 g at bedtime reduced fatigue on a visual analog scale, showed a trend toward less sleepiness, and improved psychomotor vigilance [2]. A 2026 scoping review found 3 glycine sleep trials, all reporting a benefit on at least one sleep outcome [3].
- Population
- Volunteers with ongoing unsatisfactory sleep [1]. 10 healthy men aged 30 to 61, all employees of Ajinomoto Co. [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Few, small trials. The lead author of the restriction trial was affiliated with Ajinomoto Co. [2]. The scoping review did not pool effect sizes [3].
Sleep
Limited evidence: a sham-controlled pilot in 15 people with mild Alzheimer's disease and an uncontrolled study of 12 adults reported better sleep while grounded at night.
Compared with sham grounding [1]; before grounding, in the same people [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In patients with mild Alzheimer's disease, 12 weeks of grounding improved Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores more than sham grounding (p = 0.006) [1]. Twelve adults with sleep problems, pain and stress who slept on a conductive mattress pad for 8 weeks reported sleep dysfunction reduced or eliminated in nearly all of them [2].
- Population
- 22 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease enrolled, 15 completing [1]. 12 adults with sleep dysfunction, pain and stress [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Seven of 22 patients did not finish the sham-controlled study [1]. The 12-person study had no control group and relied on self-report [2].
Stress and night-time cortisol
One uncontrolled study of 12 adults found saliva cortisol at night fell after 6 weeks of sleeping grounded, and self-reported stress eased.
Compared with before grounding, in the same people [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Saliva cortisol measured every 4 hours over 24 hours was significantly lower during night-time sleep at week 6 than before grounding, and 24-hour profiles trended toward a typical daily rhythm. Self-reported stress, anxiety, depression and irritability were reduced or eliminated in nearly all subjects, most clearly in women [2].
- Population
- 12 adults with sleep problems, pain and stress [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- No control group, 12 people, and cortisol was measured in saliva [2].
Dementia
Limited evidence: one Dutch cohort linked both low and high hemoglobin to more dementia over 12 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The association was U-shaped. Against the middle fifth of hemoglobin, the hazard ratio for dementia was 1.29 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.52) in the lowest fifth and 1.20 (1.00 to 1.44) in the highest. Anemia, present in 6.1%, went with a 34% higher risk of dementia (95% CI 11% to 62%) [14].
- Population
- 12,305 people without dementia in the Rotterdam Study, mean age 64.6, 1,520 cases over a mean 12.1 years [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort in one city. It cannot show that hemoglobin itself changes dementia risk [14].
Cognitive decline and Alzheimer disease in older adults
Limited evidence: two cohorts linked lower holotranscobalamin to faster cognitive decline and to more Alzheimer disease over 7 to 10 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an Oxford cohort, a doubling of holotranscobalamin from 50 to 100 pmol/L went with a 30% slower rate of cognitive decline over 10 years, and the association remained significant after adjustment for the other vitamin markers [12]. In a Finnish cohort, each 1 pmol/L higher holotranscobalamin at baseline had an odds ratio for Alzheimer disease of 0.980 (95% CI 0.965 to 0.995), and 0.977 (0.958 to 0.997) after adjustment for confounders that included age, sex, education, the APOE ε4 allele, smoking, stroke and blood pressure [13].
- Population
- 1,648 older adults in Oxford, United Kingdom, tested on 3 or more occasions over 10 years [12]. 271 Finnish adults aged 65 to 79 without dementia, followed for 7 years [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Observational. In a meta-analysis of 11 trials with 22,000 participants, B vitamins given to lower homocysteine had no significant effect on global cognitive function (z score difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02). Those trials did not select people by holotranscobalamin and were not trials of treating B12 deficiency [14].
Thinking and memory in healthy older adults
One trial found better global cognitive scores after 3 months of sessions in 63 healthy adults over 64, compared with a control group that received no treatment.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Global cognitive function improved more in the hyperbaric group than the control group (group by time interaction p = 0.0017), with the largest gains in attention (net effect size 0.745) and information processing speed (net effect size 0.788). Brain blood flow rose in several frontal and parietal regions [10]. A systematic review of 42 studies of hyperbaric oxygen and cognition across neurological conditions described the results as controversial [11].
- Population
- 63 healthy adults over 64, 33 assigned to hyperbaric oxygen and 30 to control [10]. 42 studies in various neurological disorders [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- One trial. The control group had no sham sessions, so participants knew whether they were treated. No follow-up beyond the end of treatment is reported in the abstract.
Stroke recovery months to years later
One trial found better neurological function and quality of life after 40 sessions in people 6 to 36 months after a stroke, with no change during an untreated waiting period.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Neurological function and quality of life improved after 40 sessions of 90 minutes at 2 ATA in both groups. The group that waited 2 months before treatment showed no improvement during the wait. Brain imaging changes tracked the clinical changes [18].
- Population
- 74 people 6 to 36 months after a stroke with at least one motor deficit, 59 analyzed [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- No sham, so everyone knew when they were treated. One center, and the abstract gives no effect sizes.
Alzheimer's disease
Limited evidence: cognitive test scores were higher 1 month after 20 sessions in 42 people with Alzheimer's disease than in 30 untreated patients, in a non-randomized study.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After 40 minutes of hyperbaric oxygen a day for 20 days, Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were significantly higher at 1 month in treated patients than in untreated controls. Activities of daily living improved at 1 and 3 months against baseline [19].
- Population
- 42 people with Alzheimer's disease and 11 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment who were treated, and 30 untreated people with Alzheimer's disease [19].
- Sources
- [19], [1]
- Caveats
- Not randomized and not blinded, with the between-group difference reported only at 1 month. FDA lists Alzheimer's disease among conditions that hyperbaric devices are not proven to cure [1].
Pain and side effects of breast surgery
One trial of 200 women found a 15-minute hypnosis session before breast surgery lowered pain at discharge from 48 to 22 on a 100-point scale against empathic listening.
Compared with nondirective empathic listening as an attention control [16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Women given hypnosis needed less propofol and lidocaine during surgery and reported less pain (22.43 against 47.83 on a 100-point scale), nausea, fatigue, discomfort and emotional upset at discharge. Use of fentanyl, midazolam and recovery room pain medicine did not differ [16].
- Population
- 200 women having breast biopsy or lumpectomy, mean age 48.5 [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- One trial. Patients knew which group they were in [16].
Cognition in iodine-deficient children
Limited evidence: iodine slightly raised cognitive scores in iodine-deficient children, with each result resting on one trial.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After 24 weeks, iodine improved 4 of 7 cognitive and motor tests against placebo, including rapid target marking, symbol search, rapid object naming and Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices. Total thyroxine rose about 40% and low thyroxine fell below 1% [1]. A 2026 Cochrane review of 8 RCTs (2,528 children and adolescents) found a slight rise in cognitive function against placebo (SMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.34), from 1 study of 166 participants rated high certainty [2].
- Population
- 310 children aged 10 to 12 in rural Albania, median urinary iodine 43 µg/L at baseline, 87% with goiter [1]. Trials in seven countries from 1982 to 2009 [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Each cognition result rests on one trial in children with deficiency. The Albanian trial used a single 400 mg dose of iodized oil [1]. The Cochrane trials were old and mostly gave a single large dose [2].
Esketamine against quetiapine
One trial found 27% in remission at 8 weeks on esketamine against 18% on quetiapine, each added to an SSRI or SNRI, in treatment-resistant depression.
Compared with extended-release quetiapine, each added to an SSRI or SNRI [5]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Remission at week 8 occurred in 91 of 336 (27.1%) on esketamine against 60 of 340 (17.6%) on quetiapine. Remission at week 8 with no relapse through week 32 occurred in 21.7% against 14.1% [5].
- Population
- 676 adults with treatment-resistant depression [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- Open-label, with raters blinded. Funded by the maker of esketamine [5].
Against electroconvulsive therapy
One trial found ketamine infusions no worse than electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression without psychosis, with 55% responding against 41%.
Compared with electroconvulsive therapy [6]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Response occurred in 55.4% on ketamine and 41.2% on ECT, a difference of 14.2 percentage points (95% CI 3.9 to 24.2), meeting the noninferiority test. Delayed recall fell more after ECT (T-score -9.7 vs -0.9). Quality of life improved similarly. Ketamine was linked to dissociation and ECT to musculoskeletal effects [6].
- Population
- 403 patients referred for ECT, 365 treated, at five clinical sites [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Open-label. More people withdrew before starting ECT than ketamine [6].
Mood and anxiety
Linked to small drops in momentary anxiety and, less consistently, sadness in the hours after use among regular users tracked by phone. No randomized trial was located.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 357 US adults who used kratom at least 3 days a week, tracked by smartphone prompts for 15 days, kratom use in the prior 3 hours was linked to lower momentary anxiety than no use, and single use events to lower sadness. Use of prescribed anxiety or depression medicines did not change these links [23]. In the same sample, people named managing psychiatric and substance use problems as overall reasons for use [24]. In an online survey, 67% used kratom for anxiety and 65% for depression, and respondents gave it high ratings for these uses [21].
- Population
- 357 regular US kratom users [23][24]. 2,798 self-selected survey respondents [21].
- Sources
- [23], [21], [24]
- Caveats
- Observational studies of people who already use kratom and chose to take part. The authors describe the reductions in anxiety as small and call for randomized trials [23]. Self-ratings may reflect relief of withdrawal between doses.
Symptoms of mental disorders
Limited evidence: a review of 11 trials reported fewer symptoms in schizophrenia, anxiety disorders and ADHD, often alongside medication. One anxiety trial found no effect.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 11 RCTs from six countries reported that theanine reduced psychiatric symptoms more than control in schizophrenia, anxiety disorders and ADHD [8].
- Population
- Patients with schizophrenia, ADHD, OCD, major depression, sleep disorders, GAD or Tourette syndrome, often taking it alongside their medication [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- No pooled effect sizes are given in the abstract. Results differ by disorder, and an adjunctive GAD trial found no anxiety effect [9].
Newly diagnosed focal epilepsy, compared with other first drugs
One trial found lamotrigine matched or beat levetiracetam and zonisamide for 12-month seizure remission in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy, with fewer adverse reactions.
Compared with levetiracetam and zonisamide [8]; a low dose of valproate [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Levetiracetam did not meet the trial's non-inferiority test against lamotrigine for time to 12-month remission (HR 1.18, 97.5% CI 0.95 to 1.47), while zonisamide did (HR 1.03, 97.5% CI 0.83 to 1.28). In the per-protocol analysis, remission was more likely on lamotrigine than levetiracetam (HR 1.32) or zonisamide (HR 1.37). Adverse reactions were reported by 33% starting lamotrigine, 44% starting levetiracetam and 45% starting zonisamide [8]. In a label trial of switching to a single drug, 42% on lamotrigine and 69% on low-dose valproate met the criteria for leaving the trial [4].
- Population
- 990 people aged 5 or older with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy in an open-label UK trial followed for at least 2 years [8]; 156 adults with partial-onset seizures [4].
- Sources
- [8], [4]
- Caveats
- The main trial was open label. The label states that its valproate arm used a deliberately low dose, so that trial does not show lamotrigine beats an adequate valproate dose [4].
Cognition in older adults with impairment
Small trials found higher cognition scores than placebo in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's, with scores falling again after stopping.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 30 Japanese adults aged 50 to 80 with mild cognitive impairment, four 250 mg tablets of 96% dried mushroom powder three times a day for 16 weeks raised scores on the revised Hasegawa dementia scale compared with placebo at weeks 8, 12 and 16. Scores fell again 4 weeks after stopping [1]. In a 12-week trial, MMSE scores improved with fruiting-body supplements while two other memory tests did not differ [2]. In 49 weeks of erinacine A-enriched mycelium in mild Alzheimer's disease, MMSE and daily-living scores were higher than placebo, and placebo CASI scores fell [3]. A systematic review pooling one RCT and one pilot trial reported a weighted mean MMSE increase of 1.17 [4].
- Population
- Older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's disease [1][2][3][4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Small trials using different preparations. The Alzheimer's trial was supported by Grape King Bio, which paid salaries for five authors and supplied research materials [3].
Mood, depression and anxiety
One trial found depression scores fell from baseline in 30 women over 4 weeks, but most comparisons were not against placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 30 women given lion's mane cookies or placebo cookies for 4 weeks, depression (CES-D) and indefinite complaint scores fell from baseline in the mushroom group. Two complaint items were lower than placebo, and concentration, irritability and anxiety tended to be lower [7].
- Population
- 30 women [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One small 4-week trial. Most comparisons were against baseline, not placebo [7].
Repeat stroke after a minor stroke in type 2 diabetes
One open-label trial found fewer repeat strokes within 90 days, 7.9% against 13.8%, in adults with type 2 diabetes after a minor stroke.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Within 90 days, stroke recurred in 7.9% on liraglutide added to standard care and 13.8% on standard care alone (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.91). An excellent functional outcome was reached by 87.3% against 77.8% (OR 1.95). Symptomatic brain bleeding and death were low and similar between groups [11].
- Population
- 636 adults with type 2 diabetes randomized within 24 hours of a minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack, at 27 hospitals in China [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One open-label trial over 90 days, which the authors describe as underpowered [11].
Long COVID
Limited evidence: fatigue, brain fog, sleep and pain improved from baseline in uncontrolled studies of long COVID. No randomized trials were found.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2026 systematic review screened 397 records and found no randomized trials. In 4 pre-post studies (155 people) at 1 to 6 mg a day, fatigue (Hedges' g -0.74, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.37), brain fog (g -0.53), sleep (g -0.60), pain (g -0.93) and daily function (g -0.93) improved from baseline [12].
- Population
- 155 people with long COVID in the US and Ireland in uncontrolled studies [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- The review rated certainty as low, and its studies had no control group [12]. No peer-reviewed randomized trial was located.
Mood, energy and quality of life
One trial found better mood, energy and quality of life than placebo over 12 weeks in Peruvian adults at low and high altitude.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 175 adults living at low and high altitude, 3 g a day of red or black maca extract for 12 weeks improved mood, energy, health-related quality of life and chronic mountain sickness scores compared with placebo. Black maca lowered blood glucose [7].
- Population
- Adults in Peru at low and high altitude [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One trial of spray-dried extracts.
Sleep
Small trials found sleep onset about 17 minutes faster in older adults with insomnia, with no significant change in total sleep. Quality was rated low.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 3 RCTs (151 older adults), sleep onset was 17.36 minutes shorter on magnesium than placebo (95% CI -27.27 to -7.44). Total sleep time rose by 16.06 minutes, which was not statistically significant [7].
- Population
- Older adults with insomnia in three countries [7].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- All three trials were at moderate to high risk of bias and the evidence was rated low to very low quality [7]. A 2026 systematic review of 12 RCTs in adults could not pool them. Findings were inconsistent across self-reported sleep, EEG, actigraphy and wearable measures, and certainty was low to very low [8].
Sleep
Limited evidence: low-certainty trials in critically ill adults and cancer survivors found better self-reported sleep quality after massage.
Compared with control groups the source abstracts do not describe [16][17]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In critically ill adults, foot reflexology massage improved subjective sleep quality in subgroup analysis, and a two-night course helped in cardiac care patients [16]. In 4 trials in cancer survivors, massage improved self-reported sleep and accelerometer-recorded long sleep episodes [17].
- Population
- 569 participants in 10 trials in adult critical care [16]. Cancer survivors in 4 trials [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Overall certainty was rated low [16]. No trial in healthy adults or in people with insomnia alone was located.
Shift work
One trial found better sleep quality on days off in nurses on shift work who took 0.3 mg on nights off, with no change in sleep duration.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 46 nurses on fixed shifts, 0.3 mg of melatonin taken on nights off improved self-reported sleep quality on days off by 35.33% (p < 0.001) and lowered climacteric symptoms by 15.8% against placebo (p = 0.01). Total sleep duration did not change [12].
- Population
- Climacteric women working morning, afternoon or night shifts in one hospital [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- One small trial, retrospectively registered. Melatonin was taken on nights off, so the trial does not show effects on sleep after night shifts.
Memory and attention in healthy adults
Small trials found one low dose raised brain activity and memory retrieval 7% in healthy adults. No trial of repeated use was sourced.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- One hour after a low oral dose, methylene blue raised functional MRI activity during attention and short-term memory tasks against placebo, and correct responses during memory retrieval rose 7% (P = 0.01) [3]. In adults with claustrophobia, 260 mg given after a fear-exposure session improved contextual memory at follow-up. People with low fear at the end of the session had less fear 1 month later on methylene blue, while people with moderate to high fear tended to do worse [4].
- Population
- 26 healthy adults aged 22 to 62 [3]; 42 adults with marked claustrophobic fear [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Two small single-dose trials, one measuring brain imaging more than behavior [3]. No trial of repeated use in healthy people was sourced.
Depression and anxiety in bipolar disorder
One trial found lower depression and anxiety scores in bipolar disorder when added to lamotrigine, against a low comparison dose.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Added to lamotrigine, methylene blue 195 mg lowered depression scores (MADRS P = 0.02, HAM-D P = 0.05) and anxiety scores (HAM-A P = 0.02) against a 15 mg comparison dose. Cognitive symptoms did not change significantly [5].
- Population
- 37 people with bipolar disorder in a 6-month crossover trial [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- One small trial using last observation carried forward. The abstract gives P values without effect sizes.
Cognitive decline in older adults
Limited evidence: one Oxford cohort linked a doubling of methylmalonic acid to cognitive decline more than 50% faster over 10 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A doubling of methylmalonic acid from 250 to 500 nmol/L went with a rate of cognitive decline more than 50% faster on the Mini-Mental State Examination. The association remained significant after adjustment for the other vitamin markers. Holotranscobalamin and homocysteine also predicted decline, and folate did not [11].
- Population
- 1,648 older adults in Oxford, United Kingdom, tested on 3 or more occasions over 10 years [11].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Observational, from one cohort. The authors state that randomized trials are required to determine whether B12 supplementation is relevant to preventing dementia [11]. In a meta-analysis of 11 trials with 22,000 participants, B vitamins given to lower homocysteine had no significant effect on global cognitive function (z score difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02). Those trials did not select people by methylmalonic acid and were not trials of treating B12 deficiency [12].
Chronic daily headache
One trial found tizanidine lowered a headache index by 54% against 19% on placebo over 12 weeks in adults with chronic daily headache.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In the last 4 weeks of treatment, the headache index improved 54% on tizanidine and 19% on placebo, severe headache days 55% against 21%, and headache duration 35% against 19%. Total headache days improved 30% against 22%, which was not significant. Sleepiness was reported by 47% on tizanidine, dizziness by 24% and dry mouth by 23% [11].
- Population
- 134 adults randomized after a placebo run-in, 77% with migraine, of whom 85 completed 12 weeks [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One trial with many dropouts, at a mean dose of 18 mg a day. Not an FDA-approved use [12].
Addiction recovery and withdrawal
One uncontrolled study of 50 people with substance use disorder found craving, anxiety and depression scores fell after infusions combining NAD with another agent.
Compared with before the infusions, in the same people [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 50 people with poly-drug substance use disorder resistant to standard treatment, craving (P = 1.063E-9), anxiety (P = 5.487E-7) and depression (P = 1.763E-4) scores fell from baseline after infusions of NAD with an enkephalinase inhibitor. In a subset of 40, urine tests midway through the study detected no illicit drug use [8].
- Population
- 50 adults with substance use disorder [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- No control group, so time and other care cannot be separated from the infusions. NAD was combined with an enkephalinase inhibitor, so its own share is unknown. Outcomes were Likert-scale ratings, and the abstract gives P values without effect sizes [8].
Acute migraine
One trial found tramadol with acetaminophen relieved migraine pain at 2 hours in 55.8% against 33.8% on placebo, without easing nausea.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Treatment response at 2 hours was 55.8% on tramadol with acetaminophen and 33.8% on placebo, and 22.1% against 9.3% were pain free. At 24 hours 52.7% against 37.9% were pain free. Sensitivity to light and sound was less frequent at 2 hours. Migraine-related nausea did not differ (38.5% against 29.4%) [14].
- Population
- 305 adults with migraine, 154 on tramadol with acetaminophen and 151 on placebo [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- One trial of a single attack, of the tramadol and acetaminophen combination only. See the risk block on headache frequency below.
Sleep
One trial found self-rated sleep improved on two forms of phenibut in older adults with insomnia, with no placebo comparison.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a randomized trial in adults with insomnia and sensitivity to weather, phenibut taken as capsules and phenibut taken as powder emptied from the capsules for 4 weeks both improved total scores on a subjective sleep questionnaire (p = 0.00001 and p = 0.000001). The powder group scored higher on sleep quality (p = 0.00027) and quality of awakening (p = 0.00001) [4].
- Population
- 67 adults aged 60 to 70, 33 on capsules and 34 on powder [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Both groups took phenibut, so the trial compared two forms of it. It did not compare phenibut with placebo or no treatment. Sleep was self-rated. Published in Russian with an English abstract [4].
Stress and fitness
One small trial found better VO2 max, grip strength and mood scores than placebo in sedentary female students over 30 days.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 78 female college students in India, 1,000 mg a day for 30 days improved heart rate, VO2 max, physical work capacity and right-hand grip strength against placebo, and anxiety, depression and well-being scores improved. The 500 mg dose differed from the 1,000 mg dose on VO2 max and work capacity [6].
- Population
- 78 sedentary female students, mean age 20.6 [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One small trial. The abstract does not report effect sizes or funding.
Stroke
Linked to fewer strokes in Finnish men and women, with a hazard ratio of 0.38 at 4 to 7 sessions a week against one.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- During a median 14.9 years, 155 strokes occurred. Compared with one session a week, 4 to 7 sessions carried a hazard ratio of 0.38 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.81) after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity and socioeconomic status [13].
- Population
- 1,628 men and women aged 53 to 74 with no history of stroke, in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease study [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Observational, one cohort. Only 34 hemorrhagic strokes occurred, and the association there was described as modest [13].
Dementia and Alzheimer's disease
Linked to fewer dementia diagnoses in two Finnish cohorts, with hazard ratios of 0.34 and 0.81 for the most frequent users in each.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 2,315 men followed for 20.7 years, 204 developed dementia and 123 Alzheimer's disease. Against one session a week, hazard ratios for dementia were 0.78 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.06) at 2 to 3 sessions and 0.34 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.71) at 4 to 7 sessions. For Alzheimer's disease they were 0.80 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.20) and 0.35 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.90) [15]. In 13,994 men and women followed for 39 years with 1,805 dementia diagnoses, sauna bathing 9 to 12 times a month against under 4 times carried a hazard ratio of 0.47 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.88) in the first 20 years and 0.81 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.97) over the whole follow-up [16].
- Population
- Finnish men aged 42 to 60 [15]. Finnish men and women aged 30 to 69 in the Mobile Clinic Follow-up Survey [16].
- Sources
- [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Observational. The two cohorts are independent of each other, and the association weakened over longer follow-up in the larger one [16].
Chronic tension-type headache
One trial found headache intensity fell 1.27 points more on a pain scale with 8 weeks of regular sauna in 37 people. Headache duration did not change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Mean change in headache intensity on a numerical pain rating scale differed between sauna and control by 1.27 points (95% CI 0.48 to 2.07, p = 0.002). Headache duration, sleep disturbance, depression and headache disability did not differ between groups [20].
- Population
- 37 people with chronic tension-type headache, 17 assigned to sauna plus advice and 20 to advice alone, for 8 weeks [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- One small unblinded trial.
Stress and fatigue
Limited evidence: a review of Soviet-era research reports clinical trials in asthenia and stress protection in animals, without figures in its summary.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A review of research from the former USSR reports that animal studies found Schisandra protected against a broad range of stressors, including heat, cold, immobilization and low air pressure, and that numerous clinical trials reported benefit in asthenia, neurosis and astheno-depressive states. In healthy people it altered nitric oxide and cortisol levels in blood and saliva [7].
- Population
- Animal studies and clinical trials in the former USSR, reviewed [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- A narrative review, largely of older Russian-language studies. Its abstract gives no trial sizes, comparison groups or effect sizes [7]. No recent placebo-controlled trial of Schisandra alone for stress or fatigue was located.
Children's mental health after cutting family screen time
One trial found fewer behavioral and emotional difficulties in children after two weeks of strict family screen limits.
Compared with a control group of families [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The total difficulties score fell by 1.67 points more than in controls (95% CI -2.68 to -0.67, Cohen d 0.53). Emotional symptoms and peer problems fell (-1.03) and prosocial behavior rose (0.84) [5].
- Population
- 181 children, mean age about 9, in 89 Danish families, with leisure screen use cut to 3 hours a week or less for 2 weeks [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- A secondary analysis of one short trial. Parents who knew their group rated their children, and whether the effect lasts is unknown [5].
Activity and sleep after cutting family screen time
One trial found children were active about 46 minutes more a day after two weeks of strict family screen limits, with no change in sleep measured by EEG.
Compared with families told to carry on as usual [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Children's leisure non-sedentary activity rose by 45.8 minutes a day against controls (95% CI 27.9 to 63.6). Sleep measured by single-channel EEG did not differ between groups [6].
- Population
- 181 children and 164 adults in 89 Danish families whose parent used screens for leisure over 2.4 hours a day [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Two weeks, with phones and tablets handed in, which is stricter than most everyday limits. 97% of children complied [6].
Recovery after ischemic stroke
Limited evidence: two Russian studies reported faster recovery after ischemic stroke with semax added to standard care, without effect sizes, randomization or blinding described.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In the acute period of hemispheric ischemic stroke, adding semax to intensive therapy was reported to increase the rate of recovery of general and focal deficits, especially motor deficits, compared with patients on conventional therapy [1]. After ischemic stroke, patients who received semax during rehabilitation had higher blood BDNF levels throughout the study, and faster improvement and a better final score on the Barthel index of daily living activities, than those who did not [2]. Neither abstract gives effect sizes.
- Population
- 30 patients on semax and 80 controls with acute hemispheric ischemic stroke [1]. 110 patients after ischemic stroke, mean age 58, split into semax and no semax subgroups within early and late rehabilitation groups, with two 10-day courses [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Both studies were published in Russian with English abstracts, and neither abstract describes randomization or blinding. Semax was given alongside standard therapy. FDA did not evaluate the Russian-language stroke studies because full English versions were not available, and found that professional society stroke guidelines do not discuss semax [3].
Sleep
Small trials of the natural hormone GHRH, not sermorelin, found more deep sleep when it was given in pulses at night, but not as a continuous infusion.
Compared with placebo [7][8]; the same men's sleep without GHRH, as the abstract describes it [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 7 healthy men, four 50 microgram IV boluses of GHRH through the night raised slow-wave sleep to 20.2% of the night, against 14.0% on placebo [7]. In healthy volunteers, the same pulsed schedule increased slow-wave sleep (P < 0.01) and REM sleep (P < 0.05) against placebo, while a continuous infusion of a similar total dose did not change sleep significantly [8]. In healthy young men, a single IV dose in the first deep-sleep period did not change slow-wave sleep but increased REM sleep. Given in the third REM period, it was followed by an almost 10-fold rise in slow-wave sleep and less wake time [9].
- Population
- 7 healthy men [7]. Healthy volunteers [8]. Healthy young men [9].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- These trials gave GHRH intravenously, not sermorelin, the 1-29 fragment of GHRH that the trials on this page gave under the skin [2][4]. They were small, lasted one night each, and the effect depended on timing and on pulsed rather than continuous dosing [8][9].
Stroke and death at higher levels
Limited evidence: one British cohort of 7,690 middle-aged men linked creatinine above 1.31 mg/dL to 60% more strokes over about 15 years.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Median creatinine was 98 µmol/L (1.11 mg/dL). Above 116 µmol/L (1.31 mg/dL), the top tenth, the relative risk of stroke was 1.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.1) against all other men after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. For major ischemic heart disease, the relative risk at 130 µmol/L (1.47 mg/dL) or above was 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) after adjustment. Death from any cause and from cardiovascular disease was significantly raised only above the 97.5th percentile, and there was no association with death from cancer [6].
- Population
- 7,690 men aged 40 to 59 from 24 British towns, followed for an average of 14.75 years, with 287 strokes, 967 major ischemic heart disease events and 1,259 deaths [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort of middle-aged men in one country [6]. Studies that convert creatinine to an estimated filtration rate are covered on the eGFR page.
Stroke in a genetic study
Limited evidence: one genetic study found higher serum iron went with slightly more stroke, an odds ratio of 1.07 per standard deviation.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Mendelian randomization study, the odds ratio for stroke was 1.07 per standard deviation higher genetically determined serum iron (95% CI 1.01 to 1.14), 1.06 for transferrin saturation (1.01 to 1.11) and 1.18 for ferritin (1.02 to 1.36). Among types of ischemic stroke, the finding was driven by cardioembolic stroke [8].
- Population
- Gene associations with iron status from 48,972 people, and with stroke from the MEGASTROKE consortium [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- The same gene variants pointed toward less coronary artery disease in a separate study, so the genetic evidence runs in opposite directions for two vascular outcomes [7][8].
Shifting night owls to an earlier schedule
One trial moved night owls' sleep and wake times about 2 hours earlier and found less depression and stress and better morning reaction time and grip strength.
Compared with a control group the abstract does not describe [1]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Earlier wake and sleep times, fixed meal times, limits on caffeine and timed exercise advanced sleep and wake timing by about 2 hours, measured by actigraphy, dim light melatonin onset and the cortisol awakening response, with no loss of sleep duration. Self-reported depression and stress improved, and reaction time and grip strength improved in the morning hours [1].
- Population
- Night owls with a late sleep and wake pattern, in one randomized controlled trial in a real-world setting. The abstract does not give the head count or length [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- One small trial. Participants knew their group, and mood and stress were self-rated. The trial changed several habits at once, so it cannot say which mattered.
Insomnia symptoms with tracker feedback and guidance
One trial found feedback on tracker data with guidance lowered insomnia severity more than sleep education in 113 adults with insomnia symptoms over 5 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Compared with sleep education and hygiene, the group given feedback on sensor-based sleep data with guidance on interpreting it had lower Insomnia Severity Index scores (p = .011, d = 0.51) and lower sleep disturbance (p = .036, d = 0.42) after the intervention. Sleep-related impairment, depression, anxiety and the gap between self-reported and sensor-measured sleep did not differ between groups (P > .40) [22].
- Population
- 113 adults with Insomnia Severity Index scores of 10 or higher (mean age 47.5, 64.9% female), 5 weeks. 103 completed [22].
- Sources
- [22]
- Caveats
- The intervention combined a Fitbit and an EEG headband with an individual session and two check-in calls, so the trial does not isolate the tracker from the guidance. Single-blind, with self-reported outcomes [22].
Sleep quality in healthy adults
One small trial found a week of wearing a tracker with feedback lowered self-reported sleep disturbance in 32 healthy adults, with total daily sleep unchanged.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a randomized crossover trial, one week of wearing a WHOOP device that gave sleep feedback, plus sleep logs, was compared with one week of sleep logs alone. PROMIS sleep disturbance scores were lower with the device (B = -1.69, 95% CI -3.11 to -0.27, P = .021). Self-reported daytime naps rose slightly (B = 3.2, SE 1.4, P = .023), and total daily sleep did not change (P = .43) [14].
- Population
- 32 healthy adults (21 women, mean age 23.8) without medical conditions or sleep disorders [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- One week per condition, a self-reported outcome and no blinding. Young healthy volunteers at one center [14].
Total sleep time, Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Sense 2 and Oura Ring Gen3
One study found all three devices estimated total sleep time within 10 minutes of polysomnography on average in 35 healthy adults over one night.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Sense 2, Oura Ring Gen3
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, one inpatient night
- Effect
- Mean total sleep time was 421 minutes on the Oura Ring against 430 on polysomnography, 428 on the Fitbit against 431, and 442 on the Apple Watch against 434. None of the three differences was statistically significant. Intraclass correlation with polysomnography was 0.74 for Oura, 0.56 for Fitbit and 0.85 for Apple Watch [3].
- Population
- 35 adults aged 20 to 50 without a sleep disorder, one night. Fitbit data came from 33 and Apple Watch data from 29 [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Funded by Oura Ring Inc., and the lead author sits on Oura's medical advisory board. The authors note that nightly estimates for an individual may diverge more widely than the group averages. Healthy sleepers only, one night [3].
Sleep and wake detection, Apple Watch S6, Garmin Forerunner 245 Music, Oura Ring Generation 2, Polar Vantage V, Somfit and WHOOP 3.0
One study found six devices agreed with polysomnography on sleep versus wake in 86 to 89% of epochs in 53 healthy young adults.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch S6, Garmin Forerunner 245 Music, Oura Ring Generation 2, Polar Vantage V, Somfit, WHOOP 3.0
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, one laboratory night with 9 hours in bed
- Effect
- Agreement on sleep versus wake, with Cohen's kappa, was 88% (0.30) for Apple Watch, 89% (0.35) for Garmin, 87% (0.44) for Polar, 89% (0.51) for Oura, 86% (0.44) for WHOOP and 87% (0.48) for Somfit. Agreement on individual sleep stages was lower, from 50% (kappa 0.25) for Garmin to 65% (kappa 0.52) for Somfit. The authors concluded all six were valid for the timing and duration of sleep and that all six required improvement for specific sleep stages [17].
- Population
- 53 adults (26 women), mean age 25.4, one night [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- Young healthy adults on a single night with a fixed 9 hours in bed. Apple Watch sleep was scored through Sleep Watch, a third-party app, in 5 minute epochs. The authors belong to a research group that receives funding and equipment from WHOOP Inc. and state WHOOP had no role in the study [17].
Sleep stages, Oura Ring Gen3
One study found time in light and deep sleep did not differ from polysomnography in 96 healthy adults, while REM sleep was underestimated by 4 to 6 minutes.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Oura Ring Generation 3 with Oura Sleep Staging Algorithm 2.0, worn on the dominant and non-dominant hands
- Compared with
- Ambulatory polysomnography, up to three nights per person
- Effect
- Time in light sleep and deep sleep did not differ significantly from polysomnography. REM sleep was underestimated by 4.1 to 5.6 minutes. Epoch accuracy by stage ranged from 75.5% (light sleep) to 90.6% (REM sleep). For sleep versus wake, sensitivity was 94.4 to 94.5% and specificity 73.0 to 74.6% [10].
- Population
- 96 generally healthy Japanese adults aged 20 to 70, contributing 421,045 epochs [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Generally healthy adults in one country. Other studies of the same ring generation reported different results: 53% four-stage accuracy in sleep clinic patients [11], fair agreement (kappa 0.2 to 0.4) in a hospital and clinic sample [20], and a 71.5 minute overestimate of deep sleep in older adults [7].
Nerve pain after chemotherapy
One trial found duloxetine lowered pain from chemotherapy nerve damage by 0.73 points more than placebo on a 10-point scale over 5 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Average pain fell by 1.06 points on duloxetine and 0.34 on placebo, a difference of 0.73 (95% CI 0.26 to 1.20) on a scale of 0 to 10. Any decrease in pain was reported by 59% on duloxetine and 38% on placebo [22].
- Population
- 231 adults with painful neuropathy after taxane or oxaliplatin chemotherapy, in a crossover trial of 30 mg for one week then 60 mg for four weeks [22].
- Sources
- [22]
- Caveats
- One trial of 5 weeks per period. Not an approved use.
Mood
One large cohort linked each extra daily hour outdoors in daylight to lower odds of depression and low mood, mostly in cross-sectional analyses.
Compared with each hour less of daylight outdoors a day [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Participants spent a median 2.5 daylight hours outdoors a day. Each extra hour was linked to lower odds of lifetime major depression (95% CI for the odds ratio 0.92 to 0.98), antidepressant use (0.92 to 0.98) and low mood (0.87 to 0.90), and higher odds of happiness (1.41 to 1.48). Longitudinal analyses agreed with smaller effects [10].
- Population
- UK Biobank adults aged 37 to 73, 54% women, over 400,000 analyzed [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Observational, with self-reported time outdoors. People who are depressed go out less, so reverse causation is likely in part, and outdoor time also brings exercise and company.
Sleep and body clock
Limited evidence: daylight was linked to fewer insomnia symptoms in one cohort, and a week camping in natural light shifted the body clock earlier in a small study.
Compared with each hour less of daylight outdoors a day [10]; the same people living with electric lighting [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Each extra daily hour outdoors was linked to fewer insomnia symptoms (95% CI for the odds ratio 0.94 to 0.97), less frequent tiredness (0.80 to 0.82), easier getting up (1.46 to 1.49) and an earlier chronotype [10]. After a week of natural light only, the internal biological night began at sunset and ended just after sunrise. Later chronotypes shifted the most [11].
- Population
- Over 400,000 UK Biobank adults [10]. 8 adults aged about 30, one week at home then one week camping in Colorado in July [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- The cohort is observational [10]. The camping study was small and short, and measured clock timing, not sleep quality [11].
Fibromyalgia, against aerobic exercise
One trial of 226 adults with fibromyalgia found tai chi improved symptom scores more than aerobic exercise at 24 weeks, by 16.2 points when matched for time.
Compared with supervised aerobic exercise twice a week for 24 weeks [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire scores improved 5.5 points more across the combined tai chi groups than with aerobic exercise (95% CI 0.6 to 10.4), and 16.2 points more when tai chi was given at the same dose (95% CI 8.7 to 23.6). Anxiety, self-efficacy and coping also improved more. Twenty-four weeks of tai chi improved scores more than 12 weeks [11].
- Population
- 226 adults with fibromyalgia, 151 in four tai chi groups and 75 in aerobic exercise [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One single-blind trial. Attendance was higher in tai chi than in aerobic exercise, which may explain part of the difference [11].
Stress hormones and mood
One small 4-week trial found lower tension, anger and saliva cortisol, and higher saliva testosterone, in moderately stressed adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 63 moderately stressed adults (32 men, 31 women), 4 weeks of a hot-water root extract lowered tension (11%), anger (12%) and confusion (15%) scores, lowered salivary cortisol exposure by 16%, and raised salivary testosterone by 37% compared with placebo [6].
- Population
- 63 adults [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One 4-week trial. The first author's listed affiliation is SupplementWatch. Cortisol and testosterone were measured in saliva.
Sleep in dementia
One trial found trazodone 50 mg added about 42 minutes of night sleep over two weeks in 30 people with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Total night-time sleep rose by 42.46 minutes against placebo (95% CI 0.9 to 84.0) and sleep efficiency by 8.53 percentage points (95% CI 1.9 to 15.1). Night-time awakenings and daytime sleep changed little. No serious adverse effects were reported [9].
- Population
- 30 people with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease in one trial within a Cochrane review [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- One small trial of two weeks, rated low certainty [9].
Generalized anxiety
One trial found 69% of completers on trazodone reported moderate to marked improvement in generalized anxiety over 8 weeks, against 47% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among completers, moderate to marked improvement was reported by 69% on trazodone, 73% on imipramine, 66% on diazepam and 47% on placebo. Diazepam led in the first 2 weeks, and trazodone reached a comparable effect from week 3 to week 8. People on the antidepressants reported more adverse effects than people on diazepam [10].
- Population
- Outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder in an 8-week placebo-controlled trial [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- One trial from 1993, reported for completers only, which its authors said needed replication. Not an approved use.
Infant development with B12 in pregnancy
One trial found slightly higher infant mental development scores at 250 µg than at 50 µg a day in vegetarian pregnant women in India and Nepal.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Infants of mothers given 250 µg of methylcobalamin a day had higher mental development scores at 9 to 12 months than infants of mothers given 50 µg (103.7 against 101.7, p = 0.008). Motor scores did not differ. Maternal B12 rose more on the higher dose (104.9 against 47.5 pg/mL) [9].
- Population
- 531 vegetarian women in India and Nepal, from the first trimester to 6 months after birth [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- One trial comparing two doses, with no placebo group. Newborn size, APGAR scores and illness did not differ [9].
Chemotherapy side effects
Small trials found fewer chemotherapy side effects in women with cancer, halving hand-foot syndrome in one and lowering nerve damage in another.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In women taking capecitabine, grade 2 or worse hand-foot syndrome occurred in 14.5% on 0.5 mg of methylcobalamin three times a day and 29.1% on placebo (risk difference -14.5%, 95% CI -24.9% to -4.1%). Dose reduction or stopping capecitabine for hand-foot syndrome did not significantly differ (7.7% against 13.7%). Other adverse events were similar [11]. In a second trial, chemotherapy nerve damage (a questionnaire score of 4 or more) occurred in 5% on oral B12 and 20% on placebo (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.66). Neurotoxicity quality of life scores did not differ [12].
- Population
- 234 women with HER2-negative early breast cancer at 7 hospitals in China, up to 24 weeks [11]; 40 patients with gynecological cancer on taxane and platinum chemotherapy in Thailand [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- The two trials measured different side effects. The second trial was small [12].
Depression symptoms
One trial found lower depression scores over 1 month only in adults with mild or worse symptoms at baseline. Anxiety and stress did not change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 1 month, 100 mg of pyridoxine a day lowered depression scores more than placebo or 1,000 µg of B12 only in participants with mild or worse depression symptoms at baseline (partial η² 0.20). Anxiety and stress scores did not change [5].
- Population
- 267 adults from the general population, 215 of them female. 58 had mild or worse depression symptoms at baseline [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- One trial, and the effect appeared in a subgroup defined by baseline scores. Participants were not patients with diagnosed depression [5].
Memory in postmenopausal women
One trial without placebo found memory scores rose from baseline over 6 months in postmenopausal women with mild cognitive impairment in India.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 6 months, scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment rose from baseline on 25 mg of pyridoxine a day (p = 0.0323), and homocysteine fell. The abstract reports change from baseline, not a comparison with the untreated group [7].
- Population
- 180 postmenopausal women with mild cognitive impairment in India, randomized to pyridoxine, 100 mg of vitamin C, or no treatment [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One trial with no placebo. Menopause quality of life scores did not change overall [7].
Alzheimer's disease
One trial found daily living ability declined about 19% more slowly per year on 2,000 IU a day in veterans with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over a mean 2.27 years, scores on a daily living scale declined 3.15 units less on 2,000 IU a day than on placebo (95% CI 0.92 to 5.39), which the authors equate to a 19% slower decline per year. Caregiver time rose least in the vitamin E group [10].
- Population
- 613 veterans with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease taking a cholinesterase inhibitor, 561 analyzed [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- One trial at 14 Veterans Affairs centers. 52 participants with no follow-up data were left out of the analysis [10].
Cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment
One trial found better immediate recall and orientation scores after 10 sessions in 62 people with mild cognitive impairment, compared with a sham.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After the 10th session, immediate recall on the DemTect and orientation on the Test Your Memory differed between groups in favor of cryotherapy. Self-rated mood improved (p = 0.02 after the sessions, p = 0.07 two weeks later) [15].
- Population
- 62 people with mild cognitive impairment, 33 at -110°C to -160°C and 29 in a sham group [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- One trial. Two subtests of several differed, and the difference was measured straight after the course.
Fatigue in multiple sclerosis
Limited evidence: fatigue and functional status scores improved after a series of sessions in 48 people with multiple sclerosis, in a study with no untreated group.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After a series of daily sessions at -110°C or lower, functional status and the feeling of fatigue improved in both a low-fatigue and a high-fatigue group, with larger changes in the high-fatigue group [23].
- Population
- Two groups of 24 people with multiple sclerosis, matched for age and sex [23].
- Sources
- [23]
- Caveats
- Both groups received cryotherapy, so there is no comparison with no treatment.
Brain injury and movement disorders
Limited evidence: case reports and small trials described brief improvements, lasting 1 to 4 hours, in some people with disorders of consciousness or movement disorders.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review found 67 studies of zolpidem for neurologic conditions other than insomnia: 31 in movement disorders, 22 in disorders of consciousness and 14 in other conditions such as stroke and traumatic brain injury. Reported effects included gains on coma recovery, Parkinson disease and dystonia rating scales, and generally lasted 1 to 4 hours before the person returned to baseline. Sedation was the most common adverse effect [14].
- Population
- 67 studies, of which 28 were case reports, 8 case series and 9 randomized trials. Only 11 studies had more than 10 participants [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- Mostly case reports and small trials, with no pooled effect size. Not an approved use.
Reported risks358
Trouble sleeping
Shown to cause insomnia in 12% to 27% on extended-release mixed amphetamine salts against 2% to 13% on placebo, and in 12% against 6% on methylphenidate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- On extended-release mixed amphetamine salts, insomnia was reported by 17% of children against 2% on placebo, 12% of adolescents against 4% and 27% of adults against 13% [17]. On extended-release methylphenidate in adults it was 12% against 6% [21], and on lisdexamfetamine in adults with binge eating disorder 20% against 8% [18]. In children, amphetamines raised the rate of insomnia (RR 3.80, 95% CI 2.12 to 6.83) [3].
- Population
- 374 children, 233 adolescents and 191 adults [17]; 415 adults [21]; 373 adults on lisdexamfetamine and 372 on placebo [18]; 2,429 children and adolescents in 10 studies [3].
- Sources
- [17], [21], [18], [3]
- Caveats
- Short trials of 3 to 12 weeks.
Dry mouth, headache, stomach ache and anxiety
Shown to cause dry mouth in 35% of adults against 5% on placebo, with headache, stomach ache, nausea and anxiety also more frequent than placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In adults on extended-release mixed amphetamine salts: dry mouth 35% vs 5% on placebo, headache 26% vs 13%, nausea 8% vs 3%, anxiety 8% vs 5% and dizziness 7% vs 0. In children: abdominal pain 14% vs 10%, emotional lability 9% vs 2% and vomiting 7% vs 4%. In the adult trial, 12.0% on the drug and 1.6% on placebo stopped because of adverse events [17]. In adults on extended-release methylphenidate: headache 22% vs 16%, dry mouth 14% vs 4%, nausea 13% vs 3% and anxiety 8% vs 2% [21]. On lisdexamfetamine in binge eating disorder, dry mouth was 36% vs 7% and feeling jittery 6% vs 1% [18]. Pooled across trials, any adverse event was more frequent on methylphenidate than placebo in children (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.37) and adults (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.37), and adults on amphetamines withdrew for adverse events more often (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.63 to 4.45) [2][5][4].
- Population
- Children, adolescents and adults in label trials [17][21][18]; 5,342 children in 35 trials [2]; 4,214 adults in 14 trials [5]; 2,409 adults in 17 studies [4].
- Sources
- [17], [21], [18], [2], [5], [4]
- Caveats
- Serious adverse events did not differ from placebo in the pooled methylphenidate trials in children (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.67) or adults (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.43), with very low certainty [2][5].
Dry mouth, drowsiness and other side effects
Shown to raise side effects such as dry mouth, drowsiness and dizziness, with any adverse event in 55% to 78% on amitriptyline against 36% to 47% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In depression trials, amitriptyline caused more anticholinergic side effects, fast heart rate, dizziness, nervousness, sedation, tremor, indigestion and sexual dysfunction than placebo, and more people left for side effects (OR 4.15) [1]. In nerve pain trials, at least one adverse event occurred in 55% against 36% [3], and in fibromyalgia trials in 78% against 47% [6]. In the children's migraine trial, fatigue occurred in 30% against 14% and dry mouth in 25% against 12% [8].
- Population
- 3,509 adults in depression trials [1]; 1,342 adults with nerve pain [3]; 649 adults with fibromyalgia [6]; 361 children and adolescents [8].
- Sources
- [1], [3], [6], [8]
- Caveats
- The pain trials used lower doses than depression trials and were small.
Sleepiness
Shown to cause sleepiness in 57% on quetiapine against 15% on placebo in bipolar depression trials, and in 18% against 11% in schizophrenia trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- On quetiapine, somnolence was reported by 57% against 15% on placebo in bipolar depression trials, 18% against 11% in schizophrenia trials, 16% against 4% in mania trials and 34% against 9% when added to lithium or divalproex for mania [3]. On aripiprazole, sedation was reported by 7% against 4% in one pooled adult table and 8% against 3% in another [10]. In maintenance trials across antipsychotics, sedation affected 13% against 9% on placebo [4].
- Population
- 698 people on quetiapine and 347 on placebo in bipolar depression trials, and 510 and 206 in schizophrenia trials [3]; adults in aripiprazole label trials [10]; 6,493 patients in 65 trials [4].
- Sources
- [3], [10], [4]
- Caveats
- Sleepiness was far more frequent on quetiapine than on aripiprazole in these label tables, which come from separate trials and were not compared head to head.
Restlessness and movement side effects
Shown to cause restlessness in 25% on aripiprazole against 4% on placebo when added to an antidepressant, and in 8% against 4% in schizophrenia trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- On aripiprazole, akathisia-related events were reported by 25% against 4% on placebo as an add-on in depression, and by 8% against 4% in adult schizophrenia trials. Other movement events occurred in 13% against 12% in schizophrenia trials [10]. On quetiapine in bipolar depression trials, akathisia was reported by 4% against 1% and extrapyramidal disorder by 3% against 1% [3]. In maintenance trials across antipsychotics, movement disorders affected 16% against 9% on placebo [4]. A review of off-label use named akathisia as an adverse event of aripiprazole in adults under 65 [12].
- Population
- Adults in aripiprazole and quetiapine label trials [10][3]; 6,493 patients in 65 trials [4].
- Sources
- [10], [3], [4], [12]
- Caveats
- The band above is the akathisia rate on aripiprazole as an add-on in depression. Rates on quetiapine were lower.
Memory and thinking
Shown to impair memory in trials, in 33% on alprazolam against 22% on placebo, and linked to poorer cognition in long-term users.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In alprazolam panic trials, memory impairment was reported by 33% against 22% on placebo, and cognitive disorder by 29% against 21% [18]. In people over 60 taking sedatives for sleep, adverse cognitive events were 4.78 times as frequent as on placebo (95% CI 1.47 to 15.47) [12]. Long-term users performed worse than controls in every cognitive domain tested, with a mean weighted effect size of -0.74 [23]. An updated meta-analysis found deficits in working memory, processing speed, divided attention and recent memory in current users, and deficits that remained in people who had stopped [24].
- Population
- 1,388 adults on alprazolam and 1,231 on placebo [18]; 2,417 people aged 60 and older in 24 studies [12]; long-term users with a mean of 9.9 years of use compared with controls [23]; studies of current and former long-term users [24].
- Sources
- [18], [12], [23], [24]
- Caveats
- The long-term comparisons are not randomized, so differences between users and controls may reflect the conditions being treated. The studies were small [23].
Dizziness, nausea and headache
Shown to raise dizziness, in 12% against 3% on placebo across 17 trials, along with nausea, headache and nervousness.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In pooled data from 17 four-week trials: dizziness 12% vs 3% on placebo, nausea 8% vs 5%, headache 6% vs 3%, nervousness 5% vs 1% and lightheadedness 3% vs under 1%. About 10% of 2,200 patients in premarketing anxiety trials stopped for an adverse event [4]. A meta-analysis of 13 trials found higher odds than placebo of dizziness (OR 4.66, 95% CI 2.07 to 10.47), constipation (OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.34 to 12.55) and gastric distress (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.78) [16]. A second found more nausea and dizziness than placebo [1].
- Population
- 477 patients on buspirone and 464 on placebo in 17 trials [4]; 13 randomized trials reporting side effects [16]; 70 studies of azapirones [1].
- Sources
- [4], [16], [1]
- Caveats
- The label trials lasted 4 weeks.
Dizziness and sleepiness
Shown to cause dizziness in 28% to 30% against 8% on placebo, and sleepiness in 21% to 23% against 5% to 8%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In postherpetic neuralgia trials of gabapentin, dizziness was reported by 28% against 8% on placebo and sleepiness by 21% against 5%. In epilepsy trials it was sleepiness 19% against 9%, dizziness 17% against 7% and unsteadiness 13% against 6%. The label states that driving studies with a gabapentin prodrug indicate gabapentin may cause significant driving impairment [19]. In pregabalin trials, dizziness was reported by 30% against 8% and sleepiness by 23% against 8%, more often at higher doses, and each led 4% to stop [7]. In the Cochrane review of pregabalin for postherpetic neuralgia, dizziness affected 29% on 300 mg and 35% on 600 mg against 8% to 9% on placebo [2]. In postherpetic neuralgia trials, 16% on gabapentin and 9% on placebo stopped because of an adverse reaction [19].
- Population
- 336 people on gabapentin and 227 on placebo in two postherpetic neuralgia trials, and people over 12 in epilepsy trials [19]; adults in pregabalin controlled trials [7]; 45 studies with 11,906 participants [2].
- Sources
- [19], [7], [2]
- Caveats
- Among people who reported these effects in short pregabalin trials, dizziness lasted to the final dose in 30% and sleepiness in 42% [7].
Severe low blood sugar in type 1 diabetes
Shown to cause severe low blood sugar in about 6% to 17% of adults with type 1 diabetes within 28 weeks, two to three times more often under intensive treatment.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Intensive insulin treatment raised severe hypoglycemia two to threefold against conventional treatment [1]. A Cochrane review also found a higher risk under intensive control, clearest in the largest trial [2]. In adult label trials of glargine, severe symptomatic hypoglycemia occurred in 6.5% to 10.6% on glargine and 5.2% to 15.0% on NPH insulin over 16 to 28 weeks, and in children in 23.0% against 28.6% over 26 weeks [5]. On insulin aspart by injection it occurred in 17% of adults and 6% of children at 24 weeks [19]. Pooled across trials, 10.2% on glargine and 12.5% on NPH had a severe episode [11].
- Population
- 1,441 people in the complications trial [1]; 12 trials [2]; 1,738 adults and 349 children in four label trials [5]; 2,350 participants in 9 trials [11].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [5], [19], [11]
- Caveats
- There is no placebo group in type 1 diabetes, so rates are compared between insulins or treatment intensities. Rates depend on how severe hypoglycemia was defined [19].
Sleepiness
Shown to cause sleepiness in 54% against 18% on placebo in 6-week depression trials, leading 10.4% to stop against 2.2%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In US controlled trials, somnolence was reported by 54% on mirtazapine and 18% on placebo, and led to discontinuation in 10.4% against 2.2%. The label states it is unclear whether tolerance develops [7]. In a network meta-analysis of on-road driving trials in healthy subjects, mirtazapine 15 to 30 mg at bedtime produced significantly more lane weaving the next morning than placebo after a single dose [14]. Mirtazapine caused more somnolence than SSRIs in depression trials [2], and more sedation than placebo before surgery (RR 22.47, 95% CI 5.61 to 89.93) [8].
- Population
- 453 adults on mirtazapine and 361 on placebo [7]; 22 crossover trials of sleep-related medicines in healthy subjects [14]; 4,974 participants in 29 trials [2].
- Sources
- [7], [14], [2], [8]
- Caveats
- Confidence in the driving evidence was rated low to very low, and repeated dosing caused fewer residual effects than a single dose [14].
Drowsiness, dry mouth and dizziness
Shown to raise drowsiness, reported by 29% to 38% on cyclobenzaprine against 10% on placebo and by 48% on tizanidine against 10%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In the label's controlled trials, drowsiness was reported by 29% on cyclobenzaprine 5 mg, 38% on 10 mg and 10% on placebo, and dry mouth by 21%, 32% and 7% [10]. On tizanidine, sleepiness was reported by 48% against 10% on placebo, dry mouth by 49% against 10%, weakness or tiredness by 41% against 16% and dizziness by 16% against 4% [12]. In one controlled study of baclofen, drowsiness was reported by 63% against 36% on placebo, and the label gives dizziness and weakness at 5% to 15% each [14]. Pooled across low back pain trials, adverse events were about 1.5 to 1.6 times as frequent as on control, and central nervous system effects twice as frequent (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.37) [1][2].
- Population
- 713 people on cyclobenzaprine and 469 on placebo [10]; 264 on tizanidine and 261 on placebo [12]; 175 people in the baclofen study [14]; pooled low back pain trials [1][2].
- Sources
- [10], [12], [14], [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The methocarbamol label lists drowsiness and dizziness and gives no rates [15]. The cyclobenzaprine label states that adverse events are more frequent and more severe in older adults [10].
Headache
Shown to raise headache against placebo, in 24% against 13% with chemotherapy and 9% against 5% after surgery.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Headache occurred in 24% on ondansetron 8 mg twice daily and 13% on placebo in chemotherapy trials, in 11% on a single 24 mg dose with cisplatin, and in 9% against 5% in surgery trials [3]. In a Cochrane review of drugs for postoperative nausea, headache was more common after ondansetron (RR 1.16) [2].
- Population
- 242 adults on ondansetron and 262 on placebo with chemotherapy, 550 and 531 having surgery [3]; 737 studies [2].
- Sources
- [3], [2]
- Caveats
- The label notes a causal link was unclear for many reactions because patients took several drugs [3].
346 more
Constipation, nausea, drowsiness and other common effects
Shown to raise side effects, with any adverse event in 22% against 15% on placebo in osteoarthritis trials and vomiting in 5.9% against 2.3%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- An overview of 14 Cochrane reviews found opioids raised the risk of any adverse event against placebo (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.66) and of a serious adverse event (RR 2.75, 95% CI 2.06 to 3.67), with constipation, dizziness, drowsiness, fatigue, hot flushes, sweating, nausea, itching and vomiting each more frequent [22]. In osteoarthritis trials, any adverse event was reported by 22% on opioids and 15% on control (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.63) [9]. In chronic pain trials that excluded people with adverse events during a run-in, vomiting occurred in 5.9% against 2.3% [6]. In tramadol trials in chronic pain, the label reports constipation in 24% within 7 days and 46% within 90 days, nausea in 24% and 40%, and dizziness in 26% and 33% [16].
- Population
- 18,679 participants in 61 studies lasting 2 weeks to 13 months [22]; 8,275 people in 22 osteoarthritis trials [9]; 26,169 participants in 96 trials [6]; 427 people in tramadol trials [16].
- Sources
- [22], [9], [6], [16]
- Caveats
- The tramadol label figures have no placebo comparison. None of the Cochrane reviews reported addiction, hormone effects, breathing depression or sleep apnea [22].
Tingling, altered taste, dry mouth and attention problems
Shown to raise tingling, altered taste and dry mouth on phentermine-topiramate, each in about 10 to 21% at the top dose against 1 to 2% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In CONQUER, dry mouth occurred in 2%, 13% and 21% on placebo, 7.5/46 mg and 15/92 mg. Paresthesia (tingling) occurred in 2%, 14% and 21%, altered taste in 1%, 7% and 10%, and insomnia in 5%, 6% and 10% [1]. Pooled against placebo, odds were 8.86 for altered taste, 8.51 for paresthesia, 6.71 for dry mouth, 4.48 for disturbance in attention and 4.10 for irritability [4]. Odds of stopping for adverse events were 2.40 (95% CI 1.68 to 3.44) times those on lifestyle change alone [3].
- Population
- Trial participants in [1], [3] and [4].
- Sources
- [1], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Most of these effects are attributed to the topiramate component.
Insomnia and drowsiness
Shown to raise both insomnia and drowsiness against placebo, with insomnia in 18% on venlafaxine against 10% and drowsiness in 15% against 8%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In pooled venlafaxine extended release trials, insomnia occurred in 17.8% vs 9.5% on placebo, somnolence in 15.3% vs 7.5% and abnormal dreams in 2.9% vs 1.4% [10]. In pooled duloxetine trials, somnolence occurred in 10% vs 3% and insomnia in 9% vs 5% [18]. A network meta-analysis of 216 trials found 13 of 21 antidepressants had higher odds of somnolence than placebo and 11 had higher odds of insomnia [27]. An earlier meta-analysis found the highest incidence of insomnia with bupropion and desvenlafaxine [28].
- Population
- Adults in pooled label trials [10][18]; 64,696 patients with depression in 216 trials [27]; trials of second-generation antidepressants in depression [28].
- Sources
- [10], [18], [27], [28]
- Caveats
- The two meta-analyses cover all newer antidepressants. Evidence quality was rated very low to moderate [27].
Symptoms after stopping
Shown to cause discontinuation symptoms in about 31% of people stopping an antidepressant against 17% stopping placebo, with venlafaxine and desvenlafaxine among the most frequent.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- At least one discontinuation symptom occurred in 31% (95% CI 27 to 35) after stopping an antidepressant and 17% (95% CI 14 to 21) after stopping placebo, a difference of 8 percentage points within randomized trials. Severe symptoms occurred in 2.8% vs 0.6%. Desvenlafaxine and venlafaxine were among the drugs with higher frequency and higher severity [29]. A second meta-analysis found about one more symptom in the first week after stopping (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.39), with dizziness the most frequent (OR 5.52, risk difference 6.24%) [30]. A systematic review of 61 SNRI reports found withdrawal symptoms after every SNRI, a prevalence that varied between reports and appeared higher with venlafaxine, onset within a few days, and a course of a few weeks, including after gradual tapering [31]. The venlafaxine label states that symptom frequency rose with dose and with length of treatment [10]. The desvenlafaxine label reports postmarketing cases that were protracted and severe [9].
- Population
- 21,002 patients in 79 studies [29]; 17,828 participants in 50 studies [30]; 22 randomized trials, 16 other studies and 23 case reports of SNRIs [31].
- Sources
- [29], [30], [31], [10], [9]
- Caveats
- The pooled rates combine SNRIs with other antidepressants, and heterogeneity was substantial [29]. The SNRI review gives no pooled rate [31].
Insomnia and drowsiness
Shown to raise both insomnia and drowsiness against placebo, with insomnia in 20% on sertraline against 13% and drowsiness in 11% against 6%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In pooled sertraline trials, insomnia occurred in 20% vs 13% on placebo and somnolence in 11% vs 6% [24]. In fluoxetine depression trials, insomnia occurred in 16% vs 9% and somnolence in 13% vs 6% [26]. In escitalopram anxiety trials, somnolence occurred in 13% vs 7% and insomnia in 12% vs 6% [25]. A network meta-analysis of 216 trials found 13 of 21 antidepressants had higher odds of somnolence than placebo and 11 had higher odds of insomnia [33]. An earlier meta-analysis found 10 second-generation antidepressants with more insomnia than placebo and 11 with more somnolence [34].
- Population
- Adults in placebo-controlled label trials [24][26][25]; 64,696 patients with depression in 216 trials [33]; trials of second-generation antidepressants in depression [34].
- Sources
- [24], [26], [25], [33], [34]
- Caveats
- The two meta-analyses cover all newer antidepressants, and the highest somnolence odds were for fluvoxamine, which is outside this page [33][34]. Evidence quality was rated very low to moderate [33].
Symptoms after stopping
Shown to cause discontinuation symptoms in about 31% of people stopping an antidepressant against 17% stopping placebo, with severe symptoms in about 3%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- At least one discontinuation symptom occurred in 31% (95% CI 27 to 35) after stopping an antidepressant and 17% (95% CI 14 to 21) after stopping placebo. Within randomized trials the difference was 8 percentage points (95% CI 4 to 12). Severe symptoms occurred in 2.8% vs 0.6%. Escitalopram was among the drugs with higher frequency, and paroxetine among those with higher severity [37]. A second meta-analysis found about one more symptom on a discontinuation symptom checklist in the first week after stopping (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.39), with higher odds of dizziness (OR 5.52, risk difference 6.24%), nausea (OR 3.16) and nervousness (OR 3.15) than after stopping placebo [38]. The label lists nausea, sweating, dizziness, electric shock sensations, irritability, anxiety, insomnia and tinnitus among the symptoms [24].
- Population
- 21,002 patients in 44 RCTs and 35 observational studies, 16,532 stopping an antidepressant [37]; 17,828 participants in 50 studies followed 1 day to 52 weeks [38].
- Sources
- [37], [38], [24], [39]
- Caveats
- Estimates vary widely. An earlier review that included surveys reported a weighted average of 56% (range 27% to 86%), with 46% of those affected choosing the most severe rating, and symptoms lasting weeks to months in some studies [39]. Heterogeneity was substantial [37]. Both meta-analyses pooled SSRIs with other antidepressants.
Low blood sugar
Shown to raise low blood sugar events, affecting 37.7% on glimepiride against 10.6% on linagliptin over six years. Severe episodes occurred in about 2%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Sulfonylureas raised hypoglycemic events against comparators (RR 2.41, 95% CI 1.41 to 4.10) [1]. As monotherapy against metformin the odds were about three times higher (OR 3.13, 95% CI 2.39 to 4.12, risk difference 10%) [8]. Added to metformin, sulfonylureas and glinides had higher rates than placebo (RR range 4.57 to 7.50) [2]. Over a median 6.3 years, at least one episode occurred in 37.7% on glimepiride and 10.6% on linagliptin [5], and over a median 57.3 months in 34% on sulfonylureas and 10% on pioglitazone [6]. In a 22-week label trial, possible hypoglycemia was reported by 19.7% on glimepiride and 3.2% on placebo [3]. On extended-release glipizide, 3.4% had hypoglycemia and none on placebo [13]. Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 2.2% on glimepiride over a mean 5.0 years, against 1.3% on glargine, 1.0% on liraglutide and 0.7% on sitagliptin [10]. Glyburide carried a higher risk than other sulfonylureas (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.49) [15].
- Population
- 31 trials [1]; 301 trials [8]; 27 trials [2]; 6,033 adults [5]; 3,028 patients [6]; 249 adults in the glimepiride trial [3]; 580 people on extended-release glipizide [13]; 5,047 participants [10]; trials comparing glyburide with other secretagogues [15].
- Sources
- [1], [8], [2], [5], [6], [3], [13], [10], [15]
- Caveats
- Definitions of hypoglycemia differed between trials, and some counted symptoms without a glucose reading [3]. The glyburide label names older, debilitated or malnourished people and those with kidney or liver impairment as particularly susceptible [14].
Misuse and use disorder in surveys
Linked to misuse by about 5 million of the 16 million US adults who used prescription stimulants in a year, with 0.4 million meeting criteria for a use disorder.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In a national survey, 6.6% of US adults used prescription stimulants in the past year: 4.5% used without misuse, 1.9% misused without a use disorder and 0.2% had a use disorder. That equals about 16.0 million users, 5.0 million who misused and 0.4 million with a use disorder. The most common reason for misuse was to stay alert or concentrate (56.3%), and the most common source was a friend or relative at no cost (56.9%) [22]. A systematic review of 111 studies found self-reported rates of nonmedical use from 2.1% to 58.7% across population samples. Most nonmedical use had no or minor medical effects, while adverse outcomes including death occurred in some people, particularly with non-oral routes [16].
- Population
- US adults in a national household survey [22]; 111 studies, most in college students [16].
- Sources
- [22], [16]
- Caveats
- Misuse in the survey includes taking pills prescribed to someone else, so the band above is misuse among everyone who used a stimulant, not among people prescribed one. Definitions of nonmedical use varied widely across studies [16].
Dizziness and low blood pressure on standing
Shown to raise dizziness and low blood pressure on standing in label trials, with dizziness in 15% on tamsulosin 0.4 mg against 10% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Dizziness was reported by 14.9% on tamsulosin 0.4 mg, 17.1% on 0.8 mg and 10.1% on placebo, and at least one positive orthostatic test by 16%, 19% and 11% [4]. Dizziness was 15.6% on doxazosin against 9.0% on placebo in BPH trials and 19% against 9% in hypertension trials [7]. On terazosin it was 9.1% against 4.2%, and postural hypotension 3.9% against 0.8% [19]. On alfuzosin dizziness was 5.7% against 2.8% [6], and on silodosin 3.2% against 1.1%, with orthostatic hypotension 2.6% against 1.5% [5]. In chronic prostatitis trials, adverse events such as dizziness and postural hypotension were more frequent than on placebo (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.34) [15].
- Population
- 1,487 men in two US tamsulosin trials [4]; 965 BPH and 675 hypertension patients in doxazosin trials [7]; 996 men in terazosin BPH trials [19]; 1,151 men in alfuzosin trials [6]; 923 men in silodosin trials [5]; 1,588 men in prostatitis trials [15].
- Sources
- [4], [7], [19], [6], [5], [15]
- Caveats
- Rates differ by drug and trial, and cross-trial comparisons between drugs are not reliable.
Sleepiness, tiredness and insomnia
Shown to cause sleepiness in 16% of children on viloxazine against 4%, and 11% on atomoxetine against 4%. Adults more often reported insomnia.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In children, sleepiness occurred in 16% on viloxazine against 4% on placebo [6] and 11% on atomoxetine against 4%, with fatigue in 8% against 3% [9]. In adults, insomnia occurred in 15% on atomoxetine against 8% [9] and 23% on viloxazine against 7%, with fatigue in 12% against 3% [6]. A meta-analysis of viloxazine found sleepiness significantly more frequent than placebo [4].
- Population
- Label trials in children and adults [9][6]; 1,605 patients in 5 viloxazine trials [4].
- Sources
- [6], [9], [4]
- Caveats
- Sleepiness may lessen with time, which short trials do not show.
Tardive dyskinesia
Linked to tardive dyskinesia in 20.7% of people on second-generation antipsychotics across studies, against 30.0% on first-generation drugs and 7.2% with no earlier first-generation exposure.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 41 studies, the prevalence of tardive dyskinesia was 20.7% during current second-generation treatment (95% CI 16.6 to 25.4) and 30.0% during first-generation treatment (95% CI 26.4 to 33.8). In four studies of people never exposed to first-generation drugs, it was 7.2% [18]. Both labels warn that this syndrome of involuntary movements may be irreversible [3][10].
- Population
- 11,493 people in 41 studies, mean age 42.8, 77% with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders [18].
- Sources
- [18], [3], [10]
- Caveats
- Prevalence in people treated long term, mostly for schizophrenia, with no placebo group. Many on second-generation drugs had earlier first-generation exposure, and prevalence rose with age and length of illness.
Symptoms after stopping
Shown to cause one or more discontinuation symptoms in 12.1% after abruptly stopping extended-release quetiapine, against 6.7% after stopping placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In short-term trials with a discontinuation phase, one or more symptoms after abrupt stopping were reported by 12.1% (241 of 1,993) on extended-release quetiapine and 6.7% (71 of 1,065) on placebo. The label names insomnia, nausea and vomiting as acute withdrawal symptoms described after abrupt cessation of atypical antipsychotics [3].
- Population
- 1,993 people stopping extended-release quetiapine and 1,065 stopping placebo [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for quetiapine after short-term use. No study of misuse or dependence was sourced for this page.
FDA boxed warning: dependence and withdrawal
FDA states continued use may lead to physical dependence, and abrupt stopping may bring life-threatening withdrawal. One study found withdrawal reactions in 58% to 100% of long-term users.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The boxed warning states that the risks of dependence and withdrawal rise with longer treatment and higher daily dose, and that abrupt discontinuation or rapid dose reduction may precipitate acute withdrawal reactions, including seizures. The label also describes a protracted withdrawal syndrome lasting weeks to more than 12 months [18]. When long-term users were switched blind to placebo, 58% to 100% were judged to have a withdrawal reaction, depending on the criteria used, peaking at 2 days for short half-life drugs and 4 to 7 days for long half-life drugs [19]. FDA wrote that physical dependence can occur after several days to weeks of steady use, even as prescribed. In its series of 104 reports, about 80% described withdrawal, with symptoms lasting from weeks to years [22].
- Population
- 57 people who had taken a benzodiazepine daily for more than a year, 47 switched to placebo [19]; 104 reports to FDA from 1968 to 2019 [22].
- Sources
- [18], [19], [22]
- Caveats
- The discontinuation study stopped the drug abruptly in people who had used it for over a year, so the band above applies to that setting. FDA described epidemiologic data on dependence and withdrawal as scarce, and no systematic review giving a pooled withdrawal rate was located. Withdrawal symptoms can be hard to tell from the return of the original condition [22].
Drowsiness and poor coordination
Shown to cause drowsiness, in 41% on alprazolam against 22% on placebo in anxiety trials, and impaired coordination in 40% against 18% in panic trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In alprazolam anxiety trials, drowsiness occurred in 41% against 22% on placebo. In its panic disorder trials, at higher doses, drowsiness occurred in 77% against 43%, impaired coordination in 40% against 18% and slurred speech in 23% against 6% [18]. In clonazepam panic trials, somnolence occurred in 37% against 10% and ataxia in 5% against 0 [3]. Among about 3,500 people treated with lorazepam, sedation was reported by 15.9%, dizziness by 6.9% and unsteadiness by 3.4%, rising with age [7]. In insomnia trials, daytime drowsiness and dizziness were more frequent than on placebo (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4) [9].
- Population
- 565 adults on alprazolam and 505 on placebo in anxiety trials, 1,388 and 1,231 in panic trials [18]; 574 on clonazepam and 294 on placebo [3]; about 3,500 patients on lorazepam [7]; trials of benzodiazepines for insomnia [9].
- Sources
- [18], [3], [7], [9]
- Caveats
- The lorazepam figures have no placebo comparison. The labels state that these effects are dose dependent.
Nausea, flushing and headache
Shown to raise nausea to 40% against 1.3% on placebo, along with flushing, headache and vomiting. Most events were mild to moderate and passed.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In the controlled trials, nausea occurred in 40.0% on bremelanotide and 1.3% on placebo, flushing in 20.3% against 0.3%, injection site reactions in 13.2% against 8.4%, headache in 11.3% against 1.9%, and vomiting in 4.8% against 0.2%. Nausea needed anti-nausea medication in 13% [2]. In the 52-week open-label extension, drug-related nausea occurred in 40.4%, flushing in 20.6% and headache in 12.0% [4].
- Population
- 627 women on bremelanotide and 620 on placebo [2]; 684 women in the extension [4].
- Sources
- [2], [4]
- Caveats
- The label reports most events as mild to moderate and transient, and nausea improved for most people with the second dose [2]. The extension had no comparison group [4].
Insomnia
Shown to raise insomnia, in 11% to 16% against 6% on placebo in depression trials. Drowsiness was no more frequent than on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In depression trials of the sustained-release form, insomnia occurred in 11% at 300 mg a day and 16% at 400 mg a day against 6% on placebo, and somnolence in 2% and 3% against 2% [15]. In seasonal depression trials, insomnia occurred in 20% against 13% on placebo [8]. In a smoking cessation trial, insomnia was the most frequent adverse event on bupropion, at 12% [6]. A meta-analysis of second-generation antidepressants found the highest incidence of insomnia with bupropion and desvenlafaxine, and less somnolence on bupropion than on placebo [21].
- Population
- 490 adults on sustained-release bupropion and 385 on placebo [15]; 537 on extended-release bupropion and 511 on placebo [8]; 2,006 smokers assigned to bupropion [6]; trials of second-generation antidepressants in depression [21].
- Sources
- [15], [8], [6], [21]
- Caveats
- Short-term trials. The rate rose with dose [15].
Dry mouth, nausea and other common side effects
Shown to raise dry mouth, nausea, dizziness, tremor, sweating and ringing in the ears against placebo, with dry mouth in 17% to 24% against 7%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In depression trials at 300 and 400 mg a day against placebo: dry mouth 17% and 24% vs 7%, nausea 13% and 18% vs 8%, dizziness 7% and 11% vs 5%, tremor 6% and 3% vs 1%, sweating 6% and 5% vs 2%, tinnitus 6% and 6% vs 2%, anxiety 5% and 6% vs 3% and agitation 3% and 9% vs 2% [15]. In smoking cessation trials, more people dropped out for adverse events on bupropion than on placebo (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.65) [4]. In veterans with depression, anxiety was reported by 22.5% to 24.3% in the bupropion groups against 16.6% on added aripiprazole [10].
- Population
- 490 adults on sustained-release bupropion and 385 on placebo [15]; 12,346 participants in 25 smoking cessation studies [4]; 1,522 veterans [10].
- Sources
- [15], [4], [10]
- Caveats
- Short-term trials. Several effects were more frequent at 400 mg than at 300 mg a day [15].
Other adverse events in trials
Shown to raise diarrhea, vomiting, fatigue, sleepiness and loss of appetite in seizure trials, with 14% against 1% withdrawing for side effects.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In the Lennox-Gastaut trial, adverse events occurred in 86% on CBD and 69% on placebo, and 14% vs 1% withdrew because of them [3]. Diarrhea, vomiting, fatigue, fever, somnolence and decreased appetite were more frequent with CBD [1][3].
- Population
- Patients with Dravet or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome [1][3]. Healthy adults [15].
- Sources
- [1], [3], [15]
- Caveats
- These patients took several other antiepileptic drugs. In 4 RCTs of 269 healthy adults, diarrhea was more likely on CBD than placebo (RR 5.85, 95% CI 1.14 to 30.02). Headache, abdominal pain, fatigue and dizziness did not differ significantly [15].
Drowsiness and fatigue
Shown to raise drowsiness, in 38% on guanfacine against 11% on placebo and 31% to 38% on extended-release clonidine against 4%, with about 4 treated for one extra case.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In ADHD trials, somnolence occurred in 38% on 0.2 mg and 31% on 0.4 mg extended-release clonidine against 4% on placebo, and fatigue in 16% and 13% against 1% [6]. On guanfacine, somnolence occurred in 38% across doses against 11%, rising from 28% at 1 mg to 51% at 4 mg, and fatigue in 14% against 3% [7]. A meta-analysis found numbers needed to harm of 4 for somnolence, 10 for fatigue and 17 for sedation [5]. The clonidine tablet label reports drowsiness in about 33 of 100 people [13].
- Population
- 230 children and adolescents in a fixed-dose clonidine trial [6]; 513 on guanfacine and 149 on placebo [7]; 2,276 young people in 12 trials [5].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [5], [13]
- Caveats
- Somnolence led to stopping in 11% at the highest guanfacine dose [7].
Dropping out of treatment for PTSD
Shown in placebo-controlled PTSD trials, where 29.0% left CBT against 17.2% on placebo. No difference in dropout appeared for other anxiety disorders.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In PTSD studies, dropout rates were 29.0% with CBT and 17.2% with placebo. No difference in dropout was found across the other disorders [6].
- Population
- Patients with PTSD among 41 placebo-controlled trials [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Dropout is not a measure of harm, and the abstract does not give reasons for leaving [6].
Insomnia, jitteriness and gut upset
Shown to raise the odds of insomnia fivefold and jitteriness 3.5-fold against controls, in pooled studies, with insomnia reported by about a quarter of adult drinkers.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Energy drinks raised the odds of insomnia (OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.72 to 14.63) and jitteriness or activeness (OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.28 to 9.67) against control groups. In adults the most reported adverse events were jitteriness, restlessness or shaking hands (29.8%), insomnia (24.7%) and gut upset (21.6%). In children they were insomnia (35.4%), stress (35.4%) and depressed mood (23.1%) [11].
- Population
- 96,549 people in 32 clinical studies [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The percentages are shares of drinkers reporting each event, without a matched control rate for each [11].
Drowsiness
Shown to cause sleepiness in 28% against 14% on placebo in a 4-week anxiety trial, appearing in the first week and fading with continued use.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- At 50 mg a day, sleepiness was reported by 28% on hydroxyzine and 14% on placebo. It appeared in the first week and progressively disappeared later in treatment [4]. In the Cochrane review, sleepiness or drowsiness was more frequent on hydroxyzine than on benzodiazepines or buspirone, without reaching significance (OR 1.74, 95% CI 0.86 to 3.53) [1]. The label states that drowsiness is usually transitory and may disappear within a few days or on a lower dose [5].
- Population
- 133 patients with generalized anxiety disorder [4]; 884 participants in 5 studies [1].
- Sources
- [4], [1], [5]
- Caveats
- The rate comes from one trial at 50 mg a day, below the label's dose range for anxiety.
Upper airway infections and headache
Shown in label trials to raise upper respiratory infections and headache against placebo, with upper respiratory infections in 21% to 27% on fluticasone-salmeterol against 14%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 12-week asthma trials, rates on fluticasone-salmeterol 100/50 and 250/50 against placebo were upper respiratory tract infection 27% and 21% against 14%, pharyngitis 13% and 10% against 6%, headache 12% and 13% against 7%, and nausea and vomiting 4% and 6% against 1% [15].
- Population
- 705 adults and adolescents with asthma in two US trials [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- Average exposure was 60 to 79 days on active drugs and 42 days on placebo, so placebo rates may be lower partly from shorter exposure [15].
FDA boxed warning: sedation, dissociation and breathing
FDA states esketamine causes sedation in 48% to 61% and dissociation in 61% to 84% of patients, and respiratory depression after approval, requiring 2 hours of observation.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The boxed warning covers sedation, dissociation, respiratory depression, abuse and misuse, and suicidal thoughts in young people. In trials, 48% to 61% developed sedation on an observer scale and 0.3% to 0.4% lost consciousness. 61% to 84% developed dissociative or perceptual changes on a clinician scale. Adverse-event reports of dissociation were 41% against 9% on placebo, and sedation 23% against 9%. Respiratory depression and rare respiratory arrest were reported after approval. Patients must be watched by a healthcare provider for at least 2 hours, with pulse oximetry [4].
- Population
- 346 adults on esketamine with an oral antidepressant and 222 on placebo spray, within 1,709 adults in safety studies [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Rates are for esketamine. Racemic ketamine trials report dissociation as well [6].
Dizziness, nausea and vertigo
Shown to raise dizziness to 29% against 8%, nausea to 28% against 9%, and vertigo to 23% against 3% in esketamine trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- On esketamine with an oral antidepressant, dizziness occurred in 29% vs 8% on placebo, nausea 28% vs 9%, vertigo 23% vs 3%, numbness 18% vs 2%, anxiety 13% vs 6%, vomiting 9% vs 2% and feeling drunk 5% vs 0.5%. 4.6% of adults under 65 stopped for adverse reactions against 1.4% on placebo [4].
- Population
- 346 on esketamine and 222 on placebo [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Effects mostly occur on treatment days.
Dizziness, double vision, unsteadiness, nausea and sleepiness in epilepsy trials
Shown to raise dizziness, double vision, unsteadiness and nausea when added to other seizure drugs, with dizziness in 38% against 13% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In pooled add-on epilepsy trials, dizziness occurred in 38% on lamotrigine and 13% on placebo, headache 29% and 19%, double vision 28% and 7%, unsteadiness (ataxia) 22% and 6%, nausea 19% and 10%, blurred vision 16% and 5%, sleepiness 14% and 7%, and vomiting 9% and 4%. Dizziness, double vision, ataxia, blurred vision, nausea and vomiting rose with dose [4]. In a Cochrane review the risk ratios were 3.34 for ataxia, 1.76 for dizziness, 1.81 for nausea and 3.79 for double vision, with no difference in fatigue (RR 0.82) [7].
- Population
- 711 adults on lamotrigine and 419 on placebo, added to 1 to 3 other seizure drugs [4]; 14 trials with 1,806 participants [7].
- Sources
- [4], [7]
- Caveats
- These trials added lamotrigine to other seizure drugs, which raises these effects. Rates were lower in the bipolar trials, where it was taken alone [4].
Side effects in bipolar trials
Shown to raise nausea, insomnia, fatigue and back pain slightly in bipolar trials, with nausea in 14% against 11% on placebo. Overall adverse effects matched placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In two 18-month bipolar trials, nausea occurred in 14% on lamotrigine and 11% on placebo, insomnia 10% and 6%, sleepiness 9% and 7%, back pain 8% and 6%, fatigue 8% and 5%, and dry mouth 6% and 4%. 13% stopped lamotrigine for an adverse reaction, against 16% on placebo and 23% on lithium [4]. A Cochrane review found the share with any adverse effect similar to placebo over 6 to 12 months (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.23) [1].
- Population
- 227 adults on lamotrigine, 190 on placebo and 166 on lithium [4]; 756 participants in 4 studies [1].
- Sources
- [4], [1]
- Caveats
- During the open-label dose escalation, before randomization, headache (25%), rash (11%) and dizziness (10%) were more frequent [4].
Adverse events in trials
Shown to raise vivid dreams about 2.4 times over placebo, with adverse events overall 1.4 times as frequent. Serious adverse events did not differ.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Vivid dreams were more common on LDN than placebo (RR 2.41, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.28), and headache did not differ [2]. Another meta-analysis found more vivid dreams and nausea, with no difference in serious adverse events, headache, diarrhea or dizziness [1]. Across chronic pain trials, adverse events were 1.4 times as frequent as on placebo (IRR 1.4, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.75) [6]. In the 12-month trial, adverse events occurred in 68.8% on LDN and 72% on placebo, with no treatment-related serious events [5]. In Crohn's disease, withdrawals and specific adverse events did not differ [9].
- Population
- Trial participants with fibromyalgia, chronic pain, Crohn's disease [1][2][5][6][9].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [5], [6], [9]
- Caveats
- Most trials were small and lasted under 4 months.
Dry mouth, constipation and dizziness
Shown to cause dry mouth in 25% against 15% on placebo, constipation in 13% against 7% and dizziness in 7% against 3%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 6-week US trials: dry mouth 25% vs 15% on placebo, constipation 13% vs 7%, asthenia 8% vs 5%, dizziness 7% vs 3% and peripheral edema 2% vs 1% [7].
- Population
- 453 adults on mirtazapine and 361 on placebo [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Six-week trials at 5 to 60 mg a day.
Headache
Shown to raise headache in placebo-controlled trials, 34% on modafinil against 23% on placebo, and more at higher doses.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In pooled placebo-controlled trials, headache occurred in 34% on modafinil against 23% on placebo, and was dose related across 200, 300 and 400 mg. Headache was the most frequent reason for stopping (2%) [3]. On armodafinil, headache occurred in 17% against 9% [6].
- Population
- 934 adults on modafinil and 567 on placebo in narcolepsy, sleep apnea and shift work trials [3]; 645 on armodafinil and 445 on placebo [6].
- Sources
- [3], [6]
- Caveats
- Trials ran 4 to 12 weeks in people with sleep disorders.
Headache, stomach upset and other common side effects
Shown in label trials to cause side effects at rates close to placebo, with headache in 18.4% on montelukast against 18.1% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In adult and adolescent asthma trials, rates on montelukast 10 mg and placebo were headache 18.4% and 18.1%, influenza 4.2% and 3.9%, abdominal pain 2.9% and 2.5%, dyspepsia 2.1% and 1.1%, dizziness 1.9% and 1.4%, and raised ALT 2.1% and 2.0% [1].
- Population
- 1,955 people on montelukast and 1,180 on placebo aged 15 and older [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The label lists events regardless of cause, and most differ little from placebo [1].
Headache, diarrhea and other common side effects
Shown in label trials to raise headache, diarrhea and dizziness against placebo, with headache in 12.2% on pantoprazole against 8.5% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In GERD trials, pantoprazole and placebo rates were headache 12.2% and 8.5%, diarrhea 8.8% and 4.9%, vomiting 4.3% and 2.4%, dizziness 3.0% and 1.2%, and joint pain 2.8% and 1.2%. Nausea (7.0% and 9.8%) and abdominal pain (6.2% and 6.1%) were not higher on the drug [3]. In esomeprazole healing trials, headache occurred in 5.5% on 20 mg, 5% on 40 mg and 3.8% on omeprazole 20 mg [7].
- Population
- 1,473 adults on pantoprazole and 82 on placebo in nine US trials [3]; 6,682 adults in four esomeprazole trials [7].
- Sources
- [3], [7]
- Caveats
- The placebo group in the pantoprazole trials was small (82 people) [3]. The esomeprazole trials had no placebo group [7].
Shift work disorder
About a quarter of shift workers met criteria for shift work disorder, insomnia or sleepiness tied to the work schedule, in one meta-analysis of 29 studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The pooled prevalence of shift work disorder was 26.5% (95% CI 21.0 to 32.8) [11].
- Population
- Workers in 29 occupational studies [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was very high (I² 98.5%), partly explained by diagnostic criteria and sample size. Most studies had no day-worker comparison group [11].
Memory, concentration and word-finding problems (label warning)
Shown to raise thinking problems: 22% at 100 mg against 10% on placebo in migraine trials, and up to 56% at high doses with fast titration.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 6-month migraine trials with slow titration, one or more cognitive adverse reactions occurred in 19% at 50 mg, 22% at 100 mg and 28% at 200 mg, against 10% on placebo. In add-on epilepsy trials with fast titration, they occurred in about 42% at 200 to 400 mg and 56% at 800 to 1,000 mg, against 14% on placebo [3]. In the migraine trials, difficulty with memory occurred in 7% at 100 mg against 2%, difficulty with concentration in 6% against 2%, language problems in 6% against 2% and mood problems in 6% against 2% [3]. A Cochrane review of add-on epilepsy trials found risk ratios of 7.81 for concentration difficulties and 5.70 for abnormal thinking [6].
- Population
- 1,135 adults on topiramate and 445 on placebo in migraine trials, and adults in epilepsy trials [3]; 1,650 participants in 12 trials [6].
- Sources
- [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The label states that faster titration and higher starting doses raised these effects, and that they often began during titration and sometimes persisted [3].
Tingling, taste change, appetite loss and stomach effects
Shown to cause tingling in about half of people at 100 mg, 51% against 6% on placebo, along with appetite loss, taste change, nausea and diarrhea.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In migraine trials at 100 mg, paresthesia occurred in 51% against 6% on placebo, anorexia in 15% against 6%, nausea in 13% against 8%, diarrhea in 11% against 4%, weight loss in 9% against 1%, and taste change in 8% against 1% (15% at 50 mg). 25% stopped topiramate for an adverse reaction, against 10% on placebo, most often for paresthesia (7%) [3]. In weight loss trials, paresthesia, taste impairment and psychomotor effects were the most common adverse events [7].
- Population
- 386 adults on 100 mg, 235 on 50 mg and 445 on placebo [3]; 6,620 people in weight trials [7].
- Sources
- [3], [7]
- Caveats
- Most of these effects were more frequent during titration than during maintenance [3].
Sleepiness and fatigue
Shown to raise sleepiness and fatigue, about twice as often as placebo in add-on epilepsy trials, with fatigue in 15% against 11% in migraine trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In migraine trials at 100 mg, fatigue occurred in 15% against 11% on placebo and sleepiness in 7% against 5%, both rising with dose [3]. In add-on epilepsy trials, the risk ratios against placebo were 2.44 for sleepiness, 2.08 for fatigue, 1.52 for dizziness and 2.29 for unsteadiness [6].
- Population
- Adults in migraine trials [3]; 1,650 participants in 12 epilepsy trials [6].
- Sources
- [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The label states sleepiness and fatigue were the most frequent reactions in add-on epilepsy trials [3].
Drowsiness and next-day impairment
Shown to cause drowsiness, in 41% of outpatients against 20% on placebo in depression trials, with small next-morning memory and balance deficits at 50 mg.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In controlled depression trials, drowsiness occurred in 41% of outpatients on trazodone against 20% on placebo, and in 24% of inpatients against 6% [12]. In insomnia trials, daytime drowsiness was more frequent than in control groups (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.14 to 5.64) [7]. In people with insomnia given 50 mg at bedtime, tests the next morning showed small but significant impairments of short-term memory, verbal learning, balance and arm muscle endurance [13]. The label states trazodone may impair the mental or physical ability needed for hazardous tasks such as driving [12].
- Population
- 157 outpatients and 142 inpatients on trazodone, 158 and 95 on placebo [12]; 466 participants in 11 insomnia RCTs [7]; 16 adults with primary insomnia, mean age 44, in a crossover trial [13].
- Sources
- [12], [7], [13]
- Caveats
- The label rates come from depression doses. The next-morning testing was in 16 people [13].
Dizziness, low blood pressure and fainting
Shown to cause dizziness in 20% to 28% against 5% to 15% on placebo, with low blood pressure in 4% to 7% and fainting in 3% to 5%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In controlled depression trials, dizziness or light-headedness occurred in 28% of outpatients on trazodone against 15% on placebo and 20% of inpatients against 5%. Hypotension occurred in 4% against 0 and 7% against 1%, and syncope in 5% against 1% and 3% against 2% [12]. The label states that a blood pressure medicine taken at the same time may need a lower dose [12]. In older outpatients with hypertension, trazodone users had a larger drop in blood pressure on standing (systolic 23.8 vs 14.3 mm Hg) and more syncope and falls (58.3% vs 21.2%) [16].
- Population
- 157 outpatients and 142 inpatients on trazodone, 158 and 95 on placebo [12]; 123 outpatients with hypertension, mean age 81, of whom 12 took trazodone [16].
- Sources
- [12], [16]
- Caveats
- The observational study had 12 trazodone users, and its association weakened after adjusting for a dementia diagnosis [16].
Next-morning impairment and driving
Shown to impair next-morning driving performance after 10 mg at bedtime in crossover trials, and linked to about twice the crash rate in new users.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of on-road driving trials in healthy subjects, zolpidem 10 mg at bedtime produced significantly more lane weaving the next morning than placebo after a single dose. Repeated dosing caused fewer residual effects than a single dose [20]. In 3-week trials of extended-release zolpidem, next-day sleepiness was reported by 15% of adults on 12.5 mg against 2% on placebo, and by 6% of older adults on 6.25 mg against 5% [15]. The zolpidem label reports a small but statistically significant drop on a symbol substitution test in four of seven studies in people without insomnia [13]. Eszopiclone 3 mg impaired psychomotor function and memory at 7.5 hours after dosing and still at 11.5 hours, while people's own sense of sedation was not consistently different from placebo [7]. In a cohort linked to crash records, new users of zolpidem had a higher crash rate than non-users (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.64 to 2.95) [21].
- Population
- 22 crossover trials in healthy subjects [20]; 212 adults and 205 older adults with primary insomnia in 3-week trials [15]; 91 healthy adults aged 25 to 40 [7]; 409,171 licensed drivers aged 21 or older in one US health plan [21].
- Sources
- [20], [15], [13], [7], [21]
- Caveats
- The band above is the next-day sleepiness rate on extended-release 12.5 mg. Confidence in the driving evidence was rated low to very low [20]. The crash study is observational, and insomnia itself may affect driving [21]. Label studies in non-elderly people with insomnia did not detect next-day effects on the tests used [13].
Higher morning blood levels in women
FDA states women clear zolpidem more slowly than men, with about 15% of women and 3% of men above an impairing blood level 8 hours after 10 mg.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- FDA reported that driving simulation and laboratory studies indicate zolpidem blood levels above about 50 ng/mL appear capable of impairing driving. In pharmacokinetic trials of 10 mg in about 250 men and 250 women, about 15% of women and 3% of men were above that level roughly 8 hours after dosing. After extended-release 12.5 mg, about 33% of women and 25% of men were above it, and after 6.25 mg about 15% of women and 5% of men. On this basis FDA required the labeled dose for women to be halved [16]. The label reports peak level and total exposure about 45% higher in women than men at the same dose, and similar clearance in older men and women [13].
- Population
- About 500 adults in pharmacokinetic trials of immediate-release zolpidem, plus trials of the extended-release form [16].
- Sources
- [16], [13]
- Caveats
- These are blood levels, not counts of crashes or injuries. The threshold of 50 ng/mL is FDA's estimate from simulation and laboratory studies.
Rebound insomnia after stopping
The alprazolam label reports insomnia in 29.5% of people after discontinuation in its panic disorder studies, more than after placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Among 641 people who had received alprazolam for panic disorder, symptoms emerging on discontinuation included insomnia (29.5%), lightheadedness (19.3%), anxiety (19.2%), fatigue (18.4%), headache (17.0%), nausea or vomiting (16.5%) and sweating (14.4%). The label states each occurred more often than after placebo and does not give the placebo rates [18].
- Population
- 641 patients in controlled and uncontrolled alprazolam studies [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- The data mix controlled and uncontrolled studies, and placebo rates are not shown.
Dry mouth, dizziness and constipation
The clonidine tablet label reports dry mouth in about 40 of 100 people, dizziness in 16 and constipation in 10, mostly dose-related and easing over time.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The most frequent effects on clonidine tablets were dry mouth (about 40 in 100), drowsiness (about 33), dizziness (about 16), and constipation and sedation (about 10 each), mostly dose-related [13]. In children with ADHD, dry mouth occurred in 5% on 0.4 mg against 1% and constipation in 6% against 0% [6].
- Population
- Adults on clonidine tablets [13]; children and adolescents on extended-release clonidine [6].
- Sources
- [13], [6]
- Caveats
- The tablet label gives no placebo rates.
Dry mouth and other common side effects
One trial found side effects in 52% on hydroxyzine against 35% on placebo, with dry mouth in 14% against 5%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Over 4 weeks at 50 mg a day, any side effect was reported by 52% on hydroxyzine and 35% on placebo: dry mouth 14% vs 5%, weight gain 12% vs 10%, loss of concentration 9% vs 8% and insomnia 9% vs 6% [4]. The label lists dry mouth as an anticholinergic effect and headache and hallucination among postmarketing reports [5].
- Population
- 133 patients with generalized anxiety disorder [4].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- One trial of 4 weeks. The label gives no rates.
Emergence reactions at anesthetic doses
The Ketalar label reports confusion or agitation on waking from ketamine anesthesia in about 12% of patients, from dream-like states to hallucinations.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Emergence delirium occurred in about 12% during recovery, usually lasting a few hours, ranging from pleasant dream-like states to vivid imagery, hallucinations and confusion [12]. At the lower doses used around surgery, central nervous system adverse events occurred in 5% on ketamine against 4% on control (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.4) [10].
- Population
- Patients given anesthetic doses [12]; 6,538 participants in 105 surgical trials [10].
- Sources
- [12], [10]
- Caveats
- Anesthetic doses are far higher than depression or pain doses.
Effects that interfered with daily life
One US survey found 10.6% of people who had ever meditated reported some impairment in daily functioning from it, lasting a month or more for 1.2%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Among 434 adults with any meditation experience, 32.3% answered yes to a general question about meditation-related adverse effects and 50.0% endorsed at least one specific effect. Anxiety, traumatic re-experiencing and emotional sensitivity were most common. Effects lasted a month or more for 10.4%. Some impairment of functioning was reported by 10.6%, lasting a month or more for 1.2%. Childhood adversity was linked to higher risk, and people reporting effects were as glad to have meditated as others [25].
- Population
- 434 US adults with lifetime meditation exposure, from a population-based sample of 953 [25].
- Sources
- [25]
- Caveats
- A single cross-sectional survey of recalled experience, with no comparison group of people who did not meditate [25].
Interaction with nitroglycerin
Small trials found more headache and low blood pressure when NAC was given with nitroglycerin in hospital patients with unstable angina.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 200 patients with unstable angina, oral NAC with transdermal nitroglycerin was followed by side effects in 35%, mainly intolerable headache, almost twice as often as nitroglycerin alone [11]. In 46 patients, intravenous NAC with intravenous nitroglycerin caused symptomatic hypotension in 7 versus 0 on nitroglycerin alone [12].
- Population
- Hospital patients with unstable angina [11][12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Hospital doses, in [12] 5 g intravenously every 6 hours. The same combination also lowered cardiac event rates in both trials.
Altered skin sensation (dysesthesia) at 7.2 mg
One trial found altered skin sensation in 23% on 7.2 mg, 6% on 2.4 mg and under 1% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Dysesthesia was reported in 22.9% on semaglutide 7.2 mg, 6.0% on 2.4 mg and 0.5% on placebo [3].
- Population
- 1,406 adults with obesity without diabetes who received at least one dose in STEP UP (1,004, 201 and 201) [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- One trial, funded by Novo Nordisk. The abstract does not report how long the sensations lasted or how severe they were [3].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 1,407 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Headache
One trial found more headaches on spironolactone than placebo in women treated for acne, 20% against 12%, with no serious adverse reactions.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In women treated for acne at 50 to 100 mg a day, headache was reported by 20% on spironolactone and 12% on placebo (P = 0.02). Adverse reactions overall were slightly more frequent on spironolactone, and none were serious [9].
- Population
- 410 women with facial acne treated for 24 weeks [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- One trial in young women without heart or kidney disease.
High ammonia, and low body temperature with valproate
The label reports raised blood ammonia, in 26% of teenagers on 100 mg against 9% on placebo, and more often with valproate, sometimes with confusion or low body temperature.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In adolescents in migraine trials, hyperammonemia occurred in 26% on 100 mg, 14% on 50 mg and 9% on placebo. Hyperammonemia with or without encephalopathy was reported more often with valproic acid, including in people who tolerated either drug alone. Hypothermia below 35 °C has been reported with the combination, with or without high ammonia [3].
- Population
- Adolescents aged 12 to 17 in migraine trials, and postmarketing reports [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- The trial rate is from adolescents. Some cases had no symptoms [3].
Severe low blood sugar in type 2 diabetes
Shown to raise severe low blood sugar in type 2 diabetes, to 5.6% on insulin glargine against 1.8% on standard care over 6.2 years in one trial.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Severe hypoglycemia was more frequent with insulin than with other glucose-lowering drugs across 20 trials (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.91) [7]. In a network meta-analysis, basal insulin alone carried the highest odds of hypoglycemia against metformin (OR 17.9, 95% CI 1.97 to 162, risk difference 10%) [6]. Over a median 6.2 years, 5.6% on glargine and 1.8% on standard care had severe symptomatic hypoglycemia [5], at 1.00 against 0.31 per 100 person-years [8]. In label trials of 28 weeks to 5 years, it occurred in 0.4% to 7.8% on glargine and 1.1% to 11.9% on NPH [5]. Major episodes occurred in 1.8% a year on insulin against 0.7% on diet [3]. Added to metformin, severe hypoglycemia occurred in 1.3% on glargine, 2.2% on glimepiride, 1.0% on liraglutide and 0.7% on sitagliptin over a mean 5.0 years [4].
- Population
- 18,599 patients in 20 trials [7]; 301 trials [6]; 12,504 people in the outcome trial [5][8]; 3,867 newly diagnosed patients [3]; 5,047 participants on metformin [4].
- Sources
- [7], [6], [5], [8], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The confidence interval in the network meta-analysis was very wide [6]. Rates were lower in people recently diagnosed and on metformin [4].
Depression and suicide
Mixed results: two meta-analyses found no rise in depression or suicide, while a Swedish cohort linked treatment to more suicide attempts during and 6 months after. The label warns.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 25 studies, the 1-year absolute risk of depression was 3.83% and of each suicide outcome under 0.5%. Users were less likely than nonusers to attempt suicide at 2 to 4 years (RR 0.86 at 3 years), and psychiatric disorders overall did not rise (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.19) [10]. In 31 studies, depression scores fell from baseline and depression prevalence fell (RR 0.588) [11]. In Sweden, suicide attempts during and up to 6 months after treatment were 1.78 times the expected number (95% CI 1.04 to 2.85), but were already raised the year before, about one extra first attempt per 2,300 treatment courses [12]. In 30,866 users, new psychiatric diagnoses were less common than on oral antibiotics (OR 0.80) and similar to topical treatment [13]. The label warns of depression, psychosis and, rarely, suicidal thoughts, attempts and suicide [3].
- Population
- 1,625,891 participants in 25 studies [10]; 31 controlled or prospective studies [11]; 5,756 Swedish patients aged 15 to 49 [12]; 30,866 isotretinoin users with acne aged 12 to 27 and matched comparison groups, in electronic records [13].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [12], [13], [3]
- Caveats
- Observational studies. The meta-analysis of depression scores included no randomized trials [11]. Severe acne itself carries mental health burden, which the cohorts try to separate from the drug [12][13]. The band above is the 1-year depression risk [10].
Bleeding in the brain
Shown to cause bleeding inside the skull in 1.40% of people with atrial fibrillation over the trials, about twice the 0.63% on DOACs.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In four atrial fibrillation trials, intracranial bleeding occurred in 1.40% on warfarin against 0.63% on a standard-dose DOAC (HR 0.45 for the DOAC, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.56) [5]. The trial-level meta-analysis gave a similar result (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.59) [4]. Among people treated for venous clots, intracranial bleeding occurred at 1.15 per 100 patient-years [17]. In older placebo-controlled atrial fibrillation trials, intracranial hemorrhage was not significantly increased, with wide confidence intervals [2].
- Population
- 29,272 people on warfarin in four trials [5][4]; 4,374 patient-years of treatment for venous clots [17].
- Sources
- [5], [4], [17], [2]
- Caveats
- The comparator in the large trials is a DOAC, not placebo.
Fainting, most often after the first doses
The label warns terazosin can cause fainting after the first dose or first few days, reported in about 1% of hypertension trial patients.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In trials of nearly 2,000 hypertensive patients, syncope was reported in about 1% on terazosin. In BPH trials it was 0.6% on terazosin against 0% on placebo. The risk was greatest in the first 7 days but continued at all times [19]. Syncope was 0.2% on tamsulosin 0.4 mg, 0.4% on 0.8 mg and 0.6% on placebo [4], and 0.2% on alfuzosin against 0% on placebo [6].
- Population
- Nearly 2,000 hypertensive patients and 996 men with BPH [19]; 1,487 men [4]; 1,151 men [6].
- Sources
- [19], [4], [6]
- Caveats
- Terazosin and doxazosin labels start at 1 mg because of this effect [19][7]. Tamsulosin did not differ from placebo.
FDA boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people
FDA states antidepressants raised suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children, teenagers and young adults in short-term trials, 14 more cases per 1,000 under age 18.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In FDA's pooled analyses of placebo-controlled antidepressant trials, the drug-placebo difference in suicidal thinking or behavior was 14 more cases per 1,000 under 18, 5 more at 18 to 24, 1 fewer at 25 to 64 and 6 fewer at 65 and older. No suicides occurred in the pediatric trials [13].
- Population
- Over 4,400 children and adolescents in 24 trials and over 77,000 adults in 295 trials of several antidepressants [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- The pooled trials cover many antidepressants, not amitriptyline alone. The band is the excess under age 18 [13].
Drowsiness and fatigue
Shown in label trials to raise drowsiness on levocetirizine, 6% against 2% on placebo, and it was the most common reason for stopping.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In placebo-controlled trials of 1 to 6 weeks, rates on levocetirizine 5 mg, 2.5 mg and placebo were somnolence 6%, 5% and 2%, fatigue 4%, 1% and 2%, and dry mouth 2%, 3% and 1%. Somnolence rose with dose and led to stopping in 0.5%. In 4 to 6 month trials, 2.3% stopped for somnolence, fatigue or weakness against under 1% on placebo [1].
- Population
- 1,070 people on levocetirizine 5 mg, 421 on 2.5 mg and 912 on placebo, aged 12 and older [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Rates differ between antihistamines, and no rates for cetirizine, loratadine or fexofenadine were sourced here.
FDA boxed warning: death in older people with dementia-related psychosis
FDA states older people with dementia-related psychosis on antipsychotics had about 1.6 to 1.7 times the death rate of placebo, 4.5% against 2.6% over 10 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Both labels carry this boxed warning and state the drug is not approved for dementia-related psychosis. In 17 placebo-controlled trials, largely of atypical antipsychotics and typically 10 weeks long, death occurred in about 4.5% on a drug and about 2.6% on placebo [3][10]. A meta-analysis of 15 trials found death in 3.5% (118) on atypical antipsychotics and 2.3% (40) on placebo (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.23), with no evidence of different risks between individual drugs [15]. A later review put the figure at one extra death per 87 older people treated [12].
- Population
- Older people with dementia in 17 placebo-controlled trials pooled by FDA [3]; 15 trials of aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone [15].
- Sources
- [3], [10], [15], [12]
- Caveats
- A class finding. The label states that most deaths appeared to be cardiovascular or infectious in nature, with varied causes.
FDA boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people
FDA states antidepressants raised suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children, adolescents and young adults in short trials, 14 more cases per 1,000 under age 18.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Both labels carry the antidepressant class boxed warning because the drugs are used in depression. In FDA's pooled analyses of placebo-controlled antidepressant trials, the difference from placebo in cases of suicidal thoughts or behaviors per 1,000 patients treated was 14 more under age 18, 5 more at ages 18 to 24, 1 fewer at ages 25 to 64 and 6 fewer at 65 and older. No suicides occurred in the pediatric trials [3][10].
- Population
- Placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants pooled by FDA [3].
- Sources
- [3], [10]
- Caveats
- The pooled analyses are of antidepressants as a group, not of quetiapine or aripiprazole. The label reports differences from placebo, not absolute rates, so the band above is the excess under age 18.
Low mood, disinhibition and paradoxical reactions
Shown to raise reports of depression, in 7% on clonazepam against 1% on placebo in panic trials. Labels also report rare agitation, rage and aggression.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In clonazepam panic trials, depression was reported by 7% against 1% on placebo, and led 4% against 1% to stop [3]. The alprazolam label states benzodiazepines may worsen depression and reports episodes of hypomania and mania in people with depression. It reports paradoxical reactions such as agitation, rage, irritability and aggressive behavior rarely [18]. The diazepam label states such reactions are more likely in children and older adults [8].
- Population
- 574 adults on clonazepam and 294 on placebo in trials of 6 to 9 weeks [3].
- Sources
- [3], [18], [8]
- Caveats
- The labels give no rate for paradoxical reactions.
FDA boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people
FDA states antidepressants raised suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children, adolescents and young adults in short-term trials, 14 more cases per 1,000 under age 18.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The bupropion label carries the antidepressant boxed warning. In FDA's pooled analyses of placebo-controlled antidepressant trials, the difference between drug and placebo in cases of suicidal thoughts or behaviors per 1,000 patients treated was 14 more under age 18, 5 more at ages 18 to 24, 1 fewer at ages 25 to 64 and 6 fewer at 65 and older. No suicides occurred in the pediatric trials [8]. In the pediatric analysis, the risk ratio for all antidepressants across all indications was 1.95 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.98), a risk difference of 0.02 [19]. In adults with psychiatric indications, the odds ratio for suicidal behavior or ideation was 1.62 (95% CI 0.97 to 2.71) under age 25, 0.79 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) at 25 to 64 and 0.37 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.76) at 65 and older [20].
- Population
- Placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants in adults and pediatric patients pooled by FDA [8][19][20].
- Sources
- [8], [19], [20]
- Caveats
- The pooled analyses cover antidepressants as a group, not bupropion alone. The label reports differences from placebo, not absolute rates, so the band above is the excess under age 18. The trials were short.
Nausea and tiredness with gepants
Shown to raise nausea on gepants, 9% on atogepant 60 mg against 3%, and 2% to 4% on rimegepant or ubrogepant against under 1% to 2%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- On atogepant, nausea occurred in 5% to 9% against 3%, fatigue or sleepiness in 4% to 5% against 4%, and decreased appetite in up to 3% [16]. Pooled atogepant trials found nausea (RR 2.19) and fatigue at high doses (RR 3.07) more frequent [5]. On ubrogepant, nausea occurred in 2% to 4% against 2% and sleepiness in 2% to 3% against 1% [15]. In the rimegepant prevention trial, nausea occurred in 2.7% against 0.8% [6]. Adverse events overall after a rimegepant dose were 14.3% against 12.7% (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.30) [8].
- Population
- Label trials [16][15][6]; 2,813 in atogepant trials [5]; 6,734 in rimegepant trials [8].
- Sources
- [16], [5], [15], [6], [8]
- Caveats
- Short trials.
Nightmares, irritability and insomnia in children
Shown in children's ADHD trials to raise nightmares, 9% at 0.4 mg against 0% on placebo, along with irritability and insomnia.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In children on extended-release clonidine, nightmares occurred in 4% at 0.2 mg and 9% at 0.4 mg against 0% on placebo, irritability in 9% and 5% against 4%, and insomnia in 5% and 6% against 1% [6].
- Population
- 154 children and adolescents on clonidine and 76 on placebo [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Rates from one 8-week trial.
Misuse
Linked to misuse in about 1% of the general population and 15% to 22% of people who abuse opioids, in a systematic review of gabapentin.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- A systematic review put gabapentin misuse at 1% in the general population, 40% to 65% among people with prescriptions and 15% to 22% among people who abuse opioids. People with a history of drug abuse were most often involved [22]. A later review of 55 studies found opioid use disorder was the greatest risk factor and reported growing evidence of harm, including more hospital use and higher risk of opioid-related overdose death [23]. In pregabalin trials of over 5,500 people, euphoria was reported as an adverse reaction by 4% against 1% on placebo. In 15 recreational users of sedative drugs, a single 450 mg dose was rated for liking and high at a level similar to diazepam 30 mg [7]. The gabapentin label states that misuse and abuse have been reported, mostly in people with a history of polysubstance abuse, and that its abuse potential has not been evaluated in human studies [19].
- Population
- Epidemiological studies and case reports of gabapentin [22]; 55 studies, 46 of them observational [23]; over 5,500 people in pregabalin trials [7].
- Sources
- [22], [23], [7], [19]
- Caveats
- The band above is the rate of euphoria in pregabalin trials. Misuse figures come from surveys and special populations with varied definitions.
Mood and behavior changes in children on gabapentin
Shown to cause emotional lability in 6% against 1.3% on placebo and hostility in 5.2% against 1.3% in children aged 3 to 12 with epilepsy.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In controlled epilepsy trials in children aged 3 to 12, emotional lability was reported by 6% on gabapentin against 1.3% on placebo, hostility including aggressive behavior by 5.2% against 1.3%, hyperkinesia by 4.7% against 2.9% and thought disorder, including concentration problems, by 1.7% against 0. Most reactions were mild to moderate [19].
- Population
- Children aged 3 to 12 with epilepsy in controlled trials [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for gabapentin in children with epilepsy.
Mood changes and depression
Shown to raise low mood: depression in 2.4% on Myfembree against 0.8% on placebo, and 3% on Oriahnn against 1%. The labels warn of suicidal ideation.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- On Myfembree, depression was reported by 2.4% against 0.8% on placebo, irritability by 2.4% against 0%, and anxiety by 1.2% against 0.8%. Suicidal ideation was reported in endometriosis trials, all in women with a history of depression or anxiety [2]. On Oriahnn, depression, depressed mood or tearfulness affected 3% against 1%, and one woman taking lower-dose elagolix for another condition died by suicide [6]. On leuprolide, depression or emotional lability affected 11% against 4% on placebo [10].
- Population
- Women in the placebo-controlled fibroid trials [2][6][10].
- Sources
- [2], [6], [10]
- Caveats
- Single suicide cases cannot give a rate.
Headache, dizziness and constipation
The labels report headache, dizziness and constipation in 1% or more on famotidine. On cimetidine 1,600 mg a day, headache occurred in 3.5% against 2.3% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Headache, dizziness and constipation occurred in 1% or more of 1,442 famotidine-treated patients in 7 trials. The label gives no placebo rate [2]. On cimetidine, headache was reported in 3.5% on 1,600 mg a day, 2.1% on 800 mg a day and 2.3% on placebo. Diarrhea, dizziness and drowsiness were each reported in about 1 in 100 [14].
- Population
- About 2,500 patients in 7 famotidine trials [2]; 924, 2,225 and 1,897 patients on cimetidine 1,600 mg, 800 mg and placebo [14].
- Sources
- [2], [14]
- Caveats
- Only the cimetidine label gives a placebo rate, and only for headache.
Unpleasant experiences during or after meditation
Shown in a review of 83 studies to occur in 8.3% of people who meditated, most often anxiety, depression and unusual thinking or perception.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 83 studies with 6,703 participants, 55 reported at least one adverse event. Pooled prevalence was 8.3% (95% CI 5% to 12%): 3.7% in experimental studies and 33.2% in observational ones. The most common were anxiety, depression and cognitive anomalies, and events occurred in people with no history of mental health problems [24]. When an independent assessor asked 96 people after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, 58% reported effects with a negative tone, 37% reported effects that hurt their functioning, and 6% to 14% reported lasting adverse effects [23]. In the anxiety disorder trial, 15.4% in the mindfulness arm had at least one study-related adverse event, against 78.6% on escitalopram [4].
- Population
- 6,703 participants in 83 studies [24]. 96 adults in 8-week courses [23]. 276 adults with anxiety disorders [4].
- Sources
- [24], [23], [4]
- Caveats
- Rates depend heavily on how carefully events are asked about. Most trials do not ask: only 7 of 38 pain trials reported whether adverse events were monitored [8].
Side effects in trials
Daytime sleepiness was the most frequent side effect in trials, at about 1.7%, followed by headache and dizziness, with few serious events.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Across 37 RCTs, the most frequent adverse events were daytime sleepiness (1.66%), headache (0.74%), other sleep-related events (0.74%), dizziness (0.74%) and hypothermia (0.62%). Few serious events were reported. Agitation, fatigue, mood swings, nightmares, skin irritation and palpitations were listed as of possible clinical significance [13].
- Population
- RCTs of melatonin for primary or secondary sleep disorders [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Most trials ran 4 weeks or less, and only 8 of 37 met the top risk-of-bias rating. Long-term data are scarce [13].
FDA boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people
FDA states antidepressants raised suicidal thoughts and behaviors in pediatric and young adult patients in short-term trials, 14 more cases per 1,000 under age 18.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The label carries the antidepressant boxed warning and states that mirtazapine is not approved for pediatric patients. In FDA's pooled analyses of placebo-controlled antidepressant trials in about 77,000 adults and 4,500 pediatric patients, the difference from placebo in patients with suicidal thoughts or behaviors per 1,000 treated was 14 more under age 18, 5 more at ages 18 to 24, 1 fewer at ages 25 to 64 and 6 fewer at 65 and older [7].
- Population
- Placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants pooled by FDA [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The pooled analyses cover antidepressants as a group, not mirtazapine alone. The label reports differences from placebo, not absolute rates, so the band above is the excess under age 18.
Insomnia, nervousness and anxiety
Shown to raise insomnia and anxiety, each 5% on modafinil against 1% on placebo, and nervousness 7% against 3%. Anxiety rose with dose.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In pooled trials, insomnia occurred in 5% vs 1% on placebo, anxiety in 5% vs 1% and nervousness in 7% vs 3%. Anxiety was dose related [3]. On armodafinil, insomnia occurred in 5% vs 1% [6]. A meta-analysis of neurological conditions found insomnia and nausea more frequent on modafinil than placebo [13].
- Population
- 934 on modafinil and 567 on placebo [3]; 645 on armodafinil and 445 on placebo [6]; 535 patients in 10 trials [13].
- Sources
- [3], [6], [13]
- Caveats
- Doses in the label trials were taken in the morning or before a shift.
Mood and behavior changes in trials and cohort studies
Mixed results: pooled placebo-controlled trials found behavior events in 2.73% on montelukast against 2.27% on placebo, while some observational studies linked it to anxiety, ADHD and other events.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 46 placebo-controlled trials, behavior-related adverse events occurred in 2.73% on montelukast and 2.27% on placebo (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.36), and serious ones in 0.03% of each [9]. A meta-analysis of 18 randomized trials found no significant rise in neuropsychiatric events against placebo [10]. A 2025 meta-analysis found 11% higher risk of anxiety (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.16) and no consistent rise in depression or suicidal behavior [11]. In children with asthma, one case-control study found new neuropsychiatric events at nearly twice the odds with montelukast (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.18) [12], another found no association (adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.14) [13], and a birth cohort linked it to ADHD (HR 1.40) and conduct disorders (HR 1.43) against inhaled steroids [14].
- Population
- 11,673 people on montelukast and 8,827 on placebo [9]; 18 randomized trials [10]; 4 studies for the mental health analysis [11]; 898 cases and 3,497 controls [12]; 1,920 cases [13]; 97,176 children with asthma in two cohorts [14].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- The trial analysis counted events reported as adverse experiences, which can miss milder changes [9]. Observational studies can be confounded by asthma severity and by who is prescribed montelukast.
Addiction and misuse
Linked to addiction in about 1% to 6% of people within 12 months of starting long-term opioid treatment, in a study cited on the label.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The oxycodone label describes a prospective cohort study of people starting long-term Schedule II opioid treatment between 2017 and 2021. Over 12 months, about 1% to 6% across two cohorts newly met criteria for addiction, measured as moderate to severe opioid use disorder, and about 9% and 22% newly met criteria for prescription opioid abuse and misuse [20]. A systematic review of 38 studies in chronic pain found rates of problematic use ranging from under 1% to 81%. Misuse averaged 21% to 29% and addiction 8% to 12% [21].
- Population
- Two cohorts of 978 and 1,244 people starting long-term opioid treatment [20]; 38 studies of people with chronic pain on opioids [21].
- Sources
- [20], [21]
- Caveats
- Observational. The label notes the estimates may not apply to people with shorter or longer exposure [20]. Definitions and methods varied widely across the reviewed studies [21]. The band here is taken from the label's 1% to 6%.
Overdose
Linked to overdose that rises with daily dose, with a 5-year rate of about 1.5% to 4% among new long-term users in a label-cited study.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The oxycodone label describes a cohort of 220,249 people with new long-term use of Schedule II opioids from 2006 to 2016. The 5-year cumulative incidence of opioid-involved overdose or overdose death ranged from about 1.5% to 4% across study sites, and about 17% of first overdoses were fatal. Higher baseline dose was the strongest predictor [20]. In people prescribed opioids for chronic non-cancer pain, the annual overdose rate was 0.2% at 1 to 20 mg of morphine equivalents a day, 0.7% at 50 to 99 mg (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 9.5) and 1.8% at 100 mg or more (HR 8.9, 95% CI 4.0 to 19.7) [17]. Among veterans, fatal overdose occurred in an estimated 0.04% of those treated, and a maximum dose of 100 mg a day or more carried hazard ratios of 7.18 in chronic pain and 6.64 in acute pain against under 20 mg [18].
- Population
- 220,249 new long-term users [20]; 9,940 people given 3 or more opioid prescriptions within 90 days [17]; 750 overdose deaths and a sample of 154,684 veterans treated with opioids [18].
- Sources
- [20], [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational. About 80% of the label-cited cohort was lost to follow-up, and its exclusion criteria may have selected people at lower risk [20]. People on higher doses may differ in ways the studies could not measure [17].
Withdrawal on stopping
Shown to cause withdrawal symptoms, in 2.4% against 0.9% on placebo in osteoarthritis trials. The label warns against stopping abruptly in physically dependent people.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 3 osteoarthritis trials, withdrawal symptoms occurred in 2.4% on opioids and 0.9% on control (OR 2.76, 95% CI 2.02 to 3.77) [9]. The oxycodone label states that tolerance and physical dependence can develop during opioid therapy, and that rapid reduction or abrupt discontinuation in physically dependent people has resulted in serious withdrawal symptoms, uncontrolled pain and suicide [20].
- Population
- People with knee or hip osteoarthritis in 3 trials [9]; people physically dependent on opioids, as described in the label [20].
- Sources
- [9], [20]
- Caveats
- The trials lasted weeks to months, shorter than much real-world use.
FDA boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people
FDA states antidepressants raised suicidal thoughts and behaviors in pediatric and young adult patients in short-term trials, 14 more cases per 1,000 under age 18.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Every SNRI label carries this boxed warning. In FDA's pooled analyses of placebo-controlled antidepressant trials, the difference between drug and placebo in cases of suicidal thoughts or behaviors per 1,000 patients treated was 14 more under age 18, 5 more at ages 18 to 24, 1 fewer at ages 25 to 64 and 6 fewer at 65 and older [18]. In the pediatric analysis, the risk ratio for all drugs across all indications was 1.95 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.98), a risk difference of 0.02 [25]. In adults with psychiatric indications, the odds ratio for suicidal behavior or ideation was 1.62 (95% CI 0.97 to 2.71) under age 25, 0.79 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) at 25 to 64 and 0.37 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.76) at 65 and older [26]. In a Cochrane analysis of pediatric depression trials, venlafaxine had higher odds of suicide-related outcomes than placebo (OR 13.84, 95% CI 1.79 to 106.90) [24].
- Population
- Placebo-controlled trials of SSRIs and other antidepressants in adults and pediatric patients pooled by FDA [18][25][26]; 26 pediatric depression studies [24].
- Sources
- [18], [25], [26], [24]
- Caveats
- The label reports differences from placebo, not absolute rates, so the band above is the excess under age 18. The trials were short. The outcome was thoughts and behaviors, and no suicides occurred in the pediatric trials [18].
FDA boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people
FDA states antidepressants raised suicidal thoughts and behaviors in pediatric and young adult patients in short-term trials, 14 more cases per 1,000 under age 18.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Every SSRI label carries this boxed warning. In FDA's pooled analyses of placebo-controlled trials, the difference between drug and placebo in cases of suicidal thoughts or behaviors per 1,000 patients treated was 14 more under age 18, 5 more at ages 18 to 24, 1 fewer at ages 25 to 64 and 6 fewer at 65 and older. No suicides occurred in the pediatric trials [24]. In the pediatric analysis, the risk ratio was 1.66 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.68) for SSRIs in depression trials and 1.95 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.98) for all drugs across all indications, a risk difference of 0.02 [29]. In adults with psychiatric indications, the odds ratio for suicidal behavior or ideation was 1.62 (95% CI 0.97 to 2.71) under age 25, 0.79 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) at 25 to 64 and 0.37 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.76) at 65 and older [30].
- Population
- About 77,000 adults and over 4,400 pediatric patients in placebo-controlled trials of SSRIs and other antidepressants [24][29][30].
- Sources
- [24], [29], [30]
- Caveats
- The label reports differences from placebo, not absolute rates, so the band above is the excess under age 18. The trials were short, and the label states it is unknown whether the risk extends beyond four months. The outcome was thoughts and behaviors. The number of suicides in adult trials was too small for any conclusion [24].
Dizziness, nausea and gut upset
Shown to cause dizziness in 5.0% on glimepiride against 2.4% on placebo and nausea in 5.0% against 3.4%, with diarrhea in 5.4% on glipizide against none.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 11 pooled placebo-controlled trials of glimepiride, dizziness was reported by 5.0% against 2.4% on placebo, nausea by 5.0% against 3.4% and headache by 8.2% against 7.8% [3]. In placebo-controlled trials of extended-release glipizide, dizziness was reported by 6.8% against 5.8%, diarrhea by 5.4% against 0%, tremor by 3.6% against 0% and flatulence by 3.2% against 1.4% [13]. In glyburide trials, gut disturbances such as nausea, fullness and heartburn occurred in 1.8% [14].
- Population
- 745 people on glimepiride and 294 on placebo [3]; 278 on extended-release glipizide and 69 on placebo [13].
- Sources
- [3], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- The glipizide placebo group was small, and the glyburide label gives no placebo rate.
FDA boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people
FDA states antidepressants raised suicidal thoughts and behaviors in pediatric and young adult patients in short-term trials, 14 more cases per 1,000 under age 18.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The trazodone label carries the antidepressant boxed warning. In FDA's pooled analyses of placebo-controlled antidepressant trials, the difference between drug and placebo in cases of suicidal thoughts or behaviors per 1,000 patients treated was 14 more under age 18, 5 more at ages 18 to 24, 1 fewer at ages 25 to 64 and 6 fewer at 65 and older [12]. In the pediatric analysis, the risk ratio for all antidepressants across all indications was 1.95 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.98), a risk difference of 0.02 [14]. In adults with psychiatric indications, the odds ratio for suicidal behavior or ideation was 1.62 (95% CI 0.97 to 2.71) under age 25, 0.79 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) at 25 to 64 and 0.37 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.76) at 65 and older [15].
- Population
- Placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants in adults and pediatric patients pooled by FDA [12][14][15].
- Sources
- [12], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- The pooled analyses cover antidepressants as a group, not trazodone alone. The label reports differences from placebo, not absolute rates, so the band above is the excess under age 18. The trials were short, and the label states it is unknown whether the risk extends beyond four months.
Tingling, warmth and chest, neck or jaw tightness
Shown to raise tingling, warm or cold sensations and pressure or tightness, with chest symptoms in 2% on sumatriptan 50 or 100 mg against 1% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In the label's placebo-controlled trials, tingling was reported by 3% to 5% on sumatriptan tablets and 2% on placebo, pain and pressure sensations by 6% to 8% against 4%, chest pain, tightness or pressure by 1% to 2% against 1%, neck, throat or jaw tightness by up to 3% against under 1%, and tiredness by 2% to 3% against under 1%. The label states that these sensations are usually not from the heart [11]. Across 53 trials, sumatriptan 100 mg added 13 percentage points to the share with any adverse event over placebo, 6 points for nervous system events and 1.9 points for chest events [3]. In adolescents, minor adverse events were 13 percentage points more frequent than on placebo [10].
- Population
- 1,625 people on sumatriptan tablets and 309 on placebo [11]; 24,089 patients in 53 trials [3]; 7,026 adolescents [10].
- Sources
- [11], [3], [10]
- Caveats
- The band here is taken from the 2% with chest symptoms named in the Finding. Any adverse event was more frequent than that.
Drowsiness, dizziness and other common side effects
Shown to cause drowsiness in 8% against 5% on placebo and dizziness in 5% against 1% in zolpidem trials lasting 28 to 35 nights.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In US trials of zolpidem up to 10 mg lasting 28 to 35 nights: drowsiness 8% vs 5% on placebo, dizziness 5% vs 1%, drugged feeling 3% vs 0, lethargy 3% vs 1%, dry mouth 3% vs 1% and palpitation 2% vs 0. In trials of up to 10 nights: headache 7% vs 6%, drowsiness 2% vs 0, dizziness 1% vs 0 and diarrhea 1% vs 0. About 4% of 1,701 people in US premarketing trials stopped because of an adverse reaction [13]. In a 6-week eszopiclone trial, somnolence was reported by 10% on 2 mg and 8% on 3 mg against 3% on placebo, dizziness by 5% and 7% against 4%, and headache by 21% and 17% against 13% [7].
- Population
- 152 people on zolpidem and 161 on placebo in three trials of 28 to 35 nights, and 685 and 473 in 11 trials of up to 10 nights [13]; 308 adults in a 6-week eszopiclone trial [7].
- Sources
- [13], [7]
- Caveats
- The label notes a dose relationship for many of these reactions. Rates come from trials of people selected for insomnia without other major illness.
Memory loss, confusion and hallucinations
Shown to cause memory problems, confusion or hallucinations in about 1% to 3% of adults in trials, and hallucinations in 7% of children in one trial.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In zolpidem trials of 28 to 35 nights, amnesia was reported by 1% against 0 on placebo, and under 1% of adults on 10 mg reported hallucinations. In an 8-week trial in children aged 6 to 17 with ADHD, hallucinations were reported by 7% on zolpidem and none on placebo, and dizziness by 23.5% against 1.5% [13]. On eszopiclone 3 mg, confusion was reported by 3% and hallucinations by 3% against 0 on placebo over 6 weeks, and memory impairment by 1.3% (8 of 593) against 0 over 6 months [7]. The zolpidem label also describes out-of-character aggressiveness, bizarre behavior, agitation and depersonalization, and postmarketing reports of delirium [13]. In people aged 60 and over, adverse cognitive events were 4.78 times more common on sedative hypnotics than placebo (95% CI 1.47 to 15.47) [5].
- Population
- Adults in zolpidem and eszopiclone label trials [13][7]; children aged 6 to 17 with insomnia associated with ADHD [13]; 2,417 participants aged 60 or over in 24 studies [5].
- Sources
- [13], [7], [5]
- Caveats
- The label states that memory effects appeared mainly above 10 mg of zolpidem, and that zolpidem is not approved for children [13]. [5] pooled benzodiazepines with the newer drugs.
Falls and fractures in older adults
Linked to more fractures in older adults in three meta-analyses of observational studies, with hip fracture risk about 1.9 to 2.8 times higher.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Z-drugs were associated with more fractures (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.87) and zolpidem with more injuries (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.95 to 2.15). The odds of falls trended higher without reaching significance (OR 2.40, 95% CI 0.92 to 6.27) [22]. Z-drug use was associated with hip fracture (RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.13), about as strongly as benzodiazepines (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.68), and most strongly in short-term use (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.74 to 3.29) [23]. Zolpidem use was associated with fracture at any site (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.03) and hip fracture (RR 2.80, 95% CI 2.19 to 3.58) [24]. In people with dementia, higher-dose Z-drugs were associated with fractures (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.46) and falls (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.66) against non-users with sleep disturbance [25]. In non-US zolpidem trials, 30 of 1,959 people (1.5%) reported falls, 28 of them aged 70 or older, and 23 of those 28 were on doses above 10 mg [13].
- Population
- 14 observational studies, 830,877 people in the fracture analysis [22]; observational studies of hip fracture in older people [23]; 1,092,925 participants in 9 studies [24]; 3,532 people with dementia newly prescribed Z-drugs [25]; 1,959 people in non-US trials [13].
- Sources
- [22], [23], [24], [25], [13]
- Caveats
- Observational and open to confounding, with considerable heterogeneity in the fracture and falls analyses (I² 90% and 95%) [22]. The band above is the fall rate in trials, which had no placebo figure beside it. Minimal or inconsistent excess risk was seen at lower doses in people with dementia [25].
Around non-cardiac surgery
One trial found metoprolol started just before non-cardiac surgery lowered heart attacks and raised deaths, 3.1% against 2.3%, and strokes, 1.0% against 0.5%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Extended-release metoprolol started 2 to 4 hours before surgery and continued 30 days lowered heart attack (4.2% against 5.7% on placebo, HR 0.73) and raised death (3.1% against 2.3%, HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.74) and stroke (1.0% against 0.5%, HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.74) [35]. A slow heart rate (6.6% against 2.4%) and low blood pressure (15% against 9.7%) were more frequent [24].
- Population
- 8,351 people with or at risk of atherosclerotic disease having non-cardiac surgery who were not already taking a beta-blocker [35].
- Sources
- [35], [24]
- Caveats
- One trial, of people newly started on a beta-blocker hours before surgery. It does not describe people already taking one.
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 8,351 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Mood and behavior changes while quitting smoking
One trial found no significant rise in moderate or severe neuropsychiatric events on bupropion, 2.2% against 2.4% on placebo in smokers without psychiatric illness.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In smokers without a psychiatric disorder, moderate and severe neuropsychiatric adverse events occurred in 2.2% on bupropion and 2.4% on placebo (risk difference -0.08, 95% CI -1.37 to 1.21). In smokers with a psychiatric disorder, they occurred in 6.7% and 4.9% (risk difference 1.78, 95% CI -0.24 to 3.81) [6]. The label reports postmarketing cases in people taking bupropion to quit smoking, including depression, mania, psychosis, hallucinations, aggression, suicidal thoughts and suicide. It notes that depressed mood can also be a symptom of nicotine withdrawal [8].
- Population
- 8,144 smokers, 4,116 with and 4,028 without a psychiatric disorder [6].
- Sources
- [6], [8]
- Caveats
- One trial, though a large one. The postmarketing reports have no denominator. In the psychiatric group, the interval for the difference from placebo reached up to 3.8 percentage points.
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 8,144 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Interaction with valproate
The label states valproate more than doubles lamotrigine levels, and rash needing hospitalization occurred in 1% of trial patients taking both against 0.16% without valproate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Valproate raised lamotrigine concentrations slightly more than twofold. In epilepsy trials, 6 of 584 patients (1%) taking lamotrigine with valproate were hospitalized with rash, against 4 of 2,398 (0.16%) without it. In children, serious rash occurred in 1.2% with valproate and 0.6% without [4].
- Population
- Adults and children in epilepsy trials and volunteers [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Not randomized by valproate use.
Tizanidine: hallucinations
The label reports formed visual hallucinations or delusions in 5 of 170 people, 3%, in two controlled studies of tizanidine.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Formed, visual hallucinations or delusions were reported in 5 of 170 patients (3%) in two North American controlled studies. Most knew the events were not real. One developed psychosis, and one had problems for at least 2 weeks after stopping [12].
- Population
- 170 people on tizanidine in two controlled studies [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- The label gives no placebo rate.
Baclofen in kidney disease: confusion
Linked to hospital admission with confusion within 30 days in older adults with kidney disease, in 1.11% at 20 mg a day or more against 0.42% at lower doses.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Among older adults with chronic kidney disease newly prescribed baclofen, admission with encephalopathy within 30 days occurred in 1.11% of those started at 20 mg a day or more and 0.42% of those started lower (weighted RR 3.54, 95% CI 2.24 to 5.59). The excess rose as kidney function fell, to 2.90 percentage points at an eGFR below 30. Against non-users, risk was higher at both doses (RR 5.90 and 19.8) [17]. The baclofen label states that the drug is mainly excreted unchanged by the kidneys [14].
- Population
- 15,942 adults aged 66 or older in Ontario with an eGFR below 60 and not on dialysis, and 284,263 non-users [17].
- Sources
- [17], [14]
- Caveats
- Observational, in older adults from one province.
Continued use after surgery
Linked to new persistent opioid use after surgery in about 6% of adults who had not been using opioids, against 0.4% of non-surgical controls.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Among adults not using opioids before surgery, new persistent opioid use followed 5.9% to 6.5% of minor and major procedures, against 0.4% in a control group that had no surgery. Tobacco use, alcohol and substance use disorders, mood disorders, anxiety and pain conditions before surgery were each associated with higher odds [25].
- Population
- 36,177 US adults with insurance claims for surgery, 80.3% of them minor procedures [25].
- Sources
- [25]
- Caveats
- Observational. The study cannot show why opioid use continued.
Depression and anxiety
One trial found depression and anxiety events rose at the top dose, 7% and 8% against 4% and 3% on placebo. The label warns of mood disorders.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Depression-related adverse events occurred in 4% on placebo, 4% on 7.5/46 mg and 7% on 15/92 mg. Anxiety-related events occurred in 3%, 5% and 8% [1]. The Qsymia label carries warnings on suicidal behavior and ideation and on mood and sleep disorders [8].
- Population
- 2,487 adults [1]; label [8].
- Sources
- [1], [8]
- Caveats
- One trial reports these rates by arm.
Depression and mood changes
The injection label reports depression in 3% of women in its trials and warns it may recur or worsen in women with a history of depression.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In the injection's contraception trials, depression and lower libido were each reported by 3%, and anxiety and irritability by 1% [1]. The norethindrone acetate label advises watching women with a history of clinical depression and stopping the drug if it recurs to a serious degree [2].
- Population
- 2,325 women in five injection trials [1].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- No placebo group, so the share caused by the drug is not known [1].
Unpleasant experiences during brief daily breathing exercises
In one trial, 10% of participants reported negative experiences during their daily 5-minute breathing or meditation exercise.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In an optional debriefing at the end of the 1-month trial, 90% of participants reported positive experiences during the exercises and 10% reported negative experiences related to them [4].
- Population
- Adults in a remote trial of breathwork and mindfulness meditation [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The figure covers all four groups together, including mindfulness meditation, and comes from an optional questionnaire [4].
Sleepwalking and sleep-related eating in clinic studies
Linked to complex sleep behaviors in 4.7% of people taking zolpidem across three observational clinic studies, most often sleepwalking and sleep-related eating.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- A systematic review found 69 of 1,454 people taking zolpidem (4.7%) in three observational clinical studies had complex sleep behaviors, and a further 79 patients were described in 23 case reports and 5 case series. Sleepwalking and sleep-related eating were the most common types. About 88% of cases were judged to have a probable association with zolpidem, and events occurred at therapeutic doses [19].
- Population
- 148 patients with zolpidem-associated complex sleep behaviors, 69 of them from three observational studies of 1,454 zolpidem users [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- Observational studies and case reports with no placebo group, so no comparison rate exists. The review found no randomized trials on this question [19].
Use with opioids
Linked to higher mortality in older adults taking a Z-drug with an opioid, at 11.3 against 8.1 out-of-hospital deaths per 1,000 person-years on low-dose trazodone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The zolpidem label states that use with opioids may increase the risk of respiratory depression [13]. Among Medicare beneficiaries taking an opioid at the same time, out-of-hospital deaths occurred at 11.3 per 1,000 person-years on Z-drugs and 8.1 on low-dose trazodone (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.44), and total mortality was also higher (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.49). Without an opioid, out-of-hospital mortality on Z-drugs did not differ from trazodone (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.23) [28].
- Population
- 400,924 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or older starting a hypnotic, with 3,541 person-years of Z-drug use alongside an opioid [28].
- Sources
- [13], [28]
- Caveats
- Observational, with possible unmeasured confounding. The comparison is against another sleep medicine, not against no treatment, and the rates count deaths from any cause outside hospital.
Bleeding in the brain
Shown to cause bleeding inside the skull in 0.63% of people with atrial fibrillation over the trials, about half the 1.40% on warfarin.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- Intracranial bleeding occurred in 0.63% on a standard-dose DOAC against 1.40% on warfarin (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.56) and in 0.42% on a lower dose (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.37) [2]. The trial-level meta-analysis gave a similar result (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.59) [1]. Hemorrhagic stroke occurred at 0.10% a year on dabigatran 150 mg against 0.38% on warfarin [3] and 0.24% a year on apixaban against 0.47% [5].
- Population
- 71,683 participants in four atrial fibrillation trials [2][1].
- Sources
- [2], [1], [3], [5]
- Caveats
- The comparator is warfarin. Against aspirin, intracranial bleeds were 11 on apixaban and 13 on aspirin in one trial [14].
Psychosis and mania
Shown to cause psychotic or manic symptoms in about 0.1% against 0 on placebo in pooled short trials, with new psychosis more frequent on amphetamine than methylphenidate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- The label reports that in a pooled analysis of short-term placebo-controlled trials, psychotic or manic symptoms such as hallucinations, delusional thinking or mania occurred in about 0.1% of people on stimulants and 0 on placebo, including people with no history of psychotic illness [17]. Among adolescents and young adults starting a stimulant for ADHD, new psychosis occurred in 0.21% on amphetamine and 0.10% on methylphenidate (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.09), about 1 in 660 overall [28].
- Population
- Pooled short-term trials summarized in labeling [17]; 221,846 matched adolescents and young adults with 143,286 person-years of follow-up [28].
- Sources
- [17], [28]
- Caveats
- The cohort compared two stimulants with each other, not with no treatment [28]. The label also warns that stimulants may worsen an existing psychotic disorder or bring on a manic episode in people with bipolar disorder [17].
Bleeding in the brain
Shown to raise hemorrhagic stroke slightly on aspirin, 0.04% against 0.03% a year, with intracranial bleeding in 0.4% to 0.5% on either drug over two years.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In primary prevention trials, hemorrhagic stroke occurred at 0.04% a year on aspirin against 0.03% on control [2]. In the head-to-head trial, intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 0.4% on clopidogrel and 0.5% on aspirin [22]. With clopidogrel added to aspirin in acute coronary syndromes, intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 0.1% of each group [22].
- Population
- Primary prevention trials with individual participant data [2]; 19,185 patients followed a mean 1.91 years [3]; 12,562 patients [4].
- Sources
- [2], [22], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The primary prevention difference was of borderline significance (p=0.05) [2].
FDA boxed warning: suicidal thoughts in children, atomoxetine
FDA states atomoxetine raised suicidal thoughts in children and teenagers in short-term trials, 0.4% against none on placebo. No suicides occurred.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In 12 placebo-controlled studies of 6 to 18 weeks, suicidal ideation occurred in 0.4% (5 of 1,357) of children on atomoxetine, including one suicide attempt, against 0% (0 of 851) on placebo, all aged 6 to 12 and all in the first month. A similar analysis in adults found no increase [9]. A meta-analysis found suicidal behavior or ideation in 0.37% of children against 0.07% on placebo, not statistically significant (MHRR 1.57), and 0.11% against 0.12% in adults [10]. In 279,315 young people in Medicaid, suicidal events did not differ between atomoxetine and stimulants (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.92) [11].
- Population
- Over 2,200 children in 12 trials [9]; 3,883 children and 3,365 adults in trials [10]; young people aged 5 to 18 in 26 Medicaid programs [11].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Few events, so intervals are wide [11]. The trials were short, and the label states it is unknown whether the risk extends to longer use [9].
Suicidal thoughts on clonazepam
The clonazepam label carries the antiepileptic class warning: suicidal thoughts or behavior occurred in 0.43% on these drugs against 0.24% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In pooled analyses of 199 placebo-controlled trials of 11 antiepileptic drugs, the risk of suicidal thinking or behavior was about twice that on placebo (adjusted RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.7), with an incidence of 0.43% among 27,863 treated patients against 0.24% among 16,029 on placebo, over a median of 12 weeks [3].
- Population
- 43,892 patients in 199 trials of 11 antiepileptic drugs [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- A class analysis that the label applies to clonazepam. The label does not say whether clonazepam was one of the 11 drugs.
Seizures
The label warns bupropion can cause dose-related seizures, about 1 in 1,000 at up to 300 mg a day and 4 in 1,000 at 300 to 450 mg.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In studies of the sustained-release form at up to 300 mg a day, seizures occurred in about 0.1% of patients. In a prospective follow-up study of the immediate-release form at 300 to 450 mg a day, the incidence was about 0.4% (13 of 3,200). The label states the estimated incidence rises almost tenfold between 450 and 600 mg a day. It lists a seizure disorder, anorexia or bulimia, and abrupt stopping of alcohol, benzodiazepines, barbiturates or antiepileptic drugs as contraindications, and names antipsychotics, other antidepressants, theophylline and systemic corticosteroids as drugs that lower the seizure threshold [8].
- Population
- Patients in sustained-release studies and 3,200 people in an immediate-release follow-up study [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- No placebo rates are given. The incidence with the extended-release form has not been formally measured in trials [8].
Suicidal thoughts and behavior
FDA states antiepileptic drugs as a class raised suicidal thoughts or behavior to 0.43% against 0.24% on placebo, about one extra case per 530 people treated.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In pooled analyses of 199 placebo-controlled trials of 11 antiepileptic drugs, suicidal thinking or behavior occurred in 0.43% of 27,863 people on a drug and 0.24% of 16,029 on placebo (adjusted relative risk 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.7) [19]. In a Swedish cohort comparing periods on and off treatment in the same people, gabapentinoid treatment was associated with suicidal behavior and death from suicide (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.32). Taken separately, pregabalin was associated with increased hazards, and gabapentin with decreased or no significant hazards [24].
- Population
- 43,892 people in 199 trials with a median length of 12 weeks [19]; a Swedish cohort of people prescribed gabapentinoids, of whom 10,026 (5.2%) were treated for suicidal behavior or died from suicide [24].
- Sources
- [19], [24]
- Caveats
- The pooled trials cover 11 antiepileptic drugs, not gabapentin or pregabalin alone. The cohort is observational, and its increased hazards were concentrated in people aged 15 to 24 [24].
Adverse events in trials
Shown at a rate of 0.47% for non-serious adverse events in registered hypnosis trials, with no serious adverse event likely caused by hypnosis.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, the rate of serious adverse events likely attributable to hypnosis was 0%, and the rate of other adverse events was 0.47% [19]. In 8 IBS trials, 1 of 238 people given hypnosis (0.4%) dropped out because of a panic attack [4]. In the largest IBS trial, eight serious adverse events, mostly cancer or inflammatory bowel disease, were judged unrelated to therapy [5]. The Cochrane smoking review found little data on harms, with no sign of any [11]. NCCIH notes it is possible that hypnosis could worsen symptoms in people with some mental health conditions [2].
- Population
- Hypnosis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov [19]. 464 adults with IBS [4]. 354 adults [5].
- Sources
- [19], [4], [5], [11], [2]
- Caveats
- Many registered trials did not report adverse events, and all those analyzed treated medical conditions or procedures, not psychiatric conditions [19].
Suicidal thoughts and behavior (seizure drug class warning)
The label warns that seizure drugs as a group raised suicidal thoughts or behavior to 0.43% against 0.24% on placebo, about one extra case per 530 treated.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In FDA's pooled analysis of 199 placebo-controlled trials of 11 seizure drugs, suicidal thinking or behavior occurred in 0.43% on a drug and 0.24% on placebo (adjusted RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.7), about 1 extra case for every 530 people treated. The rise appeared within a week of starting and lasted through the trials. There were 4 suicides on drug and none on placebo, too few for a conclusion [4].
- Population
- 27,863 people on a seizure drug and 16,029 on placebo, median treatment 12 weeks [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The analysis pools 11 drugs and is not specific to lamotrigine. Most trials lasted no more than 24 weeks [4].
Suicidal thoughts and behavior (seizure drug class warning)
The label warns that seizure drugs as a group raised suicidal thoughts or behavior to 0.43% against 0.24% on placebo, about one extra case per 530 treated.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In FDA's pooled analysis of 199 placebo-controlled trials of 11 seizure drugs, suicidal thinking or behavior occurred in 0.43% on a drug and 0.24% on placebo (adjusted RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.7), about 1 extra case per 530 treated, beginning as early as one week after starting [3]. In the children's migraine trial, one teenager on topiramate made a suicide attempt [5].
- Population
- 27,863 people on a seizure drug and 16,029 on placebo, median treatment 12 weeks [3]; 361 children and adolescents [5].
- Sources
- [3], [5]
- Caveats
- The pooled analysis covers 11 drugs and is not specific to topiramate [3].
FDA boxed warning: suicidal thoughts, viloxazine
FDA states viloxazine raised suicidal thoughts and behaviors, 0.9% of children against 0.4% on placebo, and 1.6% of adults against none.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In short-term trials, 9 of 1,019 children (0.9%) on viloxazine reported suicidal ideation or behavior against 2 of 463 (0.4%) on placebo. In adults, 3 of 189 (1.6%) reported suicidal ideation against 0 of 183. No suicides occurred [6].
- Population
- 1,019 children on viloxazine and 463 on placebo; 189 adults on viloxazine and 183 on placebo [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Small numbers of events.
Mania or hypomania
The label reports symptoms of mania or hypomania in 0.2% of people treated with mirtazapine in controlled trials that mostly excluded bipolar disorder.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- The label states that treating a depressive episode with an antidepressant may precipitate a mixed or manic episode in people with bipolar disorder, and that mania or hypomania was reported in 0.2% of people on mirtazapine in controlled trials [7].
- Population
- Adults in controlled clinical trials [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- No placebo rate is given beside the 0.2%.
Seizures
The label states bupropion can cause seizures, with dose-related risk. Trials found seizures in about 0.1% against 0% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- The label states bupropion can cause seizures, with dose-related risk. Seizure incidence in Contrave trials was about 0.1% against 0% on placebo. It is contraindicated with a seizure disorder [8].
- Population
- Contrave trial participants, summarized in the label [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Few events.
Mania or hypomania
The venlafaxine label reports mania or hypomania in 0.3% of people in depression studies against 0.0% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In premarketing studies of venlafaxine extended release, mania or hypomania was reported in 0.3% vs 0.0% on placebo in depression, 0.0% vs 0.2% in generalized anxiety, 0.2% vs 0.0% in social anxiety and 0.1% vs 0.0% in panic disorder [10].
- Population
- Adults in premarketing studies of venlafaxine extended release [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Small numbers of events, in trials that generally left out people with bipolar disorder.
Mania or hypomania
The label warns that an antidepressant can trigger a manic episode in people with bipolar disorder. Mania or hypomania was reported in 0.4% in sertraline trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In controlled sertraline trials, which generally excluded people with bipolar disorder, symptoms of mania or hypomania were reported in 0.4% of patients on sertraline. The label gives no placebo rate [24].
- Population
- Adults in controlled sertraline trials [24].
- Sources
- [24]
- Caveats
- No comparator rate is given, and the trials mostly left out the people the warning is about.
Seizures
The label reports seizures in 0.1% of people on paroxetine in clinical studies, which excluded people with a history of seizures.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- During clinical studies, seizures occurred in 0.1% of patients treated with paroxetine. The label gives no placebo rate [28]. The sertraline label states the drug has not been studied in people with seizure disorders [24].
- Population
- Adults in paroxetine clinical studies [28].
- Sources
- [28], [24]
- Caveats
- No comparator rate. People with a history of seizures were excluded from the studies.
Serious adverse events, including collapsed lung
Shown in about 1 per 10,000 patients. Two collapsed lungs were recorded among 229,230 patients.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- Serious adverse events occurred in 1.01 per 10,000 patients (95% CI 0.23 to 2.33) and 7.98 per million treatments [21]. Among 229,230 patients, 2 had a pneumothorax, one treated in hospital, and the longest-lasting side effect was a nerve injury of the leg lasting 180 days [22]. An overview of 17 systematic reviews grouped reported serious events into organ or tissue injuries, with a median of 4 deaths per review, and infections [23].
- Population
- 21 prospective studies [21]. 229,230 patients [22]. 17 systematic reviews of adverse events [23].
- Sources
- [21], [22], [23]
- Caveats
- The overview rated the quality of the reviews as mediocre, and case counts in reviews give no rate [23].
Heart attack and stroke
Mixed results: cohort studies found no rise in heart attack or stroke with triptans overall, and one found a rise just after a first prescription in under 0.01% of users.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- The label states that there have been rare reports of serious cardiac reactions, including heart attack, within hours of sumatriptan, that it may cause coronary artery spasm, and that stroke, brain hemorrhage and marked rises in blood pressure have been reported with this drug class. It contraindicates use in coronary artery disease, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, peripheral vascular disease and uncontrolled hypertension [11]. Among people with migraine in the General Practice Research Database, triptan prescription was not associated with stroke (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.65) or heart attack (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.43) [13]. A review of 4 observational studies pooled an odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.43) for serious ischemic events with intense triptan use, and called the stroke evidence conflicting [14]. Among 429,612 people filling a first triptan prescription in Denmark, 11 (0.003%) had a heart attack and 18 (0.004%) an ischemic stroke in the time windows studied, with odds ratios of 3.3 (95% CI 1.0 to 10.9) and 3.2 (95% CI 1.3 to 8.1) for the period just after the prescription [15].
- Population
- 63,575 people with migraine, 13,664 of them prescribed a triptan [13]; 4 observational studies [14]; 429,612 first-time triptan users, median age 38 [15].
- Sources
- [11], [13], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- Observational. People with heart disease are steered away from triptans, which lowers event rates among users. The people with events after a first prescription had a median age of about 60 and a high-risk cardiovascular profile [15].
Stroke and heart attack
Linked to 1.3 to 2.3 times the risk of clot-related stroke and heart attack on pills with 30 to 40 µg ethinyl estradiol, with low absolute rates.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- Overall, thrombotic stroke occurred at 21.4 and heart attack at 10.1 per 100,000 person-years. With 30 to 40 µg ethinyl estradiol, relative risks ranged from 1.5 to 2.2 for stroke and 1.3 to 2.3 for heart attack by progestin. With 20 µg they were 0.9 to 1.7. The vaginal ring carried 2.5 for stroke [17].
- Population
- 1,626,158 Danish women aged 15 to 49, 14,251,063 person-years [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- Observational, one cohort.
Seizures
The label reports 1 seizure among 2,796 people treated with mirtazapine in premarketing trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- One seizure was reported among 2,796 US and non-US patients in premarketing trials. The label states that mirtazapine has not been systematically evaluated in people with seizure disorders [7].
- Population
- 2,796 people in premarketing clinical trials [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- One case, with no placebo comparison.
Use with triptans
Linked to serotonin syndrome rarely: 2 definite cases in 30,928 person-years of triptans taken with an SSRI or SNRI in one health system.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- Among 19,017 people prescribed a triptan together with an SSRI or SNRI, serotonin syndrome was classed as definite in 2, an incidence of 0.6 cases per 10,000 person-years (95% CI 0.0 to 1.5), and 2.3 per 10,000 when 5 possible cases were added [37]. The duloxetine label names triptans among the drugs that increase the risk [18].
- Population
- 19,017 patients in one US health system over 14 years [37].
- Sources
- [37], [18]
- Caveats
- One records-based study that did not separate SNRIs from SSRIs.
Use with triptans
Linked to serotonin syndrome rarely: 2 definite cases in 30,928 person-years of triptans taken with an SSRI or SNRI in one health system.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- Among 19,017 people prescribed a triptan together with an SSRI or SNRI, serotonin syndrome was suspected in 17 and classed as definite in 2, an incidence of 0.6 cases per 10,000 person-years (95% CI 0.0 to 1.5). Counting 5 possible cases as well, the rate was 2.3 per 10,000 person-years [44]. The label names triptans among the drugs that increase the risk [24].
- Population
- 19,017 patients in one US health system over 14 years, 30,928 person-years of combined exposure [44].
- Sources
- [44], [24]
- Caveats
- One records-based study, which depends on cases being recognized and coded. Its authors concluded the risk was low and questioned FDA's 2006 advisory [44].
Serotonin syndrome with antidepressants
The label warns of serotonin syndrome with SSRI or SNRI antidepressants. One study found 2 definite cases among 19,017 people prescribed both.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- The label states that serotonin syndrome may occur with sumatriptan, particularly with SSRIs, SNRIs, tricyclic antidepressants and MAO inhibitors [11]. Among 19,017 people prescribed a triptan together with an SSRI or SNRI over 14 years, serotonin syndrome was suspected in 17 and classified as definite in 2, a rate of 0.6 per 10,000 person-years of exposure (95% CI 0.0 to 1.5), or 2.3 per 10,000 with 5 possible cases added [16].
- Population
- 47,968 people prescribed triptans in one Boston-area health system, 19,017 of them also prescribed an SSRI or SNRI, with 30,928 person-years of exposure [16].
- Sources
- [11], [16]
- Caveats
- One records-based study from one health system, which counts prescriptions and not doses taken together.
FDA boxed warning: complex sleep behaviors
FDA states sleepwalking, sleep-driving and other activities while not fully awake may occur after any dose, with 66 serious cases including 20 deaths identified through early 2018.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- The zolpidem, eszopiclone and zaleplon labels carry the boxed warning. The zolpidem label states that complex sleep behaviors may follow the first or any later use, at labeled doses, with or without alcohol or other central nervous system depressants, that people usually do not remember the events, and that the drug is contraindicated in anyone who has had such an episode [13][7][6]. An FDA review of adverse event reports from December 1992 through February 2018 and the medical literature identified 66 cases, 20 with death and 46 with serious injuries. Fatal cases involved carbon monoxide poisoning, drowning, falls, hypothermia, motor vehicle collisions and apparent suicide. Twenty-two cases reported an earlier episode on a Z-drug [17]. FDA stated these behaviors appear more common with these three drugs than with other prescription sleep medicines [18]. In the preapproval trial database of 3,660 people given zolpidem, somnambulism was listed as rare, meaning fewer than 1 in 1,000 [13].
- Population
- 66 postmarketing cases in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and the literature [17]; 3,660 people in preapproval trials [13].
- Sources
- [13], [7], [6], [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Spontaneous reports have no denominator, and there was no placebo comparison. The band above is the label's trial-database frequency for sleepwalking. Clinic studies found higher rates, shown in the next block.
Falls and fractures
Linked to about 1.4 to 1.6 times the odds of falls in older adults and 1.5 times the risk of hip fracture in observational studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In older adults, benzodiazepine use was associated with falls at an odds ratio of 1.57 (95% CrI 1.43 to 1.72), or 1.41 (95% CrI 1.20 to 1.71) in the adjusted estimate [25]. A later meta-analysis found an odds ratio of 1.42 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.65), with 1.81 for long-acting and 1.27 for short-acting drugs [26]. For hip fracture, the relative risk was 1.52 (95% CI 1.37 to 1.68), and 2.40 (95% CI 1.88 to 3.05) with short-term use [27].
- Population
- 79,081 older participants in 22 studies of 9 drug classes [25]; 248 studies of psychotropic drugs and falls [26]; studies of benzodiazepines and hip fracture in older people [27].
- Sources
- [25], [26], [27]
- Caveats
- Observational, with substantial heterogeneity. Prescribing bias could not be accounted for [26]. The sources give no absolute rates.
Shorter and lighter sleep
Shown to cut total sleep by about 35 to 45 minutes and reduce deep sleep in adults, with effects from doses taken hours before bed.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 24 studies, caffeine reduced total sleep time by 45 minutes and sleep efficiency by 7%, lengthened sleep onset by 9 minutes and wake after sleep onset by 12 minutes, and reduced deep sleep by 11.4 minutes. The authors modeled that 107 mg of coffee caffeine 8.8 hours before bed, or 217.5 mg 13.2 hours before bed, was the point after which total sleep time fell [13]. Across 22 crossover trials (956 healthy adults) measured by polysomnography, caffeine cut total sleep time by 34.67 minutes, sleep efficiency by 4.74 points and slow-wave sleep by 1.01 points, and lengthened sleep onset by 8.35 minutes. REM sleep did not change [14]. In 10 studies of 128 athletes taking caffeine before late afternoon or evening training, sleep efficiency fell 4.87 points (95% CI 2.29 to 7.45), and athletes consistently reported worse sleep [15].
- Population
- Adults in 24 controlled studies [13]. Healthy adults in sleep lab crossovers [14]. Athletes [15].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- The cutoffs are model outputs from pooled data and vary with dose and individual metabolism [3]. In the athlete review, total sleep time fell 32.47 minutes but not significantly (95% CI -69.93 to 4.99), and the sleep efficiency result was not robust to removing single studies [15].
Shorter and poorer sleep with devices at bedtime in children
Linked to about twice the odds of too little sleep in children using phones or tablets at bedtime, and to shorter, later sleep in 90% of studies reviewed.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Bedtime device use was linked to inadequate sleep (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.32), poor sleep quality (OR 1.46) and excessive daytime sleepiness (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.61). Having a device in the bedroom without using it was also linked to inadequate sleep (OR 1.79) [9]. A review of 67 studies found screen time adversely linked to sleep, mainly shorter duration and later timing, in 90% of them [10].
- Population
- 125,198 children aged 6 to 19, mean age 14.5, in 20 cross-sectional studies [9]. School-aged children and adolescents in 67 studies [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Observational and mostly cross-sectional, with self-reported screen time and sleep. Children who sleep poorly may reach for devices, which is reverse causation. Heterogeneity was high (I² 90% for sleep quantity) [9].
Depression
Linked to slightly more depression with more screen time in two meta-analyses, and to well-being differences too small to matter for policy in three large youth datasets.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In children and adolescents, higher screen time was linked to depression (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.22). The link was J-shaped: against no screen time, risk was lower below 2 hours a day, lowest at 1 hour (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.93) [12]. A second review found a pooled OR of 1.28 with high heterogeneity (I² 89%). The link was seen in females (OR 1.18) and not in males [13]. In three large datasets, digital technology use explained at most 0.4% of the variation in adolescent well-being [14].
- Population
- 127,714 young people in 16 studies, 12 of them cross-sectional [12]. 12 cross-sectional and 7 longitudinal studies [13]. 355,358 adolescents in three datasets [14].
- Sources
- [12], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Observational and mostly cross-sectional. Low mood can lead to more screen use, which is reverse causation. Results depended heavily on how screen time and the reference group were defined [13][14].
Long sleep linked to stroke and death
Linked to higher stroke and death rates in people sleeping long hours, in two meta-analyses of cohorts. The rise grew with each extra hour.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Long sleepers had a 46% higher stroke risk (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.69) and a 39% higher death rate (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.47) than people with normal sleep duration, with a linear rise as sleep lengthened [4]. Each hour over 7 was linked to 18% more stroke (RR 1.18) and 13% more deaths (RR 1.13) against people sleeping 7 to 8 hours [1].
- Population
- 5,134,036 participants in 137 cohorts [4]. 3,582,016 participants in 67 articles [1].
- Sources
- [4], [1]
- Caveats
- Observational. Long sleep often follows illness, depression or low activity, so reverse causation may explain much of the link. No trial has tested shortening sleep in long sleepers.
Evening chronotype linked to depression
Linked to more depression in evening types in three meta-analyses, mostly cross-sectional, with about 80% higher odds and a small correlation with symptom severity.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Eveningness was linked to more severe depressive symptoms, a small effect (Fisher's z -0.20, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.23) [5]. Evening types had higher odds of depression than morning types (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.88) [6]. Evening chronotype was linked to depression in cross-sectional studies (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.38), and not significantly in cohorts (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.59 to 5.46). Morning preference was linked to lower risk in cohorts (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96) [13].
- Population
- 15,734 people in 36 studies [5]. 377,797 participants in 39 studies, 37 cross-sectional [6]. 22 studies, 20 cross-sectional and 2 cohorts [13].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [13]
- Caveats
- Observational and mostly cross-sectional, so direction is unknown: depression itself can delay sleep timing, which is reverse causation. Heterogeneity was very high (I² 91.1% to 97.3%) [13].
Social jet lag linked to depression
Linked to more depressive symptoms with social jet lag in three meta-analyses, a weak correlation, with higher odds at 2 hours or more than at 1 to 2 hours.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Social jet lag correlated with depressive symptoms (r 0.049, 95% CI 0.044 to 0.054), explaining 0.24% of the variance, with no consistent link to anxiety [7]. In young people, 2 hours or more was linked to depressive symptoms (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.77), and 1 to 2 hours was not significantly (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.09) [8]. In adolescents and young people, 1 to 2 hours (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.20) and over 2 hours (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.02) were linked to depression, and social jet lag was also linked to anxiety [9].
- Population
- 25 observational studies [7]. 8 studies of people aged 10 to 24 [8]. 164,529 participants in 14 studies [9].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Observational and mostly cross-sectional. The certainty of evidence was rated very low in one review [9]. Depressed mood can disturb sleep timing, which is reverse causation.
Stroke
Linked to higher stroke risk in a pooled analysis of current drinkers and in genetic studies, which found no protective effect at moderate intake.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among current drinkers, each 100 g a week was linked to higher stroke risk (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.17), heart failure (HR 1.09) and fatal hypertensive disease (HR 1.24) [4]. In Chinese men, genetically predicted intake was linked to higher risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (RR 1.58 per 280 g a week, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.84) and ischemic stroke (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.43), with no U-shaped dip. Self-reported moderate drinking had looked protective in the same cohort [7]. Against non-drinkers, pooled cohorts found no difference in incident stroke (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.06) [2].
- Population
- 599,912 current drinkers [4]. 512,715 Chinese adults, 161,498 genotyped [7]. 17 cohorts for incident stroke [2].
- Sources
- [4], [7], [2]
- Caveats
- Few women in the Chinese cohort drank, so the genetic results are for men [7].
Less REM sleep
Shown to delay and shorten REM sleep from about two standard drinks, worsening with dose, in pooled studies of healthy adults.
The numbers and sources
Older adults (Beers Criteria)
The 2023 Beers Criteria list amitriptyline and nortriptyline as drugs for older adults to avoid, because they are highly anticholinergic, sedating and cause low blood pressure on standing.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The American Geriatrics Society lists antidepressants with strong anticholinergic activity, including amitriptyline and nortriptyline, as ones to avoid in adults 65 and older, rating the evidence high quality and the recommendation strong. It also lists tertiary tricyclics such as amitriptyline among drugs to avoid in people with fainting, because they raise the risk of low blood pressure on standing [16]. The label states older adults are particularly sensitive to anticholinergic effects, including confusion, delirium and urinary retention, and may be at greater risk of falls [13].
- Population
- Adults aged 65 and older, in an expert panel review of the evidence [16]; labeling statement [13].
- Sources
- [16], [13]
- Caveats
- A guideline listing, not a measured rate.
Hearing loss with long-term azithromycin
Linked to hearing loss when azithromycin was taken long-term to prevent COPD flare-ups, often reversible. The label lists hearing loss and tinnitus.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In COPD prophylaxis trials, azithromycin was associated with significant hearing loss in the treatment group, in many cases reversible or partly reversible [14]. The label lists hearing loss, deafness and tinnitus among reported reactions [18].
- Population
- COPD trial participants [14]; postmarketing reports [18].
- Sources
- [14], [18]
- Caveats
- The review abstract gives no rate.
FDA boxed warning: use with opioids
FDA states that taking benzodiazepines with opioids may cause profound sedation, slowed breathing, coma and death. Studies linked the combination to about twice the overdose risk.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warning states that concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioids may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma and death [18]. Among privately insured opioid users, also using a benzodiazepine was associated with an emergency visit or admission for opioid overdose (adjusted OR 2.14, 95% CI 2.05 to 2.24) [20]. Among veterans receiving opioids, a current benzodiazepine prescription was associated with death from drug overdose (HR 3.86, 95% CI 3.49 to 4.26), rising with benzodiazepine dose [21]. FDA reported that 55% of overdose deaths involving benzodiazepines from 2013 to 2017 also involved prescription opioids [22].
- Population
- US privately insured opioid users from 2001 to 2013 [20]; US veterans receiving opioid analgesics, 112,069 of them also prescribed benzodiazepines [21]; US death records summarized by FDA [22].
- Sources
- [18], [20], [21], [22]
- Caveats
- Observational studies. The sources give relative risks and counts, not the rate among people taking both.
Road crashes and driving
Linked to a 60% to 80% higher risk of traffic accidents in observational studies, and to impaired driving in experimental studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Benzodiazepine use was associated with traffic accidents in case-control studies (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.31) and cohort studies (rate ratio 1.81, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.43), and with being responsible for the accident (OR 1.41). The association was weaker in drivers over 65 (OR 1.13) than in younger drivers (OR 2.21). In experimental studies, anxiolytics taken in the daytime impaired driving performance whatever their half-life [28].
- Population
- Epidemiological and experimental studies of benzodiazepines and driving [28].
- Sources
- [28]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis. The accident studies are observational and give no absolute rate.
Dementia
Mixed results: two meta-analyses linked benzodiazepine use to 1.4 to 1.5 times the dementia risk, while a prospective cohort found none at the highest exposure.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Ever use was associated with dementia at an odds ratio of 1.39 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.59), and 1.30 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.48) in studies that ignored use in the 5 or more years before diagnosis [29]. An earlier meta-analysis found a risk ratio of 1.49 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.72) for ever users [30]. In a prospective cohort, the hazard ratio was 1.25 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.51) at the lowest level of use and 1.07 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.39) at the highest, and higher use was not associated with faster cognitive decline [31].
- Population
- 159,090 cases in 15 studies [29]; 45,391 participants in 6 studies [30]; a population cohort followed a mean 7.3 years, 797 of whom developed dementia [31].
- Sources
- [29], [30], [31]
- Caveats
- Observational. Early dementia can cause anxiety and poor sleep, so use may follow the disease. The cohort authors concluded their results did not support a causal link [31].
Side effects in trials
Reported side effects included flatulence, nausea and headache, with no major health risks across 54 studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 54 studies, reported adverse events of oral bromelain included flatulence, nausea and headache, and no major health risks were reported [8]. Adverse events in the knee osteoarthritis trial were generally mild [6].
- Population
- People in clinical studies of bromelain [8]. 47 adults with knee osteoarthritis [6].
- Sources
- [8], [6]
- Caveats
- The abstract gives no adverse event rates [8].
Headache, racing heart, gut upset and anxiety
Shown to raise racing heart, anxiety, insomnia, gut upset and headache in athletes, with several rising with dose.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 48 placebo-controlled trials in 940 athletes (mean dose 4.9 mg per kg), caffeine raised the odds of self-reported tachycardia (log odds ratio 1.47, more than 4 times the odds), anxiety (1.29), insomnia (1.20), abdominal discomfort (1.12), increased urine output (1.04), nervousness (0.82) and headache (0.74). Tachycardia, headache, abdominal discomfort and anxiety rose with dose [17]. A systematic review of 27 studies in healthy people found anxiety symptoms rose with caffeine dose [18].
- Population
- Athletes aged 15 and older, 63% male [17]. Healthy individuals [18].
- Sources
- [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Side effects were self-reported and often secondary outcomes [17]. The anxiety review's search ran to March 2021 and its statistical methods were not fully reported [18].
Pure and highly concentrated caffeine powders
FDA states pure or highly concentrated caffeine products have been linked to at least two US deaths, and seizures can occur with rapid intake of about 1,200 mg.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The FDA states pure or highly concentrated caffeine products have been linked to at least two US deaths and treats some as adulterated [21]. It estimates seizures can occur with rapid intake of about 1,200 mg, less than half a teaspoon of pure caffeine [12]. A Maryland medical examiner series found 8 caffeine deaths from 1999 to 2009, average postmortem concentration 140.4 mg/L, none from caffeine-containing foods [22].
- Population
- US consumers [12][21]; 8 adult deaths [22].
- Sources
- [12], [21], [22]
- Caveats
- Case series and regulatory statements, not trials. Two of the 8 deaths were suicides and the others involved large amounts of tablets or other medications [22].
Drug interactions
Shown to raise clobazam levels by about 60% in children with epilepsy, and to change levels of several other antiepileptic drugs.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 13 children taking clobazam, CBD raised clobazam levels by a mean 60% and its active metabolite by 500% at 4 weeks, and side effects in 10 of 13 eased when clobazam was reduced [13]. In 81 adults and children, rising CBD doses raised serum topiramate, rufinamide and N-desmethylclobazam and lowered clobazam. AST and ALT were higher in those also taking valproate [14].
- Population
- People with refractory epilepsy [13][14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Open-label studies at prescription doses. Except for clobazam and its metabolite, the level changes stayed within accepted therapeutic ranges [14].
Neck artery tears and stroke after neck manipulation
Linked to artery tears and stroke in adults under 45 in case-control studies. Case-crossover studies found the same link with doctor visits, attributed to tears already present.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In Ontario, people under 45 with a vertebrobasilar stroke were 5 times as likely as matched controls to have seen a chiropractor in the week before (95% CI 1.32 to 43.87) [16]. In a US case-control study, vertebral artery dissection was associated with spinal manipulation in the previous 30 days (OR 6.62, 95% CI 1.4 to 30), after adjusting for neck pain [17]. In 818 vertebrobasilar strokes over more than 100 million person-years, people under 45 were about 3 times as likely to have seen a chiropractor, and also a primary care doctor, before their stroke. The same held when each case was compared with their own earlier periods, and there was no excess risk with chiropractic care over primary care [18]. In 15,523 carotid strokes, associations with chiropractic and primary care visits were similar [19]. In 1,829 US strokes, chiropractic visits were not significantly associated with vertebrobasilar stroke [20]. A meta-analysis of 6 studies found a small association between chiropractic care and dissection (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.41), at very low quality, and no convincing evidence of causation [21]. The American Heart Association states that most population studies found an association in young patients, that it is unclear whether this reflects unrecognized existing dissections or trauma from manipulation. It advises informing patients of the association before neck manipulation [22].
- Population
- 582 cases and 2,328 controls in Ontario [16]. 51 patients with dissection and 100 controls under 60 [17]. 818 vertebrobasilar strokes [18]. 15,523 carotid strokes [19]. 1,829 strokes in US health plans [20]. 6 studies [21].
- Sources
- [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]
- Caveats
- Dissection itself causes neck pain and headache, the symptoms that bring people to a chiropractor, so people may arrive with a tear already forming. Billing records do not show whether manipulation was actually given [20]. Neither study design can give the number of strokes caused per treatment, and no rate has been established [22].
Serious adverse events overall
Serious events are rare in published estimates, from 1 per 2 million manipulations to 13 per 10,000 patients, and none was reported in trials of acute back pain.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A scoping review of 250 articles found serious adverse event estimates ranging from 1 per 2 million manipulations to 13 per 10,000 patients, including spinal or neurological problems and cervical artery strokes [23]. No trial of acute low back pain reported a serious adverse event [6]. In older adults, stroke of any type within 7 days was 1.2 per 1,000 after chiropractic visits and 1.4 per 1,000 after primary care visits for neck pain (HR 0.39), and slightly higher at 30 days (HR 1.10) [24]. In one chronic back pain trial, a safety board judged one serious adverse event possibly related to manipulation [3].
- Population
- 250 articles [23]. 26 trials [6]. 1,157,475 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 [24]. 47 trials [3].
- Sources
- [23], [6], [24], [3]
- Caveats
- The estimates span two frequency bands and come from different designs. The reviewers write that incidence and cause are hard to establish [23].
Mercury and the developing brain
FDA and EPA advise limiting mercury in pregnancy and childhood. In newer cohorts at lower exposure, pooled IQ loss per unit of mercury did not reach significance.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The FDA and EPA state it is important to limit mercury in the diets of those who are pregnant or breastfeeding and of children, and grade fish by mercury level [1]. A 2026 meta-analysis reports that an earlier pooling of three highly exposed cohorts (16.8 to 27.2 µg/L methylmercury in maternal blood) found IQ decrements. Pooling five newer cohorts at 0.60 to 12.8 µg/L, it found a change of -0.407 IQ points per µg/L of maternal blood (95% CI -0.962 to 0.147) [18]. A review of low-level exposure found possible effects on fetal growth in susceptible subgroups and on infant growth, and neurologic effects that may differ by age, sex and timing of exposure [19]. Another review found that DHA appears beneficial for, and low-level methylmercury may adversely affect, early neurodevelopment [20].
- Population
- 7 populations from 5 cohorts, children tested at 3.5 to 12 years [18]. Human studies with a biomarker of mercury exposure, excluding very highly exposed groups [19].
- Sources
- [1], [18], [19], [20]
- Caveats
- Exposure was measured as mercury in blood or hair, not as fish eaten. Nutrients in the same fish may offset the effect or confound the studies [19].
Children's IQ and brain development
Linked to lower IQ in children at higher exposures, such as water above 1.5 mg/L. Reviews disagree on any link below that level.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The US National Toxicology Program concluded, with moderate confidence, that higher estimated fluoride exposures, such as drinking water above the WHO guideline of 1.5 mg/L, are consistently associated with lower IQ in children. 18 of 19 high-quality studies found an inverse association. It found the evidence in adults gave low confidence, and stated that more studies are needed on lower exposures [13]. A 2025 meta-analysis of 74 studies found lower IQ with higher exposure (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.33, 59 studies, 20,932 children). For drinking water, the association was null below 1.5 mg/L across all studies and stayed inverse below 1.5 mg/L in low risk of bias studies. IQ fell 1.63 points per 1 mg/L of urinary fluoride (95% CI -2.33 to -0.93, 13 studies) [14]. A 2023 meta-analysis of 8 studies from areas without endemic fluorosis found no difference in IQ between water fluoride at levels used for community water fluoridation and lower levels (SMD 0.07, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.17) [15]. Another 2023 meta-analysis found IQ 4.68 points lower at the highest against lowest exposure, and 3.05 points lower per 1 mg/L of water fluoride above 1 mg/L, up to 2 mg/L. The association was strongest in high risk of bias studies, and the one low risk of bias study found no effect [16].
- Population
- Children in 72 IQ studies [13], 74 studies, 45 in China [14], 8 studies in areas without endemic fluorosis [15] and 33 studies [16]. All observational.
- Sources
- [13], [14], [15], [16]
- Caveats
- These are cross-sectional and cohort studies, not trials. The NTP monograph does not address oral health benefits [13]. 52 of the 74 studies in the 2025 analysis were at high risk of bias [14]. Residual confounding could not be ruled out [16]. The reviews disagree at exposures below 1.5 mg/L [14][15][16].
Depression
Mixed results: a national cohort linked hormonal birth control to more antidepressant use, highest in teens, while randomized trials found no worsening of depressive symptoms in adult women.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against non-users, first antidepressant use was higher on combined pills (RR 1.23), progestin-only pills (RR 1.34), the patch (RR 2.0), the ring (RR 1.6) and the levonorgestrel IUD (RR 1.4), and higher in adolescents on combined pills (RR 1.8) [20]. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials found no worsening of depressive symptoms against placebo (median SMD -0.04) [21].
- Population
- 1,061,997 Danish women aged 15 to 34 followed 6.4 years [20]; 5,833 women in 12 trials [21].
- Sources
- [20], [21]
- Caveats
- The cohort is observational [20]. The trials rarely enrolled first-time or adolescent users [21].
Hunger
Shown to raise hunger ratings against calorie-matched diets in adults with overweight or obesity, in a pooled analysis of 4 trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Hunger rose against calorie-matched control diets (MD 2.05, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.64, I² 0%) [20]. A systematic review of 16 studies found higher appetite at bedtime and lower or unchanged appetite in the morning [21].
- Population
- 323 adults with overweight or obesity in 4 trials [20]; adults on windows of 12 hours or less [21].
- Sources
- [20], [21]
- Caveats
- Only 4 trials were pooled, and the abstract does not name the hunger scale [20].
Light at night linked to sleep disturbance
Linked to 27% more sleep disturbance in people with the most light at night in one meta-analysis of observational studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against low or no light at night, the highest exposure group had more sleep disturbance (pooled prevalence ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.45). The certainty of the evidence was rated high, although most studies had a high risk of bias in how exposure was assessed [7].
- Population
- 765,838 participants in 15 studies, 691,851 in the 10 pooled [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Observational. Outdoor light from satellites does not measure light in the bedroom. People who sleep poorly may turn on lights, which is reverse causation.
Light at night linked to depression
Linked to 22% higher odds of depression with more light at night in one meta-analysis. In older adults, bedroom light of 5 lux or more predicted new depressive symptoms.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Higher light at night was linked to higher odds of depression (OR 1.224, 95% CI 1.176 to 1.275) [14]. Older adults whose measured bedroom light averaged 5 lux or more had more new depressive symptoms than those in darker rooms (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.89, adjusted for sleep and health) [9].
- Population
- 8 observational studies [14]. 863 adults with a mean age of 71.5 in Nara, Japan, followed a median 24 months [9].
- Sources
- [14], [9]
- Caveats
- Observational with few studies and moderate to high heterogeneity [14]. People with poor sleep or low mood may leave lights on, which is reverse causation.
Hearing loss and ringing in the ears
Linked to temporary deafness and ringing in the ears at high furosemide doses, about four times the risk in pooled trials. The labels warn of hearing loss.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- High-dose furosemide raised the risk of temporary deafness and tinnitus (RR 3.97, 95% CI 1.00 to 15.78) [11]. The furosemide label reports tinnitus and reversible or irreversible hearing loss, usually with rapid injection, severe kidney impairment, doses above those on the label, low blood protein or aminoglycoside antibiotics [10]. The torsemide label states hearing loss is usually reversible [1].
- Population
- 849 patients in 9 trials [11]; label statements [10][1].
- Sources
- [11], [10], [1]
- Caveats
- The interval in [11] reaches 1.00, and neither source gives a rate.
Heart disease and stroke
Shown to raise stroke on estrogen plus progestin, 8 more per 10,000 women a year, with early heart risk also higher. Risk rose most in women 70 and older.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the 2002 report of estrogen plus progestin, hazard ratios were 1.29 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.63) for coronary heart disease and 1.41 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.85) for stroke, or 7 more heart events and 8 more strokes per 10,000 person-years [4]. Over the full treatment phase the coronary HR was 1.18 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.45). With estrogen alone it was 0.94 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.14) [5]. In WHI women with moderate or severe hot flashes, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease did not differ from placebo at ages 50 to 59 (HR 0.85 on estrogen alone, 0.84 on estrogen plus progestin) but rose at 70 and older (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.59, and 3.22, 95% CI 1.36 to 7.63) [15]. On estrogen plus progestin, coronary risk was similar to placebo with untreated LDL under 130 mg/dL (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.10) and more than doubled at 190 mg/dL or higher (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.42 to 5.40) [16].
- Population
- 16,608 women with a uterus and 10,739 women after hysterectomy, aged 50 to 79 [4][5]; secondary analyses of the same 27,347 women [15][16].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Women aged 50 to 59 on estrogen alone had more favorable results for heart attack than older women [5]. The hot flash and lipid results are secondary analyses of subgroups [15][16].
Dementia and Alzheimer disease
Mixed results: one trial found more dementia from 65 on estrogen plus progestin, while observational studies linked earlier, shorter use to lower Alzheimer risk.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- During estrogen plus progestin treatment, the WHI reported more dementia in women aged 65 and over [5]. A meta-analysis of mostly observational studies linked estrogen plus progestogen (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.21) and progestogen alone (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.17) to higher Alzheimer risk. Use for 3 to 5 years (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.93) and starting within 5 years of menopause (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.99) were linked to lower risk in cohort studies [18]. Ten years after a 4-year trial in recently menopausal women, amyloid on PET and brain MRI measures did not differ from placebo [19].
- Population
- WHI trial participants aged 50 to 79 [5]; 7,710,379 women in 3 RCTs, 12 cohort and 16 case-control studies [18]; 266 women followed after the KEEPS trial [19].
- Sources
- [5], [18], [19]
- Caveats
- The WHI abstract lists dementia without event counts [5]. The meta-analysis associations come mainly from observational designs [18]. The KEEPS follow-up measured brain scans, not dementia [19].
Napping and cognitive impairment or dementia
Mixed results: one meta-analysis linked napping, especially over 30 minutes, to more cognitive impairment and dementia. Another found no link over time with global cognition or memory in older adults.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Napping was linked to dementia (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.21). Naps longer than 30, 45 and 60 minutes a day were linked to 35%, 41% and 40% higher odds of cognitive impairment [17]. In longitudinal studies of adults over 60, napping was not linked to global cognition (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.18) or memory (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.19) [18].
- Population
- 20 reports [17]. 95,719 participants over 60 in 25 studies, 7 longitudinal [18].
- Sources
- [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational. Dementia disturbs the sleep and wake rhythm years before diagnosis, so long daytime sleep may be an early sign rather than a cause.
With benzodiazepines, gabapentin and other sedating drugs
Linked to about twice the odds of an overdose visit when opioids were taken with benzodiazepines, and to more opioid-related deaths with gabapentin.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among opioid users, concurrent benzodiazepine use was associated with an emergency room visit or admission for opioid overdose (adjusted OR 2.14, 95% CI 2.05 to 2.24) [29]. Among opioid users in Ontario, gabapentin in the prior 120 days was associated with opioid-related death (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.88). Concurrent NSAID use was not (adjusted OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.32) [30]. Concurrent skeletal muscle relaxants were associated with opioid overdose (combined HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.48), more with baclofen (1.83, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.04) [31]. The boxed warning states that use with benzodiazepines or other central nervous system depressants, including alcohol, may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma and death [20].
- Population
- 315,428 privately insured US adults who filled an opioid prescription [29]; 1,256 opioid-related deaths and 4,619 matched controls [30]; incident and prevalent opioid user cohorts [31].
- Sources
- [29], [30], [31], [20]
- Caveats
- Observational. None of the studies gives the share of people on a combination who overdosed.
Dementia
Mixed results: one 2026 meta-analysis linked use to about 18% higher dementia risk in older adults, two others found no significant link, and a 3-year trial found no difference.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 18 observational studies, the pooled dementia risk ratio was 1.14 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.33, I² 99%), higher in people 65 or older (RR 1.21) [26]. Across 23 longitudinal studies in older adults, the pooled hazard ratio was 1.18 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.37), and risk did not differ from H2 blocker users (HR 1.04) [27]. A 2020 meta-analysis of 12 studies found no association (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.15) [28]. In a randomized trial, dementia did not differ from placebo over a median 3 years [19].
- Population
- More than 6.3 million participants in 18 studies [26]; older adults without dementia in 23 studies [27]; 8 cohort and 4 case-control studies [28]; 17,598 adults in a randomized trial [19].
- Sources
- [26], [27], [28], [19]
- Caveats
- The observational studies were prone to confounding, exposure misclassification and immortal time bias [26]. Dementia develops over years, longer than the trial ran.
Dizziness
Shown to raise dizziness by about two thirds in people with type 2 diabetes, more at age 60 and under. Headache did not differ.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In type 2 diabetes, dizziness was more common on tirzepatide (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.57). Headache did not differ (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.55) [27].
- Population
- 10,615 patients in 12 RCTs [27].
- Sources
- [27]
- Caveats
- Subgroup analysis suggested higher risk at age 60 and under [27].
Regulator actions in Australia and the Netherlands
Australia's TGA states neuropathy risk cannot be excluded below 50 mg a day and requires a warning above 10 mg. The Netherlands capped supplements at 21 mg.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Australia's TGA has required a peripheral neuropathy warning on medicines with more than 10 mg of vitamin B6 a day since March 2022. From 1 June 2027, oral products with more than 50 mg and up to 200 mg per daily dose become Pharmacist Only Medicines, and those above 200 mg still need a prescription. The TGA states that the risk of neuropathy cannot be excluded below 50 mg a day. As of 31 October 2025, its adverse event database held 250 reports of peripheral neuropathy and related conditions for products containing vitamin B6 [14]. In October 2026 it opened a consultation on stronger warning statements and clearer labeling of the presence and amount of B6 [15]. The Netherlands lowered the maximum daily dose in supplements to 21 mg from October 2018. Of 224 Dutch neuropathy reports through 2023, only one after that date mentioned a dose well above 21 mg, and reports per period fell from the second half of 2019 [16].
- Population
- Products sold in Australia [14][15]; spontaneous reports in the Netherlands [16].
- Sources
- [14], [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Spontaneous reports cannot give a rate. Dutch reports describing neuropathy at lower doses continued after 2018, and the authors call for study of low-dose products [16].
Hemorrhagic stroke
Shown to raise hemorrhagic stroke about 22%, one extra per 1,250 people, while lowering ischemic stroke, one fewer per 476.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 5 trials reporting it, vitamin E raised hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.48) and lowered ischemic stroke (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99). That is one extra hemorrhagic stroke for every 1,250 people taking it and one ischemic stroke prevented per 476 [3]. In the Physicians' Health Study II, hemorrhagic stroke rose (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.91) [1].
- Population
- 118,765 participants in 9 trials [3]; 14,641 male physicians [1].
- Sources
- [1], [3]
- Caveats
- Dose and health status did not explain differences between trials [3].
Withdrawal symptoms and rebound insomnia
Mixed results: sleep worsened on the first night after stopping in some trials, while 12 months of nightly zolpidem did not produce rebound insomnia in one small trial.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In zolpidem trials, fatigue, nausea, flushing, lightheadedness, crying, vomiting, stomach cramps, panic attack and nervousness were each reported by 1% or less within 48 hours of switching to placebo. The label reports no measured rebound insomnia at labeled doses, and self-rated worse sleep on the first night in older adults above 5 mg [13]. With the extended-release form, a rebound effect was seen only on the first night after abrupt stopping [15]. After 44 nights of eszopiclone 2 mg, time to fall asleep and time awake in the night were worse than placebo on the first night off and not on the second. Withdrawal events such as anxiety, abnormal dreams and nausea were each reported by 2% or less [7]. In a meta-analysis of sleep laboratory studies, rebound insomnia on the first withdrawal night was mild with zolpidem and intense with triazolam [4]. Across 12 months of nightly zolpidem 10 mg with placebo substituted at months 1, 4 and 12, rebound insomnia was not observed. About 30% to 40% of participants met the definition of a rebounder, at the same rate in the placebo group [27]. The label also lists convulsions and delirium within the withdrawal syndrome reported for sedative hypnotics, and seizures were reported in two people in zaleplon trials [13][6].
- Population
- Adults in zolpidem and eszopiclone label trials [13][15][7]; 1,276 people in 75 sleep laboratory studies [4]; 33 adults with primary insomnia aged 32 to 65 [27].
- Sources
- [13], [15], [7], [4], [27], [6]
- Caveats
- The labels give only an upper bound for each withdrawal symptom and no placebo rate, so no band can be set. The 12-month trial had 17 people on zolpidem and excluded anyone with a psychiatric disorder or history of drug or alcohol abuse [27].
Use with SSRIs and serotonin syndrome
Limited evidence: 5-HTP raised hormone markers of serotonin activity more in people taking fluoxetine. No study counting serotonin syndrome with this combination was found.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In healthy men, a single 200 mg dose of 5-HTP augmented the prolactin and cortisol response to 20 mg of citalopram [7]. In patients with depression or OCD, 5-HTP raised cortisol and prolactin more in those taking fluoxetine than in those on tricyclics or no drug [8]. The study authors used these hormone responses as a marker of increased serotonin-mediated activity [7]. No case series or trial counting serotonin syndrome with 5-HTP and SSRIs was located in Europe PMC searches.
- Population
- Healthy Asian men [7]. Patients with depression or OCD [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- Hormone markers are not clinical outcomes. A 12-week trial combined 5-HTP 200 mg a day with fluoxetine up to 60 mg a day, and its abstract does not report adverse events [5].
Hunger
One trial found higher hunger scores on 5:2 than on daily calorie restriction over a year.
The numbers and sources
With lithium
Linked to lithium toxicity, with hospital admission about 7.6 times as likely in the month after an older adult on lithium started an ACE inhibitor.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among older adults taking lithium, admission for lithium toxicity was more likely within a month of starting an ACE inhibitor (RR 7.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 22.0) [31]. The lisinopril label states that lithium toxicity has been reported with ACE inhibitors and was usually reversible when both drugs were stopped [3].
- Population
- 10,615 Ontario residents aged 66 and older on lithium, of whom 413 (3.9%) were admitted for lithium toxicity over 10 years [31].
- Sources
- [31], [3]
- Caveats
- Observational, with a wide interval. The 3.9% is for all lithium users over 10 years, not for the combination.
Use in pregnancy
Mixed results: cohort studies linked use in pregnancy to slightly more autism and ADHD in children, and a sibling comparison in the same cohort found no link.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a Swedish cohort, risk at age 10 without and with exposure in pregnancy was 1.33% against 1.53% for autism, 2.46% against 2.87% for ADHD and 0.70% against 0.82% for intellectual disability. Without sibling control, ever-use was associated with autism (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.08) and ADHD (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.10). Comparing full siblings, there was no association with autism (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.04), ADHD (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.02) or intellectual disability (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10), and no dose response [26]. In September 2025 FDA began a label change to reflect evidence suggesting that use in pregnancy may be associated with a higher risk of conditions such as autism and ADHD. FDA stated that a causal relationship has not been established, that contrary studies exist, and that acetaminophen is the only over-the-counter drug approved to treat fever in pregnancy [27]. The over-the-counter label directs pregnant or breastfeeding users to ask a health professional before use [19].
- Population
- 2,480,797 children born in Sweden from 1995 to 2019, of whom 185,909 (7.49%) were exposed during pregnancy [26].
- Sources
- [26], [27], [19]
- Caveats
- Observational. The FDA statement names the Nurses' Health Study II and the Boston Birth Cohort among studies that found an association, and those were not read for this page [27].
FDA boxed warning: abuse, misuse and addiction
FDA states prescription stimulants have a high potential for abuse and misuse, which can lead to a substance use disorder including addiction, and to overdose and death.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The amphetamine, lisdexamfetamine and methylphenidate labels carry this boxed warning. It states that misuse and abuse of central nervous system stimulants can result in overdose and death, and that the risk rises with higher doses and with unapproved methods of administration such as snorting or injection. The labels state that the drugs can be diverted for non-medical use, and all are Schedule II controlled substances [17][18][21][10].
- Population
- Labeling statement for the class [17].
- Sources
- [17], [18], [21], [10]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate. Survey figures are in the next block.
Withdrawal and dependence
The label states stimulants may produce physical dependence and tolerance, with low mood, fatigue, vivid dreams, sleep changes and increased appetite after abrupt stopping. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that withdrawal signs after abrupt stopping or dose reduction following prolonged use include dysphoric mood, depression, fatigue, vivid and unpleasant dreams, insomnia or hypersomnia, increased appetite, and psychomotor slowing or agitation. It also states the drug may produce tolerance [17].
- Population
- Labeling statement for central nervous system stimulants [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- No rate and no trial of stopping after prescribed use is given in the label.
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that serotonin syndrome may occur when amphetamines are taken with other drugs acting on serotonin. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The amphetamine label names MAOIs, SSRIs, SNRIs, triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone and St. John's wort, and states that drugs blocking the liver enzyme CYP2D6 may raise amphetamine exposure and add to the risk [17]. The lisdexamfetamine label carries the same warning [18]. The methylphenidate label lists serotonin syndrome in combination with serotonergic drugs among postmarketing reports [21].
- Population
- Labeling statements [17][18][21].
- Sources
- [17], [18], [21]
- Caveats
- A label warning with no denominator.
Seizures
The label states there is some clinical evidence that stimulants may lower the seizure threshold, mainly in people with earlier seizures or EEG abnormalities. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The amphetamine label states that stimulants may lower the convulsive threshold in people with a history of seizures, in people with earlier EEG abnormalities, and very rarely in people with neither [17]. The methylphenidate label lists convulsions among postmarketing reports [21].
- Population
- Labeling statements [17][21].
- Sources
- [17], [21]
- Caveats
- No rate or trial data are given.
Interaction with opioids and sedatives
One small trial found alcohol deepened oxycodone's slowing of breathing by a further 19%. Alcohol was involved in about a fifth of US opioid and benzodiazepine deaths.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Oxycodone 20 mg cut resting breathing by 28%, and an alcohol infusion reaching 1 g/L cut it by a further 19%, with more pauses in breathing. Older volunteers were more affected [19]. In US data from 2010, alcohol was involved in 22.1% of opioid pain reliever deaths and 21.4% of benzodiazepine deaths [20]. Alcohol was involved in 14.7% of all opioid overdose deaths in 2017 [21]. A review lists opioids, benzodiazepines, barbiturates and sleep medicines among drugs whose effects on the brain alcohol enhances [22].
- Population
- 12 young and 12 older opioid-naive volunteers [19]. US emergency visits and deaths in 13 states [20]. 399,230 US opioid deaths from 1999 to 2017 [21].
- Sources
- [19], [20], [21], [22]
- Caveats
- Death records show alcohol was involved, not that it caused the death.
Dementia
Mixed results: one large cohort linked tamsulosin to 17% higher dementia risk, while a network meta-analysis of five studies found no link for alpha-blockers.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In Medicare data, dementia incidence was 31.3 per 1,000 person-years on tamsulosin against 25.9 with no BPH drug (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.21), and higher than on doxazosin, terazosin or alfuzosin [25]. A Bayesian network meta-analysis found neither alpha-blockers nor 5-alpha reductase inhibitors significantly linked to dementia against no treatment [26].
- Population
- 253,136 men aged 65 or older with BPH on tamsulosin, with matched comparison groups, median follow-up 19.8 months [25]; 3,650,434 patients in 5 studies [26].
- Sources
- [25], [26]
- Caveats
- Observational studies, with short follow-up in [25]. Dementia can take years to be diagnosed, so early diagnoses after starting a drug are hard to attribute.
Stroke in a national cohort (alpha-GPC)
Linked to about 43% more strokes over 10 years in South Koreans aged 50 and over prescribed alpha-GPC, with risk rising with longer use.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among 12,008,977 South Koreans aged 50 and over, the 108,877 prescribed alpha-GPC had more strokes over 10 years after matching (total stroke aHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.46; ischemic aHR 1.34; hemorrhagic aHR 1.37). Risk rose with longer prescription duration [11].
- Population
- Adults 50 and over without prior stroke or Alzheimer's disease, followed 2009 to 2018 [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. People prescribed alpha-GPC may differ from non-users in ways matching did not capture. No randomized trial has tested this.
Nausea, vomiting and dizziness
One trial found nausea, vomiting and vertigo rose with dose from 600 to 1,800 mg a day over 5 weeks.
Overdose
Linked to more deaths per overdose than other antidepressants: tricyclics had a case fatality rate ratio of 13.8 against 0.5 for SSRIs in England and Wales.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Comparing deaths with non-fatal self-poisonings, tricyclic antidepressants had a case fatality rate ratio of 13.8 (95% CI 13.0 to 14.7), against 2.5 for venlafaxine, 1.9 for mirtazapine and 0.5 for SSRIs. Dosulepin and doxepin were more toxic than amitriptyline [18]. The label states that overdose can cause cardiac dysrhythmias, severe low blood pressure, convulsions and coma, and that deaths may occur [13].
- Population
- UK prescriptions, poisoning deaths in England and Wales, and non-fatal self-poisonings at six hospitals, 2000 to 2006 [18].
- Sources
- [18], [13]
- Caveats
- Observational. People prescribed tricyclics may differ from those prescribed other drugs [18].
Serotonin syndrome and MAOIs
The label warns of serotonin syndrome with other serotonergic drugs and lists MAOIs as a contraindication, after hyperpyretic crises, convulsions and deaths with the combination.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Serotonin syndrome has been reported with tricyclics alone and particularly with triptans, other tricyclics, SSRIs, SNRIs, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone and St. John's Wort. Use with MAOIs for psychiatric disorders is contraindicated, as is starting amitriptyline during linezolid or intravenous methylene blue. Hyperpyretic crises, severe convulsions and deaths have occurred with tricyclics and MAOIs taken together [13].
- Population
- Reports summarized in the label [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- No rate is given.
Alcohol and sedating drugs
The label warns that amitriptyline may enhance the effects of alcohol, barbiturates and other sedating drugs, which raises the danger of an overdose.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states amitriptyline may enhance the response to alcohol and the effects of barbiturates and other central nervous system depressants, that this may raise the danger of a suicide attempt or overdose, and that delirium has been reported with disulfiram [13].
- Population
- Labeling statement [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- No rate is given.
Glaucoma, urinary retention and seizures
The label warns that amitriptyline's atropine-like action can trigger angle-closure glaucoma and urinary retention, and lists caution in people with seizures. It gives no rates.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Pupil widening may trigger an angle-closure attack in people with narrow angles, and even average doses may precipitate an attack in people with angle-closure glaucoma. The label calls for caution in people with a history of seizures or urinary retention [13].
- Population
- Labeling statements [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- No rates are given.
Mania in bipolar disorder
The label warns that depressed people with bipolar disorder may shift to mania or hypomania, and that amitriptyline is not approved for bipolar depression.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that treating a depressive episode with an antidepressant alone may raise the chance of a mixed or manic episode in people at risk of bipolar disorder, that people with schizophrenia may have more psychotic symptoms, and that rare mania has occurred 2 to 7 days after stopping long-term treatment [13].
- Population
- Labeling statements [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- The label states the link is not established in controlled trials [13].
Symptoms after stopping
The label reports nausea, headache and malaise after abrupt stopping, and irritability, restlessness and sleep disturbance during gradual reduction. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- After prolonged use, abrupt cessation may produce nausea, headache and malaise. Gradual dose reduction has been reported to produce transient irritability, restlessness and dream and sleep disturbance within two weeks. The label states these symptoms are not a sign of addiction [13].
- Population
- Labeling statement [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- No rate is given.
Doxycycline: sunburn, swallowing irritation and pressure in the head
The doxycycline label warns of exaggerated sunburn, irritation and ulcers of the esophagus, and raised pressure inside the skull, which can threaten vision.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label reports photosensitivity as an exaggerated sunburn reaction, advises enough fluid to reduce esophageal irritation and ulceration, and reports intracranial hypertension with headache, blurred or double vision and possible permanent vision loss, noting overweight women of childbearing age as at higher risk [23].
- Population
- Label statements [23].
- Sources
- [23]
- Caveats
- No rates given.
Impaired driving (diphenhydramine)
One simulator trial found a 50 mg dose of diphenhydramine impaired driving more than alcohol, while fexofenadine driving matched placebo. Feeling drowsy did not predict impairment.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Coherence in following a lead vehicle was worse after diphenhydramine than after alcohol or fexofenadine, and lane keeping was impaired after diphenhydramine and alcohol. Overall driving was poorest after diphenhydramine. Self-rated drowsiness did not predict loss of coherence [14].
- Population
- 40 licensed drivers aged 25 to 44 with seasonal allergic rhinitis, in a 4-period crossover trial [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- One simulator study with single doses [14].
Overdose of diphenhydramine
FDA warns that taking more diphenhydramine than the label directs can cause serious heart problems, seizures, coma or death, after teenagers were harmed in a social media challenge.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- FDA stated that taking more than the label directs can lead to serious heart problems, seizures, coma or death, and that it was aware of teenagers ending up in emergency rooms or dying after a challenge promoted in TikTok videos [16]. The over-the-counter sleep-aid label limits use to one dose in 24 hours and warns against combining it with any other diphenhydramine product [13].
- Population
- Reports reviewed by FDA [16].
- Sources
- [16], [13]
- Caveats
- No denominator.
Dementia and strong anticholinergic drugs
Mixed results: one cohort linked heavy use of strong anticholinergics, often first-generation antihistamines, to 1.54 times the dementia risk. Another study did not list antihistamines among linked classes.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In older adults, the most commonly used strong anticholinergics were tricyclic antidepressants, first-generation antihistamines and bladder antimuscarinics. Against non-use, the highest cumulative use (over 1,095 standard daily doses) was associated with dementia (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.96), with a dose-response trend [17]. A nested case-control study found significant associations for anticholinergic antidepressants, antiparkinson drugs, antipsychotics, bladder antimuscarinics and antiepileptics, and did not list antihistamines among them [18].
- Population
- 3,434 adults aged 65 and older followed a mean 7.3 years [17]; 284,343 case patients and matched controls, mean age 82 [18].
- Sources
- [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational studies of anticholinergic drugs as a group. Neither abstract gives a separate estimate for diphenhydramine.
Interactions with alcohol, sedatives, ritonavir and fruit juice
The labels warn that alcohol and other sedatives add to antihistamine drowsiness, ritonavir raised cetirizine levels by 42%, and fexofenadine's label says not to take it with fruit juice.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The levocetirizine label states alcohol and other central nervous system depressants may further reduce alertness, and that ritonavir raised cetirizine exposure by about 42% [1]. The fexofenadine label says not to take it with fruit juices or at the same time as aluminum or magnesium antacids [12]. The diphenhydramine sleep-aid label asks people taking sedatives or tranquilizers to consult a doctor and to avoid alcohol [13].
- Population
- Labeling statements and pharmacokinetic studies [1][12][13].
- Sources
- [1], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- No rate of harm is given.
With lithium
The label warns that raised lithium levels and lithium toxicity have been reported when lithium is taken with an ARB. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The losartan label states that increases in serum lithium concentrations and lithium toxicity have been reported during use of lithium with angiotensin II receptor antagonists [10].
- Population
- People taking lithium with an ARB, as described in the label [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Based on reports, with no rate or comparison group.
Mania, psychosis and aggression
The labels warn that atomoxetine can cause psychotic or manic symptoms in people without such history, and that both drugs can trigger mania in people at risk.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The atomoxetine label states hallucinations, delusional thinking or mania can be caused by the drug at labeled doses, and that there is evidence it may cause or worsen aggression or hostility [9]. The viloxazine label warns of activation of mania or hypomania [6].
- Population
- Labeling statements [9][6].
- Sources
- [9], [6]
- Caveats
- No rates are given.
Stroke in older people with dementia
The label reports more strokes and transient ischemic attacks, some fatal, on aripiprazole than placebo in trials of older people with dementia. It gives no rate here.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In three placebo-controlled trials in dementia-related psychosis, mean age 84, cerebrovascular adverse events were more frequent on aripiprazole than placebo, with a significant dose-response relationship in the fixed-dose trial [10]. The quetiapine label reports the same finding for risperidone, aripiprazole and olanzapine in older people with dementia [3].
- Population
- Older people with dementia-related psychosis in three aripiprazole trials [10].
- Sources
- [10], [3]
- Caveats
- The label passage read for this page gives no percentages. The evidence is for aripiprazole and two other drugs, not quetiapine.
Compulsive urges on aripiprazole
Case reports: the label describes intense urges, particularly for gambling, and also for sex, shopping and binge eating, in people taking aripiprazole. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The aripiprazole label states that postmarketing case reports suggest people can experience intense urges, particularly for gambling, and an inability to control them. Compulsive sexual urges, shopping, and binge or compulsive eating were reported less often [10].
- Population
- Postmarketing case reports [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Reports with no denominator. The evidence is for aripiprazole.
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome
The label warns of neuroleptic malignant syndrome, a potentially fatal reaction reported with antipsychotic drugs including quetiapine. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The quetiapine label states that a potentially fatal symptom complex called neuroleptic malignant syndrome has been reported with antipsychotic drugs, and that rare cases have been reported with quetiapine [3].
- Population
- Reports summarized in labeling [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- The label says "rare" without a frequency, so no band can be set.
Alcohol and sedating drugs
The label reports quetiapine strengthened the cognitive and motor effects of alcohol in a trial, and that sedation was greater when aripiprazole was combined with lorazepam.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Quetiapine potentiated the cognitive and motor effects of alcohol in a clinical trial in people with psychotic disorders, and the label urges caution with other centrally acting drugs [3]. With aripiprazole and the benzodiazepine lorazepam together, the intensity of sedation was greater than with aripiprazole alone [10].
- Population
- Interaction studies summarized in labeling without counts [3][10].
- Sources
- [3], [10]
- Caveats
- The labels give no numbers for the size of the added effect.
Gastrointestinal side effects and headache
Small trials found more frequent stools, cramps, nausea and headaches on bacopa than placebo, with no serious reactions.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 98 older Australians, bacopa caused more frequent stools, abdominal cramps and nausea than placebo [7]. In 54 older adults, adverse events were 9 on bacopa and 10 on placebo, mainly stomach upset [6]. In 101 adults aged 40 to 70, self-reported adverse reactions were more frequent on bacopa than placebo (p = 0.024), mainly digestive complaints and headaches, with no serious reactions [5].
- Population
- Trial participants over 55 [6][7]. Adults aged 40 to 70 [5].
- Sources
- [7], [6], [5]
- Caveats
- Three small 12-week trials.
FDA boxed warning: abuse, misuse and addiction
FDA states that benzodiazepine use exposes people to abuse, misuse and addiction, which can lead to overdose or death. It calls the exact addiction risk uncertain.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warning states that abuse and misuse commonly involve other medicines, alcohol or illicit substances, which is associated with more serious outcomes [18]. FDA's review reported that an estimated 5.4 million people in the US aged 12 and older misused benzodiazepines in 2018, and that about half a million adults were estimated to have a benzodiazepine use disorder in 2015 to 2016. Overdose deaths involving benzodiazepines rose from 1,298 in 2010 to 11,537 in 2017, and 2.7% of the 2017 deaths involved benzodiazepines alone [22].
- Population
- US national surveys, poison center data and death records summarized by FDA [22].
- Sources
- [18], [22]
- Caveats
- Population counts, not rates among people prescribed the drugs. FDA wrote that the exact risk of addiction with benzodiazepine use is uncertain [22].
Alcohol and other sedating drugs
Linked to a 7.7 times higher accident risk when benzodiazepines and alcohol were taken together. The label states their sedating effects add up.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Taking benzodiazepines and alcohol together was associated with a 7.7-fold increase in traffic accident risk (OR 7.69, 95% CI 4.33 to 13.65) [28]. The label states that benzodiazepines produce additive central nervous system depressant effects with other depressants, naming alcohol, psychotropic medicines, anticonvulsants and antihistamines [18].
- Population
- Epidemiological studies of drivers [28].
- Sources
- [28], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational. The estimate does not separate the effect of alcohol alone from the combination.
Long-term use
FDA reported that about half of people dispensed a benzodiazepine in 2018 received it for two months or longer. Labels state use beyond 4 months has not been assessed.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- FDA estimated that 50% of patients dispensed oral benzodiazepines in 2018 received them for two months or longer [22]. The lorazepam and diazepam labels state that use beyond 4 months has not been assessed in systematic studies [7][8]. The alprazolam label states that spontaneous reports suggest dependence is more likely and more severe at doses above 4 mg a day and beyond 12 weeks, and describes anxiety returning between doses in people on maintenance treatment [18]. In trials of 13 weeks or more, anxiety scores did not differ from placebo [13].
- Population
- US prescription data summarized by FDA [22]; 1,228 people in 8 longer trials [13].
- Sources
- [22], [7], [8], [18], [13]
- Caveats
- Prescription data show how long people take the drugs, not what happened to them. The dependence, memory and dementia findings are in their own blocks.
Low sodium and seizure at high dose
Case reports: a woman who raised her dose to 1,000 mg a day had a seizure with low sodium after 3 weeks, which resolved after stopping.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A 38-year-old woman who raised her Boswellia serrata dose from 200 mg to 1,000 mg a day was admitted to intensive care after 3 weeks with a first generalized seizure. She had syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion with low sodium and rhabdomyolysis. It resolved after treatment and stopping boswellia [9].
- Population
- One case report [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- A single case. She had a recent vaccination and existing neurological symptoms [9].
Mania, psychosis and confusion
The label reports delusions, hallucinations, psychosis, paranoia and confusion in people treated for depression, and warns of triggering mania. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that depressed patients treated with bupropion have had delusions, hallucinations, psychosis, concentration disturbance, paranoia and confusion, some of them with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, and that symptoms eased in some cases when the dose was lowered or the drug withdrawn. It also states that antidepressant treatment can precipitate a manic or hypomanic episode [8]. In immediate-release trials, confusion was reported by 8% against 5% on placebo and hostility by 6% against 4% [8].
- Population
- Reports and immediate-release trials summarized in labeling [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate for psychosis or mania.
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication, within 14 days in either direction, because of an increased risk of hypertensive reactions.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that bupropion blocks the reuptake of dopamine and norepinephrine and that use with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor is contraindicated because of an increased risk of hypertensive reactions. It applies the same to the antibiotic linezolid and intravenous methylene blue. It cites animal studies in which the MAOI phenelzine increased bupropion's acute toxicity [8].
- Population
- Labeling statement [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate in people.
Alcohol
The label reports rare postmarketing cases of neuropsychiatric events or lower alcohol tolerance in people drinking while on bupropion. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label describes rare postmarketing reports of adverse neuropsychiatric events or reduced alcohol tolerance in people who drank alcohol during treatment. It lists abrupt stopping of alcohol as a contraindication and excessive alcohol use as a condition that raises seizure risk [8].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports summarized in labeling [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Voluntary reports from a population of unknown size.
Levodopa and amantadine
The label reports nervous system toxicity, including restlessness, tremor and unsteady walking, when bupropion was taken with levodopa or amantadine.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that central nervous system toxicity has been reported when bupropion was given with levodopa or amantadine, with restlessness, agitation, tremor, ataxia, gait disturbance, vertigo and dizziness. It presumes the cause is the combined dopamine effect of the drugs [8].
- Population
- Reports summarized in labeling [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- No denominator.
Misuse
Case reports: snorting or injecting bupropion has been described almost only in people with a substance use history. A review called misuse uncommon.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A systematic review of misuse cases found that insufflation and intravenous injection occurred almost exclusively in people with a history of substance use disorder. The most frequent effect at presentation was a fast heart rate, followed by seizures, and injection caused skin infection and tissue damage [25]. A second review concluded that misuse occurs in practice and is uncommon, and that bupropion lacks some reinforcing effects of other stimulants [27]. The label reports mild amphetamine-like activity after a single 400 mg dose in people experienced with drugs of abuse [8].
- Population
- Published cases of bupropion misuse [25]; preclinical, clinical and postmarketing studies [27].
- Sources
- [25], [27], [8]
- Caveats
- No denominator, so no rate. Bupropion is not a controlled substance [8].
Falls in older adults
One trial found the rate of falls was highest when bupropion was added to an existing antidepressant in adults aged 60 and older.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among older adults with treatment-resistant depression assigned to added aripiprazole, added bupropion or a switch to bupropion, the rate of falls was highest with added bupropion [11].
- Population
- 619 adults aged 60 and older, 206 of them assigned to added bupropion [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One trial with no placebo arm. The abstract gives no fall rates.
Symptoms after stopping
Case reports: anxiety, irritability, poor sleep, aches and, in one patient, acute dystonia followed stopping bupropion. No study giving a rate was located.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A 32-year-old man treated for nicotine dependence had irritable mood, anxiety, sleeplessness, headache and generalized aches after stopping bupropion abruptly [28]. A patient with major depression had acute dystonia, with trouble swallowing, jaw clenching and a twisted neck, twice after abrupt stops, once when switched to duloxetine and once after two missed doses, and it resolved with bupropion restarted or biperiden [29]. A 36-year-old woman had body aches, drowsiness, dizziness, anxiety and agitation 2 days after stopping 150 mg a day of the extended-release form, with no other cause found on blood tests and a viral panel. Symptoms stopped within 2 days of restarting it [30].
- Population
- Single case reports [28][29][30].
- Sources
- [28], [29], [30]
- Caveats
- Case reports cannot give a rate or prove cause. The 2024 report describes such reports as rare and notes that bupropion's half-life of 12 to 30 hours may delay symptoms by several days [30].
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication, within 14 days in either direction, citing reports of raised blood pressure and a risk of serotonin syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states there have been reports of elevated blood pressure when buspirone was added to a regimen including a monoamine oxidase inhibitor, and lists the combination as contraindicated because of an increased risk of serotonin syndrome, elevated blood pressure or both. It applies the same to the antibiotic linezolid and intravenous methylene blue [4].
- Population
- Reports summarized in labeling [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- No rate is given.
Serotonin syndrome
The label reports serotonin syndrome with buspirone, mostly when taken with other serotonergic drugs such as SSRIs, SNRIs or triptans. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that potentially life-threatening serotonin syndrome has been reported with serotonergic drugs including buspirone, alone but particularly with other serotonergic drugs including triptans, with MAOIs, or with antipsychotics and other dopamine antagonists. Serotonin syndrome also appears among voluntary reports since marketing [4].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports summarized in labeling [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Voluntary reports with no denominator.
Restlessness and movement symptoms
The label reports a syndrome of restlessness soon after starting in a small fraction of patients, and rare voluntary reports of movement disorders.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that controlled trials did not identify significant antipsychotic-like activity, and that a syndrome of restlessness appearing shortly after the start of treatment has been reported in a small fraction of patients. Voluntary reports since marketing include rare cases of dystonia, parkinsonism, akathisia, dyskinesia and restless leg syndrome [4].
- Population
- Controlled trials and postmarketing reports summarized in labeling [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- No rate is given, and the label says cause has not been established for the voluntary reports.
Harms in infants and children
Case reports: 9 serious events, including brain bleeding and paralysis, and 20 delayed diagnoses were reported after spinal manipulation in children.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A review of 13 studies found 14 direct adverse events in children, 9 of them serious, including subarachnoid hemorrhage and paraplegia. Another 20 cases involved delayed diagnosis of conditions such as diabetes, neuroblastoma and meningitis [25]. A later review found 5 case reports of severe harm after high-velocity thrusts in 4 infants and 1 child, and mild, transient harms after gentle mobilizations [12].
- Population
- Children aged 18 or younger in 13 studies [25]. 26 studies in infants, children and adolescents [12].
- Sources
- [25], [12]
- Caveats
- Neither causation nor incidence can be drawn from these reports [25]. The later reviewers write that severe harms were scarce, poorly described and likely tied to missed underlying disease [12].
Rebound high blood pressure on stopping
The labels warn that stopping clonidine or guanfacine suddenly can cause a rapid rise in blood pressure, with rare reports of brain swelling from hypertension, stroke and death.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Sudden cessation of clonidine has caused nervousness, agitation, headache and tremor with a rapid rise in blood pressure and raised catecholamines, more likely after high doses or with continued beta-blocker treatment. Rare hypertensive encephalopathy, stroke and death have been reported [13]. The guanfacine label reports clinically significant, persistent rebound hypertension after abrupt stopping, including hypertensive encephalopathy [7]. In a small patch trial, no rebound was seen after stopping [2].
- Population
- Adults with hypertension and children with ADHD, in label reports [13][7]; 15 adults on a clonidine patch [2].
- Sources
- [13], [7], [2]
- Caveats
- The labels give no rate. No studies of abrupt stopping in children with ADHD were done [6].
Alcohol and sedating drugs
The labels warn that clonidine and guanfacine may add to the sedation of alcohol, barbiturates, benzodiazepines and other sedating drugs.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Clonidine may potentiate the central nervous system depressant effects of alcohol, barbiturates and other sedating drugs [13]. The ADHD labels advise considering additive sedation with phenothiazines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines and other central depressants [6][7].
- Population
- Labeling statements [13][6][7].
- Sources
- [13], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- No rates are given.
Shorter sleep
One randomized trial found 36 fewer minutes of nightly sleep on days people drank caffeinated coffee than on days they avoided caffeine.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Nightly sleep was 397 minutes on coffee days and 432 minutes on caffeine-free days (mean difference 36 minutes, 95% CI 25 to 47), measured by wrist accelerometer [23].
- Population
- 100 adults, mean age 39, 51% women, each randomized day by day for 14 days [23].
- Sources
- [23]
- Caveats
- One trial. Pooled trials of caffeine and sleep are on the caffeine page.
Daytime sleepiness during sleep restriction
Mixed results: one uncontrolled study found sleepiness and slower reactions in the first weeks of sleep restriction, while a trial found no rise in excessive sleepiness afterward.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 16 patients, measured total sleep time fell by 91 minutes on the first night of sleep restriction, 78 minutes on night 8 and 69 minutes on night 22. Attention lapses and sleepiness scores rose during treatment and returned to baseline by 3 months [19]. In 150 postmenopausal women, the odds of being excessively sleepy after sleep restriction (OR 0.94) or CBT for insomnia (OR 0.62) did not differ from the odds of not being sleepy [16].
- Population
- 16 patients, 10 of them women, no control group [19]. 150 postmenopausal women with insomnia [16].
- Sources
- [19], [16]
- Caveats
- The first study was small and uncontrolled. The trial measured sleepiness after treatment, not during the first weeks [16].
Hypomania or mania in mood disorder trials
In mood disorder trials, 2 of 17 people on creatine had hypomania or mania.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a systematic review of 5 RCTs in major depressive disorder and bipolar depression, 2 of 17 participants on creatine experienced hypomania or mania [13].
- Population
- 238 participants with a mental disorder, 126 on creatine and 112 on placebo, mean age 36 [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Small numbers. The abstract does not say which trials the 17 participants came from or give a placebo rate [13].
Burns, scars, infection and skin damage
Case reports: burns, blisters, lasting skin discoloration, scars and infections after cupping, and rare bleeding inside the skull after cupping on the scalp.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- NCCIH lists persistent skin discoloration, scars, burns and infections, worsening of eczema or psoriasis, and rare bleeding inside the skull after scalp cupping, and notes that shared equipment used without sterilization can spread hepatitis B and C [1]. A review of case reports from 2000 to 2011 found 10 adverse events tied to cupping [15]. Published cases include burns from cupping [16].
- Population
- Case reports [15][16].
- Sources
- [1], [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Case reports give no rate.
FDA boxed warning: stopping early raises the risk of clots and stroke
FDA states that stopping any oral anticoagulant early, without another anticoagulant in its place, increases the risk of thrombotic events.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warning on all four labels states that premature discontinuation of any oral anticoagulant increases the risk of thrombotic events [22][23][20][21]. The rivaroxaban label reports that an increased rate of stroke was observed during the transition from rivaroxaban to warfarin in atrial fibrillation trials [23].
- Population
- Boxed warnings in labeling. The stroke observation comes from atrial fibrillation trials of rivaroxaban [23].
- Sources
- [22], [23], [20], [21]
- Caveats
- The label sections read here give no rate.
FDA boxed warning: bleeding around the spine
FDA states that epidural or spinal hematomas may occur with spinal anesthesia or spinal puncture in people on these drugs, and may cause long-term or permanent paralysis.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warning on all four labels describes epidural or spinal hematomas in people receiving neuraxial anesthesia or undergoing spinal puncture, which may result in long-term or permanent paralysis. The listed risk factors include indwelling epidural catheters and use of other drugs that affect clotting, such as NSAIDs, platelet inhibitors and other anticoagulants [22][23][20][21].
- Population
- Boxed warnings in labeling, with no study counts [22][23].
- Sources
- [22], [23], [20], [21]
- Caveats
- The labels give no rate.
FDA boxed warning on edoxaban: less protection with high kidney clearance
FDA states that people with atrial fibrillation and creatinine clearance above 95 mL/min had more ischemic strokes on edoxaban 60 mg than on warfarin.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the pivotal edoxaban trial, the rate of ischemic stroke in people with creatinine clearance above 95 mL/min was higher on edoxaban 60 mg than on warfarin (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.97). In people with clearance above 50 and up to 80 mL/min the rate was lower on edoxaban (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.89). The label states that people with high clearance had lower edoxaban blood levels [21].
- Population
- Subgroups by kidney function within a trial of 21,105 patients [21][6].
- Sources
- [21], [6]
- Caveats
- A subgroup finding from one trial. The evidence is for edoxaban.
Shorter sleep in students
Linked to about twice the risk of short sleep with daily energy drinks in a national survey of 53,266 college and university students.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Daily energy drink use was linked to short sleep duration in men (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.42) and women (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.64 to 2.14). More frequent use was linked to shorter sleep, lower sleep efficiency, longer time to fall asleep and more waking. 4.7% of men and 3.3% of women drank energy drinks daily [12].
- Population
- 53,266 Norwegian students aged 18 to 35 [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Cross-sectional, so it cannot show which came first. Poor sleepers may drink more energy drinks.
Health effects in children and young people
Linked in a systematic review to smoking, alcohol and other substance use, short sleep, low academic performance, ADHD symptoms, suicide risk and dental erosion in people under 21.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 57 studies, energy drink use by children and young people was positively associated with smoking, alcohol use, binge drinking and other substance use, sensation-seeking, short sleep, poor sleep quality and low academic performance. Studies also reported higher risk of suicide, psychological distress, ADHD symptoms, depressive and panic behaviors, insulin resistance, dental caries and erosive tooth wear [13]. The American Academy of Pediatrics states that energy drinks have no place in the diet of children and adolescents [2].
- Population
- Children and young people up to age 21 in 57 studies [13].
- Sources
- [13], [2]
- Caveats
- Mostly observational, and the review calls for longitudinal studies to establish cause [13]. Young people who take more risks may also drink more energy drinks.
Alcohol mixed with energy drinks
Linked to more injury than alcohol alone in a systematic review, and to less sedation and more stimulation in pooled studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Studies that quantified injury risk supported an association between alcohol mixed with energy drinks and increased injury against alcohol only, with substantial variability in methods and outcomes [15]. Alcohol mixed with energy drinks reduced the likelihood of sedation effects and increased stimulatory effects [11].
- Population
- Studies comparing alcohol mixed with energy drinks with alcohol alone [15]. Clinical studies within a review of 32 [11].
- Sources
- [15], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. People who mix the two may differ in drinking habits and risk-taking [15].
Depression and suicidal thoughts
Linked to more suicidality reports in a global adverse event database, most in men under 45 and men using it for hair loss. The label lists depression.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the WHO global adverse event database, finasteride had a reporting odds ratio of 1.63 (95% CI 1.47 to 1.81) for suicidality and 4.33 for psychological adverse events. The signal for suicidality was larger in men under 45 (ROR 3.47) and in men using it for hair loss (ROR 2.06), and was not found in older men treated for prostate enlargement. Reports rose after 2012 [14]. The current label lists depression and suicidal ideation and behavior among postmarketing reports [10].
- Population
- 356 suicidality and 2,926 psychological reports in VigiBase [14].
- Sources
- [14], [10]
- Caveats
- The authors of [14] state the signals may reflect stimulated reporting and/or greater vulnerability in younger men. Reporting ratios measure reporting, not incidence.
Compounded topical finasteride
FDA states it received 32 reports linked to compounded topical finasteride, including sexual and mood effects, most continuing after the product was stopped.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- FDA reported 32 cases in its adverse event reporting system from 2019 to 2024 linked to compounded topical finasteride. Reported events included erectile dysfunction, decreased libido, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, brain fog, fatigue, insomnia and testicular pain, plus local irritation, redness, dryness and burning. FDA states most reports describe events that continued after the product was stopped [6].
- Population
- FDA Adverse Event Reporting System cases, 2019 to 2024 [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Case reports cannot give a rate. The alert concerns compounded products, not the formulations tested in trials.
High folate with low B12
Limited evidence: in older adults with low B12, high blood folate was linked to anemia and cognitive impairment. With normal B12 it went with less impairment.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among older adults with low B12, serum folate above 59 nmol/L was associated with anemia (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 6.6) and cognitive impairment (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.1). With normal B12, high folate went with less cognitive impairment (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.9) [23].
- Population
- 1,459 seniors in the US NHANES survey, 1999 to 2002 [23].
- Sources
- [23]
- Caveats
- Cross-sectional. The authors note that a trial of this question would be unethical [23].
FDA warning: serious breathing problems
FDA states serious breathing difficulties may occur in people taking gabapentin or pregabalin who also use opioids or other sedating drugs, or have reduced lung function.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 2019 FDA warned that serious breathing difficulties may occur in people using gabapentinoids who have respiratory risk factors: use of opioids or other drugs that depress the central nervous system, conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and older age. FDA required new label warnings and required manufacturers to run trials of abuse potential, particularly in combination with opioids [20]. Both labels now state that case reports, human studies and animal studies associate the drug with serious, life-threatening or fatal respiratory depression when taken with central nervous system depressants, including opioids, or with underlying respiratory impairment [19][7].
- Population
- Case reports and studies reviewed by FDA [20].
- Sources
- [20], [19], [7]
- Caveats
- The warning rests largely on case reports, with no rate. This is not a boxed warning.
Use with opioids
Linked to about 49% higher odds of opioid-related death when gabapentin was prescribed alongside an opioid, in one case-control study of opioid users.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among people prescribed opioids in Ontario, 12.3% of those who died of an opioid-related cause (155 of 1,256) and 6.8% of matched controls (313 of 4,619) had been prescribed gabapentin in the previous 120 days. After adjustment, the combination was associated with higher odds of opioid-related death than an opioid alone (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.88), rising to about 1.6 at moderate and high gabapentin doses [21]. The gabapentin label reports respiratory depression and sedation, sometimes resulting in death, with opioids such as morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone and buprenorphine. It states that morphine raises gabapentin levels and that gabapentin lowers hydrocodone exposure [19].
- Population
- 1,256 cases and 4,619 controls among opioid users, 1997 to 2013 [21].
- Sources
- [21], [19]
- Caveats
- Observational. The study gives odds among people already taking opioids, not an absolute rate. The evidence is for gabapentin.
Alcohol and other sedating drugs
The label reports additive effects on thinking and coordination when pregabalin was taken with alcohol, lorazepam or oxycodone, with no important effect on breathing in that study.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a study of repeated doses of pregabalin given with oxycodone, lorazepam or ethanol, no change in drug levels was seen, while effects on cognitive and gross motor functioning added together. No clinically important effects on respiration were seen [7].
- Population
- Volunteers in an interaction study summarized in labeling without counts [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The label gives no numbers. The evidence is for pregabalin.
Symptoms after stopping
The label reports insomnia, nausea, headache, anxiety, sweating and diarrhea after abrupt or rapid stopping of pregabalin, and more seizures in people with epilepsy. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The pregabalin label states that some people reported insomnia, nausea, headache, anxiety, hyperhidrosis and diarrhea after abrupt or rapid discontinuation, which it describes as consistent with physical dependence, and that seizure frequency may rise in people with seizure disorders [7]. The gabapentin label describes rare postmarketing reports of agitation, disorientation and confusion shortly after stopping doses above the labeled range, and states that the dependence potential of gabapentin has not been evaluated in human studies [19].
- Population
- Clinical study and postmarketing reports summarized in labeling [7][19].
- Sources
- [7], [19]
- Caveats
- Neither label gives the share of people affected.
Accidental overdose, injuries and road incidents
Linked to more unintentional overdoses, injuries and road traffic incidents during treatment periods in one Swedish cohort, driven by pregabalin.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Comparing periods on and off treatment in the same people, gabapentinoid treatment was associated with unintentional overdose (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.28), head or body injuries (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.25) and road traffic incidents or offences (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.20). Arrests for violent crime did not clearly differ (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.11). Pregabalin was associated with increased hazards of every outcome, and gabapentin with decreased or no significant hazards [24].
- Population
- A Swedish cohort of people prescribed gabapentinoids, of whom 8.9% had an unintentional overdose and 6.3% a road traffic incident or offence during the study period [24].
- Sources
- [24]
- Caveats
- Observational. The percentages are for the whole study period, on or off treatment, so no rate on the drug can be set.
Bleeding case reports
Case reports: 15 bleeds linked in time to ginkgo, including 8 in the brain. Most people had other bleeding risk factors.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A systematic review found 15 published case reports of bleeding temporally linked to ginkgo, including 8 intracranial bleeds. In 13, other bleeding risk factors were present. Six clearly reported that bleeding did not recur after ginkgo was stopped. Bleeding times, measured in 3 reports, were elevated on ginkgo [10].
- Population
- 15 case reports [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The authors judged the evidence to suggest a possible causal association [10]. Case reports cannot give a rate.
Worsened symptoms when added to clozapine
Limited evidence: added to clozapine, glycine worsened positive symptoms in a small subgroup of trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- When added to clozapine, glycine worsened positive symptoms (SMD +0.56). None of the NMDA modulators tested showed benefit with clozapine [4].
- Population
- Clozapine-treated patients within a meta-analysis of 29 trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Subgroup result with few trials [4].
Higher blood levels of a sleep drug and an anti-anxiety drug
The FDA states grapefruit juice can interact with buspirone. Small trials found it raised buspirone exposure 9.2-fold and triazolam exposure up to 143%, with more drowsiness.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The FDA names buspirone among drugs grapefruit juice can interact with [1]. One glass of regular-strength juice raised triazolam AUC by 53%, and double-strength juice three times a day for days raised it by 143% and lengthened its half-life by 54%, with more subjective drowsiness and a lower digit symbol test score [12]. Double-strength juice raised buspirone AUC 9.2-fold (range 3 to 20.4-fold) and peak concentration 4.3-fold [13].
- Population
- 12 healthy volunteers [12]. 10 healthy volunteers [13].
- Sources
- [1], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Single doses of each drug in healthy volunteers. Only subjective overall drug effect rose with buspirone [13].
Higher blood levels of oxycodone
One small trial found grapefruit juice for 5 days raised oxycodone exposure 1.7-fold, with self-reported performance impaired and pain relief unchanged.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Grapefruit juice, 200 mL three times a day for 5 days, raised oxycodone AUC 1.7-fold, peak concentration 1.5-fold and half-life 1.2-fold against water. Self-reported performance was impaired, and pain relief did not change [16].
- Population
- 12 healthy volunteers in a randomized crossover [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- One trial of a single 10 mg dose in healthy volunteers.
Confusion and other brain effects in older or kidney-impaired people
The labels warn of confusion, delirium, hallucinations and seizures reported in older people and people with reduced kidney function on famotidine, and in severely ill people on cimetidine.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The famotidine label reports confusion, delirium, hallucinations, disorientation, agitation, seizures and lethargy in elderly patients and those with moderate or severe kidney impairment, in whom blood levels are higher [2]. The cimetidine label reports reversible confusional states, mostly in severely ill patients, usually starting within 2 to 3 days and clearing within 3 to 4 days of stopping [14].
- Population
- Reports summarized in labeling [2][14].
- Sources
- [2], [14]
- Caveats
- Reports with no denominator.
Dementia
Limited evidence: a post hoc analysis in one meta-analysis linked H2 blocker use to about 1.44 times the dementia risk in older adults.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of studies in older adults, dementia risk did not differ between proton pump inhibitor and H2 blocker users (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.20). In a post hoc analysis, H2 blocker use itself was associated with dementia (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.93) [20].
- Population
- Older adults without dementia at baseline in 23 longitudinal observational studies [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- A post hoc result from observational studies, prone to confounding [20].
Belladonna toxicity from teething tablets
FDA states it found 99 adverse event cases consistent with belladonna toxicity, including infant deaths and seizures, possibly related to homeopathic teething products.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 2016, an FDA search of its adverse event database identified 99 cases consistent with belladonna toxicity, including reports of infant deaths and seizures, possibly related to teething products. FDA testing found belladonna alkaloids in some teething tablets far exceeding the labeled amounts [2]. In April 2017 the FDA requested a recall of all lots of Hyland's Baby Teething Tablets and Nighttime Teething Tablets, judged the varying alkaloid content "a serious health hazard", and noted that infants' ability to break down and clear belladonna alkaloids is limited [20].
- Population
- Infants given homeopathic teething tablets or gels [2][20].
- Sources
- [2], [20]
- Caveats
- Adverse event reports show a possible link, not proof that the product caused each case, and give no rate [2].
Loss of smell from zinc nasal products
FDA states it had received more than 130 reports of lost sense of smell linked to Zicam homeopathic intranasal zinc products by 2009.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- By 2009 the FDA had received more than 130 reports of anosmia, loss of the sense of smell, associated with Zicam homeopathic intranasal zinc products. FDA determined that use as labeled gave significant daily exposure to intranasal zinc [2].
- Population
- People using intranasal zinc products labeled as homeopathic [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- Report counts, with no denominator.
Heart rhythm and psychiatric case reports
Case reports: fast heart rhythm, hypomania and new psychosis after horny goat weed use.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A published report describes tachyarrhythmia and hypomania with horny goat weed [5]. A 2026 report describes new-onset psychosis in a person with Parkinson's disease after horny goat weed use [6]. A review of sexual enhancement products sold online found horny goat weed reported with adverse events and psychological symptoms such as mood changes, anxiety and hallucinations [7].
- Population
- Case reports [5][6]; review of 203 websites and the medical literature [7].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Abstracts were not available for [5] and [6]. Case reports cannot establish cause.
Driving impairment
One trial found hydroxyzine 50 mg increased lane weaving in an on-road driving test on day 1 and still on day 8 of daily use.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a placebo-controlled crossover study with an on-road highway driving test, hydroxyzine 50 mg once a day significantly increased the standard deviation of lateral position on days 1 and 8. The authors described the impairment as severe after a single dose and only partly reduced with repeated dosing [12]. The label states that drowsiness may occur and cautions against driving or operating dangerous machinery [5].
- Population
- 22 healthy volunteers, 11 women and 11 men [12].
- Sources
- [12], [5]
- Caveats
- One small study in healthy volunteers, in which hydroxyzine was the active control for another antihistamine.
Opioids, alcohol and other sedating drugs
The label states hydroxyzine potentiates central nervous system depressants such as narcotics and barbiturates, and that the effects of alcohol may be increased. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that the potentiating action of hydroxyzine must be considered when it is used with central nervous system depressants such as narcotics, non-narcotic analgesics and barbiturates, that it may potentiate meperidine and barbiturates used around anesthesia, and that the effects of alcohol may be increased [5].
- Population
- Labeling statement [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- No study data are given in the label.
Older adults
The label warns that sedating drugs may cause confusion and over-sedation in older people. European regulators advise against hydroxyzine in older people. Neither gives a rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that sedating drugs may cause confusion and over-sedation in the elderly, and that it has not been determined whether trials included enough people aged 65 and over to detect a difference in response [5]. The European Medicines Agency stated in 2015 that older people are advised not to use hydroxyzine, with a ceiling of 50 mg a day if they do [13].
- Population
- Labeling and regulatory statements [5][13].
- Sources
- [5], [13]
- Caveats
- No trial data in older adults are given.
Tremor and seizures at high doses
The label reports rare instances of tremor and convulsions, usually at doses considerably above the labeled range. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label lists involuntary motor activity, including rare instances of tremor and convulsions, usually with doses considerably higher than those on the label. In overdose it lists hypersedation as the most common sign, along with convulsions, stupor, nausea and vomiting [5].
- Population
- Labeling statement [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- No denominator is given.
Repeated use in young children
Linked to more tic, anxiety and conduct disorder diagnoses by age 10 in children given repeat prescriptions before age 5, in one Canadian cohort.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Compared with a single prescription, repeat prescriptions of hydroxyzine before age 5 were associated with higher odds of a tic disorder (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.96), anxiety (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.70) and disturbance of conduct (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.66) by age 10. ADHD showed a rise that was not significant [16].
- Population
- Children under 5 in British Columbia, Canada, where 1.1% were prescribed hydroxyzine [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- Observational, with no unexposed comparison in the main result. The conditions that lead to repeat prescriptions, such as eczema, may explain part of the association, and the authors called for controlled studies.
False memories during hypnotic recall
A 2025 review reports that using hypnosis to recall past events, called hypnotic regression, has been linked to the creation of false memories.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The review describes hypnotic regression as accused of favoring the creation of false memories, and finds the evidence that hypnosis enhances memory contradictory [20].
- Population
- A narrative review of laboratory and clinical studies [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- A narrative review, not a meta-analysis, and it gives no rate [20].
Low blood sugar in people without diabetes who inject insulin
Case reports: coma from severe low blood sugar has been described in a bodybuilder injecting insulin without diabetes. No rate is known.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A case report describes a 30-year-old male bodybuilder who presented in a coma from severe hypoglycemia needing repeated glucose infusions, later traced to concealed insulin injections [20]. A review of anabolic hormone use lists the side effects of insulin used this way and notes that users are reluctant to volunteer information [17].
- Population
- One case report [20] and a narrative review [17].
- Sources
- [20], [17]
- Caveats
- Case reports have no denominator.
Disordered eating
Linked to higher eating disorder symptoms in two observational studies of young adults, while trials of time-restricted eating found no change on eating disorder questionnaires.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a systematic review of 16 studies, disordered eating questionnaires did not change with time-restricted eating. Qualitative findings included fear of hunger and eating in the absence of hunger [21]. Among 2,762 Canadian adolescents and young adults, 47.7% of women and 38.4% of men reported intermittent fasting in the past year, and it was associated with eating disorder psychopathology in every gender group [22]. In 491 Chinese adults followed for 8 months, current or past intermittent fasting was associated with higher eating disorder psychopathology at follow-up [23].
- Population
- Trial and qualitative studies of adults [21]; observational surveys [22][23].
- Sources
- [21], [22], [23]
- Caveats
- The surveys are observational and cannot show whether fasting led to symptoms or the reverse [22][23].
Tetracycline antibiotics and vitamin A supplements
The label warns against taking tetracyclines with isotretinoin, because raised pressure in the skull occurred in cases, some on both. It also warns against vitamin A supplements.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Isotretinoin has been linked to cases of intracranial hypertension, some involving tetracyclines, with headache, nausea, vomiting, vision changes and swelling of the optic disc. The label advises avoiding tetracyclines and vitamin A supplements, since isotretinoin is closely related to vitamin A [3]. It found no clinically significant change in a norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol pill's levels [3].
- Population
- Case reports and labeling statements [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- No rate is given.
Memory problems and tremor
One trial found poorer memory and tremor were each reported by 36 people on kava against 23 on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the 16-week trial, poorer memory and tremor or shakiness were each reported by 36 participants on kava and 23 on placebo [4]. In the 6-week trial, headaches were more frequent on kava [3].
- Population
- 171 [4] and 58 [3] adults with generalized anxiety disorder.
- Sources
- [4], [3]
- Caveats
- Counts come from two trials.
Abuse, misuse and dependence
The label warns of abuse and misuse. In recreational users, drug liking for esketamine matched intravenous ketamine and exceeded placebo. Dependence is reported with prolonged ketamine use.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Ketamine and esketamine are Schedule III. In 34 recreational polydrug users, "drug liking" and "take drug again" scores for esketamine 84 and 112 mg matched intravenous ketamine 0.5 mg/kg and exceeded placebo. Physical dependence has been reported with prolonged ketamine use. No withdrawal symptoms were captured up to 4 weeks after esketamine stopped [4].
- Population
- 34 recreational drug users in an abuse study, and trial participants [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate of misuse in treated patients.
Suicidal thoughts in young people
FDA states antidepressants raised suicidal thoughts and behaviors in people under 25 in pooled trials, 14 more per 1,000 under 18. Esketamine is not approved for children.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The esketamine label carries the antidepressant class warning: in pooled trials of other antidepressants, suicidal thoughts or behaviors rose by 14 per 1,000 under age 18 and 5 per 1,000 at 18 to 24, and fell at 25 and older [4].
- Population
- About 77,000 adults and 4,500 children in trials of other antidepressants [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The data are from other antidepressant classes, not from esketamine itself.
Thinking, memory and driving
The label reports slower thinking 40 minutes after an esketamine dose, back to placebo levels by 2 hours, and stable cognition over 1 to 3 years in open-label studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In healthy volunteers, a single dose impaired cognitive performance at 40 minutes but matched placebo at 2 hours. In 1-year and 3-year open-label studies, cognition stayed stable. Driving at 6 and 18 hours after 84 mg matched placebo, but two people stopped a driving test at 8 hours due to side effects. Long-term memory impairment is reported with repeated ketamine misuse [4].
- Population
- Healthy volunteers and open-label study participants [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Long-term data are uncontrolled.
Use with sedatives, opioids, stimulants and MAOIs
The label warns that benzodiazepines, opioids and alcohol may add to sedation, and that stimulants and MAOIs may raise blood pressure further.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states CNS depressants such as benzodiazepines, opioids and alcohol may increase sedation, and that psychostimulants such as amphetamines, methylphenidate, modafinil and armodafinil, and MAO inhibitors, may increase blood pressure [4].
- Population
- Labeling statement [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Predicted from how the drugs act. No rate is given.
Trouble sleeping
One small trial found 10% of trained men reported trouble sleeping after a 3 g dose, with no placebo rate given.
The numbers and sources
Aseptic meningitis
The label states lamotrigine raises the risk of aseptic meningitis, with symptoms starting 1 day to 6 weeks after it was begun and returning quickly on restarting.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Postmarketing cases presented with headache, fever, nausea, vomiting and neck stiffness. Most resolved after stopping. Re-exposure brought symptoms back within 30 minutes to 1 day, often more severe. Some affected people had lupus or other autoimmune diseases [4].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports in children and adults [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Reports, with no denominator.
Seizures after stopping abruptly
The label reports seizures in 2 people with bipolar disorder shortly after stopping lamotrigine abruptly. Other adverse reactions did not rise after abrupt stopping in the bipolar trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the bipolar development program, 2 patients had seizures soon after abrupt withdrawal. In the two controlled bipolar trials, abrupt stopping did not raise the incidence, severity or type of adverse reactions. In epilepsy, the label states seizure frequency may rise [4].
- Population
- Adults with bipolar disorder in clinical trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Two cases, with no denominator given for the whole program.
Interaction with estrogen-containing birth control
The label states estrogen-containing birth control pills lowered lamotrigine levels by about 50%, and levels can double during the pill-free week.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A pill containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 150 mcg levonorgestrel lowered lamotrigine concentrations by about 50%, and lamotrigine lowered levonorgestrel by 19%. During the pill-free week, lamotrigine levels are expected to rise, up to double by the end of the week, with possible dizziness, unsteadiness and double vision. Other estrogen products, including menopausal hormone therapy, were not studied [4].
- Population
- Drug interaction studies described in the label [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Measured as blood levels, with no rate of harm given.
Drugs that lower lamotrigine levels
The label states carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone and the antibiotic rifampin lower lamotrigine levels by about 40%, and some HIV protease inhibitors by 32% to 50%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone each lowered lamotrigine concentration by about 40%, rifampin lowered exposure by about 40%, lopinavir with ritonavir by about 50% and atazanavir with ritonavir by about 32%. The label also states lamotrigine can raise levels of drugs cleared by the kidney transporter OCT2, such as dofetilide [4].
- Population
- Drug interaction studies described in the label [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Changes in blood levels, with no rate of harm given.
Acute overdose
Case reports: overdoses brought fast heart rate, confusion or fever, with one death. In larger studies over 90% had minimal or no symptoms.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 95 published overdose cases, the median dose taken was 4,250 µg. Tachycardia occurred in 38.9%, confusion in 23.2%, fever in 18.9% and atrial fibrillation in 5.3%, and one death was reported. In larger retrospective studies, more than 90% had minimal or no symptoms, particularly children. Coma and heart failure occurred rarely, in adults after high doses [16].
- Population
- 95 case reports and 6 retrospective studies with 11,513 patients [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- Case reports cannot give a rate, and severe cases are more likely to be published.
Screen light before bed and sleep
One laboratory study found reading on a light-emitting e-reader before bed delayed sleep and the body clock and lowered next-morning alertness, against a printed book.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against reading a printed book, reading a light-emitting e-book in the hours before bed led to taking longer to fall asleep, less evening sleepiness, less melatonin, later circadian timing and lower alertness the next morning [12].
- Population
- Adults reading in a controlled laboratory setting. The abstract does not give the head count [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- One small laboratory study with several hours of reading at a set brightness. Screen use at home varies in time, brightness and content, and the screen-time page covers its other effects.
Side effects of blue-light filtering glasses
Limited evidence: trials reported infrequent side effects of blue-light filtering glasses, including headache, discomfort, lower mood and more depressive symptoms.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Nine trials reported on device-related adverse events and three described any. Events with blue-light filtering lenses were infrequent and included increased depressive symptoms, headache, discomfort wearing the glasses and lower mood. Clear lenses brought occasional discomfort and raised mood [4].
- Population
- 333 participants in 9 randomized trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Adverse events were not consistently reported, and the certainty was low [4].
Drug interactions
The labels warn of more hearing damage with aminoglycoside antibiotics, lithium toxicity, weaker effect with indomethacin, and low blood pressure and kidney decline with ACE inhibitors or ARBs.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Furosemide may raise the ear toxicity of aminoglycoside antibiotics, and the combination is to be avoided except in life-threatening situations. Diuretics reduce lithium clearance, with a high risk of lithium toxicity. Indomethacin may reduce furosemide's effect on sodium and blood pressure, and aspirin temporarily reduced kidney clearance in one small study. With ACE inhibitors or ARBs, furosemide may lead to severe low blood pressure and worse kidney function. Sucralfate may reduce its effect [10]. The torsemide label reports ear toxicity with gentamicin [1].
- Population
- Label statements and case reports [10][1].
- Sources
- [10], [1]
- Caveats
- Label warnings, mostly without measured rates.
Opioid withdrawal and opioid sensitivity
The 50 mg label warns people on opioids may have severe withdrawal, and after stopping may respond to lower opioid doses, with fatal overdoses reported.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The naltrexone label lists people receiving opioid pain medicines or dependent on opioids as contraindicated. It states withdrawal brought on by an opioid blocker can be severe enough to need hospitalization, with symptoms within 5 minutes lasting up to 48 hours. It also states that after stopping, people may respond to lower opioid doses than before, and fatal overdoses have been reported [14].
- Population
- Label for 50 mg tablets in alcohol and opioid dependence [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- The label describes 50 mg use. The LDN trials above did not report on opioid interactions.
Ischemic stroke and heart disease in subgroups
One large trial found more ischemic stroke in healthy women with normal blood pressure, and more coronary heart disease in women who had heart disease at entry.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In women without prior cardiovascular disease and with normal blood pressure, coronary heart disease fell (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.87), partly offset by a rise in ischemic stroke. In the 3.4% with cardiovascular disease at entry, coronary heart disease was higher, HR 1.47 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.93) during the intervention and 1.61 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.55) after it [10].
- Population
- 48,835 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Subgroup analyses. The abstract gives no figure for the stroke rise. The authors cite evidence that results in women with heart disease or high blood pressure at entry are confounded by cholesterol-lowering drug use after randomization [10].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 48,835 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Drug interactions
Case reports: in a review of adverse event reports, one linked maca taken with the antidepressant mianserin to restless legs syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A retrospective review of 1,816 adverse event reports found 30 with a likely causal link to an adaptogen taken with an antidepressant. One involved maca with mianserin, followed by restless legs syndrome [12].
- Population
- Adverse event reports from people taking antidepressants [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- A single report with no denominator, so it cannot give a rate. The abstract does not describe the case further [12]. No interaction study of maca with any drug was located.
Serious injuries in case reports
Case reports: 138 adverse events in 40 reports from 2003 to 2013, including disc herniation, nerve injury and vertebral artery dissection, often linked to spinal manipulation within massage.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- From 2003 to 2013, 40 reports described 138 adverse events with massage, mainly disc herniation, soft tissue trauma, neurologic compromise, spinal cord injury and vertebral artery dissection. Spinal manipulation within massage was repeatedly tied to the serious events [19]. An earlier review of 16 case reports and 4 case series found most harms followed exotic techniques or massage by laypeople, rarely massage therapists. Reported events included stroke, nerve damage, pulmonary embolism and hematoma [20].
- Population
- 138 cases [19]. 16 case reports and 4 case series [20].
- Sources
- [19], [20]
- Caveats
- Case reports give no rate. Both reviews judged serious events rare [19][20].
Psychosis and mania
Case reports: 28 published cases of psychosis or mania arising around meditation practice, half with other precipitating factors.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A review of 19 reports with 28 cases aged 18 to 57 found acute psychosis in 14, schizophrenia in 7, mania with psychotic symptoms in 3 and schizoaffective disorder in 1. Practices included Transcendental Meditation, mindfulness, qigong, Zen and others. Fourteen patients had precipitating factors such as insomnia, not eating, past mental illness, stress or substance use [26].
- Population
- 28 published cases [26].
- Sources
- [26]
- Caveats
- Case reports have no denominator, and the authors write that a causal link is difficult to attribute [26].
Epilepsy and warfarin
Case reports: people with epilepsy and people taking warfarin may have come to harm from melatonin.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Case reports reviewed in the Cochrane jet lag review suggest people with epilepsy and patients taking warfarin may come to harm from melatonin [7].
- Population
- Case reports [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The review called for investigation of both and gave no rates [7].
Headache
One trial found worsening headache on estrogen plus progestin in women with and without a migraine history, but not on estrogen alone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the WHI trials, estrogen plus progestin was associated with worsening headache over 1 year in women with a migraine history (aRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.03) and without one (aRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.30). Estrogen alone was not associated with worsening headache in women with a migraine history (aRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.34) [20].
- Population
- 22,876 women, average age 64, in the two WHI trials [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- A secondary analysis of self-reported headache, using oral conjugated estrogens [20].
Vestibular schwannoma
Limited evidence: two of four observational studies linked hormone therapy to a higher risk of vestibular schwannoma, a benign nerve tumor, without a definitive association.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Of 4 studies, two reported a higher relative risk of vestibular schwannoma, a benign nerve tumor, in people who had ever used hormone therapy. One found incidence 2.2 times the expected rate, and one found 10% higher odds [22].
- Population
- 4 observational studies [22].
- Sources
- [22]
- Caveats
- The authors describe a lack of a definitive association [22].
Serotonin syndrome with SSRIs and other serotonergic drugs (boxed warning)
The label warns methylene blue may cause serious or fatal serotonin syndrome with SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs and opioids. Case reports involve infusions.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The ProvayBlue label's boxed warning states methylene blue may cause serious or fatal serotonin syndrome with serotonergic drugs and opioids, naming SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs and opioids [6]. A systematic review of case reports and audits found 26 patients with an acute confusional state after methylene blue infusion. 24 were taking a serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 1 clomipramine, and serotonin syndrome was a possible diagnosis in all 25 [7].
- Population
- 9 case reports and 2 retrospective reviews, in people given intravenous infusions [7]; label [6].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Case reports cannot give a rate. The reports involve intravenous infusions, not oral doses.
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that mirtazapine can precipitate serotonin syndrome, with higher risk alongside other serotonergic drugs. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label names triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, SSRIs, SNRIs, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone, amphetamines and St. John's wort as raising the risk [7].
- Population
- Labeling statement [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- A label warning with no denominator.
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication because the combination increases the risk of serotonin syndrome. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that mirtazapine is contraindicated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors or within 14 days of stopping one. Its examples are selegiline, tranylcypromine, isocarboxazid, phenelzine, the antibiotic linezolid and intravenous methylene blue [7].
- Population
- Labeling statement [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Alcohol and benzodiazepines
The label states that benzodiazepines or alcohol taken with mirtazapine increase the impairment of thinking and motor skills beyond mirtazapine alone. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label lists diazepam, alprazolam and alcohol as examples that add to the impairment of cognitive and motor skills produced by mirtazapine [7].
- Population
- Labeling statement drawn from interaction studies [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- No numbers are given for the size of the added impairment.
Symptoms after stopping
The label reports dizziness, abnormal dreams, electric shock sensations, agitation, anxiety, nausea and sweating after stopping mirtazapine, particularly abruptly. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label lists dizziness, abnormal dreams, sensory disturbances including paresthesia and electric shock sensations, agitation, anxiety, fatigue, confusion, headache, tremor, nausea, vomiting and sweating after discontinuation [7]. Across antidepressants as a group, a meta-analysis found at least one discontinuation symptom in 31% of people stopping a drug and 17% stopping placebo, and severe symptoms in 2.8% against 0.6% [15].
- Population
- Reports summarized in labeling [7]; 21,002 patients in 79 studies of antidepressants [15].
- Sources
- [7], [15]
- Caveats
- The abstract of [15] names no figure for mirtazapine, so the pooled rate is context and not a mirtazapine rate. No study of misuse or dependence on mirtazapine was sourced.
Psychiatric symptoms
Case reports: the label describes mania, delusions, hallucinations, suicidal thoughts and aggression after approval, many in people with prior psychiatric history.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Postmarketing reports include mania, delusions, hallucinations, suicidal ideation and aggression, some leading to hospitalization. A healthy male volunteer developed paranoid delusions and hallucinations on 600 mg a day, three times the usual dose, with sleep deprivation, which cleared 36 hours after stopping [3]. In the bipolar depression trials, mood switching did not differ from placebo (RR 0.99) [16].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports [3]; 1,587 patients in 5 bipolar trials [16].
- Sources
- [3], [16]
- Caveats
- Reports have no denominator and cannot prove cause.
Abuse and dependence
The label states modafinil produces euphoric effects like other stimulants in experienced drug users, and found no withdrawal symptoms over 14 days after 9 weeks of use.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Both drugs are Schedule IV. In an inpatient study of people experienced with drugs of abuse, modafinil 200 to 800 mg produced psychoactive and euphoric effects consistent with methylphenidate. Monkeys trained on cocaine self-administered it. After 9 weeks of use in one placebo-controlled trial, no withdrawal symptoms were reported over 14 days, though sleepiness returned in people with narcolepsy [3].
- Population
- People with a history of drug use in an inpatient study, and patients in one 9-week trial [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate of misuse in the general population.
FDA boxed warning: serious neuropsychiatric events
FDA states serious neuropsychiatric events, including agitation, aggression, depression, sleep disturbances and suicidal thoughts and behavior, have been reported with montelukast. The label gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warning lists agitation, aggression, depression, sleep disturbances, and suicidal thoughts and behavior including suicide, and states the mechanism is not well understood. The label lists further reported events including hallucinations, memory impairment, stuttering, sleepwalking and tics, in people with and without a psychiatric history, some after stopping [1]. FDA required the boxed warning in March 2020 after reviewing case reports, including 82 reported completed suicides, most of which (48 of 82) lacked enough information to judge whether montelukast was involved, and an observational study in its Sentinel system that did not find an increased risk compared with inhaled corticosteroids [8].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports in children, adolescents and adults [1][8].
- Sources
- [1], [8]
- Caveats
- Spontaneous reports cannot give a rate or prove cause. FDA's own observational study did not find a higher risk [8].
Single-nutrient harms
Limited evidence: single supplements were linked to hip fracture with vitamin A, hemorrhagic stroke with vitamin E, and kidney stones with vitamin C and calcium.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The Task Force review found limited evidence linking some single supplements to serious harms: hip fracture with vitamin A, hemorrhagic stroke with vitamin E, and kidney stones with vitamin C and calcium [4].
- Population
- Healthy adults in RCTs and cohorts [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- These are single-nutrient findings, not tests of multivitamins.
Tizanidine with ciprofloxacin, fluvoxamine and oral contraceptives
One small study found ciprofloxacin raised tizanidine blood levels 10-fold and deepened its fall in blood pressure. The label contraindicates the combination.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In healthy volunteers, ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day raised tizanidine exposure 10-fold (range 6 to 24) and its peak level 7-fold. Systolic pressure fell 35 mm Hg against 15 mm Hg on placebo and diastolic 24 against 11, with more drowsiness [16]. The label lists strong CYP1A2 inhibitors, naming fluvoxamine and ciprofloxacin, as contraindicated, and says use with oral contraceptives and other weaker inhibitors such as cimetidine, famotidine, acyclovir and some heart rhythm drugs is to be avoided [12].
- Population
- 10 healthy volunteers in a crossover study, each given one 4 mg dose of tizanidine [16].
- Sources
- [16], [12]
- Caveats
- A drug-level study in 10 people, with one dose of tizanidine.
Stopping suddenly
The labels warn that stopping baclofen abruptly has caused hallucinations and seizures, and stopping tizanidine can cause rebound high blood pressure and a fast heart rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The baclofen label states that hallucinations and seizures have occurred on abrupt withdrawal [14]. The tizanidine label states that withdrawal reactions include rebound hypertension, tachycardia and increased muscle tone, particularly after 20 to 28 mg a day for 9 weeks or more or with concurrent narcotics [12].
- Population
- People stopping baclofen or tizanidine, as described in the labels [14][12].
- Sources
- [14], [12]
- Caveats
- The labels give no rate.
Cyclobenzaprine: serotonin syndrome
The label warns that serotonin syndrome has been reported when cyclobenzaprine is combined with antidepressants, tramadol or MAO inhibitors, and contraindicates MAO inhibitors.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The cyclobenzaprine label states that potentially life-threatening serotonin syndrome has been reported with SSRIs, SNRIs, tricyclic antidepressants, tramadol, bupropion, meperidine, verapamil or MAO inhibitors. Use with an MAO inhibitor or within 14 days of one is contraindicated, and the label reports hyperpyretic crisis, seizures and deaths with that combination [10].
- Population
- People taking cyclobenzaprine with these drugs, as described in the label [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Postmarketing reports with no rate.
With opioids
Linked to slightly more opioid overdose when a muscle relaxant was taken with an opioid, more so with baclofen and beyond 60 days of use.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against opioid use alone, concurrent use of a skeletal muscle relaxant was associated with opioid overdose (combined HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.48). The hazard ratio was 0.91 for 14 days or less and 1.80 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.48) beyond 60 days. It was 1.83 for baclofen (95% CI 1.11 to 3.04), 1.84 for carisoprodol, and 1.39 when a benzodiazepine was also used [18].
- Population
- Incident and prevalent opioid user cohorts in a population-based study [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- Observational, and the main estimate's interval reaches 1.00.
With alcohol and other sedating drugs
The labels warn that cyclobenzaprine and methocarbamol may add to the effects of alcohol and other central nervous system depressants.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The cyclobenzaprine label states that the drug, especially with alcohol or other central nervous system depressants, may impair the mental and physical abilities needed for driving or operating machinery [10]. The methocarbamol label states that the drug may have a general depressant effect on the central nervous system and cautions about combined effects with alcohol and other depressants [15].
- Population
- People taking these drugs, as described in the labels [10][15].
- Sources
- [10], [15]
- Caveats
- The labels cite no study and give no rate.
Injuries in older adults
Linked to more injuries in older adults, with 32% higher odds among recent users of a muscle relaxant in one case-control study.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among older adults, 1.30% of those with an injury and 0.77% of matched controls had used a muscle relaxant in the prior 60 days (adjusted OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.50). The odds ratio was 1.42 for methocarbamol (95% CI 1.16 to 1.75) and 1.22 for cyclobenzaprine (95% CI 1.02 to 1.45) [19].
- Population
- 27,974 older adults with an injury and 104,303 matched controls, from a base population of 322,806 [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- Observational. The shares are of people with an injury who had used the drug, not of users who were injured.
Suicidal thoughts and mood (boxed warning)
The label carries a boxed warning on suicidal thinking from the antidepressant class. In weight trials, depression and suicidality did not rise over placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label carries a boxed warning on suicidal thinking and behavior, based on antidepressant use in children, adolescents and young adults [8]. In COR-I, the combination was not associated with more depression or suicidality events than placebo [1]. In type 2 diabetes, depression and suicidal ideation did not differ between groups [5]. In the cardiovascular trial, central nervous system symptoms occurred in 5.1% against 1.2% [6].
- Population
- Label class warning for bupropion [8]; trial participants in [1], [5] and [6].
- Sources
- [8], [1], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- The boxed warning comes from the antidepressant class, not from a signal in the weight trials.
Grogginess after waking from a nap
Limited evidence: grogginess and poorer performance just after waking, called sleep inertia, were reported after naps, including some naps of 30 minutes or less.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Studies of naps of 30 minutes or less gave mixed results on whether deep sleep and sleep inertia occurred, depending on prior sleep and time of day [19]. During the sleep inertia period after daytime naps, results were conflicting [2]. After night-shift naps, memory got worse immediately after waking [4]. In athlete trials, benefits were larger when testing came more than an hour after waking [3].
- Population
- Nap studies reviewed in [19]. 381 adults [2]. 494 participants on night shifts [4]. 291 young males [3].
- Sources
- [19], [2], [4], [3]
- Caveats
- The review pooled no data and gave no rate [19]. Sleep inertia usually lasts minutes, and few studies measured how long.
Worse outcomes in Parkinson disease
One trial found motor and non-motor symptoms worsened more on NR than placebo in early Parkinson disease.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Motor and non-motor symptom scores worsened more on NR than on placebo over 52 weeks [8]. In mild cognitive impairment, NR was linked to lower SPPB scores and slower chair-stand times [5].
- Population
- 393 people with early Parkinson disease in the primary analysis [8]; adults with mild cognitive impairment in pooled trials [5].
- Sources
- [8], [5]
- Caveats
- One trial in Parkinson disease. The findings may not apply to people without these conditions.
Aspartame and phenylketonuria
FDA states people with phenylketonuria, a rare genetic disorder, need to avoid or restrict aspartame, and labels must state that a product contains phenylalanine.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The FDA states that people who have difficulty metabolizing phenylalanine because of phenylketonuria need to avoid or restrict aspartame, that newborns are routinely tested for it, and that labels of products with aspartame must carry a statement for people with phenylketonuria [3].
- Population
- People with phenylketonuria [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- A regulator statement about one inherited condition. It does not apply to other sweeteners.
Serotonin syndrome
The label reports serotonin syndrome with ondansetron, mostly with other serotonergic drugs such as SSRIs and SNRIs, some cases fatal. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Serotonin syndrome has been reported with 5-HT3 antagonists alone, and most reports involved SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, mirtazapine, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol or intravenous methylene blue. Some cases were fatal, and most occurred in a recovery room or infusion center. Cases have also followed ondansetron overdose alone [3].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Reports, with no denominator.
Apomorphine and other interactions
The label lists apomorphine as a contraindication because of profound low blood pressure and loss of consciousness, and notes tramadol may work less well alongside ondansetron.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Use with apomorphine is contraindicated because of the risk of profound hypotension and loss of consciousness. Phenytoin, carbamazepine and rifampin raised ondansetron clearance and lowered its blood levels, with no dose change advised. In two small trials, people given ondansetron used more patient-controlled tramadol [3].
- Population
- Labeling statements and small trials [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- No rates are given.
Hunger
One small crossover trial found hunger rose on one daily meal, and ghrelin, a hunger hormone, rose in the same trial.
The numbers and sources
Boxed warning: addiction, overdose and breathing depression
FDA states these drugs expose users to addiction, abuse and misuse that can lead to overdose and death, and can cause fatal breathing depression.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warning on oxycodone tablets states that the drug exposes patients and other users to the risks of opioid addiction, abuse and misuse, which can lead to overdose and death. It states that serious, life-threatening or fatal respiratory depression may occur, especially when starting or after a dose increase, and that accidental ingestion of even one dose, especially by children, can result in a fatal overdose. It also covers use with benzodiazepines or other central nervous system depressants, neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome and interactions with CYP3A4 inhibitors [20]. The hydrocodone and acetaminophen label carries the same warnings and adds liver toxicity from acetaminophen [19]. The tramadol label adds that life-threatening respiratory depression and death have occurred in children given tramadol, and lists children under 12 as a contraindication [16].
- Population
- People taking oxycodone, hydrocodone or tramadol, as described in the labels [20][19][16].
- Sources
- [20], [19], [16]
- Caveats
- A boxed warning states a risk and gives no rate. Rates from studies are in the blocks below.
Tramadol: seizures and serotonin syndrome
The label warns that tramadol has caused seizures and serotonin syndrome within its usual dose range, more so with antidepressants and other serotonergic drugs.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The tramadol label states that seizures have been reported within the usual dosage range and that the risk rises above it. It lists SSRI and tricyclic antidepressants, cyclobenzaprine, other opioids, MAO inhibitors and neuroleptics as raising seizure risk. It states that cases of serotonin syndrome have been reported, particularly with SSRIs, SNRIs, tricyclic antidepressants, triptans, cyclobenzaprine and MAO inhibitors, and that tramadol is not to be used with an MAO inhibitor or within 14 days of one [16].
- Population
- People taking tramadol, as described in the label [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate for either.
With drugs that change how the liver clears opioids
The label warns that CYP3A4 inhibitors, including some antibiotics and antifungals, can raise oxycodone and hydrocodone levels and cause fatal breathing depression.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warnings state that CYP3A4 inhibitors may raise oxycodone or hydrocodone concentrations and cause potentially fatal respiratory depression, and that stopping a CYP3A4 inducer may do the same. The oxycodone label names macrolide antibiotics such as erythromycin, azole antifungals such as ketoconazole and protease inhibitors such as ritonavir as inhibitors, and rifampin, carbamazepine and phenytoin as inducers [20][19]. The tramadol label also names the CYP2D6 inhibitors quinidine, fluoxetine, paroxetine and bupropion as changing tramadol and its active metabolite [16].
- Population
- People taking these drugs together, as described in the labels [20][19][16].
- Sources
- [20], [19], [16]
- Caveats
- The labels give no rate.
Headaches becoming more frequent
Linked to about twice the odds of episodic migraine becoming chronic within a year in people using opioid-containing medicines for headaches.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Of 8,219 people with episodic migraine, 2.5% had developed chronic migraine a year later. Against people using acetaminophen, those using medicines containing opiates had higher odds of that change (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.2). Triptan use was not associated with it (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.7) [33].
- Population
- 8,219 adults with episodic migraine in 2005, followed to 2006 [33].
- Sources
- [33]
- Caveats
- Observational. People with worsening headaches may be more likely to be given opioids.
Use in pregnancy: withdrawal in the newborn
FDA states that extended use in pregnancy can cause neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, which may be life-threatening if not recognized and treated.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warning states that use of opioids for an extended period during pregnancy can result in neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, which may be life-threatening if not recognized and treated and needs management by neonatology experts [20][16].
- Population
- Pregnant women using opioids for an extended period, and their newborns, as described in the labels [20][16].
- Sources
- [20], [16]
- Caveats
- The labels give no rate.
Mood changes, mania, delirium and suicide attempts
Linked to suicide attempts, mania, delirium and depression, with hazard ratios of 6.89, 4.35, 5.14 and 1.83 against untreated people with the same illness.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against people with the same underlying disease not given glucocorticoids, the hazard ratio was 6.89 for suicide or suicide attempt (95% CI 4.52 to 10.50), 4.35 for mania (3.67 to 5.16), 5.14 for delirium, confusion or disorientation (4.54 to 5.82), 1.83 for depression (1.72 to 1.94) and 1.45 for panic disorder. Risk was higher at higher doses and in people with a previous neuropsychiatric history. Across 786,868 courses there were 109 suicides or attempts and 10,220 severe neuropsychiatric cases [28].
- Population
- 372,696 patients given oral glucocorticoids in primary care [28].
- Sources
- [28]
- Caveats
- Observational. The label lists psychiatric reactions among adverse effects and gives no rate [20].
Gas embolism and stroke
Case reports: gas bubbles reached the brain during oxygen-ozone injection into a lumbar disc, causing multiple strokes.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A 58-year-old woman developed limb weakness and speech disturbance during an intradiscal oxygen-ozone injection for disc herniation. Brain scans showed multiple gas emboli and strokes in both hemispheres, and echocardiography found a patent foramen ovale. She had improved significantly a year later. The authors note that oxygen-ozone therapy has been linked to gas embolism [13].
- Population
- One woman [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Case reports give no rate.
Sudden vision or hearing loss
The label warns of sudden vision loss from NAION and sudden hearing loss. Case reports describe 54 people with hearing loss, and of 7 followed, 4 did not improve.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The Cialis label warns that sudden loss of vision in one or both eyes could be non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), and notes higher risk with a prior NAION or a crowded optic disc. It also warns of sudden decrease or loss of hearing [7]. A systematic review of published cases found 54 people with moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss while using PDE5 inhibitors, most often sildenafil, vardenafil or tadalafil. Of 7 with follow-up after stopping, 4 did not improve, 2 recovered fully and 1 partly [9].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports summarized in the label [7]; 54 patients aged 37 to 62 in 6 studies [9].
- Sources
- [7], [9]
- Caveats
- Postmarketing reports and case series cannot give a rate or establish cause. [9] had no control group.
Depression in cat owners
Linked to slightly higher odds of depression in cat owners, 6%, in a subgroup analysis of one meta-analysis that found no link for pets overall.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Cat ownership was linked to depression (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09), while pets overall (OR 1.03) and dogs (OR 0.93) were not [10].
- Population
- 159,322 participants in 21 observational studies [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- A sensitivity analysis within one review, with a small effect. Observational, and the direction of the link is unknown.
Abuse potential, tolerance, and heart and lung warnings
The label classifies phentermine as a Schedule IV controlled substance and states tolerance to the appetite effect usually develops within a few weeks.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The phentermine label classifies it as a Schedule IV controlled substance related to the amphetamines. It states that tolerance to the appetite effect usually develops within a few weeks. It lists rare reported cases of primary pulmonary hypertension and of serious regurgitant heart valve disease. The valve cases were reported with phentermine combined with fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine, and the label states the role of phentermine itself has not been established [10].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports and pharmacology summarized in the label [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- These are label statements and case reports, not trial rates.
Meningioma
The injection label warns of meningioma, mainly with long-term use. A French case-control study in women linked prolonged injectable medroxyprogesterone to 5.55 times the odds of meningioma surgery.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states meningiomas have been reported after repeated doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate, mainly with long-term use [1]. Among 18,061 women who had surgery for intracranial meningioma and 90,305 matched controls, injectable medroxyprogesterone was used by 9 cases (0.05%) and 11 controls (0.01%), odds ratio 5.55 (95% CI 2.27 to 13.56), driven by use of one year or more. No excess was found for progesterone, dydrogesterone or levonorgestrel IUDs, and too few women used dienogest to draw conclusions [18].
- Population
- 108,366 women in the French national health database, 2009 to 2018 [18].
- Sources
- [1], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational, with few exposed cases, and only meningiomas treated by surgery were counted [18].
Adverse effects at high doses
One trial at up to 1,000 mg twice daily found nausea, diarrhea and weight loss, and more brain volume loss than placebo in Alzheimer disease.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- At up to 1,000 mg twice daily for 52 weeks, the most common adverse events were nausea, diarrhea and weight loss. Brain volume loss was greater on resveratrol than placebo [13]. Most trials in a blood pressure meta-analysis reported no serious adverse events [3].
- Population
- 119 people with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease [13]; 17 RCTs [3].
- Sources
- [13], [3]
- Caveats
- The trial authors wrote that further studies are needed to interpret the biomarker changes [13]. One trial in a disease population.
Mania and hypomania
Limited evidence: 2 of 441 people given SAMe in depression trials had mania or hypomania.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Two cases of mania or hypomania were recorded among 441 participants given SAMe across the depression trials [1].
- Population
- Adults with major depression [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Most trials did not detail specific adverse effects. The review authors flagged induction of mania as of particular interest for future trials [1].
Serotonin syndrome-like symptoms with antidepressants
One trial found one case of serotonin syndrome-like symptoms with SAMe added to an antidepressant. Other side effects were no higher than on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the 8-week add-on trial, SAMe was implicated in one case of serotonin syndrome-like symptoms. Adverse effects otherwise did not exceed placebo [4].
- Population
- 107 adults taking antidepressants [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- A single case in one trial.
FDA warnings
FDA states life-threatening reactions, including liver injury needing hospitalization, have occurred with SARM products, and lists potential heart attack, stroke, psychosis and infertility.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- FDA states that life-threatening reactions, including liver injuries that required hospitalization, have occurred in people taking products containing SARMs. It lists potential heart attack or stroke, psychosis or hallucinations, sleep disturbance, sexual dysfunction, liver failure, infertility, miscarriage and testicular shrinkage. FDA testing of one product labeled as containing YK-11 found an undeclared anabolic steroid, after an adverse event report of a stroke [10]. Warning letters in 2023 and December 2025 told sellers that SARM products were unapproved new drugs, despite labels saying they were for research only [11][12].
- Population
- US consumers and sellers [10][11][12].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Regulator statements of potential harm, without rates.
Reported side effects and serious case reports
Case reports: death and brain bleeding appeared in isolated reports with questionable causality. Stomach upset, headache and lower libido were the most often reported effects.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A systematic review of 40 articles, plus WHO and national reporting schemes, found the most frequent adverse events were abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, headache, decreased libido and rhinitis. Death and cerebral hemorrhage appeared in isolated case reports and spontaneous reports, with causality questionable. No drug interactions were reported [9]. In the Permixon review, gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequent reaction, at 3.8% [4].
- Population
- 26 RCTs, other trials and case reports [9].
- Sources
- [9], [4]
- Caveats
- Spontaneous reports cannot give a rate. The authors note adverse event reporting was poor [9].
Later sleep and body clock after a light-emitting screen before bed
One laboratory trial found reading on a light-emitting e-reader before bed delayed sleep and the body clock, lowered melatonin and reduced next-morning alertness, against a printed book.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Reading on the e-reader, people took longer to fall asleep, felt less sleepy in the evening, secreted less melatonin, had a later circadian clock, less and later REM sleep, and lower alertness the next morning than when reading a printed book [11].
- Population
- Healthy adults in a sleep laboratory, each reading in both formats in the hours before bed [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- A small laboratory study. The abstract gives no sizes, and everyday device use at home may expose people to less light than the study used.
Blackout and drowning after hyperventilating before breath-holding in water
Case series: New York State recorded 16 fatal and nonfatal drownings in otherwise healthy swimmers that followed intentional hyperventilation, hypoxic training or prolonged breath-holding.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A state health department review of 1988 to 2011 identified 16 drownings that followed dangerous underwater breath-holding behaviors in swimmers with no known medical condition or substance use. Practicing more than one of these behaviors was linked to a higher risk of death. The review was prompted by two healthy young men who became unconscious underwater and died after intentional hyperventilation before submersion [20].
- Population
- 16 swimmers in New York State, 15 of them at pools [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- A case series with no denominator. These were swimmers breath-holding underwater, not people doing breathwork on land.
Dizziness on standing, fainting and falls
The duloxetine label reports falls, fainting and blood pressure drops on standing, with more falls than placebo across its trials. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that orthostatic hypotension, falls and syncope have been reported at the labeled doses, mostly in the first week or after a dose increase, and that people on duloxetine reported a higher rate of falls than people on placebo in an analysis of all placebo-controlled trials. It states the risk rose with age and that falls with fractures and hospital stays have been reported. It names blood pressure medicines and doses above 60 mg as raising the chance of a pressure drop [18].
- Population
- Adults in placebo-controlled duloxetine trials, as summarized in labeling [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- The label gives no fall rates for either group.
Alcohol
Mixed results: one study found duloxetine did not add to impairment from alcohol, while three trial patients with liver injury were heavy drinkers.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- When duloxetine and alcohol were given so that their peak levels coincided, duloxetine did not increase the impairment of mental and motor skills caused by alcohol. In the clinical trials database, three people on duloxetine had liver injury with raised ALT and bilirubin, each with substantial alcohol use. The label states duloxetine and alcohol may interact to cause liver injury [18].
- Population
- Volunteers in an interaction study and three cases from the duloxetine trials database [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- Three cases cannot show cause. The label does not give the size of the interaction study.
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that SNRIs can cause serotonin syndrome, more often with other serotonergic drugs. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The duloxetine label states that taking it with other serotonergic drugs increases the risk of serotonin syndrome. It names other SNRIs, SSRIs, triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, opioids, lithium, buspirone, amphetamines, tryptophan and St. John's Wort [18].
- Population
- Labeling statement [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- A label warning with no denominator.
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication, within 14 days before or 5 days after duloxetine, because of an increased risk of serotonin syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The duloxetine label lists as contraindications taking it with an MAOI antidepressant, taking it within 14 days of stopping one, and starting an MAOI within 5 days of stopping duloxetine. It also lists starting duloxetine in a person being treated with the antibiotic linezolid or intravenous methylene blue [18].
- Population
- Labeling statement [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Overdose
The venlafaxine label reports that overdose may carry a higher risk of death than SSRI overdose and a lower risk than tricyclic overdose.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label cites published retrospective studies in which venlafaxine overdose was associated with more fatal outcomes than SSRI overdose and fewer than tricyclic overdose. It adds that people prescribed venlafaxine had more suicide risk factors than people prescribed SSRIs, so it is unclear how much of the difference comes from the drug [10].
- Population
- Retrospective studies summarized in labeling [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The label gives no numbers and says the cause of the difference is not clear.
With lithium or digoxin
The label warns that spironolactone lowers the kidney's clearance of lithium, raising the risk of lithium toxicity, and interferes with some digoxin blood tests.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that spironolactone, like other diuretics, reduces the renal clearance of lithium and so increases the risk of lithium toxicity. It also states that spironolactone and its metabolites interfere with radioimmunoassays for digoxin and raise the apparent digoxin level, and that the effect on actual digoxin exposure is unknown [3].
- Population
- People taking spironolactone with lithium or digoxin, as described in the label [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that SSRIs can cause serotonin syndrome, alone or more often with other serotonergic drugs. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label describes serotonin syndrome as potentially life-threatening, with agitation, hallucinations, fast heart rate, unstable blood pressure, sweating, fever, tremor, rigidity, seizures, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. It states the risk is increased with triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, other SSRIs and SNRIs, fentanyl, tramadol, meperidine, methadone, lithium, tryptophan, buspirone, amphetamines and St. John's Wort, and that it can also occur on an SSRI alone [24].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports summarized in labeling [24].
- Sources
- [24]
- Caveats
- A label warning based on reports, with no denominator.
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication, within 14 days in either direction, because the combination raises the risk of serotonin syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that taking an SSRI with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor increases the risk of serotonin syndrome and lists the combination, or use within 14 days of stopping an MAOI, as a contraindication. Its examples are selegiline, tranylcypromine, isocarboxazid, phenelzine, the antibiotic linezolid and intravenous methylene blue [24].
- Population
- Labeling statement [24].
- Sources
- [24]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Serotonin syndrome with antidepressants
Case reports: five older patients combining prescription antidepressants with St. John's wort were diagnosed with serotonin syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Five elderly patients who combined prescription antidepressants with St. John's wort were diagnosed with central serotonergic syndrome [13]. The interaction review also identified possible interactions with SSRIs and triptans, with a higher risk of adverse reactions [11].
- Population
- Case series [13]. Regulator and published reports [11].
- Sources
- [13], [11]
- Caveats
- Case reports cannot give a rate.
Mania and psychosis
Case reports: a young man with no psychiatric history developed mania and psychosis after months at standard doses, improving within a week on medication after stopping.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A man in his early twenties with no notable psychiatric history developed acute mania and psychosis, with grandiose and persecutory delusions, after several months of St. John's wort at standard doses. Tests and brain imaging were normal. He improved within a week on aripiprazole, and St. John's wort was stopped [14]. The authors note that earlier reported cases typically involved high doses, psychotropic drugs or a psychiatric history [14].
- Population
- One case report [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- A single case. The link is described as possible, and the episode followed a COVID-19 infection [14].
With lithium
Mixed results: the label warns that diuretics reduce lithium clearance and raise toxicity risk, and one cohort did not find more toxicity admissions with thiazides.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The hydrochlorothiazide label states that diuretics reduce the kidney's clearance of lithium and add a high risk of lithium toxicity [14]. In a study of older adults on lithium, thiazide diuretics were not independently associated with a significant rise in hospital admission for lithium toxicity, while loop diuretics (RR 5.5) and ACE inhibitors (RR 7.6) were [25].
- Population
- 10,615 Ontario residents aged 66 and older on lithium [25].
- Sources
- [14], [25]
- Caveats
- One observational study, in older adults, counting only hospital admissions.
Long-term use
The label for prescription betaine warns it can raise blood methionine, with severe brain swelling reported in people with an inherited enzyme deficiency.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Betaine anhydrous is an FDA-approved prescription drug (Cystadane) for homocystinuria. Its label warns that it may worsen high plasma methionine in people with CBS deficiency, and that severe cerebral edema with high methionine was reported 2 weeks to 6 months after starting, with complete recovery after stopping. In a physician survey covering 111 treated patients, reported reactions included nausea and gastrointestinal distress in 2 each [10].
- Population
- People with homocystinuria taking prescription betaine, from postmarketing reports and a survey of 41 physicians [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Reports come from people with a rare inherited disorder, and postmarketing reports give no rate [10]. No long-term study in people without homocystinuria was located.
Seizures on stopping
The label warns that seizure drugs including topiramate are withdrawn gradually because stopping can bring on seizures, even in people without epilepsy. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that in people with or without a history of seizures, seizure drugs including topiramate are withdrawn gradually to reduce the chance of seizures or more frequent seizures [3].
- Population
- Labeling statement [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- No rate is given.
Other drug interactions
The label reports that phenytoin and carbamazepine lower topiramate levels, while topiramate can raise lithium and amitriptyline levels, and other carbonic anhydrase inhibitors add to acidosis and stones.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Phenytoin and carbamazepine significantly lowered topiramate concentrations. Hydrochlorothiazide raised topiramate exposure. Topiramate lowered pioglitazone exposure, raised lithium exposure at doses up to 600 mg a day, and produced large increases in amitriptyline concentration in some people. Zonisamide, acetazolamide and other carbonic anhydrase inhibitors may worsen metabolic acidosis and raise kidney stone risk [3].
- Population
- Drug interaction studies described in the label [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Changes in blood levels, with no rate of harm given.
Falls in older adults
Linked to falls in older adults in observational studies, at a rate similar to antipsychotics in people with dementia.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among Medicare beneficiaries with insomnia, those receiving an insomnia medicine had more falls than matched controls (OR 2.34, 95% CI 2.31 to 2.36), with the greatest risk on benzodiazepines or trazodone [17]. In older adults with dementia, trazodone had rates of falls or major fractures similar to atypical antipsychotics (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.07) and a lower rate of death (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.85) [18].
- Population
- 1,699,913 Medicare beneficiaries, mean age 75 [17]; 6,588 older adults with dementia dispensed trazodone and 2,875 dispensed an atypical antipsychotic, 95% at low doses [18].
- Sources
- [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational. The authors of [17] note that use of these medicines may mark underlying illness. [18] compared trazodone with another drug, not with no treatment. Neither abstract gives an absolute fall rate for trazodone.
Serotonin syndrome
The label warns that trazodone can cause serotonin syndrome, more often with other serotonergic drugs. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that taking trazodone with other serotonergic drugs increases the risk of serotonin syndrome. Its examples are triptans, tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fentanyl, tramadol, lithium, tryptophan, buspirone and St. John's Wort [12].
- Population
- Labeling statement [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- A label warning with no denominator.
Use with MAOIs
The label lists MAOIs as a contraindication because the combination increases the risk of serotonin syndrome.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that trazodone is contraindicated in people taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors, including the antibiotic linezolid and intravenous methylene blue. Its examples are isocarboxazid, moclobemide, phenelzine, selegiline and tranylcypromine [12].
- Population
- Labeling statement [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Alcohol and other sedating drugs
The label states trazodone may enhance the response to alcohol, barbiturates and other central nervous system depressants. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
Drinking after alcohol detox
One trial found people given trazodone for sleep after alcohol detox improved less in days abstinent and drank more per drinking day after stopping it.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Sleep quality improved on trazodone while it was taken and matched placebo once it was stopped. The trazodone group improved less in the proportion of days abstinent during treatment, and had an increase of 4.6 drinks per drinking day (95% CI 2.1 to 7.1) after the medication ended [20].
- Population
- 173 adults with sleep disturbance after alcohol detoxification, 88 on trazodone and 85 on placebo, followed 6 months [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- One trial in a specific group. It reports changes in drinking, not a rate of harm.
Symptoms after stopping
Case reports: three people developed withdrawal symptoms despite gradual tapering. Pooled reviews of antidepressants give no rate for trazodone alone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A report describes three people who developed withdrawal symptoms although therapeutic doses of trazodone were stopped gradually [21]. The label lists nausea, sweating, low mood, irritability, dizziness, electric shock sensations, anxiety, insomnia and tinnitus among reactions after stopping serotonergic antidepressants [12]. Across antidepressants as a group, a meta-analysis found at least one discontinuation symptom in 31% of people stopping a drug and 17% stopping placebo [22].
- Population
- Three case reports [21]; 21,002 patients in 79 studies of antidepressants [22].
- Sources
- [21], [12], [22]
- Caveats
- The abstract of [22] names no figure for trazodone, so the pooled rate is context and not a trazodone rate. No systematic review of trazodone discontinuation was located.
Mania or hypomania
The label warns that an antidepressant can trigger a manic episode in people with bipolar disorder. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that activation of mania or hypomania has been reported in a small proportion of people with major affective disorder treated with antidepressants [12].
- Population
- Labeling statement [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- No number is given.
Headaches from frequent use
The label warns that using triptans on 10 or more days a month may worsen headaches. One cohort found triptan use did not predict chronic migraine a year later.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that overuse of acute migraine drugs, naming ergotamine, triptans and opioids taken on 10 or more days a month, may lead to medication overuse headache, with daily migraine-like headaches or more frequent attacks [11]. Of 8,219 people with episodic migraine, 2.5% had chronic migraine a year later. Against acetaminophen users, triptan use at baseline was not associated with that change (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.7), and use of barbiturates (OR 2.06) or opiates (OR 1.98) was [17].
- Population
- 8,219 adults with episodic migraine in 2005, followed to 2006 [17].
- Sources
- [11], [17]
- Caveats
- Observational, and the cohort measured any use at baseline, not use on 10 or more days a month.
With MAO inhibitors, ergot drugs and other triptans
The label contraindicates sumatriptan with MAO-A inhibitors, which raise its blood levels 7-fold, and within 24 hours of an ergot drug or another triptan.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that MAO-A inhibitors increase exposure to sumatriptan 7-fold and contraindicates use with one or within 2 weeks of one. It contraindicates use within 24 hours of ergotamine-type drugs or another triptan because their effects on blood vessels may add together [11].
- Population
- People taking these drugs together, as described in the label [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Stroke
Linked to 20% more strokes in vegetarians than meat eaters in one UK cohort, mostly hemorrhagic. A meta-analysis found no link to stroke death.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In EPIC-Oxford, vegetarians had higher rates of total stroke than meat eaters (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.40), about 3 more per 1,000 people over 10 years, mostly from hemorrhagic stroke [11]. In 7 cohorts, vegetarian diets were not linked to stroke death (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10) [10].
- Population
- 48,188 UK adults followed 18.1 years [11]; adults in 7 cohorts [10]. Observational.
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational. The stroke link did not weaken after adjusting for disease risk factors [11]. The vegetarian group included vegans [11].
Sensory nerve damage (peripheral neuropathy)
Case reports: high-dose B6 was followed by sensory nerve damage, sometimes disabling, improving after stopping. EFSA calls the link well established.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Seven adults developed ataxia and severe sensory loss after daily high-dose pyridoxine. Four were severely disabled, and all improved after stopping [12]. A 2023 systematic review of 20 articles found high B6 levels linked to a mainly sensory, axonal neuropathy that people report improving after stopping [13]. EFSA calls the link between excess B6 and peripheral neuropathy well established and bases its upper limit on it. It drew its 50 mg a day reference point from a case-control study, supported by case reports and vigilance data [11].
- Population
- Case series of 7 adults [12]; 20 articles [13]; EFSA systematic reviews [11].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Evidence is case reports, case-control and vigilance data, not trials. EFSA could not set a lowest dose that causes harm from human data. It notes an inverse relationship between dose and time to symptoms [11].
Lower wellbeing at very high volunteering hours
One study found an inverted U shape: people volunteering at high levels had lower wellbeing scores than those volunteering at moderate levels.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The link between hours spent volunteering and psychological wellbeing formed inverted U shapes. Non-volunteers and those volunteering at high levels scored lower than those volunteering at moderate levels, after controlling for work, partner status, physical health and education [15].
- Population
- 2,136 Australian adults aged 64 to 68 [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- One cross-sectional study. The abstract does not give the hours at which wellbeing fell.
Mental health effects in disaster volunteers
Limited evidence: a review found post-traumatic stress, depression and anxiety reported in volunteers after natural disasters, more often in community and spontaneous volunteers.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Post-traumatic stress symptoms were the outcome most studied, followed by depression, anxiety and stress. Distress occurred in every volunteer group. Trauma exposure and disaster-related losses were risk factors, and training and organizational support were protective [16].
- Population
- 4,083 adult volunteers in 17 studies, mostly cross-sectional [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- A narrative review with no rates and no comparison with non-volunteers [16]. It covers disaster work only.
Serious harms in case reports
Case reports: 76 published cases of harm linked to yoga, most often after headstand, shoulder stand, lotus position or forceful breathing. One person died.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Of 76 cases in 35 case reports and 2 case series, 35.5% affected the musculoskeletal system, 18.4% the nervous system and 11.8% the eyes. Ten had preconditions, mainly glaucoma and osteopenia. Fifteen recovered fully, 9 partially, 1 not at all, and 1 died [18].
- Population
- 76 published cases [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- Case reports give no rate and outcomes were not reported for every case [18].
Copper deficiency from excess zinc
Case reports: excess zinc led to copper deficiency with anemia and nerve damage, with blood counts usually recovering after zinc was stopped.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Three men developed zinc-induced copper deficiency, recognized on bone marrow examination: anemia and severe neutropenia, with progressive peripheral neuropathy in two [14]. A review of 37 published cases found elemental zinc doses from about 50 mg to more than 1,500 mg a day for weeks to years, from supplements, denture adhesive creams and swallowed coins. Anemia was present in nearly all cases, most often with neutropenia, and serum copper was low in every case. Blood counts recovered in most within weeks to months after zinc was stopped and copper given, while nerve damage improved more slowly and sometimes incompletely [15].
- Population
- Three case reports, including one man on prescribed zinc for acrodermatitis enteropathica [14]; 37 cases in 34 publications from 1972 to 2025 [15].
- Sources
- [14], [15]
- Caveats
- Case reports cannot give a rate. Bone marrow findings often led to an initial misdiagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome [15].
Loss of smell from intranasal zinc
Case reports: people lost their sense of smell after intranasal zinc gel. FDA states it received over 130 such reports by 2009.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- All 17 patients presenting with smell loss after intranasal zinc gluconate gel had impaired olfaction on testing. They reported deep sniffing, immediate burning, and smell loss within 48 hours. Seven never developed cold symptoms [16]. The FDA states it had received more than 130 reports of anosmia linked to Zicam intranasal zinc products by 2009 [17].
- Population
- Retrospective clinic case series [16]; FDA adverse event reports [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- This concerns nasal gel and swabs, not oral zinc.
Stroke in people with dementia
Linked to ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack at higher Z-drug doses in one cohort of people with dementia, with minimal or inconsistent risk at lower doses.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among people with dementia, those prescribed higher-dose Z-drugs had more ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack than non-users with sleep disturbance over 2 years (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.10). Mortality, infection and venous thromboembolism showed minimal or inconsistent excess risk [25].
- Population
- 3,532 people with dementia newly prescribed Z-drugs and 1,833 non-users with sleep disturbance in England, mean age 83 [25].
- Sources
- [25]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort in England, with doses defined in zopiclone equivalents. The abstract gives no absolute rate.
Dependence and misuse
The label warns zolpidem may lead to physical or psychological dependence, with risk rising with dose, duration and a history of alcohol or drug abuse.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Zolpidem, eszopiclone and zaleplon are Schedule IV controlled substances. The zolpidem label states that the risk of dependence increases with dose and duration, and that available data cannot provide a reliable estimate of the incidence of dependence at labeled doses. In people with a history of drug abuse, single doses of zolpidem 40 mg had effects similar to diazepam 20 mg, while 10 mg was difficult to tell from placebo [13]. In people with a history of benzodiazepine abuse, eszopiclone 6 and 12 mg produced euphoric effects similar to diazepam 20 mg [7]. A review of published case reports found 36 cases of zolpidem dependence, with doses in extreme cases 30 to 120 times the labeled dose. Most patients had a history of drug or alcohol abuse or another psychiatric condition [26].
- Population
- Abuse-liability studies in people with a history of drug abuse [13][7]; 36 published cases for zolpidem and 22 for zopiclone [26].
- Sources
- [13], [7], [26]
- Caveats
- Case reports have no denominator, and the label states no rate can be given. The case review judged the relative incidence of reported dependence to be lower than for benzodiazepines used for sleep [26].
Alcohol and other sedating drugs
The label states alcohol and other central nervous system depressants add to zolpidem's effects, with additive impairment measured in single-dose studies. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The zolpidem label names benzodiazepines, opioids, tricyclic antidepressants and alcohol as adding to central nervous system depression. In single-dose studies in healthy volunteers, alcohol with zolpidem had an additive adverse effect on psychomotor performance, the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine had an additive effect of decreased alertness, and the antipsychotic chlorpromazine had an additive effect on alertness and psychomotor performance. Sertraline increased exposure to zolpidem, and fluoxetine lengthened its half-life by 17% with no additive psychomotor effect [13]. The eszopiclone label states the same additive effects for benzodiazepines, opioids, tricyclic antidepressants and alcohol [7].
- Population
- Healthy volunteers in single-dose interaction studies summarized in labeling [13].
- Sources
- [13], [7]
- Caveats
- The label gives no counts or rates, and notes that single-dose studies do not predict effects of long-term use together.
Worsening depression and suicidal thoughts
Linked to a higher rate of suicide or suicide attempt in zolpidem users than non-users across four observational studies, which cannot separate the drug from insomnia or depression.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that worsening of depression and suicidal thoughts and actions, including completed suicides, have been reported in primarily depressed people treated with sedative hypnotics. In long-term zolpidem trials, depression was reported by 2% against 1% on placebo [13]. A meta-analysis of four observational studies found more suicide or suicide attempts in zolpidem users than non-users (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.30) and more suicide deaths (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.30) [29].
- Population
- 344,753 participants in four studies, 42,279 of them zolpidem users [29].
- Sources
- [13], [29]
- Caveats
- Observational. Insomnia and depression are themselves tied to suicide, so the association may reflect who is prescribed zolpidem. No absolute rate is given.
Temporary memory loss after cold water swimming
Case series: 9 women aged 55 to 82 had transient global amnesia during or just after sea swimming, all recovering fully within 24 hours.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At one Irish coastal hospital from 2019 to 2024, 9 patients had transient global amnesia directly related to sea swimming in water of 9.2°C to 18°C. Symptoms lasted 1 to 7 hours, brain imaging showed no acute change, and all recovered fully within 24 hours [37]. Interviews with 11 UK open water swimmers described similar episodes of confusion, disorientation and repetitive questioning [38].
- Population
- 9 women [37]. 11 swimmers, 7 of them women [38].
- Sources
- [37], [38]
- Caveats
- Case series with no denominator. Most of the interviewed swimmers had no formal diagnosis [38].
Anxiety or distress about readings
Limited evidence: a systematic review found too little evidence to establish or exclude psychological harm from visible glucose readings in adults without diabetes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 12 studies of participant-visible sensors in adults without diabetes judged the psychosocial evidence insufficient to establish benefit or exclude harm, and found evidence on device burden sparse [19].
- Population
- Adults without diabetes in 12 studies [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- Certainty was rated very low for psychosocial outcomes [19].
Seizures from oxygen toxicity
Case series: 43 seizures occurred in 188,335 sessions at one center over 20 years, between 1.2 and 3.9 per 10,000 treatments.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Seizures occurred at 3.9 per 10,000 treatments before the center added a 5-minute air break to its protocol and 1.2 per 10,000 after (P < 0.0001). They came a median of 57 minutes into a session and after a median of 21 sessions [29].
- Population
- All patients treated at one center from 1999 to 2018, for medical indications such as ulcers, hearing loss and radiation injury [29].
- Sources
- [29]
- Caveats
- One center, treating at 2 ATA or more for medical indications under supervision.
Adverse events in controlled trials
Small trials found dizziness, nausea and headache rising with dose, and no serious adverse events. Higher doses raised drug liking ratings.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dried kratom leaf powder in healthy adults who had not used kratom, no serious adverse events or deaths were reported. Treatment-emergent adverse events generally rose with dose. Dizziness, nausea and a feeling of relaxation were most common after single doses, and headache, feeling hot, raised alanine aminotransferase (a liver enzyme) and nausea after 15 daily doses [6]. In the same trial, abuse-related adverse events were more frequent at higher doses, drug-effect ratings exceeded placebo only at the highest single dose, and no participant met thresholds for clinically meaningful opioid withdrawal [7]. In a randomized, double-blind trial in recreational drug users with opioid experience, somnolence, vomiting and nausea were the most common adverse events. Kratom constricted the pupils at every dose above the lowest, and the highest dose raised ratings of drug liking and feeling high [8].
- Population
- 116 adults aged 18 to 55, 49 on kratom across four dose levels and 67 on placebo, given single doses and then 15 daily doses [6][7]. 40 recreational polydrug users, 6 on kratom and 2 on placebo in each of five cohorts, given single doses [8].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- [6] and [7] report the same trial, of one product, in healthy adults screened to exclude certain liver enzyme gene variants [6]. The authors of [8] note that its results may not represent other kratom products. Trials of a few weeks cannot show the dependence, liver injury or deaths reported in long-term users.
Poison center reports
Limited evidence: of 1,320 US poison center phenibut exposures, 12.6% had major, life-threatening effects and three people died.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- From 2009 to 2019, US poison centers recorded 1,320 phenibut exposures, rising sharply after 2015. The most common effects were agitation (30.4%), drowsiness (29.0%), fast heart rate (21.9%) and confusion (21.3%). Coma occurred in 6.2%. Major, life-threatening effects occurred in 12.6%, and three deaths were reported. Among phenibut-only exposures, 10.2% had major effects [12]. A Minnesota poison center recorded 56 calls from 2000 to 2018, 86% in the last five years. 19.6% of patients were intubated, and 10.7% had withdrawal concerns [13]. A poison center in northern Germany received 17 inquiries about phenibut from 2008 to 2022. Overdoses were reported in 15, and 8 of those people were somnolent. No respiratory depression or coma was recorded [14].
- Population
- Exposures reported to US poison centers [12][13] and to a German poison center [14].
- Sources
- [12], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Other substances were involved in 40.2% of adult US cases [12]. Reports are voluntary and cannot give a rate among all users.
Toxicity and withdrawal in case reports
Case reports: toxicity brought altered mental state and psychosis, often needing intubation, and withdrawal brought agitation, insomnia, psychosis and sometimes seizures.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 62 published cases found altered mental state, sleepiness, psychosis and movement disorders in toxicity, and 48.7% of toxicity cases needed intubation. Withdrawal brought anxiety, agitation, insomnia and psychosis. 95.7% of withdrawal cases involved daily use, and 69.6% needed several medicines to treat. Hospital stays averaged 5.0 days for toxicity and 7.7 days for withdrawal [15]. A review of 22 withdrawal cases found severe psychomotor agitation, with signs that can mimic serotonin syndrome or neuroleptic malignant syndrome [16]. A 2023 systematic review of 25 withdrawal reports found seizures in 8%, intubation in 24% and intensive care admission in 44%. Withdrawal began as soon as two hours after the last dose, and 76% needed at least two drug therapies [17].
- Population
- Published case reports and conference abstracts [15][16][17].
- Sources
- [15], [16], [17]
- Caveats
- 63.2% of cases in [15] also involved other addictive substances, mostly benzodiazepines and alcohol. In [17], patterns and outcomes were similar with phenibut alone and with other substances. Case reports cannot give a rate.
Adverse events in clinical trials
Limited evidence: in 11 trials, adverse events occurred in 5.66% of patients, mostly sleepiness. The trials were not designed to detect dependence.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 11 clinical trials (583 patients), mostly from Eastern Europe, found adverse events in 5.66% of patients, most often sleepiness (1.89%). The authors note that these differ from the dependence and intoxication seen in case reports [18].
- Population
- Patients in prescribed-use trials and 16 patients in case reports [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- Most authors were from the Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis [18]. The trials were not designed to detect dependence.
Falls and fainting injuries
Case series: among 209 people treated for sauna injuries at one trauma center, 57.5% of injuries followed a slip or fall and 30.0% followed dizziness or fainting.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 17 years, 209 patients had 274 diagnoses, including bruises and sprains (41.2%), wounds (28.8%), fractures (15.3%), concussions (5.5%), burns (1.5%) and brain bleeding (1.1%). Head and face injuries mostly followed dizziness or fainting. Nine patients (4.3%) needed surgery [39].
- Population
- 209 patients treated at the trauma center of the Medical University of Innsbruck, 2005 to 2021 [39].
- Sources
- [39]
- Caveats
- One hospital, with no count of how many sauna visits these injuries came from.
Preoccupation with sleep data (orthosomnia)
Case reports: patients sought treatment for sleep problems they inferred from tracker data. One survey classified 3 to 14% of respondents as having orthosomnia.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2017 case report described patients seeking treatment for self-diagnosed sleep disturbance based on tracker data, and named the pattern orthosomnia, a perfectionistic pursuit of ideal sleep. The patients often trusted tracker data over polysomnography or actigraphy [23]. In a cross-sectional survey of 523 people, 176 regularly used a sleep tracker, and an algorithm written by the authors classified 3.0% (95% CI 1.6 to 4.5), 8.6% (95% CI 6.2 to 11.0) or 14.0% (95% CI 10.9 to 16.9) of the sample as having orthosomnia under conservative, moderate or lenient cutoffs. Those classified had higher insomnia scores [24].
- Population
- Patients seeking treatment for sleep complaints [23]. 523 adults in a general population survey [24].
- Sources
- [23], [24]
- Caveats
- Case reports cannot give a rate. The survey was cross-sectional and required insomnia symptoms as part of its definition, so it cannot show that tracker use causes the pattern. The classification algorithm was devised by the survey's authors [24].
Daytime symptoms after negative sleep feedback
One trial found people with insomnia given sham negative sleep feedback reported more daytime sleepiness and less alertness than those given sham positive feedback.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Participants were randomized to receive sham feedback that their sleep efficiency had been high or low. Those given negative feedback reported lower alert cognition (d = 0.79) and more sleepiness and fatigue (d = 0.55) in the evening than those given positive feedback. Tests of sleep-related attentional bias (d = 0.20) and psychomotor vigilance (d = 0.12) did not differ [25].
- Population
- 63 adults meeting DSM-5 criteria for insomnia disorder, one day [25].
- Sources
- [25]
- Caveats
- The feedback was sham and delivered through a research actigraphy watch made to simulate a wearable, so the trial did not test a consumer tracker. One day, in people with insomnia only [25].
Adverse events in published reports
A scoping review found 16 documented adverse events after whole-body cryotherapy in 5 case reports and 2 trials, 4 of them graded serious.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The 16 events were cold panniculitis, transient global amnesia, cerebral bleeding, moyamoya syndrome and aortic dissection from case reports, and 11 minor events in trials: headache, discomfort or dizziness, lasting shivering, raised blood pressure and hives. The reviewers rated causality possible or probable for the case reports and concluded the risks were within acceptable limits when contraindications are followed [25].
- Population
- Five case reports and two randomized trials [25].
- Sources
- [25], [2]
- Caveats
- The review's authors are a consortium of cryotherapy researchers. Events were counted only if published, and a Cochrane review found that none of its trials actively monitored adverse events [2].
Brain and blood vessel events
Case reports: transient global amnesia in a 63-year-old man and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in a teenager, each following a session.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 63-year-old man had transient global amnesia after a session and recovered completely within 24 hours [30]. An adolescent developed reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome after a session, a condition that carries a risk of bleeding in the brain and stroke [31]. A scoping review lists further single cases of cerebral bleeding and moyamoya syndrome [25].
- Population
- Single case reports [30][31].
- Sources
- [30], [31], [25]
- Caveats
- Case reports cannot give a rate or prove cause. The amnesia patient also reported heavy work stress, another known trigger [25].
Symptom preoccupation and health care use in people with atrial fibrillation
Linked to more symptom monitoring, treatment concern and health care use in one study of 172 patients with atrial fibrillation who did or did not use a wearable.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Compared with non-users, wearable users reported higher rates of symptom monitoring and preoccupation (P = 0.03) and more concerns about treatment (P = 0.02). Of wearable users, 20% reported anxiety and always contacting their doctor in response to irregular rhythm notifications. After matching, users had more atrial fibrillation care over 9 months (P = 0.04), including more ECGs, echocardiograms and ablation procedures [20].
- Population
- 172 patients with atrial fibrillation, mean age 72.6, 42% women, of whom 83 used a wearable [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- Observational and retrospective, in older patients with a diagnosed heart rhythm condition. It cannot show the wearable caused the difference, and the authors call for randomized studies [20].
Mixed results100
Aspirin for people without cardiovascular disease
Mixed results: aspirin cut first cardiovascular events by about 11%, 1 in 265 people, while raising major bleeding by 1 in 210.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- Across 13 trials, aspirin lowered the composite cardiovascular outcome (HR 0.89, 95% credible interval 0.84 to 0.95, absolute reduction 0.38%, number needed to treat 265) and raised major bleeding (HR 1.43, 95% credible interval 1.30 to 1.56, absolute increase 0.47%, number needed to harm 210) [11]. An earlier individual-data analysis found serious vascular events at 0.51% a year on aspirin against 0.57% on control, with no difference in vascular death (0.19% against 0.19%) [2]. Of the three 2018 trials, one in adults aged 70 or over found no significant drop in cardiovascular disease (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08) [12], one in moderate-risk adults found events in 4.29% against 4.48% (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.13) [13], and one in diabetes found serious vascular events in 8.5% against 9.6% (rate ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.97) with major bleeding in 4.1% against 3.2% [14]. In 2022 the US Preventive Services Task Force concluded that the net benefit in adults aged 40 to 59 with a 10-year cardiovascular risk of 10% or more is small, and advised against starting low-dose aspirin for primary prevention at age 60 or older [15].
- Population
- 164,225 participants in 13 trials, median age 62 [11]; primary prevention trials with individual participant data [2]; 19,114 adults aged 70 or over [12]; 12,546 moderate-risk adults [13]; 15,480 adults with diabetes [14].
- Sources
- [11], [2], [12], [13], [14], [15]
- Caveats
- The band above is the number needed to treat of 265. The trial in diabetes concluded that the absolute benefits were largely counterbalanced by bleeding [14]. Only one guideline body's statement was read for this page.
Depression, compared with antidepressant medication
Not shown to differ from antidepressants at the end of treatment. A few trials favored CBT 6 to 12 months later, and CBT plus medication outperformed medication alone.
Compared with antidepressant medication [3][4][5]; medication alone, against CBT plus medication [3][4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- CBT did not differ from pharmacotherapy in the short term, and was larger at 6 to 12 months (g 0.34, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.58), from a small number of trials and not in all sensitivity analyses. CBT plus medication outperformed medication alone in the short term (g 0.51) and long term (g 0.32), and did not differ from CBT alone [3]. An earlier analysis found no difference between CBT and medication, and combined treatment ahead of medication alone (g 0.49) [4]. Across 67 head-to-head trials of psychotherapy and antidepressants for depressive and anxiety disorders, the overall difference was g 0.02 (95% CI -0.07 to 0.10) [5].
- Population
- 52,702 patients [3]. 115 studies [4]. 5,993 patients in 67 trials, 40 in depressive disorders [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The head-to-head analysis covers all psychotherapies, not CBT alone [5]. The long-term advantage rests on few trials [3].
Stroke
Mixed results: higher total cholesterol went with fewer bleeding strokes in pooled cohorts, and higher non-HDL cholesterol with slightly more ischemic strokes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 23 prospective studies, the relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.69 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.81) for high against low total cholesterol and 0.85 (0.80 to 0.91) per 1 mmol/L higher [11]. In 61 prospective studies, total cholesterol showed no independent positive association with death from stroke, and at ages 70 to 89 and at systolic blood pressure above about 145 mm Hg it was negatively related to death from hemorrhagic and total stroke [5]. In 68 pooled cohorts, the hazard ratio for ischemic stroke was 1.12 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.20) per 43 mg/dL higher non-HDL cholesterol [6].
- Population
- 1,430,141 participants with 7,960 hemorrhagic strokes [11]. Almost 900,000 adults with about 12,000 stroke deaths [5]. 302,430 people with 2,534 ischemic strokes [6].
- Sources
- [11], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Observational. The authors of the largest analysis call the absence of a positive link with stroke death unexplained, and note that statin trials reduce total stroke rates [5].
Focus and studying in people without ADHD
Mixed results: healthy adults showed small gains on some memory and attention tests, no effect of d-amphetamine in one meta-analysis, and lower-quality effort on a complex task.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 48 studies found small but significant effects of methylphenidate and amphetamine on inhibitory control and short-term episodic memory, and medium effects on delayed episodic memory. The authors concluded the overall effect was probably modest after accounting for publication bias [13]. A second set of meta-analyses found an overall effect of methylphenidate (SMD 0.21), driven by recall (SMD 0.43), sustained attention (SMD 0.42) and inhibitory control (SMD 0.27), and no effects for d-amphetamine [14]. In a trial using a complex optimization task, methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine lowered the value of the solutions reached against placebo. Time and steps spent rose while the quality of effort fell [15]. A systematic review of nonmedical use found little evidence that it improves academic performance in people without ADHD [16].
- Population
- 1,409 healthy participants in 48 studies [13]; healthy adults who were not sleep deprived in 24 methylphenidate studies and 10 d-amphetamine studies [14]; adults in one placebo-controlled experiment [15]; 111 studies of nonmedical use, mostly in college students [16].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Laboratory tests after single doses, which the authors of [14] said do not reflect how the drugs are used. Not an approved use. See the boxed warning and the misuse block below.
Falling asleep
Shown to shorten time to fall asleep only at about five standard drinks, in pooled studies of healthy adults. REM sleep fell even at two drinks.
Compared with a no-alcohol condition the abstract does not describe [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Shorter sleep onset and quicker deep sleep appeared only after a high dose of 0.85 g per kg or more, about five standard drinks. REM sleep was delayed and shortened from a low dose of 0.50 g per kg or less, about two drinks, worsening with dose. Effects on total sleep time, sleep efficiency and waking during the night were too uncertain to determine [10].
- Population
- Healthy adults in 27 studies [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Laboratory nights after a set dose. The review notes faster sleep onset at high doses likely worsens later REM disruption [10].
Recovery after ischemic stroke (citicoline)
Mixed results: pooled trials found citicoline raised the odds of independence after stroke, but the largest trial, 2,298 patients, found no difference in recovery.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 10 double-blind trials found higher odds of independence with citicoline (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.16, random effects). In patients also treated with rtPA the benefit was described as limited [4]. The largest trial, ICTUS, randomized 2,298 patients and was stopped for futility. Global recovery at 90 days did not differ (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.25) [5].
- Population
- Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated within 14 days [4]; moderate to severe stroke treated within 24 hours, 1,000 mg every 12 hours for 6 weeks [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The pooled analysis and the largest trial disagree. ICTUS was funded by Ferrer Grupo, which makes citicoline [5]. Several authors appear on both papers.
Nerve pain
Mixed results: Cochrane reviews found no unbiased evidence for amitriptyline or nortriptyline in nerve pain, while a broader meta-analysis found tricyclics needed fewer treated per responder than other classes.
Compared with placebo [3][4][5]; gabapentin, morphine and other antidepressants [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 17 amitriptyline studies, only third-tier evidence existed, and amitriptyline beat placebo in two of seven studies reporting usable efficacy data. At least one adverse event occurred in 55% on amitriptyline and 36% on placebo (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8) [3]. In a meta-analysis of 229 studies of nerve pain drugs, numbers needed to treat were lower for tricyclic antidepressants than the 6.4 to 7.7 found for SNRIs, pregabalin and gabapentin [4]. Nortriptyline trials gave very low quality evidence of efficacy similar to gabapentin, morphine, chlorimipramine, amitriptyline and placebo [5].
- Population
- 1,342 adults in 17 studies across seven nerve pain conditions [3]; 229 studies of oral and topical drugs [4]; 310 adults in six nortriptyline studies [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Most amitriptyline studies were small and at high risk of bias. The Cochrane authors write that the concern is overestimation of the effect, not proof of no effect [3].
Stress and anxiety
Mixed results: most reviews found lower stress and anxiety than placebo in adults, with very high variation, while one review found no change in perceived stress.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 12 RCTs (1,002 participants aged 25 to 48), ashwagandha lowered anxiety (SMD -1.55, 95% CI -2.37 to -0.74, I² 93.8%) and stress (SMD -1.75, 95% CI -2.29 to -1.22, I² 83.1%) compared with placebo [1]. In 14 trials in people with mental disorders, mostly anxiety disorders, anxiety fell (outlier-corrected SMD -1.13, 95% CI -1.65 to -0.60) and so did stress (SMD -0.95, 95% CI -1.46 to -0.43) [2]. A 2026 analysis of 22 trials reported lower stress (SMD -5.88, 95% CI -8.15 to -3.60) and anxiety (SMD -6.87, 95% CI -8.77 to -4.97), with stress falling further as dose rose [3]. A 2025 analysis of 6 trials found no change in Perceived Stress Scale scores (SMD -0.355, 95% CI -1.188 to 0.47) [4].
- Population
- Adults in 12 RCTs [1]. 360 people with mental disorders on ashwagandha and 353 controls [2]. Adults in 22 RCTs [3]. 488 participants in 7 cortisol and 6 stress trials [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Certainty was rated low for both outcomes in [1], and heterogeneity was very high. The mental disorders review was limited by few studies, substantial heterogeneity and outliers [2]. The effect sizes in [3] are several times those in the other reviews. The abstracts do not report funding of the included trials.
Atomoxetine against stimulants
Mixed results: in head-to-head comparisons, amphetamines reduced clinician-rated ADHD symptoms more than atomoxetine in both children and adults.
Compared with amphetamines and methylphenidate [1]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In head-to-head comparisons, the only efficacy differences favored amphetamines over atomoxetine, methylphenidate and modafinil, with SMDs of -0.46 to -0.24 in children and -0.94 to -0.29 in adults [1].
- Population
- 133 trials in children, adolescents and adults [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Most comparisons were indirect and rated low or very low confidence [1].
Bipolar disorder, preventing new episodes
Mixed results: most maintenance drugs lowered relapse against placebo in a network meta-analysis, while the estimate for aripiprazole did not reach significance.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of 33 trials of 17 maintenance treatments, all lowered the risk of any mood relapse or recurrence against placebo except aripiprazole (RR 0.62, 95% credible interval 0.38 to 1.03), carbamazepine, imipramine and paliperidone [7]. The quetiapine label describes maintenance use at 400 to 800 mg a day as an add-on to lithium or divalproex [3].
- Population
- 6,846 participants in 33 trials published from 1970 to 2012 [7].
- Sources
- [7], [3]
- Caveats
- The abstract does not give the estimate for quetiapine. The authors judged the supporting evidence strongest for lithium.
Memory and attention in healthy adults
Mixed results: reviews found faster reaction times and better memory in adults on standardized extracts, while a 12-week trial in adults with memory complaints found no change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 9 RCTs of standardized extracts taken for 12 weeks or more (518 subjects), Trail B time shortened by 17.9 ms (95% CI -24.6 to -11.2) and choice reaction time by 10.6 ms (95% CI -12.1 to -9.2) [1]. A systematic review of 6 trials found bacopa improved 9 of 17 tests of memory free recall, with little evidence in other cognitive domains [2]. In one 90-day trial (62 completers), KeenMind at 2 × 150 mg improved spatial working memory accuracy [3]. A 2026 network meta-analysis found that 600 mg a day or more improved working memory against placebo (SMD 2.03, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.78), and 300 to under 600 mg a day improved delayed memory. Sustained attention, selective attention and processing speed did not differ [4]. In adults with self-reported memory problems, 300 mg a day of Bacumen for 12 weeks did not change verbal learning (p = 0.391), attention (p = 0.713) or working memory (p = 0.610) against placebo [5].
- Population
- Adults without dementia [1][2][3]. 2,107 healthy adults in 29 RCTs of bacopa or ginkgo [4]. 87 completers aged 40 to 70 [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Trials were small. Three different extracts were used at 300 to 450 mg a day [2]. The reviews disagree on attention [1][4], and the network analysis had few direct comparisons [4]. The abstracts of [1], [2] and [3] do not report funding. The lead author of [5] directs a contract research organization that has received nutraceutical company funding.
Anxiety treatment beyond three months
Mixed results: in trials of 13 weeks or more, anxiety scores did not differ from placebo, while fewer people stopped a benzodiazepine than placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 8 studies lasting 13 weeks or more, the change in Hamilton Anxiety scores did not differ significantly between benzodiazepines and placebo. Fewer people discontinued a benzodiazepine than placebo, and constipation and dry mouth were more frequent. Among people who had responded in the first 8 weeks, benzodiazepines and antidepressants did not differ on any outcome [13].
- Population
- 1,228 people with anxiety disorders in 8 randomized or maintenance studies [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Few studies. The abstract gives no effect sizes [13].
88 more
Heart attack and stroke in high blood pressure
Shown to lower stroke by about 20% against placebo in high blood pressure, with no drop in deaths and more strokes than on other drug classes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 13 trials, beta-blockers did not lower all-cause mortality against placebo (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.11). Total cardiovascular disease fell (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.97), reflecting fewer strokes (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.96), with no difference in coronary heart disease (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.07). Stroke was more frequent than on calcium channel blockers (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.40) or renin-angiotensin drugs (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.53) [12]. For atenolol, 4 placebo-controlled trials found no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.15) or heart attack (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.19), and 5 trials against other drugs found higher mortality on atenolol (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25) [13].
- Population
- 13 trials, with 23,613 people in placebo comparisons and 40,245 people on beta-blockers overall, three quarters of them on atenolol [12]; 6,825 people in 4 placebo-controlled atenolol trials and 17,671 in 5 comparative trials, mean 4.6 years [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Most of the evidence is for atenolol. The Cochrane authors rated most trials at high risk of bias and found no outcome trials of newer vasodilating beta-blockers [12].
ADHD symptoms, rated by those closest to treatment
Mixed results: neurofeedback lowered ADHD ratings slightly (SMD 0.35) when rated by those closest to treatment, the least blinded raters, an effect that disappeared under blinded ratings.
Compared with control conditions in randomized trials, rated by the assessors closest to the treatment setting [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- With ratings from the assessors most proximal to the treatment setting, the least blinded measure, neurofeedback lowered total ADHD symptoms (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.59), inattention (0.36) and hyperactivity-impulsivity (0.26). The same trials showed no significant effect when probably blinded ratings were used [6].
- Population
- 520 children and adolescents in 13 trials [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- These were the least blinded measures in the review. Only 4 studies checked whether children learned to change their brain activity [6].
Added to another antidepressant
Mixed results: remission was 27% to 30% when bupropion was added to an antidepressant in three large trials, none with a placebo arm.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After citalopram alone had not brought remission, adding sustained-release bupropion gave a remission rate of 29.7% and adding buspirone 30.1%. Bupropion lowered self-rated symptom scores more (25.3% vs 17.1%) and fewer people stopped it for intolerance (12.5% vs 20.6%) [9]. In US veterans, remission at 12 weeks was 26.9% with added bupropion, 28.9% with added aripiprazole and 22.3% after a switch to bupropion, and the bupropion comparisons were not significant [10]. In adults 60 and older, remission was 28.2% with added bupropion, 28.9% with added aripiprazole and 19.3% after a switch to bupropion [11].
- Population
- Adults whose depression had not remitted on citalopram [9]; 1,522 veterans, 85% men, mean age 54 [10]; 619 adults aged 60 and older with treatment-resistant depression [11].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- No trial here compared added bupropion with added placebo, so the share of remission due to bupropion is unknown. The abstract of [9] does not give the number randomized.
Compared with benzodiazepines
Mixed results: anxiety scores fell as much as on benzodiazepines, while response was slightly less likely and more people stopped treatment.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against benzodiazepines in generalized anxiety, azapirones gave the same reduction in symptoms (MD -0.12, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.45, 34 studies) and a slightly lower response rate (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99). More people stopped azapirones (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.53). Azapirones caused less sedation, fatigue, drowsiness, weakness and cognitive complaints than benzodiazepines, at a level resembling placebo, and more headache and nausea [1]. An earlier Cochrane review judged that azapirones may reduce anxiety less than benzodiazepines and found fewer people stopped benzodiazepines [2].
- Population
- 3,160 participants in 34 studies comparing azapirones with benzodiazepines [1]; 36 trials [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Confidence in the comparison with benzodiazepines was rated moderate to low [1]. Short trials.
Antibodies against older preventive drugs
Mixed results: in one trial erenumab halved migraine days in 55% against 31% on topiramate, but a network analysis found no significant difference from topiramate or divalproex.
Compared with topiramate [4]; topiramate and divalproex, indirectly through placebo [1]; topiramate, propranolol and onabotulinumtoxinA, indirectly [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 24 weeks, 10.6% stopped erenumab for adverse events against 38.9% on topiramate (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.27), and 55.4% against 31.2% had at least a 50% drop in monthly migraine days (OR 2.76, 95% CI 2.06 to 3.71) [4]. A network meta-analysis found no significant difference in migraine days between the antibodies and topiramate (WMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.17) or divalproex [1]. The antibodies had higher help-to-harm ratios than propranolol, topiramate or onabotulinumtoxinA [3].
- Population
- 777 adults with at least 4 migraine days a month in Germany [4]; trials of antibodies, topiramate and divalproex [1].
- Sources
- [4], [1], [3]
- Caveats
- One head-to-head trial, in which topiramate was dosed to the level each person tolerated [4]. The network comparison was indirect [1].
Anxiety disorders, compared with medication
Mixed results: head-to-head trials found psychotherapy and antidepressants similar overall, while a broader analysis found larger before-and-after improvements with medication.
Compared with antidepressant medication in head-to-head trials [5]; medication arms in separate trials, before and after treatment in the same people [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 67 head-to-head trials, psychotherapy and antidepressants did not differ overall (g 0.02). Psychotherapy outperformed medication for obsessive compulsive disorder (g 0.64) [5]. Across 234 trials, average improvement from before to after treatment was larger with medication (d 2.02) than with psychotherapy (d 1.22), with individual CBT at d 1.30 and pill placebo at d 1.29 [7].
- Population
- 27 head-to-head trials in anxiety disorders, among 5,993 patients [5]. 37,333 patients in 234 trials [7].
- Sources
- [5], [7]
- Caveats
- The before-and-after comparison sets arms of different trials side by side, which is weaker than a head-to-head trial [7]. The head-to-head analysis covers all psychotherapies [5].
Stress
Mixed results: pooled trials found lower stress 12 hours after immersion and no difference immediately, at 1 hour, at 24 hours or at 48 hours.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of randomized trials in healthy adults found stress lower 12 hours after immersion (SMD -1.00, 95% CI -1.40 to -0.61), with no significant effect immediately (SMD -0.09), at 1 hour (SMD -0.29), at 24 hours (SMD -0.06) or at 48 hours (SMD 0.09) [14]. In 16 adults, cortisol was lower 180 minutes after a 15-minute immersion at 10°C than before it (p = 0.014) [15]. During 1-hour immersions at 14°C, cortisol tended to decrease [16].
- Population
- 3,177 participants in 11 randomized trials, at 7°C to 15°C for 30 seconds to 2 hours [14]. 16 healthy adults [15]. Young men [16].
- Sources
- [14], [15], [16]
- Caveats
- One time point of five showed an effect. The reviewers describe the evidence as limited by few trials, small samples and narrow populations [14]. The single-session studies had no control condition [15].
Focus and thinking
Mixed results: two meta-analyses found better scores on some attention and executive tasks, while a 3-year trial of cocoa extract found no change in overall thinking.
Compared with control conditions the abstract does not describe [8]; control groups [9]; placebo [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Regular dark chocolate or cocoa improved Trail Making Test part A (WMD -4.51) and part B (WMD -13.1) and verbal fluency (WMD 3.15), with larger effects at 500 mg of flavanols a day or more and 8 weeks or longer. Memory results were inconsistent and Mini-Mental State scores did not improve [8]. In 7 trials in healthy adults, executive function time fell (WMD -11.77, 95% CI -22.49 to -1.05) [9]. In 2,262 older adults, 3 years of cocoa extract with 500 mg of flavanols did not change global cognition (mean z 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08) [10].
- Population
- 2,847 participants in 16 trials [8]. Healthy adults in 7 trials [9]. 2,262 adults with mean age 73 [10].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- The two meta-analyses share trials. The large trial tested an extract by telephone assessments in older adults [10].
Headache
Mixed results: headache pain did not differ from other treatments in the short term, while headache-related disability improved more in tension-type and cervicogenic headache.
Compared with other interventions [16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Short-term headache pain did not differ from other interventions in tension-type headache (SMD -1.27, 95% CI -3.56 to 1.03, 230 participants), cervicogenic headache (SMD -0.41, 95% CI -4.69 to 3.87) or mixed headache including migraine (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.48). Disability improved more in tension-type headache (SMD -2.28, 95% CI -2.66 to -1.91) and cervicogenic headache (SMD -0.72, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.34) [16].
- Population
- 11 trials, 9 pooled, of people with tension-type, cervicogenic or migraine headache [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- Only 4 trials were of high quality, and the evidence on pain was rated very low quality [16].
Stroke in trials of folic acid
Mixed results: folic acid cut first stroke 21% in Chinese adults with hypertension, while a pooled analysis of 8 other trials found no significant effect.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Chinese trial, enalapril with folic acid 0.8 mg lowered first stroke compared with enalapril alone (2.7% against 3.4%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.93) over a median 4.5 years. Heart attack (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.82) and death from any cause (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.10) did not differ [9]. In a meta-analysis of 8 trials of folic acid in people at raised cardiovascular risk, the rate ratio for stroke was 0.96 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.06) and for major vascular events 1.01 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.05) [10]. A Cochrane review of B vitamin trials found a small reduction in stroke against placebo (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, 10 trials) and no difference in heart attack (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.10) [11].
- Population
- 20,702 adults with hypertension and no history of stroke or heart attack [9]. 37,485 participants in 8 trials, median follow-up 5 years [10]. 71,422 participants in 15 trials [11].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [11]
- Caveats
- These trials assigned folic acid, alone or with other B vitamins, and report outcomes by assigned treatment, not by the folate level reached. The Cochrane authors note that the stroke evidence for folic acid with enalapril came from one very large trial [11].
Pregnancy and child outcomes
Mixed results: low free T4 in pregnancy was linked to lower child IQ and preterm birth, while a trial that treated low free T4 found no change in IQ.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a Dutch birth cohort, maternal free T4 in early pregnancy had an inverted U-shaped association with child IQ, with both low and high concentrations corresponding to a 1.4 to 3.8 point lower mean IQ [11]. In pooled data on 47,045 pregnant women, preterm birth occurred in 7.1% of women with a low free T4 and normal TSH against 5.0% of women with normal results (odds ratio 1.46, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.90) [12]. In a trial of 526 pregnant women with free T4 below 0.86 ng/dL and normal TSH, median child IQ was 94 with levothyroxine and 91 with placebo (P = 0.30), with no significant differences in other pregnancy or neonatal outcomes [6].
- Population
- 3,839 mother and child pairs, with IQ tested at a median age of 6 [11]. 47,045 pregnant women in 19 cohorts [12]. 526 women randomized at a mean of 17.8 weeks of pregnancy [6].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [6]
- Caveats
- A marker that tracks an outcome is not always one whose correction changes it. The cohort findings are observational, and the trial began treatment between 8 and 20 weeks of pregnancy [6].
Sleep
Mixed results: gabapentin improved sleep measures in people with medical illness in one meta-analysis, while a review of trials in insomnia called the results inconclusive.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people with sleep disturbance alongside a medical illness, gabapentin beat placebo on five of six composite sleep endpoints, for example SMD 0.50 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.71) on one. People on gabapentin left treatment more often (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.76), at an average dose of about 1,800 mg a day [14]. A systematic review of gabapentin and pregabalin for insomnia found inconclusive results and minimal evidence [13].
- Population
- 4,684 participants in 26 studies of people with medical illness [14]; trials of gabapentinoids in insomnia [13].
- Sources
- [14], [13]
- Caveats
- Not an approved use. The positive analysis was in people whose poor sleep came with another illness, and its authors asked for trials in primary sleep disorders [14].
Symptoms of dementia
Mixed results: some reviews found small cognition gains in dementia, mostly with one branded extract, while others found inconsistent or no benefit.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of 36 trials found inconsistent results for cognition, daily living, mood and carer burden. Of the 4 most recent trials, 3 found no difference from placebo and 1 found very large effects. In 925 Alzheimer's patients from 9 trials there was no consistent benefit [1]. A meta-analysis of 9 EGb 761 trials (2,372 patients) found cognition favored ginkgo (SMD -0.58, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.01) and daily living did not differ significantly (SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.66 to 0.03) [2]. A 2014 meta-analysis of 9 trials (2,561 patients, 22 to 26 weeks) reported cognition (WMD -2.86) and daily living (SMD -0.36) favored EGb 761, mainly at 240 mg a day [3]. A 2026 Cochrane review of 13 placebo-controlled dementia trials (3,288 participants) found cognition at 6 months may be better on ginkgo (MD -1.86 on the Syndrom-Kurztest, 95% CI -3.48 to -0.24, 9 studies, 2,801 participants) and daily living slightly better (MD -0.19, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.03, 8 studies), both at low certainty [4].
- Population
- People with Alzheimer's, vascular or mixed dementia, or cognitive impairment [1][2][3][4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The reviews disagree. Heterogeneity was high [2], with I² of 91% to 96% for cognition and daily living in [4]. Only 4 of 82 studies in [4] were at low risk of bias in all domains. The Cochrane authors note many early trials were small, used unsatisfactory methods, and publication bias cannot be excluded [1]. Most trials tested one branded extract, EGb 761 [1][2][3].
Schizophrenia symptoms
Mixed results: a meta-analysis found lower symptoms with glycine added to antipsychotics, while the largest single trial found no effect on negative symptoms.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 29 trials (1,253 cases) of NMDA receptor modulators added to antipsychotics, glycine reduced total symptoms (SMD -0.66). Added to non-clozapine antipsychotics, glycine reduced positive symptoms (SMD -0.54) and total symptoms (SMD -1.12) [4]. In the 16-week CONSIST trial of 157 patients with moderate to severe negative symptoms, glycine did not differ from placebo on negative symptom scores or cognition [5].
- Population
- Adults with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder [4][5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The meta-analysis notes small subgroup sizes [4]. The two sources disagree. CONSIST is the largest single glycine trial and found no general effect [5].
Stroke
Mixed results: 68 pooled cohorts found no clear link with ischemic stroke, and a meta-analysis tied higher HDL cholesterol to slightly more bleeding in the brain.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The adjusted hazard ratio for ischemic stroke was 0.93 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.02) per 15 mg/dL higher HDL cholesterol [8]. In a meta-analysis of prospective studies, the relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.98 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.19) for high against low HDL cholesterol and 1.11 (0.99 to 1.25) per 1 mmol/L higher. For intracerebral hemorrhage the pooled relative risk was 1.17 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.35) [19].
- Population
- 302,430 people in 68 prospective studies, with 2,534 ischemic strokes [8]. 1,430,141 participants in 23 prospective studies, with 7,960 hemorrhagic strokes [19].
- Sources
- [8], [19]
- Caveats
- Observational. Most intervals include no association [8][19].
Stroke in trials that lowered homocysteine
Mixed results: a Cochrane review found 10% fewer strokes with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins, while a pooled analysis of 8 trials found no significant effect.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review found a small reduction in stroke with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins against placebo (4.3% against 5.1%, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, 10 trials) [8]. An individual-data meta-analysis of 8 trials found a rate ratio for stroke of 0.96 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.06) [7]. In a Chinese trial in adults with hypertension, adding folic acid 0.8 mg to enalapril lowered first stroke (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.93) over a median 4.5 years, with no difference in heart attack or death from any cause [9].
- Population
- 44,224 participants in the 10 trials with stroke data [8]. 37,485 participants in 8 trials [7]. 20,702 adults with hypertension and no history of stroke or heart attack [9].
- Sources
- [8], [7], [9]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane authors calculate that about 143 people would need treatment with folic acid plus enalapril for 5.4 years to prevent 1 stroke, and note that this evidence came from one very large trial [8].
Cognitive decline and brain shrinkage in trials that lowered homocysteine
Mixed results: pooled trials found no effect of homocysteine-lowering B vitamins on cognitive function, while one trial in mild cognitive impairment found slower brain shrinkage.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 11 trials, B vitamins lowered homocysteine by 26% to 28% and had no significant effect on individual cognitive domains or on global cognitive function (z score difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02). The authors calculate that a 25% reduction in homocysteine equated to 0.02 years of cognitive aging per year (95% CI -0.10 to 0.13) [12]. In a 2-year trial in people over 70 with mild cognitive impairment, the yearly rate of brain atrophy was 0.76% (95% CI 0.63 to 0.90) with folic acid, vitamin B12 and vitamin B6 and 1.08% (95% CI 0.94 to 1.22) with placebo. Among participants whose homocysteine was above 13 µmol/L, the rate was 53% lower with treatment [13].
- Population
- 22,000 participants in 11 trials, treated for a mean of 2.3 to 5 years [12]. 271 people randomized, 168 of whom completed the brain scans [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- The single trial measured brain volume on scans as its main outcome, in one center [13]. In 7 of the 11 pooled trials, cognitive tests were available only at the end of treatment [12].
Persistent post-concussion symptoms
Mixed results: three sham-controlled military trials found no benefit over sham compression, while a review that counted other control designs reported improvement at 1.5 ATA.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 72 service members, a clinically significant symptom improvement occurred in 52% with 40 hyperbaric oxygen sessions at 1.5 ATA, 33% with sham air sessions and 25% with usual care alone (P = .24). Both chamber groups improved more than usual care, and oxygen did not differ from sham (P = .70) [2]. In 50 service members, 30 sessions at 2.4 ATA produced no difference from sham on symptom or PTSD scores [3]. In 60 service members, 40 sessions at oxygen doses equal to 1.5 or 2.0 ATA produced no difference from sham [4]. A pooled analysis of 254 participants in four Department of Defense studies found non-significant trends on symptoms (Rivermead total -2.3, 95% CI -5.6 to 1.0) and a gain in verbal memory (3.8 points, 95% CI 1.0 to 6.7) [5]. A systematic review of 11 studies concluded that 40 sessions at 1.5 ATA produced symptom or cognitive improvements in four randomized trials [6].
- Population
- US military service members with symptoms at least months after mild traumatic brain injury [2][3][4][5]. Adults in 6 randomized trials and 5 smaller reports, all with fewer than 75 participants [6].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- The disagreement turns on what counts as a control. Sham sessions used pressurized air at 1.2 to 1.3 ATA, which the favorable review treats as an active dose [6]. The authors of the largest trial concluded the improvements were not oxygen mediated and may reflect placebo effects [2]. The favorable review has a single author.
Anxiety symptoms
Mixed results: a Cochrane review found anxiety scores fell 5 points more than placebo, while a later 4-week trial found no added drop.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 11 trials (645 participants), 6 studies pooled on the Hamilton Anxiety scale showed a 5.0-point greater reduction with kava extract than placebo (95% CI 1.1 to 8.8, n 345) [1]. In an internet-based trial of 391 adults with anxiety and insomnia, anxiety scores fell 14.4 points on placebo, and the drop on kava was 2.7 points smaller (95% CI -0.8 to 6.2) [2].
- Population
- Adults with anxiety in trials of 1 to 24 weeks [1]. 391 US adults over 4 weeks [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane trials were short, and the review sought data from kava manufacturers [1]. The two sources differ in direction.
Racemic ketamine against esketamine
Mixed results: two meta-analyses found larger effects for intravenous racemic ketamine than intranasal esketamine, but only by comparing separate trials, not head to head.
Compared with each other, indirectly, across trials against placebo [2][3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Racemic ketamine had larger pooled response (RR 3.01 vs 1.38) and remission ratios (RR 3.70 vs 1.47) and fewer dropouts [3]. Effect sizes were numerically larger for racemic ketamine at first dose, during repeated dosing and at follow-up [2].
- Population
- 1,877 participants in 24 trials [3]; 3,299 in 49 trials [2].
- Sources
- [3], [2]
- Caveats
- No trial compared the two directly. Racemic trials were mostly single-dose and smaller, and routes differ.
Depression without bipolar disorder
Mixed results: a 2025 meta-analysis with unpublished trials found no benefit over placebo in unipolar depression, while an earlier one pooled it with bipolar depression and found a small gain.
Compared with placebo, alone or added to an antidepressant [3][6]; lithium [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- With three unpublished studies included, lamotrigine did not beat placebo in unipolar depression, either alone or added to other treatment. No maintenance trials in unipolar depression were found [3]. An earlier meta-analysis found no difference in effect between unipolar and bipolar patients and pooled them, finding lower depression scores than placebo (SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.02) [6].
- Population
- 24 trials, the unipolar ones including three unpublished [3]; 4 studies with 187 people with unipolar depression within 18 studies [6].
- Sources
- [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The earlier analysis had few unipolar participants and did not report a unipolar estimate on its own [6]. Lamotrigine is not approved for depression.
Migraine prevention
Mixed results: a Cochrane review found lamotrigine no better than placebo for migraine frequency, while a network meta-analysis listed it among drugs with fewer than three positive trials.
Compared with placebo [10][11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In placebo-controlled trials, lamotrigine did not lower headache frequency per 28 days and did not raise the share of responders [10]. A network meta-analysis of migraine preventive drugs listed lamotrigine among drugs that beat placebo in fewer than three trials, without giving its effect size in the abstract [11].
- Population
- Adults with episodic migraine in 10 trials of nine seizure drugs, lamotrigine among them [10]; adults in randomized trials of migraine preventive drugs [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Few lamotrigine trials exist, and neither abstract gives their number or size.
Bleeding stroke at low levels
Mixed results: one cohort linked LDL cholesterol below 70 mg/dL to more bleeding strokes, while pooled trials lowering it to very low levels found no increase.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a cohort with repeated LDL cholesterol measurements, people averaging below 70 mg/dL had more intracerebral hemorrhage than those at 70 to 99 mg/dL: adjusted HR 1.65 (95% CI 1.32 to 2.05) at 50 to 69 mg/dL and 2.69 (2.03 to 3.57) below 50 mg/dL. Risk at 100 mg/dL or above was similar to that at 70 to 99 [16]. In a meta-analysis of trials in populations starting at a median of 70 mg/dL or less and reaching a median as low as 21 mg/dL, LDL lowering was not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke [14]. Statin trials found no significant effect on deaths due to stroke (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.09) [12].
- Population
- 96,043 adults, mean age 51, free of stroke, heart attack and cancer at baseline, 753 hemorrhages over 9 years [16]. 50,627 patients in 3 trials of non-statin drugs plus a statin trial subgroup [14].
- Sources
- [16], [14], [12]
- Caveats
- The cohort is observational and cannot show that low LDL cholesterol caused the hemorrhages. The trials ran for a few years, so they say little about decades at very low levels.
Blue-light filtering glasses in the evening
Mixed results: three reviews of blue-light filtering glasses found sleep improved in some trials and not others, with no change in objectively measured sleep against clear lenses.
Compared with non-blue-light filtering lenses [4]; visually identical clear-lens glasses worn at the same time [5]; control conditions the abstract does not describe [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Six trials gave inconsistent findings on sleep quality, three showing improvement and three no difference, with very low certainty of evidence [4]. In three double-blind crossover trials, the glasses did not change time to fall asleep (-4.86 minutes, 95% CI -20.23 to 10.52), total sleep time (8.75 minutes, 95% CI -35.31 to 52.82), sleep efficiency or wake after sleep onset, measured by wrist actigraphy [5]. A review of 16 randomized trials and other reports found substantial evidence of shorter time to fall asleep in people with sleep disorders, jet lag or variable shift schedules [6].
- Population
- 148 participants in 6 trials of sleep, within 17 trials overall [4]. 49 adults in 3 crossover trials [5]. 453 patients in 16 randomized trials, plus uncontrolled studies and case reports [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Trials were small and short, and most were at high risk of bias [4]. The positive review was not a meta-analysis and included uncontrolled studies [6]. Populations ranged from healthy adults to people with insomnia, mania and depression.
Stress and distress, against other active programs
Mixed results: against time-matched control programs, pooled trials found less depression and no difference in anxiety or distress. Against specific active programs, no difference was found.
Compared with nonspecific active control programs [1]; specific active programs such as exercise or other psychological programs [1]; drugs, exercise and other behavioral therapies [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against nonspecific active control conditions, mindfulness programs improved depression (SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.10, 6 trials), with no statistically significant evidence for anxiety or distress and no reliable data on well-being. Against specific active control conditions there was no statistically significant evidence of superiority [1]. A review of 47 trials limited to active controls found no evidence that meditation programs were better than any active treatment, including drugs, exercise and other behavioral therapies [3].
- Population
- Adults in nonclinical settings in 136 trials [1]. 3,515 participants with a range of clinical conditions in 47 trials [3].
- Sources
- [1], [3]
- Caveats
- Few trials made each active comparison, so a small difference could be missed [1]. "No better than" an active treatment can mean equal to it, which is how the review reads it [3].
Anxiety
Mixed results: mirtazapine matched SSRIs and benzodiazepines for generalized anxiety in small trials, with no placebo comparison among the pooled results.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 37 studies, mirtazapine did not differ from SSRIs in generalized anxiety disorder (SMD -0.14, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.09) or from benzodiazepines (SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.77). In people with major depression, it reduced anxiety symptoms slightly more than SSRIs (SMD -0.16) [10]. Before surgery it reduced anxiety against placebo or ondansetron (SMD -1.4, 95% CI -2.56 to -0.23) [8].
- Population
- 330 participants in 5 comparisons with SSRIs and 233 in 4 with benzodiazepines in generalized anxiety disorder, and 1,732 in 10 comparisons in depression [10].
- Sources
- [10], [8]
- Caveats
- Not an approved use. Matching another drug is not the same as beating placebo, and heterogeneity was high in the benzodiazepine comparison (I² 85.9%).
Fatigue in neurological conditions
Mixed results: one review found less fatigue in multiple sclerosis, and an earlier review found benefit only after brain injury and not in multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's.
Compared with placebo [13][14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 10 trials, modafinil lowered fatigue after traumatic brain injury (MD -0.82, 95% CI -1.54 to -0.11) and sleepiness in Parkinson's disease (MD -2.45 on the Epworth scale), but fatigue did not differ from placebo in pooled Parkinson's or multiple sclerosis studies [13]. A later review of 7 studies in multiple sclerosis found lower Modified Fatigue Impact Scale scores (MD -4.42, 95% CI -8.01 to -0.84) and more adverse events (RR 1.30) [14].
- Population
- 535 patients with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, brain injury or post-polio syndrome in 10 trials [13]; 7 controlled studies in multiple sclerosis [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Most trials were small [13]. The two reviews disagree on multiple sclerosis, and neither studied fatigue in people without a diagnosed condition.
ADHD
Mixed results: in a network meta-analysis, modafinil reduced ADHD symptoms in children on clinician and teacher ratings but did not differ from placebo in adults.
Compared with placebo, and other ADHD drugs in a network analysis [17]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In children and adolescents, every drug in the analysis, modafinil included, beat placebo on clinician ratings, and modafinil was one of two drugs that beat placebo on teacher ratings (SMD -0.76, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.37). In adults, modafinil did not differ from placebo (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.59) and was less well tolerated than placebo (OR 4.01). Amphetamines outperformed modafinil head to head [17].
- Population
- 133 double-blind trials in children, adolescents and adults with ADHD [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- Most comparisons were indirect and rated low or very low confidence [17]. Modafinil is not FDA-approved for ADHD.
Spasticity in multiple sclerosis
Mixed results: one review found fair evidence that baclofen and tizanidine reduce spasticity against placebo, and a Cochrane review called the evidence in multiple sclerosis poorly documented.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 101 randomized trials found fair evidence that baclofen and tizanidine reduce spasticity against placebo, mainly in multiple sclerosis, and that the two are roughly equivalent, with more dry mouth on tizanidine and more weakness on baclofen. None of the trials met its top quality rating [4]. A Cochrane review of 26 placebo-controlled and 13 comparative studies in multiple sclerosis found that of the 8 placebo-controlled trials using the Ashworth scale of muscle tone, 3 showed a significant difference, and that spasms and function were assessed with unvalidated scores [8].
- Population
- People with spasticity, mostly from multiple sclerosis, in 101 randomized trials of muscle relaxants [4]; people with multiple sclerosis in 39 studies of anti-spasticity drugs [8].
- Sources
- [4], [8]
- Caveats
- Both reviews date from 2003 and 2004. Neither pooled an effect size.
Headache, irritable bowel syndrome and other conditions
Mixed results: an overview of 27 reviews found possible relief in migraine and irritable bowel syndrome, and no relief in acute low back pain, fibromyalgia or other headaches.
Compared with no treatment, sham treatment or other non-osteopathic treatment [16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Osteopathic treatment may relieve symptoms in adults with migraine and irritable bowel syndrome. It did not appear to relieve acute nonspecific low back pain, fibromyalgia, headaches of various causes, lower urinary tract symptoms in women, or cerebral palsy in children. Evidence for vertigo, COPD, high blood pressure and gynecological complaints was insufficient [16]. An earlier overview rated the evidence for children's conditions, headache and irritable bowel syndrome limited and inconclusive [17].
- Population
- 27 systematic reviews covering nine indications [16]. 9 reviews with 55 trials and 3,740 participants [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Included reviews were rated low or critically low in quality [17], and the trials were heterogeneous and partly of poor quality [16].
Loneliness
Mixed results: a review linked pets to less social isolation but not clearly to less loneliness before COVID-19. One small study found loneliness fell after getting a dog.
Compared with people without pets [8]; people who delayed getting a dog and people with no plans to get one [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In adults, pet ownership was linked to lower social isolation. Studies of loneliness found no overall significant link before COVID-19, and mostly lower loneliness after it. In children and adolescents, pets were linked to less loneliness. Most studies found no difference between dogs, cats and other pets [8]. After getting a dog, UCLA Loneliness Scale scores fell 8.41 points (95% CI -16.57 to -0.26) at 3 months and 7.12 points (95% CI -12.55 to -1.69) at 8 months, on a 0 to 60 scale [9].
- Population
- 24 observational studies [8]. 71 Australian adults, 17 of whom got a dog [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Only part of the reviewed studies found a link [8]. The controlled study was small, groups were self-selected, and positive and negative mood did not change in dog owners [9].
Dementia
Mixed results: one meta-analysis linked activity to 20% less dementia even with long follow-up, while another found no link once activity was measured 10 or more years before diagnosis.
Compared with people with lower activity, as each study defined it [16]; physically inactive participants [17]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Activity was linked to lower all-cause dementia (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.84) and Alzheimer's disease (RR 0.86), including in follow-ups of 20 years or more [16]. Inactivity measured under 10 years before diagnosis was linked to more dementia (HR 1.40). Measured 10 or more years before, it was not (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.14) [17].
- Population
- 257,983 adults for all-cause dementia in 58 studies [16]. 404,840 people, mean age 45.5, in 19 cohorts with 2,044 dementia cases [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Dementia develops for years before diagnosis and lowers activity in that time, so reverse causation is a strong candidate [17]. There were signs of publication bias [16].
Depression symptoms
Mixed results: one meta-analysis of 11 trials found lower depression scores, and another found sham-controlled trials in major depression showed no significant advantage.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 11 randomized trials, photobiomodulation lowered depression scores (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.35), with light applied to the body outperforming light applied to the head [24]. A meta-analysis of transcranial light found an effect across 8 studies regardless of diagnosis (Hedges' g 1.415), and no significant superiority over sham in the 3 double-blind trials in major depressive disorder (g 0.499, p = 0.211) [25].
- Population
- People with depression symptoms in 11 trials [24]. 8 studies, 3 of them sham-controlled trials in major depressive disorder [25].
- Sources
- [24], [25]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality was rated moderate to very low [24]. The second review describes its own conclusion as weak support and notes likely sample size bias [25].
Anxiety, stress and depression, compared with sham Reiki by untrained people
Mixed results: a review of 14 sham-controlled trials found Reiki ahead of sham on some mental health symptoms, and a chemotherapy trial found comfort rose equally with sham.
Compared with sham Reiki, usually given by an untrained person taught to copy the Reiki practitioner's hand positions [2]; a sham Reiki placebo, and standard care [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 14 trials with a placebo-Reiki group, Reiki showed a greater effect than placebo for some mental health symptoms. The reviewers rated the evidence high for clinically relevant stress and depression, moderate to high for clinically relevant anxiety, and low for anxiety and depression at normal levels [2]. In 189 people having chemotherapy, comfort and well-being rose after Reiki and also after sham Reiki, and did not change with standard care [3].
- Population
- 14 randomized placebo-controlled trials in adults [2]. 189 adults at an outpatient chemotherapy center [3].
- Sources
- [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The reviewers found few trials in each area and called the findings inconclusive, with most trials at some risk of bias [2]. The chemotherapy authors attributed the gain to one-on-one presence of a nurse [3].
Mood after cutting social media
Mixed results: one meta-analysis found small gains in well-being from social media breaks, another found none, and breaks shorter than a week went with worse mood.
Compared with control groups the abstract does not describe [1]; control groups in randomized trials [2]; control conditions in experimental studies of social media use [3]; people who kept using social media as usual [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 10 studies, social media abstinence did not change positive affect, negative affect or life satisfaction, and longer breaks did not change this [1]. Across 20 randomized trials, social media breaks had a small positive effect on well-being, and break length changed the effect on negative indicators [2]. A reanalysis of 20 reduction or abstinence studies, drawn from a meta-analysis of 27, found breaks under 1 week went with worse mental health (d -0.175) and breaks of 1 week or longer with better (d 0.156) [3]. In one trial, a 1-week break raised well-being (mean difference 4.9, 95% CI 3.0 to 6.8) and lowered depression (-2.2) and anxiety (-1.7) scores [4].
- Population
- 4,674 participants in 10 studies [1]. 20 randomized trials [2]. 20 experimental studies [3]. 154 adults, mean age 29.6 [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Participants know whether they are on a break, and most studies lasted days to weeks. The reviews differ in which studies they included [1][2].
Bright light, naps and other measures for sleepiness on shift
Mixed results: in a Cochrane review, bright light at night lowered sleepiness slightly in two studies, while naps, exercise and sleep education gave inconclusive results.
Compared with normal light [2]; control conditions the review abstract does not describe, for naps and other measures [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Bright light during the night shift lowered sleepiness by 0.83 points on the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (95% CI -1.3 to -0.36, very low-quality evidence). Another trial found no difference on another scale, and bright light during day shifts did not reduce sleepiness. A single nap opportunity changed reaction time by 11.87 ms, not significant. Exercise and sleep education showed promise without enough data to judge [2].
- Population
- 556 shift workers who also work nights, in 17 randomized trials [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- Most comparisons gave low to very low-quality evidence and studies were too varied to pool [2].
Total sleep time, Fitbit wristband models pooled
Mixed results: early Fitbit models without sleep staging overestimated total sleep time by 7 to 67 minutes, while sleep-staging models did not differ significantly from polysomnography.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Fitbit wristband models, pooled as early models without sleep staging and later sleep-staging models
- Compared with
- Polysomnography
- Effect
- Fitbit models without sleep staging overestimated total sleep time (by about 7 to 67 minutes) and sleep efficiency (by about 2 to 15%) and underestimated wake after sleep onset (by about 6 to 44 minutes). They identified sleep epochs with sensitivity of 0.87 to 0.99 and specificity of 0.10 to 0.52. Sleep-staging models showed no significant difference from polysomnography in total sleep time (P = .29), wake after sleep onset (P = .25) or sleep efficiency (P = .19), underestimated sleep onset latency (P = .03), and had sensitivity of 0.95 to 0.96 and specificity of 0.58 to 0.69 [8].
- Population
- 22 articles in the systematic review, 8 of them in the meta-analysis [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- The review was published in 2019 and covers Fitbit models released before then. Its authors concluded the devices are of limited specificity and are not a substitute for polysomnography [8].
Depression in children and teenagers
Mixed results: fluoxetine alone separated from placebo in one network meta-analysis, and a Cochrane review called the symptom reductions small and unimportant.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among 14 antidepressants, only fluoxetine reduced depression symptoms more than placebo (SMD -0.51, 95% CrI -0.99 to -0.03) [22]. On a scale running from 17 to 113, a Cochrane network meta-analysis found reductions against placebo of 2.84 points for fluoxetine (95% CI 1.56 to 4.12) and 3.51 for sertraline (95% CI 0.04 to 6.99). Escitalopram (-2.62, 95% CI -5.29 to 0.04) and paroxetine (-1.43, 95% CI -3.90 to 1.04) did not clearly differ from placebo. The review described these reductions as small and unimportant [23].
- Population
- 5,260 children and adolescents in 34 trials [22]; 26 studies in children and adolescents [23].
- Sources
- [22], [23]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality was very low for most comparisons [22]. Most trials excluded young people at risk of self-harm, and intervals for suicide-related outcomes were wide [23]. See the boxed warning under Risks.
Differences between SSRIs
Mixed results: head-to-head depression trials placed escitalopram and paroxetine among the higher response rates and fluoxetine among the lower, with small gaps once all trials were pooled.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In head-to-head depression trials, escitalopram and paroxetine were among the drugs with higher response rates than other antidepressants (odds ratios 1.19 to 1.96), and fluoxetine was among those with lower rates (0.51 to 0.84). Citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine and sertraline had fewer dropouts than other antidepressants (odds ratios 0.43 to 0.77). When placebo-controlled trials were added, the differences between drugs shrank [1]. In OCD, the effects of individual SSRIs were similar and did not differ statistically [5]. Across anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and stress disorders, pairwise comparisons showed only small differences between drugs [9].
- Population
- 116,477 adults with depression in 522 trials [1]; 3,097 adults with OCD [5]; 30,245 participants in 135 studies [9].
- Sources
- [1], [5], [9]
- Caveats
- Credible intervals were wide on most comparisons between drugs, and the certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low [1].
Major depression against placebo
Mixed results: a review of 29 trials found more responses than placebo in major depression, while a US trial found no difference, with sertraline also no different.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 29 trials (5,489 patients), response rates against placebo had a rate ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.49) in 9 larger trials and 1.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.87) in 9 smaller ones [1]. In a 2002 US trial of 340 outpatients with a Hamilton score of at least 20, the 8-week drop in score was 8.68 points on St. John's wort and 9.20 on placebo, and full response was 23.9% against 31.9%. Sertraline did not differ from placebo on these measures either [2].
- Population
- Adults with major depression [1][2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Placebo-controlled results were markedly heterogeneous, and trials from German-speaking countries reported more favorable results [1]. The US trial was funded by the NIMH, and its authors raise low assay sensitivity [2].
Quitting smoking
Mixed results: topiramate raised quit rates at 4 to 12 weeks against placebo, but prolonged abstinence did not differ in a meta-analysis of five trials.
Compared with placebo [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Prolonged abstinence did not differ from placebo (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.5). Abstinence at single time points was higher at weeks 4, 6, 8 and 12, with an OR of 2.45 (95% CI 1.37 to 4.39) at week 12 [11].
- Population
- Smokers in 5 trials [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Few trials, and publication bias could not be excluded [11].
Memory and thinking
Mixed results: one review found better overall thinking in older adults and longer trials, while another found no change in overall cognition.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 9 RCTs (501 participants), curcumin improved global cognitive function against placebo (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.45). The effect was significant only in trials of 24 weeks or more, in participants aged 60 or older, or in Asian participants [38]. Another meta-analysis of 10 human studies (531 participants) found no effect on global cognition (SMD 0.14, 95% CI -0.78 to 1.07), with gains in working memory (SMD 1.01) and processing speed (SMD 0.37) in subgroups [39].
- Population
- Adults in RCTs, many older [38][39].
- Sources
- [38], [39]
- Caveats
- The two reviews disagree on global cognition. Domain gains come from subgroup analyses [39].
Child IQ and reading when iodine was low in pregnancy
Mixed results: one UK cohort linked low iodine in early pregnancy to lower child verbal IQ, a pooled analysis found a weaker link, and one supplement trial found no effect.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a UK cohort, children of women whose first-trimester urinary iodine to creatinine ratio was below 150 µg/g were more likely to score in the lowest quarter for verbal IQ at age 8 (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.30) and for reading accuracy at age 9 (OR 1.69, 1.15 to 2.49) than children of women at 150 µg/g or above. The group's median urinary iodine concentration was 91.1 µg/L [4]. A pooled analysis of three European birth cohorts found that a ratio below 150 µg/g was not significantly associated with nonverbal IQ (difference -0.6 points, 95% CI -1.7 to 0.4) or verbal IQ (-0.6 points, -1.3 to 0.1). It found a curved relation with verbal IQ that was present only up to 14 weeks of pregnancy [5]. In a randomized trial in India and Thailand, 200 µg of iodine a day from about 11 weeks of pregnancy did not change children's verbal IQ at age 5 to 6 (89.5 against 90.2 on placebo, difference -0.7, 95% CI -2.9 to 1.5), performance IQ or executive function [6].
- Population
- 1,040 mother and child pairs in the United Kingdom [4]. 6,180 mother and child pairs in the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom [5]. 832 pregnant women with a median urinary iodine of 131 µg/L, and 313 to 315 of their children at follow-up [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- The cohort studies are observational and measured iodine as a ratio to creatinine in µg/g, a different quantity from the concentration on this page. The trial enrolled women with mild deficiency and followed fewer than half of the children to age 5 to 6. All of these studies compared groups of women. None tested acting on one woman's urine result.
Stroke and heart attack
Mixed results: stroke was slightly lower, 4.3% against 5.1%, with B vitamins mostly combined with folic acid, while heart attack and death did not change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 15 RCTs with 71,422 participants, homocysteine-lowering B vitamins (B6, folic acid or B12, alone or combined) did not change heart attack (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.10) or death from any cause (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06). Stroke was lower: 4.3% against 5.1% (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, 10 trials, 44,224 people) [8].
- Population
- Adults with and without existing cardiovascular disease, followed 1 to 7.3 years. People with end-stage kidney disease were excluded [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Most trials combined B12 with folic acid, so the stroke result cannot be assigned to B12 alone. The authors rated the stroke evidence high quality [8].
Cognitive decline in older adults
Mixed results: cohort and survey data linked low B12 status to faster cognitive decline, while pooled trials of B vitamins found no effect on cognitive function.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an Oxford cohort followed for 10 years, holotranscobalamin, methylmalonic acid and homocysteine predicted cognitive decline and folate did not. A doubling of holotranscobalamin from 50 to 100 pmol/L went with a 30% slower rate of decline, and a doubling of methylmalonic acid from 0.25 to 0.50 µmol/L with a decline more than 50% faster [6]. In a US survey of older adults, low B12 status (serum B12 below 148 pmol/L or methylmalonic acid above 210 nmol/L) was associated with cognitive impairment (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.8) [7]. In a meta-analysis of 11 trials, B vitamins lowered homocysteine by 26% to 28% and had no significant effect on global cognitive function (z score difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02) or on individual cognitive domains [8].
- Population
- 1,648 older adults in Oxford, United Kingdom, tested on 3 or more occasions over 10 years [6]. 1,459 senior participants in the 1999 to 2002 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [7]. 22,000 participants in 11 trials, with treatment lasting a mean of 2.3 to 5 years [8].
- Sources
- [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The cohort and survey findings are observational, and the survey measured status and cognition at one point in time. The trials tested B vitamins given to lower homocysteine and were not trials of treating B12 deficiency [8].
Multiple sclerosis
Mixed results: a Cochrane review found no change in relapses or disability in MS, while later analyses found modest drops in relapse and disability.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of 12 RCTs (933 participants) found vitamin D3 did not change annualized relapse rate (rate difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.07), disability scores (EDSS MD -0.25, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.10) or MRI lesions at 52 weeks, from very low-quality evidence [33]. A later meta-analysis of 21 studies (1,903 patients) found lower EDSS (MD -0.17), fewer patients relapsing (OR 0.66) and fewer new T2 lesions, and no change in annualized relapse rate, fatigue or quality of life [34]. A network meta-analysis of 32 RCTs (2,254 patients) found lower relapse risk (RR 0.80) and EDSS (MD -0.22) with long-term supplementation [35]. In 316 people with a first episode typical of MS, 100,000 IU every 2 weeks for 24 months lowered disease activity (60.3% against 74.1%, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.87), driven by MRI findings. Relapse did not differ (17.9% against 21.8%, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.16) [36].
- Population
- Adults with MS, mostly on standard treatment [33][34][35]. Untreated adults with clinically isolated syndrome in France [36].
- Sources
- [33], [34], [35], [36]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane review and the later analyses disagree. The later analyses include more and newer trials, and their authors describe the effects as modest [34].
Mood and depression in volunteers
Mixed results: cohorts linked volunteering to slightly less depression and more wellbeing, but randomized trials reviewed in 2013 did not confirm these benefits.
Compared with non-volunteers, in cohorts and trials [2]; non-volunteers [3]; people who volunteered 0 hours a year [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Cohort studies showed favorable effects on depression, life satisfaction and wellbeing, and experimental studies did not confirm them [2]. In people 65 and older, three studies gave a small effect on depression (SMD 0.12, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.23) [3]. Volunteering 100 hours or more a year was linked to more positive affect, optimism and purpose, and fewer depressive symptoms, less hopelessness and less loneliness, but not to less diagnosed depression or negative affect [4].
- Population
- 40 papers, 5 randomized trials and 17 cohort studies [2]. 3 studies of adults 65 and older [3]. 12,998 US adults over 50 [4].
- Sources
- [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The pooled effect sat at the edge of no difference [3]. Mood was self-reported, and the trials were few and small [2].
Total sleep time and waking in the night
Mixed results: one meta-analysis found a month of zolpidem lengthened total sleep, while pooled FDA trial data found no significant change in sleep time or awakenings.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In the FDA trial data, waking after sleep onset, number of awakenings, total sleep time and sleep efficiency did not differ significantly from placebo, and the authors said too few studies reported these outcomes for firm conclusions [1]. One month of zolpidem increased total sleep time against placebo, with no significant difference in waking after sleep onset [2]. In adults aged 60 and older, eszopiclone added 26.69 minutes of measured total sleep time against placebo [3]. Across sedative hypnotics of all kinds in people aged 60 and over, total sleep time rose by a mean of 25.2 minutes and night awakenings fell by 0.63 [5]. The zaleplon label states it has not been shown to increase total sleep time or decrease the number of awakenings [6]. The eszopiclone label reports that 3 mg reduced waking after sleep onset against placebo in adults [7].
- Population
- 4,378 participants in 13 trials [1]; 1,068 patients in 6 trials [2]; 5,917 older adults in 24 articles [3]; 2,417 participants aged 60 or over in 24 studies [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [5], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- [5] pooled benzodiazepines with zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone and does not report the newer drugs alone. Results differ by drug: the evidence for longer sleep is for eszopiclone and zolpidem, not zaleplon.
Insomnia
Limited evidence: small, biased trials found more people sleeping better with acupressure or added acupuncture, and the effect became uncertain when dropouts were counted as failures.
Compared with no treatment [17]; sham or placebo [17]; other treatment alone [17]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Acupressure improved sleep quality in more people than no treatment (OR 13.08, 95% CI 1.79 to 95.59, 2 trials) or sham (OR 6.62, 95% CI 1.78 to 24.55, 2 trials). Acupuncture added to other treatment raised the share with better sleep (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.93 to 4.90, 13 trials, 883 participants), with needle acupuncture and not electroacupuncture showing a benefit. When dropouts were assumed to do worse, the benefit was inconclusive [17].
- Population
- 33 trials with 2,293 people aged 15 to 98 with insomnia [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- All trials were at high risk of bias, and publication bias was likely. The reviewers wrote that the evidence could neither support nor refute acupuncture for insomnia [17].
Sleep (diphenhydramine)
Small trials found diphenhydramine gave modest sleep gains in mild insomnia, such as better sleep efficiency or fewer awakenings, with no change on overnight sleep recordings.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In adults with mild insomnia, diphenhydramine 50 mg raised diary sleep efficiency more than placebo and showed a trend toward longer sleep in the first 14 days, with lower insomnia severity ratings. Polysomnography showed no difference in sleep continuity, and no rebound insomnia followed stopping [8]. In older adults, diphenhydramine 50 mg reduced only the number of awakenings (1.7 against 2.0 a night) compared with placebo [9]. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine suggested clinicians not use diphenhydramine for sleep onset or maintenance insomnia [10].
- Population
- 184 adults, mean age 44, over 14 days [8]; older adults with insomnia, mean age 73.9, in a 14-night crossover trial [9]; guideline review of trials [10].
- Sources
- [8], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Few small trials. Many sleep-aid products combine diphenhydramine with other drugs.
Infant brain development (supplements in pregnancy)
Small trials found opposite results: higher maternal choline sped infant reaction times in one, while a larger trial found no change in development. A review called the evidence insufficient.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Sources disagree. In a controlled feeding study, infants of mothers eating 930 mg of choline a day in the third trimester had faster mean reaction times at 4 to 13 months than infants of mothers eating 480 mg [1]. In a larger trial, 750 mg of phosphatidylcholine a day from 18 weeks through 90 days after birth did not change infant memory, language or global development at 10 and 12 months [2]. A systematic review of 4 randomized trials and 5 observational studies found that most neurodevelopmental outcomes did not support a benefit, and judged the evidence insufficient to support or refute one [3].
- Population
- 26 women, 24 infants tested [1]; 140 women, 99 infants tested [2]. Trials and cohorts reported across 20 publications [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Women in [2] ate about 360 mg of choline a day from food. The feeding study had no placebo group and compared two intakes [1]. Each trial tested many outcomes, and the review found critical limitations across the evidence [3].
Insomnia, compared with sleep medication
Limited evidence: five trials suggested CBT for insomnia outlasts sleep drugs in the long term, while benzodiazepines gave better short-term results.
Compared with benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine sleep drugs [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Low to moderate-grade evidence suggested CBT for insomnia gave better long-term results than benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine drugs. Very low-grade evidence suggested benzodiazepines gave better short-term results [11].
- Population
- Adults with primary or comorbid insomnia in 5 trials [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Only 5 trials, with evidence graded low to very low [11].
Mood
Mixed results: a systematic review of randomized trials found no improvement in mood, while small single-session studies without control groups reported less negative feeling afterward.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 11 randomized trials reported improvements in sleep quality and quality of life, but not mood [14]. In 16 adults, positive affect did not change after 15 minutes at 10°C, and negative affect was lower at 180 minutes (p < 0.001) [15]. In 33 adults, a 5-minute immersion was followed by feeling more active, alert, attentive, proud and inspired, and less distressed and nervous [19]. Among 722 outdoor swimmers surveyed, a positive impact on mental health conditions was 44.32 times more probable than no impact [20].
- Population
- Healthy adults in 11 trials [14]. 16 healthy adults [15]. 33 adults aged 20 to 45 [19]. 722 self-selected outdoor swimmers [20].
- Sources
- [14], [15], [19], [20]
- Caveats
- The positive studies had no control condition, and participants chose to take part in a cold water study. The survey authors state it cannot show cause [20].
Depression
Limited evidence: a case report and a feasibility study in which 5 of 13 patients attended regularly describe improved well-being with cold water swimming. No controlled trial was located.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an open-label feasibility study of twice-weekly group cold water swimming added to usual depression treatment, 13 patients were recruited and 5 took part regularly. Their well-being score rose from 39.2 to 54.0 [21]. A case report describes a 24-year-old woman with major depressive disorder whose symptoms eased with weekly open water swimming and who was medication-free a year later [22].
- Population
- 13 outpatients with depression aged 20 to 69 [21]. One patient [22].
- Sources
- [21], [22]
- Caveats
- No control group, six people in total with outcome data, and swimming outdoors in a group adds exercise, nature and company to the cold.
Physical function and cognition
Small trials found mixed results: walking improved in an uncontrolled pulmonary fibrosis study, cognition did not change in Alzheimer disease, and quercetin results in older adults varied.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, six-minute walk distance, 4 m gait speed and chair-stand time improved significantly after 3 weeks of intermittent dosing [5]. In mild Alzheimer disease, cognitive and brain imaging outcomes did not differ from baseline after 12 weeks [6]. With quercetin alone, 26 older adults doing 6 weeks of resistance training on 200 mg a day of quercetin glycosides gained more knee extension force than on placebo (115.1% against 105.3% of baseline), with no change in muscle mass [7]. In 38 older adults, a single 500 mg dose before low or moderate intensity resistance exercise produced a larger drop in electrically elicited muscle torque afterward than placebo, and not at high intensity [8].
- Population
- 14 adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [5]; 5 adults with early Alzheimer disease, mean age 76 [6]; healthy older adults [7][8].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The dasatinib plus quercetin studies were open-label with no placebo group, built to test feasibility [5][6]. The two quercetin-only trials are small and from one research group [7][8].
Stress
Limited evidence: a review of 14 trials found limited support for stress outcomes, and most studies had authors from industry.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 14 placebo-controlled trials of natural or fermented GABA found limited evidence for stress outcomes [1]. In 63 adults, 100 mg of GABA 30 minutes before mental tasks reduced the task-related drop in alpha and beta brain waves compared with placebo, and mood scores matched this [2]. In 8 male university students who play esports, 200 mg of GABA before gameplay lowered confusion and fatigue mood scores and raised game task scores compared with placebo [3].
- Population
- Adults in trials of single doses to several weeks [1]. 28 men and 35 women in a single-blind crossover [2]. 8 men aged 20 to 24, crossover [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- No meta-analysis was possible because outcomes varied. In 11 of the 14 studies, one or more authors worked for an industrial company [1]. All authors of the esports trial are inventors on a related patent application filed with Pharma Foods International [3].
Sleep
Limited evidence: a review found very limited support for sleep. One trial found faster sleep onset on GABA than placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The same review found very limited evidence for sleep [1]. In a single-blind crossover trial, GABA shortened the time to fall asleep and increased non-REM sleep on EEG compared with placebo [4].
- Population
- Adults [1][4].
- Sources
- [1], [4]
- Caveats
- The abstract of [4] does not give participant numbers or effect sizes.
Nerve pain after spinal cord injury
Limited evidence: two trials behind pregabalin's approval found lower pain scores than placebo, while a Cochrane review judged the evidence in central nerve pain inadequate.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The pregabalin label describes two placebo-controlled trials in spinal cord injury pain. In the 12-week trial, 150 to 600 mg a day improved the weekly mean pain score and raised the share of people with at least 30% and 50% pain reduction [7]. A Cochrane review of pregabalin concluded that evidence of efficacy in central neuropathic pain was inadequate [2].
- Population
- Adults with spinal cord injury pain lasting at least three months, with a baseline pain score of 6.5 to 6.7 out of 10 [7].
- Sources
- [7], [2]
- Caveats
- The label text read here gives no effect sizes. The evidence is for pregabalin.
Nerve damage from chemotherapy (IV)
One trial found less nerve damage from oxaliplatin with IV glutathione. A larger review found no drop in all-grade neuropathy against placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After 8 cycles, grade 2 to 4 neuropathy occurred in 2 patients on glutathione and 11 on placebo (P = 0.003). After 12 cycles, it was 3 against 8 (P = 0.004). Tumor response did not fall (26.9% against 23.1%) [7]. A 2026 network meta-analysis of 25 RCTs (1,625 patients) of glutathione and glutathione boosters found no agent lowered all-grade neuropathy against placebo. Glutathione was associated with fewer grade 3 or 4 cases (OR 0.34, 95% CrI 0.13 to 0.79) [8].
- Population
- 52 people with advanced colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin, given 1,500 mg/m² IV before each dose [7]. 1,625 patients receiving chemotherapy in 25 RCTs [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The grade 3 or 4 association was not retained when the analysis was restricted to double-blind studies, and the authors call it preliminary [8].
Parkinson's disease
Limited evidence: intranasal glutathione raised brain glutathione modestly without improving Parkinson's symptoms.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2026 systematic review of 9 studies (196 participants) of N-acetylcysteine or glutathione in Parkinson's disease found intranasal glutathione gave modest increases in brain glutathione without significant improvement in symptoms or oxidative stress markers [9].
- Population
- People with Parkinson's disease in RCTs and non-randomized studies from 2009 to 2019 [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Small samples, short durations and varied doses and routes. The authors call the glutathione findings inconclusive [9].
Mood
Mixed results: one sham-controlled study of 40 adults found 1 hour grounded lifted mood, while a 12-week pilot found anxiety and depression did not differ from sham.
Compared with sham grounding [7][1]; weeks without grounding, in the same people [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a double-blind pilot, pleasant and positive mood improved after 1 hour of grounding in a recliner and did not improve with sham grounding [7]. Massage therapists reported less depressed mood while grounded [3]. In patients with mild Alzheimer's disease, Beck Anxiety and Beck Depression scores did not change significantly with grounding compared with sham [1].
- Population
- 40 adults [7]. 16 massage therapists [3]. 15 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease [1].
- Sources
- [7], [1], [3]
- Caveats
- Very small studies with short exposures. The 40-person study was by a researcher who has worked as a contractor for the sponsoring company [7][4].
Sleep
Small trials found mixed results for falling asleep, staying asleep and sleep quality on 25 to 100 mg of hydroxyzine at bedtime.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review found five studies, one open-label and four randomized, of hydroxyzine 25, 50 or 100 mg at bedtime. Results were mixed for sleep onset, sleep maintenance and sleep quality. Dry mouth was the most common adverse effect, and four of the five studies did not report safety outcomes [11].
- Population
- 207 adults in 5 studies [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Not an approved use. Small, short studies with no pooled estimate and no long-term data.
Long COVID
Mixed results: a 40-session sham-controlled trial found better cognition, energy and sleep scores in long COVID, and a 10-session trial found no difference from sham.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 73 patients with symptoms at least 3 months after infection, 40 daily sessions improved global cognitive function (d = 0.495, p = 0.038), attention, executive function, energy (d = 0.522), sleep, psychiatric symptoms and pain interference compared with sham [12]. In 80 patients, 10 sessions at 2.4 bar over 6 weeks did not differ from sham at 13 weeks in physical functioning (difference 0.63, 95% CI -7.04 to 8.29) or role limitations due to physical health (difference 2.35, 95% CI -5.95 to 10.66). Both groups improved [13].
- Population
- 73 adults, 37 treated and 36 sham [12]. 80 previously healthy adults aged 18 to 60, 40 per group [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- The trials differ fourfold in the number of sessions and in their outcome measures. Outcomes in the positive trial were assessed 1 to 3 weeks after the last session [12].
PTSD
Mixed results: one unblinded trial in 35 veterans found lower PTSD scores after 60 sessions, and pooled sham-controlled military data showed a trend that did not reach significance.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD, clinician-rated PTSD scores improved after 60 daily sessions and did not change in controls (net effect size 1.64, P < 0.0001), with gains in depression scores [14]. In pooled data from four sham-controlled Department of Defense studies of post-concussion symptoms, the PTSD Checklist score changed by -2.7 points (95% CI -5.8 to 0.4, p = 0.09) in favor of hyperbaric oxygen [5]. Two of those trials individually found no difference from sham on the same checklist [3][4].
- Population
- 35 veterans randomized, 29 completed, control group untreated [14]. 254 service members [5].
- Sources
- [14], [5], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The positive trial had no sham, and its participants knew their group [14]. The military trials enrolled people for post-concussion symptoms, not PTSD alone.
Depression
Mixed results: one sham-controlled trial found lower depression scores for 6 weeks after a single whole-body hyperthermia session, and a later trial found no advantage over sham.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 30 adults with major depressive disorder, a single session of whole-body hyperthermia lowered Hamilton depression scores against sham by 6.53 points at week 1 (95% CI -9.90 to -3.16) and 4.27 points at week 6 (95% CI -7.94 to -0.61) [16]. In 30 adults who all received cognitive behavioral therapy, Beck Depression Inventory scores fell 19.07 points with infrared hyperthermia and 21.10 points with sham [17]. A systematic review of 7 studies (148 people) found effect sizes of 0.8 or more on 19 of 21 endpoints [18]. In 28 mildly depressed inpatients, 20 far-infrared sessions improved somatic complaints, hunger and relaxation scores against no thermal therapy, and mental complaints only slightly (p = .054) [19].
- Population
- Medically healthy adults aged 18 to 65 with major depressive disorder, off psychotropic medication [16]. 30 adults with major depressive disorder [17]. 148 people in 7 studies, 4 using infrared heating and 3 hot baths [18]. 28 inpatients [19].
- Sources
- [16], [17], [18], [19]
- Caveats
- Whole-body hyperthermia is a supervised procedure that raises core temperature, not an ordinary sauna visit. After treatment, 93.8% of the heated group and 71.4% of the sham group believed they had received heat [16]. In the later trial every heated participant guessed correctly, and its authors judged the sham not fully credible [17]. Three of the 7 reviewed studies had no control group [18].
Generalized anxiety disorder
Small trials found mixed results: a 6-week trial found less anxiety than placebo, and a larger 16-week trial found no difference.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 58 analyzed participants with generalized anxiety disorder, 6 weeks of an aqueous extract (120 to 240 mg kavalactones a day) lowered anxiety more than placebo (Cohen d 0.62), and 26% against 6% were in remission [3]. In a 16-week phase III trial of 171 people with the same diagnosis, 120 mg of kavalactones twice a day did not differ from placebo (1.37 points favoring placebo, p 0.25), and remission was 17.4% on kava and 23.8% on placebo [4].
- Population
- Adults with generalized anxiety disorder in Australia [3][4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The two trials, from the same research group, disagree. The larger, longer trial was funded by Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council [4].
Sleep
Mixed results: one trial found better sleep quality on kava in people with anxiety-related sleep problems, while a larger internet trial found no relief of insomnia over placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 61 patients with sleep disturbances tied to anxiety, 200 mg a day of kava extract WS 1490 for 4 weeks improved self-rated sleep quality (p = 0.007) and feeling rested after sleep (p = 0.018) more than placebo, with no drug-related adverse events [8]. In 391 adults with anxiety and insomnia recruited online, neither kava nor valerian relieved anxiety or insomnia more than placebo over 28 days [2].
- Population
- 61 patients with anxiety-related sleep disturbances in a multicenter trial [8]. 391 adults with anxiety and insomnia in the US [2].
- Sources
- [8], [2]
- Caveats
- Both trials lasted 4 weeks and measured sleep by questionnaire. In the larger trial, the primary sleep comparison was for valerian, and the placebo group improved by 8.3 points on the insomnia index [2].
Anxiety disorders
Small trials found mixed results: ketamine raised response in social anxiety disorder, but not significantly in PTSD.
Compared with control infusions in randomized trials [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Four of six trials found anxiety scores fell more on ketamine than control. Response was more likely in social anxiety disorder (OR 28.94, 95% CI 3.45 to 242.57) but not in PTSD (OR 2.03, 95% CI 0.67 to 6.15). Doses of 0.5 mg/kg or more reduced social anxiety more than lower doses [9].
- Population
- 6 acute randomized trials: 2 in social anxiety disorder, 3 in PTSD, 1 in OCD [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Very small trials, shown by the very wide intervals [9]. Not an FDA-approved use.
Stress and anxiety
Limited evidence: acute stress fell modestly, mostly in high-bias studies, and a 28-day trial found perceived stress fell equally on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The reduction in acute stress after a single dose was modest (SMD 0.31) and largely influenced by high-risk-of-bias studies. Anxiety effects were inconsistent and not significant, except one study in psychotic anxiety at 400 mg a day for 8 weeks (SMD 0.54) [1]. A systematic review of 9 trials of pure theanine described possible stress and anxiety reduction at 200 to 400 mg a day in people under stressful conditions [4]. In 30 adults with moderate stress given 400 mg a day for 28 days, perceived stress fell 17.98% with theanine and 17.88% with placebo, and salivary cortisol did not differ between groups [5].
- Population
- Healthy adults and clinical groups [1][4]. 30 adults with moderate stress [5].
- Sources
- [1], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The 28-day trial was funded by Ethical Naturals, which sells the extract tested, and one author was its employee [5].
Multiple sclerosis
Small trials found mixed results in multiple sclerosis: one saw better mental health and pain scores, another no difference from placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a crossover trial of 80 people, 4.5 mg nightly for 8 weeks raised the SF-36 mental component score by 3.3 points (p 0.04) and the Mental Health Inventory by 6 points (p < 0.01), and improved pain effects by 1.6 points (p 0.04) [10]. In a 17-week crossover trial of 96 people, pain, energy, emotional well-being, cognitive function and overall quality of life did not differ from placebo [11].
- Population
- Adults with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, 80 at one center [10] and 96 at two universities [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Only 60 of 80 completed the first trial, and its authors state dropouts and data errors cut its statistical power [10]. Neither trial measured relapses or disability as a main outcome.
Generalized anxiety disorder
Small trials disagree: one found Swedish massage lowered anxiety more than light touch, and another found massage did not differ from a relaxing room or heat therapy.
Compared with light touch [13]; thermotherapy [14]; a relaxing room [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 47 untreated adults with generalized anxiety disorder, twice-weekly Swedish massage for 6 weeks lowered Hamilton Anxiety scores by 11.67 points against 8.41 with light touch (difference 3.26, P = .030) [13]. In 68 adults with the disorder, massage, thermotherapy and a relaxing room all lowered anxiety scores by 10 to 13 points, with no difference between groups (P = .39), and gains held at 26 weeks [14].
- Population
- 47 adults, 40 analyzed [13]. 68 adults [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Two small trials. The authors of [14] attributed the improvement in every group to a general relaxation response.
Cognition and dementia
Mixed results: one trial found better cognitive composite scores, most other trial outcomes did not differ, and two cohort meta-analyses found no significant dementia link.
Compared with a control diet of advice to reduce dietary fat [14]; an alternate diet the abstract does not describe [15]; people with the lowest Mediterranean diet adherence, in cohorts [16], [17]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 334 PREDIMED participants retested after a median 4.1 years, the olive oil diet scored better on global and frontal composites and the nut diet on memory against a low-fat control, while all composites fell in the control group [14]. Across 5 RCTs (1,888 participants), only 8 of 66 cognitive outcomes favored a Mediterranean diet, 2 favored controls, and no trial found less cognitive impairment or dementia [15]. In cohort meta-analyses, high adherence was not significantly linked to dementia risk (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.03 [16], HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.05 [17]).
- Population
- Cognitively healthy adults with a mean age of 66.9 at high cardiovascular risk [14]; adults in 5 RCTs [15]; older adults in prospective cohorts, observational [16][17].
- Sources
- [14], [15], [16], [17]
- Caveats
- The review could not pool the trials [15]. The prescribed diets varied a lot between trials [15]. Within one cohort meta-analysis, the link reached significance in studies following people 10 years or less (HR 0.72) [16].
Sleep
Mixed results: sleep scores improved in 10 athletes after 14 nights of whole-body red light, and pooled depression trials found no significant effect on sleep.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 20 female basketball players, 30 minutes of whole-body red light every night for 14 days improved Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, serum melatonin and 12-minute run performance compared with no light (P < .05) [33]. In trials of photobiomodulation for depression, sleep outcomes did not differ significantly from control (SMD -0.82, 95% CI -2.41 to 0.77) [24].
- Population
- 20 athletes with a mean age of 18.6, 10 per group [33]. People with depression symptoms [24].
- Sources
- [33], [24]
- Caveats
- The athlete study had no sham light, so the comparison group knew it was untreated [33].
Memory and mood
Limited evidence: of 10 studies, 3 found some cognitive gains and 5 no effect, with small pooled gains in recognition and mood.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Of 10 studies, 3 found improvement in some cognitive measures, 2 mixed findings and 5 no effect. Pooled data showed better delayed recognition (SMD 0.39, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.70) and lower negative mood (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.05) [10].
- Population
- 10 RCTs. The pooled analyses each had 3 studies and about 165 participants [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The authors call the literature inconsistent and limited [10].
Depression added to an antidepressant
Small trials found mixed results added to an antidepressant. One raised response to 36% against 18% on placebo, and another found no difference.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 73 people not responding to a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, adding 800 mg twice a day for 6 weeks raised response to 36.1% against 17.6% on placebo, and remission to 25.8% against 11.7% [3]. In 107 non-remitting outpatients, adding 800 mg a day for 8 weeks did not differ from placebo (response 54.3% against 50.0%, p 0.51 for symptom scores) [4]. A 2020 review of 8 trials (1,011 subjects) found SAMe better than placebo in 3 of 5 placebo comparisons [5].
- Population
- Adults with major depression on antidepressants [3][4]. Trials of 2 to 12 weeks at 200 to 3,200 mg a day [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The two add-on trials disagree and used different doses. [3] was funded by NIMH and [4] by Australia's NHMRC. Europe PMC lists Mylan as a funder of [5].
Sleep
Mixed results: 83.5% of surveyed sauna users reported sleep benefits, while an 8-week trial in people with chronic headache found no change in sleep disturbance.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an online survey of 482 regular sauna users, 83.5% reported sleep benefits after sauna use [30]. In a randomized trial in chronic tension-type headache, sleep disturbance did not differ between the sauna and control groups after 8 weeks [20].
- Population
- 482 survey respondents who used a sauna about 1 to 2 times a week [30]. 37 people with chronic tension-type headache [20].
- Sources
- [30], [20]
- Caveats
- The survey is self-selected and self-reported, with no comparison group [30]. Sleep was a secondary outcome of the headache trial, and no trial measuring sleep with instruments was located.
Focus, memory and mental performance
Limited evidence: one placebo-controlled study found a nasal dose changed resting brain networks on fMRI in healthy adults. No memory or attention results were sourced.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 24 healthy volunteers, a single nasal dose of semax enlarged the medial frontal part of the brain's default mode network on resting-state fMRI, against placebo [9]. A 2007 hypothesis paper states that semax has been found to stimulate memory and attention in rodents and humans after nasal use [10]. FDA found that the human studies of its nootropic effects were in healthy adults or written in Russian, and did not evaluate the Russian-language reports [3].
- Population
- 24 healthy adults, mean age 43.9, 14 on semax and 10 on placebo [9].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [3]
- Caveats
- The fMRI study measured brain activity at rest, not focus, memory or performance [9]. The human memory and attention reports could not be read in full, and the hypothesis paper gives no figures [10].
Total sleep time, Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Charge 5, Fitbit Sense, Garmin Vivosmart 4, WHOOP 4.0 and Withings ScanWatch
Mixed results: one study found mean bias in total sleep time from 6 to 40 minutes across six wrist devices, with wide limits of agreement for all six.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Charge 5, Fitbit Sense, Garmin Vivosmart 4, WHOOP 4.0, Withings ScanWatch
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, one laboratory night
- Effect
- Mean bias against polysomnography was 6.3 minutes for Fitbit Sense (p = 0.285), 19.6 for Apple Watch Series 8, 24.5 for WHOOP 4.0, 38.4 for Garmin Vivosmart 4 and 39.9 for Withings ScanWatch, each an overestimate. The Fitbit Charge 5 difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.051). Limits of agreement ran from -38.4 to 77.6 minutes for Apple Watch Series 8 and from -124.7 to 137.3 minutes for Fitbit Sense. The authors treated a bias under 30 minutes as clinically satisfactory and named Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Charge 5 and Fitbit Sense as meeting it [2].
- Population
- 62 adults (52 men, 10 women, mean age 46.0), with and without suspected sleep apnea, each wearing two to four devices for one night. Usable nights per device ranged from 20 (Apple Watch) to 41 (Withings) [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- The paper's table and text give different Fitbit Charge 5 biases (11.1 and -5.7 minutes). Apple Watch data were missing or partial for 15 participants and Garmin data for 18. Firmware versions are not reported. Funded by Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship, and the authors declared no financial ties [2].
Total sleep time, WHOOP
Mixed results: small studies in healthy young adults found WHOOP within 14 minutes of polysomnography on average, while a later study of WHOOP 4.0 found a 24 minute overestimate.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- WHOOP strap, generation not stated in the abstracts [13][14]. WHOOP models pooled in a systematic review [15]. WHOOP 4.0 [2].
- Compared with
- Polysomnography. The systematic review also included a study using the Sleep Profiler EEG monitor [15].
- Effect
- Over 86 sleeps in 12 adults, WHOOP overestimated total sleep time by 8.2 minutes (SD 32.9), a difference that was not statistically significant. Bedtimes were entered by the researchers [13]. In 32 healthy adults, bias for sleep duration was 13.8 minutes and precision error 17.8 minutes [14]. A systematic review of 8 articles reported a WHOOP disagreement of -1.4 minutes for total sleep time and 21.0 minutes for REM sleep [15]. In 40 adults wearing WHOOP 4.0, total sleep time was overestimated by 24.5 minutes (p = 0.010), with limits of agreement from -101.1 to 150.0 minutes [2].
- Population
- 12 healthy adults, mean age 22.9, in a 10 day laboratory protocol [13]. 32 healthy adults, mean age 23.8, one night [14]. 8 articles [15]. 40 adults with and without suspected sleep apnea, one night [2].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [15], [2]
- Caveats
- In the 12-person study, sleep was scored by the company using its own algorithms, and its authors state the result depends on bedtimes being entered manually [13]. Samples were small and mostly young and healthy.
Sleep and wake detection, Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Charge 5, Fitbit Sense, Garmin Vivosmart 4, WHOOP 4.0 and Withings ScanWatch
One study found six wrist devices detected more than 90% of sleep epochs and 29 to 52% of wake epochs.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Charge 5, Fitbit Sense, Garmin Vivosmart 4, WHOOP 4.0, Withings ScanWatch
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, one laboratory night
- Effect
- Sensitivity for sleep epochs ranged from 91.7% (Fitbit Charge 5) to 96.3% (Apple Watch Series 8). Specificity for wake epochs was 52.2% for Apple Watch Series 8, 48.8% for Fitbit Sense, 47.5% for Fitbit Charge 5, 40.1% for WHOOP 4.0, 31.1% for Withings ScanWatch and 29.4% for Garmin Vivosmart 4. Cohen's kappa ranged from 0.21 (Garmin) to 0.53 (Apple Watch), which the authors describe as fair to moderate agreement [2].
- Population
- 62 adults (mean age 46.0) with and without suspected sleep apnea, one night [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- Usable nights per device ranged from 20 to 41. Firmware versions are not reported [2].
Sleep and wake detection, EarlySense Live, Fatigue Science Readiband, Fitbit Alta HR, Garmin Fenix 5S, Garmin Vivosmart 3, ResMed S+ and SleepScore Max
One study found seven devices detected sleep epochs with sensitivity of 0.93 or higher and wake epochs with specificity of 0.18 to 0.54.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Four wearables (Fatigue Science Readiband, Fitbit Alta HR, Garmin Fenix 5S, Garmin Vivosmart 3) and three nonwearable devices (EarlySense Live, ResMed S+, SleepScore Max)
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, three consecutive laboratory nights, with a research actigraph (Philips Respironics Actiwatch 2) worn alongside
- Effect
- Epoch sensitivity for sleep was 0.93 or higher for every device, and specificity for wake ran from 0.18 to 0.54. Bias in total sleep time was -0.3 minutes for ResMed S+, 2.6 for Fitbit Alta HR, 7.5 for SleepScore Max, 13.3 for Fatigue Science Readiband, 13.6 for EarlySense Live, 43.7 for Garmin Fenix 5S and 46.8 for Garmin Vivosmart 3, against 23.9 for the research actigraph. Limits of agreement for Fitbit Alta HR ran from -42.0 to 47.1 minutes and for Garmin Fenix 5S from -47.0 to 134.4 minutes. Sleep stage comparisons were mixed, and devices tended to perform less closely on nights with disrupted sleep [18].
- Population
- 34 healthy young adults (22 women, mean age 28.1), three nights including one with disrupted sleep [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- Funded by the US Office of Naval Research, with no funding or involvement from device companies. Each participant wore a subset of devices, so nights per device ranged from 29 to 51. Healthy young adults only [18].
Sleep stages, Amazon Halo Rise, Apple Watch 8, Fitbit Sense 2, Galaxy Watch 5, Google Nest Hub 2, Google Pixel Watch, Oura Ring 3, Withings Sleep Tracking Mat and three phone apps
One study found agreement with polysomnography on sleep stages ranged from a macro F1 score of 0.26 to 0.69 across 11 trackers.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Google Pixel Watch, Galaxy Watch 5, Fitbit Sense 2, Apple Watch 8, Oura Ring 3, Withings Sleep Tracking Mat, Google Nest Hub 2, Amazon Halo Rise, and the phone apps SleepRoutine, SleepScore and Pillow
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, in the laboratory
- Effect
- Macro F1 scores for epoch-by-epoch sleep stage classification ranged from 0.26 to 0.69. The SleepRoutine app scored 0.69 and Amazon Halo Rise 0.62. Cohen's kappa was moderate (0.4 to 0.6) for Google Pixel Watch, Galaxy Watch 5, Fitbit Sense 2, Amazon Halo Rise and SleepRoutine, fair (0.2 to 0.4) for Apple Watch 8, Oura Ring 3, Withings Sleep Tracking Mat and SleepScore, and slight for Google Nest Hub 2 and Pillow [20].
- Population
- 75 participants at a tertiary hospital and a sleep clinic in Korea, 349,114 epochs [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- Several authors are affiliated with Asleep, the maker of SleepRoutine, and hold stock or stock options in it. SleepRoutine had the highest score. Participants were recruited at a hospital and a sleep clinic, and scores varied with body mass index, sleep efficiency and apnea severity [20].
Sleep stages, Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Sense 2 and Oura Ring Gen3
Mixed results: one study found Oura stage durations did not differ from polysomnography, while Fitbit and Apple Watch underestimated deep sleep by 15 and 43 minutes.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Sense 2, Oura Ring Gen3
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, one inpatient night
- Effect
- The Oura Ring did not differ from polysomnography in wake, light, deep or REM sleep duration. The Fitbit overestimated light sleep by 18 minutes and underestimated deep sleep by 15 minutes. The Apple Watch overestimated light sleep by 45 minutes and underestimated deep sleep by 43 minutes and wake by 7 minutes. Sensitivity for individual stages was 76.0 to 79.5% for Oura, 61.7 to 78.0% for Fitbit and 50.5 to 86.1% for Apple Watch. Sensitivity for sleep versus wake was 95% or higher for all three [3].
- Population
- 35 adults aged 20 to 50 without a sleep disorder, one night [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Funded by Oura Ring Inc., and the lead author sits on Oura's medical advisory board. Intraclass correlations for stage durations were 0.13 to 0.52 across the three devices. Healthy sleepers only [3].
Sleep
Mixed results: two small trials found better sleep with slow breathing before bed, while a month of 5-minute daily breathwork did not change sleep measured by a wearable.
Compared with social media use for the same time [13]; spontaneous breathing, before and after in the same people [14]; mindfulness meditation [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 64 healthy young adults, 15 minutes of slow-paced breathing each evening for 30 days improved Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores and raised overnight cardiac vagal activity, compared with 15 minutes of social media use [13]. In 14 people with self-reported insomnia, 20 minutes of paced breathing before bed shortened time to fall asleep, cut awakenings and raised sleep efficiency on polysomnography [14]. In the 1-month trial, hours of sleep, sleep efficiency and sleep score from a wearable did not change in any group or differ between groups [4].
- Population
- 64 healthy adults with a mean age of 22 [13]. 14 people with self-reported insomnia and 14 without sleep complaints [14]. 114 adults invited [4].
- Sources
- [13], [14], [4]
- Caveats
- Small samples, self-rated sleep in one trial [13], and no randomized control group in the insomnia study [14].
Sleep
Small trials found mixed results: one found longer sleep over 7 days, while two others found no change in sleep.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 20 adults, 7 days of concentrate raised urinary melatonin and increased time in bed, total sleep time and sleep efficiency [7]. In 44 adults over 30 days, sleep time and quality did not differ from placebo [8]. In 34 adults with overweight or obesity, 500 mg capsules for 14 days changed no sleep or inflammation measure [9]. A 2025 review of 7 studies found 3 reporting improved sleep measures [10].
- Population
- Healthy adults [7][8]; adults with overweight or obesity and sleep complaints [9].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9], [10]
- Caveats
- No meta-analysis. The two null trials were funded by the Cherry Marketing Institute [8][9].
Migraine prevention in children and teenagers
Small trials found mixed results in children and teenagers: one label trial found fewer attacks at 100 mg, while a larger trial found no difference from placebo.
Compared with placebo [5][3]; amitriptyline [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In the trial behind the approval for ages 12 to 17, 100 mg reduced the monthly attack rate by 28% more than placebo, with a mean drop of 3.0 against 1.7 attacks [3]. In a later trial in ages 8 to 17, stopped early for futility, headache days halved in 55% on topiramate, 52% on amitriptyline and 61% on placebo, with no difference in disability [5].
- Population
- 103 adolescents aged 12 to 17 over 16 weeks [3]; 361 children and adolescents aged 8 to 17 over 24 weeks, 328 analyzed [5].
- Sources
- [3], [5]
- Caveats
- The placebo response in the later trial was high. Paresthesia (31% against 8%) and weight loss (8% against 0%) were more common on topiramate [5].
A school volunteering program in a randomized trial
One trial of a school volunteering program found no change in a standard thinking test by intention to treat. Brain volume rose in men, against declines in controls.
Compared with a low-activity control group [7]; controls in the same trial [8]; controls offered usual volunteer opportunities [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- On a timed attention test, intention-to-treat analyses found no significant improvement, while people with the highest attendance showed less variability in speed at 24 months [7]. Over 2 years, men in the program gained 0.7% to 1.6% in cortical and hippocampal volume while men in the control group declined, and women in the program gained 0.3% to 0.54% against declines of about 1% in controls. Only the gains in men were significant [8]. Volunteers reported higher generativity, a sense of contributing to others, at each follow-up [9].
- Population
- 336 older adults without dementia [7]. 111 men and women in the brain imaging study [8]. Older adults in the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial, randomized to serve as tutors in elementary schools or to control [9].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- One trial with small imaging and cognition subsamples. Brain volume is not a measure of memory or dementia. The cognition gains appeared only in people who attended most [7].
Sleep
Mixed results: one small trial found better rated sleep and fewer night movements after a session following evening training, and a depression trial found no change in sleep.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 22 physically active men, 3 minutes at -40°C after evening training reduced movements during the night and improved subjective sleep quality compared with passive recovery (p < 0.05). Pain the next morning was lower (p < 0.01) [20]. In adults with depression, self-assessed sleep did not change with 10 sessions against sham (p > 0.05) [8].
- Population
- 22 physically active men [20]. 56 adults with a depressive episode who completed the trial [8].
- Sources
- [20], [8]
- Caveats
- The sleep trial had no sham, and its chamber ran at -40°C, warmer than the others on this page.
Not shown to help78
ADHD symptoms, blinded ratings and sham-controlled trials
Not shown to reduce ADHD symptoms when rated by people who did not know the treatment, or against sham neurofeedback, in two meta-analyses and a double-blind trial.
Compared with control conditions rated by assessors probably unaware of the treatment, including active and sham controls [6][7]; sham neurofeedback using prerecorded brain-wave recordings [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 38 trials, ADHD symptom reports by people probably unaware of the treatment showed no improvement (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.18, 20 trials, 1,214 participants). Limited to trials using standard protocols, a small improvement appeared (SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.40). Of five lab measures of thinking, only processing speed improved slightly (SMD 0.35) [7]. An earlier meta-analysis found no significant effect with probably blinded ratings or in trials with active or sham controls, and no effect on lab measures of inhibition or attention [6]. In 144 children given theta/beta neurofeedback or a sham of equal length, parent- and teacher-rated inattention improved in both groups and did not differ at the end of treatment (d 0.01) or 13 months later (d 0.23). Responders were 61% and 54% [8].
- Population
- 2,472 participants aged 5 to 40 in 38 trials [7]. 520 children and adolescents in 13 trials [6]. 142 children aged 7 to 10 with moderate or severe ADHD [8].
- Sources
- [7], [6], [8]
- Caveats
- Blinding in the sham trial was rated excellent [8]. The unblinded results are in the block below.
Depression, compared with other psychotherapies
Not shown to differ meaningfully from other psychotherapies for depression. A tiny edge in one analysis disappeared in most sensitivity checks.
Compared with other psychotherapies [3][4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- CBT was ahead of other psychotherapies by g 0.06 (95% CI 0 to 0.12), a difference that became non-significant in most sensitivity analyses [3]. An earlier analysis found no indication that CBT differed from other psychotherapies [4].
- Population
- 52,702 patients in 409 trials [3]. 115 studies [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Both analyses come from the same research group.
Depression
Not linked to depression in pet owners in a meta-analysis of 21 studies, or in older dog owners in a systematic review.
Compared with people without pets [10]; older adults without a dog [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pet ownership was not linked to depression (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.995 to 1.07). Dog ownership was not linked (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.789 to 1.10), and cat ownership was linked to slightly higher risk (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09) [10]. In community-dwelling adults aged 70 and over, having a dog was not linked to depressive symptoms, and regular contact with a dog was linked to fewer anxiety symptoms [11].
- Population
- 159,322 participants in 21 studies [10]. 25,138 older adults in 5 cross-sectional studies and 1 controlled before-and-after study [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational and mostly cross-sectional. People may get a pet for support when already low, which can hide or reverse a link.
Total sleep time, consumer wrist-worn devices pooled
Not shown to match polysomnography for total sleep time in pooled studies, differing by about 17 minutes on average, with wearables tending to overestimate sleep.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Pooled across studies of Fitbit, Jawbone, myCadian watch, WHOOP strap, Garmin, Basis B1, Zulu Watch, Huami Arc, E4 wristband, Fatigue Science Readiband, Apple Watch and Xiaomi Mi Band 5
- Compared with
- Polysomnography
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 24 studies found wrist-worn trackers differed from polysomnography on total sleep time (mean difference -16.9 minutes, 95% CI -26.3 to -7.4), sleep efficiency (-4.7%, 95% CI -7.1 to -2.3), sleep latency (2.6 minutes, 95% CI 0.6 to 4.5) and wake after sleep onset (13.3 minutes, 95% CI 4.5 to 22.0) [4]. A second meta-analysis found wearables overestimated total sleep time and sleep efficiency and underestimated wake after sleep onset, with substantial variability between devices [5].
- Population
- 798 participants in 24 studies [4]. Healthy adults in 16 studies with simultaneous wearable and laboratory polysomnography recordings, 10 of them pooled [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The abstract of the first review does not state which direction its mean differences run [4]. Pooled figures mix device models and generations. The second review reported methodological heterogeneity and risk of bias, and found no device performed consistently above the others [5].
Compared with DOACs in atrial fibrillation
Not shown to match DOACs in atrial fibrillation: stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 3.69% on warfarin against 3.01%, with about twice the brain bleeds.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across four trials, DOACs lowered stroke or systemic embolism by 19% against warfarin (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.91) and death by 10% (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.95) [4]. In patient-level data, stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 3.69% on warfarin against 3.01% on a standard-dose DOAC, death in 8.42% against 7.76% and intracranial bleeding in 1.40% against 0.63% [5]. In rheumatic heart disease with atrial fibrillation, the result went the other way, with fewer cardiovascular events or deaths on a vitamin K antagonist than on rivaroxaban [6].
- Population
- 71,683 participants in four trials, 29,272 of them on warfarin [4][5]; 4,531 patients with rheumatic heart disease and atrial fibrillation [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- The four trials were funded by DOAC manufacturers. The gap in major bleeding was larger at trial centers where warfarin control was poorer [4].
Mood and energy, the sugar rush
Not shown to lift mood at any point after eating it, in a meta-analysis of 31 studies. Fatigue was higher and alertness lower in the first hour.
Compared with placebo [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 176 effect sizes, carbohydrate had no positive effect on any aspect of mood at any time after eating. In the first hour, it was linked to more fatigue and less alertness than placebo [5].
- Population
- 1,259 participants in 31 studies [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- The review covered carbohydrate in general, mostly sugars, taken in single doses. It does not test daily eating patterns.
Behavior and thinking in children
Not shown to change behavior or thinking in children against an artificial sweetener placebo, in a meta-analysis of 23 blinded studies.
Compared with an artificial sweetener placebo, with children, parents and staff blinded [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 14 measures of behavior and thinking, effect sizes ranged from -0.14 for direct observation to +0.30 for academic tests, and every 95% confidence interval included zero [6].
- Population
- Children in 23 within-subject studies from 16 reports [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- The authors note a small effect, or effects in some children, cannot be ruled out [6]. The review dates from 1995.
Depression that has not responded to an antidepressant
Not shown to reduce depression scores when lisdexamfetamine was added to an antidepressant in two 8-week trials of adults with an inadequate response.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In two phase 3 trials, the difference from placebo in change in Montgomery-Asberg depression scores was 0.1 points (95% CI -1.7 to 2.0) in one and -0.5 points (95% CI -2.3 to 1.3) in the other. Dry mouth was the only adverse event reported by more than 5% at twice the placebo rate in both [19].
- Population
- Adults aged 18 to 65 with major depressive disorder and an inadequate response to 8 weeks of an antidepressant, in two trials [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for lisdexamfetamine. The trials excluded people with other psychiatric conditions. Not an approved use.
Heart attack, stroke and death
Not shown to change heart attack or death in 15 trials of B6, folic acid or B12. Stroke was about 10% lower.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 15 trials of vitamins B6, B9 or B12, heart attack (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.10) and death from any cause (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06) did not change. Stroke was lower (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99) [1]. In HOPE-2, folic acid, B6 and B12 lowered homocysteine and did not change major cardiovascular events (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.07) [2].
- Population
- 71,422 participants in 15 trials [1]; 5,522 people aged 55 or older with vascular disease or diabetes, 5 years [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The Cochrane authors rated heart attack and mortality evidence high quality [1]. Trials tested folic acid, B6 and B12, not full B-complex products.
Memory and cognitive aging
Not shown to change memory or thinking across 11 trials. One trial in older adults with mild cognitive impairment found slower brain shrinkage.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 11 trials, B vitamins lowered homocysteine by 26% to 28% and did not change memory, speed, executive function or global cognition (z score difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.06) [3]. In one trial in mild cognitive impairment, brain atrophy was 0.76% a year on B vitamins and 1.08% on placebo (P = 0.001) [4].
- Population
- 22,000 participants in 11 trials, mean 2.3 to 5 years [3]; 168 people over 70 with mild cognitive impairment who completed MRI scans, 24 months [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The atrophy trial measured brain volume, not cognition. Its effect was concentrated in people with homocysteine above 13 µmol/L [4].
Anxiety disorders
Not shown to reduce anxiety symptoms in social phobia or panic disorder against placebo, in two systematic reviews of small trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2025 systematic review found no evidence of a benefit of beta-blockers against placebo or benzodiazepines in social phobia or panic disorder, with all pooled comparisons non-significant (p of 0.54 or higher) [18]. A 2016 review of propranolol found no significant difference from benzodiazepines in short-term treatment of panic disorder, and no effect on symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder [19].
- Population
- 10 studies, 5 pooled with 179 participants [18]; 8 trials in panic disorder (130 people), specific phobia (37), social phobia (16) and post-traumatic stress disorder (19) [19].
- Sources
- [18], [19]
- Caveats
- Small trials with missing data and high or unclear risk of bias [18]. Performance anxiety outside a diagnosed disorder is covered in the block above.
Migraine, compared with drugs or other active treatment
Not shown to reduce migraine frequency more than drug treatment or cognitive behavioral therapy in adults, or more than other active treatment in children.
Compared with pharmacotherapy or cognitive behavioral therapy [2]; other active treatment and other behavioral treatment [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 3 trials (278 participants), headache frequency did not differ between biofeedback and active treatments such as drugs or CBT [2]. In children, biofeedback added nothing when combined with other behavioral treatment and had no significant advantage over active treatment [4].
- Population
- Adults in 3 trials [2]. Children and adolescents in 5 trials [4].
- Sources
- [2], [4]
- Caveats
- Few trials, and the 2025 review authors also report a possible added benefit when combined with drugs [2].
66 more
Added to an SSRI for depression
Not shown to raise response over placebo when added to an SSRI for depression in two placebo-controlled trials of about 100 people each.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people who had not responded to citalopram or paroxetine, 50.9% responded after 4 weeks of added buspirone and 46.7% after added placebo, a difference that was not significant [5]. In a second trial in people not responding to fluoxetine or citalopram, depression scores at 6 weeks did not differ between added buspirone and placebo overall. A subgroup with severe symptoms improved more on buspirone [6]. In a large trial without a placebo arm, remission was 30.1% with added buspirone and 29.7% with added bupropion, and more people stopped buspirone for intolerance (20.6% vs 12.5%) [7]. An open-label trial of 89 people found no significant benefit from adding buspirone to escitalopram [8].
- Population
- 119 adults [5]; 102 outpatients [6]; adults whose depression had not remitted on citalopram [7]; 89 adults [8].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The authors of [5] argued their own trial may have been inconclusive. The severe-symptom result in [6] is a subgroup finding. Not an approved use.
Panic disorder
Not shown to help panic disorder: two reviews found no benefit over placebo, and more people dropped out on buspirone.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In three trials of buspirone, dropout for any reason was about twice as frequent as on placebo (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.07). Effects on general anxiety (MD -2.20, 95% CI -5.45 to 1.06) and agoraphobia were uncertain, and no trial gave usable response data [10]. A later meta-analysis found azapirones did not outperform placebo in panic disorder or social anxiety disorder [1].
- Population
- 170 adults with panic disorder in 3 trials [10]; trials of azapirones across anxiety disorders [1].
- Sources
- [10], [1]
- Caveats
- Few small trials, all rated at high risk of attrition bias [10].
Anxiety in children and teenagers
Not shown to reduce generalized anxiety symptoms in children and teenagers in two placebo-controlled trials of 559 patients aged 6 to 17.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In two 6-week trials at 15 to 60 mg a day, buspirone and placebo did not differ on symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder [4]. A reanalysis of the two trials found buspirone did not separate from placebo in the fixed-dose trial or the flexible-dose trial, and more children dropped out for adverse events on buspirone [11].
- Population
- 559 pediatric patients aged 6 to 17 with generalized anxiety disorder [4]; the same two trials, with 341 and 227 participants [11].
- Sources
- [4], [11]
- Caveats
- The reanalysis judged both trials underpowered to detect small effects [11].
Migraine, compared with sham manipulation
Not shown to reduce migraine days more than sham manipulation. Migraine days fell in both groups, and the trial authors attributed the effect to a placebo response.
Compared with sham manipulation [9][10]; usual drug treatment [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 104 people with migraine, migraine days fell from baseline in the manipulation, sham and usual care groups, and the reduction did not differ between groups. Migraine duration and headache index fell more with manipulation than with usual care by the end of follow-up [9]. A systematic review of high- and acceptable-quality trials found manipulation was not superior to sham for migraine [10].
- Population
- 104 adults with at least one migraine a month in Norway [9]. 6 trials with 534 participants across several conditions [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- One trial of migraine passed the review's quality bar [10]. Blinding was sustained throughout the trial [9].
Cognition in Alzheimer disease
Not shown to change cognition scores in people with Alzheimer disease across 4 trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 4 RCTs (702 patients with Alzheimer disease), ADAS-Cog scores did not differ significantly from placebo (MD 1.37, 95% CI 0.00 to 2.73, p 0.05, I² 35%) [31].
- Population
- 376 patients on omega-3 and 326 on placebo [31].
- Sources
- [31]
- Caveats
- Few trials. Higher ADAS-Cog scores mean worse cognition, and the interval reaches no difference [31].
Memory and cognitive decline
Not shown to change memory or cognitive scores in adults across 9 placebo-controlled trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 9 placebo-controlled trials (2,835 participants, median 6 months), folic acid with or without other B vitamins changed cognitive scores by an SMD of 0.01 (95% CI -0.08 to 0.10). Memory, speed, language and executive function each showed no effect [6].
- Population
- Adults in 9 RCTs [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Trials ran up to 3 years. None recorded dementia incidence [6].
Cognitive decline in older adults
Not shown to track cognitive decline: folate did not predict decline in one cohort, and trials of B vitamins containing folic acid found no cognitive effect.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an Oxford cohort followed for 10 years, markers of vitamin B12 status and homocysteine predicted cognitive decline and serum folate did not [13]. In a meta-analysis of 11 trials, B vitamins lowered homocysteine by 26% to 28% and had no significant effect on global cognitive function (z score difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02) [14].
- Population
- 1,648 older adults in Oxford, United Kingdom [13]. 22,000 participants in 11 trials [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- The cohort finding is observational. The trials tested B vitamins given to lower homocysteine and were not trials of treating folate deficiency [14].
Mild cognitive impairment
Not shown to change cognition, daily living or global status at 6 months in adults with mild cognitive impairment.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a 2026 Cochrane review, 12 placebo-controlled trials (1,913 participants) tested ginkgo in mild cognitive impairment. At 6 months, ginkgo probably had little to no effect on global clinical status (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.01, 3 studies, 631 participants), cognition (ADAS-cog MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.51, 2 studies, 508 participants) or daily living (1 study, 350 participants), at moderate certainty [4].
- Population
- Adults with mild cognitive impairment [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Each pooled outcome draws on 1 to 3 of the 12 trials [4].
Memory and attention in healthy people
Not shown to improve memory, attention or executive function in healthy people.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across RCTs in healthy people, effect sizes were near zero for memory (d -0.04, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.07, 13 trials, 1,132 participants), executive function (d -0.05) and attention (d -0.08). Results did not vary with age, trial length, dose or sample size [6].
- Population
- Healthy individuals [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Effect sizes were derived from the trials that reported usable data [6].
Tinnitus
Not shown to change tinnitus severity, loudness or quality of life in adults with tinnitus, at very low certainty.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of 12 studies (1,915 participants) found ginkgo may have little to no effect on tinnitus severity at 3 to 6 months (MD -1.35 on a 0 to 100 scale, 95% CI -8.26 to 5.55, 2 studies, 85 participants, very low certainty). Loudness and quality of life also showed little to no difference [7].
- Population
- Adults with subjective tinnitus [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Risk of bias was high or unclear, and limited pooling was possible [7].
Multiple sclerosis
Not shown to benefit people with multiple sclerosis in a meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials from the 1980s.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 12 randomized studies, most testing 20 sessions at 1.75 to 2.5 ATA over 4 weeks against placebo, found no clinically significant benefit and no plausible effect on the course of the disease [24].
- Population
- People with multiple sclerosis in 12 randomized trials run between 1983 and 1987 [24].
- Sources
- [24]
- Caveats
- No trial has compared it with current standard treatment. The reviewers leave open a small effect in an unidentified subgroup.
Depression and anxiety
Not shown to change depression, anxiety or obsessive-compulsive symptoms. One small trial found fewer panic attacks on 12 g a day.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Inositol did not significantly change depressive, anxiety or obsessive-compulsive symptoms against placebo. Responders in depression were marginally more common (P = 0.06) [12]. In a 4-week crossover trial, panic attack frequency and severity fell more on 12 g a day than placebo [13].
- Population
- 242 people in 7 depression trials and 70 in 4 anxiety trials [12]; 21 people with panic disorder [13].
- Sources
- [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Trials were few and small [12]. The panic trial is one of four pooled anxiety trials [12][13].
Child development after iodine in pregnancy
Not shown to change child cognition, language or motor scores after iodine in pregnancy in women with mild to moderate deficiency.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pooled trials found no effect on child cognitive scores (mean difference -0.18, 95% CI -1.22 to 0.87), language or motor scores [3]. In the largest trial, verbal IQ at age 5 to 6 was 89.5 on 200 µg a day and 90.2 on placebo (difference -0.7, 95% CI -2.9 to 1.5), and performance IQ 97.5 against 99.1 [4].
- Population
- Mildly to moderately iodine-deficient pregnant women, 10 RCTs in the review with 2 pooled for cognition [3]; 832 women in India and Thailand, 313 children analyzed [4].
- Sources
- [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Only 1 of 3 trials on child development was adequately powered [3]. These results do not describe severe deficiency. The trial was funded in part by the Nestlé Foundation [4].
Nerve pain and fibromyalgia
Not shown to relieve nerve pain in adults at 200 to 400 mg a day, in a Cochrane review of 12 trials. Almost 10% on lamotrigine reported a rash.
Compared with placebo [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- No study gave first-tier evidence for an efficacy outcome, and the review found no convincing evidence of pain relief at doses of 200 to 400 mg daily. Almost 10% of participants taking lamotrigine reported a skin rash [9].
- Population
- 1,511 adults with diabetic nerve pain, HIV-related nerve pain, post-stroke pain, spinal cord injury pain, chemotherapy nerve pain, trigeminal neuralgia or mixed nerve pain, in 12 studies mostly 8 weeks or longer [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- No fibromyalgia trial was found, so the fibromyalgia part of the question rests on no data [9].
Focus and attention, against active programs
Not shown to improve attention or thinking skills more than active comparison programs, in two meta-analyses.
Compared with active comparators [19]; active control programs [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Mindfulness programs did not outperform active comparators on objective cognitive tests [19]. A review limited to active controls found low evidence of no effect, or insufficient evidence, for attention [3].
- Population
- 2,931 adults in 56 studies [19]. 3,515 participants in 47 trials [3].
- Sources
- [19], [3]
- Caveats
- Few trials measured attention against an active control, so a small effect could be missed.
Alzheimer's disease
Not shown to change cognition or daily activities in Alzheimer's disease in two trials of a related compound. Later gains came only in a subgroup.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 15 months, LMTM, a reduced form of the methylthioninium molecule, at 75 mg or 125 mg twice daily did not differ from a 4 mg control on cognition (ADAS-Cog differences -0.02 and -0.43) or daily activities (ADCS-ADL differences -0.93 and -0.34) [1]. In a second phase 3 trial, the same compound under the name HMTM, at 8 or 16 mg per day, did not differ from control on its co-primary cognitive and daily-activity endpoints at 52 weeks. In the subgroup with mild cognitive impairment, starting 16 mg a year earlier was followed by less cognitive decline at 78 weeks (P 0.0291) and 104 weeks (P 0.0308). Plasma neurofilament light, a marker of nerve damage, rose less at 52 weeks (P 0.0291) [2].
- Population
- 891 people under 90 with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in 16 countries [1]; 598 people with amyloid on PET, 263 with mild cognitive impairment and 335 with mild to moderate dementia, at 82 centers [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- LMTM is related to but not the same as methylene blue. In both trials the control arm received a low dose of methylthioninium to mask urine discoloration, and the authors of [2] attribute the lack of separation to activity in that arm. The later benefits in [2] come from a subgroup and a delayed-start comparison after all participants moved to 16 mg. Funded by TauRx Pharmaceuticals, the developer [1].
Cranial osteopathy
Not shown to rest on a reliable diagnosis or to have strong trial evidence. A review found examiners did not agree and rigorous efficacy trials were almost non-existent.
Compared with control conditions in randomized or crossover trials, which the review abstract does not describe [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Studies comparing two examiners, or one examiner on two occasions, found the diagnostic procedures of cranial osteopathy unreliable in many ways. Of 14 efficacy trials, 2 were at high risk of bias, 9 had major doubts about bias and 3 were at low risk, and those 3 did not consider other explanations such as a nonspecific effect of treatment [15].
- Population
- 9 reliability studies and 14 efficacy trials across many conditions [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- The review included only studies in English or French with open full text [15].
Pain, compared with sham reflexology or plain foot massage
Not shown to ease pain more than sham reflexology or plain foot massage in three trials, in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and advanced breast cancer.
Compared with sham reflexology [4]; sham massage [5]; lay foot manipulation, and conventional care [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 73 people with multiple sclerosis, pain fell by a median of 50% in both the reflexology and sham reflexology groups over 10 weeks, and reflexology was not superior to sham [4]. In 30 people with Parkinson's disease and chronic pain, pain fell 12.3 mm on a 100-mm scale with reflexology and 17.9 mm with sham massage, with no difference between groups (P = 0.88) [5]. In 385 women with advanced breast cancer, pain did not differ between reflexology, lay foot manipulation and conventional care [6].
- Population
- 73 people with multiple sclerosis [4]. 30 adults with Parkinson's disease in France [5]. 385 women with advanced breast cancer at 13 US oncology clinics [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Pain improved substantially in both arms of the sham-controlled trials, so touch and attention may account for much of the effect [4][5].
Any condition, systematic reviews
Not shown to treat any condition in a review of nine trials. A Cochrane review found too few data to judge Reiki for anxiety or depression.
Compared with sham Reiki and conventional care [5]; control conditions in three trials, which the source abstract does not describe [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Of nine trials, two suggested benefit over sham for depression and one did not report group differences. There was no difference from sham for stroke recovery, for anxiety in women having amniocentesis, or for pain in diabetic nerve pain, and no effect on anxiety or depression against conventional care in women having breast biopsy. The reviewers found the evidence insufficient for any condition [5]. A Cochrane review found three trials with only 25 people with anxiety and 17 with depression, and no evidence that Reiki is either beneficial or harmful for them [6]. NCCIH states that "Reiki hasn't been clearly shown to be effective for any health-related purpose" [1].
- Population
- 9 randomized trials [5]. 3 trials in adults aged 16 or over [6].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [1]
- Caveats
- Trials were small, rarely replicated and often poorly reported [5][6].
Depression as a stand-alone treatment
Not shown to lower depression symptoms more than placebo in adults with major depression. Results were similar to imipramine and escitalopram, in mostly low-quality evidence.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of 8 trials (934 adults) found no strong evidence of a difference from placebo in depressive symptoms (SMD -0.54, 95% CI -1.54 to 0.46, 2 studies, 142 participants, very low quality). Results were similar to imipramine (SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.27, 4 studies, 619 participants) and escitalopram (MD 0.12, 95% CI -2.75 to 2.99, 1 study) [1]. In a 12-week trial of 189 outpatients, response was 36% on SAMe, 34% on escitalopram and 30% on placebo, and no group differed from the others [2].
- Population
- Adults with major depression, oral or injected SAMe [1]. 189 outpatients in the US [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Most evidence was rated low or very low quality [1]. The 12-week trial was funded by NIH's NCCIH, and escitalopram also did not separate from placebo [2].
Sleep stages, finger-worn devices pooled
Not shown to match polysomnography for sleep stages, with pooled accuracy of 65% for light sleep, 81% for deep sleep and 74% for REM sleep.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- 11 finger-worn devices pooled across 28 articles, including Oura Ring generations
- Compared with
- Polysomnography
- Effect
- Pooled accuracy was 0.65 for light sleep, 0.81 for deep sleep and 0.74 for REM sleep, against 0.87 for sleep versus wake. The authors concluded finger-worn devices do not replace polysomnography for detailed sleep architecture [19].
- Population
- 28 articles published up to April 2025, with sleep staging studied primarily in healthy participants [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- Devices used different sensors and algorithms, and the pooled figures combine device generations [19].
Depression in children and teenagers
Not shown to reduce depression more than placebo in children and teenagers on venlafaxine or desvenlafaxine. Duloxetine showed a small reduction in low-certainty evidence.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a network meta-analysis of 14 antidepressants, only fluoxetine reduced symptoms more than placebo, and venlafaxine (OR 3.19) and duloxetine (OR 2.80) had more discontinuations for adverse events than placebo [23]. In a Cochrane network meta-analysis on a scale running from 17 to 113, desvenlafaxine did not differ from placebo (MD -0.07, 95% CI -3.51 to 3.36), and duloxetine lowered scores by 2.70 points (95% CI 0.37 to 5.03) in low-certainty evidence. Venlafaxine was associated with higher odds of suicide-related outcomes than placebo (OR 13.84, 95% CI 1.79 to 106.90) [24].
- Population
- 5,260 children and adolescents in 34 trials [23]; 26 studies in children and adolescents [24].
- Sources
- [23], [24], [10], [9]
- Caveats
- The interval for the venlafaxine suicide-related estimate is very wide. The Cochrane authors described the symptom reductions for most antidepressants as small and unimportant [24]. Venlafaxine and desvenlafaxine are not approved for use in pediatric patients [10][9].
Differences between SNRIs
Not shown to differ in depression response between duloxetine and venlafaxine or desvenlafaxine in four trials. More people dropped out on duloxetine than on venlafaxine.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Four studies compared duloxetine with venlafaxine (three) or desvenlafaxine (one) and found no statistically significant differences in efficacy. Dropout for any cause was more frequent on duloxetine than on venlafaxine (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.15) and than on the SSRI escitalopram (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.62) [3].
- Population
- 1,978 participants in 4 studies comparing duloxetine with another SNRI [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Few trials per comparison, with wide pooled intervals [3].
Insomnia, against exercise or CBT
Not shown to improve sleep more than conventional exercise. In one trial, CBT for insomnia produced more remission and better sleep than Tai Chi Chih.
Compared with conventional exercise [14]; cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Sleep measures by actigraphy did not differ between tai chi and conventional exercise [14]. CBT performed better than Tai Chi Chih for clinician-rated remission of insomnia and showed greater, more sustained improvement in sleep quality, fatigue and depressive symptoms (all P < 0.01) [15].
- Population
- 210 older adults in the tai chi and exercise arms [14]. 123 older adults [15].
- Sources
- [14], [15]
- Caveats
- Two trials of older adults.
Memory and cognition
Not shown to improve memory or thinking in people, alone or with exercise. One subgroup on dementia drugs scored about 3 points higher.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Taurine alone or combined with exercise did not change cognitive scores. Added to dementia drugs, MMSE scores rose by 3.09 points (95% CI 2.29 to 3.90) in a subgroup [6]. A 2026 systematic review of 8 single-dose trials, mostly at 1 to 3 g, found that most cognitive outcomes showed no effect, and the gains seen were small and inconsistent. Trials that added caffeine showed more consistent gains but could not separate taurine's part [7].
- Population
- 7 RCTs with 402 people, with and without cognitive impairment [6]. 8 RCTs with 244 healthy participants [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- Few small trials. The positive subgroup is one comparison among several [6]. The 2026 review covered only single doses and did not pool results [7].
Time to fall asleep and measured sleep
Not shown to shorten time to fall asleep or improve measured sleep in adults with or without sleep problems.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 18 RCTs, time to fall asleep differed from placebo by 0.70 minutes (95% CI -3.44 to 4.83), and visual-scale sleep quality did not differ (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.31) [1]. A review of 29 controlled trials found most showed no difference from placebo, and none of the most recent, most rigorous trials found an effect on sleep [4].
- Population
- Healthy adults and people with sleep disturbance or insomnia [1][4].
- Sources
- [1], [4]
- Caveats
- The reviews disagree in their reading of the same body of trials [1][4][3].
Memory and thinking in people without deficiency
Not shown to improve memory or thinking in people without B12 deficiency, alone or with folic acid.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 16 RCTs with 6,276 participants, neither B12 alone nor B12 combined with folic acid, with or without B6, changed any subdomain of cognitive function. Meta-regression found no factor that predicted an effect [6].
- Population
- People without advanced neurological disorders or overt B12 deficiency [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- The review excluded people with overt deficiency, so it does not describe the effect of treating a deficiency.
Depression symptoms
Not shown to improve depression in people without B12 deficiency.
Growth and thinking in children
Not shown to improve thinking or growth in children. B12 alone lowered B12 deficiency, 1.8% against 7.6% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- B12 alone against placebo made little to no difference to cognitive function such as attention (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.28, 2 trials, 438 children) or height (MD -0.19 cm, 95% CI -2.44 to 2.06). It lowered B12 deficiency, 1.8% against 7.6% (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.69, 3 trials, 642 children). Added to other micronutrients, B12 made little to no difference to cognitive function (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.13, 3 trials, 956 children) or development (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.08) [7].
- Population
- 16 trials with 4,083 children aged 2 days to 11 years in 10 countries, given 0.9 to 150 µg a day for 28 days to 31 months [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The authors rated growth and cognition evidence low certainty. Few trials reported these outcomes, and no trial of B12 alone reported adverse effects [7].
Smell loss
Not shown to improve smell in adults with smell disorders, though one study reported improvement after head injury.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 6 studies, improvement in tested smell function did not differ between zinc and control (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 5.03), nor did self-reported improvement (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.93). One study reported improvement in people with smell loss after head injury [8].
- Population
- Adults with smell disorders in 3 RCTs and 3 observational studies of 25 to 606 participants, followed 1 to 15 months [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Half the studies were observational. This concerns oral zinc. Intranasal zinc has been linked to smell loss (see Risks).
Recovery after traumatic brain injury (citicoline)
One large trial found citicoline did not change recovery at 90 or 180 days in 1,213 people with traumatic brain injury.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 1,213 patients, 2,000 mg a day for 90 days did not change functional and cognitive status at 90 days (global OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.15) or 180 days (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.04). Favorable improvement on the Glasgow Outcome Scale was 35.4% versus 35.6% [6].
- Population
- Complicated mild, moderate and severe brain injury at 8 US trauma centers [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One large NIH-funded trial.
Progressive multiple sclerosis
One trial found 1,200 mg a day did not slow walking decline over 24 months in progressive MS. Brain volume looked steadier than on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 24 months, 1,200 mg a day did not slow the decline in walking speed (-0.39 against -0.30 ft/s, difference -0.08, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.17). Mobility and patient-reported outcomes did not differ. Whole-brain and deep gray matter volume appeared stable on lipoic acid and declined on placebo [10].
- Population
- 115 people with primary or secondary progressive MS at 11 sites in the US and Canada [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- 37% on lipoic acid and 17% on placebo left the study [10].
Migraine prevention in children and teenagers
One trial in children and teenagers found amitriptyline no better than placebo for migraine, and it raised fatigue and dry mouth.
Compared with placebo and topiramate [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Headache days halved in 52% on amitriptyline, 55% on topiramate and 61% on placebo, with no differences in disability or headache days. The trial was stopped early for futility. Fatigue (30% against 14%) and dry mouth (25% against 12%) were more common on amitriptyline [8].
- Population
- 361 children and adolescents aged 8 to 17, 328 analyzed, over 24 weeks [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- One trial, with a high placebo response [8].
Healthy life span in adults over 70
One trial found daily aspirin did not lengthen survival free of dementia or disability in healthy adults aged 70 or over.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over a median 4.7 years, death, dementia or persistent physical disability occurred at 21.5 events per 1,000 person-years on aspirin 100 mg and 21.2 on placebo (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.11). Major hemorrhage occurred in 3.8% against 2.8% (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.62) [16].
- Population
- 19,114 community-dwelling adults in Australia and the US, median age 74, without cardiovascular disease, dementia or disability [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- The trial was stopped at a median 4.7 years. Adherence was about 62% in the final year [16].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 19,114 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Alzheimer's dementia
Limited evidence: 5 small, high-bias trials found no difference between bacopa and placebo or donepezil in Alzheimer's dementia.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of 5 trials found no difference between bacopa and placebo or donepezil, at very low certainty. Three of the trials combined bacopa with other herbal extracts [8].
- Population
- Adults with Alzheimer's dementia or mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- All 5 trials were judged at high risk of bias, with small samples and wide intervals [8].
Easing benzodiazepine withdrawal
One small trial found buspirone did not ease withdrawal in long-term benzodiazepine users, and 7 of 11 on buspirone dropped out.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people withdrawing from diazepam, buspirone 5 mg three times a day did not relieve withdrawal symptoms, and 7 of 11 on buspirone dropped out against 1 of 12 on placebo [14]. The label states buspirone does not show cross-tolerance with benzodiazepines and will not block their withdrawal syndrome [4].
- Population
- 23 long-term benzodiazepine users [14].
- Sources
- [14], [4]
- Caveats
- One trial of 23 people, in which the buspirone group started on higher diazepam doses [14].
Sleep
Small trials found CBD did not change total sleep time or significantly improve sleep disturbance, with a small gain in deep plus REM sleep in one.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 125 people with insomnia, 300 mg of CBD with terpenes on at least 4 nights a week for 4 weeks raised the share of the night in slow-wave plus REM sleep by 1.3 percentage points over placebo (95% CI 0.1 to 2.5), measured by a wrist-worn tracker. Total sleep time did not change [9]. In 63 adults with high trait worry, 300 mg a day for 2 weeks did not improve sleep disturbance significantly more than placebo (p 0.10) [10].
- Population
- Adults with insomnia in a crossover trial [9]. Adults reporting elevated worry [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Two small trials. [9] tested a CBD and terpene formulation, not CBD alone, and used a consumer sleep tracker rather than a sleep lab.
Memory and focus in adults (choline bitartrate or chloride)
One small pilot trial found a single 1,650 mg dose did not change working memory in 20 postmenopausal women.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A single 1,650 mg dose of choline bitartrate 3 hours before testing did not change working memory performance on an N-back task against placebo. Brain activation during the task was lower on choline in parts of the right temporal lobe [11].
- Population
- 20 postmenopausal women in a crossover pilot study [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One small pilot trial of a single dose. Brain activation is an imaging measure, not a memory outcome [11].
Anxiety and PTSD
Small trials of guanfacine found no difference from placebo on anxiety scales in children or on PTSD symptoms in veterans.
Compared with placebo [11][12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In children with anxiety disorders, anxiety rating scale scores did not differ between guanfacine and placebo, while clinicians rated more children as much improved (54.2% against 31.6%), in a study not designed for statistical testing [11]. In veterans with PTSD, guanfacine did not differ from placebo on clinician-rated or self-reported outcomes [12].
- Population
- 83 children aged 6 to 17 with anxiety disorders over 12 weeks [11]; a small sample of mostly male combat veterans over 8 weeks [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Both were pilot trials. No trial of clonidine for anxiety disorders was located.
Preventing dementia
One trial found 120 mg twice a day did not lower dementia or Alzheimer's incidence over 6 years in adults aged 75 or older.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 3,069 adults aged 75 or older followed a median 6.1 years, 120 mg twice a day did not lower dementia incidence (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.33) or Alzheimer's incidence (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.39). Dementia rates were 3.3 per 100 person-years on ginkgo and 2.9 on placebo. Progression from mild cognitive impairment did not change (HR 1.13) [5].
- Population
- 2,587 adults with normal cognition and 482 with mild cognitive impairment [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- One trial, funded by the NIH [5].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 3,069 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Cognition in healthy people
Limited evidence: a Cochrane review found no convincing evidence of a cognitive effect in healthy people.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review found 9 trials, 5 with usable data, all in healthy participants. Data could not be pooled. Some aspects of cognition, behavior and quality of life improved, and the authors found no convincing evidence of a cognitive effect in healthy people and no high-quality evidence in dementia [9].
- Population
- Healthy adults and one trial in age-associated memory impairment [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- Search date was 2009 [9].
Anxiety
Limited evidence: one trial in generalized anxiety disorder found anxiety fell as much on placebo as on individualized homeopathy, and a review found contradictory, underpowered trials.
Compared with placebo [15]; control conditions in eight randomized trials, which the review abstract does not describe [16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 44 people with generalized anxiety disorder, Hamilton anxiety scores improved significantly in both the homeopathy and placebo groups over 10 weeks, with no difference between groups [15]. A systematic review found eight randomized trials in test anxiety, generalized anxiety disorder and anxiety around cancer or surgery, with contradictory results and too little power or detail to draw conclusions [16].
- Population
- 44 adults with generalized anxiety disorder, 39 completing [15]. 8 randomized trials and many case reports and uncontrolled studies [16].
- Sources
- [15], [16]
- Caveats
- Small trials. The trial authors note that the size of improvement on placebo could explain belief in homeopathy [15].
Sudden anxiety and as-needed use
One trial found adding hydroxyzine to morphine did not significantly lower anxiety in 140 people with severe acute pain. No trial in panic attacks was located.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Among people with severe acute pain treated before reaching hospital, 91% given hydroxyzine with morphine reported no more severe anxiety against 78% given placebo with morphine, a difference that was not statistically significant. Pain relief at 15 minutes did not differ, at 51% against 52% [6]. The label states that clinical effects are usually noted within 15 to 30 minutes of an oral dose [5].
- Population
- 140 prehospital patients with acute pain scored 6 or more out of 10 [6].
- Sources
- [6], [5]
- Caveats
- One trial in an emergency setting, with hydroxyzine added to an opioid. It does not test a single dose taken for panic or everyday anxiety, and no such trial was located.
Calming before surgery
One trial found hydroxyzine did not lower anxiety before surgery against placebo in 165 children aged 2 to 16.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Anxiety scores at the time of anesthesia induction did not differ between hydroxyzine and placebo (39.2 against 37.0 on a preoperative anxiety scale, P = 0.788), with or without clowns as a distraction [7]. Sedation before and after general anesthesia is a labeled use, and the label states that hydroxyzine may potentiate meperidine and barbiturates given with it [5].
- Population
- 165 children aged 2 to 16 having outpatient surgery [7].
- Sources
- [7], [5]
- Caveats
- One trial in children, all accompanied by their parents. No recent placebo-controlled trial in adults was located.
Autism
One trial of 60 children, the only one in a Cochrane review, found no improvement in social interaction, communication, behavior or cognitive function against sham.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The trial's authors reported no improvement in social interaction and communication, behavioral problems, linguistic abilities or cognitive function. Side effect events were more frequent with hyperbaric treatment (Peto odds ratio 3.87, 95% CI 1.53 to 9.82), mostly minor ear barotrauma [25].
- Population
- 60 children with autism spectrum disorder in one randomized sham-controlled trial [25].
- Sources
- [25], [1]
- Caveats
- One small trial, rated low quality by the reviewers for sample size and short follow-up [25]. FDA lists autism among conditions that hyperbaric devices are not proven to cure [1].
Cerebral palsy in children
One trial of 111 children found no difference in motor function between 40 hyperbaric oxygen sessions and slightly pressurized room air.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Gross motor function scores rose 2.9% with hyperbaric oxygen at 1.75 ATA and 3.0% with air at 1.3 ATA (mean difference -0.40, 95% CI -1.69 to 0.90). Speech, attention, memory and functional skills improved in both groups without a difference between them. Ear problems occurred in 27 children on hyperbaric oxygen and 15 on pressurized air (p = 0.004) [26].
- Population
- 111 children aged 3 to 12 with cerebral palsy, 57 on hyperbaric oxygen and 54 on pressurized air [26].
- Sources
- [26]
- Caveats
- One trial. Both groups improved, and the comparison was pressurized air, not no treatment.
Sleep
One small trial found no difference in sleep duration or quality the night after a post-exercise infrared sauna in 16 athletes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Sleep duration (p = 0.377) and sleep quality rated 1 to 5 (p = 0.632) did not differ between the sauna and passive recovery nights. Night-time heart rate and heart rate variability did not differ either [20].
- Population
- 16 male basketball players, sleep recorded by diary [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- One night, self-reported by diary, in young athletes without sleep complaints.
Borderline personality disorder
One trial found lamotrigine did not improve borderline personality disorder symptoms at 52 weeks compared with placebo.
Compared with placebo added to usual care [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At 52 weeks the mean symptom score was 11.3 on lamotrigine and 11.5 on placebo (adjusted mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -1.8 to 2.0). No secondary outcome differed, including depression, self-harm and social functioning [12].
- Population
- 276 adults with borderline personality disorder in six English mental health services, 195 followed to 52 weeks [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Adherence was low: 36% on lamotrigine and 42% on placebo were taking it at 52 weeks [12].
Child IQ when treated in pregnancy
One trial found no difference in child IQ at 5 years when women with subclinical hypothyroidism or low free T4 were treated from mid-pregnancy.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Children of women treated for subclinical hypothyroidism had a median IQ of 97 against 94 on placebo (P = 0.71). In a parallel trial for low free T4, median IQ was 94 against 91 (P = 0.30). No other neurocognitive or pregnancy outcome differed [8].
- Population
- 677 women with subclinical hypothyroidism and 526 with low free T4, starting at a mean 16.7 to 17.8 weeks of pregnancy, with children followed for 5 years [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- One trial. Treatment started at 8 to 20 weeks, so it does not describe treatment from conception. Funded by the National Institutes of Health [8].
Cognition in healthy young adults
Small trials found no change in overall cognition or mood in healthy young adults, with better results on single tests such as the Stroop.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 18 adults aged 18 to 35, a single 3 g dose of a 10:1 fruiting-body extract did not change composite cognition or mood scores at 90 minutes, with better performance on one pegboard test [5]. In 41 adults aged 18 to 45, 1.8 g a day gave a faster Stroop time 60 minutes after the first dose (p = 0.005), and 28 days showed a trend toward lower subjective stress (p = 0.051) [6].
- Population
- Healthy young adults [5][6].
- Sources
- [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Pilot-sized trials. The authors of the 28-day trial note null and some negative findings [6].
Brain structure
One trial of 218 people found no change in gray matter volume, density or cortical thickness after an 8-week mindfulness course.
Compared with waiting list [21]; a matched active control program [21]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In two combined three-arm randomized trials, MRI scans before and after found no evidence that mindfulness-based stress reduction changed gray matter volume, gray matter density or cortical thickness compared with either control, at the whole-brain level or in regions named by earlier studies [21].
- Population
- 218 meditation-naive adults: 75 in the mindfulness course, 73 in the active control, 70 on a waiting list [21].
- Sources
- [21]
- Caveats
- Eight weeks of practice. It does not test people who have meditated for years. The authors note earlier positive studies lacked active controls and randomization [21].
School mindfulness lessons for teenagers
One trial of 8,376 students aged 11 to 14 found school mindfulness lessons did not lower risk for depression or raise well-being at 1 year.
Compared with usual social-emotional teaching [22]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against teaching as usual, the standardized mean differences at 1 year were 0.005 (95% CI -0.05 to 0.06) for depression risk, 0.02 for social-emotional-behavioral functioning and 0.02 for well-being. No intervention-related adverse events were observed [22].
- Population
- 8,376 students aged 11 to 14 in 84 UK schools [22].
- Sources
- [22]
- Caveats
- Ten classroom lessons for whole year groups, not an 8-week course people chose to join [22].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 8,376 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Depression not helped by an SSRI or SNRI, as an add-on
One trial found adding mirtazapine to an SSRI or SNRI did not clearly lower depression scores against placebo at 12 weeks in primary care.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At 12 weeks, mean Beck depression scores were 18.0 on added mirtazapine and 19.7 on added placebo (adjusted difference -1.83, 95% CI -3.92 to 0.27). Adverse effects were more common on mirtazapine and were associated with stopping the trial drug [11].
- Population
- Adults in primary care with depression that had not responded to an SSRI or SNRI [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One trial. The confidence interval includes both no effect and a small benefit.
Agitation in dementia
One trial found mirtazapine did not reduce agitation scores against placebo at 12 weeks in 204 people with dementia.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Mean agitation scores at 12 weeks did not differ between mirtazapine and placebo (adjusted mean difference -1.74, 95% CI -7.17 to 3.69). Adverse events occurred in 66% on mirtazapine and 64% on placebo. By week 16 there were 7 deaths on mirtazapine and 1 on placebo [12].
- Population
- 204 people with dementia and agitated behaviors [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- One trial. Not an approved use. See the block on deaths in this trial under risks.
Depression in dementia
One trial found mirtazapine did not lower depression scores against placebo at 13 or 39 weeks in people with dementia.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The fall in depression scores at 13 weeks did not differ between mirtazapine and placebo (difference 0.01, 95% CI -1.37 to 1.38), and the finding held to 39 weeks. Adverse reactions occurred in 41% on mirtazapine (44 of 108) and 26% on placebo (29 of 111) [13].
- Population
- People with dementia and depression randomized to mirtazapine (108), sertraline (107) or placebo (111) [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- One trial, in people with Alzheimer's disease receiving usual care.
Parkinson disease
One trial found symptom scores worsened slightly more on NR than placebo over a year in early Parkinson disease, below the clinically important threshold.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 52 weeks, the total MDS-UPDRS score rose by 2.45 points on NR and fell by 0.27 on placebo, an adjusted difference of 2.72 points (95% CI 0.47 to 4.98) favoring placebo. Non-motor symptom scores also worsened more on NR (difference 4.22 points, 95% CI 1.07 to 7.37). Three other key secondary outcomes, including dopamine transporter imaging, did not differ [8].
- Population
- 410 people with Parkinson disease diagnosed within 2 years, randomized to 500 mg twice daily or placebo at 11 centers in Norway [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- One phase 3 trial. The difference is smaller than the 5.2-point threshold the trial set for clinically important worsening [8].
Memory and cognition in mild cognitive impairment
Small trials found no change in cognition over 10 to 12 weeks in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Cognition scores did not change over 10 weeks on 1 g a day [3]. In a 12-week pilot, NR doubled blood NAD but did not improve cognitive function, the primary outcome, or total cerebral blood flow against placebo [9].
- Population
- 20 older adults with mild cognitive impairment [3]; 42 older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment [9].
- Sources
- [3], [9]
- Caveats
- Two small, short pilot trials.
Anxiety and mood, compared with plain foot massage
Limited evidence: two trials in women found anxiety and depression fell as much with plain foot massage or lay foot manipulation as with reflexology.
Compared with nonspecific foot massage [7]; lay foot manipulation, and conventional care [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 76 women with menopausal symptoms, anxiety scores fell from 0.43 to 0.22 with reflexology and from 0.37 to 0.27 with foot massage, and depression scores fell from 0.37 to 0.20 and from 0.36 to 0.20, with no difference between groups. Hot flushes and night sweats changed similarly [7]. In 385 women with advanced breast cancer, state anxiety and depressive symptoms did not differ between groups [6].
- Population
- 76 women aged 45 to 60 [7]. 385 women with advanced breast cancer [6].
- Sources
- [7], [6]
- Caveats
- In the menopause trial, 14 of 37 women given foot massage believed they had not received true reflexology [7].
Total sleep time, EMFIT QS
One study found the under-mattress EMFIT QS overestimated total sleep time by 178 minutes in sleep clinic patients, with data lost for 47% of participants.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- EMFIT QS (Quantified Sleep), an under-mattress ballistocardiography sensor
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, one clinical night
- Effect
- EMFIT QS overestimated total sleep time by 177.5 minutes (SD 119.4, p < .001) and underestimated wake after sleep onset by 44.7 minutes (SD 68.8). Agreement on sleep versus wake epochs was low (kappa 0.13), and the device did not distinguish sleep stages. Sleep onset latency and average resting heart rate agreed with polysomnography [6].
- Population
- 62 sleep laboratory patients, of whom 33 had usable data (15 women, mean age 53.7) [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Sleep clinic patients on a single night. Data loss occurred in 47% of participants. The abstract does not report the firmware version [6].
Total sleep time, Fitbit Sense 2, Oura Ring Gen3, SleepScore Max and Withings Sleep Mat in older adults
One study found three of four devices underestimated total sleep time by 57 to 76 minutes in 19 adults aged 56 to 80.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Fitbit Sense 2 (version 194.61), Oura Ring 3rd generation (version 2.8.41), SleepScore Max (version 2.1.0.1), Withings Sleep Mat (version 2481)
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, one night
- Effect
- In older adults, bias in total sleep time was -74.5 minutes for Fitbit (p = .012), -75.5 for Oura (p < .0001), -56.5 for SleepScore Max (p = .001) and -45.7 for the Withings mat (p = .083). Deep sleep was overestimated by 71.5 minutes on Oura, 97.4 on Withings and 88.8 on SleepScore Max. Limits of agreement were generally wider in older adults than in young adults across all measures [7].
- Population
- 19 adults aged 56 to 80 and 13 adults aged 19 to 24, one night each [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Small groups and a single night. The Withings bias did not reach statistical significance. The authors reported no financial disclosures [7].
Total sleep time, Withings Sleep Analyzer
One study found the under-mattress Withings Sleep Analyzer overestimated total sleep time by 48 minutes on average in 183 people with and without sleep disorders.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Withings Sleep Analyzer, an under-mattress sensor
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, in the laboratory
- Effect
- The sensor overestimated total sleep time by 48 minutes (SD 81), sleep efficiency by 9% (SD 15) and sleep onset latency by 6 minutes (SD 26), and underestimated wake after sleep onset by 54 minutes (SD 78). Epoch accuracy for sleep versus wake was 83%, with sensitivity 95% and specificity 37%. Accuracy was 89% in healthy individuals and 81% in those with sleep disorders [16].
- Population
- 183 participants (51% male, mean age 45) across several laboratory studies and more than 400 recordings, including people with sleep disorders and daytime sleep opportunities [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- Two authors have held an investigator-initiated research grant supported by Withings. The study was supported by Australia's Defence Science and Technology Group. The authors note a tendency to overestimate sleep where wake time is high [16]. In a separate study of older adults, the Withings Sleep Mat bias was -45.7 minutes and not statistically significant [7].
Sleep stages, Apple Watch Series 7, Fitbit Charge 5 and Polar Vantage M2
One study found weak agreement with polysomnography on sleep stage durations for three wrist devices, with light sleep off by 58 to 74 minutes on two of them.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 7, Fitbit Charge 5, Polar Vantage M2
- Compared with
- Home polysomnography, one night
- Effect
- Fitbit Charge 5 overestimated light sleep by 57.7 minutes (SD 80.5, P = .009). Apple Watch Series 7 underestimated light sleep by 73.8 minutes (SD 61.6, P < .001) and overestimated REM sleep by 30.3 minutes (SD 36.3, P = .003). Polar Vantage M2 overestimated REM sleep by 32.3 minutes (SD 43.6, P = .026). The authors describe agreement with polysomnography as generally weak, with wide limits of agreement [21].
- Population
- Healthy adults aged 18 to 45, each assigned one device: 20 Fitbit, 19 Apple Watch, 15 Polar [21].
- Sources
- [21]
- Caveats
- Each participant wore only one device, so the three were not tested on the same sleepers. Groups of 15 to 20. The abstract does not report firmware versions [21].
Sleep stages, Circul+ Ring, Oura Ring Gen 3 and SleepOn Go2Sleep in sleep clinic patients
One study found three rings classified sleep stages with 35 to 53% accuracy in 45 sleep clinic patients.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Oura Ring Gen 3, SleepOn Go2Sleep, Circul+ Ring
- Compared with
- Polysomnography, in a university sleep laboratory
- Effect
- Accuracy across wake, light, deep and REM sleep was 53.2% for Oura, 50.5% for SleepOn and 35.1% for Circul. Stage sensitivity ranged from 0.14 (REM on Circul) to 0.58 (light sleep on SleepOn). Sleep versus wake accuracy was about 85% for Oura and SleepOn and about 65% for Circul. Total sleep time was overestimated by 11.7 minutes on Oura and 50.5 minutes on SleepOn and underestimated by 31.5 minutes on Circul [11].
- Population
- 45 patients (20 women) aged 23 to 74, mean body mass index 33.5, with sleep apnea, insomnia and other disorders. Usable nights were 31 for Oura, 35 for SleepOn and 31 for Circul [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- A patient group with sleep disorders, where trackers have been studied less. The authors conclude that agreement on averages masks large differences for individual nights. They declared no competing interests [11].
Anxiety
One small trial found anxiety scores did not differ from placebo or diazepam in people with generalized anxiety disorder.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review found one eligible RCT, a 4-week pilot in 36 patients with generalized anxiety disorder. HAM-A scores did not differ between valerian and placebo, or between valerian and diazepam [6]. A 2020 meta-analysis pooled 8 studies (535 participants) on anxiety [3].
- Population
- 36 patients with GAD [6]. Mixed populations [3].
- Sources
- [3], [6]
- Caveats
- The 2020 abstract does not report a pooled anxiety effect size [3]. The Cochrane authors found the evidence too thin for conclusions [6].
Preventing depression
One trial found no change in the risk of depression over 5 years in adults 50 and older.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In VITAL, 2,000 IU a day for a median 5.3 years did not change the risk of depression or clinically relevant depressive symptoms (12.9 against 13.3 per 1,000 person-years, HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.09). Mood scores did not change (PHQ-8 difference 0.01 points, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05) [50].
- Population
- 18,353 US adults 50 and older, mean age 67.5, 16,657 of them with no history of depression [50].
- Sources
- [50]
- Caveats
- One trial. Participants were not selected for deficiency or for current depression [50].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 18,353 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Dementia
One trial found no clear difference in dementia over about 4 years in mostly vitamin D sufficient older adults, from few cases.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In the Finnish Vitamin D Trial, dementia was diagnosed in 18 people on placebo, 14 on 1,600 IU a day (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.55) and 13 on 3,200 IU a day (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.48) over a mean 4.2 years [51].
- Population
- 2,492 adults in Finland free of dementia, mean age 68.2 [51].
- Sources
- [51]
- Caveats
- There were 45 cases in all, so the intervals are wide. Participants were largely vitamin D sufficient, with a mean baseline of 74.8 nmol/L [51].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 2,492 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Checked, no increase found17
Tics
Not shown to raise the rate of new or worsening tics in children with ADHD: 5.7% on stimulants against 6.5% on placebo across 22 trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- New or worsening tics were reported by 5.7% on stimulants (95% CI 3.7 to 8.6) and 6.5% on placebo (95% CI 4.4 to 9.5), a risk ratio of 0.99 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.27). Type of stimulant, dose, treatment length and age did not change the result [30].
- Population
- 2,385 children with ADHD in 22 placebo-controlled trials [30].
- Sources
- [30]
- Caveats
- The amphetamine label still carries a warning on motor and verbal tics and worsening of Tourette's syndrome [17].
Adverse events in trials
Adverse events were about as common on ashwagandha as on placebo in trials up to 180 days, 5.6% against 9.2% in the largest.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The BfR lists acute effects reported with ashwagandha, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, drowsiness, headache, dizziness and skin rash, and states that trials did not systematically record unwanted effects [19]. In a 2026 trial in 1,002 adults with stress and anxiety, 600 mg a day of root extract for 8 weeks produced no serious adverse events. Adverse events occurred in 5.6% on extract and 9.2% on placebo, and liver, kidney and blood tests did not differ [18]. A review of 23 trials of standardized root extract found no serious adverse events attributed to it, and mild gastrointestinal discomfort, headache and drowsiness in both groups [7]. The sleep meta-analysis reported no serious side effects in 5 trials [5].
- Population
- 1,002 adults aged 18 to 65 [18]. 2,317 healthy adults [7]. Trial participants and case reports [5][19].
- Sources
- [19], [18], [7], [5]
- Caveats
- Trials ran 180 days or less, so longer-term effects were not measured [7]. The root extract review covered single-ingredient root extracts in healthy adults only, and two of its authors reported employment by companies [7].
Drowsiness and sedation
Not shown to cause more drowsiness than placebo: 10% against 9% across 17 trials, and less sedation than benzodiazepines.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Drowsiness was reported by 10% on buspirone and 9% on placebo [4]. In trials against benzodiazepines, azapirones caused less sedation, fatigue, drowsiness and cognitive complaints, at a level resembling placebo [1]. The label states that buspirone did not prolong or intensify the sedative effects of triazolam or flurazepam when given together [4].
- Population
- 477 patients on buspirone and 464 on placebo [4]; trials comparing azapirones with benzodiazepines [1].
- Sources
- [4], [1]
- Caveats
- The label adds that effects on any one person may not be predictable.
Sleep effects
Not shown to raise insomnia: 3% against 3% on placebo across 17 trials. Dream disturbances were reported in at least 1 in 100.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Insomnia was reported by 3% on buspirone and 3% on placebo. In the wider premarketing program, dream disturbances were classed as frequent, meaning at least 1 in 100 patients, with no placebo rate given [4].
- Population
- 477 patients on buspirone and 464 on placebo, and about 3,000 subjects in premarketing studies [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Four-week trials relying on reported events.
Depression and suicidal thoughts
Suicidal thoughts were about as common as on placebo, 0.6% in each group, in adults with obesity without major psychiatric illness.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In three pooled SURMOUNT trials, 0.6% in each group reported suicidal ideation, and nonfatal suicidal behavior occurred in 0.1% on tirzepatide and none on placebo. Depression scores at 72 weeks were 0.6 points lower on tirzepatide (PHQ-9) [28]. A systematic review of GLP-1 drugs and tirzepatide found no consistent evidence of higher suicide risk, with mixed pharmacovigilance findings [29].
- Population
- 4,056 adults with obesity and no known major psychiatric illness [28]; 16 studies, including 2 RCTs, 5 observational studies and 8 pharmacovigilance analyses [29].
- Sources
- [28], [29]
- Caveats
- The pooled trial analysis was post hoc and excluded people with major psychiatric illness [28].
Adverse events in trials
Adverse events were about as common as on placebo across trials, and slightly less common in a 48-trial review. Serious events were rare.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the Cochrane review, dropouts and adverse effects did not differ significantly from placebo, with a trend toward more dropouts for adverse events in prevention trials [1]. A 2019 meta-analysis found a risk ratio of 1.09 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.25) for adverse events [2]. In a 4-month trial of 755 adults, there were 293 adverse events on echinacea and 306 on placebo [8]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 48 trials (10,115 participants) found adverse events in 22.7% on echinacea and 24.8% on any control (p 0.014), and 29.1% against 32.3% when the control was placebo (p 0.005). Serious adverse events made up 0.09% of events on echinacea and 0.08% on control, with none fatal. In European spontaneous reports, the most common categories were gastrointestinal (17.7%), skin (16.1%), general (13.1%) and nervous system (10.3%, such as headache) [10].
- Population
- Trial participants [1][2][8][10]; EudraVigilance case reports [10].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [8], [10]
- Caveats
- Most trials were short. The 755-person trial tested Echinaforce, made by A. Vogel Bioforce AG, and its corresponding author's address is at bioforce.ch [8]. The 2026 meta-analysis mostly covered pharmaceutical-grade extracts, and its abstract does not report funding [10].
Depression
Not shown to raise reported depressive symptoms against placebo across 15 trials in more than 35,000 people.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Beta-blockers were not associated with a significant increase in reported depressive symptoms, at 6 more reports per 1,000 people a year with an interval from 7 fewer to 19 more. The result did not differ by lipid solubility of the drug [28].
- Population
- More than 35,000 people in 15 placebo-controlled trials in heart attack, heart failure or hypertension [28].
- Sources
- [28]
- Caveats
- One meta-analysis, of trials not designed to measure mood. The abstract gives no rate in each group.
Dependence, misuse and withdrawal
Not shown to cause withdrawal or misuse: after six months, abrupt stopping produced no withdrawal reaction, unlike a benzodiazepine in the same trial.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- After six months of treatment, blind and abrupt stopping brought a significant rise in symptoms consistent with withdrawal in the group on the benzodiazepine clorazepate and not in the group on buspirone [15]. The label states that human and animal studies showed no potential for abuse or diversion and no evidence of tolerance or dependence, and that volunteers with a history of recreational drug or alcohol use could not tell buspirone from placebo in two studies [4].
- Population
- Anxious outpatients treated for six months with buspirone 10 to 40 mg a day or clorazepate [15]; volunteers in two double-blind studies [4].
- Sources
- [15], [4]
- Caveats
- The buspirone group had a higher dropout rate over the six months [15]. The label notes that experiments cannot fully predict misuse once a drug is marketed.
Symptoms getting worse during treatment
Not shown to raise the risk of worsening. Depression worsened in a median 4% of therapy patients, a lower risk than in control groups.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across 23 comparisons, patients in psychotherapy for depression were 61% less likely to deteriorate than control patients (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.57). The median deterioration rate in therapy groups was 4%, and above 10% in some studies [17]. With self-guided internet CBT, 5.8% deteriorated against 9.1% in control groups (OR 0.62) [18].
- Population
- 18 trials of psychotherapy for adult depression [17]. 3,805 adults with depressive symptoms in 13 trials [18].
- Sources
- [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Only 6% of trials reported deterioration, defined in different ways [17]. The first analysis covers several psychotherapies, not CBT alone.
Adverse events in trials and reports
Adverse events were about as common as on placebo with single-ingredient Panax ginseng. Headache, sleep problems and gut complaints were the most common.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Trial data show adverse events with single-ingredient Panax ginseng at rates similar to placebo. Headache, sleep problems and gastrointestinal complaints were the most common. Serious events appear in isolated case reports, mostly with combination products where other ingredients may be responsible [11]. In erectile dysfunction trials, adverse events did not clearly differ from placebo (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.69 to 3.03) [7].
- Population
- Trial participants and spontaneous reports [7][11].
- Sources
- [7], [11]
- Caveats
- The safety review dates from 2002 [11].
Side effects in trials
Side effects were about as common as on placebo in most trials, though one cognition review found more. Short trials cannot detect rare liver injury.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In osteoarthritis trials, adverse events on turmeric extracts were similar to placebo and 12% fewer than on NSAIDs [1]. In depression trials, digestive (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.32) and neurological symptoms (OR 1.08) did not differ from control [25]. In COVID-19 trials, adverse events, mostly mild digestive symptoms, were comparable to placebo [40]. In 10 human cognition studies, adverse events were more frequent with curcumin than with control [39]. In 12 RCTs (1,303 people with diabetes), creatinine did not change (WMD -0.01 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.01) [52].
- Population
- Osteoarthritis, depression, COVID-19, cognition and diabetes RCTs [1][25][40][39][52].
- Sources
- [1], [25], [40], [39], [52]
- Caveats
- Trials of 16 weeks or less cannot detect the rare liver injury in the case series. The cognition review abstract does not give adverse event rates [39].
Adverse events
Small trials found no adverse events that doctors judged related to bilberry. Headaches were more frequent on extract in one trial, 18 of 55 against 11 of 54.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 109 adults given 240 mg a day or placebo for 12 weeks, the full text reports headaches in 18 of 55 on extract and 11 of 54 on placebo, colds in 10 and 12, and stomach ache or diarrhea in 6 and 6. Physicians judged all events unrelated to the extract, and blood and urine tests showed no related changes [2]. In 88 office workers given 480 mg a day or placebo for 8 weeks, there were no severe adverse events in either group [6].
- Population
- 109 healthy adults aged 20 to 60 in Japan [2]. 88 office workers aged 20 to 40 in Japan [6].
- Sources
- [2], [6]
- Caveats
- Two trials of 8 to 12 weeks, too small to detect rare harms. The headache difference was not tested statistically in the trial report [2]. The second abstract reports only severe events [6].
5 more
Adverse events
Not found: no adverse events were reported for biofeedback in constipation trials, and in a double-blind ADHD trial events occurred as often with sham.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- No adverse events were reported for biofeedback in the Cochrane constipation review, though most trials did not report on harms [11]. In the double-blind ADHD trial, adverse events were distributed proportionally between neurofeedback and sham [8].
- Population
- 931 adults in 17 trials [11]. 142 children [8].
- Sources
- [11], [8]
- Caveats
- Harms were not systematically recorded in most trials [11].
Alcohol
Not shown to add to impairment from alcohol in the formal interaction studies described in the label.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that formal studies of buspirone with alcohol indicate it does not increase alcohol-induced impairment in motor and mental performance [4].
- Population
- Volunteers in interaction studies summarized in labeling, with no head count given [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The label gives no study details.
Rebound and withdrawal after stopping
One trial found no rebound of anxiety and no withdrawal symptoms a week after abruptly stopping hydroxyzine 50 mg a day taken for 4 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a placebo-controlled trial, the advantage of hydroxyzine over placebo on anxiety scores persisted at an evaluation one week after abrupt discontinuation, with no rebound of anxiety or withdrawal symptoms reported [4].
- Population
- 133 patients with generalized anxiety disorder treated for 4 weeks [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- One trial of 4 weeks at 50 mg a day. No study of stopping after longer use or higher doses was located, and no study of misuse or dependence was located.
Mania or hypomania
Mania or hypomania was reported in 5% on lamotrigine, 4% on lithium and 7% on placebo in the 18-month bipolar trials, with no excess over placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the two 18-month bipolar trials, manic, hypomanic or mixed episodes reported as adverse reactions occurred in 5% on lamotrigine, 4% on lithium and 7% on placebo. Across all controlled bipolar trials, the rates were 5%, 3% and 4% [4].
- Population
- 227 on lamotrigine, 166 on lithium and 190 on placebo, and 956, 280 and 803 across all controlled bipolar trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Counts from the manufacturer's trials, with no confidence intervals.
Alcohol
One trial found escitalopram did not add to the mental and motor impairment caused by alcohol, according to its label.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The escitalopram label states that the drug did not potentiate the cognitive and motor effects of alcohol in a clinical trial. The same label states that alcohol use by people taking it is not advised [25].
- Population
- Volunteers in a clinical trial described in labeling, with no head count given [25].
- Sources
- [25]
- Caveats
- One trial, summarized in a sentence. The experiments were in people without depression [25].
Not studied in people14
Sleep and insomnia
Not studied in people with insomnia. A Cochrane review found no trials of amitriptyline for insomnia, though sedation is one of its side effects.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of antidepressants for insomnia found no evidence for amitriptyline, despite its common use [12]. The label describes amitriptyline as an antidepressant with sedative effects [13], and depression trials found more sedation than on placebo [1].
- Population
- 23 trials with 2,806 participants of other antidepressants for insomnia [12].
- Sources
- [12], [13], [1]
- Caveats
- Sedation in depression trials does not show better sleep in people with insomnia.
Hangover
Not studied in people as an IV drip. Drips are offered on the idea that hangover is dehydration, and studies of drinkers find the two occur together but independently.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- No trial located gave IV fluids or vitamins for hangover. A review of drinkers found hangover severity and thirst rose with the water people drank, that dehydration was mild and short-lived while hangovers lasted longer, and that water drunk during a hangover was not related to changes in its severity [8]. In a 2024 secret shopper study, 86.2% of IV spas suggested specific drips for headache and cold symptoms, and 2 of 255 spa websites cited a source for any health claim [1].
- Population
- No study population for IV drips. Survey and naturalistic data on drinkers [8].
- Sources
- [8], [1]
- Caveats
- Findings on drinking water do not test an IV drip. No study located measured hangover symptoms after an IV drip.
Opioid withdrawal
Not studied in people in a trial. Users report less opioid withdrawal and craving, and mitragynine eased morphine withdrawal signs in rats. Kratom itself causes dependence and withdrawal.
No study in people. This rests on what users report, animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an online survey of 2,798 kratom users, 1,144 (41%) said they used it to stop or cut down opioids, citing less opioid withdrawal and craving, and 411 reported more than a year without opioids that they attributed to kratom [21]. In morphine-dependent rats, mitragynine, kratom's main alkaloid, reduced acute withdrawal signs, while methadone and buprenorphine did so at smaller doses [22]. Regular kratom users also develop dependence and their own withdrawal symptoms [12][13].
- Population
- Self-selected online respondents, mostly in the US [21]. Morphine-dependent rats [22]. Regular kratom users [12][13].
- Sources
- [21], [22], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Survey answers come from people who chose to respond and are not checked against any measure. No controlled trial of kratom for opioid withdrawal was located. Withdrawal from kratom itself is reported in the risk record on this page [12][13].
Nerve regeneration
Not studied in people. Animal studies found rats with crushed leg nerves regained walking function sooner on a lion's mane extract than on no treatment.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, lab studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In rats with a crushed peroneal nerve, a daily oral water extract of fresh lion's mane fruiting bodies brought back hind limb function earlier than no treatment, and axon regrowth and muscle reinnervation were better. Mecobalamin, the positive control, did the same [8]. A 2026 systematic review of 11 animal and cell studies of mushrooms for peripheral nerve injury included 5 on lion's mane and found mushroom treatments promoted nerve repair and functional recovery in animals and Schwann cell migration in cells [9].
- Population
- Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats [8]. Animal and cell studies [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- Rat and cell work only. The review's authors state the approach needs clinical research [9]. No trial in people with nerve injury was located.
Stress and social ease
Not studied in people. A review of online drug forums found people take phenibut for anxiety relief and euphoria, and often report tolerance and withdrawal.
No study in people. This rests on what users report, documented traditional use, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2015 survey of online drug discussion forums and the medical literature found phenibut is taken for its anxiety-relieving and euphoric properties, with tolerance and withdrawal commonly reported as adverse effects [20]. A pharmacology review describes phenibut as acting mainly at GABA-B receptors, and as widely used in Russia to relieve tension, anxiety and fear [21].
- Population
- Online forum posts and published case reports [20]. Pharmacology and clinical use in Russia [21].
- Sources
- [20], [21]
- Caveats
- Forum reports are self-selected and unverified, and they describe what users seek, not what a controlled study measured. No trial of phenibut for everyday stress or social situations was located.
Alcohol withdrawal
Not studied in people. Phenibut is used in Russia to treat alcohol withdrawal, and it acts mainly on GABA-B receptors in the brain.
No study in people. This rests on documented traditional use, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A study of supplements sold in the US notes that phenibut is used to treat anxiety, insomnia, alcohol withdrawal and other conditions in Russia [9]. A pharmacology review describes it as a GABA-mimetic acting mainly at GABA-B and to some extent GABA-A receptors [21].
- Population
- Medical use in Russia, as described in published reviews [9][21].
- Sources
- [9], [21]
- Caveats
- A statement of how it is used, not a measured result. No trial of phenibut for alcohol withdrawal was located in English-language databases. Phenibut causes its own withdrawal syndrome, described under Risks.
Sleep
Not studied in people. Used in China for insomnia for hundreds of years. In rats, an extract lengthened total and non-REM sleep in one study but not another.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, documented traditional use.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Reishi has been used in China as a tranquilizing agent for restlessness, insomnia and palpitations for hundreds of years [10]. In freely moving rats, 3 days of an oral fruiting body extract at 80 mg/kg increased total sleep time and non-REM sleep, an effect blocked by an antibody to TNF-α [10]. In another study, a water extract at 80 and 120 mg/kg did not change sleep architecture in normal rats, but shortened sleep onset and lengthened sleep in rats given pentobarbital, an effect partly blocked by the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil [11].
- Population
- Rats and mice [10][11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Rodent studies with short dosing, and the two disagree on sleep in normal animals. No sleep trial in people was located.
Anxiety and mood
Not studied in people. In rats under chronic stress, semax reversed loss of interest in sweetened water, a depression-like sign, and restored hippocampal BDNF.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In male rats under chronic unpredictable stress, daily semax injections reversed or reduced stress-induced anhedonia, the stress-related slowing of weight gain, adrenal enlargement and the fall in hippocampal BDNF. It did not change immobility in the forced swim test [11]. FDA's review notes antidepressant-like and anxiety-reducing effects in rodents [3]. In 52 healthy adults, a single dose of semax or the related peptide selank changed resting connectivity between the right amygdala and temporal cortex on fMRI, against placebo [12].
- Population
- Male Sprague-Dawley rats [11]. Rodent studies reviewed by FDA [3]. 52 healthy adults [12].
- Sources
- [11], [3], [12]
- Caveats
- Rodent models of stress do not show what happens to anxiety or mood in people. The fMRI study measured brain connectivity, not symptoms [12]. FDA lists a meeting abstract of semax given with therapy to 120 children with depression, with no full results available [3].
ADHD
Not studied in people. A Russian expert council lists semax as an ADHD add-on with a limited evidence base, and animal work shows dopamine and BDNF effects.
No study in people. This rests on documented traditional use, animal studies, how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 2026 an expert council of Russian pediatric neurologists placed semax in its group of add-on ADHD medicines with a limited evidence base, used in Russian practice, below a group backed by a double-blind trial. It stated that add-on therapy is not a substitute for atomoxetine in eligible patients [13]. A 2007 hypothesis paper proposed semax for ADHD because in animal studies it increased the effect of stimulants on brain dopamine release and raised brain BDNF [10].
- Population
- Clinical practice in Russia, as assessed by an expert council [13]. Animal studies, reviewed [10].
- Sources
- [13], [10]
- Caveats
- A consensus statement and a hypothesis paper, not trial results. No trial of semax in ADHD was located.
Inflammation
Not studied in people. In lab brain immune cells and in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, TB-500 lowered signs of inflammation.
No study in people. This rests on lab studies, animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a microglia cell line, the brain's immune cells, TB-500 suppressed the nitric oxide production and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression set off by bacterial lipopolysaccharide. In 5xFAD mice, a model of Alzheimer's disease, it reduced glial activation in the brain [18].
- Population
- Cells in the lab, and 5xFAD mice [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- The study measured brain inflammation in a model of Alzheimer's disease, not the injury or joint inflammation TB-500 is taken for. It tested another thymosin beta-4 fragment, Ac-SDKP, alongside TB-500 [18].
Abuse potential signal
Animal studies only: in mice, semax boosted the dopamine release amphetamine produces. FDA found no human study of abuse potential.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- FDA reported that in mice, semax increased the dopamine release that amphetamine produces in the striatum, a response FDA notes is typically induced by drugs of abuse. FDA found no studies that would inform semax's abuse potential [3].
- Population
- Animal studies (mice) reviewed by FDA [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- An animal finding. No human study of abuse potential was located by FDA [3].
Sugar addiction
Not studied in people as an addiction. Rats given intermittent sugar access showed bingeing, withdrawal-like and craving behaviors, and a review found little support in humans.
No study in people. This rests on animal studies.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In rats with intermittent access to sugar, bingeing, withdrawal, craving and cross-sensitization were each shown, with brain changes also seen with addictive drugs [16]. A later review found little evidence for sugar addiction in humans and concluded that the animal behaviors arise from intermittent access to sweet or palatable foods rather than from sugar's effects in the brain [17].
- Population
- Rats [16]. A review of animal and human literature [17].
- Sources
- [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Animal findings under intermittent access schedules do not show addiction in people [17].
2 more
Alcohol and sedating drugs
Not studied in people. The label predicts that alcohol and other sedating drugs may add to topiramate's sleepiness and thinking effects.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The label states the combination of topiramate with alcohol or other central nervous system depressants has not been evaluated in clinical studies, and calls for extreme caution because of topiramate's potential to cause central nervous system depression and cognitive effects [3].
- Population
- Labeling statement [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- A predicted interaction, not one measured in a trial.
Interaction with dopamine-acting drugs
Not studied in people. Predicted, not observed: because vitex acts on dopamine signaling, a safety review suggests it might interfere with dopamine-blocking drugs.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review of adverse events found no reported drug interactions and stated that, in theory, vitex might interfere with dopaminergic antagonists [9]. Its dopamine activity is the proposed basis for lower prolactin [5].
- Population
- Review of human safety data [9].
- Sources
- [9], [5]
- Caveats
- A theoretical interaction with no reported cases [9].
Not yet researched3
Sleep
We haven't sourced research on this yet.
Sleep and insomnia
We haven't sourced research on this yet.
Migraine
We haven't sourced research on this yet.